Aopwiki

SNAPSHOT

Created at: 2018-02-23 15:17

AOP ID and Title:


AOP 17: Binding of electrophilic chemicals to SH(thiol)-group of proteins and /or to seleno-proteins during brain development leads to impairment of learning and memory
Short Title: Oxidative stress and Developmental Neurotoxicity

Graphical Representation


Authors


Florianne Tschudi-Monnet, Department of Physiology, University of Lausanne, Switzerland, and Swiss Center for Applied Human Toxicology (SCAHT), Florianne.Tschudi-Monnet@unil.ch

Marie-Gabrielle Zurich Fontanellaz, Department of Physiology, University of Lausanne and SCAHT, Switzerland, mzurich@unil.ch

Carolina Nunes, Department of Physiology, University of Lausanne, Switzerland, carolina.nunes@unil.ch

Jenny Sandström, SCAHT, Switzerland, jsm.sandstrom@gmail.com

Rex FitzGerald, SCAHT, Switzerland, rex.fitzgerald@unibas.ch

Michael Aschner, Albert Einstein College of Medecine, New York, USA, michael.aschner@einstein.yu.edu

Joao Rocha, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Federal University of Santa Maria, jbtrocha@gmail.com


Status

Author status OECD status OECD project SAAOP status
Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite Under Development 1.13 Included in OECD Work Plan

Abstract


This Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) describes the linkage between binding to sulfhydryl(SH)-/seleno-proteins and impairment of learning and memory, a deficit observed in autism spectrum disorders. Binding to SH-/ seleno-proteins has been defined as the Molecular Initiating Event (MIE). As the binding to the SH-/seleno-groups directly interferes with the function of the SH-/seleno-containing proteins, which are mainly located in mitochondria or are involved in the protection against oxidative stress, the MIE directly leads to the Key Event (KE), namely oxidative stress. In turn, oxidative stress, due either to increased ROS production or decreased anti-oxidant defenses leads to either cell injury/death or to glutamate dyshomeostasis. Glutamate dyshomeostasis, in turn, leads to cell injury/death via excitotoxicity due to overactivation of NMDA receptors, as described in AOP 48. Cell injury/death will affect the network formation and function, culminating in functional deficits such as impairment in learning and memory, defined as the Adverse Outcome (AO). Neuroinflammation is triggered secondary to cell injury/death and will exacerbate the neurotoxic pathway. According to the new AOP rules, neuroinflammation is defined by the two hub KEs: Tissue resident cell activation and increased pro-inflammatory mediators, which are common to all inflammatory processes across all tissues and permit connection with all AOPs where inflammation is an inherent mechanism. As an intermediary application of these new rules, the Key Events Relationships (KERs) linking these two hub KEs with cell injury/death are represented, but the description is found under the KERs linking neuroinflammation to cell injury/death. Two reasons account for it: (i) it allows to link this AOP with the other AOPs for neurotoxicity where neuroinflammation  is included as a KE; and (ii) there is not sufficient literature for the empirical support allowing to treat the two KEs separately. The weight-of-evidence supporting the relationships between the described KEs is based mainly on effects observed after exposure to mercury (methylmercury, mercury chloride, thiomersal, mercury metal vapor), and some scarce studies on the effects of acrylamide and acrolein. Essentiality of the KEs for this AOP is moderate to strong, since blocking, preventing or attenuating an upstream KE is mitigating the downstream KE. The domain of applicability of this AOP is mainly defined for brain development, but a similar sequence of KEs can occur in adult brain leading to the same AO, also associated with neurodegenerative diseases.


Background


Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) comprises a heterogeneous class of neurodevelopmental disorders characterized by deficits in both social behavior and cognitive function (Gilbert and Man, 2017). Besides genetic susceptibilities, environmental factors have been implicated in the etiology of ASD (Hallmayer et al., 2011; Li et al., 2017). Several epidemiological studies have observed an association between developmental exposure to mercury and ASD, where children with ASD had significantly higher levels of blood mercury (Li et al., 2017; Saghazadeh and Rezai, 2017; Mostafa et al., 2016 ; Jafari et al., 2017). But such an association does not establish causality. The preparation of this AOP demonstrates mechanistic plausibility for the epidemiological observations on the relationship between mercury exposure and an elevated risk of ASD development.

The primary target of mercury is the binding to thiol- and seleno-proteins, which will be the MIE. Other compounds, such as acrylamide and acrolein, share this MIE with the different forms of mercury (methylmercury, ethylmercury, mercury chloride and elemental mercury vapor) (Oliveira et al, 2017). However, since this AOP will focus on developmental exposure, and due to the lack of literature describing behavioral alterations following developmental exposure of acrylamide and acrolein, mercury will be used as the primary chemical initiator in the empirical support of the KERs.

Developmental exposure to mercury triggers a cascade of events including mitochondrial dysfunction, perturbations of anti-oxidant defense mechanisms, interferences with glutamate homeostasis, neuroinflammation, perturbation of cell differentiation (Farina et al., 2011; Antunes dos Santos et al., 2016; Morris et al., 2017; Kern et al., 2012), which resembles ASD endophenotypes (Loke et al., 2015), which includes chronic nitro-oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, decrease in glutathione content, neuroinflammation and epigenetic dysregulation of genes involved in neurodevelopment, synaptic function and inflammatory/immune pathways (Gilbert and Man, 2017 ; Morris et al., 2017). These molecular and cellular alterations underlie neurobehavioral effects, which are expressed as altered motor function and coordination, memory and learning disabilities, decrease in overall activity, depression-like behavior following neurodevelopmental mercury exposure, and as cognitive deficits, impaired social interactions, restrictive interests and repetitive behaviors in ASD (Landa et al., 2008). The neurocognitive domain, in particular dentate gyrus, hippocampus and cortex are particularly susceptible to the neurotoxicity of mercury in the developing brain (Morris et al., 2017; Sobolowski et al., 2011, 2013; Ceccatelli et al., 2013), therefore we will focus on impairment in learning and memory and consider it as the AO. We are aware that this AO does not cover all pathological symptoms of ASD, but the methods to measure it belong to the OECD regulatory toolbox, as required.


Summary of the AOP

Events

Molecular Initiating Events (MIE), Key Events (KE), Adverse Outcomes (AO)

Sequence Type Event ID Title Short name
1 MIE 1487 Binding, SH/seleno proteins Binding, SH/seleno proteins
2 KE 1392 Oxidative Stress Oxidative Stress
3 KE 1488 Glutamate dyshomeostasis Glutamate dyshomeostasis
4 KE 55 N/A, Cell injury/death N/A, Cell injury/death
5 KE 188 N/A, Neuroinflammation N/A, Neuroinflammation
6 KE 1492 Tissue resident cell activation Tissue resident cell activation
7 KE 1493 Increased Pro-inflammatory mediators Increasaed pro-inflammatory mediators
8 KE 386 Decrease of neuronal network function Neuronal network function, Decreased
9 AO 341 Impairment, Learning and memory Impairment, Learning and memory

Key Event Relationships

Upstream Event Relationship Type Downstream Event Evidence Quantitative Understanding
Binding, SH/seleno proteins adjacent Oxidative Stress High
Oxidative Stress adjacent Glutamate dyshomeostasis Moderate
Glutamate dyshomeostasis adjacent N/A, Cell injury/death High
N/A, Cell injury/death adjacent N/A, Neuroinflammation Moderate
N/A, Cell injury/death adjacent Tissue resident cell activation Moderate
N/A, Neuroinflammation adjacent N/A, Cell injury/death Moderate
Increased Pro-inflammatory mediators adjacent N/A, Cell injury/death Moderate
N/A, Cell injury/death adjacent Decrease of neuronal network function High
Decrease of neuronal network function adjacent Impairment, Learning and memory High
Oxidative Stress non-adjacent N/A, Cell injury/death High

Stressors


Name Evidence
Methylmercuric(II) chloride High
Mercuric chloride High
Acrylamide Moderate
Acrolein Low
thiomersal Low

Overall Assessment of the AOP

Experimental and epidemiological evidences indicate that compared to the adult central nervous system (CNS), the developing CNS is generally more susceptible to toxicant exposure (Costa et al., 2004; Grandjean and Landrigan, 2006). Pre-natal and post-natal exposure may have long-term consequences, i.e. not detected immediately at the end of the exposure period. Such effects have been described on child development in communities with chronic low level mercury exposure (Castoldi et al., 2008; Debes et al., 2006; Grandjean et al., 2014; Lam et al., 2013).

The aim of this AOP is to capture the KEs and the KERs that occur after binding to thiol- and selenol groups of proteins, the MIE and the known molecular target of chemical initiators such as mercury, acrylamide and acrolein, and impairment in learning and memory, the AO, which is a neurotoxicity marker belonging to the OECD regulatory tool box. Data are most extensive for mercury as stressor during development; data for other stressors such as acrylamide and acrolein are much more limited. Chronic, low-dose prenatal MeHg exposure from maternal consumption of fish has been associated with endpoints of neurotoxicity in children, including poor performance on neurobehavioral tests, particularly on tests of attention, fine-motor function, language, visual-spatial abilities (e.g., drawing), and verbal memory (NRC, 2000). Some –SH- or –SeH-containing proteins have been demonstrated to be inhibited by MeHg either in vitro or in vivo, but a causal relationship has not been established between these inhibitory effects and the final pathological events (Oliveira, 2017). The analysis of the essentiality of the KEs and of the weight of evidence for the KERs supports a plausible mechanistic link between the MIE and the AO.


Domain of Applicability

Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
During brain development
Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
rat Rattus norvegicus High NCBI
mouse Mus musculus High NCBI
human Homo sapiens Moderate NCBI
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Unspecific Moderate

As autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental illness, this AOP is mainly focused on the developmental period, although it cannot be excluded that long-term exposure in adult may trigger a similar cascade of KEs leading also to impairment in learning and memory, as observed in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (Mutter et al., 2010). Regarding sex differences, ASD has a higher prevalence in male (4:1) (Fombonne, 2005). While no specific sex differences have been analyzed/described for most KEs, Curtis and coworkers (2011) observed a higher level of TNF-a in hippocampus of male prairie wolf than in female, both treated for 10 weeks with inorganic mercury, in the form of HgCl2; whereas Zhang and coworkers (2013) found a higher neuroinflammatory response associated with altered social behavior in female mice offspring than in male, following gestational exposure to HgCl2. However, after developmental methylmercury exposure, long-lasting behavioral alterations were more prominent in males (Ceccatelli et al., 2013; Castoldi et al., 2008). These discrepancies may be due to sex differences in kinetics or susceptibility (Vahter et al., 2006).

Essentiality of the Key Events

Support for Essentiality of KEs

Defining Question

Are downstream KEs and/or the AO prevented if an upstream KE is blocked ?

High (Strong)

Moderate

Low (Weak)

Direct evidence from specifically designed experimental studies illustrating essentiality for at least one of the important KEs (e.g. stop/reversibility studies, antagonism, knock out models, etc.)

Indirect evidence that sufficient modification of an expected modulating factor attenuates or augments a KE leading to increase in KE down or AO

No or contradictory experimental evidence on the essentiality of any of the KEs

MIE

Binding to SH-/seleno-proteins

HIGH

RATIONALE: Strong affinity binding (or exchange reaction) of mercury to SH- and seleno-proteins is well known. Such binding can directly inactivate the protein function or can indirectly facilitate protein denaturation. SH-containing proteins are more abundant than seleno-containing proteins. (For review: Farina et al., 2011). Carvalho et al  (2011) reported inhibition of activity of NADPH-reduced seleno-enzyme thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) by inorganic and organic mercury compounds, consistent with binding of mercury also to the active site selenol/thiol. On treatment with 5 µM selenite and NADPH, TrxR inactivated by HgCl2 displayed almost full recovery of activity. Similarly, recovery of TrxR activity and cell viability by selenite was observed in HgCl2-treated HEK 293 cells.

KE1

Oxidative stress

HIGH

RATIONALE: The deleterious consequences of oxidative stress are well accepted in various animal models. Oxygen radical scavengers, such as glutathione, catalase, selenium and cysteine blocked the methylmercury neurotoxicity in cerebral neuron culture (Park et al., 1996). In mouse primary cerebral cortical cultures, MeHg 5 μM depleted mono- and disulfide glutathione in neuronal, glial and mixed cultures. Supplementation with exogenous glutathione (glutathione monoethyl ester, GSHME) protected against MeHg-induced increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation and neuronal death (Rush, 2012). In brain mitochondrial-enriched fractions from adult male Swiss mice dosed with 40 mg MeHg/L drinking water for 21 days (this dose induces rotarod and open-field locomotor deficits; brain concentration ca 10 μM Hg), in vitro incubation with the antioxidant enzyme SOD, a superoxide scavenger, as well as catalase and GPx, which are peroxide detoxifying enzymes, blocked MeHg-induced increase in ROS formation (Franco, 2009). In mitochondrial-enriched fractions from whole brain minus cerebellum of adult male Swiss mice, 10-100 µM MeHg increased lipid peroxidation end-products and disrupted mitochondrial activity. Co-incubation with diphenyl diselenide (100 μM) completely prevented these effects (Meinerz, 2011).

A strong exacerbation of methylmercury neurotoxicity was observed in 3D cultures treated simultaneously with promoters of hydroxyl radical formation (10 mM copper sulphate plus 100 mM ascorbate), showing that in pro-oxidant conditions when anti-oxidant defense mechanisms are overwhelmed, low, non-cytotoxic concentrations of mercury became potently neurotoxic. This indirectly suggests that ROS production is an important mechanism in mercury neurotoxicity (Sorg et al., 1998).

KE2

Glutamate dyshomeostasis

HIGH

RATIONALE: There is an abundant literature showing that mercury interferes with glutamate uptake/transport, metabolism in astrocytes and neurons (see relative KERs) and as glutamate is the main excitatory transmitter, and is involved in memory processes, it is well accepted that perturbation of glutamate homeostasis has deleterious functional consequences. The use of microdialysis probes demonstrate that 10 or 100 mM of methylmercury induced a significant elevation of extracellular glutamate level in the frontal cortex of adult awake rats (Juarez et al., 2002). In addition, antagonists of NMDA receptors, such as MK-801 (non-competitive antagonist), D-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (APV, competitive antagonist) and 7-chlorokynurenic acid (antagonist of glycine site associated to NMDAR) blocked methylmercury-induced neurotoxicity in cerebral neuron cultures (Park et al., 1996).

KE3

Cell Injury/death, increased

HIGH

RATIONALE: Cell injury/death is a highly converging node in AOPs. Decrease in synaptic connectivity or cell loss will in turn induce perturbations in the establishment of neuronal connections and trigger inflammatory responses, which through a feedback loop can exacerbate this KE.

KE4

Neuroinflammation

 

KE4' Tissue resident cell activation

 

KE4'' Pro-inflammatory mediators, increased

MODERATE

RATIONALE: It is widely accepted in different experimental animal models that the use of minocycline, an antibiotic, which blocks microglial reactivity has protective effects, as have other interferences with any inflammatory mediators. However, we rate the essentiality of this KE as moderate (i) given the complexity of the neuroinflammatory response, having either reparative or neurodegenerative consequences, (ii) since few reported studies exist where adverse effects of mercury and acrylamide are decreased when the neuroinflammatory process is modulated (see below), and (iii) because the reported studies were not performed during the developmental exposure period (see below).

Adult rats exposed to MeHg (5mg/kg bw) for 12 consecutive days exhibited piknotic nuclei in cerebellar granule cells, what was reverted by a co-administration of CA074 an inhibitor of cathepsin released by activated microglia. These observations strongly suggest that the mercury–induced neuropathological changes are secondary to microglial activation (Sakamoto et al., 2008).

Farnesol (a sequiterpene) reduced astrogliosis (decreased GFAP) and microgliosis (decreased Iba1) and TNF-a, Il-1b and i-NOS in cortex, hippocampus and striatum of rats exposed to acrylamide (20 mg/kg bw for 4 weeks). This was associated with a marked improvement in motor coordination (Santhanasabapathy et al., 2015). (Santhanasabapathy et al., 2015).

KE5

Decreased network formation and function

HIGH

RATIONALE: Mercury interferes strongly with glutamate neurotransmission, which is an important mechanism underlying memory function (for review: Featherstone, 2010). In addition, during brain development, glutamate has also trophic effects, by stimulating BDNF production or through the activation of the different glutamate receptors. The trophic effect of glutamate receptor activation is developmental stage-dependent and may play an important role in determining the selective survival of neurons that made proper connections (Balazs, 2006).

 AO

Impairment of learning and memory

HIGH

RATIONALE: The neurocognitive domain, in particular dentate gyrus, hippocampus and cortex are particularly susceptible to the neurotoxicity of mercury in the developing brain (Morris et al., 2017; Sobolowski et al., 2011, 2013; Ceccatelli et al., 2013). Chronic, low-dose prenatal MeHg exposure from maternal consumption of fish has been associated with endpoints of neurotoxicity in children, including poor performance on neurobehavioral tests, particularly on tests of attention, fine-motor function, language, visual-spatial abilities (e.g., drawing), and verbal memory (NRC, 2000). Prenatal MeHg exposure is associated with childhood memory and learning deficits, particularly visual memory performance (Orenstein, 2017).

Weight of Evidence Summary

Dose-response and temporal concordance of KEs

There is no study where all KEs are measured simultaneously after exposure to several doses, impeding a dose-response and concordance analysis. In one single study (in blue in the table), three downstream KEs were measured following pre-natal exposure to methylmercury. Comparisons of all animal studies show that doses used are ranging from 0.5 - 5 mg/kg; but dose-response was seldom performed. In these studies, the time (pre-natal, post-natal, lactation,...) and duration of exposure are quite diverse and no analysis of brain mercury content was made, so it is not possible to compare doses between studies. Therefore, based on the present data, it is impossible to define whether KEs up occur at lower doses and earlier time points than KEs down.

For in vitro studies, KEs up are often measured after acute exposure to high concentrations.

The following table summarizes concentrations/doses, time, and duration of exposure for the various test systems and KEs.

MIE

KE1

KE2

KE3

KE4

KE5

AO

Binding to SH-/seleno-proteins

Oxidative stress

Glutamate dyshomeostasis

Cell injury/death

Neuroinflammation

Decreased network formation and function

Impairment in learning and memory

In vivo

In vivo

In vivo

In vivo

In vivo

In vivo

In vivo

C57BL/6J mice dosed with 5 mg MeHg/L in drinking water during gestation and lactation

Cytoplasmic and nuclear TrxR and Cytoplasmic Gpx were reduced in cerebral and cerebellar cortex of 22 days-old offspring (Ruszkiewicz, 2016)

 

Male C57BL/6NJcl mice dosed with 30 ppm methylmercury in drinking water   for 6-weeks

(Fujimura, 2017)

 

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to methylmercury (1 mg/kg orally for 6 months) (Joshi, 2014)

 

Zebra fish brain exposed to Hg2+, MeHg 1.8 molar (measured in brain tissue), for 28 days.

(Branco, 2012)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Male C57BL/6NJcl mice exposed to methylmercury (1.5 mg/kg/day

for 6-weeks)

(Fujimura, 2017)

 

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to methylmercury (1 mg/kg orally for 6 months) (Joshi, 2014)

 

 

Zebra fish brain exposed to Hg2+, MeHg 1.8 molar (measured in brain tissue), for 28 days.

(Branco, 2012)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rat Young (3-4 weeks) dosed with acrylamide by gavage (5, 15, 30 mg/kg, 5 applications per week during 4 weeks)

(Tian, 2018)

 

Microdialysis probe in adult Wistar rats showed that acute exposure to methylmercury (10, 100 mM) induced an increase release of extracellular glutamate (9.8 fold at 10 mM and 2.4 fold at 100 mM). This extracellular glutamate level remained elevated at least 90 min.

(Juarez et al., 2002)

 

 

 

Rat, perinatal exposure to methylmercury (GD7-PD21, i.e. 35 days)

0.5 mg/kg bw/day in drinking water

(Roda et al., 2008)

 

 

Rat Young (3-4 weeks) exposed to acrylamide by gavage (5, 15, 30 mg/kg, 5 applications per week during 4 weeks)

(Tian, 2018)

 

 

Rat pregnant exposed to methylmercury (1.5 mg/kg orally) from GD5 till parturition                (Jacob, 2017)

 

 

 

Rat, perinatal exposure to methylmercury (GD7-PD21, i.e. 35 days)

0.5 mg/kg bw/day in drinking water

(Roda et al., 2008)

 

 

Monkeys, 6,12,18 months oral exposure

50 mg/kg bw

(Charleston et al., 1996)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mice dosed during postnatal week 1-3 with subcutaneous 2-5 mg mercury chloride/kg/once per week  (Eddins et al., 2008)

Pregnant rat dosed on GD 15 with 8 mg/kg of methylmercury by gavage. Offsprings were tested at day 16, 21 and 60. (Cagiano et al., 1990)

Rat pregnant exposed to methylmercury (1.5 mg/kg orally) from GD5 till parturition               (Jacob, 2017)

 

Mice dosed during postnatal week 1-3 with subcutaneous 2-5 mg mercury chloride/kg/once per week (Eddins et al., 2008)

Pregnant rat dosed on GD 15 with 8 mg/kg of methylmercury by gavage. Offsprings were tested at day 16, 21 and 60.     (Cagiano et al., 1990)

Rat pregnant exposed to methylmercury (1.5 mg/kg orally) from GD5 till parturition                (Jacob, 2017)

Pregnant mice received 0.5 mg methylmercury/kg/day in drinking water from gestational day 7 until day 7 after delivery. Offspring behavior was monitored at 5-15 and 26-36 weeks of age.                (Onishchenko et al., 2007)

Balb mice exposed to methylmercury in diet (low dose: 1.5 mg/kg; high dose: 4.5 mg/kg) during 11 weeks (6 weeks prior mating, 3 weeks during gestation and 2 weeks post-partum). Offsprings tested at PD 15 showed an accumulation of Hg in brain (0.08 mg/kg for low dose and 0.25 mg/kg for the high dose)                (Glover et al., 2009)

In vitro

In vitro

In vitro

In vitro

In vitro

 

 

 

Mouse primary cortical cultures exposed to 5 mM of methylmercury for 24h

(Rush, 2012)

 

MeHg inhibits ex vivo rat thioredoxin reductase; IC50 0.158 μM (cerebral),

(Wagner et al., 2010)

 

 

Mouse primary cortical cultures exposed to 5 mM of methylmercury for 24h

(Rush, 2012)

 

 

Methylmercury (2-10 µM) in synaptic vesicles isolated from rat brain (with LD50 at 50 µM ).

(Porciuncula et al., 2003)

 

 

Mouse astrocytes, neurons in mono- or co-cultures exposed to methylmercury 1-50 µM for 24h                  (Morken, 2005)

 

Methylmercury (2-10 µM) in synaptic vesicles isolated from rat brain (with LD50 at 50 µM).

(Porciuncula et al., 2003

 

Mouse astrocytes, neurons in mono- or co-cultures exposed to methylmercury 1-50 µM for 24h              (Morken, 2005)

 

3D rat brain cell cultures 10 day treatment

HgCl2 10-9-10-6M

MeHgCl 10-9-3x10-7M

(Monnet-Tschudi et al., 1996; Eskes et al., 2002)

 

 

In human in vitro

In human in vitro

 

 

 

 

In human

 

Human neuroblastoma cells (SH-SY5Y)exposed to 1 µM of methylmercury

(Branco, 2017; Franco, 2009)

 

 

 

Human neuroblastoma cells (SH-SY5Y)exposed to 1 µM of methylmercury

(Branco, 2017; Franco, 2009)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maternal peripartum hair mercury level was measured to assess prenatal mercury exposure. The concentrations of mercury was found in the range of 0.3-5.1 µg/g, similar to fish-eating population in US. Statistical analyses revealed that each ug/g increase in hair Hg was associated with a decrement in visual memory, learning and verbal memory.   (Orenstein et al., 2014)

 

 

Summary Table for Weight of evidence of KERs (Biological Plausability, Empirical support, Uncertainties)

Support for Biological Plausibility of KERs

Defining Question

Is there a mechanistic (i.e. structural or functional) relationship between KEup and KEdown consistent with established biological knowledge?

High (Strong)

Moderate

Low (Weak)

Extensive understanding of the KER based on extensive previous documentation and broad acceptance

The KER is plausible based on analogy to accept biological relationship but scientific understanding is not completely established

There is empirical support for a statistical association between KEs but the structural or functional relationship between them is not understood

MIE to KE Oxidative stress

HIGH

RATIONALE: Thiol- and selenol containing proteins, which mainly belong to the anti-oxidant protections, have a high affinity for binding soft metals such as mercury (Farina, 2011). Binding to these thiol/sulfhydryl/SH/SeH groups results in structural modifications affecting the catalytic capacity, and thereby reducing the capacity to neutralize ROS. Extensive empirical support of interfering with MIE or using anti-oxidant compounds is available. Limited conflicted data.

KE Oxidative stress to KE Glutamate (Glu) dyshomeostasis

MODERATE

RATIONALE: Due to the tight coupling of glutamate transporters with energy production, and to the important role of glutamate transporters in glutamate homeostasis, perturbations of energy metabolism such as mitochondrial dysfunction and increased production of ROS lead to glutamate dyshomeostasis  (Boron and Boulpaep, 2003). Methylmercury was shown to inhibit both the H+-ATPase activity and vesicular glutamate uptake (Porciuncula et al., 2003). As, on one hand, ROS production can interfere with glutamate uptake, and on the other hand, glutamate accumulation leads to excitotoxicity and ROS production, the exact sequence of the KER is difficult to assess. But the fact that both KEs are involved in mercury-induced neurotoxicity is broadly accepted (Farina et al., 2011; Antunes dos Santos et al., 2016; Morris et al., 2017; Kern et al., 2012).

KE Glutamate dyshomeostasis to KE Cell injury/death

HIGH

RATIONALE: Glutamate dyshomeostasis, in particular excess of glutamate in the synaptic cleft, leads to overactivation of ionotropic glutamate receptors, referred to as excitotoxicity. This, in turn, will cause cell injury/death via ROS production (see AOP 48). This KER is also inherent to the developing brain, where glutamate ionotropic receptors are expressed early in various neural cells and when NMDA receptors are expressed in neurons. There is empirical support for all three chemical initiators (mercury, acrylamide, acrolein). In addition, several experiments aiming at blocking glutamate excitotoxicity and the resulting ROS production are protective for cell injury/death. Limited conflicting data.

KE Cell injury/death to KE Neuroinflammation

MODERATE

RATIONALE: It is widely accepted that cell/neuronal injury and death lead to neuroinflammation (microglial and astrocyte reactivities) in adult brain, and in the developing brain, where neuroinflammation was observed after cell injury/death induced by excitotoxic lesions (Acarin et al., 1997; Dommergues et al., 2003). Empirical support is available for all three chemical initiators (mercury, acrylamide, acrolein).  Few experiments, showing a protection when blocking any feature of neuroinflammation have been described. There are some contradicting data showing an absence of neuroinflammatory response despite the occurrence of mercury-induced apotosis and slight behavioral alterations.

KE Neuroinflammation to KE Cell injury/death

MODERATE

RATIONALE: In vitro co-culture experiments have demonstrated that reactive glial cells (microglia and astrocytes) can kill neurons via the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-a, IL-1b and IL-6 and/or ROS/RNS (Chao et al., 1995; Brown and Bal-Price, 2003; Kraft and Harry, 2011; Taetzsch and Block, 2013) and that interventions aiming at blocking these inflammatory biomolecules can rescue the neurons (Yadav et al., 2012; Brzozowski et al., 2015). Several reports showed that modulating mercury or acrylamide-induced neuroinflammation was protective for neurons. Because of the complexity of the neuroinflammatory response, that can have neuroprotective or neurodegenerative consequences depending on the duration, local environment or still unknown factors, the rating of this KER was kept as moderate. The vicious cycle between cell injury/death and neuroinflammation is well known and was described in other AOPs. Neuroinflammation could be considered as a modulating factor, but because of the numerous inhibiting experiments, it is considered as an essential KE. Some conflicting data due to the dual role of some inflammatory mediators have been reported.

KE Cell injury/death to KE Decreased network formation and function

HIGH

RATIONALE: Neuronal network formation and functional crosstalk are established via synaptogenesis. It was shown that under physiological conditions components of the apoptotic machinery in the developing brain regulate synapse formation and neuronal connectivity (Dekkers et al., 2013). The brain’s electrical activity dependence on synapse formation is critical for proper neuronal communication. Glial cells are also involved in the establishment and stabilization of the neuronal network. Extensive experimental support for the adverse effects of mercury on synaptogenesis exist, establishing a strong link between mercury-induced apoptosis and/or neuronal loss and perturbations in a number of neurotransmitter systems (Jacob, 2017; Bridges, 2017) and perturbations of functionality (Falluel-Morel, 2007; Ferraro, 2009; Teixera, 2014; Onishchenko, 2007). Limited protective experiments and conflicting data reported.

KE Decreased network formation and function to AO Impairment in learning and memory

HIGH

RATIONALE: A review on the Morris water maze (MWM), as an investigative tool of spatial learning and memory in laboratory rats pointed out that perturbed neuronal networks rather than neuronal death per se in certain regions is responsible for the impairment in MWM performance. Functional integrated neural networks that involve the coordination action of different brain regions are consequently important for spatial learning and memory performance (D'Hooge and De Deyn, 2001). Broad empirical support showing mercury-induced effects on learning and memory as consequence of network disruption (Sokolowski et al. 2013; Eddins et al., 2008; Glover et al., 2009). Similar observations were made in humans (Orenstein et al., 2014; Yorifuji et al., 2011).  Interestingly, behavioral alterations were detected long time after exposure (delayed effects). Few conflicting data have been reported, but other behavioral deficits, such as alterations in motor activity and increased anxiety suggest that systems other than hippocampus-related learning and memory are also affected.

KE oxidative stress to KE Cell injury/death

HIGH

RATIONALE: The central nervous system is especially vulnerable to free radical damage since it has a high oxygen consumption rate, an abundant lipid content and reduced levels of antioxidant enzymes (Coyle and Puttfarcken, 1993; Markesbery, 1997). The developing nervous system is particularly vulnerable to chemical insults (Grandjean & Landrigan, 2014). One reason for this higher vulnerability is the incapacity of immature neural cells to cope with oxidative stress by increasing glutathione (GSH) production (Sandström et al., 2017). Broad empirical support for mercury and acrylamide showing an association between increased ROS production and/or decreased protection against oxidative stress and apoptosis and/or necrosis (Lu et al., 2011; Sarafian et al., 1994; Allam et al., 2011; Lakshmi et al., 2012). Anti-oxidant treatments proved to be protective. Few conflicting data, except a mercury-induced upregulation of GSH level and GR activity as an adaptive mechanism following lactational exposure to methylmercury (10 mg/L in drinking water) associated with motor deficit, suggesting neuronal impairment (Franco et al., 2006).

Quantitative Consideration

Some quantitative relationships have been described between the upstream early KEs (MIE to KE oxidative stress, Oxidative stress to Cell injury/death), although the diversity of test systems and posology (dosing/exposure amount and duration) hampers comparison between studies. It is more difficult to evaluate quantitative relationships between later downstream KEs, such as Neuroinflammation and Decreased Network Function. Neuroinflammation is a complex adaptive mechanism which is not yet completely understood; it can have neuroprotective or neurodegenerative consequences, depending on triggering signals, duration, microenvironment or other unknown influences, which may determine the outcome of the neuroinflammatory process. Decreased network function is currently difficult to quantify because quantitative technologies for mapping and understanding of brain networks (and their plasticity) are still under development.

Optimally, we would like data from a single type of test system showing that exposure to stressor, e.g. mercury, is correlated with changes in all KEs. Such models are emerging, using cells of human origin (Pamies et al., 2016; Sandström et al., 2016; Fritsche et al., 2017) or non-mammalian models, such as zebrafish (Geier et al., 2018; Padilla et al., 2018) and will allow in the future generation of quantitative data which may be used for in silico hazard prediction.

Considerations for Potential Applications of the AOP (optional)


  • Contribution to the network of KEs/AOPs on Developmental Neurotoxicity (DNT)
  • Establishing thiol/selenol binding as a MIE to enable its use in in silico modeling for prediction and in vitro hazard identification screening
  • Generating quantitative data by measuring all KEs in a single model after repeated/long term exposure to a wide concentration range of the chemical initiators to facilitate the development of computational predictive approaches

References


Acarin, L., B. González, B. Castellano and A. J. Castro (1997). "Quantitative analysis of microglial reaction to a cortical excitotoxic lesion in the early postnatal brain." Exp.Neurol. 147: 410-417.

Allam,  a et al. (2011) ‘Prenatal and perinatal acrylamide disrupts the development of cerebellum in rat: Biochemical and morphological studies.’, Toxicology and industrial health, 27, pp. 291–306. doi: 10.1177/0748233710386412.

Antunes Dos Santos, A., M. Appel Hort, M. Culbreth, C. Lopez-Granero, M. Farina, J. B. Rocha and M. Aschner (2016). "Methylmercury and brain development: A review of recent literature." J Trace Elem Med Biol 38: 99-107.

Balazs, R. (2006). "Trophic effect of glutamate." Curr Top Med Chem 6(10): 961-968.

Branco, V., J. Canario, J. Lu, A. Holmgren and C. Carvalho (2012). "Mercury and selenium interaction in vivo: effects on thioredoxin reductase and glutathione peroxidase." Free Radic Biol Med 52(4): 781-793.

Branco, V., L. Coppo, S. Sola, J. Lu, C. M. P. Rodrigues, A. Holmgren and C. Carvalho (2017). "Impaired cross-talk between the thioredoxin and glutathione systems is related to ASK-1 mediated apoptosis in neuronal cells exposed to mercury." Redox Biol 13: 278-287.

Bridges, K., Venables, B., Roberts, A., 2017. Effects of dietary methylmercury on the dopaminergic system of adult fathead minnows and their offspring. Environ Toxicol Chem 36, 1077-1084.

Brown, G. C. and A. Bal-Price (2003). "Inflammatory neurodegeneration mediated by nitric oxide, glutamate, and mitochondria." Mol Neurobiol 27(3): 325-355.

Brzozowski, M. J., P. Jenner and S. Rose (2015). "Inhibition of i-NOS but not n-NOS protects rat primary cell cultures against MPP(+)-induced neuronal toxicity." J Neural Transm 122(6): 779-788.

Cagiano, R., et al. (1990). "Evidence that exposure to methyl mercury during gestation induces behavioral and neurochemical changes in offspring of rats." Neurotoxicol Teratol 12(1): 23-28.

Carvalho, C.M.L., Lu, J., Zhang, X., Arnér, E.S.J., Holmgren, A. Effects of selenite and chelating agents on mammalian thioredoxin reductase inhibited by mercury: Implications for treatment of mercury poisoning (2011) FASEB Journal, 25 (1), pp. 370-381.

Castoldi, A. F., C. Johansson, N. Onishchenko, T. Coccini, E. Roda, M. Vahter, S. Ceccatelli and L. Manzo (2008). "Human developmental neurotoxicity of methylmercury: impact of variables and risk modifiers." Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 51(2): 201-214.

Castoldi, A. F., N. Onishchenko, C. Johansson, T. Coccini, E. Roda, M. Vahter, S. Ceccatelli and L. Manzo (2008). "Neurodevelopmental toxicity of methylmercury: Laboratory animal data and their contribution to human risk assessment." Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 51(2): 215-229.

Ceccatelli, S., R. Bose, K. Edoff, N. Onishchenko and S. Spulber (2013). "Long-lasting neurotoxic effects of exposure to methylmercury during development." J Intern Med 273(5): 490-497.

Charleston, J. S., R. L. Body, R. P. Bolender, N. K. Mottet, M. E. Vahter and T. M. Burbacher (1996). "Changes in the number of astrocytes and microglia in the thalamus of the monkey Macaca fascicularis following long-term subclinical methylmercury exposure." NeuroToxicology 17: 127-138.

Chao, C. C., S. Hu and P. K. Peterson (1995). "Glia, cytokines, and neurotoxicity." Crit.Rev.Neurobiol. 9: 189-205.

Coyle, J. and Puttfarcken, P. (1993) ‘Glutamate Toxicity’, Science, 262, pp. 689–95.

Curtis, J. T., A. N. Hood, Y. Chen, G. P. Cobb and D. R. Wallace (2010). "Chronic metals ingestion by prairie voles produces sex-specific deficits in social behavior: an animal model of autism." Behav Brain Res 213(1): 42-49.

Debes, F., E. Budtz-Jorgensen, P. Weihe, R. F. White and P. Grandjean (2006). "Impact of prenatal methylmercury exposure on neurobehavioral function at age 14 years." Neurotoxicol Teratol 28(5): 536-547.

Dekkers, M.P., Nikoletopoulou, V., Barde, Y.A., 2013. Cell biology in neuroscience: Death of developing neurons: new insights and implications for connectivity. J Cell Biol 203, 385-393.

D'Hooge R, De Deyn PP. (2001). Applications of the Morris water maze in the study of learning and memory. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 36: 60-90.

Dommergues, M. A., F. Plaisant, C. Verney and P. Gressens (2003). "Early microglial activation following neonatal excitotoxic brain damage in mice: a potential target for neuroprotection." Neuroscience 121(3): 619-628.

Eddins, D., et al. (2008). "Mercury-induced cognitive impairment in metallothionein-1/2 null mice." Neurotoxicol Teratol 30(2): 88-95.

Eskes, C., P. Honegger, L. Juillerat-Jeanneret and F. Monnet-Tschudi (2002). "Microglial reaction induced by noncytotoxic methylmercury treatment leads to neuroprotection via interactions with astrocytes and IL-6 release." Glia 37(1): 43-52.

Falluel-Morel, A., Sokolowski, K., Sisti, H.M., Zhou, X., Shors, T.J., Dicicco-Bloom, E., 2007. Developmental mercury exposure elicits acute hippocampal cell death, reductions in neurogenesis, and severe learning deficits during puberty. J Neurochem 103, 1968-1981.

Farina, M., J. B. Rocha and M. Aschner (2011). "Mechanisms of methylmercury-induced neurotoxicity: evidence from experimental studies." Life Sci 89(15-16): 555-563.

Ferraro, L., Tomasini, M.C., Tanganelli, S., Mazza, R., Coluccia, A., Carratu, M.R., Gaetani, S., Cuomo, V., Antonelli, T., 2009. Developmental exposure to methylmercury elicits early cell death in the cerebral cortex and long-term memory deficits in the rat. Int J Dev Neurosci 27, 165-174.

Featherstone, D. E. (2010). "Intercellular glutamate signaling in the nervous system and beyond." ACS Chem Neurosci 1(1): 4-12.

Fombonne, E. (2005). "Epidemiology of autistic disorder and other pervasive developmental disorders." J Clin Psychiatry 66 Suppl 10: 3-8.

Franco, J. L. et al. (2006) ‘Cerebellar thiol status and motor deficit after lactational exposure to methylmercury’, Environmental Research, 102(1), pp. 22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2006.02.003.

Franco, J. L., T. Posser, P. R. Dunkley, P. W. Dickson, J. J. Mattos, R. Martins, A. C. Bainy, M. R. Marques, A. L. Dafre and M. Farina (2009). "Methylmercury neurotoxicity is associated with inhibition of the antioxidant enzyme glutathione peroxidase." Free Radic Biol Med 47(4): 449-457.

Fritsche, E., Crofton, K.M., Hernandez, A.F., Hougaard Bennekou, S., Leist, M., Bal-Price, A., Reaves, E., Wilks, M.F., Terron, A., Solecki, R., Sachana, M.,Gourmelon, A., 2017b. OECD/EFSA workshop on developmental neurotoxicity (DNT): The use of non-animal test methods for regulatory purposes. ALTEX 34, 311-315.

Fujimura, M. and F. Usuki (2017). "In situ different antioxidative systems contribute to the site-specific methylmercury neurotoxicity in mice." Toxicology 392: 55-63.

Geier, M.C., Minick, D. J., Truong, L., Tilton, S., Anderson, K.A., Tanguay, R.L., 2018. Systematic developmental neurotoxicity assessment of a representative PAH Superfund mixture using zebrafish. TAAP DNT Special Issue (Submitted).

Gilbert, J. and H. Y. Man (2017). "Fundamental Elements in Autism: From Neurogenesis and Neurite Growth to Synaptic Plasticity." Front Cell Neurosci 11: 359.

Glover, C. N., et al. (2009). "Methylmercury speciation influences brain gene expression and behavior in gestationally-exposed mice pups." Toxicol Sci 110(2): 389-400.

Grandjean, P. and P. J. Landrigan (2006). "Developmental neurotoxicity of industrial chemicals." Lancet 368(9553): 2167-2178.

Grandjean, P. and Landrigan, P. J. (2014) ‘Neurobehavioural effects of developmental toxicity’, The Lancet Neurology, 13(3), pp. 330–338. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70278-3.

Hallmayer, J., S. Cleveland, A. Torres, J. Phillips, B. Cohen, T. Torigoe, J. Miller, A. Fedele, J. Collins, K. Smith, L. Lotspeich, L. A. Croen, S. Ozonoff, C. Lajonchere, J. K. Grether and N. Risch (2011). "Genetic heritability and shared environmental factors among twin pairs with autism." Arch Gen Psychiatry 68(11): 1095-1102.

Jacob, S., Thangarajan, S., 2017. Effect of Gestational Intake of Fisetin (3,3',4',7-Tetrahydroxyflavone) on Developmental Methyl Mercury Neurotoxicity in F1 Generation Rats. Biol Trace Elem Res 177, 297-315.

Jafari, T., N. Rostampour, A. A. Fallah and A. Hesami (2017). "The association between mercury levels and autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis." J Trace Elem Med Biol 44: 289-297.

Joshi, D., M. D. Kumar, S. A. Kumar and S. Sangeeta (2014). "Reversal of methylmercury-induced oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, and DNA damage by the treatment of N-acetyl cysteine: a protective approach." J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 33(2): 167-182.

Juarez, B. I., M. L. Martinez, M. Montante, L. Dufour, E. Garcia and M. E. Jimenez-Capdeville (2002). "Methylmercury increases glutamate extracellular levels in frontal cortex of awake rats." Neurotoxicol Teratol 24(6): 767-771.

Kern, J. K., D. A. Geier, L. K. Sykes, B. E. Haley and M. R. Geier (2016). "The relationship between mercury and autism: A comprehensive review and discussion." J Trace Elem Med Biol 37: 8-24.

Kraft, A. D. and G. J. Harry (2011). "Features of microglia and neuroinflammation relevant to environmental exposure and neurotoxicity." Int J Environ Res Public Health 8(7): 2980-3018.

Lakshmi, D. et al. (2012) ‘Ameliorating effect of fish oil on acrylamide induced oxidative stress and neuronal apoptosis in cerebral cortex’, Neurochemical Research, 37(9), pp. 1859–1867. doi: 10.1007/s11064-012-0794-1.

Lam, H. S., K. M. Kwok, P. H. Chan, H. K. So, A. M. Li, P. C. Ng and T. F. Fok (2013). "Long term neurocognitive impact of low dose prenatal methylmercury exposure in Hong Kong." Environ Int 54: 59-64.

Landa, R. J. (2008). "Diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders in the first 3 years of life." Nat Clin Pract Neurol 4(3): 138-147.

Li, D., H. O. Karnath and X. Xu (2017). "Candidate Biomarkers in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Review of MRI Studies." Neurosci Bull 33(2): 219-237.

Li, H., H. Li, Y. Li, Y. Liu and Z. Zhao (2018). "Blood Mercury, Arsenic, Cadmium, and Lead in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder." Biol Trace Elem Res 181(1): 31-37.

Loke, Y. J., A. J. Hannan and J. M. Craig (2015). "The Role of Epigenetic Change in Autism Spectrum Disorders." Front Neurol 6: 107.

Lu, T. H. et al. (2011) ‘Involvement of oxidative stress-mediated ERK1/2 and p38 activation regulated mitochondria-dependent apoptotic signals in methylmercury-induced neuronal cell injury’, Toxicology Letters. Elsevier Ireland Ltd, 204(1), pp. 71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.04.013.

Markesbery, W. R. (1997) ‘Oxidative stress hypothesis in Alzheimer’s disease’, Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 23(1), pp. 134–147. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(96)00629-6.

Meinerz, D. F., M. T. de Paula, B. Comparsi, M. U. Silva, A. E. Schmitz, H. C. Braga, P. S. Taube, A. L. Braga, J. B. Rocha, A. L. Dafre, M. Farina, J. L. Franco and T. Posser (2011). "Protective effects of organoselenium compounds against methylmercury-induced oxidative stress in mouse brain mitochondrial-enriched fractions." Braz J Med Biol Res 44(11): 1156-1163.

Monnet-Tschudi, F., M. G. Zurich and P. Honegger (1996). "Comparison of the developmental effects of two mercury compounds on glial cells and neurons in aggregate cultures of rat telencephalon." Brain Res 741(1-2): 52-59.

Morken, T.S., Sonnewald, U., Aschner, M., Syversen, T., 2005. Effects of methylmercury on primary brain cells in mono- and co-culture. Toxicol Sci 87, 169-175.

Morris, G., B. K. Puri, R. E. Frye and M. Maes (2017). "The Putative Role of Environmental Mercury in the Pathogenesis and Pathophysiology of Autism Spectrum Disorders and Subtypes." Mol Neurobiol.

Mostafa, G. A., G. Bjorklund, M. A. Urbina and L. Y. Al-Ayadhi (2016). "The levels of blood mercury and inflammatory-related neuropeptides in the serum are correlated in children with autism spectrum disorder." Metab Brain Dis 31(3): 593-599.

Mutter, J., J. Naumann, C. Sadaghiani, R. Schneider and H. Walach (2004). "Alzheimer disease: mercury as pathogenetic factor and apolipoprotein E as a moderator." Neuro Endocrinol Lett 25(5): 331-339.

National Research Council. 2000. Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9899.

Oliveira, C. S., B. C. Piccoli, M. Aschner and J. B. T. Rocha (2017). "Chemical Speciation of Selenium and Mercury as Determinant of Their Neurotoxicity." Adv Neurobiol 18: 53-83.

Onishchenko, N., Tamm, C., Vahter, M., Hokfelt, T., Johnson, J.A., Johnson, D.A., Ceccatelli, S., 2007. Developmental exposure to methylmercury alters learning and induces depression-like behavior in male mice. Toxicol Sci 97, 428-437.

Orenstein, S. T., et al. (2014). "Prenatal organochlorine and methylmercury exposure and memory and learning in school-age children in communities near the New Bedford Harbor Superfund site, Massachusetts." Environ Health Perspect 122(11): 1253-1259.

Padilla, S., Culbreth, M., Deborah, L.H., Olin, J., Jarema, K., Jensen, K., Tennant, A., 2018. Reviewer Selection Summary - Screening for Developmental Neurotoxicity Using Larval Zebrafish: Assessing the Preparation and the Predictive Capability. TAAP DNT Special Issue (Submitted).

Pamies, D., P. Barreras, K. Block, G. Makri, A. Kumar, D. Wiersma, L. Smirnova, C. Zang, J. Bressler, K. M. Christian, G. Harris, G. L. Ming, C. J. Berlinicke, K. Kyro, H. Song, C. A. Pardo, T. Hartung and H. T. Hogberg (2017). "A human brain microphysiological system derived from induced pluripotent stem cells to study neurological diseases and toxicity." ALTEX 34(3): 362-376.

Park, S. T., K. T. Lim, Y. T. Chung and S. U. Kim (1996). "Methylmercury-induced neurotoxicity in cerebral neuron culture is blocked by antioxidants and NMDA receptor antagonists." NeuroToxicology 17: 37-46.

Porciuncula, L. O., J. B. Rocha, R. G. Tavares, G. Ghisleni, M. Reis and D. O. Souza (2003). "Methylmercury inhibits glutamate uptake by synaptic vesicles from rat brain." Neuroreport 14(4): 577-580.

Roda, E., T. Coccini, D. Acerbi, A. Castoldi, G. Bernocchi and L. Manzo (2008). "Cerebellum cholinergic muscarinic receptor (subtype-2 and -3) and cytoarchitecture after developmental exposure to methylmercury: an immunohistochemical study in rat." J Chem Neuroanat 35(3): 285-294.

Rush, T., X. Liu, A. B. Nowakowski, D. H. Petering and D. Lobner (2012). "Glutathione-mediated neuroprotection against methylmercury neurotoxicity in cortical culture is dependent on MRP1." Neurotoxicology 33(3): 476-481.

Ruszkiewicz, J. A., A. B. Bowman, M. Farina, J. B. T. Rocha and M. Aschner (2016). "Sex- and structure-specific differences in antioxidant responses to methylmercury during early development." Neurotoxicology 56: 118-126.

Saghazadeh, A. and N. Rezaei (2017). "Systematic review and meta-analysis links autism and toxic metals and highlights the impact of country development status: Higher blood and erythrocyte levels for mercury and lead, and higher hair antimony, cadmium, lead, and mercury." Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 79(Pt B): 340-368.

Sakamoto, M., K. Miyamoto, Z. Wu and H. Nakanishi (2008). "Possible involvement of cathepsin B released by microglia in methylmercury-induced cerebellar pathological changes in the adult rat." Neurosci Lett 442(3): 292-296.

Sandström, J. et al. (2016) ‘Toxicology in Vitro Development and characterization of a human embryonic stem cell-derived 3D neural tissue model for neurotoxicity testing’, Tiv, pp. 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2016.10.001.

Santhanasabapathy, R., S. Vasudevan, K. Anupriya, R. Pabitha and G. Sudhandiran (2015). "Farnesol quells oxidative stress, reactive gliosis and inflammation during acrylamide-induced neurotoxicity: Behavioral and biochemical evidence." Neuroscience 308: 212-227.

Sarafian, T. A. et al. (1994) ‘Bcl-2 Expression Decreases Methyle Mercury-Induced Free-Radical Generation and Cel Killing in a Neural Cell Line’, Toxicol. Lett., 74(2), pp. 149–155.

Sokolowski, K., A. Falluel-Morel, X. Zhou and E. DiCicco-Bloom (2011). "Methylmercury (MeHg) elicits mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis in developing hippocampus and acts at low exposures." Neurotoxicology 32(5): 535-544.

Sokolowski, K., M. Obiorah, K. Robinson, E. McCandlish, B. Buckley and E. DiCicco-Bloom (2013). "Neural stem cell apoptosis after low-methylmercury exposures in postnatal hippocampus produce persistent cell loss and adolescent memory deficits." Dev Neurobiol 73(12): 936-949.

Sorg, O., B. Schilter, P. Honegger and F. Monnet-Tschudi (1998). "Increased Vulnerability of Neurones and Glial Cells to low Concentrations of Methylmercury in a Prooxidant Situation." Acta Neuropathol. 96: 621-627.

Taetzsch, T. and M. L. Block (2013). "Pesticides, microglial NOX2, and Parkinson's disease." J Biochem Mol Toxicol 27(2): 137-149.

Teixeira, F.B., Fernandes, R.M., Farias-Junior, P.M., Costa, N.M., Fernandes, L.M., Santana, L.N., Silva-Junior, A.F., Silva, M.C., Maia, C.S., Lima, R.R., 2014. Evaluation of the effects of chronic intoxication with inorganic mercury on memory and motor control in rats. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11, 9171-9185.

Tian, S.M., Ma, Y.X., Shi, J., Lou, T.Y., Liu, S.S., Li, G.Y., 2015. Acrylamide neurotoxicity on the cerebrum of weaning rats. Neural Regen Res 10, 938-943.

Vahter, M., A. Akesson, C. Liden, S. Ceccatelli and M. Berglund (2007). "Gender differences in the disposition and toxicity of metals." Environ Res 104(1): 85-95.

Wagner, C., Sudati, J.H., Nogueira, C.W., Rocha, J.B.T. (2010) In vivo and in vitro inhibition of mice thioredoxin reductase by methylmercury (2010) BioMetals, 23 (6), pp. 1171-1177.

Yadav, S., S. P. Gupta, G. Srivastava, P. K. Srivastava and M. P. Singh (2012). "Role of secondary mediators in caffeine-mediated neuroprotection in maneb- and paraquat-induced Parkinson's disease phenotype in the mouse." Neurochem Res 37(4): 875-884.

Yorifuji, T., et al. (2011). "Long-term exposure to methylmercury and psychiatric symptoms in residents of Minamata, Japan." Environ Int 37(5): 907-913.

Zhang, Y., V. J. Bolivar and D. A. Lawrence (2013). "Maternal exposure to mercury chloride during pregnancy and lactation affects the immunity and social behavior of offspring." Toxicol Sci 133(1): 101-111.

 


Appendix 1

List of MIEs in this AOP

Event: 1487: Binding, SH/seleno proteins

Short Name: Binding, SH/seleno proteins

Stressors

Name
Methylmercuric(II) chloride
Acrylamide
Acrolein

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Molecular

Evidence for Perturbation by Stressor


Overview for Molecular Initiating Event

Interferences of the chemical initiators with SH-/seleno-containing proteins

Mercury

MeHg can interact with different functional groups found abundantly in biomolecules (e.g., carboxylate, primary and secondary amine groups, etc; Rabestein 1978a); however, its affinity for thiol and selenol groups are 6 to 12 orders of magnitude superior to that for hard nucleophile centers found in biomolecules (Table 1). The constants described in Table 1 indicate that MeHg behaves as a strong soft electrophile, i.e., it has much higher affinity for the soft nucleophiles centers of thiol- and selenol-containing molecules (Pearson, 1963; Rabestein 1978; Arnold et al. 1986; Sugiura et al., 1976; 1978), than for hard nucleophiles centers found in the functional groups of proteins, RNA, DNA, carbohydrates and lipids (Rabeinstein, 1978a).  Furthermore, the rate constant for the reaction of MeHg with thiol/thiolate (R-SH/R-S-) has been estimated to be about 6 x 108 M-1.sec-1, which indicates a very fast reaction (Rabenstein and Fairhurst, 1975).  As corollary, the occurrence of free MeHg or bound to other ligands such as carboxylates, amines, chloride or hydroxyl anions in the physiological media of living cells is insignificant or nonexistent (George et al. 2008). The binding of MeHg to abundant low molecular mass thiols or LMM-SH (e.g., cysteine and reduced glutathione-GSH) and high molecular thiol-containing proteins or HMM-SH (e.g., albumin, hemoglobin, etc) is critical for the MeHg distribution from non-target to target organs and cells (Farina et al. 2017).

Table 1 - Affinity constants of methylmercury for important chemical groups found in biomolecules (adapted from a Rabestein, 1978, Rabestein and Bravob using different thiol-containing molecules with the arylmercurial para-mercurybenzenosulfonate,  and cIsab 1991; and from dArnold et al. 1986 taking into consideration that the calculated formation constant of –Se-MeHg conjugates was 0.1 to 1.2 order greater than that of –S-MeHg). The values represent the Log of the constants.

 

Functional Group

 

Occurrence

Formation constant

Carboxyl/Carboxylate (-COOH/-COO-)

Amino acids, proteins, fatty acid

≈2.5-3.0a

Amino or primary amine (-NH2/-NH3+)

Amino acids, proteins, nitrogenous bases, nucleosides, nucleotides

≈7.0-8.0 a

Secundary amine

(-NH)

Amino acids, proteins, nitrogenous bases, nucleosides, nucleotides

≈7.0-9.0 a

Thioester (-S-)

Methionine

≈2.0 a

Thiol/thiolate (-SH/-S-)

Cysteine, glutathione, proteins

≈14-18 a,b

Thiol/thiolate (-SH/-S-)

Captopril

≈16-17c

Selenol/selenolate  (-SeH/Se-)

Selenocysteinyl residues in selenoproteins

≈ 16-18d

   

 

Here we will not discuss factors that can modify MeHg distribution, specifically, we will assume that MeHg-S conjugates reach the mitochondria, where MeHg will bind to thiol- and selenol-containing proteins via the exchange reactions of MeHg from one –SH to another –SH or –SeH groups  (Figure 1; Rabenstein 1978b; Rabenstein and Fairhurst, 1975; Rabenstein et al., 1974; 1982; Rabenstein and Reid, 1984; Farina et al. 2011, 2017; Dórea et al. 2013). But we have to emphasize that what we call of binding to –SH or –SeH groups is, in fact, an exchange reaction of MeHg from MeHg-S conjugates (e.g., MeHg-cysteine or MeHg-Cys and MeHg-glutathione or MeHg-SG conjugates; Figure 1) to  a free thiol- or selenol-group from non-target or target proteins (Figure 1). Thus, the interaction of MeHg with its target proteins in the brain usually involves the exchange of MeHg from LMM-S-conjugate to a thiol or selenol group in different types of proteins. The Molecular Initiating Event  (MIE) of targeting thiol- or selenol-groups in mitochondrial brain proteins is expected to start a cascade of related events, which will culminate in mitochondrial failure, oxidative stress, thiol depletion, glutamate dyshomeostasis, inflammation, cell death and learning disabilities (Wormser et al. 2012; Roos et al. 2012; Ciccatelli et al. 2010; Montgomery et al. 2008, Stringari et al. 208)

Figure 1 – Binding of MeHg (CH3Hg+) to target thiol- (HMM-SH) or selenol-containing proteins (HMM-SeH). Note that, in fact, the binding of MeHg to their high molecular mass target proteins is mediated by exchange reactions of MeHg from low molecular mass thiol (LMM-SH) molecules to HMM-SH (represented by Prot-SH) or HMM-SeH (represented by Prot-SeH). The scheme also demonstrated that MeHg conjugated with one LMM-SH (here represented by either Cys1-SHgCH3 or G1SHgCH3) can exchange with others LMM-SH (here represented by Cys2-SH or G2SH). After one exchange reaction, the conjugated Cys1-SHgCH3 and G1SHgCH3 release the free LMM-SH molecules Cys1-SH or G1SH. This type of exchange reaction can also occur in the extracellular space.

In view of the strong affinity of MeHg for thiol-groups and the relative high abundance of LMM-SH molecules over HMM-SH and high molecular mass selenol containing proteins (HMM-SeH) (Table 2), the probability of finding MeHg molecules bound to LMM-SH molecules is high. In fact, at physiological pH, the affinity (constant formation) of MeHg with GSH or hemoglobin was higher for GSH than hemoglobin  (about 1 order of magnitude, Reid and Rabestein, 1982). However, the studies performed by professor Dallas Rabestein have clearly demonstrated that MeHg can migrate rapidly/easily from one LMM-SH to either other LMM-SH or HMM-SH groups and vice and verse (Rabenstein 1978b; Rabenstein and Fairhurst, 1975; Rabenstein et al., 1974; 1982; Rabenstein and Reid, 1984; Arnold et al. 1986; Farina et al. 2011, 2017; Dórea et al. 2013).  The studies of Rabenstein and others have also pointed out that the affinity of MeHg for –SeH groups is higher than for analog –SH groups (Sugira et al. 1976; 1978; Arnold et al. 1986). Thus, one would guess that –SeH-containing molecules (i.e., selenoproteins) should be the preferential targets for MeHg (Farina et al. 2011). Although this can be the case, the great abundance of –SH-containing molecules over the very limited occurrence of selenoproteins (-SeH groups) and the potential change in the reactivity of specific –SH groups at the microenvironment of thiol-containing proteins, made the picture a little more complicate. Despite of this, several studies have demonstrate that the selenoenzymes glutathione peroxidase (GPx), thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) and 5′-deiodinase (DIO) can be inhibited after in vitro and in vivo exposure to MeHg (Li et al. 2008; Carvalho et al., 2008; 2011, Farina et al.,  2009; Franco et al., 2009; Wagner et al., 2010; Branco et al., 2011; 2012; 2014, 2017; Dalla Corte et al., 2013; Meinerz et al., 2017)

Table 2 – Occurrence of Soft Nucleophilic Centers (SNC) that can bind the Soft Electrophile Methylmercury (MeHg) with high affinity. The thiol (-SH) groups can be found in thousands of proteins and in a few low molecular mass molecules. In constrast, the selenol (-SeH) group is found only in a few number of selenoproteins.

 

Thiol-containing proteins - High molecular mass thiol molecules

 

–Cysteinyl residues (Cys)

Occurrence                                          

Concentration

in thousands of proteins

pmol/L-mmol/La

 

Selenoproteins - High molecular mass selenol molecules

 

–Selenocysteinyl residues (Sec)

Occurrence

Concentration

in few dozens of proteins

fmol/L-µmol/Lb

 

Low molecular mass thiol molecules (-SH)

Occurrence

Concentration

Cysteine

glutathione (GSH)

homocysteine

 

µmol/L-mmol/L

 

Low molecular mass selenol molecules (-SeH)

Occurrence

 

Selenocysteine/selenocystine

negligible

aThe exact concentration of thiol-containing proteins is not well characterized (except for hemoglobin and albumin, which have reactive cysteinyl residues in the mmol/L range.) The pmol/L is an estimation. bThe actual concentrations of selenoproteins have not been well characterized and the presented range is an estimation.

The binding of MeHg to the –SH or –SeH groups of proteins can directly inactivate their function or can indirectly facilitate the denaturation of the proteins even after the exchanging or transference of MeHg to another LMM-SH, HMM-SH or HMM-SeH  molecules (Farina et al. 2011; Farina et al. 2017). The hypothetical types of interactions between LMM-S-MeHg conjugates with thiol- and selenol-containing proteins (HMM-SH or HMM-SeH molecules) is depicted in Figure 2.   As commented above, the binding of MeHg to redox sensitive thiol- or selenol-groups can disrupt the activity of enzymes or the biochemical role of non-enzymatic brain proteins. Some examples of thiol- and selenol-containing brain enzymes that have been reported to be disrupted after MeHg exposure are presented in Tables 3 and 4Table 5 shows some of the mitochondrial processes that can be disturbed by MeHg.

Figure 2 – Hypothetical Binding of MeHg to different types of target proteins. The binding of MeHg to proteins can cause either a transitory inhibition of the protein fucntion (first line, the yellow protein was reactivated by interacting with LMM-SH or R-SH). The pink protein is an example of protein that after the binding of MeHg suffered a change in the structure in a such way that it cannot be reactivated by LMM-SH or R-SH.  The third protein (blue) is an example of protein that was permanently denaturated after MeHg binding and even after the removal of MeHg the activity was not recovered. The same type of interactions can be applied to the selenol-containing proteins (i.e., the selenoproteins). Here we have not included the non-targets proteins or thiol-containing proteins that can bind MeHg without interfering in the protein function.

 

Table 3 – Examples of thiol- and selenol-containing proteins that are inhibited by MeHg

Protein (complex) activity inhibited by MeHg

 

exposure

Functional group

 

organism

 

 

Creatine Kinase (CK)

 

in vitro

-SH

 

Adult mice cerebral cortex

C6 glioma cells

 

50-1500 µM -IC50=87 µM

1-50 µM -IC50≈50 µM

 

Glasser et al. 2010b

 

Total GPx

 

 

 

 

 

in vitro

 

 

-SeH

 

 

SH-SY5Y cells

 

0.5-2.0 µM Max. Inh.≈40%

 

Franco et al. 2009

Mouse  neuroblastoma

2.5 - 5.0  µM (24h)   Max. Inh.≈15-40%

Kromidas et al. 1990

PC12 cells

1.0-7.5 µM (24h) –  Max. Inh.≈7%

Li et al. 2008

Rat Fetal Telenchepalic cells

Aggregating immature and mature cells  (Cu2+ +ascorbate) + 1-100 nM MeHg

Sorg et al. 1998

 

Cytoplasmic TrxR

 

 

 

 

 

Nuclear TrxR

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cytoplasmic Gpx

 

 

in vivo

 

 

mice (gestacional and lactacional)

 

22 days-old C57BL/6J mice – 5 mg/L

cerebrum- male ¯

cerebrum- female ­

cerebellum- male ¯

cerebrum- female =

 

cerebrum- female =

cerebrum- male ¯

 

cerebellum- female =

cerebellum male  ¯

 

 

 

cerebrum- male ¯

cerebrum- female ­

cerebellum- male =

cerebellum- female =

 

 

Ruszkiewicz et al. 2016

 

GPx1

 

 

 

 

GPx4

 

 

 

TrxR

 

in vivo

 

-SeH

 

Adult Swiss male  mice-

 

 

21 days - 40 mg/L water

 

Cerebellum (immunocontent and activity) ¯

Cortex (activity) ¯

 

Cerebellum (immunocontent and activity) ¯

Cortex (immunocontent and activity) ¯

 

 

Cerebellum (activity)¯

Cortex (activity)¯

 

 

Zemolin et al. 2012

Total GPx

 

in vivo

 

 

-SeH

 

Adult Swiss mice-cerebellum

21 days - 40 mg/L water

male ¯

female=

Malagutti et al. 2009

1-, 11-, 21-day old mice (brain)

gestational exposure (1,3 or 10 mg/L water)

≈29, 84 or280 µg MeHg/day/dam

 

Stringari et al. 2008

Adult rat brain

5 or 10 mg/kg MeHg – 7 days

Cheng et al. 2005

Thioredoxin Reductase (TrxR)

 

in vivo

-SeH  and –SH

 

 

Adult rat brain

 

21 days - 5 mg/kg

 

Dalla Corte et al. 2012

in vitro

-SeH  and –SH

Adult mice brain

50-1.000 nM-IC50≈100 nM

Wagner et al. 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

Type 2 5′-deiodinase (DIO2)

 

in vitro

-SeH

NB41A3 neuroblastoma cells

10-100 nM -IC50≈30 nM

Mori et al. 2006

in vitro

-SeH

Pituitary tumors GH3 cells

0.3-3 µM -IC50≈0.3-1.0  µM

Mori et al. 2007

Glutamine synthetase

in vitro

 

 

 

 

in vivo

-SH

Hypocampus  6-wk-old male ICR mice

Adult male Sprague/Dawley rats

Frontal cortex (0.1-100 µM -IC50≈50 µM)

Hippocampus  (0.1-100 µM -IC50≈50 µM)

Cerebellum  (0.1-100 µM -IC50≈20 µM)

 

6-wk-old ICR mice (2,4 and 10 mg/kg, i.p., once)

Hippocampus -  inhibition (12,17 and 21%)

 

 

 

Kwon and Park 2003[FT1] 

 

Ca2+-ATPase

 

in vitro

 

-SH

 

Adult rat brain microsomes

 

0.5-10 µM-IC50≈4 µM (Ca2+-uptake and ATP hydrolysis)

 

Freitas et al. 1996

 

Table 4 – Some mitochondrial thiol- or selenol-containing proteins that are inhibited by MeHg

Mitochondrial creatine kinase (mtCK)

in vivo

-SH

Adult Swiss male mice

21 days - 40 mg/L water

Glasser et al. 2010a; 2014

Complex I      

in vivo

-SH

Adult Swiss male mice, cerebral cortex

21 days - 40 mg/L water

Glasser et al. 2010a; 2013

Complex II

in vivo

-SH

Adult Swiss male mice, cerebral cortex

 

Adult male rats

21 days - 40 mg/L water

 

5 days, 10 mg/kg, p.o., cerebellum

Glasser et al. 2010a; 2013

Mori et al. 2011

Succinate dehydratase

in vivo

-SH

Adult Swiss male mice

Brain and spinal cord, 7 days, 1 mg/kg, s.c.

Bapu et al. 2003

Complex III

in vivo

-SH

Adult Swiss male mice, cerebral cortex  

21 days - 40 mg/L water

Glasser et al. 2010a; 2013

Complex IV

in vivo

-SH

Adult Swiss male mice, cerebral cortex  

21 days - 40 mg/L water

Glasser et al. 2010a; 2013

Mitochondrial total GPx

in vivo

-SeH

Adult rats

5 days – 10 mg/kg, p.o., cerebellum and cerebrum

Mori et al. 2007

Mitochondrial total GPx

in vivo

-SeH

Adult Swiss male mice brain

21 days - 40 mg/L water

Franco et al. 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 5– Mitochondrial processes that are disrupted by MeHg exposure and can be associated with over-production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxidative stress (OS).

Process

disrupted

 

 

Functional group

 

organism-preparation

 

 

MTT reduction

 

in vitro

-SH

Stratiatal synaptosomes male rats

 

7 day-old (0.5-10 µM -IC50≈5 µM)

14 day-old (0.5-10 µM -IC50≈5 µM)

21 day-old (0.5-10 µM -IC50≈5 µM)

2-3 month-old (0.5-10 µM -IC50≈8 µM)

 

Dreiem et al. 2005

 

 

2-3 month old (1-10 µM -IC50≈7.5 µM)

 

Dreiem & Seegal, 2007

 

C6 glioma cells

 

 

IC50 between 1-10 µM (3-24 h exposure)

 

Belletti et al. 2002

 

in vivo

Adult male rat (brain)

 

21 days, 5 mg/kg; i.p.

 

Dalla Corte et al. 2013

 

DYm (mitochondrial membrane potential)

in vitro

-SH

Stratiatal synaptosomes male rats

7 day-old (0.5-2.5 µM -IC50≈0.3 µM)

14 day-old (0.5-2.5 µM -IC50≈0.4 µM)

21 day-old (0.5-2.5 µM -IC50≈0.6 µM)

2-3 month-old (0.5-2.5 µM -IC50≈0.6 µM)

 

 

Dreiem et al. 2005

 

Cerebellar granule cells  (Marty and Atchison, 1997).

 

7-day-old Sprague–Dawley rats (0.5 µM – total collapse of DYm in 25 min

 

Limke and Atchison, 2002

 

Astrocytes

 

1,5 and 10  µM – 15-40% collapse of DYm (1-6h)

 

Yin et al. 2007

 

P19 murine embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells

 

1.5  µM –50% DYm collapse after 50 min

 

Polunas et al. 2011

Day 5 P19-derived neurons

1.5  µM –50% DYm collapse after 20 min

Ultrastructural changes consistent with an inhibition of

mitochondrial respiration

in vivo

 

 

in vivo

 

 

-SH and –SeH

 

 

-SH and     –SeH

 

Sprague-Dawley rats cerebral cortex

1.5 mg/kg day 2 to 50 (each 48h)

O’Kusky (1983)

Number of Mitochondria

and ultrastructure

Adult Swiss male mice

21 days-40 mg/L water         

Glasser et al. 2014

Oxygen consumption

Adult rats

5 days – 10 mg/kg, p.o., cerebellum

Mori et al. 2007

 

In short, the stable or transitory interaction (binding) of MeHg with critical thiol and selenol groups in target enzymes can disrupt the biological function of different types of enzymes (Table 3). In addition to enzymes, MeHg can disrupt the physiological activity of transporters and receptors.  As indicated in Table 3, mitochondrial and non-mitochondrial  oxidoreductases containing thiol and selenol redox centers have been reported to be disrupted by MeHg.  The dysregulation of cerebral glutathione (GSH and GSSG) and thioredoxin [Trx(SH)2]  systems by MeHg (Farina et al. 2011; Branco et al. 2017) can impair the fine cellular redox balance via disruption of sensitive cysteinyl- or thiol-containing proteins (Go and Jones, 2013; Go et al. 2015; Jones 2015).

 

Acrylamide and Acrolein

         Acrylamide and acrolein are a,β-unsaturated (conjugated) reactive molecule, which can react with thiol (-SH) and amino (-NH2) groups in proteins proteins (LoPachin, 2004; LoPachin et al. 2007; 2009; 2011;  Friedman, 2003; Bent et al. 2016; Martyniuk et al.2011; LoPachin and Gavin, 2014 ). However, the rate constant for the reaction between acrylamide with thiol/thiolate groups are much lower than that for MeHg (Table x).  The rate of reaction of these compounds with HMM-SH and LMM-SH is slow but can occur under physiological conditions (Tong et al. 2004; LoPachin, 2004). The inhibition of brain enzyme by acrylamide have been studied and the inhibition caused by acrylamide in some HMM-SH can be reversible  (Howland et al. 1980 ). Despite of this, we can infer that some targets of MeHg and acrylamide and acrolein can overlap.  Accordingly, some targets reported in Table 3 for MeHg have also been shown to be inhibited after exposure to acrylamide (Yousef and Demerdash, 2006; Lapadula et al. 1989; Kopańska et al. 2015). Of particular toxicological significance, both MeHg, acrylamide and acrolein have been reported to change the normal dynamic of synaptic function via interaction with specific HMM-SH (LoPachin et al. 2004 ; Farina et al. 2017).  Acrylamide can also be metabolized to an epoxide intermediate (glycidamide), which can also form adducts with cysteinyl residues in HMM-SH target proteins (Bergmark et al. 1991).

Table 6-Second order rate constants for the reaction of MeHg Acrylamide and acrolein with thiol/thiolate groups of biomolecules

Electrophile

Thiol/thiolate source

Rate constant

 

MeHg

GSH

≈6.0 x 108 M-1.sec-1

 

Acrylamide

Human serum albumin

≈5.4 x 10-3 M-1.sec-1

 

 

GSH

≈0.15-2.1 x 10-2 M-1.sec-1

 

 

N-acetylcysteine

≈0.2-3.2 x 10-3 M-1.sec-1

 

 

GADPH (Cys152)

≈5.3 x 10-2M-1.sec-1

 

Acrolein

GADPH (Cys152)

≈3.0 x 102 M-1.sec-1

 

 

N-acetylcysteine

≈2.15 M-1.sec-1

 

 

 

 

 

   

GADPH-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase



Domain of Applicability


Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
rat Rattus norvegicus NCBI
mouse Mus musculus NCBI
zebra fish Danio rerio NCBI
human Homo sapiens NCBI
Gallus gallus Gallus gallus NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
During brain development, adulthood and aging High
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Unspecific High

Key Event Description

Thiol (SH)- and seleno-containing proteins are located in different organelles and in the cytoplasm of the different neural cell types (Comini, 2016; Hoppe et al. 2008; Barbosa et al. 2017; Zhu et al. 2017). Binding of chemicals to these proteins induces either their inactivation or favor their degradation and/or inhibition of their synthesis (Farina et al. 2009; Zemolin et al. 2012). Therefore, we will directly include in the description of this MIE and of the protein of interest the main chemicals (mercury, acrylamide and acrolein) able to bind and to interfere with these proteins. (See Evidences for perturbations of this MIE by stressors)


How it is Measured or Detected

The interference of MeHg, acrylamide and acrolein  with the normal catalytic function of thiol- or selenol-containing enzymes, transporters, channels, etc can be determined by different analytical methodologies. The activity of enzymes are typically determined by spectrophotometric, spectrofluorometric  or radiometrical methodologies that quantify the rate of product appearance or the disappearance of  substrate. The examples of HMM-SH or HMM-SeH enzymes that are altered by MeHg, acrylamide and acrolein presented in Table 3 (Table 3 and 4) are normally determined by spectrophotometric methodologies. Below we give a brief description on how to measure the enzymes listed in Table(s) 3 and 4.

Creatine Kinase (CK). CK activity can be measured using phosphocreatine and ADP as substrates. The formed creatine is estimated colorimetrically  at 520 nm as described by Hughes (Hughes, 1962).

Glutathione (GSH): Total glutathione level was determined using the Glutathione Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, CS0260) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantity of GSH was assessed by measuring the continuous reduction of 5,5’-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB) to 5-thio-2-nitrobenzoic acid (TNB) by spectrophotometry (Synergy MX) at 412 nm. Measures were taken at 1 min intervals for 5 minutes. The production rate of TNB is proportional to the concentration of glutathione up to 2 µM and values for GSH concentration were calculated as the difference between TNB absorbance values measured at time 0 versus 5 min with reduced glutathione as standard.

Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) is usually determined spectroscopically at 340 nm using a coupled assay with glutathione reductase (GR). Another methodologies can be found in Flohé, L., Günzler, W.A. (1984). The reaction mixture usually contains (in mmol/L or mM) 50 phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 10-100 µl sample, 0.24-1.0 U of glutathione reductase (usually from yeast), 1-4  GSH, 0.6-4.3  EDTA and 0.15-0.34  NADPH . The reaction is started by adding 10-100 µl peroxide (hydrogen peroxide, cumene hydroperoxide or tert-butylperoxide) to a final concentration of 0.1-2.0 mM . For quantification in crude extracts, the addition of azide is required to inhibit the catalase reaction, when H2O2 is used as substrate. The decrease in absorbance is followed at 340 nm from 1 to 10 min. The blank is made by substituting the sample by the same buffer in which the sample is prepared.

Thioredoxin Reductase (TrxR). TrxR activity is normally measured by the method of Holmgren and Bjornstedt (1995). The reaction mixture consisted of the following (in mM): 0.24 NADPH, 10 EDTA, 100 potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 5 5,5’-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB), and 0.2mg/mL of BSA. The partially purified TrxR was added (to final concentration of 6–10 microg/ml of protein) to the cuvette containing the reaction mixture, and the absorbance is followed at 412 nm for 4 min.

Type 2 5’-deiodinase (DIO 2). Deiodinase is usually determined by measuring [125]I released from [125I]reverse T3 (rT3) in in a gamma counter after separation of [125]I by ion exchange chromatography (Dowex 50W-X2 resin) as described by Mori et al., 1996. The reaction medium contains (in mM):  100 potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 1 EDTA, 20 dithiothreitol (DTT), 1 6-proryl-2-thiouracil (PTU), and 2 nM rT3.

Glutamine synthetase (GS). GS can be measured by different methods: a) the of formation of inorganic phosphate (Pi), b) ADP at 340 nm (using the enzymes pyruvate kinase and lactate dehydrogenase as coupled reactions), c) glutamine (e.g., determining the transformation of 14C-glutamate to 14C-glutamine) or d) the colorimetric formation of glutamylhydroxamate assay method. The glutamylhydroxamate assay method usually is determined in the presence of (in mM) 0.1 ml of enzyme solution (0.1 ml) plus 0.9 ml of the reaction solution with 50 imidazole-HCl buffer, 20 MgCI2, 25 mercaptoethanol, 50 sodium L-glutamate, 100 hydroxylamine, and 10 ATP. After incubation, 1.5 ml of FeCl3 (370 mM FeCl3, 670 mM HCl, and 200 mM trichloroacetic acid) is added. The mixture is centrifuged and the supernatant is used to determine the absorbance at 535 nm (Patel et al., 1982; Pishak and Phillips, 1979).

Ca2+-ATPase. Ca2+-ATPase can be determined directly by the quantification of inorganic phosphate released from ATP or indirectly by determining the 45Ca2+ uptake by brain microsomes (Freitas et al. 1996).  The assay mixture for Ca2+ uptake determination has (in mM) 50 MOPS-Tris (pH 7.4), 5 MgCl2, , 1 ATP, 20 Pi (inorganic phosphate) and 0.04 CaCl2 (0.5 µCi/ml 45CaCl2).  The microsome is then filtrated through Millipore filters (0.45 µm) and flushed with La(NO3) 3 and the radioactivity in the filters is counted on a scintillation counter.

Complex I. Complex I activity was measured by the rate of NADH-dependent ferricyanide reduction as described in (Cassina and Radi,1996). In short, the NADH dehydrogenase can be determined in by the reduction of ferricyanide  at 420 nm in the presence of (in mM) 0.2 NADH and 0.5 ferrycianide. The activity is determine in the presence of 5 µM rotenone.

Complex II and Complex II-III. The complex II activity or succinate -2,6-dichloroindophenol (DCIPI) reductase activity  and the complex III (succinate: cytochrome c oxidoreductase or complex II-CoQ-complex III activity) can be determined by the method of Fischer in the presence of (in mM): 50 potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 20 succinate, 2 KCN and 0.05 DCIPI at 600 nm or 0.05 of oxidized cytochrome c at  550 nm.

Complex IV. Cytochrome c oxidase (complex IV) activity can be determined spectrophotometrically by the method of Rustin et al. 1994 at 550 nm.


References

Arnold, A.P., Tan, K.-S., Rabenstein, D.L. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of the Solution Chemistry of Metal Complexes. 23. Complexation of Methylmercury by Selenohydryl-Containing Amino Acids and Related Molecules (1986) Inorganic Chemistry, 25 (14), pp. 2433-2437.

Bapu, C., Sood, P.P., Nivsarkar, M. Organelle specific enzyme markers as indicators of methylmercury neurotoxicity and antidotal efficacy in mice (2003) BioMetals, 16 (2), pp. 279-284.

Barbosa, N.V., Nogueira, C.W., Nogara, P.A., De Bem, A.F., Aschner, M., Rocha, J.B.T. Organoselenium compounds as mimics of selenoproteins and thiol modifier agents (2017) Metallomics, 9 (12), pp. 1703-1734.

Belletti S, Orlandini G, Vettori MV, Mutti A, Uggeri J, Scandroglio R, Alinovi R, Gatti R. Time course assessment of methylmercury effects on C6 glioma cells: submicromolar concentrations induce oxidative DNA damage and apoptosis. Journal of neuroscience research. 2002 Dec 1;70(5):703-11.

Bent GA, Fairman RA, Grierson L. Towards a Deeper Understanding of the Mechanisms of Interaction between Acrylamide and Key Body-Fluid Thiols. J Clin Toxicol. 2016;6(304):2161-0495.

Bergmark E, Calleman CJ, Costa LG. Formation of hemoglobin adducts of acrylamide and its epoxide metabolite glycidamide in the rat. Toxicology and applied pharmacology. 1991; 111(2):352-63.

Cambier S, Benard G, Mesmer-Dudons N, Gonzalez P, Rossignol R, Brethes D, Bourdineaud JP. At environmental doses, dietary methylmercury inhibits mitochondrial energy metabolism in skeletal muscles of the zebra fish (Danio rerio). The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology. 2009 Apr 30;41(4):791-9.

Carvalho, C.M.L., Lu, J., Zhang, X., Arnér, E.S.J., Holmgren, A. Effects of selenite and chelating agents on mammalian thioredoxin reductase inhibited by mercury: Implications for treatment of mercury poisoning (2011) FASEB Journal, 25 (1), pp. 370-381.

Cassina A, Radi R. Differential inhibitory action of nitric oxide and peroxynitrite on mitochondrial electron transport. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics. 1996 Apr 15;328(2):309-16.

Ceccatelli, S., Daré, E., Moors, M.Methylmercury-induced neurotoxicity and apoptosis (2010) Chemico-Biological Interactions, 188 (2), pp. 301-308.

Cheng JP, Yang YC, Hu WX, Yang L, Wang WH, Jia JP, Lin XY(2005) Effect of methylmercury on some neurotransmitters and oxidative damage of rats. J Environ  Sci (China) 17:469-473.

Comini MA. Measurement and meaning of cellular thiol: disufhide redox status. Free radical research. 2016 Feb 1;50(2):246-71.

Eriksson, S., Svenson, A. Catalytic effects by thioltransferase on the transfer of methylmercury and p-mercuribenzoate from macromolecules to low molecular weight thiol compounds (1978) Toxicology, 10 (C), pp. 115-122.

Dreiem A, Gertz CC, Seegal RF. The effects of methylmercury on mitochondrial function and reactive oxygen species formation in rat striatal synaptosomes are age-dependent. Toxicol Sci. 2005 Sep;87(1):156-62.

Dreiem A, Seegal RF. Methylmercury-induced changes in mitochondrial function in striatal synaptosomes are calcium-dependent and ROS-independent. Neurotoxicology. 2007 Jul;28(4):720-6.

Fischer JC, Ruitenbeek W, Berden JA, Trijbels JF, Veerkamp JH, Stadhouders AM, Sengers RC, Janssen AJ. Differential investigation of the capacity of succinate oxidation in human skeletal muscle. Clinica chimica acta. 1985 Nov 29;153(1):23-36.

Flohé, L., Günzler, W.A. (1984)   Assays of Glutathione Peroxidase (1984) Methods in Enzymology, 105 (C), pp. 114-120.

Fonnum, F., Lock, E.A. The contributions of excitotoxicity, glutathione depletion and DNA repair in chemically induced injury to neurones: Exemplified with toxic effects on cerebellar granule cells (2004) Journal of Neurochemistry, 88 (3), pp. 513-531.

Fonfría, E., Vilaró, M.T., Babot, Z., Rodríguez-Farré, E., Suñol, C. Mercury compounds disrupt neuronal glutamate transport in cultured mouse cerebellar granule cells (2005) Journal of Neuroscience Research, 79 (4), pp. 545-553.

Franco, J.L., Posser, T., Dunkley, P.R., Dickson, P.W., Mattos, J.J., Martins, R., Bainy, A.C.D., Marques, M.R., Dafre, A.L., Farina, M. Methylmercury neurotoxicity is associated with inhibition of the antioxidant enzyme glutathione peroxidase (2009) Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 47 (4), pp. 449-457.

Freitas, A. J., Rocha, J. B. T., Wolosker, H., & Souza, D. O. G. (1996). Effects of Hg2+ and CH3Hg+ on Ca2+ fluxes in rat brain microsomes. Brain research, 738(2), 257-264.

Friedman M. Chemistry, biochemistry, and safety of acrylamide. A review. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 2003 Jul 30;51(16):4504-26.

George, G.N., Singh, S.P., Prince, R.C., Pickering, I.J. Chemical forms of mercury and selenium in fish following digestion with simulated gastric fluid (2008) Chemical Research in Toxicology, 21 (11), pp. 2106-2110.

Glaser, V., Nazari, E.M., Müller, Y.M.R., Feksa, L., Wannmacher, C.M.D., Rocha, J.B.T., Bem, A.F.D., Farina, M., Latini, A. Effects of inorganic selenium administration in methylmercury-induced neurotoxicity in mouse cerebral cortex (2010a) International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 28 (7), pp. 631-637.

Glaser, V., Leipnitz, G., Straliotto, M.R., Oliveira, J., dos Santos, V.V., Wannmacher, C.M.D., de Bem, A.F., Rocha, J.B.T., Farina, M., Latini, A. Oxidative stress-mediated inhibition of brain creatine kinase activity by methylmercury  (2010b) NeuroToxicology, 31 (5), pp. 454-460.

Holmgren and Bjornstedt (1995) Thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase. Methods Enzymol. 252: 199-208.

Hoppe, B., Bräuer, A.U., Kühbacher, M., Savaskan, N.E., Behne, D., Kyriakopoulos, A. Biochemical analysis of selenoprotein expression in brain cell lines and in distinct brain regions (2008) Cell and Tissue Research, 332 (3), pp. 403-414.

Howland RD, Vyas IL, Lowndes HE, Argentieri TM. The etiology of toxic peripheral neuropathies: in vitro effects of acrylamide and 2, 5-hexanedione on brain enolase and other glycolytic enzymes. Brain Research. 1980 Nov 24;202(1):131-42.

Hughes, B.P. (1962) A method for the estimation of serum creatine kinase and its use in comparing creatine kinase and aldolase activity in normal and pathological sera. Clinica Chimica Acta, 7, 597-603.

Isab, A.A. Estimated formation constants for the complexation of methylmercury(II) by captopril {1-[(2S)-3-mercapto-2-methyl-1-oxopropyl]-L-proline}: Evidence of stronger binding to the cis isomer of the drug (1991) Journal of the Chemical Society, Dalton Transactions, (3), pp. 449-452.

Johansson, C., Castoldi, A.F., Onishchenko, N., Manzo, L., Vahter, M., Ceccatelli, S. Neurobehavioural and molecular changes induced by methylmercury exposure during development (2007) Neurotoxicity Research, 11 (3-4), pp. 241-260.

Kopańska M, Lukáč N, Kapusta E, Formicki G. Acrylamide influence on activity of acetylcholinesterase, thiol groups, and malondialdehyde content in the brain of Swiss mice. Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology. 2015 Oct 1;29(10):472-8.

Kwon, O.-S., Park, Y.-J. In vitro and in vivo dose-dependent inhibition of methylmercury on glutamine synthetase in the brain of different species (2003) Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 14 (1-2), pp. 17-24.

Lapadula DM, Bowe M, Carrington CD, Dulak L, Friedman M, Abou-Donia MB. In vitro binding of [14C] acrylamide to neurofilament and microtubule proteins of rats. Brain research. 1989 Feb 27;481(1):157-61.

Li, Y., Shi, W., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Hu, X., Song, C., Ma, H., Wang, C., Li, Y. Neuroprotective effects of chlorogenic acid against apoptosis of PC12 cells induced by methylmercury (2008) Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 26 (1), pp. 13-21.

Limke TL, Atchison WD. Acute exposure to methylmercury opens the mitochondrial permeability transition pore in rat cerebellar granule cells. Toxicology and applied pharmacology. 2002 Jan 1;178(1):52-61.

Liu, W., Xu, Z., Deng, Y., Xu, B., Wei, Y., Yang, T.  Protective effects of memantine against methylmercury-induced glutamate dyshomeostasis and oxidative stress in rat cerebral cortex (2013) Neurotoxicity Research, 24 (3), pp. 320-337.

LoPachin RM. The changing view of acrylamide neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicology. 2004 Jun 1;25(4):617-30.

LoPachin RM, Gavin T. Molecular mechanisms of aldehyde toxicity: a chemical perspective. Chemical research in toxicology. 2014 Jun 17;27(7):1081-91.

LoPachin RM, Schwarcz AI, Gaughan CL, Mansukhani S, Das S. In vivo and in vitro effects of acrylamide on synaptosomal neurotransmitter uptake and release. Neurotoxicology. 2004 Mar 1;25(3):349-63.

LoPachin RM, Gavin T, Geohagen BC, Das S. Neurotoxic mechanisms of electrophilic type-2 alkenes: soft–soft interactions described by quantum mechanical parameters. Toxicological sciences. 2007 May 22;98(2):561-70.

LoPachin RM, Gavin T, Petersen DR, Barber DS. Molecular mechanisms of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal and acrolein toxicity: nucleophilic targets and adduct formation. Chemical research in toxicology. 2009 Jul 17;22(9):1499-508.

LoPachin RM, Gavin T, DeCaprio A, Barber DS. Application of the hard and soft, acids and bases (HSAB) theory to toxicant–target interactions. Chemical research in toxicology. 2011 Nov 16;25(2):239-51.

Malagutti, K.S., da Silva, A.P., Braga, H.C., Mitozo, P.A., Soares dos Santos, A.R., Dafre, A.L., de Bem, A.F., Farina, M. 17β-estradiol decreases methylmercury-induced neurotoxicity in male mice (2009) Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 27 (2), pp. 293-297.

Martyniuk CJ, Fang B, Koomen JM, Gavin T, Zhang L, Barber DS, LoPachin RM. Molecular mechanism of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase inactivation by α, β-unsaturated carbonyl derivatives. Chemical research in toxicology. 2011 Nov 29;24(12):2302-11.

Montgomery, K.S., Mackey, J., Thuett, K., Ginestra, S., Bizon, J.L., Abbott, L.C. Chronic, low-dose prenatal exposure to methylmercury impairs motor and mnemonic function in adult C57/B6 mice (2008) Behavioural Brain Research, 191 (1), pp. 55-61.

Mori KO, Stone SC, Braverman LE, Devito WJ. Involvement of tyrosine phosphorylation in the regulation of 5'-deiodinases in FRTL-5 rat thyroid cells and rat astrocytes. Endocrinology. 1996 Apr 1;137(4):1313-8.

Mori, K., Yoshida, K., Nakagawa, Y., Hoshikawa, S., Ozaki, H., Ito, S., Watanabe, C. Methylmercury inhibition of type II 5′-deiodinase activity resulting in a decrease in growth hormone production in GH3 cells (2007) Toxicology, 237 (1-3), pp. 203-209.

Mori, K., Yoshida, K., Tani, J.-I., Hoshikawa, S., Ito, S., Watanabe, C. Methylmercury inhibits type II 5′-deiodinase activity in NB41A3 neuroblastoma cells (2006) Toxicology Letters, 161 (2), pp. 96-101.

Mori N, Yasutake A, Hirayama K. Comparative study of activities in reactive oxygen species production/defense system in mitochondria of rat brain and liver, and their susceptibility to methylmercury toxicity. Archives of toxicology. 2007 Nov 1;81(11):769-76.

Mori, N., Yasutake, A., Marumoto, M. and Hirayama, K., 2011. Methylmercury inhibits electron transport chain activity and induces cytochrome c release in cerebellum mitochondria. The Journal of toxicological sciences, 36(3), pp.253-259.

Ni, M., Li, X., Yin, Z., Sidoryk-Weogonekgrzynowicz, M., Jiang, H., Farina, M., Rocha, J.B.T., Syversen, T., Aschner, M. Comparative study on the response of rat primary astrocytes and microglia to methylmercury toxicity (2011) GLIA, 59 (5), pp. 810-820.

Ni, M., Li, X., Yin, Z., Jiang, H., Sidoryk-Wegrzynowicz, M., Milatovic, D., Cai, J., Aschner, M. Methylmercury induces acute oxidative stress, altering Nrf2 protein level in primary microglial cells (2010) Toxicological Sciences, 116 (2), pp. 590-603.

O'Kusky, J., 1983. Methylmercury poisoning of the developing nervous system: morphological changes in neuronal mitochondria. Acta neuropathologica, 61(2), pp.116-122.

Patel AJ, Hunt A, Gordon RD, Balazs R: The activities in different neural cell types of certain enzymes associated with the metabolic compartmentation glutamate. Brain research 1982, 256:3-11.

Pishak MR, Phillips AT: A modified radioisotopic assay for measuring glutamine synthetase activity in tissue extracts. Analytical biochemistry 1979, 94:82-88.

Polunas, M., Halladay, A., Tjalkens, R.B., Philbert, M.A., Lowndes, H. and Reuhl, K., 2011. Role of oxidative stress and the mitochondrial permeability transition in methylmercury cytotoxicity. Neurotoxicology, 32(5), pp.526-534.

Rabenstein, D.L. The Aqueous Solution Chemistry of Methylmercury and Its Complexes (1978b) Accounts of Chemical Research, 11 (3), pp. 100-107.

Rabenstein, D.L., Arnold, A.P., Guy, R.D. 1H-NMR study of the removal of methylmercury from intact erythrocytes by sulfhydryl compounds (1986) Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 28 (2-3), pp. 279-287.

Rabenstein, D.L., Bravo, J. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of the Solution Chemistry of Metal Complexes: 24: Arylmercury(II) Complexes of Sulfhydryl-Containing Ligands (1987) Inorganic Chemistry, 26 (17), pp. 2784-2787.

Rabenstein, D.L., Evans, C.A. The mobility of methylmercury in biological systems (1978) Bioinorganic Chemistry, 8 (2), pp. 107-114.

Rabenstein, D.L., Fairhurst, M.T. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of the Solution Chemistry of Metal Complexes. XI. Binding of Methylmercury by Sulfhydryl-Containing Amino Acids and by Glutathione (1975) Journal of the American Chemical Society, 97 (8), pp. 2086-2092.

Rabenstein, D.L., Reid, R.S. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of the Solution Chemistry of Metal Complexes. 20. Ligand-Exchange Kinetics of Methylmercury(II)-Thiol Complexes (1984) Inorganic Chemistry, 23 (9), pp. 1246-1250.

Rabenstein, D.L., Reid, R.S., Isab, A.A. 1H nmr study of the effectiveness of various thiols for removal of methylmercury from hemolyzed erythrocytes (1983) Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 18 (3), pp. 241-251.

Reid, R.S., Rabenstein, D.L. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of the Solution Chemistry of Metal Complexes. 19. Formation Constants for the Complexation of Methylmercury by Glutathione, Ergothioneine, and Hemoglobin (1982) Journal of the American Chemical Society, 104 (24), pp. 6733-6737.

Roos, D., Seeger, R., Puntel, R., Vargas Barbosa, N. Role of calcium and mitochondria in MeHg-mediated cytotoxicity (2012) Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, 2012, art. no. 248764,

Rowe, W..B., Ronzio, R.A., Wellner, V.P., Meister, A. (1970) Glutamine synthetase (sheep brain).Meth ods in Enzymology,17, Part A, 900-910.

Rustin, P., Chretien, D., Bourgeron, T., Gerard, B., Rötig, A., Saudubray, J. M., & Munnich, A. (1994). Biochemical and molecular investigations in respiratory chain deficiencies. Clinica chimica acta, 228(1), 35-51.

Shenker BJ, Guo TL, Shapiro IM. Low-level methylmercury exposure causes human T-cells to undergo apoptosis: evidence of mitochondrial dysfunction. Environmental research. 1998 May 31;77(2):149-59.   

Shenker BJ, Guo TL, Insug O, Shapiro IM. Induction of apoptosis in human T-cells by methyl mercury: temporal relationship between mitochondrial dysfunction and loss of reductive reserve. Toxicology and applied pharmacology. 1999 May 15;157(1):23-35.

Sorg, O., Schilter, B., Honegger, P., Monnet-Tschudi, F.Increased vulnerability of neurones and glial cells to low concentrations of methylmercury in a prooxidant situation (1998) Acta Neuropathologica, 96 (6), pp. 621-627.

Stringari, J., Nunes, A.K.C., Franco, J.L., Bohrer, D., Garcia, S.C., Dafre, A.L., Milatovic, D., Souza, D.O., Rocha, J.B.T., Aschner, M., Farina, M. Prenatal methylmercury exposure hampers glutathione antioxidant system ontogenesis and causes long-lasting oxidative stress in the mouse brain (2008) Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 227 (1), pp. 147-154.

Tong GC, Cornwell WK, Means GE. Reactions of acrylamide with glutathione and serum albumin. Toxicology letters. 2004 Mar 1;147(2):127-31.

Wagner, C., Sudati, J.H., Nogueira, C.W., Rocha, J.B.T. In vivo and in vitro inhibition of mice thioredoxin reductase by methylmercury (2010) BioMetals, 23 (6), pp. 1171-1177.

Wormser, U., Brodsky, B., Milatovic, D., Finkelstein, Y., Farina, M., Rocha, J.B., Aschner, M. Protective effect of a novel peptide against methylmercury-induced toxicity in rat primary astrocytes (2012) NeuroToxicology, 33 (4), pp. 763-768.

Yin, Z., Milatovic, D., Aschner, J.L., Syversen, T., Rocha, J.B.T., Souza, D.O., Sidoryk, M., Albrecht, J., Aschner, M.   Methylmercury induces oxidative injury, alterations in permeability and glutamine transport in cultured astrocytes (2007) Brain Research, 1131 (1), pp. 1-10.

Yousef MI, El-Demerdash FM. Acrylamide-induced oxidative stress and biochemical perturbations in rats. Toxicology. 2006 Feb 15;219(1-3):133-41.

Zemolin, A.P.P., Meinerz, D.F., de Paula, M.T., Mariano, D.O.C., Rocha, J.B.T., Pereira, A.B., Posser, T., Franco, J.L.  Evidences for a role of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPx4) in Methylmercury induced neurotoxicity in vivo (2012) Toxicology, 302 (1), pp. 60-67.

Zhu, S.-Y., Li, X.-N., Sun, X.-C., Lin, J., Li, W., Zhang, C., Li, J.-L. Biochemical characterization of the selenoproteome in Gallus gallus via bioinformatics analysis: structure-function relationships and interactions of binding molecules (2017) Metallomics, 9 (2), pp. 124-131.


List of Key Events in the AOP

Event: 1392: Oxidative Stress

Short Name: Oxidative Stress

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Molecular

Domain of Applicability


Oxidative stress is produced in, and can occur in, any species from bacteria through to humans.


Key Event Description

Oxidative stress is defined as an imbalance in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidant defenses. High levels of oxidizing free radicals can be very damaging to cells and molecules within the cell.  As a result, the cell has important defense mechanisms to protect itself from ROS. For example, Nrf2 is a transcription factor and master regulator of the oxidative stress response. During periods of oxidative stress, Nrf2-dependent changes in gene expression are important in regaining cellular homeostasis (Nguyen, et al. 2009) and can be used as indicators of the presence of oxidative stress in the cell.

In addition to the directly damaging actions of ROS, cellular oxidative stress also changes cellular activities on a molecular level. Redox sensitive proteins have altered physiology in the presence and absence of ROS, which is caused by the oxidation of sulfhydryls to disulfides (2SH àSS) on neighboring amino acids (Antelmann and Helmann 2011). Importantly Keap1, the negative regulator of Nrf2, is regulated in this manner (Itoh, et al. 2010).


How it is Measured or Detected

Oxidative Stress. Direct measurement of ROS is difficult because ROS are unstable. The presence of ROS can be assayed indirectly by measurement of cellular antioxidants, or by ROS-dependent cellular damage:
-    Glutathione (GSH) depletion. GSH can be measured by assaying the ratio of reduced to oxidized glutathione (GSH:GSSG) using a commercially available kit (e.g., http://www.abcam.com/gshgssg-ratio-detection-assay-kit-fluorometric-green-ab138881.html). 
-    TBARS. Oxidative damage to lipids can be measured by assaying for lipid peroxidation using TBARS (thiobarbituric acid reactive substances) using a commercially available kit. 
-    8-oxo-dG. Oxidative damage to nucleic acids can be assayed by measuring 8-oxo-dG adducts (for which there are a number of ELISA based commercially available kits),or  HPLC, described in Chepelev et al. (Chepelev, et al. 2015).

Molecular Biology: Nrf2. Nrf2’s transcriptional activity is controlled post-translationally by oxidation of Keap1. Assay for Nrf2 activity include:
-    Immunohistochemistry for increases in Nrf2 protein levels and translocation into the nucleus; 
-    Western blot for increased Nrf2 protein levels; 
-    Western blot of cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions to observe translocation of Nrf2 protein from the cytoplasm to the nucleus; 
-    qPCR of Nrf2 target genes (e.g., Nqo1, Hmox-1, Gcl, Gst, Prx, TrxR, Srxn), or by commercially available pathway-based qPCR array (e.g., oxidative stress array from SABiosciences)
-    Whole transcriptome profiling by microarray or RNA-seq followed by pathway analysis (in IPA, DAVID, metacore, etc.) for enrichment of the Nrf2 oxidative stress response pathway (e.g., Jackson et al. 2014).

 


References

Antelmann, H., Helmann, J.D., 2011. Thiol-based redox switches and gene regulation. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 14, 1049-1063.

Chepelev, N.L., Kennedy, D.A., Gagne, R., White, T., Long, A.S., Yauk, C.L., White, P.A., 2015. HPLC Measurement of the DNA Oxidation Biomarker, 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine, in Cultured Cells and Animal Tissues. J. Vis. Exp. (102):e52697. doi, e52697.

Itoh, K., Mimura, J., Yamamoto, M., 2010. Discovery of the negative regulator of Nrf2, Keap1: a historical overview. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 13, 1665-1678.

Nguyen, T., Nioi, P., Pickett, C.B., 2009. The Nrf2-antioxidant response element signaling pathway and its activation by oxidative stress. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 13291-13295.

 


Event: 1488: Glutamate dyshomeostasis

Short Name: Glutamate dyshomeostasis

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Cellular

Cell term

Cell term
neural cell

Organ term

Organ term
brain

Key Event Description

Glutamate (Glu) is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system (CNS), where it plays major roles in multiple aspects, such as development, learning, memory and response to injury (Featherstone, 2010). However, it is well recognized that Glu at high concentrations at the synaptic cleft acts as a toxin, inducing neuronal injury and death (Meldrum, 2000; Ozawa et al., 1998) secondary to activation of glumatergic N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors and Ca2+ influx. Glu dyshomeostasis is a consequence of perturbation of  astrocyte/neuron interactions and the transport of this amino acid, as will be discussed below.

Astrocytes are critically involved in neuronal function and survival, as they produce neurotrophic factors, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and glia-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), as well as express two main glutamate transporters responsible for the removal of excessive Glu from the synaptic clefts (Chai et al., 2013; Sheldon et al., 2007). Glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the CNS, playing a major role in memory and cognitive function (Platt, 1997), and Glu transporters as such prevent the overstimulation of post-synaptic glutamate receptors that lead to excitotoxic neuronal injury (Sattler et al., 2001; Dobble, 1999). Among the five subtypes of Glu transporters identified, glutamate aspartate transporter (GLAST) and Glu transporter-1 (GLT-1) [excitatory amino acid transporter (EAAT) 1 and 2 in humans, respectively], are predominantly expressed in astrocytes. They are responsible for the uptake of excess glutamate from the extracellular space (Furuta et al., 1997; Lehre et al., 1995; Tanaka, 2000), supported by the fact that knockdown of either GLT-1 or GLAST in mice increases extracellular glutamate levels, leading to excitotoxicity related neurodegeneration and progressive paralysis (Bristol and Rothstein, 1996). In the adult brain, EAAT2 accounts for >90% of extracellular glutamate clearance (Danbolt, 2001; Kim et al., 2011; Rothstein et al., 1995), and genetic deletion of both alleles of GLT-1 in mice leads to the development of lethal seizures (Rothstein et al., 1996). On the other hand, EAAT1-3 play a major role during human brain development, in particular in corticogenesis, where they are expressed in proliferative zones and in radial glia, and alterations of Glu transporters contributes to disorganized cortex seen in migration disorders (Furuta et al., 2005;Regan et al., 2007). Indeed, disruption of glutamate signaling is thought to be part of the etiology underlying some neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism and schizophrenia (Chiocchetti et al., 2014; Schwartz et al., 2012). Genetic variants associated with autism spectrum disorders were enriched in glutamatergic pathways, affecting receptor signalling, metabolism and transport (Chiocchetti et al, 2014).

Extracellular Glu released by neurons is taken up by astrocytes, which is converted into glutamine (Gln) by glutamine synthetase (GS), a thiol-containing enzyme (cf MIE, Binding to SH-/seleno containing proteins). Intercellular compartmentation of Gln and Glu, the so-called Gln/Glu-GABA cycle (GGC), is critical for optimal CNS function.13C NMR studies have demonstrated that the ratio of Gln/Glu is extremely high and increases with brain activity (Shen et al., 1999). Thus the GGC gives rise to the amino acid neurotransmitters Glu and GABA via dynamic astrocyte neuron interactions. Glu released at synaptic terminals is taken up by surrounding astrocytes via GLT-1 and GLAST (Rothstein et al., 1994; 1996). A small proportion of the astrocytic formed Gln via a reaction mediated by GS is transported into the extracellular space by Gln carriers, with a predominant role for System N/A transporter (SNAT3), which belongs to the bidirectional transporter System N (Chaudhry et al., 2002).

In addition to System N, release of Gln from astrocytes is mediated by other transport systems, including Systems L (LAT2) and ASC (ASCT2). Extracellular Gln is taken up into GABAergic and Glu-ergic neurons by the unidirectional System A transporters SNAT1 (Melone et al., 2004) and SNAT2 (Grewal et al., 2009). Once in neurons, Gln is converted to Glu by the mitochondrial enzyme phosphate-activated glutaminase (Kvamme et al., 2001). Additionally, Glu is packaged into synaptic vesicles by the vesicular VGLUT transporter (Bellocchio et al., 1998), released into the extracellular space and taken up by astrocytes where it is converted back to Gln by GS, thus completing the GGC (Fig. 1).

Figure 1: Schematic representation of Glu and Gln transport systems related to the GGC. From Sidorik-Wegrzynowicz and Aschner, 2013)


How it is Measured or Detected

  • The glutamate uptake activity via EAAT1 can be determined in the presence of dihydrokainic acid (DHK), a specific inhibitor for GLT-1, as described in Mutkus et al. (2005).
  • For measuring glutamate release, load 3H glutamate for several hours and then look at release over time, as descibed in (Arizza et al., 1994)
  • Glutamate Assay Kit from Abcam (ab83389) provides a sensitive detection method of the glutamate in a variety of samples. This kit will only measure free glutamate levels but not glutamic acid found in the backbone of peptides or proteins. The glutamate Enzyme Mix recognizes glutamate as a specific substrate leading to proportional color development.The amount of glutamate can therefore be easily quantified by colorimetric spectrophotometry at OD = 450 nm.

References

Arriza JL, Fairman WA, Wadiche JI, Murdoch GH, Kavanaugh MP, Amara SG (1994) Functional comparisons of three glutamate transporter subtypes cloned from human motor cortex. J Neurosci 14(9):5559–5569.

Bellocchio EE, Hu H, Pohorille A, Chan J, Pickel VM, Edwards RH. The localization of the brain-specific inorganic phosphate transporter suggests a specific presynaptic role in glutamatergic transmission. J Neurosci. 1998;18:8648–59.

Bristol LA, Rothstein JD. Glutamate transporter gene expression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis motor cortex. Annals of neurology. 1996;39:676–679.

Chai L, Guo H, Li H, Wang S, Wang YL, Shi F, Hu LM, Liu Y, Adah D. Scutellarin and caffeic acid ester fraction, active components of Dengzhanxixin injection, upregulate neurotrophins synthesis and release in hypoxia/reoxygenation rat astrocytes. Journal of ethnopharmacology. 2013;150:100–107.

Chaudhry FA, Reimer RJ, Edwards RH. The glutamine commute: take the N line and transfer to the A. J Cell Biol. 2002;157:349–55.

Chiocchetti, A. G., H. S. Bour and C. M. Freitag (2014). "Glutamatergic candidate genes in autism spectrum disorder: an overview." J Neural Transm (Vienna) 121(9): 1081-1106.

Danbolt NC. Glutamate uptake. Progress in neurobiology. 2001;65:1–105.

Doble A. The role of excitotoxicity in neurodegenerative disease: implications for therapy. Pharmacology & therapeutics. 1999;81:163–221.

Featherstone, D. E. (2010). "Intercellular glutamate signaling in the nervous system and beyond." ACS Chem Neurosci 1(1): 4-12.

Furuta A, Rothstein JD, Martin LJ. Glutamate transporter protein subtypes are expressed differentially during rat CNS development. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 1997;17:8363–8375.

Furuta, A., S. Takashima, H. Yokoo, J. D. Rothstein, K. Wada and T. Iwaki (2005). "Expression of glutamate transporter subtypes during normal human corticogenesis and type II lissencephaly." Brain Res Dev Brain Res 155(2): 155-164.

Grewal S, Defamie N, Zhang X, et al. SNAT2 amino acid transporter is regulated by amino acids of the SLC6 gamma-aminobutyric acid transporter subfamily in neocortical neurons and may play no role in delivering glutamine for glutamatergic transmission. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:11224–36.

Kim K, Lee SG, Kegelman TP, Su ZZ, Das SK, Dash R, Dasgupta S, Barral PM, Hedvat M, Diaz P, Reed JC, Stebbins JL, Pellecchia M, Sarkar D, Fisher PB. Role of excitatory amino acid transporter-2 (EAAT2) and glutamate in neurodegeneration: opportunities for developing novel therapeutics. Journal of cellular physiology. 2011;226:2484–2493.

Kvamme E, Torgner IA, Roberg B. Kinetics and localization of brain phosphate activated glutaminase. J Neurosci Res. 2001;66:951–8.

Lehre KP, Levy LM, Ottersen OP, Storm-Mathisen J, Danbolt NC. Differential expression of two glial glutamate transporters in the rat brain: quantitative and immunocytochemical observations. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 1995;15:1835–1853.

Meldrum, B. S. (2000). "Glutamate as a neurotransmitter in the brain: review of physiology and pathology." J Nutr 130(4S Suppl): 1007S-1015S.

Melone M, Quagliano F, Barbaresi P, Varoqui H, Erickson JD, Conti F. Localization of the glutamine transporter SNAT1 in rat cerebral cortex and neighboring structures, with a note on its localization in human cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14:562–74.

Mutkus, L., J. L. Aschner, T. Syversen and M. Aschner (2005). "Methylmercury alters the in vitro uptake of glutamate in GLAST- and GLT-1-transfected mutant CHO-K1 cells." Biol Trace Elem Res 107(3): 231-245.

Ozawa, S., H. Kamiya and K. Tsuzuki (1998). "Glutamate receptors in the mammalian central nervous system." Prog Neurobiol 54(5): 581-618.

Platt SR. The role of glutamate in central nervous system health and disease--a review. Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997) 2007;173:278–286.

Regan MR, Huang YH, Kim YS, Dykes-Hoberg MI, Jin L, Watkins AM, Bergles DE, Rothstein JD. Variations in promoter activity reveal a differential expression and physiology of glutamate transporters by glia in the developing and mature CNS. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2007;27:6607–6619.

Rothstein JD, Martin L, Levey AI, et al. Localization of neuronal and glial glutamate transporters. Neuron. 1994;13:713–25.

Rothstein JD, Van Kammen M, Levey AI, Martin LJ, Kuncl RW. Selective loss of glial glutamate transporter GLT-1 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Annals of neurology. 1995;38:73–84.

Rothstein JD, Dykes-Hoberg M, Pardo CA, Bristol LA, Jin L, Kuncl RW, Kanai Y, Hediger MA, Wang Y, Schielke JP, Welty DF. Knockout of glutamate transporters reveals a major role for astroglial transport in excitotoxicity and clearance of glutamate. Neuron. 1996;16:675–686.

Sattler R, Tymianski M. Molecular mechanisms of glutamate receptor-mediated excitotoxic neuronal cell death. Molecular neurobiology. 2001;24:107–129.

Schwartz, C. E. and G. Neri (2012). "Autism and intellectual disability: two sides of the same coin." Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 160C(2): 89-90.

Sheldon AL, Robinson MB. The role of glutamate transporters in neurodegenerative diseases and potential opportunities for intervention. Neurochemistry international. 2007;51:333–355.

Shen J, Petersen KF, Behar KL, et al. Determination of the rate of the glutamate/glutamine cycle in the human brain by in vivo 13C NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:8235–40.

Sidoryk-Wegrzynowicz M1Aschner M. Manganese toxicity in the central nervous system: the glutamine/glutamate-γ-aminobutyric acid cycle. J Intern Med. 2013 May;273(5):466-77. doi: 10.1111/joim.12040.

Tanaka K. Functions of glutamate transporters in the brain. Neuroscience research. 2000;37:15–19.

 


Event: 55: N/A, Cell injury/death

Short Name: N/A, Cell injury/death

Key Event Component

Process Object Action
cell death increased

AOPs Including This Key Event


Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Cellular

Cell term

Cell term
eukaryotic cell

Domain of Applicability


Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
human Homo sapiens High NCBI
human and other cells in culture human and other cells in culture High NCBI
Rattus norvegicus Rattus norvegicus High NCBI
mouse Mus musculus High NCBI

Cell death is an universal event occurring in cells of any species. [11]


Key Event Description

Two types of cell death can be distinguished by morphological features, although it is likely that these are two ends of a spectrum with possible intermediate forms. Apoptosis involves shrinkage, nuclear disassembly, and fragmentation of the cell into discrete bodies with intact plasma membranes. These are rapidly phagocytosed by neighbouring cells. An important feature of apoptosis is the requirement for adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to initiate the execution phase. In contrast, necrotic cell death is characterized by cell swelling and lysis. This is usually a consequence of profound loss of mitochondrial function and resultant ATP depletion, leading to loss of ion homeostasis, including volume regulation, and increased Ca2+. The latter activates a number of nonspecific hydrolases (i.e., proteases, nucleases, and phospholipases) as well as calcium dependent kinases. Activation of calpain I, the Ca2+-dependent cysteine protease cleaves the death-promoting Bcl-2 family members Bid and Bax which translocate to mitochondrial membranes, resulting in release of truncated apoptosis-inducing factor (tAIF), cytochrome c and endonuclease in the case of Bid and cytocrome c in the case of Bax. tAIF translocates to cell nuclei, and together with cyclophilin A and phosphorylated histone H2AX (γH2AX) is responsible for DNA cleavage, a feature of programmed necrosis. Activated calpain I has also been shown to cleave the plasma membrane Na+–Ca2+ exchanger, which leads to build-up of intracellular Ca2+, which is the source of additional increased intracellular Ca2+. Cytochrome c in cellular apoptosis is a component of the apoptosome.

DNA damage activates nuclear poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1(PARP-1), a DNA repair enzyme. PARP-1 forms poly(ADP-ribose) polymers, to repair DNA, but when DNA damage is extensive, PAR accumulates, exits cell nuclei and travels to mitochondrial membranes, where it, like calpain I, is involved in AIF release from mitochondria. A fundamental distinction between necrosis and apoptosis is the loss of plasma membrane integrity; this is integral to the former but not the latter. As a consequence, lytic release of cellular constituents promotes a local inflammatory reaction, whereas the rapid removal of apoptotic bodies minimizes such a reaction. The distinction between the two modes of death is easily accomplished in vitro but not in vivo. Thus, although claims that certain drugs induce apoptosis have been made, these are relatively unconvincing. DNA fragmentation can occur in necrosis, leading to positive TUNEL staining. Conversely, when apoptosis is massive, it can exceed the capacity for rapid phagocytosis, resulting in the eventual appearance of secondary necrosis.

Two alternative pathways - either extrinsic (receptor-mediated) or intrinsic (mitochondria-mediated) - lead to apoptotic cell death. The initiation of cell death begins either at the plasma membrane with the binding of TNF or FasL to their cognate receptors or within the cell. The latter is due to the occurrence of intracellular stress in the form of biochemical events such as oxidative stress, redox changes, covalent binding, lipid peroxidation, and consequent functional effects on mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, microtubules, cytoskeleton, or DNA. The intrinsic mitochondrial pathway involves the initiator, caspase-9, which, when activated, forms an “apoptosome” in the cytosol, together with cytochrome c, which translocates from mitochondria, Apaf-1 and dATP. The apoptosome activates caspase-3, the central effector caspase, which in turn activates downstream factors that are responsible for the apoptotic death of a cell [1]. Intracellular stress either directly affects mitochondria or can lead to effects on other organelles, which then send signals to the mitochondria to recruit participation in the death process [1][2]Constitutively expressed nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) is a Ca2+-dependent cytosolic enzyme that forms nitric oxide (NO) from L-arginine, and NO reacts with the free radical such as superoxide (O2−) to form the very toxic free radical peroxynitrite (ONOO−). Free radicals such as ONOO−, O2 − and hydroxyl radical (OH−) damage cellular membranes and intracellular proteins, enzymes and DNA [1], [2] [3][4]


How it is Measured or Detected

Necrosis:

LDH is a soluble cytoplasmic enzyme that is present in almost all cells and is released into extracellular space when the plasma membrane is damaged. To detect the leakage of LDH into cell culture medium, a tetrazolium salt is used in this assay. In the first step, LDH produces reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) when it catalyzes the oxidation of lactate to pyruvate. In the second step, a tetrazolium salt is converted to a colored formazan product using newly synthesized NADH in the presence of an electron acceptor. The amount of formazan product can be colorimetrically quantified by standard spectroscopy. Because of the linearity of the assay, it can be used to enumerate the percentage of necrotic cells in a sample. [5]

The MTT assay is a colorimetric assay for assessing cell viability. NAD(P)H-dependent cellular oxidoreductase enzymes may reflect the number of viable cells present. These enzymes are capable of reducing the tetrazolium dye MTT 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide to its insoluble formazan, which has a purple color. Other closely related tetrazolium dyes including XTT, MTS and the WSTs. Tetrazolium dye assays can also be used to measure cytotoxicity (loss of viable cells) or cytostatic activity (shift from proliferation to quiescence) of potential medicinal agents and toxic materials. MTT assays are usually done in the dark since the MTT reagent is sensitive to light [6].

Propidium iodide (PI) is an intercalating agent and a fluorescent molecule used to stain necrotic cells. It is cell membrane impermeant so it stains only those cells where the cell membrane is destroyed. When PI is bound to nucleic acids, the fluorescence excitation maximum is 535 nm and the emission maximum is 617 nm [7] .

Alamar Blue (resazurin) fluorescent dye. The oxidized blue non fluorescent Alamar blue is reduced to a pink fluorescent dye in the medium by cell activity (O'Brien et al., 2000) (12).

Neutral red uptake, which is based on the ability of viable cells to incorporate and bind the supravital dye neutral red in lysosomes (Repetto et al., 2008)(13).

ATP assay: Quantification of ATP, signaling the presence of metabolically active cells (CellTiter-Glo; Promega).


Apoptosis:

TUNEL is a common method for detecting DNA fragmentation that results from apoptotic signalling cascades. The assay relies on the presence of nicks in the DNA which can be identified by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase or TdT, an enzyme that will catalyze the addition of dUTPs that are secondarily labeled with a marker. It may also label cells that have suffered severe DNA damage.

Caspase activity assays measured by fluorescence. During apoptosis, mainly caspase-3 and -7 cleave PARP to yield an 85 kDa and a 25 kDa fragment. PARP cleavage is considered to be one of the classical characteristics of apoptosis. Antibodies to the 85 kDa fragment of cleaved PARP or to caspase-3 both serve as markers for apoptotic cells that can be monitored using immunofluorescence [8].

Hoechst 33342 staining: Hoechst dyes are cell-permeable and bind to DNA in live or fixed cells. Therefore, these stains are often called supravital, which means that cells survive a treatment with these compounds. The stained, condensed or fragmented DNA is a marker of apoptosis. [9] [10]

Acridine Orange/Ethidium Bromide staining is used to visualize nuclear changes and apoptotic body formation that are characteristic of apoptosis. Cells are viewed under a fluorescence microscope and counted to quantify apoptosis.


References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Fujikawa, D.G. (2015), The role of excitotoxic programmed necrosis in acute brain injury, Comput Struct Biotechnol J, vol. 13, pp. 212-221.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Malhi, H. et al. (2010), Hepatocyte death: a clear and present danger, Physiol Rev, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 1165-1194.
  3. Kaplowitz, N. (2002), Biochemical and Cellular Mechanisms of Toxic Liver Injury, Semin Liver Dis, vol. 22, no. 2, http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/433631 (accessed on 20 January 2016).
  4. Kroemer, G. et al., (2009), Classification of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death, Cell Death Differ, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 3-11.
  5. Chan, F.K., K. Moriwaki and M.J. De Rosa (2013), Detection of necrosis by release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity, Methods Mol Biol, vol. 979, pp. 65–70.
  6. Berridge, M.V., P.M. Herst and A.S. Tan (2005), Tetrazolium dyes as tools in cell biology: new insights into their cellular reduction. Biotechnology Annual Review, vol. 11, pp 127-152.
  7. Moore, A, et al.(1998), Simultaneous measurement of cell cycle and apoptotic cell death,Methods Cell Biol, vol. 57, pp. 265–278.
  8. Li, Peng et al. (2004), Mitochondrial activation of apoptosis, Cell, vol. 116, no. 2 Suppl,pp. S57-59, 2 p following S59.
  9. Loo, D.T. (2002), TUNEL Assay an overview of techniques, Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 203: In Situ Detection of DNA Damage, chapter 2, Didenko VV (ed.), Humana Press Inc.
  10. Kubbies, M. and P.S. Rabinovitch (1983), Flow cytometric analysis of factors which influence the BrdUrd-Hoechst quenching effect in cultivated human fibroblasts and lymphocytes, Cytometry, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 276–281.
  11. Fink, S.L. and B.T. Cookson (2005), Apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necrosis: mechanistic description of dead and dying eukaryotic cells, Infect Immun, vol. 73, no. 4, pp.1907-1916.
  12. O'Brien J, Wilson I, Orton T, Pognan F. 2000. Investigation of the Alamar Blue (resazurin) fluorescent dye for the assessment of mammalian cell cytotoxicity. European journal of biochemistry / FEBS 267(17): 5421-5426.
  13. Repetto G, del Peso A, Zurita JL. 2008. Neutral red uptake assay for the estimation of cell viability/cytotoxicity. Nature protocols 3(7): 1125-1131.

Event: 188: N/A, Neuroinflammation

Short Name: N/A, Neuroinflammation

Key Event Component

Process Object Action
brain inflammation microglial cell pathological
brain inflammation astrocyte pathological

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Tissue

Organ term

Organ term
brain

Domain of Applicability


Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
rat Rattus norvegicus High NCBI
mouse Mus musculus High NCBI
human Homo sapiens Moderate NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
During brain development, adulthood and aging High
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Unspecific High

Neuroinflammation is observed in human, monkey, rat, mouse, and zebrafish, in association with neurodegeneration or following toxicant exposure. Some references (non-exhaustive list) are given below for illustration:

In human: Vennetti et al., 2006

In monkey (Macaca fascicularis): Charleston et al., 1994, 1996

Iin rat: Little et al., 2012; Zurich et al., 2002; Eskes et al., 2002

In mouse: Liu et al., 2012

In zebrafish: Xu et al., 2014.


Key Event Description

Neuroinflammation or brain inflammation differs from peripheral inflammation in that the vascular response and the role of peripheral bone marrow-derived cells are less conspicuous. The most easily detectable feature of neuroinflammation is activation of microglial cells and astrocytes. It is evidenced by changes in shape, increased expression of certain antigens, and accumulation and proliferation of the glial cells in affected regions (Aschner, 1998; Graeber & Streit, 1990; Monnet-Tschudi et al, 2007; Streit et al, 1999; Kraft and Harry, 2011; Claycomb et al., 2013). Upon stimulation by cytokines or inflammogens (e.g. from pathogens or from damaged neurons), both glial cell types activate inflammatory signalling pathways, which result in increased expression and/or release of inflammatory mediators such as cytokines, eicosanoids, and metalloproteinases (Dong & Benveniste, 2001), as well as in the production of reactive oxygen (ROS) and nitrogen species (RNS) (Brown & Bal-Price, 2003). Different types of activation states are possible for microglia and astrocytes, resulting in pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory signalling and other cellular functions (such as phagocytosis) (Streit et al., 1999; Nakajima and Kohsaka, 2004).

Therefore, neuroinflammation can have both neuroprotective/neuroreparative and neurodegenerative consequences (Carson et al., 2006 ; Monnet-Tschudi et al, 2007; Aguzzi et al., 2013 ; Glass et al., 2010). Under normal physiological conditions, microglial cells scan the nervous system for neuronal integrity (Nimmerjahn et al, 2005) and for invading pathogens (Aloisi, 2001; Kreutzberg, 1995; Kreutzberg, 1996; Rivest, 2009). They are the first type of cell activated (first line of defence), and can subsequently induce astrocyte activation (Falsig, 2008). Two distinct states of microglial activation have been described (Gordon, 2003; Kigerl et al, 2009; Maresz et al, 2008; Mosser & Edwards, 2008; Perego et al; Ponomarev et al, 2005): The M1 state is classically triggered by interferon-gamma and/or other pro-inflammatory cytokines, and this state is characterized by increased expression of integrin alpha M (Itgam) and CD86, as well as the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, IL-6), and it is mostly associated with neurodegeneration. The M2 state is triggered by IL-4 and IL-13 (Maresz et al, 2008; Perego et al, 2011; Ponomarev et al, 2007) and induces the expression of mannose receptor 1 (MRC1), arginase1 (Arg 1) and Ym1/2; it is involved in repair processes. The activation of astrocytes by microglia-derived cytokines or TLR agonists resembles the microglial M1 state (Falsig 2006). Although classification of the M1/M2 polarization of microglial cells may be considered as a simplification of authentic microglial reaction states (Ransohoff, 2016), a similar polarization of reactive astrocytes has been descibed recently Liddlelow et al., 2017): Interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1Þ), TNF and subcomponent q (C1q) released by activated microglial cells induce A1-reactive astrocytes, which lose the ability to promote neuronal survival, outgrowth, synaptogenesis and phagocytosis and induce the death of neurons and oligodendrocytes.


How it is Measured or Detected

Neuroinflammation, i.e. the activation of glial cells can be measured by quantification of cellular markers (most commonly), or of released mediators (less common). As multiple activation states exist for the two main cell types involved, it is necessary to measure several markers of neuroinflammation:

  1. Microglial activation can be detected based on the increased numbers of labeled microglia per volume element of brain tissue (due to increase of binding sites, proliferation, and immigration of cells) or on morphological changes. A specific microglial marker, used across different species, is CD11b. Alternatively various specific carbohydrate structures can be stained by lectins (e.g. IB4). Beyond that, various well-established antibodies are available to detect microglia in mouse tissue (F4/80), phagocytic microglia in rat tissue (ED1) or more generally microglia across species (Iba1). Transgenic mice are available with fluorescent proteins under the control of the CD11b promoter to easily quantify microglia without the need for specific stains.
  2. The most frequently used astrocyte marker is GFAP (99% of all studies) (Eng et al., 2000). This protein is highly specific for astrocytes in the brain, and antibodies are available for immunocytochemical detection. In neuroinflamatory brain regions, the stain becomes more prominent, due to an upregulation of the protein, a shape change/proliferation of the cells, and/or better accessibility of the antibody. Various histological quantification approaches can be used. Occasionally, alternative astrocytic markers, such as vimentin of the S100beta protein, have been used for staining of astrocytes (Struzynska et al., 2007). Antibodies for complement component 3 (C3), the most characteristic and highly upregulated marker of A1 neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are commercially available.
  3. All immunocytochemical methods can also be applied to cell culture models.
  4. In patients, microglial accumulation can be monitored by PET imaging, using [11C]-PK 11195 as a microglial marker (Banati et al., 2002).
  5. Activation of glial cells can be assessed in tissue or cell culture models also by quantification of sets of activation markers. This can for instance be done by PCR quantification of inflammatory factors, by measurement of the respective mediators, e.g. by ELISA-related immuno-quantification. Such markers include:
  • Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine expression (IL-1β; TNF-α, Il-6, IL-4); or expression of immunostimmulatory proteins (e.g. MHC-II)
  • Itgam, CD86 expression as markers of M1 microglial phenotype
  • Arg1, MRC1, as markers of M2 microglial phenotype

(for descriptions of techniques, see also  Falsig 2004; Lund 2006 ; Kuegler 2010; Monnet-Tschudi et al., 2011; Sandström et al., 2014; von Tobel et al.,  2014)

Regulatory example using the KE:Measurement of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in brain tissue, whose increase is a marker of astrocyte reactivity, is required by the US EPA in rodent toxicity studies for fuel additives (40 CFR 79.67), but is optional for other toxicant evaluations..


References

Aschner M (1998) Immune and inflammatory responses in the CNS: modulation by astrocytes. ToxicolLett 103: 283-287

Banati, R. B. (2002). "Visualising microglial activation in vivo." Glia 40: 206-217.     

Brown GC, Bal-Price A (2003) Inflammatory neurodegeneration mediated by nitric oxide, glutamate, and mitochondria. Mol Neurobiol 27: 325-355

Charleston JS, Body RL, Bolender RP, Mottet NK, Vahter ME, Burbacher TM. 1996. Changes in the number of astrocytes and microglia in the thalamus of the monkey Macaca fascicularis following long-term subclinical methylmercury exposure. NeuroToxicology 17: 127-138.

Charleston JS, Bolender RP, Mottet NK, Body RL, Vahter ME, Burbacher TM. 1994. Increases in the number of reactive glia in the visual cortex of Macaca fascicularis following subclinical long-term methyl mercury exposure. ToxicolApplPharmacol 129: 196-206.

Dong Y, Benveniste EN (2001) Immune Function of Astrocytes. Glia 36: 180-190

Eng LF, Ghirnikar RS, Lee YL (2000) Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein: GFAP-Thirty-One Years (1969-2000). NeurochemRes 25: 1439-1451

Eskes C, Honegger P, Juillerat-Jeanneret L, Monnet-Tschudi F. 2002. Microglial reaction induced by noncytotoxic methylmercury treatment leads to neuroprotection via interactions with astrocytes and IL-6 release. Glia 37(1): 43-52.

Falsig J, Latta M, Leist M. Defined inflammatory states in astrocyte cultures correlation with susceptibility towards CD95-driven apoptosis. J Neurochem. 2004  Jan;88(1):181-93.

Falsig J, Pörzgen P, Lund S, Schrattenholz A, Leist M. The inflammatory transcriptome of reactive murine astrocytes and implications for their innate immune function. J Neurochem. 2006 Feb;96(3):893-907.

Falsig J, van Beek J, Hermann C, Leist M. Molecular basis for detection of invading pathogens in the brain. J Neurosci Res. 2008 May 15;86(7):1434-47.

Glass CK, Saijo K, Winner B, Marchetto MC, Gage FH (2010). Mechanisms underlying inflammation in neurodegeneration. Cell. 2010 Mar 19;140(6):918-34.

Gordon S (2003) Alternative activation of macrophages. Nat Rev Immunol 3: 23-35

Graeber MB, Streit WJ (1990) Microglia: immune network in the CNS. Brain Pathol 1: 2-5

Kigerl KA, Gensel JC, Ankeny DP, Alexander JK, Donnelly DJ, Popovich PG (2009) Identification of two distinct macrophage subsets with divergent effects causing either neurotoxicity or regeneration in the injured mouse spinal cord. J Neurosci 29: 13435-13444

Kuegler PB, Zimmer B, Waldmann T, Baudis B, Ilmjärv S, Hescheler J, Gaughwin P, Brundin P, Mundy W, Bal-Price AK, Schrattenholz A, Krause KH, van Thriel C, Rao MS, Kadereit S, Leist M. Markers of murine embryonic and neural stem cells, neurons and astrocytes: reference points for developmental neurotoxicity testing. ALTEX. 2010;27(1):17-42

Kreutzberg GW (1995) Microglia, the first line of defence in brain pathologies. Arzneimttelforsch 45: 357-360

Kreutzberg GW (1996) Microglia : a sensor for pathological events in the CNS. Trends Neurosci 19: 312-318

Liddelow SA, Guttenplan KA, Clarke LE, Bennett FC, Bohlen CJ, Schirmer L, et al. 2017. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature 541(7638): 481-487.

Little AR, Miller DB, Li S, Kashon ML, O'Callaghan JP. 2012. Trimethyltin-induced neurotoxicity: gene expression pathway analysis, q-RT-PCR and immunoblotting reveal early effects associated with hippocampal damage and gliosis. Neurotoxicol Teratol 34(1): 72-82.

Liu Y, Hu J, Wu J, Zhu C, Hui Y, Han Y, et al. 2012. alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated neuroprotection against dopaminergic neuron loss in an MPTP mouse model via inhibition of astrocyte activation. J Neuroinflammation 9: 98.

Lund S, Christensen KV, Hedtjärn M, Mortensen AL, Hagberg H, Falsig J, Hasseldam H, Schrattenholz A, Pörzgen P, Leist M. The dynamics of the LPS triggered inflammatory response of murine microglia under different culture and in vivo conditions. J Neuroimmunol. 2006 Nov;180(1-2):71-87.

Maresz K, Ponomarev ED, Barteneva N, Tan Y, Mann MK, Dittel BN (2008) IL-13 induces the expression of the alternative activation marker Ym1 in a subset of testicular macrophages. J Reprod Immunol 78: 140-148

Monnet-Tschudi F, Zurich MG, Honegger P (2007) Neurotoxicant-induced inflammatory response in three-dimensional brain cell cultures. Hum Exp Toxicol 26: 339-346

Monnet-Tschudi, F., A. Defaux, et al. (2011). "Methods to assess neuroinflammation." Curr Protoc Toxicol Chapter 12: Unit12 19.         

Mosser DM, Edwards JP (2008) Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat Rev Immunol 8: 958-969

Nakajima K, Kohsaka S. 2004. Microglia: Neuroprotective and neurotrophic cells in the central nervous system. Current Drug Targets-Cardiovasc & Haematol Disorders 4: 65-84.

Perego C, Fumagalli S, De Simoni MG (2011) Temporal pattern of expression and colocalization of microglia/macrophage phenotype markers following brain ischemic injury in mice. J Neuroinflammation 8: 174

Ponomarev ED, Maresz K, Tan Y, Dittel BN (2007) CNS-derived interleukin-4 is essential for the regulation of autoimmune inflammation and induces a state of alternative activation in microglial cells. J Neurosci 27: 10714-10721

Ponomarev ED, Shriver LP, Maresz K, Dittel BN (2005) Microglial cell activation and proliferation precedes the onset of CNS autoimmunity. J Neurosci Res 81: 374-389

Ransohoff RM. 2016. A polarizing question: do M1 and M2 microglia exist? Nat Neurosci 19(8): 987-991.

Sandstrom von Tobel, J., D. Zoia, et al. (2014). "Immediate and delayed effects of subchronic Paraquat exposure during an early differentiation stage in 3D-rat brain cell cultures." Toxicol Lett. DOI : 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.02.001

Struzynska L, Dabrowska-Bouta B, Koza K, Sulkowski G (2007) Inflammation-Like Glial Response in Lead-Exposed Immature Rat Brain. Toxicol Sc 95:156-162

von Tobel, J. S., P. Antinori, et al. (2014). "Repeated exposure to Ochratoxin A generates a neuroinflammatory response, characterized by neurodegenerative M1 microglial phenotype." Neurotoxicology 44C: 61-70.

Venneti S, Lopresti BJ, Wiley CA. 2006. The peripheral benzodiazepine receptor (Translocator protein 18kDa) in microglia: from pathology to imaging. Prog Neurobiol 80(6): 308-322.

Xu DP, Zhang K, Zhang ZJ, Sun YW, Guo BJ, Wang YQ, et al. 2014. A novel tetramethylpyrazine bis-nitrone (TN-2) protects against 6-hydroxyldopamine-induced neurotoxicity via modulation of the NF-kappaB and the PKCalpha/PI3-K/Akt pathways. Neurochem Int 78: 76-85.

Zurich M-G, Eskes C, Honegger P, Bérode M, Monnet-Tschudi F. 2002. Maturation-dependent neurotoxicity of lead aceate in vitro: Implication of glial reactions. J Neurosc Res 70: 108-116.

 


Event: 1492: Tissue resident cell activation

Short Name: Tissue resident cell activation

Key Event Component

Process Object Action
cell activation involved in immune response increased

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Cellular

Domain of Applicability


Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
human Homo sapiens NCBI
Macaca fascicularis Macaca fascicularis NCBI
rat Rattus norvegicus NCBI
mouse Mus musculus NCBI
zebrafish Danio rerio NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
All life stages
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Unspecific

Extend to at least invertebrates

Not to plants and not to single-celled organisms

BRAIN:

Neuroinflammation is observed in human, monkey, rat, mouse, and zebrafish, in association with neurodegeneration or following toxicant exposure. Some references (non-exhaustive list) are given below for illustration:

In human: Vennetti et al., 2006

In monkey (Macaca fascicularis): Charleston et al., 1994, 1996

In rat: Little et al., 2012; Zurich et al., 2002; Eskes et al., 2002

In mouse: Liu et al., 2012

In zebrafish: Xu et al., 2014.


Key Event Description

Tissue resident cell activation is considered as a hallmark of inflammation irrespective of the tissue type. Strategically placed cells within tissues respond to noxious stimuli, thus regulating the recruitment of neutrophil and the initiation and resolution of inflammation (Kim and Luster, 2015).  Examples for these cells are resident immune cells, parenchymal cells, vascular cells, stromal cells, or smooth muscle cells.  These cells may be specific for a certain tissue, but they have a common tissue-independent role.

Under healthy conditions there is a homeostatic state, characterized as a generally quiescent cellular milieu. Various danger signals or alarmins that are involved in induction of inflammation like pathogen-associated molecular pattern molecules (PAMPs) and damage-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs) activate these resident cells in affected tissues.  

Examples of well-characterized DAMPs (danger signals or alarmins) (Saïd-Sadier  and Ojcius, 2012)

DAMPs

Receptors

Outcome of receptor ligation

Extracellular nucleotides
(ATP, ADP, adenosine)

PI, P2X and P2Y receptors (ATP, ADP); Al, A2A, A2B and A3 receptors (adenosine)

Dendritic cell (DC) maturation, chemotaxis, secretion of cytokines (IL-1β, IL-18), inflammation

Extracellular heat shock
proteins

CD14, CD91, scavenger
receptors, TLR4, TLR2, CD40

DC maturation, cytokine induction, DC, migration to lymph nodes

Extracellular HMGB1

RAGE, TLR2, TLR4

Chemotaxis, cytokine induction, DC activation, neutrophil recruitment, inflammation, activation of immune cells

Uric acid crystals

CD14, TLR2, TLR4

DC activation, cytokine induction, neutrophil recruitment, gout induction

Oxidative stress

Intracellular redox-sensitive proteins

Cell death, release of endogenous DAMPs, inflammation

Laminin

Integrins

Neutrophil recruitment, chemotaxis

S100 proteins or
calgranulins

RAGE

Neutrophil recruitment, chemotaxis, cytokine secretion, apoptosis

Hyaluronan

TLR2, TLR4, CD44

DC maturation, cytokine production, adjuvant activity

Activation refers to a phenotypic modification of the resident cells that includes alterations in their secretions, activation of biosynthetic pathways, production of pro-inflammatory proteins and lipids, and morphological changes. While these represent a pleiotropic range of responses that can vary with the tissue, there are a number of common markers or signs of activation that are measurable.

Examples of Common markers are

  • NF-kB
  • AP-1
  • Jnk
  • P38/mapk

These described commonalities allow the use of this KE as a hub KE in the AOP network. However, despite the similarities in the inflammatory process, the type of reactive cells and the molecules triggering their reactivity may be tissue-specific. Therefore, for practical reasons, a tissue specific description of the reactive cells and of the triggering factors is necessary in order to specify in a tissue-specific manner, which cell should be considered and what should be measured.

BRAIN

The most easily detectable feature of brain inflammation or neuroinflammation is activation of microglial cells and astrocytes. It is evidenced by changes in shape, increased expression of certain antigens, and accumulation and proliferation of the glial cells in affected regions (Aschner, 1998; Graeber & Streit, 1990; Monnet-Tschudi et al, 2007; Streit et al, 1999; Kraft and Harry, 2011; Claycomb et al., 2013). Upon stimulation by cytokines, chemokines or inflammogens (e.g. from pathogens or from damaged neurons), both glial cell types activate inflammatory signaling pathways, which result in increased expression and/or release of inflammatory mediators such as cytokines, eicosanoids, and metalloproteinases (Dong & Benveniste, 2001) (cf KE: pro-inflammatory mediators, increased), as well as in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitrogen species (RNS) (Brown & Bal-Price, 2003). Different types of activation states are possible for microglia and astrocytes, resulting in pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory signaling, and other cellular functions (such as phagocytosis) (Streit et al., 1999; Nakajima and Kohsaka, 2004). Therefore, neuroinflammation can have both neuroprotective/neuroreparative and neurodegenerative consequences (Carson et al., 2006; Monnet-Tschudi et al, 2007; Aguzzi et al., 2013 ; Glass et al., 2010). Under normal physiological conditions, microglial cells survey the nervous system for neuronal integrity (Nimmerjahn et al, 2005) and for invading pathogens (Aloisi, 2001; Kreutzberg, 1995; Kreutzberg, 1996; Rivest, 2009). They are the first type of cell activated (first line of defense), and can subsequently induce astrocyte activation (Falsig, 2008). Two distinct states of microglial activation have been described (Gordon, 2003; Kigerl et al, 2009; Maresz et al, 2008; Mosser & Edwards, 2008; Perego et al; Ponomarev et al, 2005): The M1 state is classically triggered by interferon-gamma and/or other pro-inflammatory cytokines, and this state is characterized by increased expression of integrin alpha M (Itgam) and CD86, as well as the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, IL-6), and it is mostly associated with neurodegeneration. The M2 state is triggered by IL-4 and IL-13 (Maresz et al, 2008; Perego et al, 2011; Ponomarev et al, 2007) and induces the expression of mannose receptor 1 (MRC1), arginase1 (Arg 1) and Ym1/2; it is involved in repair processes. The activation of astrocytes by microglia-derived cytokines or TLR agonists resembles the microglial M1 state (Falsig 2006). Although classification of the M1/M2 polarization of microglial cells may be considered as a simplification of authentic microglial reaction states (Ransohoff, 2016), a similar polarization of reactive astrocytes has been described recently Liddlelow et al., 2017): Interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1a), TNF and subcomponent q (C1q) released by activated microglial cells induce A1-reactive astrocytes, which lose the ability to promote neuronal survival, outgrowth, synaptogenesis and phagocytosis and induce the death of neurons and oligodendrocytes.

Regulatory examples using the KE

Measurement of GFAP in brain tissue, whose increase is a marker of astrocyte reactivity, is required by the US EPA in rodent toxicity studies for fuel additives (40 CFR 79.67), but is optional for other toxicant evaluations.

 


How it is Measured or Detected

In General:

Measurement targets are cell surface and intracellular markers; the specific markers may be cell and species-specific. 

Available methods include cytometry, immunohistochemistry, gene expression sequencing; western blotting, ELISA, and functional assays.

BRAIN 

Neuroinflammation, i.e. the activation of glial cells can be measured by quantification of cellular markers (most commonly), or of released mediators (less common). As multiple activation states exist for the two main cell types involved, it is necessary to measure several markers of neuroinflammation:

  1. Microglial activation can be detected based on the increased numbers of labeled microglia per volume element of brain tissue (due to increase of binding sites, proliferation, and immigration of cells) or on morphological changes. A specific microglial marker, used across different species, is CD11b. Alternatively various specific carbohydrate structures can be stained by lectins (e.g. IB4). Beyond that, various well-established antibodies are available to detect microglia in mouse tissue (F4/80), phagocytic microglia in rat tissue (ED1) or more generally microglia across species (Iba1). Transgenic mice are available with fluorescent proteins under the control of the CD11b promoter to easily quantify microglia without the need for specific stains.
  2. The most frequently used astrocyte marker is glial fibrillary acidic protein, GFAP (99% of all studies) (Eng et al., 2000). This protein is highly specific for astrocytes in the brain, and antibodies are available for immunocytochemical detection. In neuroinflamatory brain regions, the stain becomes more prominent, due to an upregulation of the protein, a shape change/proliferation of the cells, and/or better accessibility of the antibody. Various histological quantification approaches can be used. Occasionally, alternative astrocytic markers, such as vimentin of the S100beta protein, have been used for astrocyte staining (Struzynska et al., 2007). Antibodies for complement component 3 (C3), the most characteristic and highly upregulated marker of A1 neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are commercially available.
  3. All immunocytochemical methods can also be applied to cell culture models.
  4. In patients, microglial accumulation can be monitored by PET imaging, using [11C]-PK 11195 as a microglial marker (Banati et al., 2002).
  5. Activation of glial cells can be assessed in tissue or cell culture models also by quantification of sets of M1/M2 phenotype markers. This can for instance be done by PCR quantification, immunocytochemistry, immunoblotting.
  • Itgam, CD86 expression as markers of M1 microglial phenotype
  • Arg1, MRC1, as markers of M2 microglial phenotype

(for descriptions of techniques, see Falsig 2004; Lund 2006 ; Kuegler 2010; Monnet-Tschudi et al., 2011; Sandström et al., 2014; von Tobel et al.,  2014)


References

Chan JK, Roth J, Oppenheim JJ, Tracey KJ, Vogl T, Feldmann M, Horwood N, Nanchahal J., Alarmins: awaiting a clinical response. J Clin Invest. 2012 Aug;122(8):2711-9.

Davies LC, Jenkins SJ, Allen JE, Taylor PR, Tissue-resident macrophages, Nat Immunol. 2013 Oct;14(10):986-95. 

Escamilla-Tilch M, Filio-Rodríguez G, García-Rocha R, Mancilla-Herrera I, Mitchison NA, Ruiz-Pacheco JA, Sánchez-García FJ, Sandoval-Borrego D, Vázquez-Sánchez EA, The interplay between pathogen-associated and danger-associated molecular patterns: an inflammatory code in cancer? Immunol Cell Biol. 2013 Nov-Dec;91(10):601-10.

Hussell T, Bell TJ, Alveolar macrophages: plasticity in a tissue-specific context, Nat Rev Immunol. 2014 Feb;14(2):81-93.

Kim ND, Luster AD. The role of tissue resident cells in neutrophil recruitment ,Trends Immunol. 2015 Sep;36(9):547-55.

Saïd-Sadier N, Ojcius DM., Alarmins, inflammasomes and immunity. Biomed J. 2012 Nov-Dec;35(6):437-49.

Schaefer L, Complexity of danger: the diverse nature of damage-associated molecular patterns, J Biol Chem. 2014 Dec 19;289(51):35237-45.

BRAIN:

Aschner M (1998) Immune and inflammatory responses in the CNS: modulation by astrocytes. ToxicolLett 103: 283-287

Banati, R. B. (2002). "Visualising microglial activation in vivo." Glia 40: 206-217.

Brown GC, Bal-Price A (2003) Inflammatory neurodegeneration mediated by nitric oxide, glutamate, and mitochondria. Mol Neurobiol 27: 325-355

Charleston JS, Body RL, Bolender RP, Mottet NK, Vahter ME, Burbacher TM. 1996. Changes in the number of astrocytes and microglia in the thalamus of the monkey Macaca fascicularis following long-term subclinical methylmercury exposure. NeuroToxicology 17: 127-138.

Charleston JS, Bolender RP, Mottet NK, Body RL, Vahter ME, Burbacher TM. 1994. Increases in the number of reactive glia in the visual cortex of Macaca fascicularis following subclinical long-term methyl mercury exposure. ToxicolApplPharmacol 129: 196-206.

Dong Y, Benveniste EN (2001) Immune Function of Astrocytes. Glia 36: 180-190

Eng LF, Ghirnikar RS, Lee YL (2000) Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein: GFAP-Thirty-One Years (1969-2000). NeurochemRes 25: 1439-1451

Eskes C, Honegger P, Juillerat-Jeanneret L, Monnet-Tschudi F. 2002. Microglial reaction induced by noncytotoxic methylmercury treatment leads to neuroprotection via interactions with astrocytes and IL-6 release. Glia 37(1): 43-52.

Falsig J, Latta M, Leist M. Defined inflammatory states in astrocyte cultures correlation with susceptibility towards CD95-driven apoptosis. J Neurochem. 2004  Jan;88(1):181-93.

Falsig J, Pörzgen P, Lund S, Schrattenholz A, Leist M. The inflammatory transcriptome of reactive murine astrocytes and implications for their innate immune function. J Neurochem. 2006 Feb;96(3):893-907.

Falsig J, van Beek J, Hermann C, Leist M. Molecular basis for detection of invading pathogens in the brain. J Neurosci Res. 2008 May 15;86(7):1434-47.

Glass CK, Saijo K, Winner B, Marchetto MC, Gage FH (2010). Mechanisms underlying inflammation in neurodegeneration. Cell. 2010 Mar 19;140(6):918-34.

Gordon S (2003) Alternative activation of macrophages. Nat Rev Immunol 3: 23-35

Graeber MB, Streit WJ (1990) Microglia: immune network in the CNS. Brain Pathol 1: 2-5

Kigerl KA, Gensel JC, Ankeny DP, Alexander JK, Donnelly DJ, Popovich PG (2009) Identification of two distinct macrophage subsets with divergent effects causing either neurotoxicity or regeneration in the injured mouse spinal cord. J Neurosci 29: 13435-13444

Kuegler PB, Zimmer B, Waldmann T, Baudis B, Ilmjärv S, Hescheler J, Gaughwin P, Brundin P, Mundy W, Bal-Price AK, Schrattenholz A, Krause KH, van Thriel C, Rao MS, Kadereit S, Leist M. Markers of murine embryonic and neural stem cells, neurons and astrocytes: reference points for developmental neurotoxicity testing. ALTEX. 2010;27(1):17-42

Kreutzberg GW (1995) Microglia, the first line of defence in brain pathologies. Arzneimttelforsch 45: 357-360

Kreutzberg GW (1996) Microglia : a sensor for pathological events in the CNS. Trends Neurosci 19: 312-318

Liddelow SA, Guttenplan KA, Clarke LE, Bennett FC, Bohlen CJ, Schirmer L, et al. 2017. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature 541(7638): 481-487.

Little AR, Miller DB, Li S, Kashon ML, O'Callaghan JP. 2012. Trimethyltin-induced neurotoxicity: gene expression pathway analysis, q-RT-PCR and immunoblotting reveal early effects associated with hippocampal damage and gliosis. Neurotoxicol Teratol 34(1): 72-82.

Liu Y, Hu J, Wu J, Zhu C, Hui Y, Han Y, et al. 2012. alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated neuroprotection against dopaminergic neuron loss in an MPTP mouse model via inhibition of astrocyte activation. J Neuroinflammation 9: 98.

Lund S, Christensen KV, Hedtjärn M, Mortensen AL, Hagberg H, Falsig J, Hasseldam H, Schrattenholz A, Pörzgen P, Leist M. The dynamics of the LPS triggered inflammatory response of murine microglia under different culture and in vivo conditions. J Neuroimmunol. 2006 Nov;180(1-2):71-87.

Maresz K, Ponomarev ED, Barteneva N, Tan Y, Mann MK, Dittel BN (2008) IL-13 induces the expression of the alternative activation marker Ym1 in a subset of testicular macrophages. J Reprod Immunol 78: 140-148

Monnet-Tschudi F, Zurich MG, Honegger P (2007) Neurotoxicant-induced inflammatory response in three-dimensional brain cell cultures. Hum Exp Toxicol 26: 339-346

Monnet-Tschudi, F., A. Defaux, et al. (2011). "Methods to assess neuroinflammation." Curr Protoc Toxicol Chapter 12: Unit12 19.            

Mosser DM, Edwards JP (2008) Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat Rev Immunol 8: 958-969

Nakajima K, Kohsaka S. 2004. Microglia: Neuroprotective and neurotrophic cells in the central nervous system. Current Drug Targets-Cardiovasc & Haematol Disorders 4: 65-84.

Perego C, Fumagalli S, De Simoni MG (2011) Temporal pattern of expression and colocalization of microglia/macrophage phenotype markers following brain ischemic injury in mice. J Neuroinflammation 8: 174

Ponomarev ED, Maresz K, Tan Y, Dittel BN (2007) CNS-derived interleukin-4 is essential for the regulation of autoimmune inflammation and induces a state of alternative activation in microglial cells. J Neurosci 27: 10714-10721

Ponomarev ED, Shriver LP, Maresz K, Dittel BN (2005) Microglial cell activation and proliferation precedes the onset of CNS autoimmunity. J Neurosci Res 81: 374-389

Ransohoff RM. 2016. A polarizing question: do M1 and M2 microglia exist? Nat Neurosci 19(8): 987-991.

Sandstrom von Tobel, J., D. Zoia, et al. (2014). "Immediate and delayed effects of subchronic Paraquat exposure during an early differentiation stage in 3D-rat brain cell cultures." Toxicol Lett. DOI : 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.02.001

Struzynska L, Dabrowska-Bouta B, Koza K, Sulkowski G (2007) Inflammation-Like Glial Response in Lead-Exposed Immature Rat Brain. Toxicol Sc 95:156-162

von Tobel, J. S., P. Antinori, et al. (2014). "Repeated exposure to Ochratoxin A generates a neuroinflammatory response, characterized by neurodegenerative M1 microglial phenotype." Neurotoxicology 44C: 61-70.

Venneti S, Lopresti BJ, Wiley CA. 2006. The peripheral benzodiazepine receptor (Translocator protein 18kDa) in microglia: from pathology to imaging. Prog Neurobiol 80(6): 308-322.

Xu DP, Zhang K, Zhang ZJ, Sun YW, Guo BJ, Wang YQ, et al. 2014. A novel tetramethylpyrazine bis-nitrone (TN-2) protects against 6-hydroxyldopamine-induced neurotoxicity via modulation of the NF-kappaB and the PKCalpha/PI3-K/Akt pathways. Neurochem Int 78: 76-85.

Zurich M-G, Eskes C, Honegger P, Bérode M, Monnet-Tschudi F. 2002. Maturation-dependent neurotoxicity of lead aceate in vitro: Implication of glial reactions. J Neurosc Res 70: 108-116.

 


Event: 1493: Increased Pro-inflammatory mediators

Short Name: Increasaed pro-inflammatory mediators

Key Event Component

Process Object Action
acute inflammatory response increased

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Tissue

Domain of Applicability


Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
human Homo sapiens NCBI
Vertebrates Vertebrates NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
All life stages
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Unspecific

Key Event Description

Inflammatory mediators are soluble, diffusible molecules that act locally at the site of tissue damage and infection, and at more distant sites. They can be divided into exogenous and endogenous mediators.

Exogenous mediators of inflammation are bacterial products or toxins like endotoxin or LPS. Endogenous mediators of inflammation are produced from within the (innate and adaptive) immune system itself, as well as other systems. They can be derived from molecules that are normally present in the plasma in an inactive form, such as peptide fragments of some components of complement, coagulation, and kinin systems. Or they can be released at the site of injury by a number of cell types that either contain them as preformed molecules within storage granules, e.g. histamine, or which can rapidly switch on the machinery required to synthesize the mediators.

Table1: a non-exhaustive list of examples for pro-inflammatory mediators

Classes of inflammatory mediators

Examples

Pro-inflammatory cytokines

TNF-a, Interleukins (IL-1, IL-6, IL-8), Interferons  (IFN-g), chemokines (CXCL, CCL, GRO-α, MCP-1), GM-CSF

Prostaglandins

PGE2

Bradykinin

 

Vasoactive amines

histamine, serotonin

Reactive oxygen species (ROS)

O2-, H2O2

Reactive nitrogen species (RNS)

NO, iNOS

The increased production of pro-inflammatory mediators can have negative consequences on the parenchymal cells leading even to cell death, as described for TNF-a or peroxynitrite on neurons (Chao et al., 1995; Brown and Bal-Price, 2003). In addition, via a feedback loop, they can act on the reactive resident cells thus maintaining or exacerbating their reactive state; and by modifying elements of their signalling pathways, they can favour the M1 phenotypic polarization and the chronicity of the inflammatory process (Taetzsch et al., 2015).

Basically, this event occurs equally in various tissues and does not require tissue-specific descriptions. Nevertheless, there are some specificities such as the release of glutamate by brain reactive glial cells (Brown and Bal-Price, 2003; Vesce et al., 2007).The differences may rather reside in the type of insult favouring the increased expression and/or release of a specific class of inflammatory mediators, as well the time after the insult reflecting different stages of the inflammatory process. For these reasons, the analyses of the changes of a battery of inflammatory mediators rather than of a single one is a more adequate measurement of this KE.

 

 


How it is Measured or Detected

The specific type of measurement(s) might vary with tissue, environment and context and will need to be described for different tissue contexts  as used within different AOP descriptions.

In general, quantification of inflammatory markers can be done by:

  • PCR (mRNA expression)
  • ELISA
  • Immunocytochemistry
  • Immunoblotting

For descriptions of techniques, see Falsig 2004; Lund 2006 ; Kuegler 2010; Monnet-Tschudi et al., 2011; Sandström et al., 2014; von Tobel et al.,  2014
 


References

Brown GC, Bal-Price A (2003) Inflammatory neurodegeneration mediated by nitric oxide, glutamate, and mitochondria. Mol Neurobiol 27: 325-355

Dong Y, Benveniste EN (2001) Immune Function of Astrocytes. Glia 36: 180-190

Falsig J, Latta M, Leist M. Defined inflammatory states in astrocyte cultures correlation with susceptibility towards CD95-driven apoptosis. J Neurochem. 2004  Jan;88(1):181-93.

Falsig J, Pörzgen P, Lund S, Schrattenholz A, Leist M. The inflammatory transcriptome of reactive murine astrocytes and implications for their innate immune function. J Neurochem. 2006 Feb;96(3):893-907.

Falsig J, van Beek J, Hermann C, Leist M. Molecular basis for detection of invading pathogens in the brain. J Neurosci Res. 2008 May 15;86(7):1434-47.

Hamadi N, Sheikh A, Madjid N, Lubbad L, Amir N, Shehab SA, Khelifi-Touhami F, Adem A: Increased pro-inflammatory cytokines, glial activation and oxidative stress in the hippocampus after short-term bilateral adrenalectomy. BMC Neurosci 2016, 17:61.

Kuegler PB, Zimmer B, Waldmann T, Baudis B, Ilmjärv S, Hescheler J, Gaughwin P, Brundin P, Mundy W, Bal-Price AK, Schrattenholz A, Krause KH, van Thriel C, Rao MS, Kadereit S, Leist M. Markers of murine embryonic and neural stem cells, neurons and astrocytes: reference points for developmental neurotoxicity testing. ALTEX. 2010;27(1):17-42

Lund S, Christensen KV, Hedtjärn M, Mortensen AL, Hagberg H, Falsig J, Hasseldam H, Schrattenholz A, Pörzgen P, Leist M. The dynamics of the LPS triggered inflammatory response of murine microglia under different culture and in vivo conditions. J Neuroimmunol. 2006 Nov;180(1-2):71-87.

Monnet-Tschudi, F., A. Defaux, et al. (2011). "Methods to assess neuroinflammation." Curr Protoc Toxicol Chapter 12: Unit12 19.

Sandstrom von Tobel, J., D. Zoia, et al. (2014). "Immediate and delayed effects of subchronic Paraquat exposure during an early differentiation stage in 3D-rat brain cell cultures." Toxicol Lett. DOI : 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.02.001

Taetzsch T, Levesque S, McGraw C, Brookins S, Luqa R, Bonini MG, Mason RP, Oh U, Block ML (2015) Redox regulation of NF-kappaB p50 and M1 polarization in microglia. Glia 5, 63:423-440.

Vesce S, Rossi D, Brambilla L, Volterra A (2007) Glutamate release from astrocytes in physiological conditions and in neurodegenerative disorders characterized by neuroinflammation. Int Rev Neurobiol. 82 :57-71.

 

 


Event: 386: Decrease of neuronal network function

Short Name: Neuronal network function, Decreased

Key Event Component

Process Object Action
synaptic signaling decreased

AOPs Including This Key Event


Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Organ

Organ term

Organ term
brain

Domain of Applicability


Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
humans Homo sapiens High NCBI
rat Rattus norvegicus High NCBI
mice Mus sp. High NCBI
cat Felis catus High NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
During brain development High
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Mixed High

In vitro studies in brain slices applying electrophysiological techniques showed significant variability among species (immature rats, rabbits and kittens) related to synaptic latency, duration, amplitude and efficacy in spike initiation (reviewed in Erecinska et al., 2004).


Key Event Description

Biological state: There are striking differences in neuronal network formation and function among the developing and mature brain. The developing brain shows a slow maturation and a transient passage from spontaneous, long-duration action potentials to synaptically-triggered, short-duration action potentials.

Furthermore, at this precise developmental stage the neuronal network is characterised by "hyperexcitability”, which is related to the increased number of local circuit recurrent excitatory synapses and the lack of γ-amino-butyric acid A (GABAA)-mediated inhibitory function that appears much later. This “hyperexcitability” disappears with maturation when pairing of the pre- and postsynaptic partners occurs and synapses are formed generating population of postsynaptic potentials and population of spikes followed by developmental GABA switch. Glutamatergic neurotransmission is dominant at early stages of development and NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic currents are far more times longer than those in maturation, allowing more calcium to enter the neurons. The processes that are involved in increased calcium influx and the subsequent intracellular events seem to play a critical role in establishment of wiring of neural circuits and strengthening of synaptic connections during development (reviewed in Erecinska et al., 2004). Neurons that do not receive glutaminergic stimulation are undergoing developmental apoptosis.

During the neonatal period, the brain is subject to profound alterations in neuronal circuitry due to high levels of synaptogenesis and gliogenesis. For example, in neuroendocrine regions such as the preoptic area-anterior hypothalamus (POA-AH), the site of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) system is developmentally regulated by glutamatergic neurons. The changes in the expression of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor subunits NR1 and NR2B system begin early in postnatal development, before the onset of puberty, thereby playing a role in establishing the appropriate environment for the subsequent maturation of GnRH neurons (Adams et al., 1999).

Biological compartments: Neural network formation and function happen in all brain regions but it appears to onset at different time points of development (reviewed in Erecinska et al., 2004). Glutamatergic neurotransmission in hippocampus is poorly developed at birth. Initially, NMDA receptors play important role but the vast majority of these premature glutamatergic synapses are “silent” possibly due to delayed development of hippocampal AMPA receptors. In contrast, in the cerebral cortex the maturation of excitatory glutamatergic neurotransmission happens much earlier. The “silent” synapses disappear by PND 7-8 in both brain regions mentioned above.

There is strong evidence suggesting that NMDA receptor subunit composition controls synaptogenesis and synapse stabilization (Gambrill and Barria, 2011). It is established fact that during early postnatal development in the rat hippocampus, synaptogenesis occurs in parallel with a developmental switch in the subunit composition of NMDA receptors from NR2B to NR2A. It is suggested that early expression of NR2A in organotypic hippocampal slices reduces the number of synapses and the volume and dynamics of spines. In contrast, overexpression of NR2B does not affect the normal number and growth of synapses. However, it does increase spine motility, adding and retracting spines at a higher rate. The C terminus of NR2B, and specifically its ability to bind CaMKII, is sufficient to allow proper synapse formation and maturation. Conversely, the C terminus of NR2A was sufficient to stop the development of synapse number and spine growth. These results indicate that the ratio of synaptic NR2B over NR2A controls spine motility and synaptogenesis, and suggest a structural role for the intracellular C terminus of NR2 in recruiting the signalling and scaffolding molecules necessary for proper synaptogenesis. Interestingly, it was found that genetic deletion of NR3A accelerates glutamatergic synaptic transmission, as measured by AMPAR-mediated postsynaptic currents recorded in hippocampal CA1. Consistent, the deletion of NR3A accelerates the expression of the glutamate receptor subunits NR1, NR2A, and GluR1 sugesting that glutamatergic synapse maturation is critically dependent upon activation of NMDA-type glutamate receptors (Henson et al., 2012).

General role in biology: The development of neuronal networks can be distinguished into two phases: an early ‘establishment’ phase of neuronal connections, where activity-dependent and independent mechanisms could operate, and a later ‘maintenance’ phase, which appears to be controlled by neuronal activity (Yuste and Sur, 1999). These neuronal networks facilitate information flow that is necessary to produce complex behaviors, including learning and memory (Mayford et al., 2012).


How it is Measured or Detected

Methods that have been previously reviewed and approved by a recognized authority should be included in the Overview section above. All other methods, including those well established in the published literature, should be described here. Consider the following criteria when describing each method: 1. Is the assay fit for purpose? 2. Is the assay directly or indirectly (i.e. a surrogate) related to a key event relevant to the final adverse effect in question? 3. Is the assay repeatable? 4. Is the assay reproducible?

In vivo: The recording of brain activity by using electroencephalography (EEG), electrocorticography (ECoG) and local field potentials (LFP) assists towards the collection of signals generated by multiple neuronal cell networks. Advances in computer technology have allowed quantification of the EEG and expansion of quantitative EEG (qEEG) analysis providing a sensitive tool for time-course studies of different compounds acting on neuronal networks' function (Binienda et al., 2011). The number of excitatory or inhibitory synapses can be functionally studied at an electrophysiological level by examining the contribution of glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic inputs. The number of them can be determined by variably clamping the membrane potential and recording excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs or IPSCs) (Liu, 2004).

In vitro: Microelectrode array (MEA) recordings are also used to measure electrical activity in cultured neurons (Keefer et al., 2001, Gramowski et al., 2000; Gopal, 2003; Johnstone et al., 2010). MEAs can be applied in high throughput platforms to facilitate screening of numerous chemical compounds (McConnell et al., 2012). Using selective agonists and antagonists of different classes of receptors their response can be evaluated in a quantitative manner (Novellino et al., 2011; Hogberg et al., 2011). Patch clamping technique can also be used to measure neuronal network activity.


References

Adams MM, Flagg RA, Gore AC., Perinatal changes in hypothalamic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and their relationship to gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons. Endocrinology. 1999 May;140(5):2288-96.

Binienda ZK, Beaudoin MA, Thorn BT, Ali SF. (2011) Analysis of electrical brain waves in neurotoxicology: γ-hydroxybutyrate. Curr Neuropharmacol. 9: 236-239.

Erecinska M, Cherian S, Silver IA. (2004) Energy metabolism in mammalian brain during development. Prog Neurobiol. 73: 397-445.

Gambrill AC, Barria A. NMDA receptor subunit composition controls synaptogenesis and synapse stabilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011:108(14):5855-60.

Gopal K. (2003) Neurotoxic effects of mercury on auditory cortex networks growing on microelectrode arrays: a preliminary analysis. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 25: 69-76.

Gramowski A, Schiffmann D, Gross GW. (2000) Quantification of acute neurotoxic effects of trimethyltin using neuronal networks cultures on microelectrode arrays. Neurotoxicology 21: 331-342.

Henson MA, Larsen RS, Lawson SN, Pérez-Otaño I, Nakanishi N, Lipton SA, Philpot BD. (2012) Genetic deletion of NR3A accelerates glutamatergic synapse maturation. PLoS One. 7(8).

Hogberg HT, Sobanski T, Novellino A, Whelan M, Weiss DG, Bal-Price AK. (2011) Application of micro-electrode arrays (MEAs) as an emerging technology for developmental neurotoxicity: evaluation of domoic acid-induced effects in primary cultures of rat cortical neurons. Neurotoxicology 32: 158-168.

Johnstone AFM, Gross GW, Weiss D, Schroeder O, Shafer TJ. (2010) Use of microelectrode arrays for neurotoxicity testing in the 21st century Neurotoxicology 31: 331-350.

Keefer E, Norton S, Boyle N, Talesa V, Gross G. (2001) Acute toxicity screening of novel AChE inhibitors using neuronal networks on microelectrode arrays. Neurotoxicology 22: 3-12.

Liu G. (2004) Local structural balance and functional interaction of excitatory and inhibitory synapses in hippocampal dendrites. Nat Neurosci. 7: 373-379.

Mayford M, Siegelbaum SA, Kandel ER. (2012) Synapses and memory storage. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 4. pii: a005751.

McConnell ER, McClain MA, Ross J, LeFew WR, Shafer TJ. (2012) Evaluation of multi-well microelectrode arrays for neurotoxicity screening using a chemical training set. Neurotoxicology 33: 1048-1057.

Novellino A, Scelfo B, Palosaari T, Price A, Sobanski T, Shafer TJ, Johnstone AF, Gross GW, Gramowski A, Schroeder O, Jügelt K, Chiappalone M, Benfenati F, Martinoia S, Tedesco MT, Defranchi E, D'Angelo P, Whelan M. (2011) Development of micro-electrode array based tests for neurotoxicity: assessment of interlaboratory reproducibility with neuroactive chemicals. Front Neuroeng. 4: 4.

Yuste R, Peinado A, Katz LC. (1992) Neuronal domains in developing neocortex. Science 257: 665-669.


List of Adverse Outcomes in this AOP

Event: 341: Impairment, Learning and memory

Short Name: Impairment, Learning and memory

Key Event Component

Process Object Action
learning decreased
memory decreased

AOPs Including This Key Event

AOP ID and Name Event Type
Aop:13 - Chronic binding of antagonist to N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) during brain development induces impairment of learning and memory abilities AdverseOutcome
Aop:48 - Binding of agonists to ionotropic glutamate receptors in adult brain causes excitotoxicity that mediates neuronal cell death, contributing to learning and memory impairment. AdverseOutcome
Aop:54 - Inhibition of Na+/I- symporter (NIS) leads to learning and memory impairment AdverseOutcome
Aop:77 - Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor activation contributes to abnormal foraging and leads to colony death/failure 1 KeyEvent
Aop:78 - Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor activation contributes to abnormal role change within the worker bee caste leading to colony death failure 1 KeyEvent
Aop:87 - Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor activation contributes to abnormal foraging and leads to colony loss/failure KeyEvent
Aop:88 - Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor activation contributes to abnormal foraging and leads to colony loss/failure via abnormal role change within caste KeyEvent
Aop:89 - Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor activation followed by desensitization contributes to abnormal foraging and directly leads to colony loss/failure KeyEvent
Aop:90 - Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor activation contributes to abnormal roll change within the worker bee caste leading to colony loss/failure 2 KeyEvent
Aop:12 - Chronic binding of antagonist to N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) during brain development leads to neurodegeneration with impairment in learning and memory in aging AdverseOutcome
Aop:99 - Histamine (H2) receptor antagonism leading to reduced survival KeyEvent
Aop:17 - Binding of electrophilic chemicals to SH(thiol)-group of proteins and /or to seleno-proteins during brain development leads to impairment of learning and memory AdverseOutcome

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Individual

Domain of Applicability


Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
human Homo sapiens High NCBI
rat Rattus norvegicus High NCBI
fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster High NCBI
zebrafish Danio rerio High NCBI
gastropods Physa heterostropha High NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
During brain development High
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Mixed High

Basic forms of learning behavior such as habituation have been found in many taxa from worms to humans (Alexander, 1990). More complex cognitive processes such as executive function likely reside only in higher mammalian species such as non-human primates and humans. Recently, larval zebrafish has also been suggested as a model for the study of learning and memory (Roberts et al., 2013).


Key Event Description

Learning can be defined as the process by which new information is acquired to establish knowledge by systematic study or by trial and error (Ono, 2009). Two types of learning are considered in neurobehavioral studies: a) associative learning and b) non-associative learning. Associative learning is based on making associations between different events. In associative learning, a subject learns the relationship among two different stimuli or between the stimulus and the subject’s behaviour. On the other hand, non-associative learning can be defined as an alteration in the behavioural response that occurs over time in response to a single type of stimulus. Habituation and sensitization are some examples of non-associative learning.

The memory formation requires acquisition, retention and retrieval of information in the brain, which is characterised by the non-conscious recall of information (Ono, 2009). There are three main categories of memory, including sensory memory, short-term or working memory (up to a few hours) and long-term memory (up to several days or even much longer).

Learning and memory depend upon the coordinated action of different brain regions and neurotransmitter systems constituting functionally integrated neural networks (D’Hooge and DeDeyn, 2001). Among the many brain areas engaged in the acquisition of, or retrieval of, a learned event, the hippocampal-based memory systems have received the most study. For example, the hippocampus has been shown to be critical for spatial-temporal memory, visio-spatial memory, verbal and narrative memory, and episodic and autobiographical memory (Burgess et al., 2000; Vorhees and Williams, 2014). However, there is substantial evidence that fundamental learning and memory functions are not mediated by the hippocampus alone but require a network that includes, in addition to the hippocampus, anterior thalamic nuclei, mammillary bodies cortex, cerebellum and basal ganglia (Aggleton and Brown, 1999; Doya, 2000; Mitchell et al., 2002, Toscano and Guilarte, 2005; Gilbert et al., 2006, 2016). Thus, damage to variety of brain structures can potentially lead to impairment of learning and memory. The main learning areas and pathways are similar in rodents and primates, including man (Eichenbaum, 2000; Stanton and Spear, 1990).

For the purposes of this KE (AO), impaired learning and memory is defined as an organism’s inability to establish new associative or non-associative relationships, or sensory, short-term or long-term memories which can be measured using different behavioural tests described below.


How it is Measured or Detected

In laboratory animals: in rodents, a variety of tests of learning and memory have been used to probe the integrity of hippocampal function. These include tests of spatial learning like the radial arm maze (RAM), the Barnes maze, passive avoidance and Spontaneous alternation and most commonly, the Morris water maze (MWM). Test of novelty such as novel object recognition, and fear based context learning are also sensitive to hippocampal disruption. Finally, trace fear conditioning which incorporates a temporal component upon traditional amygdala-based fear learning engages the hippocampus. A brief description of these tasks follows.

1) RAM, Barnes, MWM are examples of spatial tasks, animals are required to learn the location of a food reward (RAM); an escape hole to enter a preferred dark tunnel from a brightly lit open field area (Barnes maze), or a hidden platform submerged below the surface of the water in a large tank of water (MWM) (Vorhees and Williams, 2014).

2) Novel Object recognition. This is a simpler task that can be used to probe recognition memory. Two objects are presented to animal in an open field on trial 1, and these are explored. On trial 2, one object is replaced with a novel object and time spent interacting with the novel object is taken evidence of memory retention – I have seen one of these objects before, but not this one (Cohen and Stackman, 2015).

3) Contextual Fear conditioning is a hippocampal based learning task in which animals are placed in a novel environment and allowed to explore for several minutes before delivery of an aversive stimulus, typically a mild foot shock. Upon reintroduction to this same environment in the future (typically 24-48 hours after original training), animals will limit their exploration, the context of this chamber being associated with an aversive event. The degree of suppression of activity after training is taken as evidence of retention, i.e., memory (Curzon et al., 2009).

4) Trace fear conditioning. Standard fear conditioning paradigms require animals to make an association between a neutral conditioning stimulus (CS, a light or a tone) and an aversive stimulus (US, a footshock). The unconditioned response (CR) that is elicited upon delivery of the footshock US is freezing behavior. With repetition of CS/US delivery, the previously neutral stimulus comes to elicit the freezing response. This type of learning is dependent on the amygdala, a brain region associated with, but distinct from the hippocampus. Introducing a brief delay between presentation of the neutral CS and the aversive US, a trace period, requires the engagement of the amygdala and the hippocampus (Shors et al., 2004).

In humans:  A variety of standardized learning and memory tests have been developed for human neuropsychological testing, including children (Rohlman et al., 2008). These include episodic autobiographical memory, perceptual motor tests, short and  long term memory tests, working memory tasks, word pair recognition memory; object location recognition memory. Some have been incorporated in general tests of intelligence (IQ) such as the WAIS and the Wechsler. Modifications have been made and norms developed for incorporating of tests of learning and memory in children. Examples of some of these tests include:

1) Rey Osterieth Complex Figure (RCFT) which probes a variety of functions including as visuospatial abilities, memory, attention, planning, and working memory (Shin et al., 2006).

2) Children’s Auditory Verbal Learning Test (CAVLT) is a free recall of presented word lists that yields measures of Immediate Memory Span, Level of Learning, Immediate Recall, Delayed Recall, Recognition Accuracy, and Total Intrusions. (Lezak 1994; Talley, 1986).

3) Continuous Visual Memory Test (CVMT) measures visual learning and memory. It is a free recall of presented pictures/objects rather than words but that yields similar measures of Immediate Memory Span, Level of Learning, Immediate Recall, Delayed Recall, Recognition Accuracy, and Total Intrusions. (Lezak, 1984; 1994).

4) Story Recall from Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS) Logical Memory Test Battery, a standardized neurospychological test designed to measure memory functions (Lezak, 1994; Talley, 1986).

5) Autobiographical memory (AM) is the recollection of specific personal events in a multifaceted higher order cognitive process. It includes episodic memory- remembering of past events specific in time and place, in contrast to semantic autobiographical memory is the recollection of personal facts, traits, and general knowledge. Episodic AM is associated with greater activation of the hippocampus and a later and more gradual developmental trajectory. Absence of episodic memory in early life (infantile amnesia) is thought to reflect immature hippocampal function (Herold et al., 2015; Fivush, 2011).

6) Staged Autobiographical Memory Task. In this version of the AM test, children participate in a staged event involving a tour of the hospital, perform a series of tasks (counting footprints in the hall, identifying objects in wall display, buy lunch, watched a video). It is designed to contain unique event happenings, place, time, visual/sensory/perceptual details. Four to five months later, interviews are conducted using Children’s Autobiographical Interview and scored according to standardized scheme (Willoughby et al., 2014).


Regulatory Significance of the AO

A prime example of impairments in learning and memory as the adverse outcome for regulatory action is developmental lead exposure and IQ function in children (Bellinger, 2012). Most methods are well established in the published literature and many have been engaged to evaluate the effects of developmental thyroid disruption. The US EPA and OECD Developmental Neurotoxicity (DNT) Guidelines (OCSPP 870.6300 or OECD 426) both require testing of learning and memory (USEPA, 1998; OECD, 2007) advising to use the following tests passive avoidance, delayed-matching-to-position for the adult rat and for the infant rat, olfactory conditioning, Morris water maze, Biel or Cincinnati maze, radial arm maze, T-maze, and acquisition and retention of schedule-controlled behaviour.  These DNT Guidelines have been deemed valid to identify developmental neurotoxicity and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes (Makris et al., 2009).

Also in the frame of the OECD GD 43 (2008) on reproductive toxicity, learning and memory testing may have potential to be applied in the context of developmental neurotoxicity studies. However, many of the learning and memory tasks used in guideline studies may not readily detect subtle impairments in cognitive function associated with modest degrees of developmental thyroid disruption (Gilbert et al., 2012).


References

Aggleton JP, Brown MW. (1999) Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal-anterior thalamic axis. Behav Brain Sci. 22: 425-489.

Alexander RD (1990) Epigenetic rules and Darwinian algorithms: The adaptive study of learning and development. Ethology and Sociobiology 11:241-303.

Bellinger DC (2012) A strategy for comparing the contributions of environmental chemicals and other risk factors to neurodevelopment of children. Environ Health Perspect 120:501-507.

Burgess N (2002) The hippocampus, space, and viewpoints in episodic memory. Q J Exp Psychol A 55:1057-1080. Cohen, SJ and Stackman, RW. (2015). Assessing rodent hippocampal involvement in the novel object recognition task. A review. Behav. Brain Res. 285: 105-1176.

Cohen, SJ and Stackman, RW. (2015). Assessing rodent hippocampal involvement in the novel object recognition task. A review. Behav. Brain Res. 285: 105-1176.

Curzon P, Rustay NR, Browman KE. Cued and Contextual Fear Conditioning for Rodents. In: Buccafusco JJ, editor. Methods of Behavior Analysis in Neuroscience. 2nd edition. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2009.

D'Hooge R, De Deyn PP (2001) Applications of the Morris water maze in the study of learning and memory. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 36:60-90.

Doya K. (2000) Complementary roles of basal ganglia and cerebellum in learning and motor control. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 10: 732-739.

Eichenbaum H (2000) A cortical-hippocampal system for declarative memory. Nat Rev Neurosci 1:41-50.

Fivush R. The development of autobiographical memory. Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:559-82.

Gilbert ME, Sanchez-Huerta K, Wood C (2016) Mild Thyroid Hormone Insufficiency During Development Compromises Activity-Dependent Neuroplasticity in the Hippocampus of Adult Male Rats. Endocrinology 157:774-787.

Gilbert ME, Rovet J, Chen Z, Koibuchi N. (2012) Developmental thyroid hormone disruption: prevalence, environmental contaminants and neurodevelopmental consequences. Neurotoxicology 33: 842-52.

Gilbert ME, Sui L (2006) Dose-dependent reductions in spatial learning and synaptic function in the dentate gyrus of adult rats following developmental thyroid hormone insufficiency. Brain Res 1069:10-22.

Herold, C, Lässer, MM, Schmid, LA, Seidl, U, Kong, L, Fellhauer, I, Thomann,PA, Essig, M and Schröder, J. (2015). Neuropsychology, Autobiographical Memory, and Hippocampal Volume in “Younger” and “Older” Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia. Front. Psychiatry, 6: 53.

Lezak MD (1984) Neuropsychological assessment in behavioral toxicology--developing techniques and interpretative issues. Scand J Work Environ Health 10 Suppl 1:25-29.

Lezak MD (1994) Domains of behavior from a neuropsychological perspective: the whole story. Nebr Symp Motiv 41:23-55.

Makris SL, Raffaele K, Allen S, Bowers WJ, Hass U, Alleva E, Calamandrei G, Sheets L, Amcoff P, Delrue N, Crofton KM. A retrospective performance assessment of the developmental neurotoxicity study in support of OECD test guideline 426. Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Jan;117(1):17-25.

Mitchell AS, Dalrymple-Alford JC, Christie MA. (2002) Spatial working memory and the brainstem cholinergic innervation to the anterior thalamus. J Neurosci. 22: 1922-1928.

OECD. 2007. OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals/ section 4: Health effects. Test no. 426: Developmental neurotoxicity study. www.Oecd.Org/dataoecd/20/52/37622194.Pdf [accessed may 21, 2012].

OECD (2008) Nr 43 GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON MAMMALIAN REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY TESTING AND ASSESSMENT. ENV/JM/MONO(2008)16

Ono T. (2009) Learning and Memory. Encyclopedia of neuroscience. M D. Binder, N. Hirokawa and U. Windhorst (Eds). Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg. pp 2129-2137.

Roberts AC, Bill BR, Glanzman DL. (2013) Learning and memory in zebrafish larvae. Front Neural Circuits 7: 126.

Rohlman DS, Lucchini R, Anger WK, Bellinger DC, van Thriel C. (2008) Neurobehavioral testing in human risk assessment. Neurotoxicology. 29: 556-567.

Shin, MS, Park, SY, Park, SR, Oeol, SH and Kwon, JS. (2006). Clinical and empirical applications of the Rey-Osterieth complex figure test. Nature Protocols, 1: 892-899.

Shors TJ, Miesegaes G, Beylin A, Zhao M, Rydel T, Gould E (2001) Neurogenesis in the adult is involved in the formation of trace memories. Nature 410:372-376.

Stanton ME, Spear LP (1990) Workshop on the qualitative and quantitative comparability of human and animal developmental neurotoxicity, Work Group I report: comparability of measures of developmental neurotoxicity in humans and laboratory animals. Neurotoxicol Teratol 12:261-267.

Talley, JL. (1986). Memory in learning disabled children: Digit span and eh Rey Auditory verbal learning test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Elseiver.

Toscano CD, Guilarte TR. (2005) Lead neurotoxicity: From exposure to molecular effects. Brain Res Rev. 49: 529-554.

U.S.EPA. 1998. Health effects guidelines OPPTS 870.6300 developmental neurotoxicity study. EPA Document 712-C-98-239.Office of Prevention Pesticides and Toxic Substances.

Vorhees CV, Williams MT (2014) Assessing spatial learning and memory in rodents. ILAR J 55:310-332.

Willoughby KA, McAndrews MP, Rovet JF. Accuracy of episodic autobiographical memory in children with early thyroid hormone deficiency using a staged event. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Jul;9:1-11.

 


Appendix 2

List of Key Event Relationships in the AOP