SNAPSHOT
Created at: 2018-02-23 15:17
AOP ID and Title:
Graphical Representation
Status
| Author status | OECD status | OECD project | SAAOP status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite | Under Development | 1.13 | Included in OECD Work Plan |
Abstract
This Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) describes the linkage between binding to sulfhydryl(SH)-/seleno-proteins and impairment of learning and memory, a deficit observed in autism spectrum disorders. Binding to SH-/ seleno-proteins has been defined as the Molecular Initiating Event (MIE). As the binding to the SH-/seleno-groups directly interferes with the function of the SH-/seleno-containing proteins, which are mainly located in mitochondria or are involved in the protection against oxidative stress, the MIE directly leads to the Key Event (KE), namely oxidative stress. In turn, oxidative stress, due either to increased ROS production or decreased anti-oxidant defenses leads to either cell injury/death or to glutamate dyshomeostasis. Glutamate dyshomeostasis, in turn, leads to cell injury/death via excitotoxicity due to overactivation of NMDA receptors, as described in AOP 48. Cell injury/death will affect the network formation and function, culminating in functional deficits such as impairment in learning and memory, defined as the Adverse Outcome (AO). Neuroinflammation is triggered secondary to cell injury/death and will exacerbate the neurotoxic pathway. According to the new AOP rules, neuroinflammation is defined by the two hub KEs: Tissue resident cell activation and increased pro-inflammatory mediators, which are common to all inflammatory processes across all tissues and permit connection with all AOPs where inflammation is an inherent mechanism. As an intermediary application of these new rules, the Key Events Relationships (KERs) linking these two hub KEs with cell injury/death are represented, but the description is found under the KERs linking neuroinflammation to cell injury/death. Two reasons account for it: (i) it allows to link this AOP with the other AOPs for neurotoxicity where neuroinflammation is included as a KE; and (ii) there is not sufficient literature for the empirical support allowing to treat the two KEs separately. The weight-of-evidence supporting the relationships between the described KEs is based mainly on effects observed after exposure to mercury (methylmercury, mercury chloride, thiomersal, mercury metal vapor), and some scarce studies on the effects of acrylamide and acrolein. Essentiality of the KEs for this AOP is moderate to strong, since blocking, preventing or attenuating an upstream KE is mitigating the downstream KE. The domain of applicability of this AOP is mainly defined for brain development, but a similar sequence of KEs can occur in adult brain leading to the same AO, also associated with neurodegenerative diseases.
Background
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) comprises a heterogeneous class of neurodevelopmental disorders characterized by deficits in both social behavior and cognitive function (Gilbert and Man, 2017). Besides genetic susceptibilities, environmental factors have been implicated in the etiology of ASD (Hallmayer et al., 2011; Li et al., 2017). Several epidemiological studies have observed an association between developmental exposure to mercury and ASD, where children with ASD had significantly higher levels of blood mercury (Li et al., 2017; Saghazadeh and Rezai, 2017; Mostafa et al., 2016 ; Jafari et al., 2017). But such an association does not establish causality. The preparation of this AOP demonstrates mechanistic plausibility for the epidemiological observations on the relationship between mercury exposure and an elevated risk of ASD development.
The primary target of mercury is the binding to thiol- and seleno-proteins, which will be the MIE. Other compounds, such as acrylamide and acrolein, share this MIE with the different forms of mercury (methylmercury, ethylmercury, mercury chloride and elemental mercury vapor) (Oliveira et al, 2017). However, since this AOP will focus on developmental exposure, and due to the lack of literature describing behavioral alterations following developmental exposure of acrylamide and acrolein, mercury will be used as the primary chemical initiator in the empirical support of the KERs.
Developmental exposure to mercury triggers a cascade of events including mitochondrial dysfunction, perturbations of anti-oxidant defense mechanisms, interferences with glutamate homeostasis, neuroinflammation, perturbation of cell differentiation (Farina et al., 2011; Antunes dos Santos et al., 2016; Morris et al., 2017; Kern et al., 2012), which resembles ASD endophenotypes (Loke et al., 2015), which includes chronic nitro-oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, decrease in glutathione content, neuroinflammation and epigenetic dysregulation of genes involved in neurodevelopment, synaptic function and inflammatory/immune pathways (Gilbert and Man, 2017 ; Morris et al., 2017). These molecular and cellular alterations underlie neurobehavioral effects, which are expressed as altered motor function and coordination, memory and learning disabilities, decrease in overall activity, depression-like behavior following neurodevelopmental mercury exposure, and as cognitive deficits, impaired social interactions, restrictive interests and repetitive behaviors in ASD (Landa et al., 2008). The neurocognitive domain, in particular dentate gyrus, hippocampus and cortex are particularly susceptible to the neurotoxicity of mercury in the developing brain (Morris et al., 2017; Sobolowski et al., 2011, 2013; Ceccatelli et al., 2013), therefore we will focus on impairment in learning and memory and consider it as the AO. We are aware that this AO does not cover all pathological symptoms of ASD, but the methods to measure it belong to the OECD regulatory toolbox, as required.
Summary of the AOP
Events
Molecular Initiating Events (MIE), Key Events (KE), Adverse Outcomes (AO)
| Sequence | Type | Event ID | Title | Short name |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MIE | 1487 | Binding, SH/seleno proteins | Binding, SH/seleno proteins |
| 2 | KE | 1392 | Oxidative Stress | Oxidative Stress |
| 3 | KE | 1488 | Glutamate dyshomeostasis | Glutamate dyshomeostasis |
| 4 | KE | 55 | N/A, Cell injury/death | N/A, Cell injury/death |
| 5 | KE | 188 | N/A, Neuroinflammation | N/A, Neuroinflammation |
| 6 | KE | 1492 | Tissue resident cell activation | Tissue resident cell activation |
| 7 | KE | 1493 | Increased Pro-inflammatory mediators | Increasaed pro-inflammatory mediators |
| 8 | KE | 386 | Decrease of neuronal network function | Neuronal network function, Decreased |
| 9 | AO | 341 | Impairment, Learning and memory | Impairment, Learning and memory |
Key Event Relationships
| Upstream Event | Relationship Type | Downstream Event | Evidence | Quantitative Understanding |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binding, SH/seleno proteins | adjacent | Oxidative Stress | High | |
| Oxidative Stress | adjacent | Glutamate dyshomeostasis | Moderate | |
| Glutamate dyshomeostasis | adjacent | N/A, Cell injury/death | High | |
| N/A, Cell injury/death | adjacent | N/A, Neuroinflammation | Moderate | |
| N/A, Cell injury/death | adjacent | Tissue resident cell activation | Moderate | |
| N/A, Neuroinflammation | adjacent | N/A, Cell injury/death | Moderate | |
| Increased Pro-inflammatory mediators | adjacent | N/A, Cell injury/death | Moderate | |
| N/A, Cell injury/death | adjacent | Decrease of neuronal network function | High | |
| Decrease of neuronal network function | adjacent | Impairment, Learning and memory | High | |
| Oxidative Stress | non-adjacent | N/A, Cell injury/death | High |
Stressors
| Name | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Methylmercuric(II) chloride | High |
| Mercuric chloride | High |
| Acrylamide | Moderate |
| Acrolein | Low |
| thiomersal | Low |
Overall Assessment of the AOP
Experimental and epidemiological evidences indicate that compared to the adult central nervous system (CNS), the developing CNS is generally more susceptible to toxicant exposure (Costa et al., 2004; Grandjean and Landrigan, 2006). Pre-natal and post-natal exposure may have long-term consequences, i.e. not detected immediately at the end of the exposure period. Such effects have been described on child development in communities with chronic low level mercury exposure (Castoldi et al., 2008; Debes et al., 2006; Grandjean et al., 2014; Lam et al., 2013).
The aim of this AOP is to capture the KEs and the KERs that occur after binding to thiol- and selenol groups of proteins, the MIE and the known molecular target of chemical initiators such as mercury, acrylamide and acrolein, and impairment in learning and memory, the AO, which is a neurotoxicity marker belonging to the OECD regulatory tool box. Data are most extensive for mercury as stressor during development; data for other stressors such as acrylamide and acrolein are much more limited. Chronic, low-dose prenatal MeHg exposure from maternal consumption of fish has been associated with endpoints of neurotoxicity in children, including poor performance on neurobehavioral tests, particularly on tests of attention, fine-motor function, language, visual-spatial abilities (e.g., drawing), and verbal memory (NRC, 2000). Some –SH- or –SeH-containing proteins have been demonstrated to be inhibited by MeHg either in vitro or in vivo, but a causal relationship has not been established between these inhibitory effects and the final pathological events (Oliveira, 2017). The analysis of the essentiality of the KEs and of the weight of evidence for the KERs supports a plausible mechanistic link between the MIE and the AO.
Domain of Applicability
Life Stage Applicability| Life Stage | Evidence |
|---|---|
| During brain development |
| Term | Scientific Term | Evidence | Links |
|---|---|---|---|
| rat | Rattus norvegicus | High | NCBI |
| mouse | Mus musculus | High | NCBI |
| human | Homo sapiens | Moderate | NCBI |
| Sex | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Unspecific | Moderate |
As autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental illness, this AOP is mainly focused on the developmental period, although it cannot be excluded that long-term exposure in adult may trigger a similar cascade of KEs leading also to impairment in learning and memory, as observed in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (Mutter et al., 2010). Regarding sex differences, ASD has a higher prevalence in male (4:1) (Fombonne, 2005). While no specific sex differences have been analyzed/described for most KEs, Curtis and coworkers (2011) observed a higher level of TNF-a in hippocampus of male prairie wolf than in female, both treated for 10 weeks with inorganic mercury, in the form of HgCl2; whereas Zhang and coworkers (2013) found a higher neuroinflammatory response associated with altered social behavior in female mice offspring than in male, following gestational exposure to HgCl2. However, after developmental methylmercury exposure, long-lasting behavioral alterations were more prominent in males (Ceccatelli et al., 2013; Castoldi et al., 2008). These discrepancies may be due to sex differences in kinetics or susceptibility (Vahter et al., 2006).
Essentiality of the Key Events
|
Support for Essentiality of KEs |
Defining Question Are downstream KEs and/or the AO prevented if an upstream KE is blocked ? |
High (Strong) |
Moderate |
Low (Weak) |
|
Direct evidence from specifically designed experimental studies illustrating essentiality for at least one of the important KEs (e.g. stop/reversibility studies, antagonism, knock out models, etc.) |
Indirect evidence that sufficient modification of an expected modulating factor attenuates or augments a KE leading to increase in KE down or AO |
No or contradictory experimental evidence on the essentiality of any of the KEs |
||
|
MIE Binding to SH-/seleno-proteins |
HIGH |
RATIONALE: Strong affinity binding (or exchange reaction) of mercury to SH- and seleno-proteins is well known. Such binding can directly inactivate the protein function or can indirectly facilitate protein denaturation. SH-containing proteins are more abundant than seleno-containing proteins. (For review: Farina et al., 2011). Carvalho et al (2011) reported inhibition of activity of NADPH-reduced seleno-enzyme thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) by inorganic and organic mercury compounds, consistent with binding of mercury also to the active site selenol/thiol. On treatment with 5 µM selenite and NADPH, TrxR inactivated by HgCl2 displayed almost full recovery of activity. Similarly, recovery of TrxR activity and cell viability by selenite was observed in HgCl2-treated HEK 293 cells. |
||
|
KE1 Oxidative stress |
HIGH |
RATIONALE: The deleterious consequences of oxidative stress are well accepted in various animal models. Oxygen radical scavengers, such as glutathione, catalase, selenium and cysteine blocked the methylmercury neurotoxicity in cerebral neuron culture (Park et al., 1996). In mouse primary cerebral cortical cultures, MeHg 5 μM depleted mono- and disulfide glutathione in neuronal, glial and mixed cultures. Supplementation with exogenous glutathione (glutathione monoethyl ester, GSHME) protected against MeHg-induced increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation and neuronal death (Rush, 2012). In brain mitochondrial-enriched fractions from adult male Swiss mice dosed with 40 mg MeHg/L drinking water for 21 days (this dose induces rotarod and open-field locomotor deficits; brain concentration ca 10 μM Hg), in vitro incubation with the antioxidant enzyme SOD, a superoxide scavenger, as well as catalase and GPx, which are peroxide detoxifying enzymes, blocked MeHg-induced increase in ROS formation (Franco, 2009). In mitochondrial-enriched fractions from whole brain minus cerebellum of adult male Swiss mice, 10-100 µM MeHg increased lipid peroxidation end-products and disrupted mitochondrial activity. Co-incubation with diphenyl diselenide (100 μM) completely prevented these effects (Meinerz, 2011). A strong exacerbation of methylmercury neurotoxicity was observed in 3D cultures treated simultaneously with promoters of hydroxyl radical formation (10 mM copper sulphate plus 100 mM ascorbate), showing that in pro-oxidant conditions when anti-oxidant defense mechanisms are overwhelmed, low, non-cytotoxic concentrations of mercury became potently neurotoxic. This indirectly suggests that ROS production is an important mechanism in mercury neurotoxicity (Sorg et al., 1998). |
||
|
KE2 Glutamate dyshomeostasis |
HIGH |
RATIONALE: There is an abundant literature showing that mercury interferes with glutamate uptake/transport, metabolism in astrocytes and neurons (see relative KERs) and as glutamate is the main excitatory transmitter, and is involved in memory processes, it is well accepted that perturbation of glutamate homeostasis has deleterious functional consequences. The use of microdialysis probes demonstrate that 10 or 100 mM of methylmercury induced a significant elevation of extracellular glutamate level in the frontal cortex of adult awake rats (Juarez et al., 2002). In addition, antagonists of NMDA receptors, such as MK-801 (non-competitive antagonist), D-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (APV, competitive antagonist) and 7-chlorokynurenic acid (antagonist of glycine site associated to NMDAR) blocked methylmercury-induced neurotoxicity in cerebral neuron cultures (Park et al., 1996). |
||
|
KE3 Cell Injury/death, increased |
HIGH |
RATIONALE: Cell injury/death is a highly converging node in AOPs. Decrease in synaptic connectivity or cell loss will in turn induce perturbations in the establishment of neuronal connections and trigger inflammatory responses, which through a feedback loop can exacerbate this KE. |
||
|
KE4 Neuroinflammation
KE4' Tissue resident cell activation
KE4'' Pro-inflammatory mediators, increased |
MODERATE |
RATIONALE: It is widely accepted in different experimental animal models that the use of minocycline, an antibiotic, which blocks microglial reactivity has protective effects, as have other interferences with any inflammatory mediators. However, we rate the essentiality of this KE as moderate (i) given the complexity of the neuroinflammatory response, having either reparative or neurodegenerative consequences, (ii) since few reported studies exist where adverse effects of mercury and acrylamide are decreased when the neuroinflammatory process is modulated (see below), and (iii) because the reported studies were not performed during the developmental exposure period (see below). Adult rats exposed to MeHg (5mg/kg bw) for 12 consecutive days exhibited piknotic nuclei in cerebellar granule cells, what was reverted by a co-administration of CA074 an inhibitor of cathepsin released by activated microglia. These observations strongly suggest that the mercury–induced neuropathological changes are secondary to microglial activation (Sakamoto et al., 2008). Farnesol (a sequiterpene) reduced astrogliosis (decreased GFAP) and microgliosis (decreased Iba1) and TNF-a, Il-1b and i-NOS in cortex, hippocampus and striatum of rats exposed to acrylamide (20 mg/kg bw for 4 weeks). This was associated with a marked improvement in motor coordination (Santhanasabapathy et al., 2015). (Santhanasabapathy et al., 2015). |
||
|
KE5 Decreased network formation and function |
HIGH |
RATIONALE: Mercury interferes strongly with glutamate neurotransmission, which is an important mechanism underlying memory function (for review: Featherstone, 2010). In addition, during brain development, glutamate has also trophic effects, by stimulating BDNF production or through the activation of the different glutamate receptors. The trophic effect of glutamate receptor activation is developmental stage-dependent and may play an important role in determining the selective survival of neurons that made proper connections (Balazs, 2006). |
||
|
AO Impairment of learning and memory |
HIGH |
RATIONALE: The neurocognitive domain, in particular dentate gyrus, hippocampus and cortex are particularly susceptible to the neurotoxicity of mercury in the developing brain (Morris et al., 2017; Sobolowski et al., 2011, 2013; Ceccatelli et al., 2013). Chronic, low-dose prenatal MeHg exposure from maternal consumption of fish has been associated with endpoints of neurotoxicity in children, including poor performance on neurobehavioral tests, particularly on tests of attention, fine-motor function, language, visual-spatial abilities (e.g., drawing), and verbal memory (NRC, 2000). Prenatal MeHg exposure is associated with childhood memory and learning deficits, particularly visual memory performance (Orenstein, 2017). |
||
Weight of Evidence Summary
Dose-response and temporal concordance of KEs
There is no study where all KEs are measured simultaneously after exposure to several doses, impeding a dose-response and concordance analysis. In one single study (in blue in the table), three downstream KEs were measured following pre-natal exposure to methylmercury. Comparisons of all animal studies show that doses used are ranging from 0.5 - 5 mg/kg; but dose-response was seldom performed. In these studies, the time (pre-natal, post-natal, lactation,...) and duration of exposure are quite diverse and no analysis of brain mercury content was made, so it is not possible to compare doses between studies. Therefore, based on the present data, it is impossible to define whether KEs up occur at lower doses and earlier time points than KEs down.
For in vitro studies, KEs up are often measured after acute exposure to high concentrations.
The following table summarizes concentrations/doses, time, and duration of exposure for the various test systems and KEs.
|
MIE |
KE1 |
KE2 |
KE3 |
KE4 |
KE5 |
AO |
|
Binding to SH-/seleno-proteins |
Oxidative stress |
Glutamate dyshomeostasis |
Cell injury/death |
Neuroinflammation |
Decreased network formation and function |
Impairment in learning and memory |
|
In vivo |
In vivo |
In vivo |
In vivo |
In vivo |
In vivo |
In vivo |
|
C57BL/6J mice dosed with 5 mg MeHg/L in drinking water during gestation and lactation Cytoplasmic and nuclear TrxR and Cytoplasmic Gpx were reduced in cerebral and cerebellar cortex of 22 days-old offspring (Ruszkiewicz, 2016)
Male C57BL/6NJcl mice dosed with 30 ppm methylmercury in drinking water for 6-weeks (Fujimura, 2017)
Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to methylmercury (1 mg/kg orally for 6 months) (Joshi, 2014)
Zebra fish brain exposed to Hg2+, MeHg 1.8 molar (measured in brain tissue), for 28 days. (Branco, 2012)
|
Male C57BL/6NJcl mice exposed to methylmercury (1.5 mg/kg/day for 6-weeks) (Fujimura, 2017)
Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to methylmercury (1 mg/kg orally for 6 months) (Joshi, 2014)
Zebra fish brain exposed to Hg2+, MeHg 1.8 molar (measured in brain tissue), for 28 days. (Branco, 2012)
|
Rat Young (3-4 weeks) dosed with acrylamide by gavage (5, 15, 30 mg/kg, 5 applications per week during 4 weeks) (Tian, 2018)
Microdialysis probe in adult Wistar rats showed that acute exposure to methylmercury (10, 100 mM) induced an increase release of extracellular glutamate (9.8 fold at 10 mM and 2.4 fold at 100 mM). This extracellular glutamate level remained elevated at least 90 min. (Juarez et al., 2002)
|
Rat, perinatal exposure to methylmercury (GD7-PD21, i.e. 35 days) 0.5 mg/kg bw/day in drinking water (Roda et al., 2008)
Rat Young (3-4 weeks) exposed to acrylamide by gavage (5, 15, 30 mg/kg, 5 applications per week during 4 weeks) (Tian, 2018)
Rat pregnant exposed to methylmercury (1.5 mg/kg orally) from GD5 till parturition (Jacob, 2017)
|
Rat, perinatal exposure to methylmercury (GD7-PD21, i.e. 35 days) 0.5 mg/kg bw/day in drinking water (Roda et al., 2008)
Monkeys, 6,12,18 months oral exposure 50 mg/kg bw (Charleston et al., 1996)
|
Mice dosed during postnatal week 1-3 with subcutaneous 2-5 mg mercury chloride/kg/once per week (Eddins et al., 2008) Pregnant rat dosed on GD 15 with 8 mg/kg of methylmercury by gavage. Offsprings were tested at day 16, 21 and 60. (Cagiano et al., 1990) Rat pregnant exposed to methylmercury (1.5 mg/kg orally) from GD5 till parturition (Jacob, 2017)
|
Mice dosed during postnatal week 1-3 with subcutaneous 2-5 mg mercury chloride/kg/once per week (Eddins et al., 2008) Pregnant rat dosed on GD 15 with 8 mg/kg of methylmercury by gavage. Offsprings were tested at day 16, 21 and 60. (Cagiano et al., 1990) Rat pregnant exposed to methylmercury (1.5 mg/kg orally) from GD5 till parturition (Jacob, 2017) Pregnant mice received 0.5 mg methylmercury/kg/day in drinking water from gestational day 7 until day 7 after delivery. Offspring behavior was monitored at 5-15 and 26-36 weeks of age. (Onishchenko et al., 2007) Balb mice exposed to methylmercury in diet (low dose: 1.5 mg/kg; high dose: 4.5 mg/kg) during 11 weeks (6 weeks prior mating, 3 weeks during gestation and 2 weeks post-partum). Offsprings tested at PD 15 showed an accumulation of Hg in brain (0.08 mg/kg for low dose and 0.25 mg/kg for the high dose) (Glover et al., 2009) |
|
In vitro |
In vitro |
In vitro |
In vitro |
In vitro |
|
|
|
Mouse primary cortical cultures exposed to 5 mM of methylmercury for 24h (Rush, 2012)
MeHg inhibits ex vivo rat thioredoxin reductase; IC50 0.158 μM (cerebral), (Wagner et al., 2010)
|
Mouse primary cortical cultures exposed to 5 mM of methylmercury for 24h (Rush, 2012)
Methylmercury (2-10 µM) in synaptic vesicles isolated from rat brain (with LD50 at 50 µM ). (Porciuncula et al., 2003)
|
Mouse astrocytes, neurons in mono- or co-cultures exposed to methylmercury 1-50 µM for 24h (Morken, 2005)
Methylmercury (2-10 µM) in synaptic vesicles isolated from rat brain (with LD50 at 50 µM). (Porciuncula et al., 2003 |
Mouse astrocytes, neurons in mono- or co-cultures exposed to methylmercury 1-50 µM for 24h (Morken, 2005) |
3D rat brain cell cultures 10 day treatment HgCl2 10-9-10-6M MeHgCl 10-9-3x10-7M (Monnet-Tschudi et al., 1996; Eskes et al., 2002) |
|
|
|
In human in vitro |
In human in vitro |
|
|
|
|
In human |
|
Human neuroblastoma cells (SH-SY5Y)exposed to 1 µM of methylmercury (Branco, 2017; Franco, 2009)
|
Human neuroblastoma cells (SH-SY5Y)exposed to 1 µM of methylmercury (Branco, 2017; Franco, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
Maternal peripartum hair mercury level was measured to assess prenatal mercury exposure. The concentrations of mercury was found in the range of 0.3-5.1 µg/g, similar to fish-eating population in US. Statistical analyses revealed that each ug/g increase in hair Hg was associated with a decrement in visual memory, learning and verbal memory. (Orenstein et al., 2014) |
|
Support for Biological Plausibility of KERs |
Defining Question Is there a mechanistic (i.e. structural or functional) relationship between KEup and KEdown consistent with established biological knowledge? |
High (Strong) |
Moderate |
Low (Weak) |
|
Extensive understanding of the KER based on extensive previous documentation and broad acceptance |
The KER is plausible based on analogy to accept biological relationship but scientific understanding is not completely established |
There is empirical support for a statistical association between KEs but the structural or functional relationship between them is not understood |
||
|
MIE to KE Oxidative stress |
HIGH |
RATIONALE: Thiol- and selenol containing proteins, which mainly belong to the anti-oxidant protections, have a high affinity for binding soft metals such as mercury (Farina, 2011). Binding to these thiol/sulfhydryl/SH/SeH groups results in structural modifications affecting the catalytic capacity, and thereby reducing the capacity to neutralize ROS. Extensive empirical support of interfering with MIE or using anti-oxidant compounds is available. Limited conflicted data. |
||
|
KE Oxidative stress to KE Glutamate (Glu) dyshomeostasis |
MODERATE |
RATIONALE: Due to the tight coupling of glutamate transporters with energy production, and to the important role of glutamate transporters in glutamate homeostasis, perturbations of energy metabolism such as mitochondrial dysfunction and increased production of ROS lead to glutamate dyshomeostasis (Boron and Boulpaep, 2003). Methylmercury was shown to inhibit both the H+-ATPase activity and vesicular glutamate uptake (Porciuncula et al., 2003). As, on one hand, ROS production can interfere with glutamate uptake, and on the other hand, glutamate accumulation leads to excitotoxicity and ROS production, the exact sequence of the KER is difficult to assess. But the fact that both KEs are involved in mercury-induced neurotoxicity is broadly accepted (Farina et al., 2011; Antunes dos Santos et al., 2016; Morris et al., 2017; Kern et al., 2012). |
||
|
KE Glutamate dyshomeostasis to KE Cell injury/death |
HIGH |
RATIONALE: Glutamate dyshomeostasis, in particular excess of glutamate in the synaptic cleft, leads to overactivation of ionotropic glutamate receptors, referred to as excitotoxicity. This, in turn, will cause cell injury/death via ROS production (see AOP 48). This KER is also inherent to the developing brain, where glutamate ionotropic receptors are expressed early in various neural cells and when NMDA receptors are expressed in neurons. There is empirical support for all three chemical initiators (mercury, acrylamide, acrolein). In addition, several experiments aiming at blocking glutamate excitotoxicity and the resulting ROS production are protective for cell injury/death. Limited conflicting data. |
||
|
KE Cell injury/death to KE Neuroinflammation |
MODERATE |
RATIONALE: It is widely accepted that cell/neuronal injury and death lead to neuroinflammation (microglial and astrocyte reactivities) in adult brain, and in the developing brain, where neuroinflammation was observed after cell injury/death induced by excitotoxic lesions (Acarin et al., 1997; Dommergues et al., 2003). Empirical support is available for all three chemical initiators (mercury, acrylamide, acrolein). Few experiments, showing a protection when blocking any feature of neuroinflammation have been described. There are some contradicting data showing an absence of neuroinflammatory response despite the occurrence of mercury-induced apotosis and slight behavioral alterations. |
||
|
KE Neuroinflammation to KE Cell injury/death |
MODERATE |
RATIONALE: In vitro co-culture experiments have demonstrated that reactive glial cells (microglia and astrocytes) can kill neurons via the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-a, IL-1b and IL-6 and/or ROS/RNS (Chao et al., 1995; Brown and Bal-Price, 2003; Kraft and Harry, 2011; Taetzsch and Block, 2013) and that interventions aiming at blocking these inflammatory biomolecules can rescue the neurons (Yadav et al., 2012; Brzozowski et al., 2015). Several reports showed that modulating mercury or acrylamide-induced neuroinflammation was protective for neurons. Because of the complexity of the neuroinflammatory response, that can have neuroprotective or neurodegenerative consequences depending on the duration, local environment or still unknown factors, the rating of this KER was kept as moderate. The vicious cycle between cell injury/death and neuroinflammation is well known and was described in other AOPs. Neuroinflammation could be considered as a modulating factor, but because of the numerous inhibiting experiments, it is considered as an essential KE. Some conflicting data due to the dual role of some inflammatory mediators have been reported. |
||
|
KE Cell injury/death to KE Decreased network formation and function |
HIGH |
RATIONALE: Neuronal network formation and functional crosstalk are established via synaptogenesis. It was shown that under physiological conditions components of the apoptotic machinery in the developing brain regulate synapse formation and neuronal connectivity (Dekkers et al., 2013). The brain’s electrical activity dependence on synapse formation is critical for proper neuronal communication. Glial cells are also involved in the establishment and stabilization of the neuronal network. Extensive experimental support for the adverse effects of mercury on synaptogenesis exist, establishing a strong link between mercury-induced apoptosis and/or neuronal loss and perturbations in a number of neurotransmitter systems (Jacob, 2017; Bridges, 2017) and perturbations of functionality (Falluel-Morel, 2007; Ferraro, 2009; Teixera, 2014; Onishchenko, 2007). Limited protective experiments and conflicting data reported. |
||
|
KE Decreased network formation and function to AO Impairment in learning and memory |
HIGH |
RATIONALE: A review on the Morris water maze (MWM), as an investigative tool of spatial learning and memory in laboratory rats pointed out that perturbed neuronal networks rather than neuronal death per se in certain regions is responsible for the impairment in MWM performance. Functional integrated neural networks that involve the coordination action of different brain regions are consequently important for spatial learning and memory performance (D'Hooge and De Deyn, 2001). Broad empirical support showing mercury-induced effects on learning and memory as consequence of network disruption (Sokolowski et al. 2013; Eddins et al., 2008; Glover et al., 2009). Similar observations were made in humans (Orenstein et al., 2014; Yorifuji et al., 2011). Interestingly, behavioral alterations were detected long time after exposure (delayed effects). Few conflicting data have been reported, but other behavioral deficits, such as alterations in motor activity and increased anxiety suggest that systems other than hippocampus-related learning and memory are also affected. |
||
|
KE oxidative stress to KE Cell injury/death |
HIGH |
RATIONALE: The central nervous system is especially vulnerable to free radical damage since it has a high oxygen consumption rate, an abundant lipid content and reduced levels of antioxidant enzymes (Coyle and Puttfarcken, 1993; Markesbery, 1997). The developing nervous system is particularly vulnerable to chemical insults (Grandjean & Landrigan, 2014). One reason for this higher vulnerability is the incapacity of immature neural cells to cope with oxidative stress by increasing glutathione (GSH) production (Sandström et al., 2017). Broad empirical support for mercury and acrylamide showing an association between increased ROS production and/or decreased protection against oxidative stress and apoptosis and/or necrosis (Lu et al., 2011; Sarafian et al., 1994; Allam et al., 2011; Lakshmi et al., 2012). Anti-oxidant treatments proved to be protective. Few conflicting data, except a mercury-induced upregulation of GSH level and GR activity as an adaptive mechanism following lactational exposure to methylmercury (10 mg/L in drinking water) associated with motor deficit, suggesting neuronal impairment (Franco et al., 2006). |
||
Quantitative Consideration
Some quantitative relationships have been described between the upstream early KEs (MIE to KE oxidative stress, Oxidative stress to Cell injury/death), although the diversity of test systems and posology (dosing/exposure amount and duration) hampers comparison between studies. It is more difficult to evaluate quantitative relationships between later downstream KEs, such as Neuroinflammation and Decreased Network Function. Neuroinflammation is a complex adaptive mechanism which is not yet completely understood; it can have neuroprotective or neurodegenerative consequences, depending on triggering signals, duration, microenvironment or other unknown influences, which may determine the outcome of the neuroinflammatory process. Decreased network function is currently difficult to quantify because quantitative technologies for mapping and understanding of brain networks (and their plasticity) are still under development.
Optimally, we would like data from a single type of test system showing that exposure to stressor, e.g. mercury, is correlated with changes in all KEs. Such models are emerging, using cells of human origin (Pamies et al., 2016; Sandström et al., 2016; Fritsche et al., 2017) or non-mammalian models, such as zebrafish (Geier et al., 2018; Padilla et al., 2018) and will allow in the future generation of quantitative data which may be used for in silico hazard prediction.
Considerations for Potential Applications of the AOP (optional)
- Contribution to the network of KEs/AOPs on Developmental Neurotoxicity (DNT)
- Establishing thiol/selenol binding as a MIE to enable its use in in silico modeling for prediction and in vitro hazard identification screening
- Generating quantitative data by measuring all KEs in a single model after repeated/long term exposure to a wide concentration range of the chemical initiators to facilitate the development of computational predictive approaches
References
Acarin, L., B. González, B. Castellano and A. J. Castro (1997). "Quantitative analysis of microglial reaction to a cortical excitotoxic lesion in the early postnatal brain." Exp.Neurol. 147: 410-417.
Allam, a et al. (2011) ‘Prenatal and perinatal acrylamide disrupts the development of cerebellum in rat: Biochemical and morphological studies.’, Toxicology and industrial health, 27, pp. 291–306. doi: 10.1177/0748233710386412.
Antunes Dos Santos, A., M. Appel Hort, M. Culbreth, C. Lopez-Granero, M. Farina, J. B. Rocha and M. Aschner (2016). "Methylmercury and brain development: A review of recent literature." J Trace Elem Med Biol 38: 99-107.
Balazs, R. (2006). "Trophic effect of glutamate." Curr Top Med Chem 6(10): 961-968.
Branco, V., J. Canario, J. Lu, A. Holmgren and C. Carvalho (2012). "Mercury and selenium interaction in vivo: effects on thioredoxin reductase and glutathione peroxidase." Free Radic Biol Med 52(4): 781-793.
Branco, V., L. Coppo, S. Sola, J. Lu, C. M. P. Rodrigues, A. Holmgren and C. Carvalho (2017). "Impaired cross-talk between the thioredoxin and glutathione systems is related to ASK-1 mediated apoptosis in neuronal cells exposed to mercury." Redox Biol 13: 278-287.
Bridges, K., Venables, B., Roberts, A., 2017. Effects of dietary methylmercury on the dopaminergic system of adult fathead minnows and their offspring. Environ Toxicol Chem 36, 1077-1084.
Brown, G. C. and A. Bal-Price (2003). "Inflammatory neurodegeneration mediated by nitric oxide, glutamate, and mitochondria." Mol Neurobiol 27(3): 325-355.
Brzozowski, M. J., P. Jenner and S. Rose (2015). "Inhibition of i-NOS but not n-NOS protects rat primary cell cultures against MPP(+)-induced neuronal toxicity." J Neural Transm 122(6): 779-788.
Cagiano, R., et al. (1990). "Evidence that exposure to methyl mercury during gestation induces behavioral and neurochemical changes in offspring of rats." Neurotoxicol Teratol 12(1): 23-28.
Carvalho, C.M.L., Lu, J., Zhang, X., Arnér, E.S.J., Holmgren, A. Effects of selenite and chelating agents on mammalian thioredoxin reductase inhibited by mercury: Implications for treatment of mercury poisoning (2011) FASEB Journal, 25 (1), pp. 370-381.
Castoldi, A. F., C. Johansson, N. Onishchenko, T. Coccini, E. Roda, M. Vahter, S. Ceccatelli and L. Manzo (2008). "Human developmental neurotoxicity of methylmercury: impact of variables and risk modifiers." Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 51(2): 201-214.
Castoldi, A. F., N. Onishchenko, C. Johansson, T. Coccini, E. Roda, M. Vahter, S. Ceccatelli and L. Manzo (2008). "Neurodevelopmental toxicity of methylmercury: Laboratory animal data and their contribution to human risk assessment." Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 51(2): 215-229.
Ceccatelli, S., R. Bose, K. Edoff, N. Onishchenko and S. Spulber (2013). "Long-lasting neurotoxic effects of exposure to methylmercury during development." J Intern Med 273(5): 490-497.
Charleston, J. S., R. L. Body, R. P. Bolender, N. K. Mottet, M. E. Vahter and T. M. Burbacher (1996). "Changes in the number of astrocytes and microglia in the thalamus of the monkey Macaca fascicularis following long-term subclinical methylmercury exposure." NeuroToxicology 17: 127-138.
Chao, C. C., S. Hu and P. K. Peterson (1995). "Glia, cytokines, and neurotoxicity." Crit.Rev.Neurobiol. 9: 189-205.
Coyle, J. and Puttfarcken, P. (1993) ‘Glutamate Toxicity’, Science, 262, pp. 689–95.
Curtis, J. T., A. N. Hood, Y. Chen, G. P. Cobb and D. R. Wallace (2010). "Chronic metals ingestion by prairie voles produces sex-specific deficits in social behavior: an animal model of autism." Behav Brain Res 213(1): 42-49.
Debes, F., E. Budtz-Jorgensen, P. Weihe, R. F. White and P. Grandjean (2006). "Impact of prenatal methylmercury exposure on neurobehavioral function at age 14 years." Neurotoxicol Teratol 28(5): 536-547.
Dekkers, M.P., Nikoletopoulou, V., Barde, Y.A., 2013. Cell biology in neuroscience: Death of developing neurons: new insights and implications for connectivity. J Cell Biol 203, 385-393.
D'Hooge R, De Deyn PP. (2001). Applications of the Morris water maze in the study of learning and memory. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 36: 60-90.
Dommergues, M. A., F. Plaisant, C. Verney and P. Gressens (2003). "Early microglial activation following neonatal excitotoxic brain damage in mice: a potential target for neuroprotection." Neuroscience 121(3): 619-628.
Eddins, D., et al. (2008). "Mercury-induced cognitive impairment in metallothionein-1/2 null mice." Neurotoxicol Teratol 30(2): 88-95.
Eskes, C., P. Honegger, L. Juillerat-Jeanneret and F. Monnet-Tschudi (2002). "Microglial reaction induced by noncytotoxic methylmercury treatment leads to neuroprotection via interactions with astrocytes and IL-6 release." Glia 37(1): 43-52.
Falluel-Morel, A., Sokolowski, K., Sisti, H.M., Zhou, X., Shors, T.J., Dicicco-Bloom, E., 2007. Developmental mercury exposure elicits acute hippocampal cell death, reductions in neurogenesis, and severe learning deficits during puberty. J Neurochem 103, 1968-1981.
Farina, M., J. B. Rocha and M. Aschner (2011). "Mechanisms of methylmercury-induced neurotoxicity: evidence from experimental studies." Life Sci 89(15-16): 555-563.
Ferraro, L., Tomasini, M.C., Tanganelli, S., Mazza, R., Coluccia, A., Carratu, M.R., Gaetani, S., Cuomo, V., Antonelli, T., 2009. Developmental exposure to methylmercury elicits early cell death in the cerebral cortex and long-term memory deficits in the rat. Int J Dev Neurosci 27, 165-174.
Featherstone, D. E. (2010). "Intercellular glutamate signaling in the nervous system and beyond." ACS Chem Neurosci 1(1): 4-12.
Fombonne, E. (2005). "Epidemiology of autistic disorder and other pervasive developmental disorders." J Clin Psychiatry 66 Suppl 10: 3-8.
Franco, J. L. et al. (2006) ‘Cerebellar thiol status and motor deficit after lactational exposure to methylmercury’, Environmental Research, 102(1), pp. 22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2006.02.003.
Franco, J. L., T. Posser, P. R. Dunkley, P. W. Dickson, J. J. Mattos, R. Martins, A. C. Bainy, M. R. Marques, A. L. Dafre and M. Farina (2009). "Methylmercury neurotoxicity is associated with inhibition of the antioxidant enzyme glutathione peroxidase." Free Radic Biol Med 47(4): 449-457.
Fujimura, M. and F. Usuki (2017). "In situ different antioxidative systems contribute to the site-specific methylmercury neurotoxicity in mice." Toxicology 392: 55-63.
Geier, M.C., Minick, D. J., Truong, L., Tilton, S., Anderson, K.A., Tanguay, R.L., 2018. Systematic developmental neurotoxicity assessment of a representative PAH Superfund mixture using zebrafish. TAAP DNT Special Issue (Submitted).
Gilbert, J. and H. Y. Man (2017). "Fundamental Elements in Autism: From Neurogenesis and Neurite Growth to Synaptic Plasticity." Front Cell Neurosci 11: 359.
Glover, C. N., et al. (2009). "Methylmercury speciation influences brain gene expression and behavior in gestationally-exposed mice pups." Toxicol Sci 110(2): 389-400.
Grandjean, P. and P. J. Landrigan (2006). "Developmental neurotoxicity of industrial chemicals." Lancet 368(9553): 2167-2178.
Grandjean, P. and Landrigan, P. J. (2014) ‘Neurobehavioural effects of developmental toxicity’, The Lancet Neurology, 13(3), pp. 330–338. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70278-3.
Hallmayer, J., S. Cleveland, A. Torres, J. Phillips, B. Cohen, T. Torigoe, J. Miller, A. Fedele, J. Collins, K. Smith, L. Lotspeich, L. A. Croen, S. Ozonoff, C. Lajonchere, J. K. Grether and N. Risch (2011). "Genetic heritability and shared environmental factors among twin pairs with autism." Arch Gen Psychiatry 68(11): 1095-1102.
Jacob, S., Thangarajan, S., 2017. Effect of Gestational Intake of Fisetin (3,3',4',7-Tetrahydroxyflavone) on Developmental Methyl Mercury Neurotoxicity in F1 Generation Rats. Biol Trace Elem Res 177, 297-315.
Jafari, T., N. Rostampour, A. A. Fallah and A. Hesami (2017). "The association between mercury levels and autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis." J Trace Elem Med Biol 44: 289-297.
Joshi, D., M. D. Kumar, S. A. Kumar and S. Sangeeta (2014). "Reversal of methylmercury-induced oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, and DNA damage by the treatment of N-acetyl cysteine: a protective approach." J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 33(2): 167-182.
Juarez, B. I., M. L. Martinez, M. Montante, L. Dufour, E. Garcia and M. E. Jimenez-Capdeville (2002). "Methylmercury increases glutamate extracellular levels in frontal cortex of awake rats." Neurotoxicol Teratol 24(6): 767-771.
Kern, J. K., D. A. Geier, L. K. Sykes, B. E. Haley and M. R. Geier (2016). "The relationship between mercury and autism: A comprehensive review and discussion." J Trace Elem Med Biol 37: 8-24.
Kraft, A. D. and G. J. Harry (2011). "Features of microglia and neuroinflammation relevant to environmental exposure and neurotoxicity." Int J Environ Res Public Health 8(7): 2980-3018.
Lakshmi, D. et al. (2012) ‘Ameliorating effect of fish oil on acrylamide induced oxidative stress and neuronal apoptosis in cerebral cortex’, Neurochemical Research, 37(9), pp. 1859–1867. doi: 10.1007/s11064-012-0794-1.
Lam, H. S., K. M. Kwok, P. H. Chan, H. K. So, A. M. Li, P. C. Ng and T. F. Fok (2013). "Long term neurocognitive impact of low dose prenatal methylmercury exposure in Hong Kong." Environ Int 54: 59-64.
Landa, R. J. (2008). "Diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders in the first 3 years of life." Nat Clin Pract Neurol 4(3): 138-147.
Li, D., H. O. Karnath and X. Xu (2017). "Candidate Biomarkers in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Review of MRI Studies." Neurosci Bull 33(2): 219-237.
Li, H., H. Li, Y. Li, Y. Liu and Z. Zhao (2018). "Blood Mercury, Arsenic, Cadmium, and Lead in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder." Biol Trace Elem Res 181(1): 31-37.
Loke, Y. J., A. J. Hannan and J. M. Craig (2015). "The Role of Epigenetic Change in Autism Spectrum Disorders." Front Neurol 6: 107.
Lu, T. H. et al. (2011) ‘Involvement of oxidative stress-mediated ERK1/2 and p38 activation regulated mitochondria-dependent apoptotic signals in methylmercury-induced neuronal cell injury’, Toxicology Letters. Elsevier Ireland Ltd, 204(1), pp. 71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.04.013.
Markesbery, W. R. (1997) ‘Oxidative stress hypothesis in Alzheimer’s disease’, Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 23(1), pp. 134–147. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(96)00629-6.
Meinerz, D. F., M. T. de Paula, B. Comparsi, M. U. Silva, A. E. Schmitz, H. C. Braga, P. S. Taube, A. L. Braga, J. B. Rocha, A. L. Dafre, M. Farina, J. L. Franco and T. Posser (2011). "Protective effects of organoselenium compounds against methylmercury-induced oxidative stress in mouse brain mitochondrial-enriched fractions." Braz J Med Biol Res 44(11): 1156-1163.
Monnet-Tschudi, F., M. G. Zurich and P. Honegger (1996). "Comparison of the developmental effects of two mercury compounds on glial cells and neurons in aggregate cultures of rat telencephalon." Brain Res 741(1-2): 52-59.
Morken, T.S., Sonnewald, U., Aschner, M., Syversen, T., 2005. Effects of methylmercury on primary brain cells in mono- and co-culture. Toxicol Sci 87, 169-175.
Morris, G., B. K. Puri, R. E. Frye and M. Maes (2017). "The Putative Role of Environmental Mercury in the Pathogenesis and Pathophysiology of Autism Spectrum Disorders and Subtypes." Mol Neurobiol.
Mostafa, G. A., G. Bjorklund, M. A. Urbina and L. Y. Al-Ayadhi (2016). "The levels of blood mercury and inflammatory-related neuropeptides in the serum are correlated in children with autism spectrum disorder." Metab Brain Dis 31(3): 593-599.
Mutter, J., J. Naumann, C. Sadaghiani, R. Schneider and H. Walach (2004). "Alzheimer disease: mercury as pathogenetic factor and apolipoprotein E as a moderator." Neuro Endocrinol Lett 25(5): 331-339.
National Research Council. 2000. Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9899.
Oliveira, C. S., B. C. Piccoli, M. Aschner and J. B. T. Rocha (2017). "Chemical Speciation of Selenium and Mercury as Determinant of Their Neurotoxicity." Adv Neurobiol 18: 53-83.
Onishchenko, N., Tamm, C., Vahter, M., Hokfelt, T., Johnson, J.A., Johnson, D.A., Ceccatelli, S., 2007. Developmental exposure to methylmercury alters learning and induces depression-like behavior in male mice. Toxicol Sci 97, 428-437.
Orenstein, S. T., et al. (2014). "Prenatal organochlorine and methylmercury exposure and memory and learning in school-age children in communities near the New Bedford Harbor Superfund site, Massachusetts." Environ Health Perspect 122(11): 1253-1259.
Padilla, S., Culbreth, M., Deborah, L.H., Olin, J., Jarema, K., Jensen, K., Tennant, A., 2018. Reviewer Selection Summary - Screening for Developmental Neurotoxicity Using Larval Zebrafish: Assessing the Preparation and the Predictive Capability. TAAP DNT Special Issue (Submitted).
Pamies, D., P. Barreras, K. Block, G. Makri, A. Kumar, D. Wiersma, L. Smirnova, C. Zang, J. Bressler, K. M. Christian, G. Harris, G. L. Ming, C. J. Berlinicke, K. Kyro, H. Song, C. A. Pardo, T. Hartung and H. T. Hogberg (2017). "A human brain microphysiological system derived from induced pluripotent stem cells to study neurological diseases and toxicity." ALTEX 34(3): 362-376.
Park, S. T., K. T. Lim, Y. T. Chung and S. U. Kim (1996). "Methylmercury-induced neurotoxicity in cerebral neuron culture is blocked by antioxidants and NMDA receptor antagonists." NeuroToxicology 17: 37-46.
Porciuncula, L. O., J. B. Rocha, R. G. Tavares, G. Ghisleni, M. Reis and D. O. Souza (2003). "Methylmercury inhibits glutamate uptake by synaptic vesicles from rat brain." Neuroreport 14(4): 577-580.
Roda, E., T. Coccini, D. Acerbi, A. Castoldi, G. Bernocchi and L. Manzo (2008). "Cerebellum cholinergic muscarinic receptor (subtype-2 and -3) and cytoarchitecture after developmental exposure to methylmercury: an immunohistochemical study in rat." J Chem Neuroanat 35(3): 285-294.
Rush, T., X. Liu, A. B. Nowakowski, D. H. Petering and D. Lobner (2012). "Glutathione-mediated neuroprotection against methylmercury neurotoxicity in cortical culture is dependent on MRP1." Neurotoxicology 33(3): 476-481.
Ruszkiewicz, J. A., A. B. Bowman, M. Farina, J. B. T. Rocha and M. Aschner (2016). "Sex- and structure-specific differences in antioxidant responses to methylmercury during early development." Neurotoxicology 56: 118-126.
Saghazadeh, A. and N. Rezaei (2017). "Systematic review and meta-analysis links autism and toxic metals and highlights the impact of country development status: Higher blood and erythrocyte levels for mercury and lead, and higher hair antimony, cadmium, lead, and mercury." Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 79(Pt B): 340-368.
Sakamoto, M., K. Miyamoto, Z. Wu and H. Nakanishi (2008). "Possible involvement of cathepsin B released by microglia in methylmercury-induced cerebellar pathological changes in the adult rat." Neurosci Lett 442(3): 292-296.
Sandström, J. et al. (2016) ‘Toxicology in Vitro Development and characterization of a human embryonic stem cell-derived 3D neural tissue model for neurotoxicity testing’, Tiv, pp. 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2016.10.001.
Santhanasabapathy, R., S. Vasudevan, K. Anupriya, R. Pabitha and G. Sudhandiran (2015). "Farnesol quells oxidative stress, reactive gliosis and inflammation during acrylamide-induced neurotoxicity: Behavioral and biochemical evidence." Neuroscience 308: 212-227.
Sarafian, T. A. et al. (1994) ‘Bcl-2 Expression Decreases Methyle Mercury-Induced Free-Radical Generation and Cel Killing in a Neural Cell Line’, Toxicol. Lett., 74(2), pp. 149–155.
Sokolowski, K., A. Falluel-Morel, X. Zhou and E. DiCicco-Bloom (2011). "Methylmercury (MeHg) elicits mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis in developing hippocampus and acts at low exposures." Neurotoxicology 32(5): 535-544.
Sokolowski, K., M. Obiorah, K. Robinson, E. McCandlish, B. Buckley and E. DiCicco-Bloom (2013). "Neural stem cell apoptosis after low-methylmercury exposures in postnatal hippocampus produce persistent cell loss and adolescent memory deficits." Dev Neurobiol 73(12): 936-949.
Sorg, O., B. Schilter, P. Honegger and F. Monnet-Tschudi (1998). "Increased Vulnerability of Neurones and Glial Cells to low Concentrations of Methylmercury in a Prooxidant Situation." Acta Neuropathol. 96: 621-627.
Taetzsch, T. and M. L. Block (2013). "Pesticides, microglial NOX2, and Parkinson's disease." J Biochem Mol Toxicol 27(2): 137-149.
Teixeira, F.B., Fernandes, R.M., Farias-Junior, P.M., Costa, N.M., Fernandes, L.M., Santana, L.N., Silva-Junior, A.F., Silva, M.C., Maia, C.S., Lima, R.R., 2014. Evaluation of the effects of chronic intoxication with inorganic mercury on memory and motor control in rats. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11, 9171-9185.
Tian, S.M., Ma, Y.X., Shi, J., Lou, T.Y., Liu, S.S., Li, G.Y., 2015. Acrylamide neurotoxicity on the cerebrum of weaning rats. Neural Regen Res 10, 938-943.
Vahter, M., A. Akesson, C. Liden, S. Ceccatelli and M. Berglund (2007). "Gender differences in the disposition and toxicity of metals." Environ Res 104(1): 85-95.
Wagner, C., Sudati, J.H., Nogueira, C.W., Rocha, J.B.T. (2010) In vivo and in vitro inhibition of mice thioredoxin reductase by methylmercury (2010) BioMetals, 23 (6), pp. 1171-1177.
Yadav, S., S. P. Gupta, G. Srivastava, P. K. Srivastava and M. P. Singh (2012). "Role of secondary mediators in caffeine-mediated neuroprotection in maneb- and paraquat-induced Parkinson's disease phenotype in the mouse." Neurochem Res 37(4): 875-884.
Yorifuji, T., et al. (2011). "Long-term exposure to methylmercury and psychiatric symptoms in residents of Minamata, Japan." Environ Int 37(5): 907-913.
Zhang, Y., V. J. Bolivar and D. A. Lawrence (2013). "Maternal exposure to mercury chloride during pregnancy and lactation affects the immunity and social behavior of offspring." Toxicol Sci 133(1): 101-111.
Appendix 1
List of MIEs in this AOP
Event: 1487: Binding, SH/seleno proteins
Short Name: Binding, SH/seleno proteins
AOPs Including This Key Event
| AOP ID and Name | Event Type |
|---|---|
| Aop:17 - Binding of electrophilic chemicals to SH(thiol)-group of proteins and /or to seleno-proteins during brain development leads to impairment of learning and memory | MolecularInitiatingEvent |
Stressors
| Name |
|---|
| Methylmercuric(II) chloride |
| Acrylamide |
| Acrolein |
Biological Context
| Level of Biological Organization |
|---|
| Molecular |
Evidence for Perturbation by Stressor
Overview for Molecular Initiating Event
Interferences of the chemical initiators with SH-/seleno-containing proteins
Mercury
MeHg can interact with different functional groups found abundantly in biomolecules (e.g., carboxylate, primary and secondary amine groups, etc; Rabestein 1978a); however, its affinity for thiol and selenol groups are 6 to 12 orders of magnitude superior to that for hard nucleophile centers found in biomolecules (Table 1). The constants described in Table 1 indicate that MeHg behaves as a strong soft electrophile, i.e., it has much higher affinity for the soft nucleophiles centers of thiol- and selenol-containing molecules (Pearson, 1963; Rabestein 1978; Arnold et al. 1986; Sugiura et al., 1976; 1978), than for hard nucleophiles centers found in the functional groups of proteins, RNA, DNA, carbohydrates and lipids (Rabeinstein, 1978a). Furthermore, the rate constant for the reaction of MeHg with thiol/thiolate (R-SH/R-S-) has been estimated to be about 6 x 108 M-1.sec-1, which indicates a very fast reaction (Rabenstein and Fairhurst, 1975). As corollary, the occurrence of free MeHg or bound to other ligands such as carboxylates, amines, chloride or hydroxyl anions in the physiological media of living cells is insignificant or nonexistent (George et al. 2008). The binding of MeHg to abundant low molecular mass thiols or LMM-SH (e.g., cysteine and reduced glutathione-GSH) and high molecular thiol-containing proteins or HMM-SH (e.g., albumin, hemoglobin, etc) is critical for the MeHg distribution from non-target to target organs and cells (Farina et al. 2017).
Table 1 - Affinity constants of methylmercury for important chemical groups found in biomolecules (adapted from a Rabestein, 1978, Rabestein and Bravob using different thiol-containing molecules with the arylmercurial para-mercurybenzenosulfonate, and cIsab 1991; and from dArnold et al. 1986 taking into consideration that the calculated formation constant of –Se-MeHg conjugates was 0.1 to 1.2 order greater than that of –S-MeHg). The values represent the Log of the constants.
|
Here we will not discuss factors that can modify MeHg distribution, specifically, we will assume that MeHg-S conjugates reach the mitochondria, where MeHg will bind to thiol- and selenol-containing proteins via the exchange reactions of MeHg from one –SH to another –SH or –SeH groups (Figure 1; Rabenstein 1978b; Rabenstein and Fairhurst, 1975; Rabenstein et al., 1974; 1982; Rabenstein and Reid, 1984; Farina et al. 2011, 2017; Dórea et al. 2013). But we have to emphasize that what we call of binding to –SH or –SeH groups is, in fact, an exchange reaction of MeHg from MeHg-S conjugates (e.g., MeHg-cysteine or MeHg-Cys and MeHg-glutathione or MeHg-SG conjugates; Figure 1) to a free thiol- or selenol-group from non-target or target proteins (Figure 1). Thus, the interaction of MeHg with its target proteins in the brain usually involves the exchange of MeHg from LMM-S-conjugate to a thiol or selenol group in different types of proteins. The Molecular Initiating Event (MIE) of targeting thiol- or selenol-groups in mitochondrial brain proteins is expected to start a cascade of related events, which will culminate in mitochondrial failure, oxidative stress, thiol depletion, glutamate dyshomeostasis, inflammation, cell death and learning disabilities (Wormser et al. 2012; Roos et al. 2012; Ciccatelli et al. 2010; Montgomery et al. 2008, Stringari et al. 208)
Figure 1 – Binding of MeHg (CH3Hg+) to target thiol- (HMM-SH) or selenol-containing proteins (HMM-SeH). Note that, in fact, the binding of MeHg to their high molecular mass target proteins is mediated by exchange reactions of MeHg from low molecular mass thiol (LMM-SH) molecules to HMM-SH (represented by Prot-SH) or HMM-SeH (represented by Prot-SeH). The scheme also demonstrated that MeHg conjugated with one LMM-SH (here represented by either Cys1-SHgCH3 or G1SHgCH3) can exchange with others LMM-SH (here represented by Cys2-SH or G2SH). After one exchange reaction, the conjugated Cys1-SHgCH3 and G1SHgCH3 release the free LMM-SH molecules Cys1-SH or G1SH. This type of exchange reaction can also occur in the extracellular space.
In view of the strong affinity of MeHg for thiol-groups and the relative high abundance of LMM-SH molecules over HMM-SH and high molecular mass selenol containing proteins (HMM-SeH) (Table 2), the probability of finding MeHg molecules bound to LMM-SH molecules is high. In fact, at physiological pH, the affinity (constant formation) of MeHg with GSH or hemoglobin was higher for GSH than hemoglobin (about 1 order of magnitude, Reid and Rabestein, 1982). However, the studies performed by professor Dallas Rabestein have clearly demonstrated that MeHg can migrate rapidly/easily from one LMM-SH to either other LMM-SH or HMM-SH groups and vice and verse (Rabenstein 1978b; Rabenstein and Fairhurst, 1975; Rabenstein et al., 1974; 1982; Rabenstein and Reid, 1984; Arnold et al. 1986; Farina et al. 2011, 2017; Dórea et al. 2013). The studies of Rabenstein and others have also pointed out that the affinity of MeHg for –SeH groups is higher than for analog –SH groups (Sugira et al. 1976; 1978; Arnold et al. 1986). Thus, one would guess that –SeH-containing molecules (i.e., selenoproteins) should be the preferential targets for MeHg (Farina et al. 2011). Although this can be the case, the great abundance of –SH-containing molecules over the very limited occurrence of selenoproteins (-SeH groups) and the potential change in the reactivity of specific –SH groups at the microenvironment of thiol-containing proteins, made the picture a little more complicate. Despite of this, several studies have demonstrate that the selenoenzymes glutathione peroxidase (GPx), thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) and 5′-deiodinase (DIO) can be inhibited after in vitro and in vivo exposure to MeHg (Li et al. 2008; Carvalho et al., 2008; 2011, Farina et al., 2009; Franco et al., 2009; Wagner et al., 2010; Branco et al., 2011; 2012; 2014, 2017; Dalla Corte et al., 2013; Meinerz et al., 2017)
Table 2 – Occurrence of Soft Nucleophilic Centers (SNC) that can bind the Soft Electrophile Methylmercury (MeHg) with high affinity. The thiol (-SH) groups can be found in thousands of proteins and in a few low molecular mass molecules. In constrast, the selenol (-SeH) group is found only in a few number of selenoproteins.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
aThe exact concentration of thiol-containing proteins is not well characterized (except for hemoglobin and albumin, which have reactive cysteinyl residues in the mmol/L range.) The pmol/L is an estimation. bThe actual concentrations of selenoproteins have not been well characterized and the presented range is an estimation.
The binding of MeHg to the –SH or –SeH groups of proteins can directly inactivate their function or can indirectly facilitate the denaturation of the proteins even after the exchanging or transference of MeHg to another LMM-SH, HMM-SH or HMM-SeH molecules (Farina et al. 2011; Farina et al. 2017). The hypothetical types of interactions between LMM-S-MeHg conjugates with thiol- and selenol-containing proteins (HMM-SH or HMM-SeH molecules) is depicted in Figure 2. As commented above, the binding of MeHg to redox sensitive thiol- or selenol-groups can disrupt the activity of enzymes or the biochemical role of non-enzymatic brain proteins. Some examples of thiol- and selenol-containing brain enzymes that have been reported to be disrupted after MeHg exposure are presented in Tables 3 and 4. Table 5 shows some of the mitochondrial processes that can be disturbed by MeHg.
Figure 2 – Hypothetical Binding of MeHg to different types of target proteins. The binding of MeHg to proteins can cause either a transitory inhibition of the protein fucntion (first line, the yellow protein was reactivated by interacting with LMM-SH or R-SH). The pink protein is an example of protein that after the binding of MeHg suffered a change in the structure in a such way that it cannot be reactivated by LMM-SH or R-SH. The third protein (blue) is an example of protein that was permanently denaturated after MeHg binding and even after the removal of MeHg the activity was not recovered. The same type of interactions can be applied to the selenol-containing proteins (i.e., the selenoproteins). Here we have not included the non-targets proteins or thiol-containing proteins that can bind MeHg without interfering in the protein function.
Table 3 – Examples of thiol- and selenol-containing proteins that are inhibited by MeHg
|
Protein (complex) activity inhibited by MeHg |
exposure |
Functional group |
organism |
|
|
|
Creatine Kinase (CK)
|
in vitro |
-SH |
Adult mice cerebral cortex C6 glioma cells |
50-1500 µM -IC50=87 µM 1-50 µM -IC50≈50 µM |
Glasser et al. 2010b |
|
Total GPx
|
in vitro
|
-SeH
|
SH-SY5Y cells |
0.5-2.0 µM Max. Inh.≈40% |
Franco et al. 2009 |
|
Mouse neuroblastoma |
2.5 - 5.0 µM (24h) Max. Inh.≈15-40% |
Kromidas et al. 1990 |
|||
|
PC12 cells |
1.0-7.5 µM (24h) – Max. Inh.≈7% |
Li et al. 2008 |
|||
|
Rat Fetal Telenchepalic cells |
Aggregating immature and mature cells (Cu2+ +ascorbate) + 1-100 nM MeHg |
Sorg et al. 1998 |
|||
|
Cytoplasmic TrxR
Nuclear TrxR
Cytoplasmic Gpx
|
in vivo |
|
mice (gestacional and lactacional) |
22 days-old C57BL/6J mice – 5 mg/L cerebrum- male ¯ cerebrum- female cerebellum- male ¯ cerebrum- female =
cerebrum- female = cerebrum- male ¯
cerebellum- female = cerebellum male ¯
cerebrum- male ¯ cerebrum- female cerebellum- male = cerebellum- female =
|
Ruszkiewicz et al. 2016 |
|
GPx1
GPx4
TrxR |
in vivo |
-SeH |
Adult Swiss male mice-
|
21 days - 40 mg/L water
Cerebellum (immunocontent and activity) ¯ Cortex (activity) ¯
Cerebellum (immunocontent and activity) ¯ Cortex (immunocontent and activity) ¯
Cerebellum (activity)¯ Cortex (activity)¯
|
Zemolin et al. 2012 |
|
Total GPx
|
in vivo
|
-SeH
|
Adult Swiss mice-cerebellum |
21 days - 40 mg/L water male ¯ female= |
Malagutti et al. 2009 |
|
1-, 11-, 21-day old mice (brain) |
gestational exposure (1,3 or 10 mg/L water) ≈29, 84 or280 µg MeHg/day/dam
|
Stringari et al. 2008 |
|||
|
Adult rat brain |
5 or 10 mg/kg MeHg – 7 days |
Cheng et al. 2005 |
|||
|
Thioredoxin Reductase (TrxR)
|
in vivo |
-SeH and –SH
|
Adult rat brain |
21 days - 5 mg/kg |
Dalla Corte et al. 2012 |
|
in vitro |
-SeH and –SH |
Adult mice brain |
50-1.000 nM-IC50≈100 nM |
Wagner et al. 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type 2 5′-deiodinase (DIO2)
|
in vitro |
-SeH |
NB41A3 neuroblastoma cells |
10-100 nM -IC50≈30 nM |
Mori et al. 2006 |
|
in vitro |
-SeH |
Pituitary tumors GH3 cells |
0.3-3 µM -IC50≈0.3-1.0 µM |
Mori et al. 2007 |
|
|
Glutamine synthetase |
in vitro
in vivo |
-SH |
Hypocampus 6-wk-old male ICR mice |
Adult male Sprague/Dawley rats Frontal cortex (0.1-100 µM -IC50≈50 µM) Hippocampus (0.1-100 µM -IC50≈50 µM) Cerebellum (0.1-100 µM -IC50≈20 µM)
6-wk-old ICR mice (2,4 and 10 mg/kg, i.p., once) Hippocampus - inhibition (12,17 and 21%)
|
Kwon and Park 2003[FT1] |
|
Ca2+-ATPase |
in vitro |
-SH |
Adult rat brain microsomes |
0.5-10 µM-IC50≈4 µM (Ca2+-uptake and ATP hydrolysis) |
Freitas et al. 1996 |
Table 4 – Some mitochondrial thiol- or selenol-containing proteins that are inhibited by MeHg
|
Mitochondrial creatine kinase (mtCK) |
in vivo |
-SH |
Adult Swiss male mice |
21 days - 40 mg/L water |
Glasser et al. 2010a; 2014 |
|
Complex I |
in vivo |
-SH |
Adult Swiss male mice, cerebral cortex |
21 days - 40 mg/L water |
Glasser et al. 2010a; 2013 |
|
Complex II |
in vivo |
-SH |
Adult Swiss male mice, cerebral cortex
Adult male rats |
21 days - 40 mg/L water
5 days, 10 mg/kg, p.o., cerebellum |
Glasser et al. 2010a; 2013 Mori et al. 2011 |
|
Succinate dehydratase |
in vivo |
-SH |
Adult Swiss male mice |
Brain and spinal cord, 7 days, 1 mg/kg, s.c. |
Bapu et al. 2003 |
|
Complex III |
in vivo |
-SH |
Adult Swiss male mice, cerebral cortex |
21 days - 40 mg/L water |
Glasser et al. 2010a; 2013 |
|
Complex IV |
in vivo |
-SH |
Adult Swiss male mice, cerebral cortex |
21 days - 40 mg/L water |
Glasser et al. 2010a; 2013 |
|
Mitochondrial total GPx |
in vivo |
-SeH |
Adult rats |
5 days – 10 mg/kg, p.o., cerebellum and cerebrum |
Mori et al. 2007 |
|
Mitochondrial total GPx |
in vivo |
-SeH |
Adult Swiss male mice brain |
21 days - 40 mg/L water |
Franco et al. 2009 |
Table 5– Mitochondrial processes that are disrupted by MeHg exposure and can be associated with over-production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxidative stress (OS).
|
Process disrupted |
|
Functional group |
organism-preparation |
|
|
|
MTT reduction
|
in vitro |
-SH |
Stratiatal synaptosomes male rats
|
7 day-old (0.5-10 µM -IC50≈5 µM) 14 day-old (0.5-10 µM -IC50≈5 µM) 21 day-old (0.5-10 µM -IC50≈5 µM) 2-3 month-old (0.5-10 µM -IC50≈8 µM)
|
Dreiem et al. 2005
|
|
|
2-3 month old (1-10 µM -IC50≈7.5 µM)
|
Dreiem & Seegal, 2007
|
|||
|
C6 glioma cells
|
IC50 between 1-10 µM (3-24 h exposure)
|
Belletti et al. 2002
|
|||
|
in vivo |
Adult male rat (brain)
|
21 days, 5 mg/kg; i.p.
|
Dalla Corte et al. 2013
|
||
|
DYm (mitochondrial membrane potential) |
in vitro |
-SH |
Stratiatal synaptosomes male rats |
7 day-old (0.5-2.5 µM -IC50≈0.3 µM) 14 day-old (0.5-2.5 µM -IC50≈0.4 µM) 21 day-old (0.5-2.5 µM -IC50≈0.6 µM) 2-3 month-old (0.5-2.5 µM -IC50≈0.6 µM)
|
Dreiem et al. 2005
|
|
Cerebellar granule cells (Marty and Atchison, 1997).
|
7-day-old Sprague–Dawley rats (0.5 µM – total collapse of DYm in 25 min
|
Limke and Atchison, 2002
|
|||
|
Astrocytes
|
1,5 and 10 µM – 15-40% collapse of DYm (1-6h)
|
Yin et al. 2007
|
|||
|
P19 murine embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells
|
1.5 µM –50% DYm collapse after 50 min
|
Polunas et al. 2011 |
|||
|
Day 5 P19-derived neurons |
1.5 µM –50% DYm collapse after 20 min |
||||
|
Ultrastructural changes consistent with an inhibition of mitochondrial respiration |
in vivo
in vivo
|
-SH and –SeH
-SH and –SeH
|
Sprague-Dawley rats cerebral cortex |
1.5 mg/kg day 2 to 50 (each 48h) |
O’Kusky (1983) |
|
Number of Mitochondria and ultrastructure |
Adult Swiss male mice |
21 days-40 mg/L water |
Glasser et al. 2014 |
||
|
Oxygen consumption |
Adult rats |
5 days – 10 mg/kg, p.o., cerebellum |
Mori et al. 2007 |
||
In short, the stable or transitory interaction (binding) of MeHg with critical thiol and selenol groups in target enzymes can disrupt the biological function of different types of enzymes (Table 3). In addition to enzymes, MeHg can disrupt the physiological activity of transporters and receptors. As indicated in Table 3, mitochondrial and non-mitochondrial oxidoreductases containing thiol and selenol redox centers have been reported to be disrupted by MeHg. The dysregulation of cerebral glutathione (GSH and GSSG) and thioredoxin [Trx(SH)2] systems by MeHg (Farina et al. 2011; Branco et al. 2017) can impair the fine cellular redox balance via disruption of sensitive cysteinyl- or thiol-containing proteins (Go and Jones, 2013; Go et al. 2015; Jones 2015).
Acrylamide and Acrolein
Acrylamide and acrolein are a,β-unsaturated (conjugated) reactive molecule, which can react with thiol (-SH) and amino (-NH2) groups in proteins proteins (LoPachin, 2004; LoPachin et al. 2007; 2009; 2011; Friedman, 2003; Bent et al. 2016; Martyniuk et al.2011; LoPachin and Gavin, 2014 ). However, the rate constant for the reaction between acrylamide with thiol/thiolate groups are much lower than that for MeHg (Table x). The rate of reaction of these compounds with HMM-SH and LMM-SH is slow but can occur under physiological conditions (Tong et al. 2004; LoPachin, 2004). The inhibition of brain enzyme by acrylamide have been studied and the inhibition caused by acrylamide in some HMM-SH can be reversible (Howland et al. 1980 ). Despite of this, we can infer that some targets of MeHg and acrylamide and acrolein can overlap. Accordingly, some targets reported in Table 3 for MeHg have also been shown to be inhibited after exposure to acrylamide (Yousef and Demerdash, 2006; Lapadula et al. 1989; Kopańska et al. 2015). Of particular toxicological significance, both MeHg, acrylamide and acrolein have been reported to change the normal dynamic of synaptic function via interaction with specific HMM-SH (LoPachin et al. 2004 ; Farina et al. 2017). Acrylamide can also be metabolized to an epoxide intermediate (glycidamide), which can also form adducts with cysteinyl residues in HMM-SH target proteins (Bergmark et al. 1991).
Table 6-Second order rate constants for the reaction of MeHg Acrylamide and acrolein with thiol/thiolate groups of biomolecules
|
GADPH-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase
Domain of Applicability
| Life Stage | Evidence |
|---|---|
| During brain development, adulthood and aging | High |
| Sex | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Unspecific | High |
Key Event Description
Thiol (SH)- and seleno-containing proteins are located in different organelles and in the cytoplasm of the different neural cell types (Comini, 2016; Hoppe et al. 2008; Barbosa et al. 2017; Zhu et al. 2017). Binding of chemicals to these proteins induces either their inactivation or favor their degradation and/or inhibition of their synthesis (Farina et al. 2009; Zemolin et al. 2012). Therefore, we will directly include in the description of this MIE and of the protein of interest the main chemicals (mercury, acrylamide and acrolein) able to bind and to interfere with these proteins. (See Evidences for perturbations of this MIE by stressors)
How it is Measured or Detected
The interference of MeHg, acrylamide and acrolein with the normal catalytic function of thiol- or selenol-containing enzymes, transporters, channels, etc can be determined by different analytical methodologies. The activity of enzymes are typically determined by spectrophotometric, spectrofluorometric or radiometrical methodologies that quantify the rate of product appearance or the disappearance of substrate. The examples of HMM-SH or HMM-SeH enzymes that are altered by MeHg, acrylamide and acrolein presented in Table 3 (Table 3 and 4) are normally determined by spectrophotometric methodologies. Below we give a brief description on how to measure the enzymes listed in Table(s) 3 and 4.
Creatine Kinase (CK). CK activity can be measured using phosphocreatine and ADP as substrates. The formed creatine is estimated colorimetrically at 520 nm as described by Hughes (Hughes, 1962).
Glutathione (GSH): Total glutathione level was determined using the Glutathione Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, CS0260) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantity of GSH was assessed by measuring the continuous reduction of 5,5’-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB) to 5-thio-2-nitrobenzoic acid (TNB) by spectrophotometry (Synergy MX) at 412 nm. Measures were taken at 1 min intervals for 5 minutes. The production rate of TNB is proportional to the concentration of glutathione up to 2 µM and values for GSH concentration were calculated as the difference between TNB absorbance values measured at time 0 versus 5 min with reduced glutathione as standard.
Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) is usually determined spectroscopically at 340 nm using a coupled assay with glutathione reductase (GR). Another methodologies can be found in Flohé, L., Günzler, W.A. (1984). The reaction mixture usually contains (in mmol/L or mM) 50 phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 10-100 µl sample, 0.24-1.0 U of glutathione reductase (usually from yeast), 1-4 GSH, 0.6-4.3 EDTA and 0.15-0.34 NADPH . The reaction is started by adding 10-100 µl peroxide (hydrogen peroxide, cumene hydroperoxide or tert-butylperoxide) to a final concentration of 0.1-2.0 mM . For quantification in crude extracts, the addition of azide is required to inhibit the catalase reaction, when H2O2 is used as substrate. The decrease in absorbance is followed at 340 nm from 1 to 10 min. The blank is made by substituting the sample by the same buffer in which the sample is prepared.
Thioredoxin Reductase (TrxR). TrxR activity is normally measured by the method of Holmgren and Bjornstedt (1995). The reaction mixture consisted of the following (in mM): 0.24 NADPH, 10 EDTA, 100 potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 5 5,5’-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB), and 0.2mg/mL of BSA. The partially purified TrxR was added (to final concentration of 6–10 microg/ml of protein) to the cuvette containing the reaction mixture, and the absorbance is followed at 412 nm for 4 min.
Type 2 5’-deiodinase (DIO 2). Deiodinase is usually determined by measuring [125]I released from [125I]reverse T3 (rT3) in in a gamma counter after separation of [125]I by ion exchange chromatography (Dowex 50W-X2 resin) as described by Mori et al., 1996. The reaction medium contains (in mM): 100 potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 1 EDTA, 20 dithiothreitol (DTT), 1 6-proryl-2-thiouracil (PTU), and 2 nM rT3.
Glutamine synthetase (GS). GS can be measured by different methods: a) the of formation of inorganic phosphate (Pi), b) ADP at 340 nm (using the enzymes pyruvate kinase and lactate dehydrogenase as coupled reactions), c) glutamine (e.g., determining the transformation of 14C-glutamate to 14C-glutamine) or d) the colorimetric formation of glutamylhydroxamate assay method. The glutamylhydroxamate assay method usually is determined in the presence of (in mM) 0.1 ml of enzyme solution (0.1 ml) plus 0.9 ml of the reaction solution with 50 imidazole-HCl buffer, 20 MgCI2, 25 mercaptoethanol, 50 sodium L-glutamate, 100 hydroxylamine, and 10 ATP. After incubation, 1.5 ml of FeCl3 (370 mM FeCl3, 670 mM HCl, and 200 mM trichloroacetic acid) is added. The mixture is centrifuged and the supernatant is used to determine the absorbance at 535 nm (Patel et al., 1982; Pishak and Phillips, 1979).
Ca2+-ATPase. Ca2+-ATPase can be determined directly by the quantification of inorganic phosphate released from ATP or indirectly by determining the 45Ca2+ uptake by brain microsomes (Freitas et al. 1996). The assay mixture for Ca2+ uptake determination has (in mM) 50 MOPS-Tris (pH 7.4), 5 MgCl2, , 1 ATP, 20 Pi (inorganic phosphate) and 0.04 CaCl2 (0.5 µCi/ml 45CaCl2). The microsome is then filtrated through Millipore filters (0.45 µm) and flushed with La(NO3) 3 and the radioactivity in the filters is counted on a scintillation counter.
Complex I. Complex I activity was measured by the rate of NADH-dependent ferricyanide reduction as described in (Cassina and Radi,1996). In short, the NADH dehydrogenase can be determined in by the reduction of ferricyanide at 420 nm in the presence of (in mM) 0.2 NADH and 0.5 ferrycianide. The activity is determine in the presence of 5 µM rotenone.
Complex II and Complex II-III. The complex II activity or succinate -2,6-dichloroindophenol (DCIPI) reductase activity and the complex III (succinate: cytochrome c oxidoreductase or complex II-CoQ-complex III activity) can be determined by the method of Fischer in the presence of (in mM): 50 potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 20 succinate, 2 KCN and 0.05 DCIPI at 600 nm or 0.05 of oxidized cytochrome c at 550 nm.
Complex IV. Cytochrome c oxidase (complex IV) activity can be determined spectrophotometrically by the method of Rustin et al. 1994 at 550 nm.
References
Arnold, A.P., Tan, K.-S., Rabenstein, D.L. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of the Solution Chemistry of Metal Complexes. 23. Complexation of Methylmercury by Selenohydryl-Containing Amino Acids and Related Molecules (1986) Inorganic Chemistry, 25 (14), pp. 2433-2437.
Bapu, C., Sood, P.P., Nivsarkar, M. Organelle specific enzyme markers as indicators of methylmercury neurotoxicity and antidotal efficacy in mice (2003) BioMetals, 16 (2), pp. 279-284.
Barbosa, N.V., Nogueira, C.W., Nogara, P.A., De Bem, A.F., Aschner, M., Rocha, J.B.T. Organoselenium compounds as mimics of selenoproteins and thiol modifier agents (2017) Metallomics, 9 (12), pp. 1703-1734.
Belletti S, Orlandini G, Vettori MV, Mutti A, Uggeri J, Scandroglio R, Alinovi R, Gatti R. Time course assessment of methylmercury effects on C6 glioma cells: submicromolar concentrations induce oxidative DNA damage and apoptosis. Journal of neuroscience research. 2002 Dec 1;70(5):703-11.
Bent GA, Fairman RA, Grierson L. Towards a Deeper Understanding of the Mechanisms of Interaction between Acrylamide and Key Body-Fluid Thiols. J Clin Toxicol. 2016;6(304):2161-0495.
Bergmark E, Calleman CJ, Costa LG. Formation of hemoglobin adducts of acrylamide and its epoxide metabolite glycidamide in the rat. Toxicology and applied pharmacology. 1991; 111(2):352-63.
Cambier S, Benard G, Mesmer-Dudons N, Gonzalez P, Rossignol R, Brethes D, Bourdineaud JP. At environmental doses, dietary methylmercury inhibits mitochondrial energy metabolism in skeletal muscles of the zebra fish (Danio rerio). The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology. 2009 Apr 30;41(4):791-9.
Carvalho, C.M.L., Lu, J., Zhang, X., Arnér, E.S.J., Holmgren, A. Effects of selenite and chelating agents on mammalian thioredoxin reductase inhibited by mercury: Implications for treatment of mercury poisoning (2011) FASEB Journal, 25 (1), pp. 370-381.
Cassina A, Radi R. Differential inhibitory action of nitric oxide and peroxynitrite on mitochondrial electron transport. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics. 1996 Apr 15;328(2):309-16.
Ceccatelli, S., Daré, E., Moors, M.Methylmercury-induced neurotoxicity and apoptosis (2010) Chemico-Biological Interactions, 188 (2), pp. 301-308.
Cheng JP, Yang YC, Hu WX, Yang L, Wang WH, Jia JP, Lin XY(2005) Effect of methylmercury on some neurotransmitters and oxidative damage of rats. J Environ Sci (China) 17:469-473.
Comini MA. Measurement and meaning of cellular thiol: disufhide redox status. Free radical research. 2016 Feb 1;50(2):246-71.
Eriksson, S., Svenson, A. Catalytic effects by thioltransferase on the transfer of methylmercury and p-mercuribenzoate from macromolecules to low molecular weight thiol compounds (1978) Toxicology, 10 (C), pp. 115-122.
Dreiem A, Gertz CC, Seegal RF. The effects of methylmercury on mitochondrial function and reactive oxygen species formation in rat striatal synaptosomes are age-dependent. Toxicol Sci. 2005 Sep;87(1):156-62.
Dreiem A, Seegal RF. Methylmercury-induced changes in mitochondrial function in striatal synaptosomes are calcium-dependent and ROS-independent. Neurotoxicology. 2007 Jul;28(4):720-6.
Fischer JC, Ruitenbeek W, Berden JA, Trijbels JF, Veerkamp JH, Stadhouders AM, Sengers RC, Janssen AJ. Differential investigation of the capacity of succinate oxidation in human skeletal muscle. Clinica chimica acta. 1985 Nov 29;153(1):23-36.
Flohé, L., Günzler, W.A. (1984) Assays of Glutathione Peroxidase (1984) Methods in Enzymology, 105 (C), pp. 114-120.
Fonnum, F., Lock, E.A. The contributions of excitotoxicity, glutathione depletion and DNA repair in chemically induced injury to neurones: Exemplified with toxic effects on cerebellar granule cells (2004) Journal of Neurochemistry, 88 (3), pp. 513-531.
Fonfría, E., Vilaró, M.T., Babot, Z., Rodríguez-Farré, E., Suñol, C. Mercury compounds disrupt neuronal glutamate transport in cultured mouse cerebellar granule cells (2005) Journal of Neuroscience Research, 79 (4), pp. 545-553.
Franco, J.L., Posser, T., Dunkley, P.R., Dickson, P.W., Mattos, J.J., Martins, R., Bainy, A.C.D., Marques, M.R., Dafre, A.L., Farina, M. Methylmercury neurotoxicity is associated with inhibition of the antioxidant enzyme glutathione peroxidase (2009) Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 47 (4), pp. 449-457.
Freitas, A. J., Rocha, J. B. T., Wolosker, H., & Souza, D. O. G. (1996). Effects of Hg2+ and CH3Hg+ on Ca2+ fluxes in rat brain microsomes. Brain research, 738(2), 257-264.
Friedman M. Chemistry, biochemistry, and safety of acrylamide. A review. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 2003 Jul 30;51(16):4504-26.
George, G.N., Singh, S.P., Prince, R.C., Pickering, I.J. Chemical forms of mercury and selenium in fish following digestion with simulated gastric fluid (2008) Chemical Research in Toxicology, 21 (11), pp. 2106-2110.
Glaser, V., Nazari, E.M., Müller, Y.M.R., Feksa, L., Wannmacher, C.M.D., Rocha, J.B.T., Bem, A.F.D., Farina, M., Latini, A. Effects of inorganic selenium administration in methylmercury-induced neurotoxicity in mouse cerebral cortex (2010a) International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 28 (7), pp. 631-637.
Glaser, V., Leipnitz, G., Straliotto, M.R., Oliveira, J., dos Santos, V.V., Wannmacher, C.M.D., de Bem, A.F., Rocha, J.B.T., Farina, M., Latini, A. Oxidative stress-mediated inhibition of brain creatine kinase activity by methylmercury (2010b) NeuroToxicology, 31 (5), pp. 454-460.
Holmgren and Bjornstedt (1995) Thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase. Methods Enzymol. 252: 199-208.
Hoppe, B., Bräuer, A.U., Kühbacher, M., Savaskan, N.E., Behne, D., Kyriakopoulos, A. Biochemical analysis of selenoprotein expression in brain cell lines and in distinct brain regions (2008) Cell and Tissue Research, 332 (3), pp. 403-414.
Howland RD, Vyas IL, Lowndes HE, Argentieri TM. The etiology of toxic peripheral neuropathies: in vitro effects of acrylamide and 2, 5-hexanedione on brain enolase and other glycolytic enzymes. Brain Research. 1980 Nov 24;202(1):131-42.
Hughes, B.P. (1962) A method for the estimation of serum creatine kinase and its use in comparing creatine kinase and aldolase activity in normal and pathological sera. Clinica Chimica Acta, 7, 597-603.
Isab, A.A. Estimated formation constants for the complexation of methylmercury(II) by captopril {1-[(2S)-3-mercapto-2-methyl-1-oxopropyl]-L-proline}: Evidence of stronger binding to the cis isomer of the drug (1991) Journal of the Chemical Society, Dalton Transactions, (3), pp. 449-452.
Johansson, C., Castoldi, A.F., Onishchenko, N., Manzo, L., Vahter, M., Ceccatelli, S. Neurobehavioural and molecular changes induced by methylmercury exposure during development (2007) Neurotoxicity Research, 11 (3-4), pp. 241-260.
Kopańska M, Lukáč N, Kapusta E, Formicki G. Acrylamide influence on activity of acetylcholinesterase, thiol groups, and malondialdehyde content in the brain of Swiss mice. Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology. 2015 Oct 1;29(10):472-8.
Kwon, O.-S., Park, Y.-J. In vitro and in vivo dose-dependent inhibition of methylmercury on glutamine synthetase in the brain of different species (2003) Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 14 (1-2), pp. 17-24.
Lapadula DM, Bowe M, Carrington CD, Dulak L, Friedman M, Abou-Donia MB. In vitro binding of [14C] acrylamide to neurofilament and microtubule proteins of rats. Brain research. 1989 Feb 27;481(1):157-61.
Li, Y., Shi, W., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Hu, X., Song, C., Ma, H., Wang, C., Li, Y. Neuroprotective effects of chlorogenic acid against apoptosis of PC12 cells induced by methylmercury (2008) Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 26 (1), pp. 13-21.
Limke TL, Atchison WD. Acute exposure to methylmercury opens the mitochondrial permeability transition pore in rat cerebellar granule cells. Toxicology and applied pharmacology. 2002 Jan 1;178(1):52-61.
Liu, W., Xu, Z., Deng, Y., Xu, B., Wei, Y., Yang, T. Protective effects of memantine against methylmercury-induced glutamate dyshomeostasis and oxidative stress in rat cerebral cortex (2013) Neurotoxicity Research, 24 (3), pp. 320-337.
LoPachin RM. The changing view of acrylamide neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicology. 2004 Jun 1;25(4):617-30.
LoPachin RM, Gavin T. Molecular mechanisms of aldehyde toxicity: a chemical perspective. Chemical research in toxicology. 2014 Jun 17;27(7):1081-91.
LoPachin RM, Schwarcz AI, Gaughan CL, Mansukhani S, Das S. In vivo and in vitro effects of acrylamide on synaptosomal neurotransmitter uptake and release. Neurotoxicology. 2004 Mar 1;25(3):349-63.
LoPachin RM, Gavin T, Geohagen BC, Das S. Neurotoxic mechanisms of electrophilic type-2 alkenes: soft–soft interactions described by quantum mechanical parameters. Toxicological sciences. 2007 May 22;98(2):561-70.
LoPachin RM, Gavin T, Petersen DR, Barber DS. Molecular mechanisms of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal and acrolein toxicity: nucleophilic targets and adduct formation. Chemical research in toxicology. 2009 Jul 17;22(9):1499-508.
LoPachin RM, Gavin T, DeCaprio A, Barber DS. Application of the hard and soft, acids and bases (HSAB) theory to toxicant–target interactions. Chemical research in toxicology. 2011 Nov 16;25(2):239-51.
Malagutti, K.S., da Silva, A.P., Braga, H.C., Mitozo, P.A., Soares dos Santos, A.R., Dafre, A.L., de Bem, A.F., Farina, M. 17β-estradiol decreases methylmercury-induced neurotoxicity in male mice (2009) Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 27 (2), pp. 293-297.
Martyniuk CJ, Fang B, Koomen JM, Gavin T, Zhang L, Barber DS, LoPachin RM. Molecular mechanism of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase inactivation by α, β-unsaturated carbonyl derivatives. Chemical research in toxicology. 2011 Nov 29;24(12):2302-11.
Montgomery, K.S., Mackey, J., Thuett, K., Ginestra, S., Bizon, J.L., Abbott, L.C. Chronic, low-dose prenatal exposure to methylmercury impairs motor and mnemonic function in adult C57/B6 mice (2008) Behavioural Brain Research, 191 (1), pp. 55-61.
Mori KO, Stone SC, Braverman LE, Devito WJ. Involvement of tyrosine phosphorylation in the regulation of 5'-deiodinases in FRTL-5 rat thyroid cells and rat astrocytes. Endocrinology. 1996 Apr 1;137(4):1313-8.
Mori, K., Yoshida, K., Nakagawa, Y., Hoshikawa, S., Ozaki, H., Ito, S., Watanabe, C. Methylmercury inhibition of type II 5′-deiodinase activity resulting in a decrease in growth hormone production in GH3 cells (2007) Toxicology, 237 (1-3), pp. 203-209.
Mori, K., Yoshida, K., Tani, J.-I., Hoshikawa, S., Ito, S., Watanabe, C. Methylmercury inhibits type II 5′-deiodinase activity in NB41A3 neuroblastoma cells (2006) Toxicology Letters, 161 (2), pp. 96-101.
Mori N, Yasutake A, Hirayama K. Comparative study of activities in reactive oxygen species production/defense system in mitochondria of rat brain and liver, and their susceptibility to methylmercury toxicity. Archives of toxicology. 2007 Nov 1;81(11):769-76.
Mori, N., Yasutake, A., Marumoto, M. and Hirayama, K., 2011. Methylmercury inhibits electron transport chain activity and induces cytochrome c release in cerebellum mitochondria. The Journal of toxicological sciences, 36(3), pp.253-259.
Ni, M., Li, X., Yin, Z., Sidoryk-Weogonekgrzynowicz, M., Jiang, H., Farina, M., Rocha, J.B.T., Syversen, T., Aschner, M. Comparative study on the response of rat primary astrocytes and microglia to methylmercury toxicity (2011) GLIA, 59 (5), pp. 810-820.
Ni, M., Li, X., Yin, Z., Jiang, H., Sidoryk-Wegrzynowicz, M., Milatovic, D., Cai, J., Aschner, M. Methylmercury induces acute oxidative stress, altering Nrf2 protein level in primary microglial cells (2010) Toxicological Sciences, 116 (2), pp. 590-603.
O'Kusky, J., 1983. Methylmercury poisoning of the developing nervous system: morphological changes in neuronal mitochondria. Acta neuropathologica, 61(2), pp.116-122.
Patel AJ, Hunt A, Gordon RD, Balazs R: The activities in different neural cell types of certain enzymes associated with the metabolic compartmentation glutamate. Brain research 1982, 256:3-11.
Pishak MR, Phillips AT: A modified radioisotopic assay for measuring glutamine synthetase activity in tissue extracts. Analytical biochemistry 1979, 94:82-88.
Polunas, M., Halladay, A., Tjalkens, R.B., Philbert, M.A., Lowndes, H. and Reuhl, K., 2011. Role of oxidative stress and the mitochondrial permeability transition in methylmercury cytotoxicity. Neurotoxicology, 32(5), pp.526-534.
Rabenstein, D.L. The Aqueous Solution Chemistry of Methylmercury and Its Complexes (1978b) Accounts of Chemical Research, 11 (3), pp. 100-107.
Rabenstein, D.L., Arnold, A.P., Guy, R.D. 1H-NMR study of the removal of methylmercury from intact erythrocytes by sulfhydryl compounds (1986) Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 28 (2-3), pp. 279-287.
Rabenstein, D.L., Bravo, J. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of the Solution Chemistry of Metal Complexes: 24: Arylmercury(II) Complexes of Sulfhydryl-Containing Ligands (1987) Inorganic Chemistry, 26 (17), pp. 2784-2787.
Rabenstein, D.L., Evans, C.A. The mobility of methylmercury in biological systems (1978) Bioinorganic Chemistry, 8 (2), pp. 107-114.
Rabenstein, D.L., Fairhurst, M.T. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of the Solution Chemistry of Metal Complexes. XI. Binding of Methylmercury by Sulfhydryl-Containing Amino Acids and by Glutathione (1975) Journal of the American Chemical Society, 97 (8), pp. 2086-2092.
Rabenstein, D.L., Reid, R.S. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of the Solution Chemistry of Metal Complexes. 20. Ligand-Exchange Kinetics of Methylmercury(II)-Thiol Complexes (1984) Inorganic Chemistry, 23 (9), pp. 1246-1250.
Rabenstein, D.L., Reid, R.S., Isab, A.A. 1H nmr study of the effectiveness of various thiols for removal of methylmercury from hemolyzed erythrocytes (1983) Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 18 (3), pp. 241-251.
Reid, R.S., Rabenstein, D.L. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of the Solution Chemistry of Metal Complexes. 19. Formation Constants for the Complexation of Methylmercury by Glutathione, Ergothioneine, and Hemoglobin (1982) Journal of the American Chemical Society, 104 (24), pp. 6733-6737.
Roos, D., Seeger, R., Puntel, R., Vargas Barbosa, N. Role of calcium and mitochondria in MeHg-mediated cytotoxicity (2012) Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, 2012, art. no. 248764,
Rowe, W..B., Ronzio, R.A., Wellner, V.P., Meister, A. (1970) Glutamine synthetase (sheep brain).Meth ods in Enzymology,17, Part A, 900-910.
Rustin, P., Chretien, D., Bourgeron, T., Gerard, B., Rötig, A., Saudubray, J. M., & Munnich, A. (1994). Biochemical and molecular investigations in respiratory chain deficiencies. Clinica chimica acta, 228(1), 35-51.
Shenker BJ, Guo TL, Shapiro IM. Low-level methylmercury exposure causes human T-cells to undergo apoptosis: evidence of mitochondrial dysfunction. Environmental research. 1998 May 31;77(2):149-59.
Shenker BJ, Guo TL, Insug O, Shapiro IM. Induction of apoptosis in human T-cells by methyl mercury: temporal relationship between mitochondrial dysfunction and loss of reductive reserve. Toxicology and applied pharmacology. 1999 May 15;157(1):23-35.
Sorg, O., Schilter, B., Honegger, P., Monnet-Tschudi, F.Increased vulnerability of neurones and glial cells to low concentrations of methylmercury in a prooxidant situation (1998) Acta Neuropathologica, 96 (6), pp. 621-627.
Stringari, J., Nunes, A.K.C., Franco, J.L., Bohrer, D., Garcia, S.C., Dafre, A.L., Milatovic, D., Souza, D.O., Rocha, J.B.T., Aschner, M., Farina, M. Prenatal methylmercury exposure hampers glutathione antioxidant system ontogenesis and causes long-lasting oxidative stress in the mouse brain (2008) Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 227 (1), pp. 147-154.
Tong GC, Cornwell WK, Means GE. Reactions of acrylamide with glutathione and serum albumin. Toxicology letters. 2004 Mar 1;147(2):127-31.
Wagner, C., Sudati, J.H., Nogueira, C.W., Rocha, J.B.T. In vivo and in vitro inhibition of mice thioredoxin reductase by methylmercury (2010) BioMetals, 23 (6), pp. 1171-1177.
Wormser, U., Brodsky, B., Milatovic, D., Finkelstein, Y., Farina, M., Rocha, J.B., Aschner, M. Protective effect of a novel peptide against methylmercury-induced toxicity in rat primary astrocytes (2012) NeuroToxicology, 33 (4), pp. 763-768.
Yin, Z., Milatovic, D., Aschner, J.L., Syversen, T., Rocha, J.B.T., Souza, D.O., Sidoryk, M., Albrecht, J., Aschner, M. Methylmercury induces oxidative injury, alterations in permeability and glutamine transport in cultured astrocytes (2007) Brain Research, 1131 (1), pp. 1-10.
Yousef MI, El-Demerdash FM. Acrylamide-induced oxidative stress and biochemical perturbations in rats. Toxicology. 2006 Feb 15;219(1-3):133-41.
Zemolin, A.P.P., Meinerz, D.F., de Paula, M.T., Mariano, D.O.C., Rocha, J.B.T., Pereira, A.B., Posser, T., Franco, J.L. Evidences for a role of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPx4) in Methylmercury induced neurotoxicity in vivo (2012) Toxicology, 302 (1), pp. 60-67.
Zhu, S.-Y., Li, X.-N., Sun, X.-C., Lin, J., Li, W., Zhang, C., Li, J.-L. Biochemical characterization of the selenoproteome in Gallus gallus via bioinformatics analysis: structure-function relationships and interactions of binding molecules (2017) Metallomics, 9 (2), pp. 124-131.
List of Key Events in the AOP
Event: 1392: Oxidative Stress
Short Name: Oxidative Stress
AOPs Including This Key Event
Biological Context
| Level of Biological Organization |
|---|
| Molecular |
Domain of Applicability
Oxidative stress is produced in, and can occur in, any species from bacteria through to humans.
Key Event Description
Oxidative stress is defined as an imbalance in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidant defenses. High levels of oxidizing free radicals can be very damaging to cells and molecules within the cell. As a result, the cell has important defense mechanisms to protect itself from ROS. For example, Nrf2 is a transcription factor and master regulator of the oxidative stress response. During periods of oxidative stress, Nrf2-dependent changes in gene expression are important in regaining cellular homeostasis (Nguyen, et al. 2009) and can be used as indicators of the presence of oxidative stress in the cell.
In addition to the directly damaging actions of ROS, cellular oxidative stress also changes cellular activities on a molecular level. Redox sensitive proteins have altered physiology in the presence and absence of ROS, which is caused by the oxidation of sulfhydryls to disulfides (2SH àSS) on neighboring amino acids (Antelmann and Helmann 2011). Importantly Keap1, the negative regulator of Nrf2, is regulated in this manner (Itoh, et al. 2010).
How it is Measured or Detected
Oxidative Stress. Direct measurement of ROS is difficult because ROS are unstable. The presence of ROS can be assayed indirectly by measurement of cellular antioxidants, or by ROS-dependent cellular damage:
- Glutathione (GSH) depletion. GSH can be measured by assaying the ratio of reduced to oxidized glutathione (GSH:GSSG) using a commercially available kit (e.g., http://www.abcam.com/gshgssg-ratio-detection-assay-kit-fluorometric-green-ab138881.html).
- TBARS. Oxidative damage to lipids can be measured by assaying for lipid peroxidation using TBARS (thiobarbituric acid reactive substances) using a commercially available kit.
- 8-oxo-dG. Oxidative damage to nucleic acids can be assayed by measuring 8-oxo-dG adducts (for which there are a number of ELISA based commercially available kits),or HPLC, described in Chepelev et al. (Chepelev, et al. 2015).
Molecular Biology: Nrf2. Nrf2’s transcriptional activity is controlled post-translationally by oxidation of Keap1. Assay for Nrf2 activity include:
- Immunohistochemistry for increases in Nrf2 protein levels and translocation into the nucleus;
- Western blot for increased Nrf2 protein levels;
- Western blot of cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions to observe translocation of Nrf2 protein from the cytoplasm to the nucleus;
- qPCR of Nrf2 target genes (e.g., Nqo1, Hmox-1, Gcl, Gst, Prx, TrxR, Srxn), or by commercially available pathway-based qPCR array (e.g., oxidative stress array from SABiosciences)
- Whole transcriptome profiling by microarray or RNA-seq followed by pathway analysis (in IPA, DAVID, metacore, etc.) for enrichment of the Nrf2 oxidative stress response pathway (e.g., Jackson et al. 2014).
References
Antelmann, H., Helmann, J.D., 2011. Thiol-based redox switches and gene regulation. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 14, 1049-1063.
Chepelev, N.L., Kennedy, D.A., Gagne, R., White, T., Long, A.S., Yauk, C.L., White, P.A., 2015. HPLC Measurement of the DNA Oxidation Biomarker, 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine, in Cultured Cells and Animal Tissues. J. Vis. Exp. (102):e52697. doi, e52697.
Itoh, K., Mimura, J., Yamamoto, M., 2010. Discovery of the negative regulator of Nrf2, Keap1: a historical overview. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 13, 1665-1678.
Nguyen, T., Nioi, P., Pickett, C.B., 2009. The Nrf2-antioxidant response element signaling pathway and its activation by oxidative stress. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 13291-13295.
Event: 1488: Glutamate dyshomeostasis
Short Name: Glutamate dyshomeostasis
AOPs Including This Key Event
Biological Context
| Level of Biological Organization |
|---|
| Cellular |
Cell term
| Cell term |
|---|
| neural cell |
Organ term
| Organ term |
|---|
| brain |
Key Event Description
Glutamate (Glu) is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system (CNS), where it plays major roles in multiple aspects, such as development, learning, memory and response to injury (Featherstone, 2010). However, it is well recognized that Glu at high concentrations at the synaptic cleft acts as a toxin, inducing neuronal injury and death (Meldrum, 2000; Ozawa et al., 1998) secondary to activation of glumatergic N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors and Ca2+ influx. Glu dyshomeostasis is a consequence of perturbation of astrocyte/neuron interactions and the transport of this amino acid, as will be discussed below.
Astrocytes are critically involved in neuronal function and survival, as they produce neurotrophic factors, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and glia-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), as well as express two main glutamate transporters responsible for the removal of excessive Glu from the synaptic clefts (Chai et al., 2013; Sheldon et al., 2007). Glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the CNS, playing a major role in memory and cognitive function (Platt, 1997), and Glu transporters as such prevent the overstimulation of post-synaptic glutamate receptors that lead to excitotoxic neuronal injury (Sattler et al., 2001; Dobble, 1999). Among the five subtypes of Glu transporters identified, glutamate aspartate transporter (GLAST) and Glu transporter-1 (GLT-1) [excitatory amino acid transporter (EAAT) 1 and 2 in humans, respectively], are predominantly expressed in astrocytes. They are responsible for the uptake of excess glutamate from the extracellular space (Furuta et al., 1997; Lehre et al., 1995; Tanaka, 2000), supported by the fact that knockdown of either GLT-1 or GLAST in mice increases extracellular glutamate levels, leading to excitotoxicity related neurodegeneration and progressive paralysis (Bristol and Rothstein, 1996). In the adult brain, EAAT2 accounts for >90% of extracellular glutamate clearance (Danbolt, 2001; Kim et al., 2011; Rothstein et al., 1995), and genetic deletion of both alleles of GLT-1 in mice leads to the development of lethal seizures (Rothstein et al., 1996). On the other hand, EAAT1-3 play a major role during human brain development, in particular in corticogenesis, where they are expressed in proliferative zones and in radial glia, and alterations of Glu transporters contributes to disorganized cortex seen in migration disorders (Furuta et al., 2005;Regan et al., 2007). Indeed, disruption of glutamate signaling is thought to be part of the etiology underlying some neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism and schizophrenia (Chiocchetti et al., 2014; Schwartz et al., 2012). Genetic variants associated with autism spectrum disorders were enriched in glutamatergic pathways, affecting receptor signalling, metabolism and transport (Chiocchetti et al, 2014).
Extracellular Glu released by neurons is taken up by astrocytes, which is converted into glutamine (Gln) by glutamine synthetase (GS), a thiol-containing enzyme (cf MIE, Binding to SH-/seleno containing proteins). Intercellular compartmentation of Gln and Glu, the so-called Gln/Glu-GABA cycle (GGC), is critical for optimal CNS function.13C NMR studies have demonstrated that the ratio of Gln/Glu is extremely high and increases with brain activity (Shen et al., 1999). Thus the GGC gives rise to the amino acid neurotransmitters Glu and GABA via dynamic astrocyte neuron interactions. Glu released at synaptic terminals is taken up by surrounding astrocytes via GLT-1 and GLAST (Rothstein et al., 1994; 1996). A small proportion of the astrocytic formed Gln via a reaction mediated by GS is transported into the extracellular space by Gln carriers, with a predominant role for System N/A transporter (SNAT3), which belongs to the bidirectional transporter System N (Chaudhry et al., 2002).
In addition to System N, release of Gln from astrocytes is mediated by other transport systems, including Systems L (LAT2) and ASC (ASCT2). Extracellular Gln is taken up into GABAergic and Glu-ergic neurons by the unidirectional System A transporters SNAT1 (Melone et al., 2004) and SNAT2 (Grewal et al., 2009). Once in neurons, Gln is converted to Glu by the mitochondrial enzyme phosphate-activated glutaminase (Kvamme et al., 2001). Additionally, Glu is packaged into synaptic vesicles by the vesicular VGLUT transporter (Bellocchio et al., 1998), released into the extracellular space and taken up by astrocytes where it is converted back to Gln by GS, thus completing the GGC (Fig. 1).

Figure 1: Schematic representation of Glu and Gln transport systems related to the GGC. From Sidorik-Wegrzynowicz and Aschner, 2013)
How it is Measured or Detected
- The glutamate uptake activity via EAAT1 can be determined in the presence of dihydrokainic acid (DHK), a specific inhibitor for GLT-1, as described in Mutkus et al. (2005).
- For measuring glutamate release, load 3H glutamate for several hours and then look at release over time, as descibed in (Arizza et al., 1994)
- Glutamate Assay Kit from Abcam (ab83389) provides a sensitive detection method of the glutamate in a variety of samples. This kit will only measure free glutamate levels but not glutamic acid found in the backbone of peptides or proteins. The glutamate Enzyme Mix recognizes glutamate as a specific substrate leading to proportional color development.The amount of glutamate can therefore be easily quantified by colorimetric spectrophotometry at OD = 450 nm.
References
Arriza JL, Fairman WA, Wadiche JI, Murdoch GH, Kavanaugh MP, Amara SG (1994) Functional comparisons of three glutamate transporter subtypes cloned from human motor cortex. J Neurosci 14(9):5559–5569.
Bellocchio EE, Hu H, Pohorille A, Chan J, Pickel VM, Edwards RH. The localization of the brain-specific inorganic phosphate transporter suggests a specific presynaptic role in glutamatergic transmission. J Neurosci. 1998;18:8648–59.
Bristol LA, Rothstein JD. Glutamate transporter gene expression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis motor cortex. Annals of neurology. 1996;39:676–679.
Chai L, Guo H, Li H, Wang S, Wang YL, Shi F, Hu LM, Liu Y, Adah D. Scutellarin and caffeic acid ester fraction, active components of Dengzhanxixin injection, upregulate neurotrophins synthesis and release in hypoxia/reoxygenation rat astrocytes. Journal of ethnopharmacology. 2013;150:100–107.
Chaudhry FA, Reimer RJ, Edwards RH. The glutamine commute: take the N line and transfer to the A. J Cell Biol. 2002;157:349–55.
Chiocchetti, A. G., H. S. Bour and C. M. Freitag (2014). "Glutamatergic candidate genes in autism spectrum disorder: an overview." J Neural Transm (Vienna) 121(9): 1081-1106.
Danbolt NC. Glutamate uptake. Progress in neurobiology. 2001;65:1–105.
Doble A. The role of excitotoxicity in neurodegenerative disease: implications for therapy. Pharmacology & therapeutics. 1999;81:163–221.
Featherstone, D. E. (2010). "Intercellular glutamate signaling in the nervous system and beyond." ACS Chem Neurosci 1(1): 4-12.
Furuta A, Rothstein JD, Martin LJ. Glutamate transporter protein subtypes are expressed differentially during rat CNS development. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 1997;17:8363–8375.
Furuta, A., S. Takashima, H. Yokoo, J. D. Rothstein, K. Wada and T. Iwaki (2005). "Expression of glutamate transporter subtypes during normal human corticogenesis and type II lissencephaly." Brain Res Dev Brain Res 155(2): 155-164.
Grewal S, Defamie N, Zhang X, et al. SNAT2 amino acid transporter is regulated by amino acids of the SLC6 gamma-aminobutyric acid transporter subfamily in neocortical neurons and may play no role in delivering glutamine for glutamatergic transmission. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:11224–36.
Kim K, Lee SG, Kegelman TP, Su ZZ, Das SK, Dash R, Dasgupta S, Barral PM, Hedvat M, Diaz P, Reed JC, Stebbins JL, Pellecchia M, Sarkar D, Fisher PB. Role of excitatory amino acid transporter-2 (EAAT2) and glutamate in neurodegeneration: opportunities for developing novel therapeutics. Journal of cellular physiology. 2011;226:2484–2493.
Kvamme E, Torgner IA, Roberg B. Kinetics and localization of brain phosphate activated glutaminase. J Neurosci Res. 2001;66:951–8.
Lehre KP, Levy LM, Ottersen OP, Storm-Mathisen J, Danbolt NC. Differential expression of two glial glutamate transporters in the rat brain: quantitative and immunocytochemical observations. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 1995;15:1835–1853.
Meldrum, B. S. (2000). "Glutamate as a neurotransmitter in the brain: review of physiology and pathology." J Nutr 130(4S Suppl): 1007S-1015S.
Melone M, Quagliano F, Barbaresi P, Varoqui H, Erickson JD, Conti F. Localization of the glutamine transporter SNAT1 in rat cerebral cortex and neighboring structures, with a note on its localization in human cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14:562–74.
Mutkus, L., J. L. Aschner, T. Syversen and M. Aschner (2005). "Methylmercury alters the in vitro uptake of glutamate in GLAST- and GLT-1-transfected mutant CHO-K1 cells." Biol Trace Elem Res 107(3): 231-245.
Ozawa, S., H. Kamiya and K. Tsuzuki (1998). "Glutamate receptors in the mammalian central nervous system." Prog Neurobiol 54(5): 581-618.
Platt SR. The role of glutamate in central nervous system health and disease--a review. Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997) 2007;173:278–286.
Regan MR, Huang YH, Kim YS, Dykes-Hoberg MI, Jin L, Watkins AM, Bergles DE, Rothstein JD. Variations in promoter activity reveal a differential expression and physiology of glutamate transporters by glia in the developing and mature CNS. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2007;27:6607–6619.
Rothstein JD, Martin L, Levey AI, et al. Localization of neuronal and glial glutamate transporters. Neuron. 1994;13:713–25.
Rothstein JD, Van Kammen M, Levey AI, Martin LJ, Kuncl RW. Selective loss of glial glutamate transporter GLT-1 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Annals of neurology. 1995;38:73–84.
Rothstein JD, Dykes-Hoberg M, Pardo CA, Bristol LA, Jin L, Kuncl RW, Kanai Y, Hediger MA, Wang Y, Schielke JP, Welty DF. Knockout of glutamate transporters reveals a major role for astroglial transport in excitotoxicity and clearance of glutamate. Neuron. 1996;16:675–686.
Sattler R, Tymianski M. Molecular mechanisms of glutamate receptor-mediated excitotoxic neuronal cell death. Molecular neurobiology. 2001;24:107–129.
Schwartz, C. E. and G. Neri (2012). "Autism and intellectual disability: two sides of the same coin." Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 160C(2): 89-90.
Sheldon AL, Robinson MB. The role of glutamate transporters in neurodegenerative diseases and potential opportunities for intervention. Neurochemistry international. 2007;51:333–355.
Shen J, Petersen KF, Behar KL, et al. Determination of the rate of the glutamate/glutamine cycle in the human brain by in vivo 13C NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:8235–40.
Sidoryk-Wegrzynowicz M1, Aschner M. Manganese toxicity in the central nervous system: the glutamine/glutamate-γ-aminobutyric acid cycle. J Intern Med. 2013 May;273(5):466-77. doi: 10.1111/joim.12040.
Tanaka K. Functions of glutamate transporters in the brain. Neuroscience research. 2000;37:15–19.
Event: 55: N/A, Cell injury/death
Short Name: N/A, Cell injury/death
Key Event Component
| Process | Object | Action |
|---|---|---|
| cell death | increased |
AOPs Including This Key Event
Biological Context
| Level of Biological Organization |
|---|
| Cellular |
Cell term
| Cell term |
|---|
| eukaryotic cell |
Domain of Applicability
Cell death is an universal event occurring in cells of any species. [11]
Key Event Description
Two types of cell death can be distinguished by morphological features, although it is likely that these are two ends of a spectrum with possible intermediate forms. Apoptosis involves shrinkage, nuclear disassembly, and fragmentation of the cell into discrete bodies with intact plasma membranes. These are rapidly phagocytosed by neighbouring cells. An important feature of apoptosis is the requirement for adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to initiate the execution phase. In contrast, necrotic cell death is characterized by cell swelling and lysis. This is usually a consequence of profound loss of mitochondrial function and resultant ATP depletion, leading to loss of ion homeostasis, including volume regulation, and increased Ca2+. The latter activates a number of nonspecific hydrolases (i.e., proteases, nucleases, and phospholipases) as well as calcium dependent kinases. Activation of calpain I, the Ca2+-dependent cysteine protease cleaves the death-promoting Bcl-2 family members Bid and Bax which translocate to mitochondrial membranes, resulting in release of truncated apoptosis-inducing factor (tAIF), cytochrome c and endonuclease in the case of Bid and cytocrome c in the case of Bax. tAIF translocates to cell nuclei, and together with cyclophilin A and phosphorylated histone H2AX (γH2AX) is responsible for DNA cleavage, a feature of programmed necrosis. Activated calpain I has also been shown to cleave the plasma membrane Na+–Ca2+ exchanger, which leads to build-up of intracellular Ca2+, which is the source of additional increased intracellular Ca2+. Cytochrome c in cellular apoptosis is a component of the apoptosome.
DNA damage activates nuclear poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1(PARP-1), a DNA repair enzyme. PARP-1 forms poly(ADP-ribose) polymers, to repair DNA, but when DNA damage is extensive, PAR accumulates, exits cell nuclei and travels to mitochondrial membranes, where it, like calpain I, is involved in AIF release from mitochondria. A fundamental distinction between necrosis and apoptosis is the loss of plasma membrane integrity; this is integral to the former but not the latter. As a consequence, lytic release of cellular constituents promotes a local inflammatory reaction, whereas the rapid removal of apoptotic bodies minimizes such a reaction. The distinction between the two modes of death is easily accomplished in vitro but not in vivo. Thus, although claims that certain drugs induce apoptosis have been made, these are relatively unconvincing. DNA fragmentation can occur in necrosis, leading to positive TUNEL staining. Conversely, when apoptosis is massive, it can exceed the capacity for rapid phagocytosis, resulting in the eventual appearance of secondary necrosis.
Two alternative pathways - either extrinsic (receptor-mediated) or intrinsic (mitochondria-mediated) - lead to apoptotic cell death. The initiation of cell death begins either at the plasma membrane with the binding of TNF or FasL to their cognate receptors or within the cell. The latter is due to the occurrence of intracellular stress in the form of biochemical events such as oxidative stress, redox changes, covalent binding, lipid peroxidation, and consequent functional effects on mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, microtubules, cytoskeleton, or DNA. The intrinsic mitochondrial pathway involves the initiator, caspase-9, which, when activated, forms an “apoptosome” in the cytosol, together with cytochrome c, which translocates from mitochondria, Apaf-1 and dATP. The apoptosome activates caspase-3, the central effector caspase, which in turn activates downstream factors that are responsible for the apoptotic death of a cell [1]. Intracellular stress either directly affects mitochondria or can lead to effects on other organelles, which then send signals to the mitochondria to recruit participation in the death process [1][2]Constitutively expressed nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) is a Ca2+-dependent cytosolic enzyme that forms nitric oxide (NO) from L-arginine, and NO reacts with the free radical such as superoxide (O2−) to form the very toxic free radical peroxynitrite (ONOO−). Free radicals such as ONOO−, O2 − and hydroxyl radical (OH−) damage cellular membranes and intracellular proteins, enzymes and DNA [1], [2] [3][4]
How it is Measured or Detected
Necrosis:
LDH is a soluble cytoplasmic enzyme that is present in almost all cells and is released into extracellular space when the plasma membrane is damaged. To detect the leakage of LDH into cell culture medium, a tetrazolium salt is used in this assay. In the first step, LDH produces reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) when it catalyzes the oxidation of lactate to pyruvate. In the second step, a tetrazolium salt is converted to a colored formazan product using newly synthesized NADH in the presence of an electron acceptor. The amount of formazan product can be colorimetrically quantified by standard spectroscopy. Because of the linearity of the assay, it can be used to enumerate the percentage of necrotic cells in a sample. [5]
The MTT assay is a colorimetric assay for assessing cell viability. NAD(P)H-dependent cellular oxidoreductase enzymes may reflect the number of viable cells present. These enzymes are capable of reducing the tetrazolium dye MTT 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide to its insoluble formazan, which has a purple color. Other closely related tetrazolium dyes including XTT, MTS and the WSTs. Tetrazolium dye assays can also be used to measure cytotoxicity (loss of viable cells) or cytostatic activity (shift from proliferation to quiescence) of potential medicinal agents and toxic materials. MTT assays are usually done in the dark since the MTT reagent is sensitive to light [6].
Propidium iodide (PI) is an intercalating agent and a fluorescent molecule used to stain necrotic cells. It is cell membrane impermeant so it stains only those cells where the cell membrane is destroyed. When PI is bound to nucleic acids, the fluorescence excitation maximum is 535 nm and the emission maximum is 617 nm [7] .
Alamar Blue (resazurin) fluorescent dye. The oxidized blue non fluorescent Alamar blue is reduced to a pink fluorescent dye in the medium by cell activity (O'Brien et al., 2000) (12).
Neutral red uptake, which is based on the ability of viable cells to incorporate and bind the supravital dye neutral red in lysosomes (Repetto et al., 2008)(13).
ATP assay: Quantification of ATP, signaling the presence of metabolically active cells (CellTiter-Glo; Promega).
Apoptosis:
TUNEL is a common method for detecting DNA fragmentation that results from apoptotic signalling cascades. The assay relies on the presence of nicks in the DNA which can be identified by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase or TdT, an enzyme that will catalyze the addition of dUTPs that are secondarily labeled with a marker. It may also label cells that have suffered severe DNA damage.
Caspase activity assays measured by fluorescence. During apoptosis, mainly caspase-3 and -7 cleave PARP to yield an 85 kDa and a 25 kDa fragment. PARP cleavage is considered to be one of the classical characteristics of apoptosis. Antibodies to the 85 kDa fragment of cleaved PARP or to caspase-3 both serve as markers for apoptotic cells that can be monitored using immunofluorescence [8].
Hoechst 33342 staining: Hoechst dyes are cell-permeable and bind to DNA in live or fixed cells. Therefore, these stains are often called supravital, which means that cells survive a treatment with these compounds. The stained, condensed or fragmented DNA is a marker of apoptosis. [9] [10]
Acridine Orange/Ethidium Bromide staining is used to visualize nuclear changes and apoptotic body formation that are characteristic of apoptosis. Cells are viewed under a fluorescence microscope and counted to quantify apoptosis.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Fujikawa, D.G. (2015), The role of excitotoxic programmed necrosis in acute brain injury, Comput Struct Biotechnol J, vol. 13, pp. 212-221.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Malhi, H. et al. (2010), Hepatocyte death: a clear and present danger, Physiol Rev, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 1165-1194.
- ↑ Kaplowitz, N. (2002), Biochemical and Cellular Mechanisms of Toxic Liver Injury, Semin Liver Dis, vol. 22, no. 2, http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/433631 (accessed on 20 January 2016).
- ↑ Kroemer, G. et al., (2009), Classification of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death, Cell Death Differ, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 3-11.
- ↑ Chan, F.K., K. Moriwaki and M.J. De Rosa (2013), Detection of necrosis by release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity, Methods Mol Biol, vol. 979, pp. 65–70.
- ↑ Berridge, M.V., P.M. Herst and A.S. Tan (2005), Tetrazolium dyes as tools in cell biology: new insights into their cellular reduction. Biotechnology Annual Review, vol. 11, pp 127-152.
- ↑ Moore, A, et al.(1998), Simultaneous measurement of cell cycle and apoptotic cell death,Methods Cell Biol, vol. 57, pp. 265–278.
- ↑ Li, Peng et al. (2004), Mitochondrial activation of apoptosis, Cell, vol. 116, no. 2 Suppl,pp. S57-59, 2 p following S59.
- ↑ Loo, D.T. (2002), TUNEL Assay an overview of techniques, Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 203: In Situ Detection of DNA Damage, chapter 2, Didenko VV (ed.), Humana Press Inc.
- ↑ Kubbies, M. and P.S. Rabinovitch (1983), Flow cytometric analysis of factors which influence the BrdUrd-Hoechst quenching effect in cultivated human fibroblasts and lymphocytes, Cytometry, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 276–281.
- ↑ Fink, S.L. and B.T. Cookson (2005), Apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necrosis: mechanistic description of dead and dying eukaryotic cells, Infect Immun, vol. 73, no. 4, pp.1907-1916.
- O'Brien J, Wilson I, Orton T, Pognan F. 2000. Investigation of the Alamar Blue (resazurin) fluorescent dye for the assessment of mammalian cell cytotoxicity. European journal of biochemistry / FEBS 267(17): 5421-5426.
- Repetto G, del Peso A, Zurita JL. 2008. Neutral red uptake assay for the estimation of cell viability/cytotoxicity. Nature protocols 3(7): 1125-1131.
Event: 188: N/A, Neuroinflammation
Short Name: N/A, Neuroinflammation
Key Event Component
| Process | Object | Action |
|---|---|---|
| brain inflammation | microglial cell | pathological |
| brain inflammation | astrocyte | pathological |
AOPs Including This Key Event
Biological Context
| Level of Biological Organization |
|---|
| Tissue |
Organ term
| Organ term |
|---|
| brain |
Domain of Applicability
| Life Stage | Evidence |
|---|---|
| During brain development, adulthood and aging | High |
| Sex | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Unspecific | High |
Neuroinflammation is observed in human, monkey, rat, mouse, and zebrafish, in association with neurodegeneration or following toxicant exposure. Some references (non-exhaustive list) are given below for illustration:
In human: Vennetti et al., 2006
In monkey (Macaca fascicularis): Charleston et al., 1994, 1996
Iin rat: Little et al., 2012; Zurich et al., 2002; Eskes et al., 2002
In mouse: Liu et al., 2012
In zebrafish: Xu et al., 2014.
Key Event Description
Neuroinflammation or brain inflammation differs from peripheral inflammation in that the vascular response and the role of peripheral bone marrow-derived cells are less conspicuous. The most easily detectable feature of neuroinflammation is activation of microglial cells and astrocytes. It is evidenced by changes in shape, increased expression of certain antigens, and accumulation and proliferation of the glial cells in affected regions (Aschner, 1998; Graeber & Streit, 1990; Monnet-Tschudi et al, 2007; Streit et al, 1999; Kraft and Harry, 2011; Claycomb et al., 2013). Upon stimulation by cytokines or inflammogens (e.g. from pathogens or from damaged neurons), both glial cell types activate inflammatory signalling pathways, which result in increased expression and/or release of inflammatory mediators such as cytokines, eicosanoids, and metalloproteinases (Dong & Benveniste, 2001), as well as in the production of reactive oxygen (ROS) and nitrogen species (RNS) (Brown & Bal-Price, 2003). Different types of activation states are possible for microglia and astrocytes, resulting in pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory signalling and other cellular functions (such as phagocytosis) (Streit et al., 1999; Nakajima and Kohsaka, 2004).
Therefore, neuroinflammation can have both neuroprotective/neuroreparative and neurodegenerative consequences (Carson et al., 2006 ; Monnet-Tschudi et al, 2007; Aguzzi et al., 2013 ; Glass et al., 2010). Under normal physiological conditions, microglial cells scan the nervous system for neuronal integrity (Nimmerjahn et al, 2005) and for invading pathogens (Aloisi, 2001; Kreutzberg, 1995; Kreutzberg, 1996; Rivest, 2009). They are the first type of cell activated (first line of defence), and can subsequently induce astrocyte activation (Falsig, 2008). Two distinct states of microglial activation have been described (Gordon, 2003; Kigerl et al, 2009; Maresz et al, 2008; Mosser & Edwards, 2008; Perego et al; Ponomarev et al, 2005): The M1 state is classically triggered by interferon-gamma and/or other pro-inflammatory cytokines, and this state is characterized by increased expression of integrin alpha M (Itgam) and CD86, as well as the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, IL-6), and it is mostly associated with neurodegeneration. The M2 state is triggered by IL-4 and IL-13 (Maresz et al, 2008; Perego et al, 2011; Ponomarev et al, 2007) and induces the expression of mannose receptor 1 (MRC1), arginase1 (Arg 1) and Ym1/2; it is involved in repair processes. The activation of astrocytes by microglia-derived cytokines or TLR agonists resembles the microglial M1 state (Falsig 2006). Although classification of the M1/M2 polarization of microglial cells may be considered as a simplification of authentic microglial reaction states (Ransohoff, 2016), a similar polarization of reactive astrocytes has been descibed recently Liddlelow et al., 2017): Interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1Þ), TNF and subcomponent q (C1q) released by activated microglial cells induce A1-reactive astrocytes, which lose the ability to promote neuronal survival, outgrowth, synaptogenesis and phagocytosis and induce the death of neurons and oligodendrocytes.
How it is Measured or Detected
Neuroinflammation, i.e. the activation of glial cells can be measured by quantification of cellular markers (most commonly), or of released mediators (less common). As multiple activation states exist for the two main cell types involved, it is necessary to measure several markers of neuroinflammation:
- Microglial activation can be detected based on the increased numbers of labeled microglia per volume element of brain tissue (due to increase of binding sites, proliferation, and immigration of cells) or on morphological changes. A specific microglial marker, used across different species, is CD11b. Alternatively various specific carbohydrate structures can be stained by lectins (e.g. IB4). Beyond that, various well-established antibodies are available to detect microglia in mouse tissue (F4/80), phagocytic microglia in rat tissue (ED1) or more generally microglia across species (Iba1). Transgenic mice are available with fluorescent proteins under the control of the CD11b promoter to easily quantify microglia without the need for specific stains.
- The most frequently used astrocyte marker is GFAP (99% of all studies) (Eng et al., 2000). This protein is highly specific for astrocytes in the brain, and antibodies are available for immunocytochemical detection. In neuroinflamatory brain regions, the stain becomes more prominent, due to an upregulation of the protein, a shape change/proliferation of the cells, and/or better accessibility of the antibody. Various histological quantification approaches can be used. Occasionally, alternative astrocytic markers, such as vimentin of the S100beta protein, have been used for staining of astrocytes (Struzynska et al., 2007). Antibodies for complement component 3 (C3), the most characteristic and highly upregulated marker of A1 neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are commercially available.
- All immunocytochemical methods can also be applied to cell culture models.
- In patients, microglial accumulation can be monitored by PET imaging, using [11C]-PK 11195 as a microglial marker (Banati et al., 2002).
- Activation of glial cells can be assessed in tissue or cell culture models also by quantification of sets of activation markers. This can for instance be done by PCR quantification of inflammatory factors, by measurement of the respective mediators, e.g. by ELISA-related immuno-quantification. Such markers include:
- Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine expression (IL-1β; TNF-α, Il-6, IL-4); or expression of immunostimmulatory proteins (e.g. MHC-II)
- Itgam, CD86 expression as markers of M1 microglial phenotype
- Arg1, MRC1, as markers of M2 microglial phenotype
(for descriptions of techniques, see also Falsig 2004; Lund 2006 ; Kuegler 2010; Monnet-Tschudi et al., 2011; Sandström et al., 2014; von Tobel et al., 2014)
Regulatory example using the KE:Measurement of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in brain tissue, whose increase is a marker of astrocyte reactivity, is required by the US EPA in rodent toxicity studies for fuel additives (40 CFR 79.67), but is optional for other toxicant evaluations..
References
Aschner M (1998) Immune and inflammatory responses in the CNS: modulation by astrocytes. ToxicolLett 103: 283-287
Banati, R. B. (2002). "Visualising microglial activation in vivo." Glia 40: 206-217.
Brown GC, Bal-Price A (2003) Inflammatory neurodegeneration mediated by nitric oxide, glutamate, and mitochondria. Mol Neurobiol 27: 325-355
Charleston JS, Body RL, Bolender RP, Mottet NK, Vahter ME, Burbacher TM. 1996. Changes in the number of astrocytes and microglia in the thalamus of the monkey Macaca fascicularis following long-term subclinical methylmercury exposure. NeuroToxicology 17: 127-138.
Charleston JS, Bolender RP, Mottet NK, Body RL, Vahter ME, Burbacher TM. 1994. Increases in the number of reactive glia in the visual cortex of Macaca fascicularis following subclinical long-term methyl mercury exposure. ToxicolApplPharmacol 129: 196-206.
Dong Y, Benveniste EN (2001) Immune Function of Astrocytes. Glia 36: 180-190
Eng LF, Ghirnikar RS, Lee YL (2000) Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein: GFAP-Thirty-One Years (1969-2000). NeurochemRes 25: 1439-1451
Eskes C, Honegger P, Juillerat-Jeanneret L, Monnet-Tschudi F. 2002. Microglial reaction induced by noncytotoxic methylmercury treatment leads to neuroprotection via interactions with astrocytes and IL-6 release. Glia 37(1): 43-52.
Falsig J, Latta M, Leist M. Defined inflammatory states in astrocyte cultures correlation with susceptibility towards CD95-driven apoptosis. J Neurochem. 2004 Jan;88(1):181-93.
Falsig J, Pörzgen P, Lund S, Schrattenholz A, Leist M. The inflammatory transcriptome of reactive murine astrocytes and implications for their innate immune function. J Neurochem. 2006 Feb;96(3):893-907.
Falsig J, van Beek J, Hermann C, Leist M. Molecular basis for detection of invading pathogens in the brain. J Neurosci Res. 2008 May 15;86(7):1434-47.
Glass CK, Saijo K, Winner B, Marchetto MC, Gage FH (2010). Mechanisms underlying inflammation in neurodegeneration. Cell. 2010 Mar 19;140(6):918-34.
Gordon S (2003) Alternative activation of macrophages. Nat Rev Immunol 3: 23-35
Graeber MB, Streit WJ (1990) Microglia: immune network in the CNS. Brain Pathol 1: 2-5
Kigerl KA, Gensel JC, Ankeny DP, Alexander JK, Donnelly DJ, Popovich PG (2009) Identification of two distinct macrophage subsets with divergent effects causing either neurotoxicity or regeneration in the injured mouse spinal cord. J Neurosci 29: 13435-13444
Kuegler PB, Zimmer B, Waldmann T, Baudis B, Ilmjärv S, Hescheler J, Gaughwin P, Brundin P, Mundy W, Bal-Price AK, Schrattenholz A, Krause KH, van Thriel C, Rao MS, Kadereit S, Leist M. Markers of murine embryonic and neural stem cells, neurons and astrocytes: reference points for developmental neurotoxicity testing. ALTEX. 2010;27(1):17-42
Kreutzberg GW (1995) Microglia, the first line of defence in brain pathologies. Arzneimttelforsch 45: 357-360
Kreutzberg GW (1996) Microglia : a sensor for pathological events in the CNS. Trends Neurosci 19: 312-318
Liddelow SA, Guttenplan KA, Clarke LE, Bennett FC, Bohlen CJ, Schirmer L, et al. 2017. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature 541(7638): 481-487.
Little AR, Miller DB, Li S, Kashon ML, O'Callaghan JP. 2012. Trimethyltin-induced neurotoxicity: gene expression pathway analysis, q-RT-PCR and immunoblotting reveal early effects associated with hippocampal damage and gliosis. Neurotoxicol Teratol 34(1): 72-82.
Liu Y, Hu J, Wu J, Zhu C, Hui Y, Han Y, et al. 2012. alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated neuroprotection against dopaminergic neuron loss in an MPTP mouse model via inhibition of astrocyte activation. J Neuroinflammation 9: 98.
Lund S, Christensen KV, Hedtjärn M, Mortensen AL, Hagberg H, Falsig J, Hasseldam H, Schrattenholz A, Pörzgen P, Leist M. The dynamics of the LPS triggered inflammatory response of murine microglia under different culture and in vivo conditions. J Neuroimmunol. 2006 Nov;180(1-2):71-87.
Maresz K, Ponomarev ED, Barteneva N, Tan Y, Mann MK, Dittel BN (2008) IL-13 induces the expression of the alternative activation marker Ym1 in a subset of testicular macrophages. J Reprod Immunol 78: 140-148
Monnet-Tschudi F, Zurich MG, Honegger P (2007) Neurotoxicant-induced inflammatory response in three-dimensional brain cell cultures. Hum Exp Toxicol 26: 339-346
Monnet-Tschudi, F., A. Defaux, et al. (2011). "Methods to assess neuroinflammation." Curr Protoc Toxicol Chapter 12: Unit12 19.
Mosser DM, Edwards JP (2008) Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat Rev Immunol 8: 958-969
Nakajima K, Kohsaka S. 2004. Microglia: Neuroprotective and neurotrophic cells in the central nervous system. Current Drug Targets-Cardiovasc & Haematol Disorders 4: 65-84.
Perego C, Fumagalli S, De Simoni MG (2011) Temporal pattern of expression and colocalization of microglia/macrophage phenotype markers following brain ischemic injury in mice. J Neuroinflammation 8: 174
Ponomarev ED, Maresz K, Tan Y, Dittel BN (2007) CNS-derived interleukin-4 is essential for the regulation of autoimmune inflammation and induces a state of alternative activation in microglial cells. J Neurosci 27: 10714-10721
Ponomarev ED, Shriver LP, Maresz K, Dittel BN (2005) Microglial cell activation and proliferation precedes the onset of CNS autoimmunity. J Neurosci Res 81: 374-389
Ransohoff RM. 2016. A polarizing question: do M1 and M2 microglia exist? Nat Neurosci 19(8): 987-991.
Sandstrom von Tobel, J., D. Zoia, et al. (2014). "Immediate and delayed effects of subchronic Paraquat exposure during an early differentiation stage in 3D-rat brain cell cultures." Toxicol Lett. DOI : 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.02.001
Struzynska L, Dabrowska-Bouta B, Koza K, Sulkowski G (2007) Inflammation-Like Glial Response in Lead-Exposed Immature Rat Brain. Toxicol Sc 95:156-162
von Tobel, J. S., P. Antinori, et al. (2014). "Repeated exposure to Ochratoxin A generates a neuroinflammatory response, characterized by neurodegenerative M1 microglial phenotype." Neurotoxicology 44C: 61-70.
Venneti S, Lopresti BJ, Wiley CA. 2006. The peripheral benzodiazepine receptor (Translocator protein 18kDa) in microglia: from pathology to imaging. Prog Neurobiol 80(6): 308-322.
Xu DP, Zhang K, Zhang ZJ, Sun YW, Guo BJ, Wang YQ, et al. 2014. A novel tetramethylpyrazine bis-nitrone (TN-2) protects against 6-hydroxyldopamine-induced neurotoxicity via modulation of the NF-kappaB and the PKCalpha/PI3-K/Akt pathways. Neurochem Int 78: 76-85.
Zurich M-G, Eskes C, Honegger P, Bérode M, Monnet-Tschudi F. 2002. Maturation-dependent neurotoxicity of lead aceate in vitro: Implication of glial reactions. J Neurosc Res 70: 108-116.
Event: 1492: Tissue resident cell activation
Short Name: Tissue resident cell activation
Key Event Component
| Process | Object | Action |
|---|---|---|
| cell activation involved in immune response | increased |
AOPs Including This Key Event
Biological Context
| Level of Biological Organization |
|---|
| Cellular |
Domain of Applicability
| Life Stage | Evidence |
|---|---|
| All life stages |
| Sex | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Unspecific |
Extend to at least invertebrates
Not to plants and not to single-celled organisms
BRAIN:
Neuroinflammation is observed in human, monkey, rat, mouse, and zebrafish, in association with neurodegeneration or following toxicant exposure. Some references (non-exhaustive list) are given below for illustration:
In human: Vennetti et al., 2006
In monkey (Macaca fascicularis): Charleston et al., 1994, 1996
In rat: Little et al., 2012; Zurich et al., 2002; Eskes et al., 2002
In mouse: Liu et al., 2012
In zebrafish: Xu et al., 2014.
Key Event Description
Tissue resident cell activation is considered as a hallmark of inflammation irrespective of the tissue type. Strategically placed cells within tissues respond to noxious stimuli, thus regulating the recruitment of neutrophil and the initiation and resolution of inflammation (Kim and Luster, 2015). Examples for these cells are resident immune cells, parenchymal cells, vascular cells, stromal cells, or smooth muscle cells. These cells may be specific for a certain tissue, but they have a common tissue-independent role.
Under healthy conditions there is a homeostatic state, characterized as a generally quiescent cellular milieu. Various danger signals or alarmins that are involved in induction of inflammation like pathogen-associated molecular pattern molecules (PAMPs) and damage-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs) activate these resident cells in affected tissues.
Examples of well-characterized DAMPs (danger signals or alarmins) (Saïd-Sadier and Ojcius, 2012)
|
DAMPs |
Receptors |
Outcome of receptor ligation |
|---|---|---|
|
Extracellular nucleotides |
PI, P2X and P2Y receptors (ATP, ADP); Al, A2A, A2B and A3 receptors (adenosine) |
Dendritic cell (DC) maturation, chemotaxis, secretion of cytokines (IL-1β, IL-18), inflammation |
|
Extracellular heat shock |
CD14, CD91, scavenger |
DC maturation, cytokine induction, DC, migration to lymph nodes |
|
Extracellular HMGB1 |
RAGE, TLR2, TLR4 |
Chemotaxis, cytokine induction, DC activation, neutrophil recruitment, inflammation, activation of immune cells |
|
Uric acid crystals |
CD14, TLR2, TLR4 |
DC activation, cytokine induction, neutrophil recruitment, gout induction |
|
Oxidative stress |
Intracellular redox-sensitive proteins |
Cell death, release of endogenous DAMPs, inflammation |
|
Laminin |
Integrins |
Neutrophil recruitment, chemotaxis |
|
S100 proteins or |
RAGE |
Neutrophil recruitment, chemotaxis, cytokine secretion, apoptosis |
|
Hyaluronan |
TLR2, TLR4, CD44 |
DC maturation, cytokine production, adjuvant activity |
Activation refers to a phenotypic modification of the resident cells that includes alterations in their secretions, activation of biosynthetic pathways, production of pro-inflammatory proteins and lipids, and morphological changes. While these represent a pleiotropic range of responses that can vary with the tissue, there are a number of common markers or signs of activation that are measurable.
Examples of Common markers are
- NF-kB
- AP-1
- Jnk
- P38/mapk
These described commonalities allow the use of this KE as a hub KE in the AOP network. However, despite the similarities in the inflammatory process, the type of reactive cells and the molecules triggering their reactivity may be tissue-specific. Therefore, for practical reasons, a tissue specific description of the reactive cells and of the triggering factors is necessary in order to specify in a tissue-specific manner, which cell should be considered and what should be measured.
BRAIN
The most easily detectable feature of brain inflammation or neuroinflammation is activation of microglial cells and astrocytes. It is evidenced by changes in shape, increased expression of certain antigens, and accumulation and proliferation of the glial cells in affected regions (Aschner, 1998; Graeber & Streit, 1990; Monnet-Tschudi et al, 2007; Streit et al, 1999; Kraft and Harry, 2011; Claycomb et al., 2013). Upon stimulation by cytokines, chemokines or inflammogens (e.g. from pathogens or from damaged neurons), both glial cell types activate inflammatory signaling pathways, which result in increased expression and/or release of inflammatory mediators such as cytokines, eicosanoids, and metalloproteinases (Dong & Benveniste, 2001) (cf KE: pro-inflammatory mediators, increased), as well as in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitrogen species (RNS) (Brown & Bal-Price, 2003). Different types of activation states are possible for microglia and astrocytes, resulting in pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory signaling, and other cellular functions (such as phagocytosis) (Streit et al., 1999; Nakajima and Kohsaka, 2004). Therefore, neuroinflammation can have both neuroprotective/neuroreparative and neurodegenerative consequences (Carson et al., 2006; Monnet-Tschudi et al, 2007; Aguzzi et al., 2013 ; Glass et al., 2010). Under normal physiological conditions, microglial cells survey the nervous system for neuronal integrity (Nimmerjahn et al, 2005) and for invading pathogens (Aloisi, 2001; Kreutzberg, 1995; Kreutzberg, 1996; Rivest, 2009). They are the first type of cell activated (first line of defense), and can subsequently induce astrocyte activation (Falsig, 2008). Two distinct states of microglial activation have been described (Gordon, 2003; Kigerl et al, 2009; Maresz et al, 2008; Mosser & Edwards, 2008; Perego et al; Ponomarev et al, 2005): The M1 state is classically triggered by interferon-gamma and/or other pro-inflammatory cytokines, and this state is characterized by increased expression of integrin alpha M (Itgam) and CD86, as well as the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, IL-6), and it is mostly associated with neurodegeneration. The M2 state is triggered by IL-4 and IL-13 (Maresz et al, 2008; Perego et al, 2011; Ponomarev et al, 2007) and induces the expression of mannose receptor 1 (MRC1), arginase1 (Arg 1) and Ym1/2; it is involved in repair processes. The activation of astrocytes by microglia-derived cytokines or TLR agonists resembles the microglial M1 state (Falsig 2006). Although classification of the M1/M2 polarization of microglial cells may be considered as a simplification of authentic microglial reaction states (Ransohoff, 2016), a similar polarization of reactive astrocytes has been described recently Liddlelow et al., 2017): Interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1a), TNF and subcomponent q (C1q) released by activated microglial cells induce A1-reactive astrocytes, which lose the ability to promote neuronal survival, outgrowth, synaptogenesis and phagocytosis and induce the death of neurons and oligodendrocytes.
Regulatory examples using the KE
Measurement of GFAP in brain tissue, whose increase is a marker of astrocyte reactivity, is required by the US EPA in rodent toxicity studies for fuel additives (40 CFR 79.67), but is optional for other toxicant evaluations.
How it is Measured or Detected
In General:
Measurement targets are cell surface and intracellular markers; the specific markers may be cell and species-specific.
Available methods include cytometry, immunohistochemistry, gene expression sequencing; western blotting, ELISA, and functional assays.
BRAIN
Neuroinflammation, i.e. the activation of glial cells can be measured by quantification of cellular markers (most commonly), or of released mediators (less common). As multiple activation states exist for the two main cell types involved, it is necessary to measure several markers of neuroinflammation:
- Microglial activation can be detected based on the increased numbers of labeled microglia per volume element of brain tissue (due to increase of binding sites, proliferation, and immigration of cells) or on morphological changes. A specific microglial marker, used across different species, is CD11b. Alternatively various specific carbohydrate structures can be stained by lectins (e.g. IB4). Beyond that, various well-established antibodies are available to detect microglia in mouse tissue (F4/80), phagocytic microglia in rat tissue (ED1) or more generally microglia across species (Iba1). Transgenic mice are available with fluorescent proteins under the control of the CD11b promoter to easily quantify microglia without the need for specific stains.
- The most frequently used astrocyte marker is glial fibrillary acidic protein, GFAP (99% of all studies) (Eng et al., 2000). This protein is highly specific for astrocytes in the brain, and antibodies are available for immunocytochemical detection. In neuroinflamatory brain regions, the stain becomes more prominent, due to an upregulation of the protein, a shape change/proliferation of the cells, and/or better accessibility of the antibody. Various histological quantification approaches can be used. Occasionally, alternative astrocytic markers, such as vimentin of the S100beta protein, have been used for astrocyte staining (Struzynska et al., 2007). Antibodies for complement component 3 (C3), the most characteristic and highly upregulated marker of A1 neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are commercially available.
- All immunocytochemical methods can also be applied to cell culture models.
- In patients, microglial accumulation can be monitored by PET imaging, using [11C]-PK 11195 as a microglial marker (Banati et al., 2002).
- Activation of glial cells can be assessed in tissue or cell culture models also by quantification of sets of M1/M2 phenotype markers. This can for instance be done by PCR quantification, immunocytochemistry, immunoblotting.
- Itgam, CD86 expression as markers of M1 microglial phenotype
- Arg1, MRC1, as markers of M2 microglial phenotype
(for descriptions of techniques, see Falsig 2004; Lund 2006 ; Kuegler 2010; Monnet-Tschudi et al., 2011; Sandström et al., 2014; von Tobel et al., 2014)
References
Chan JK, Roth J, Oppenheim JJ, Tracey KJ, Vogl T, Feldmann M, Horwood N, Nanchahal J., Alarmins: awaiting a clinical response. J Clin Invest. 2012 Aug;122(8):2711-9.
Davies LC, Jenkins SJ, Allen JE, Taylor PR, Tissue-resident macrophages, Nat Immunol. 2013 Oct;14(10):986-95.
Escamilla-Tilch M, Filio-Rodríguez G, García-Rocha R, Mancilla-Herrera I, Mitchison NA, Ruiz-Pacheco JA, Sánchez-García FJ, Sandoval-Borrego D, Vázquez-Sánchez EA, The interplay between pathogen-associated and danger-associated molecular patterns: an inflammatory code in cancer? Immunol Cell Biol. 2013 Nov-Dec;91(10):601-10.
Hussell T, Bell TJ, Alveolar macrophages: plasticity in a tissue-specific context, Nat Rev Immunol. 2014 Feb;14(2):81-93.
Kim ND, Luster AD. The role of tissue resident cells in neutrophil recruitment ,Trends Immunol. 2015 Sep;36(9):547-55.
Saïd-Sadier N, Ojcius DM., Alarmins, inflammasomes and immunity. Biomed J. 2012 Nov-Dec;35(6):437-49.
Schaefer L, Complexity of danger: the diverse nature of damage-associated molecular patterns, J Biol Chem. 2014 Dec 19;289(51):35237-45.
BRAIN:
Aschner M (1998) Immune and inflammatory responses in the CNS: modulation by astrocytes. ToxicolLett 103: 283-287
Banati, R. B. (2002). "Visualising microglial activation in vivo." Glia 40: 206-217.
Brown GC, Bal-Price A (2003) Inflammatory neurodegeneration mediated by nitric oxide, glutamate, and mitochondria. Mol Neurobiol 27: 325-355
Charleston JS, Body RL, Bolender RP, Mottet NK, Vahter ME, Burbacher TM. 1996. Changes in the number of astrocytes and microglia in the thalamus of the monkey Macaca fascicularis following long-term subclinical methylmercury exposure. NeuroToxicology 17: 127-138.
Charleston JS, Bolender RP, Mottet NK, Body RL, Vahter ME, Burbacher TM. 1994. Increases in the number of reactive glia in the visual cortex of Macaca fascicularis following subclinical long-term methyl mercury exposure. ToxicolApplPharmacol 129: 196-206.
Dong Y, Benveniste EN (2001) Immune Function of Astrocytes. Glia 36: 180-190
Eng LF, Ghirnikar RS, Lee YL (2000) Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein: GFAP-Thirty-One Years (1969-2000). NeurochemRes 25: 1439-1451
Eskes C, Honegger P, Juillerat-Jeanneret L, Monnet-Tschudi F. 2002. Microglial reaction induced by noncytotoxic methylmercury treatment leads to neuroprotection via interactions with astrocytes and IL-6 release. Glia 37(1): 43-52.
Falsig J, Latta M, Leist M. Defined inflammatory states in astrocyte cultures correlation with susceptibility towards CD95-driven apoptosis. J Neurochem. 2004 Jan;88(1):181-93.
Falsig J, Pörzgen P, Lund S, Schrattenholz A, Leist M. The inflammatory transcriptome of reactive murine astrocytes and implications for their innate immune function. J Neurochem. 2006 Feb;96(3):893-907.
Falsig J, van Beek J, Hermann C, Leist M. Molecular basis for detection of invading pathogens in the brain. J Neurosci Res. 2008 May 15;86(7):1434-47.
Glass CK, Saijo K, Winner B, Marchetto MC, Gage FH (2010). Mechanisms underlying inflammation in neurodegeneration. Cell. 2010 Mar 19;140(6):918-34.
Gordon S (2003) Alternative activation of macrophages. Nat Rev Immunol 3: 23-35
Graeber MB, Streit WJ (1990) Microglia: immune network in the CNS. Brain Pathol 1: 2-5
Kigerl KA, Gensel JC, Ankeny DP, Alexander JK, Donnelly DJ, Popovich PG (2009) Identification of two distinct macrophage subsets with divergent effects causing either neurotoxicity or regeneration in the injured mouse spinal cord. J Neurosci 29: 13435-13444
Kuegler PB, Zimmer B, Waldmann T, Baudis B, Ilmjärv S, Hescheler J, Gaughwin P, Brundin P, Mundy W, Bal-Price AK, Schrattenholz A, Krause KH, van Thriel C, Rao MS, Kadereit S, Leist M. Markers of murine embryonic and neural stem cells, neurons and astrocytes: reference points for developmental neurotoxicity testing. ALTEX. 2010;27(1):17-42
Kreutzberg GW (1995) Microglia, the first line of defence in brain pathologies. Arzneimttelforsch 45: 357-360
Kreutzberg GW (1996) Microglia : a sensor for pathological events in the CNS. Trends Neurosci 19: 312-318
Liddelow SA, Guttenplan KA, Clarke LE, Bennett FC, Bohlen CJ, Schirmer L, et al. 2017. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature 541(7638): 481-487.
Little AR, Miller DB, Li S, Kashon ML, O'Callaghan JP. 2012. Trimethyltin-induced neurotoxicity: gene expression pathway analysis, q-RT-PCR and immunoblotting reveal early effects associated with hippocampal damage and gliosis. Neurotoxicol Teratol 34(1): 72-82.
Liu Y, Hu J, Wu J, Zhu C, Hui Y, Han Y, et al. 2012. alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated neuroprotection against dopaminergic neuron loss in an MPTP mouse model via inhibition of astrocyte activation. J Neuroinflammation 9: 98.
Lund S, Christensen KV, Hedtjärn M, Mortensen AL, Hagberg H, Falsig J, Hasseldam H, Schrattenholz A, Pörzgen P, Leist M. The dynamics of the LPS triggered inflammatory response of murine microglia under different culture and in vivo conditions. J Neuroimmunol. 2006 Nov;180(1-2):71-87.
Maresz K, Ponomarev ED, Barteneva N, Tan Y, Mann MK, Dittel BN (2008) IL-13 induces the expression of the alternative activation marker Ym1 in a subset of testicular macrophages. J Reprod Immunol 78: 140-148
Monnet-Tschudi F, Zurich MG, Honegger P (2007) Neurotoxicant-induced inflammatory response in three-dimensional brain cell cultures. Hum Exp Toxicol 26: 339-346
Monnet-Tschudi, F., A. Defaux, et al. (2011). "Methods to assess neuroinflammation." Curr Protoc Toxicol Chapter 12: Unit12 19.
Mosser DM, Edwards JP (2008) Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat Rev Immunol 8: 958-969
Nakajima K, Kohsaka S. 2004. Microglia: Neuroprotective and neurotrophic cells in the central nervous system. Current Drug Targets-Cardiovasc & Haematol Disorders 4: 65-84.
Perego C, Fumagalli S, De Simoni MG (2011) Temporal pattern of expression and colocalization of microglia/macrophage phenotype markers following brain ischemic injury in mice. J Neuroinflammation 8: 174
Ponomarev ED, Maresz K, Tan Y, Dittel BN (2007) CNS-derived interleukin-4 is essential for the regulation of autoimmune inflammation and induces a state of alternative activation in microglial cells. J Neurosci 27: 10714-10721
Ponomarev ED, Shriver LP, Maresz K, Dittel BN (2005) Microglial cell activation and proliferation precedes the onset of CNS autoimmunity. J Neurosci Res 81: 374-389
Ransohoff RM. 2016. A polarizing question: do M1 and M2 microglia exist? Nat Neurosci 19(8): 987-991.
Sandstrom von Tobel, J., D. Zoia, et al. (2014). "Immediate and delayed effects of subchronic Paraquat exposure during an early differentiation stage in 3D-rat brain cell cultures." Toxicol Lett. DOI : 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.02.001
Struzynska L, Dabrowska-Bouta B, Koza K, Sulkowski G (2007) Inflammation-Like Glial Response in Lead-Exposed Immature Rat Brain. Toxicol Sc 95:156-162
von Tobel, J. S., P. Antinori, et al. (2014). "Repeated exposure to Ochratoxin A generates a neuroinflammatory response, characterized by neurodegenerative M1 microglial phenotype." Neurotoxicology 44C: 61-70.
Venneti S, Lopresti BJ, Wiley CA. 2006. The peripheral benzodiazepine receptor (Translocator protein 18kDa) in microglia: from pathology to imaging. Prog Neurobiol 80(6): 308-322.
Xu DP, Zhang K, Zhang ZJ, Sun YW, Guo BJ, Wang YQ, et al. 2014. A novel tetramethylpyrazine bis-nitrone (TN-2) protects against 6-hydroxyldopamine-induced neurotoxicity via modulation of the NF-kappaB and the PKCalpha/PI3-K/Akt pathways. Neurochem Int 78: 76-85.
Zurich M-G, Eskes C, Honegger P, Bérode M, Monnet-Tschudi F. 2002. Maturation-dependent neurotoxicity of lead aceate in vitro: Implication of glial reactions. J Neurosc Res 70: 108-116.
Event: 1493: Increased Pro-inflammatory mediators
Short Name: Increasaed pro-inflammatory mediators
Key Event Component
| Process | Object | Action |
|---|---|---|
| acute inflammatory response | increased |
AOPs Including This Key Event
Biological Context
| Level of Biological Organization |
|---|
| Tissue |
Domain of Applicability
| Life Stage | Evidence |
|---|---|
| All life stages |
| Sex | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Unspecific |
Key Event Description
Inflammatory mediators are soluble, diffusible molecules that act locally at the site of tissue damage and infection, and at more distant sites. They can be divided into exogenous and endogenous mediators.
Exogenous mediators of inflammation are bacterial products or toxins like endotoxin or LPS. Endogenous mediators of inflammation are produced from within the (innate and adaptive) immune system itself, as well as other systems. They can be derived from molecules that are normally present in the plasma in an inactive form, such as peptide fragments of some components of complement, coagulation, and kinin systems. Or they can be released at the site of injury by a number of cell types that either contain them as preformed molecules within storage granules, e.g. histamine, or which can rapidly switch on the machinery required to synthesize the mediators.
Table1: a non-exhaustive list of examples for pro-inflammatory mediators
|
Classes of inflammatory mediators |
Examples |
|
Pro-inflammatory cytokines |
TNF-a, Interleukins (IL-1, IL-6, IL-8), Interferons (IFN-g), chemokines (CXCL, CCL, GRO-α, MCP-1), GM-CSF |
|
Prostaglandins |
PGE2 |
|
Bradykinin |
|
|
Vasoactive amines |
histamine, serotonin |
|
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) |
O2-, H2O2 |
|
Reactive nitrogen species (RNS) |
NO, iNOS |
The increased production of pro-inflammatory mediators can have negative consequences on the parenchymal cells leading even to cell death, as described for TNF-a or peroxynitrite on neurons (Chao et al., 1995; Brown and Bal-Price, 2003). In addition, via a feedback loop, they can act on the reactive resident cells thus maintaining or exacerbating their reactive state; and by modifying elements of their signalling pathways, they can favour the M1 phenotypic polarization and the chronicity of the inflammatory process (Taetzsch et al., 2015).
Basically, this event occurs equally in various tissues and does not require tissue-specific descriptions. Nevertheless, there are some specificities such as the release of glutamate by brain reactive glial cells (Brown and Bal-Price, 2003; Vesce et al., 2007).The differences may rather reside in the type of insult favouring the increased expression and/or release of a specific class of inflammatory mediators, as well the time after the insult reflecting different stages of the inflammatory process. For these reasons, the analyses of the changes of a battery of inflammatory mediators rather than of a single one is a more adequate measurement of this KE.
How it is Measured or Detected
The specific type of measurement(s) might vary with tissue, environment and context and will need to be described for different tissue contexts as used within different AOP descriptions.
In general, quantification of inflammatory markers can be done by:
- PCR (mRNA expression)
- ELISA
- Immunocytochemistry
- Immunoblotting
For descriptions of techniques, see Falsig 2004; Lund 2006 ; Kuegler 2010; Monnet-Tschudi et al., 2011; Sandström et al., 2014; von Tobel et al., 2014
References
Brown GC, Bal-Price A (2003) Inflammatory neurodegeneration mediated by nitric oxide, glutamate, and mitochondria. Mol Neurobiol 27: 325-355
Dong Y, Benveniste EN (2001) Immune Function of Astrocytes. Glia 36: 180-190
Falsig J, Latta M, Leist M. Defined inflammatory states in astrocyte cultures correlation with susceptibility towards CD95-driven apoptosis. J Neurochem. 2004 Jan;88(1):181-93.
Falsig J, Pörzgen P, Lund S, Schrattenholz A, Leist M. The inflammatory transcriptome of reactive murine astrocytes and implications for their innate immune function. J Neurochem. 2006 Feb;96(3):893-907.
Falsig J, van Beek J, Hermann C, Leist M. Molecular basis for detection of invading pathogens in the brain. J Neurosci Res. 2008 May 15;86(7):1434-47.
Hamadi N, Sheikh A, Madjid N, Lubbad L, Amir N, Shehab SA, Khelifi-Touhami F, Adem A: Increased pro-inflammatory cytokines, glial activation and oxidative stress in the hippocampus after short-term bilateral adrenalectomy. BMC Neurosci 2016, 17:61.
Kuegler PB, Zimmer B, Waldmann T, Baudis B, Ilmjärv S, Hescheler J, Gaughwin P, Brundin P, Mundy W, Bal-Price AK, Schrattenholz A, Krause KH, van Thriel C, Rao MS, Kadereit S, Leist M. Markers of murine embryonic and neural stem cells, neurons and astrocytes: reference points for developmental neurotoxicity testing. ALTEX. 2010;27(1):17-42
Lund S, Christensen KV, Hedtjärn M, Mortensen AL, Hagberg H, Falsig J, Hasseldam H, Schrattenholz A, Pörzgen P, Leist M. The dynamics of the LPS triggered inflammatory response of murine microglia under different culture and in vivo conditions. J Neuroimmunol. 2006 Nov;180(1-2):71-87.
Monnet-Tschudi, F., A. Defaux, et al. (2011). "Methods to assess neuroinflammation." Curr Protoc Toxicol Chapter 12: Unit12 19.
Sandstrom von Tobel, J., D. Zoia, et al. (2014). "Immediate and delayed effects of subchronic Paraquat exposure during an early differentiation stage in 3D-rat brain cell cultures." Toxicol Lett. DOI : 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.02.001
Taetzsch T, Levesque S, McGraw C, Brookins S, Luqa R, Bonini MG, Mason RP, Oh U, Block ML (2015) Redox regulation of NF-kappaB p50 and M1 polarization in microglia. Glia 5, 63:423-440.
Vesce S, Rossi D, Brambilla L, Volterra A (2007) Glutamate release from astrocytes in physiological conditions and in neurodegenerative disorders characterized by neuroinflammation. Int Rev Neurobiol. 82 :57-71.
Event: 386: Decrease of neuronal network function
Short Name: Neuronal network function, Decreased
Key Event Component
| Process | Object | Action |
|---|---|---|
| synaptic signaling | decreased |
AOPs Including This Key Event
Biological Context
| Level of Biological Organization |
|---|
| Organ |
Organ term
| Organ term |
|---|
| brain |
Domain of Applicability
| Life Stage | Evidence |
|---|---|
| During brain development | High |
| Sex | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Mixed | High |
In vitro studies in brain slices applying electrophysiological techniques showed significant variability among species (immature rats, rabbits and kittens) related to synaptic latency, duration, amplitude and efficacy in spike initiation (reviewed in Erecinska et al., 2004).
Key Event Description
Biological state: There are striking differences in neuronal network formation and function among the developing and mature brain. The developing brain shows a slow maturation and a transient passage from spontaneous, long-duration action potentials to synaptically-triggered, short-duration action potentials.
Furthermore, at this precise developmental stage the neuronal network is characterised by "hyperexcitability”, which is related to the increased number of local circuit recurrent excitatory synapses and the lack of γ-amino-butyric acid A (GABAA)-mediated inhibitory function that appears much later. This “hyperexcitability” disappears with maturation when pairing of the pre- and postsynaptic partners occurs and synapses are formed generating population of postsynaptic potentials and population of spikes followed by developmental GABA switch. Glutamatergic neurotransmission is dominant at early stages of development and NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic currents are far more times longer than those in maturation, allowing more calcium to enter the neurons. The processes that are involved in increased calcium influx and the subsequent intracellular events seem to play a critical role in establishment of wiring of neural circuits and strengthening of synaptic connections during development (reviewed in Erecinska et al., 2004). Neurons that do not receive glutaminergic stimulation are undergoing developmental apoptosis.
During the neonatal period, the brain is subject to profound alterations in neuronal circuitry due to high levels of synaptogenesis and gliogenesis. For example, in neuroendocrine regions such as the preoptic area-anterior hypothalamus (POA-AH), the site of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) system is developmentally regulated by glutamatergic neurons. The changes in the expression of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor subunits NR1 and NR2B system begin early in postnatal development, before the onset of puberty, thereby playing a role in establishing the appropriate environment for the subsequent maturation of GnRH neurons (Adams et al., 1999).
Biological compartments: Neural network formation and function happen in all brain regions but it appears to onset at different time points of development (reviewed in Erecinska et al., 2004). Glutamatergic neurotransmission in hippocampus is poorly developed at birth. Initially, NMDA receptors play important role but the vast majority of these premature glutamatergic synapses are “silent” possibly due to delayed development of hippocampal AMPA receptors. In contrast, in the cerebral cortex the maturation of excitatory glutamatergic neurotransmission happens much earlier. The “silent” synapses disappear by PND 7-8 in both brain regions mentioned above.
There is strong evidence suggesting that NMDA receptor subunit composition controls synaptogenesis and synapse stabilization (Gambrill and Barria, 2011). It is established fact that during early postnatal development in the rat hippocampus, synaptogenesis occurs in parallel with a developmental switch in the subunit composition of NMDA receptors from NR2B to NR2A. It is suggested that early expression of NR2A in organotypic hippocampal slices reduces the number of synapses and the volume and dynamics of spines. In contrast, overexpression of NR2B does not affect the normal number and growth of synapses. However, it does increase spine motility, adding and retracting spines at a higher rate. The C terminus of NR2B, and specifically its ability to bind CaMKII, is sufficient to allow proper synapse formation and maturation. Conversely, the C terminus of NR2A was sufficient to stop the development of synapse number and spine growth. These results indicate that the ratio of synaptic NR2B over NR2A controls spine motility and synaptogenesis, and suggest a structural role for the intracellular C terminus of NR2 in recruiting the signalling and scaffolding molecules necessary for proper synaptogenesis. Interestingly, it was found that genetic deletion of NR3A accelerates glutamatergic synaptic transmission, as measured by AMPAR-mediated postsynaptic currents recorded in hippocampal CA1. Consistent, the deletion of NR3A accelerates the expression of the glutamate receptor subunits NR1, NR2A, and GluR1 sugesting that glutamatergic synapse maturation is critically dependent upon activation of NMDA-type glutamate receptors (Henson et al., 2012).
General role in biology: The development of neuronal networks can be distinguished into two phases: an early ‘establishment’ phase of neuronal connections, where activity-dependent and independent mechanisms could operate, and a later ‘maintenance’ phase, which appears to be controlled by neuronal activity (Yuste and Sur, 1999). These neuronal networks facilitate information flow that is necessary to produce complex behaviors, including learning and memory (Mayford et al., 2012).
How it is Measured or Detected
Methods that have been previously reviewed and approved by a recognized authority should be included in the Overview section above. All other methods, including those well established in the published literature, should be described here. Consider the following criteria when describing each method: 1. Is the assay fit for purpose? 2. Is the assay directly or indirectly (i.e. a surrogate) related to a key event relevant to the final adverse effect in question? 3. Is the assay repeatable? 4. Is the assay reproducible?
In vivo: The recording of brain activity by using electroencephalography (EEG), electrocorticography (ECoG) and local field potentials (LFP) assists towards the collection of signals generated by multiple neuronal cell networks. Advances in computer technology have allowed quantification of the EEG and expansion of quantitative EEG (qEEG) analysis providing a sensitive tool for time-course studies of different compounds acting on neuronal networks' function (Binienda et al., 2011). The number of excitatory or inhibitory synapses can be functionally studied at an electrophysiological level by examining the contribution of glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic inputs. The number of them can be determined by variably clamping the membrane potential and recording excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs or IPSCs) (Liu, 2004).
In vitro: Microelectrode array (MEA) recordings are also used to measure electrical activity in cultured neurons (Keefer et al., 2001, Gramowski et al., 2000; Gopal, 2003; Johnstone et al., 2010). MEAs can be applied in high throughput platforms to facilitate screening of numerous chemical compounds (McConnell et al., 2012). Using selective agonists and antagonists of different classes of receptors their response can be evaluated in a quantitative manner (Novellino et al., 2011; Hogberg et al., 2011). Patch clamping technique can also be used to measure neuronal network activity.
References
Adams MM, Flagg RA, Gore AC., Perinatal changes in hypothalamic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and their relationship to gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons. Endocrinology. 1999 May;140(5):2288-96.
Binienda ZK, Beaudoin MA, Thorn BT, Ali SF. (2011) Analysis of electrical brain waves in neurotoxicology: γ-hydroxybutyrate. Curr Neuropharmacol. 9: 236-239.
Erecinska M, Cherian S, Silver IA. (2004) Energy metabolism in mammalian brain during development. Prog Neurobiol. 73: 397-445.
Gambrill AC, Barria A. NMDA receptor subunit composition controls synaptogenesis and synapse stabilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011:108(14):5855-60.
Gopal K. (2003) Neurotoxic effects of mercury on auditory cortex networks growing on microelectrode arrays: a preliminary analysis. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 25: 69-76.
Gramowski A, Schiffmann D, Gross GW. (2000) Quantification of acute neurotoxic effects of trimethyltin using neuronal networks cultures on microelectrode arrays. Neurotoxicology 21: 331-342.
Henson MA, Larsen RS, Lawson SN, Pérez-Otaño I, Nakanishi N, Lipton SA, Philpot BD. (2012) Genetic deletion of NR3A accelerates glutamatergic synapse maturation. PLoS One. 7(8).
Hogberg HT, Sobanski T, Novellino A, Whelan M, Weiss DG, Bal-Price AK. (2011) Application of micro-electrode arrays (MEAs) as an emerging technology for developmental neurotoxicity: evaluation of domoic acid-induced effects in primary cultures of rat cortical neurons. Neurotoxicology 32: 158-168.
Johnstone AFM, Gross GW, Weiss D, Schroeder O, Shafer TJ. (2010) Use of microelectrode arrays for neurotoxicity testing in the 21st century Neurotoxicology 31: 331-350.
Keefer E, Norton S, Boyle N, Talesa V, Gross G. (2001) Acute toxicity screening of novel AChE inhibitors using neuronal networks on microelectrode arrays. Neurotoxicology 22: 3-12.
Liu G. (2004) Local structural balance and functional interaction of excitatory and inhibitory synapses in hippocampal dendrites. Nat Neurosci. 7: 373-379.
Mayford M, Siegelbaum SA, Kandel ER. (2012) Synapses and memory storage. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 4. pii: a005751.
McConnell ER, McClain MA, Ross J, LeFew WR, Shafer TJ. (2012) Evaluation of multi-well microelectrode arrays for neurotoxicity screening using a chemical training set. Neurotoxicology 33: 1048-1057.
Novellino A, Scelfo B, Palosaari T, Price A, Sobanski T, Shafer TJ, Johnstone AF, Gross GW, Gramowski A, Schroeder O, Jügelt K, Chiappalone M, Benfenati F, Martinoia S, Tedesco MT, Defranchi E, D'Angelo P, Whelan M. (2011) Development of micro-electrode array based tests for neurotoxicity: assessment of interlaboratory reproducibility with neuroactive chemicals. Front Neuroeng. 4: 4.
Yuste R, Peinado A, Katz LC. (1992) Neuronal domains in developing neocortex. Science 257: 665-669.
List of Adverse Outcomes in this AOP
Event: 341: Impairment, Learning and memory
Short Name: Impairment, Learning and memory
Key Event Component
| Process | Object | Action |
|---|---|---|
| learning | decreased | |
| memory | decreased |
AOPs Including This Key Event
Biological Context
| Level of Biological Organization |
|---|
| Individual |
Domain of Applicability
| Life Stage | Evidence |
|---|---|
| During brain development | High |
| Sex | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Mixed | High |
Basic forms of learning behavior such as habituation have been found in many taxa from worms to humans (Alexander, 1990). More complex cognitive processes such as executive function likely reside only in higher mammalian species such as non-human primates and humans. Recently, larval zebrafish has also been suggested as a model for the study of learning and memory (Roberts et al., 2013).
Key Event Description
Learning can be defined as the process by which new information is acquired to establish knowledge by systematic study or by trial and error (Ono, 2009). Two types of learning are considered in neurobehavioral studies: a) associative learning and b) non-associative learning. Associative learning is based on making associations between different events. In associative learning, a subject learns the relationship among two different stimuli or between the stimulus and the subject’s behaviour. On the other hand, non-associative learning can be defined as an alteration in the behavioural response that occurs over time in response to a single type of stimulus. Habituation and sensitization are some examples of non-associative learning.
The memory formation requires acquisition, retention and retrieval of information in the brain, which is characterised by the non-conscious recall of information (Ono, 2009). There are three main categories of memory, including sensory memory, short-term or working memory (up to a few hours) and long-term memory (up to several days or even much longer).
Learning and memory depend upon the coordinated action of different brain regions and neurotransmitter systems constituting functionally integrated neural networks (D’Hooge and DeDeyn, 2001). Among the many brain areas engaged in the acquisition of, or retrieval of, a learned event, the hippocampal-based memory systems have received the most study. For example, the hippocampus has been shown to be critical for spatial-temporal memory, visio-spatial memory, verbal and narrative memory, and episodic and autobiographical memory (Burgess et al., 2000; Vorhees and Williams, 2014). However, there is substantial evidence that fundamental learning and memory functions are not mediated by the hippocampus alone but require a network that includes, in addition to the hippocampus, anterior thalamic nuclei, mammillary bodies cortex, cerebellum and basal ganglia (Aggleton and Brown, 1999; Doya, 2000; Mitchell et al., 2002, Toscano and Guilarte, 2005; Gilbert et al., 2006, 2016). Thus, damage to variety of brain structures can potentially lead to impairment of learning and memory. The main learning areas and pathways are similar in rodents and primates, including man (Eichenbaum, 2000; Stanton and Spear, 1990).
For the purposes of this KE (AO), impaired learning and memory is defined as an organism’s inability to establish new associative or non-associative relationships, or sensory, short-term or long-term memories which can be measured using different behavioural tests described below.
How it is Measured or Detected
In laboratory animals: in rodents, a variety of tests of learning and memory have been used to probe the integrity of hippocampal function. These include tests of spatial learning like the radial arm maze (RAM), the Barnes maze, passive avoidance and Spontaneous alternation and most commonly, the Morris water maze (MWM). Test of novelty such as novel object recognition, and fear based context learning are also sensitive to hippocampal disruption. Finally, trace fear conditioning which incorporates a temporal component upon traditional amygdala-based fear learning engages the hippocampus. A brief description of these tasks follows.
1) RAM, Barnes, MWM are examples of spatial tasks, animals are required to learn the location of a food reward (RAM); an escape hole to enter a preferred dark tunnel from a brightly lit open field area (Barnes maze), or a hidden platform submerged below the surface of the water in a large tank of water (MWM) (Vorhees and Williams, 2014).
2) Novel Object recognition. This is a simpler task that can be used to probe recognition memory. Two objects are presented to animal in an open field on trial 1, and these are explored. On trial 2, one object is replaced with a novel object and time spent interacting with the novel object is taken evidence of memory retention – I have seen one of these objects before, but not this one (Cohen and Stackman, 2015).
3) Contextual Fear conditioning is a hippocampal based learning task in which animals are placed in a novel environment and allowed to explore for several minutes before delivery of an aversive stimulus, typically a mild foot shock. Upon reintroduction to this same environment in the future (typically 24-48 hours after original training), animals will limit their exploration, the context of this chamber being associated with an aversive event. The degree of suppression of activity after training is taken as evidence of retention, i.e., memory (Curzon et al., 2009).
4) Trace fear conditioning. Standard fear conditioning paradigms require animals to make an association between a neutral conditioning stimulus (CS, a light or a tone) and an aversive stimulus (US, a footshock). The unconditioned response (CR) that is elicited upon delivery of the footshock US is freezing behavior. With repetition of CS/US delivery, the previously neutral stimulus comes to elicit the freezing response. This type of learning is dependent on the amygdala, a brain region associated with, but distinct from the hippocampus. Introducing a brief delay between presentation of the neutral CS and the aversive US, a trace period, requires the engagement of the amygdala and the hippocampus (Shors et al., 2004).
In humans: A variety of standardized learning and memory tests have been developed for human neuropsychological testing, including children (Rohlman et al., 2008). These include episodic autobiographical memory, perceptual motor tests, short and long term memory tests, working memory tasks, word pair recognition memory; object location recognition memory. Some have been incorporated in general tests of intelligence (IQ) such as the WAIS and the Wechsler. Modifications have been made and norms developed for incorporating of tests of learning and memory in children. Examples of some of these tests include:
1) Rey Osterieth Complex Figure (RCFT) which probes a variety of functions including as visuospatial abilities, memory, attention, planning, and working memory (Shin et al., 2006).
2) Children’s Auditory Verbal Learning Test (CAVLT) is a free recall of presented word lists that yields measures of Immediate Memory Span, Level of Learning, Immediate Recall, Delayed Recall, Recognition Accuracy, and Total Intrusions. (Lezak 1994; Talley, 1986).
3) Continuous Visual Memory Test (CVMT) measures visual learning and memory. It is a free recall of presented pictures/objects rather than words but that yields similar measures of Immediate Memory Span, Level of Learning, Immediate Recall, Delayed Recall, Recognition Accuracy, and Total Intrusions. (Lezak, 1984; 1994).
4) Story Recall from Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS) Logical Memory Test Battery, a standardized neurospychological test designed to measure memory functions (Lezak, 1994; Talley, 1986).
5) Autobiographical memory (AM) is the recollection of specific personal events in a multifaceted higher order cognitive process. It includes episodic memory- remembering of past events specific in time and place, in contrast to semantic autobiographical memory is the recollection of personal facts, traits, and general knowledge. Episodic AM is associated with greater activation of the hippocampus and a later and more gradual developmental trajectory. Absence of episodic memory in early life (infantile amnesia) is thought to reflect immature hippocampal function (Herold et al., 2015; Fivush, 2011).
6) Staged Autobiographical Memory Task. In this version of the AM test, children participate in a staged event involving a tour of the hospital, perform a series of tasks (counting footprints in the hall, identifying objects in wall display, buy lunch, watched a video). It is designed to contain unique event happenings, place, time, visual/sensory/perceptual details. Four to five months later, interviews are conducted using Children’s Autobiographical Interview and scored according to standardized scheme (Willoughby et al., 2014).
Regulatory Significance of the AO
A prime example of impairments in learning and memory as the adverse outcome for regulatory action is developmental lead exposure and IQ function in children (Bellinger, 2012). Most methods are well established in the published literature and many have been engaged to evaluate the effects of developmental thyroid disruption. The US EPA and OECD Developmental Neurotoxicity (DNT) Guidelines (OCSPP 870.6300 or OECD 426) both require testing of learning and memory (USEPA, 1998; OECD, 2007) advising to use the following tests passive avoidance, delayed-matching-to-position for the adult rat and for the infant rat, olfactory conditioning, Morris water maze, Biel or Cincinnati maze, radial arm maze, T-maze, and acquisition and retention of schedule-controlled behaviour. These DNT Guidelines have been deemed valid to identify developmental neurotoxicity and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes (Makris et al., 2009).
Also in the frame of the OECD GD 43 (2008) on reproductive toxicity, learning and memory testing may have potential to be applied in the context of developmental neurotoxicity studies. However, many of the learning and memory tasks used in guideline studies may not readily detect subtle impairments in cognitive function associated with modest degrees of developmental thyroid disruption (Gilbert et al., 2012).
References
Aggleton JP, Brown MW. (1999) Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal-anterior thalamic axis. Behav Brain Sci. 22: 425-489.
Alexander RD (1990) Epigenetic rules and Darwinian algorithms: The adaptive study of learning and development. Ethology and Sociobiology 11:241-303.
Bellinger DC (2012) A strategy for comparing the contributions of environmental chemicals and other risk factors to neurodevelopment of children. Environ Health Perspect 120:501-507.
Burgess N (2002) The hippocampus, space, and viewpoints in episodic memory. Q J Exp Psychol A 55:1057-1080. Cohen, SJ and Stackman, RW. (2015). Assessing rodent hippocampal involvement in the novel object recognition task. A review. Behav. Brain Res. 285: 105-1176.
Cohen, SJ and Stackman, RW. (2015). Assessing rodent hippocampal involvement in the novel object recognition task. A review. Behav. Brain Res. 285: 105-1176.
Curzon P, Rustay NR, Browman KE. Cued and Contextual Fear Conditioning for Rodents. In: Buccafusco JJ, editor. Methods of Behavior Analysis in Neuroscience. 2nd edition. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2009.
D'Hooge R, De Deyn PP (2001) Applications of the Morris water maze in the study of learning and memory. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 36:60-90.
Doya K. (2000) Complementary roles of basal ganglia and cerebellum in learning and motor control. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 10: 732-739.
Eichenbaum H (2000) A cortical-hippocampal system for declarative memory. Nat Rev Neurosci 1:41-50.
Fivush R. The development of autobiographical memory. Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:559-82.
Gilbert ME, Sanchez-Huerta K, Wood C (2016) Mild Thyroid Hormone Insufficiency During Development Compromises Activity-Dependent Neuroplasticity in the Hippocampus of Adult Male Rats. Endocrinology 157:774-787.
Gilbert ME, Rovet J, Chen Z, Koibuchi N. (2012) Developmental thyroid hormone disruption: prevalence, environmental contaminants and neurodevelopmental consequences. Neurotoxicology 33: 842-52.
Gilbert ME, Sui L (2006) Dose-dependent reductions in spatial learning and synaptic function in the dentate gyrus of adult rats following developmental thyroid hormone insufficiency. Brain Res 1069:10-22.
Herold, C, Lässer, MM, Schmid, LA, Seidl, U, Kong, L, Fellhauer, I, Thomann,PA, Essig, M and Schröder, J. (2015). Neuropsychology, Autobiographical Memory, and Hippocampal Volume in “Younger” and “Older” Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia. Front. Psychiatry, 6: 53.
Lezak MD (1984) Neuropsychological assessment in behavioral toxicology--developing techniques and interpretative issues. Scand J Work Environ Health 10 Suppl 1:25-29.
Lezak MD (1994) Domains of behavior from a neuropsychological perspective: the whole story. Nebr Symp Motiv 41:23-55.
Makris SL, Raffaele K, Allen S, Bowers WJ, Hass U, Alleva E, Calamandrei G, Sheets L, Amcoff P, Delrue N, Crofton KM. A retrospective performance assessment of the developmental neurotoxicity study in support of OECD test guideline 426. Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Jan;117(1):17-25.
Mitchell AS, Dalrymple-Alford JC, Christie MA. (2002) Spatial working memory and the brainstem cholinergic innervation to the anterior thalamus. J Neurosci. 22: 1922-1928.
OECD. 2007. OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals/ section 4: Health effects. Test no. 426: Developmental neurotoxicity study. www.Oecd.Org/dataoecd/20/52/37622194.Pdf [accessed may 21, 2012].
OECD (2008) Nr 43 GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON MAMMALIAN REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY TESTING AND ASSESSMENT. ENV/JM/MONO(2008)16
Ono T. (2009) Learning and Memory. Encyclopedia of neuroscience. M D. Binder, N. Hirokawa and U. Windhorst (Eds). Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg. pp 2129-2137.
Roberts AC, Bill BR, Glanzman DL. (2013) Learning and memory in zebrafish larvae. Front Neural Circuits 7: 126.
Rohlman DS, Lucchini R, Anger WK, Bellinger DC, van Thriel C. (2008) Neurobehavioral testing in human risk assessment. Neurotoxicology. 29: 556-567.
Shin, MS, Park, SY, Park, SR, Oeol, SH and Kwon, JS. (2006). Clinical and empirical applications of the Rey-Osterieth complex figure test. Nature Protocols, 1: 892-899.
Shors TJ, Miesegaes G, Beylin A, Zhao M, Rydel T, Gould E (2001) Neurogenesis in the adult is involved in the formation of trace memories. Nature 410:372-376.
Stanton ME, Spear LP (1990) Workshop on the qualitative and quantitative comparability of human and animal developmental neurotoxicity, Work Group I report: comparability of measures of developmental neurotoxicity in humans and laboratory animals. Neurotoxicol Teratol 12:261-267.
Talley, JL. (1986). Memory in learning disabled children: Digit span and eh Rey Auditory verbal learning test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Elseiver.
Toscano CD, Guilarte TR. (2005) Lead neurotoxicity: From exposure to molecular effects. Brain Res Rev. 49: 529-554.
U.S.EPA. 1998. Health effects guidelines OPPTS 870.6300 developmental neurotoxicity study. EPA Document 712-C-98-239.Office of Prevention Pesticides and Toxic Substances.
Vorhees CV, Williams MT (2014) Assessing spatial learning and memory in rodents. ILAR J 55:310-332.
Willoughby KA, McAndrews MP, Rovet JF. Accuracy of episodic autobiographical memory in children with early thyroid hormone deficiency using a staged event. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Jul;9:1-11.
Appendix 2
List of Key Event Relationships in the AOP
List of Adjacent Key Event Relationships
Relationship: 1689: Binding, SH/seleno proteins leads to Oxidative Stress
AOPs Referencing Relationship
| AOP Name | Adjacency | Weight of Evidence | Quantitative Understanding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binding of electrophilic chemicals to SH(thiol)-group of proteins and /or to seleno-proteins during brain development leads to impairment of learning and memory | adjacent | High |
Evidence Supporting Applicability of this Relationship
| Life Stage | Evidence |
|---|---|
| During brain development, adulthood and aging | High |
| Sex | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Unspecific | High |
Mechanistic support for the link between interference of SH/SeH groups of proteins and induction of oxidative stress can be found in Zebrafish, rodents (mouse and rat) and to some extent in man (see Table 2).
Key Event Relationship Description
Proteins with cysteine amino acid residues contain thiol (SH) groups, and proteins with selenocysteine amino acid residues contain selenol (SeH) are characterized as cysteine-/selenoprotein family. Thiol and selenol groups exhibit reactivity toward electrophiles and oxidants and have high binding affinities for metals (Higdon, 2012; Nagy, 2013; Winterbourn, 2008; Winther, 2014).
Figure 1. (Poole, 2015) Structures of cysteinyl and selenocysteinyl residues within proteins. The aminoacyl groups are shown to the left, with dotted lines representing peptide bonds to the next residue on either side. Both protonated (left) and deprotonated (right) forms of these amino acids are depicted with average pKa values.
The selenoprotein family composes of proteins with diverse functionality, however, several are classified as antioxidant enzymes (Reeves, 2009) and this function is of particular importance for this KER. Relevant for this KER there are two well-studied functional selenoprotein families which are described to be expressed in the brain; (i) the Glutathione Peroxidase (GPx) family, involved in detoxification of peroxidases; (ii) the Thioredoxin Reductase (TrxR) family, which is involved in the regeneration of reduced thioredoxin (Pillai, 2014). However, there is also a number of other selenoproteins with diverse functions, from selenium transport (SelP), to ER stress response (SelK, M, N, S, T and Sep15, as well as DIO2) (Pisoschi, 2015; Reeves, 2009). Due to their described functionalities (summarized in table below) an increased oxidative stress as a consequence of interference with selenoprotein function, through binding to active-site thiol-/selenol groups will primarily concern the interference with proteins of the GPx- and TrxR families, as well as SelH, K, S, R, W, and P selenoproteins.
Table1
|
Selenoprotein family |
Protein name |
Normal brain function |
Disruption leading to oxidative stress |
Reference |
|
Glutathione |
GSH |
GSH is a major endogenous antioxidant functioning directly in neutralization of free radicals and reactive oxygen compounds. GSH is the reduced form of glutathione and its SH group of cysteine is able to reduce and/or maintain reduced form of other molecules. |
Disruptions leads to increased oxidative stress and apoptosis. |
(Dringen, 2000) (Hall, 1999) |
|
Glutathione Peroxidase (GPx) Family |
GPx1 |
Peroxide/ROS reduction (Promotes neuroprotection in response to oxidative challenge).
Brain expression levels are highest in microglia and lower levels detected in neurons. |
Brains of GPx1−/− mice are more vulnerable to mitochondrial toxin treatment, ischemia/ reperfusion, and cold-induced brain injury. Cultured neurons from GPx1−/− mice were reported to be more susceptible to Aβ-induced oxidative stress, and addition of ebselen reversed this. |
(Lindenau, 1998) (Crack, 2001;Flentjar, 2002;Klivenyi, 2000) (Crack, 2006) |
|
GPx4 |
Reduction of phospholipid Hydroperoxides. Only in neurons during normal conditions. |
Brains of GPx4+/− mice were shown to have increased lipid peroxidation (a sign of oxidative stress). Injury-induced GPx4 expression in astrocytes. In vivo over expression of GPx4 protects against oxidative stress-induced apoptosis. |
(Chen, 2008) (Savaskan, 2007) and (Borchert, 2006) and (Ran, 2004) |
|
|
Thioredoxin Reductase (TrxR) Family |
TrxR1 |
Cytocsolic localization. Contributes to the reduction of hydrogen peroxide and oxidative stress, and regulates redox-sensitive transcription factors that control cellular transcription mechanisms. TrxR-1 regulates the induction of the antioxidant enzyme heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1). |
Overexpression of human Trx1 and Trx2 protects retinal ganglion cells against oxidative stress-induced neurodegeneration. |
(Pitts, 2014) (Zhong, 2000)
(Burk, 2013) (Arbogast, 2010;Trigona, 2006) (Munemasa, 2008) |
|
TrxR2 |
Mitochondrial localization. Contribute to the reduction of hydrogen peroxide and oxidative stress, and regulates redox sensitive transcription factors that control cellular transcription mechanisms. |
Exogenously administered human rTrx ameliorates neuronal damage after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in mice, reduces oxidative/nitrative stress and neuronal apoptosis after cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice |
(Pitts, 2014) (Arbogast, 2010;Gladyshev, 1996;Papp, 2007) (Hattori, 2004)(Ma, 2012) |
|
|
Other relevant seleno- proteins |
SelH |
Nuclear localization. Redox sensing. |
Hypersensitivity of SelH shRNA HeLa cells to paraquat- and H2O2-induced oxidative stress.
|
(Panee, 2007)(Novoselov, 2007) (Wu, 2014) |
|
SelK |
Transmembrane protein localized to the ER membrane. ER homeostasis and oxidative stress response. |
Protects HepG2 cells from ER stress agent-induced apoptosis. Overexpression of SelK attenuated the intracellular reactive oxygen species level and protected cells from oxidative stress-induced toxicity in cardiomyocytes |
(Shchedrina, 2011) (Du, 2010) (Lu, 2006) |
|
|
SelS |
Transmembrane protein localized to the ER membrane. Catalyze the reduction of disulfide bonds and peroxides. |
SelS overexpression increased astrocyte resistance to ER-stress and inflammatory stimuli, and suppression of SelS compromised astrocyte viability. |
(Liu, 2013) (Fradejas, 2011) (Fradejas, 2008) (Gao, 2007) |
|
|
MSRB1, SelR, SelX |
Function in reduction of oxidized methionine residues, and actin polymerization. |
Induce expression of MSRB1 protects neurons from amyloid β-protein insults in vitro and in vivo. |
(Lee, 2013) (Moskovitz, 2011)(Pillai, 2014) |
|
|
SelW |
Expressed in synapses. Plays an antioxidant role in cells. |
Rat in vivo overexpression of SelW was shown to protect glial cells against oxidative stress caused by heavy metals and 2,20-Azobis. Silencing of SelW made neurons more sensitive to oxidative stress. |
(Reeves, 2009) (Sun, 2001) (Loflin, 2006) (Raman, 2013) (Chung, 2009) |
|
|
SelP |
Is important for selenium transport, distribution and retention within the brain. Acts as a ROS-detoxifying enzyme. Protects human astrocytes from induced oxidative. |
SelP-/- mice show neurological dysfunction and that Se content and GPx activity were reduced within brain, Se supplementation to diet attenuated. neurological dysfunctions. SelP-/- mice have reported deficits in PV-interneurons due to diminished antioxidant defense capabilities. Decreased neuronal selenoprotein synthesis may be a functional outcome of SelP Colocalization of Sel P with amyloid plaques
SelP can function as an antioxidant enzyme against reactive lipid intermediates |
(Steinbrenner, 2009)(Arbogast, 2010)(Zhang, 2008) (Hill, 2003;Hill, 2004) (Cabungcal, 2006) (Pitts, 2012) (Byrns, 2014)
(Schomburg, 2003)
(Rock, 2010) |
https://aopwiki.org/system/dragonfly/production/2018/01/26/9o3c62z5ej_AOP17_KER1_Table1.pdf
Binding to thiol/sulfhydyryl groups of these proteins can firstly result in structural modifications of these proteins, which in turn negatively effects the catalytic capacity and thereby reducing or blocking the metabolic capacity to neutralize reactive oxygen species (Fernandes, 1996; Rajanna, 1995), secondly, SH/SeH binding would also the instrinsic primary antioxidant functionalities of selenoproteins (Kohen, 2002; Pisoschi, 2015).
Evidence Supporting this KER
Biological PlausibilityPrimary antioxidants are mainly chain breakers, able to scavenge radical species by hydrogen donation. Secondary antioxidants are singlet oxygen quenchers, peroxide decomposers, metal chelators, oxidative enzyme inhibitors (Pisosci and Pop 2015).
Thiol- and selenol containing proteins have a high affinity for binding soft metals which contributes to the target site – brain – distribution of such toxicants (Farina, 2011).
GPx family
GPxs are tetrameric enzymes where their thiol groups can either act directly act as a reductant, or they catalyze reduction of hydrogen peroxide and/or phospholipid hydroperoxides through glutathione co-factors (Hanschmann, 2013; Labunskyy, 2014)
TrxR family
The thioredoxin reductase (TxRs) family of selenoproteins are homodimeric flavoenzymes, which mediate the reduction of oxidized Txn at the expense of NADPH (Birben et al., 2012). Inhibition of TrxR enzymes have been shown to lead to oxidative stress (Carvalho, 2008).
SelP
Downregulation of intracellular SelP by use of small interfering RNA (siRNA) impaired the viability of human astrocytes and made them more susceptible to hydroperoxide-induced oxidative stress, pointing to a direct contribution of SeP to ROS clearance (Steinbrenner, 2006)
Empirical EvidenceMercury
The selenol group (-SeH) of selenocysteines is generally more reactive than thiols (-SH) towards mercury (Sugiura 1976, Khan, 2009). Methyl mercury (MeHg) can target both the GPx and TrxR proteins thereby causing induction of oxidative stress and neurotoxicity (Branco, 2017; Carvalho, 2008; Farina, 2011).
Table 2
|
KEup Interference with SH/SeH |
KEdown Oxidative stress induction |
species; in vivo / in vitro |
Stressor |
Dose/ conc. + Duration of exp. |
Protective/ aggravating evidence |
Reference |
|
Post-transcriptional effects on GPx1 and TrxR1 expression and activity.
TrxR1 – 2-fold GPx1 – 0.6-fold |
Disturbance of redox-response and induction of oxidative stress.
SOD – 2-fold ROS – increased |
Mouse myoblast C2C12,
|
MeHg |
0.4 µM
9 h |
Treatment with ebselen suppressed MeHg-induced oxidative stress |
(Usuki, 2011) |
|
Inhibition of TrxR and GSH activities.
TrxR1&2 – 0.6-fold GSH – 0.7-fold |
Oxidative stress shown by shift in GSSG/GSH ratio.
GSSG/GSH – 1.5-fold |
Human neuroblastoma cells (SH-SY5Y) |
MeHg |
1 µM
|
Se supplementation gave some extent of oxidative stress protection. |
(Branco, 2017) |
|
Decreased activity of TrxR and GPx.
TrxR – 0.5-fold GPx – 0.5-fold |
Oxidative stress.
No fold reported. |
Zebra fish brain |
Hg2+, MeHg |
1.8 molar (measured in brain tissue), 28 days |
|
(Branco, 2012) |
|
Inhibition of GPx activity.
GPx – 0.4-fold |
Increased ROS formation and lipid peroxidation
ROS – 1.75-fold Total peroxidase – 4.5-fold Lipid perox. – 3-fold |
Mouse brain |
MeHg |
40 mg/L in drinking water
21-days |
Incubation of mitochondrial-enriched fractions with exogenous GPx completely blocked MeHg-induced mitochondrial lipid peroxidation. |
(Franco, 2009) |
|
Inhibition of GPx activity.
GPx – 0.7-fold |
Increased ROS formation and lipid peroxidation.
Total H2O2 – 1.5-fold |
Human neuro-blastoma SH-SY5Y cells. |
MeHg |
1 µM (nominal) |
Inhibition of GPx substantially enhanced MeHg toxicity. |
(Franco, 2009) |
|
Decreased GPx1, activity in cerebral cortex and hippocampus.
GPx1 – 0.5-fold |
Induction of oxidative stress (oxidative damage product from the reaction of ROS and deoxy-thymidine in DNA)
No fold-change reported. |
Male C57BL/6NJcl mice |
MeHg |
1.5 mg kg−1 day−1
6-weeks |
|
(Fujimura, 2017) |
|
Downregulation of antioxidant selenoprotein gene expression, and reduced GPx activity.
Gpx1a – 0.2-fold Gpx4a – 0.2-fold TxnRd1 – 0.5-fold GPx – 0.2-fold |
Indirect effects reported – larvae hypoactivity |
Zebra fish |
MeHg |
0.05 mg/kg DM
20-days |
0.7 mg/kg DM Se-supplementation partially restored GPx activity
GPx activity upregulated from 0.2-fold to 0.7-fold. |
(Penglase, 2014) |
|
Depletion of GSH levels.
GSH-activity: 10µM – 0.75-fold 30µM – 0.6-fold 100µM – 0,5-fold |
Increased glutathione oxidation, hydroperoxide formation (xylenol orange assay) and lipid peroxidation end-products (thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, TBARS).
Mitochondrial viability: 10µM – 0.75-fold 30µM – 0.6-fold 100µM – 0,5-fold Total hydroperoxidases: 10µM – 1.0-fold 30µM – 1.2-fold 100µM – 1.75-fold |
Mouse brain mito-chondrial-enriched fractions |
MeHg |
10, 30, and 100 μM
30 minutes |
The co-incubation with diphenyl diselenide (100 μM) completely prevented the disruption of mitochondrial activity as well as the increase in TBARS levels. thiol peroxidase activity of organoselenium compounds accounts for their protective actions against methylmercury-induced oxidative stress |
(Meinerz, 2011) |
|
Depletion of mono- and disulfide glutathione in neuronal, glial and mixed cultures
GSH activity – 0.83-fold |
increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation measured by dichlorodihydro-fluorescein (DCF) fluorescence
DCF – 1.2-1.5-fold |
Mouse primary cortical cultures |
MeHg |
5 µM
24h |
glutathione monoethyl ester (GSHME) (100 µM) supplementation protected against oxidative stress formation |
(Rush, 2012) |
|
Reduced glutathione (GSH) content decreased in liver, kidney and brain. |
Increased lipid peroxidation and generation of reactive oxygen species |
Adult male albino Sprague-Dawley rat |
Dimethylmercury (DMM) |
10 mg/kg bw
3-days |
Supplementation with Se (2 mmol/kg and 0.5 mg/kg partially protected against DMM-induced tissue damage. |
(Deepmala, 2013) |
|
Reduced glutathione (GSH) level and acetyl cholinesterase activity, as well as reduced antioxidant enzyme glutathione peroxidase (GPx) |
Increased lipid peroxidation level and DNA damage. |
Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats |
MeHg |
1 mg kg−1 orally
6 months |
|
(Joshi, 2014) |
|
Depleted GSH levels. |
Antioxidant imbalance and lipid peroxidation. |
Adult male Wistar rats |
mercuricchloride |
30ppm in drinking water |
|
(Agrawal, 2015) |
|
GSH levels decreased in astrocytes. |
Severe damage to the cell membranes, as well as to mitochondria. |
Primary mouse neuron and astrocyte co-cultures |
MeHg |
10, 25, or 50 µM nominal
24h exposure |
|
(Morken, 2005) |
|
GPx1 significantly decreased prior to neurotoxic effects being visible.
GPx1 – 0.7-fold |
Increased lipid Peroxidation and later neuronal cell death.
Lipid peroxidation - 1.75-fold |
Primary cultured mouse cerebellar granule cells |
MeHg |
300nM nominal
24h |
Overexpression of GPx-1 prevented MeHg-induced neuronal death |
(Farina, 2009) |
|
Reduction of GPx activity and increased glutathione reductase activity
GPx – 0.7-fold |
Increased oxidative stress – shown by increased TBA-RS and 8-OHdG content, as well as reduction of complexes I, II, and IV activities
H2O2 – 1.6-fold |
|
MeHg |
3–5 µg/g brain tissue
21-days
|
Treatment with diphenyl diselenide (PhSe)2 (5 µmol/kg) reversed MeHg’s inhibitory effect on mitochondrial activities, as well as the increased oxidative stress parameters. |
(Glaser, 2013) |
|
|
Oxidative stress (increased H2O2 production) |
Rat astro-glioma C6 cell line |
MeHg |
10 and 50 µM
1h |
Cell viability protective effect of 1 µM of the organic selenium compound (PhSe)2 |
(Glaser, 2013) |
|
|
Protein oxidation (increase of protein carbonyls) |
Mouse primary cortical neurons, and cerebellar granule cells |
MeHg |
10-600 nM |
All effects were prevented by co-treatment with the antioxidant probucol. |
(Caballero, 2017) |
|
Reduced glutathione peroxidase activity was found in the fetal side of human placental samples. |
|
Human placenta tissue samples – INMA Valencia mother-infant cohort (Spain) |
MeHg |
20-40 µg/mL blood plasma |
|
(Caballero, 2017) |
https://aopwiki.org/system/dragonfly/production/2018/01/26/94pzx39utv_AOP17_KER1_Table2.pdf
Acrylamide (acrylamide is a common food contaminant generated by heat processing)
No literature supporting the link “SH/she binding leads to oxidative stress” for acrylamide as stressor in brain/neural tissue can be found.
Acrolein
No literature supporting the link “SH/she binding leads to oxidative stress” for acrolein as stressor in brain/neural tissue can be found.
Uncertainties and InconsistenciesAnother important group of thiol-containing proteins are the metal-binging detoxifying metallothioneins. This protein family bind mercury and lead, and this binding thus serves as a protective mechanism and also protects against metal toxicity and oxidative stress (Aschner, 2006).
Lactational exposure to methylmercury (10 mg/L in drinking water) significantly increased cerebellar GSH level and GR activity. Possibly a compensatory response to mercury-induced oxidative stress (Franco et al., 2006)
Methylmercury cytotoxicity in PC12 cells is mediated by primary glutathione depletion independent of excess reactive oxygen species generation (Gatti et al., 2004).
References
|
Agrawal, S., P. Bhatnagar and S. J. Flora (2015). "Changes in tissue oxidative stress, brain biogenic amines and acetylcholinesterase following co-exposure to lead, arsenic and mercury in rats." Food Chem Toxicol 86: 208-216. |
|
Arbogast, S. and A. Ferreiro (2010). "Selenoproteins and protection against oxidative stress: selenoprotein N as a novel player at the crossroads of redox signaling and calcium homeostasis." Antioxid Redox Signal 12(7): 893-904. |
|
Arbogast, S., M. Beuvin, B. Fraysse, H. Zhou, F. Muntoni and A. Ferreiro (2009). "Oxidative stress in SEPN1-related myopathy: from pathophysiology to treatment." Ann Neurol 65(6): 677-686. |
|
Aschner, M., T. Syversen, D. O. Souza and J. B. Rocha (2006). "Metallothioneins: mercury species-specific induction and their potential role in attenuating neurotoxicity." Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 231(9): 1468-1473. |
|
Borchert, A., C. C. Wang, C. Ufer, H. Schiebel, N. E. Savaskan and H. Kuhn (2006). "The role of phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase isoforms in murine embryogenesis." J Biol Chem 281(28): 19655-19664. |
|
Branco, V., J. Canario, J. Lu, A. Holmgren and C. Carvalho (2012). "Mercury and selenium interaction in vivo: effects on thioredoxin reductase and glutathione peroxidase." Free Radic Biol Med 52(4): 781-793. |
|
Branco, V., J. Canario, J. Lu, A. Holmgren and C. Carvalho (2012). "Mercury and selenium interaction in vivo: effects on thioredoxin reductase and glutathione peroxidase." Free Radic Biol Med 52(4): 781-793. |
|
Branco, V., L. Coppo, S. Sola, J. Lu, C. M. P. Rodrigues, A. Holmgren and C. Carvalho (2017). "Impaired cross-talk between the thioredoxin and glutathione systems is related to ASK-1 mediated apoptosis in neuronal cells exposed to mercury." Redox Biol 13: 278-287. |
|
Burk, R. F., G. E. Olson, K. E. Hill, V. P. Winfrey, A. K. Motley and S. Kurokawa (2013). "Maternal-fetal transfer of selenium in the mouse." FASEB J 27(8): 3249-3256. |
|
Byrns, C. N., M. W. Pitts, C. A. Gilman, A. C. Hashimoto and M. J. Berry (2014). "Mice lacking selenoprotein P and selenocysteine lyase exhibit severe neurological dysfunction, neurodegeneration, and audiogenic seizures." J Biol Chem 289(14): 9662-9674. |
|
Caballero, B., N. Olguin, F. Campos, M. Farina, F. Ballester, M. J. Lopez-Espinosa, S. Llop, E. Rodriguez-Farre and C. Sunol (2017). "Methylmercury-induced developmental toxicity is associated with oxidative stress and cofilin phosphorylation. Cellular and human studies." Neurotoxicology 59: 197-209. |
|
Cabungcal, J. H., D. Nicolas, R. Kraftsik, M. Cuenod, K. Q. Do and J. P. Hornung (2006). "Glutathione deficit during development induces anomalies in the rat anterior cingulate GABAergic neurons: Relevance to schizophrenia." Neurobiol Dis 22(3): 624-637. |
|
Carvalho, C. M., E. H. Chew, S. I. Hashemy, J. Lu and A. Holmgren (2008). "Inhibition of the human thioredoxin system. A molecular mechanism of mercury toxicity." J Biol Chem 283(18): 11913-11923. |
|
Chen, L., R. Na, M. Gu, A. Richardson and Q. Ran (2008). "Lipid peroxidation up-regulates BACE1 expression in vivo: a possible early event of amyloidogenesis in Alzheimer's disease." J Neurochem 107(1): 197-207. |
|
Crack, P. J., J. M. Taylor, N. J. Flentjar, J. de Haan, P. Hertzog, R. C. Iannello and I. Kola (2001). "Increased infarct size and exacerbated apoptosis in the glutathione peroxidase-1 (Gpx-1) knockout mouse brain in response to ischemia/reperfusion injury." J Neurochem 78(6): 1389-1399. |
|
Crack, P. J., K. Cimdins, U. Ali, P. J. Hertzog and R. C. Iannello (2006). "Lack of glutathione peroxidase-1 exacerbates Abeta-mediated neurotoxicity in cortical neurons." J Neural Transm (Vienna) 113(5): 645-657. |
|
Deepmala, J., M. Deepak, S. Srivastav, S. Sangeeta, S. A. Kumar and S. S. Kumar (2013). "Protective effect of combined therapy with dithiothreitol, zinc and selenium protects acute mercury induced oxidative injury in rats." J Trace Elem Med Biol 27(3): 249-256. |
|
Dringen, R. (2000). "Metabolism and functions of glutathione in brain." Prog Neurobiol 62(6): 649-671. |
|
Du, S., J. Zhou, Y. Jia and K. Huang (2010). "SelK is a novel ER stress-regulated protein and protects HepG2 cells from ER stress agent-induced apoptosis." Arch Biochem Biophys 502(2): 137-143. |
|
Farina, M., F. Campos, I. Vendrell, J. Berenguer, M. Barzi, S. Pons and C. Sunol (2009). "Probucol increases glutathione peroxidase-1 activity and displays long-lasting protection against methylmercury toxicity in cerebellar granule cells." Toxicol Sci 112(2): 416-426. |
|
Farina, M., M. Aschner and J. B. Rocha (2011). "Oxidative stress in MeHg-induced neurotoxicity." Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 256(3): 405-417. |
|
Fernandes, A. C., P. M. Filipe, J. P. Freitas and C. F. Manso (1996). "Different effects of thiol and nonthiol ace inhibitors on copper-induced lipid and protein oxidative modification." Free Radic Biol Med 20(4): 507-514. |
|
Ferreiro, A., S. Quijano-Roy, C. Pichereau, B. Moghadaszadeh, N. Goemans, C. Bonnemann, H. Jungbluth, V. Straub, M. Villanova, J. P. Leroy, N. B. Romero, J. J. Martin, F. Muntoni, T. Voit, B. Estournet, P. Richard, M. Fardeau and P. Guicheney (2002). "Mutations of the selenoprotein N gene, which is implicated in rigid spine muscular dystrophy, cause the classical phenotype of multiminicore disease: reassessing the nosology of early-onset myopathies." Am J Hum Genet 71(4): 739-749. |
|
Flentjar, N. J., P. J. Crack, R. Boyd, M. Malin, J. B. de Haan, P. Hertzog, I. Kola and R. Iannello (2002). "Mice lacking glutathione peroxidase-1 activity show increased TUNEL staining and an accelerated inflammatory response in brain following a cold-induced injury." Exp Neurol 177(1): 9-20. |
|
Fradejas, N., C. Serrano-Perez Mdel, P. Tranque and S. Calvo (2011). "Selenoprotein S expression in reactive astrocytes following brain injury." Glia 59(6): 959-972. |
|
Fradejas, N., M. D. Pastor, S. Mora-Lee, P. Tranque and S. Calvo (2008). "SEPS1 gene is activated during astrocyte ischemia and shows prominent antiapoptotic effects." J Mol Neurosci 35(3): 259-265. Franco JL, Teixeira A, Meotti FC, Ribas CM, Stringari J, Garcia Pomblum SC, Moro AM, Bohrer D, Bairros AV, Dafre AL, et al: Cerebellar thiol status and motor deficit after lactational exposure to methylmercury. Environ Res 2006, 102:22-28. |
|
Franco, J. L., T. Posser, P. R. Dunkley, P. W. Dickson, J. J. Mattos, R. Martins, A. C. Bainy, M. R. Marques, A. L. Dafre and M. Farina (2009). "Methylmercury neurotoxicity is associated with inhibition of the antioxidant enzyme glutathione peroxidase." Free Radic Biol Med 47(4): 449-457. |
|
Fujimura, M. and F. Usuki (2017). "In situ different antioxidative systems contribute to the site-specific methylmercury neurotoxicity in mice." Toxicology 392: 55-63. |
|
Gao, Y., J. Pagnon, H. C. Feng, N. Konstantopolous, J. B. Jowett, K. Walder and G. R. Collier (2007). "Secretion of the glucose-regulated selenoprotein SEPS1 from hepatoma cells." Biochem Biophys Res Commun 356(3): 636-641. Gatti, R., Belletti, S., Uggeri, J., Vettori, M.V., Mutti, A., Scandroglio, R., Orlandini, G. Methylmercury cytotoxicity in PC12 cells is mediated by primary glutathione depletion independent of excess reactive oxygen species generation (2004) Toxicology, 204 (2-3), pp. 175-185. |
|
Gladyshev, V. N., K. T. Jeang and T. C. Stadtman (1996). "Selenocysteine, identified as the penultimate C-terminal residue in human T-cell thioredoxin reductase, corresponds to TGA in the human placental gene." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93(12): 6146-6151. |
|
Glaser, V., B. Moritz, A. Schmitz, A. L. Dafre, E. M. Nazari, Y. M. Rauh Muller, L. Feksa, M. R. Straliottoa, A. F. de Bem, M. Farina, J. B. da Rocha and A. Latini (2013). "Protective effects of diphenyl diselenide in a mouse model of brain toxicity." Chem Biol Interact 206(1): 18-26. |
|
Hall, A. G. (1999). "Review: The role of glutathione in the regulation of apoptosis." Eur J Clin Invest 29(3): 238-245. |
|
Hanschmann, E. M., J. R. Godoy, C. Berndt, C. Hudemann and C. H. Lillig (2013). "Thioredoxins, glutaredoxins, and peroxiredoxins--molecular mechanisms and health significance: from cofactors to antioxidants to redox signaling." Antioxid Redox Signal 19(13): 1539-1605. |
|
Hattori, I., Y. Takagi, H. Nakamura, K. Nozaki, J. Bai, N. Kondo, T. Sugino, M. Nishimura, N. Hashimoto and J. Yodoi (2004). "Intravenous administration of thioredoxin decreases brain damage following transient focal cerebral ischemia in mice." Antioxid Redox Signal 6(1): 81-87. |
|
Higdon, A., A. R. Diers, J. Y. Oh, A. Landar and V. M. Darley-Usmar (2012). "Cell signalling by reactive lipid species: new concepts and molecular mechanisms." Biochem J 442(3): 453-464. |
|
Hill, K. E., J. Zhou, W. J. McMahan, A. K. Motley and R. F. Burk (2004). "Neurological dysfunction occurs in mice with targeted deletion of the selenoprotein P gene." J Nutr 134(1): 157-161. |
|
Hill, K. E., J. Zhou, W. J. McMahan, A. K. Motley, J. F. Atkins, R. F. Gesteland and R. F. Burk (2003). "Deletion of selenoprotein P alters distribution of selenium in the mouse." J Biol Chem 278(16): 13640-13646. |
|
Joshi, D., M. D. Kumar, S. A. Kumar and S. Sangeeta (2014). "Reversal of methylmercury-induced oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, and DNA damage by the treatment of N-acetyl cysteine: a protective approach." J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 33(2): 167-182. |
|
Khan, M. A. and F. Wang (2009). "Mercury-selenium compounds and their toxicological significance: toward a molecular understanding of the mercury-selenium antagonism." Environ Toxicol Chem 28(8): 1567-1577. |
|
Klivenyi, P., O. A. Andreassen, R. J. Ferrante, A. Dedeoglu, G. Mueller, E. Lancelot, M. Bogdanov, J. K. Andersen, D. Jiang and M. F. Beal (2000). "Mice deficient in cellular glutathione peroxidase show increased vulnerability to malonate, 3-nitropropionic acid, and 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridine." J Neurosci 20(1): 1-7. |
|
Kohen, R. and A. Nyska (2002). "Oxidation of biological systems: oxidative stress phenomena, antioxidants, redox reactions, and methods for their quantification." Toxicol Pathol 30(6): 620-650. |
|
Labunskyy, V. M., D. L. Hatfield and V. N. Gladyshev (2014). "Selenoproteins: molecular pathways and physiological roles." Physiol Rev 94(3): 739-777. |
|
Lee, B. C., Z. Peterfi, F. W. Hoffmann, R. E. Moore, A. Kaya, A. Avanesov, L. Tarrago, Y. Zhou, E. Weerapana, D. E. Fomenko, P. R. Hoffmann and V. N. Gladyshev (2013). "MsrB1 and MICALs regulate actin assembly and macrophage function via reversible stereoselective methionine oxidation." Mol Cell 51(3): 397-404. |
|
Lindenau, J., H. Noack, K. Asayama and G. Wolf (1998). "Enhanced cellular glutathione peroxidase immunoreactivity in activated astrocytes and in microglia during excitotoxin induced neurodegeneration." Glia 24(2): 252-256. |
Relationship: 1685: Oxidative Stress leads to Glutamate dyshomeostasis
AOPs Referencing Relationship
| AOP Name | Adjacency | Weight of Evidence | Quantitative Understanding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binding of electrophilic chemicals to SH(thiol)-group of proteins and /or to seleno-proteins during brain development leads to impairment of learning and memory | adjacent | Moderate |
Evidence Supporting Applicability of this Relationship
| Life Stage | Evidence |
|---|---|
| During brain development, adulthood and aging | High |
| Sex | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Unspecific | High |
Key Event Relationship Description
In the central nervous system (CNS), glutamate (Glu) is rapidly taken up at the synaptic cleft to mitigate potential excitotoxicity (Meldrum, 2000). Reuptake is carried out by the electrochemical gradient of Glu across the plasma membrane and is accomplished by Glu transporter proteins, referred to as excitatory amino acid transporters (EAATs). These transporter proteins are predominantly expressed in astrocytes, but they are also be found in other neural cells, such as oligodendrocyte, neuron, and microglia membranes (Danbolt, 2001). Functional Glu transporters are located on cell surface membranes. The activities of these transporters are regulated by a redistribution of these proteins to or from the plasma membrane (Robinson 2002), under the control of several signaling pathways. Five different families of EAATs have been recognized (EAAT1–EAAT5). They vary in Na+ and/or K+ coupling abilities. Their names differ based on the presence of the transporter in human or in other mammals (see Table 1).
|
Transporter (Human) |
Transporter (Mammals) |
Occurrence (Cell) |
|---|---|---|
|
EAAT1 |
GLAST |
Astrocyte, ODC, microglia |
|
EAAT2 |
GLT-1 |
Astrocyte, ODC |
|
EAAT3 |
EAAC1 |
Neuron (somatodendritic), astrocyte (low) |
|
EAAT4 |
EAAT4 |
Purkinje cell |
|
EAAT5 |
EAAT5 |
Müller cell (retina) |
Table 1: Glu transporters in human and mammals and their occurrence in CNS cells. From Rajda et al., 2017
These transporters co-localize with, form physical (co-immunoprecipitable) interactions with, and functionally couple to various 'energy-generating' systems, including the Na(+)/K(+)-ATPase, the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, glycogen metabolizing enzymes, glycolytic enzymes, and mitochondria/mitochondrial proteins. This functional coupling is bi-directional with many of these systems both being regulated by glutamate transport and providing the 'fuel' to support glutamate uptake (Robinson and Jackson, 2016). The Na+ gradient, which depends on Na/K ATPase pump and consequently of ATP production and intracellular levels, provides the energy to move Glu from the outside into the cells, accompanied by two Na+ and an H+ ; at the same time, K+ moves in the opposite direction (Boron and Boulpaep, 2003). Mitochondrial dysfunction leads to a decrease in ATP synthesis, impaired Ca2+ content, and concomitant increase in the levels of ROS and RNS (Beal, 2005). Free radicals, which are electrically unstable, have a central role in several physiological and pathological processes. Both ROS and RNS originate from endogenous and exogenous sources. Mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, peroxisomes, phagocytic cells, and others serve as endogenous sources, and environmental factors, such as alcohol, tobacco, pollution, industrial solvents, pesticides, heavy metals, specified medicines, etc. make up the prepondarance of exogenous factors. Significant amounts of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS,) are formed during oxidative phosphorylation, when the greatest amount of ATP is produced. Cellular antioxidants production serves as a countermeasure against this process (Su et al., 2013; Szalardi et al., 2015). Most cells, including astrocytes, have protective mechanisms against ROS, predominantly in the form of the tripeptide thiol, glutathione (GSH) (Hsie et al., 1996). This process stays in a highly sensitive balance. In the specific case when ROS and RNS synthesis exceeds antioxidant synthesis it results in oxidative stress (Reddy, 2006; Ghafouribar et al., 2008; Su et al., 2013; Szalardi et al., 2015; Valko et al., 2007; Yankovskaya et al., 2003; Senoo-Matsuda et al., 2003; Schon and Manfredi, 2003).
Evidence Supporting this KER
Biological PlausibilityDue to the tight coupling of Glu transporters with energy production, and to the important role of Glu transporters in Glu homeostasis, perturbations of energy metabolism such as mitochondrial dysfunction and increased production of ROS lead to Glu dyshomeostasis (Boron and Boulpaep, 2003). In particular, it was shown that ROS inhibit glutamate uptake by astrocytes (Sorg et al., 1997), and that glutamate release is mediated by ROS-activated volume-sensitive outwardly rectifying anion channels (Liu et al., 2009).
Empirical EvidencePorciuncula et al., (2003). Methylmercury (2-10 mM) inhibits glutamate uptake in synaptic vesicles isolated from rat brain in a concentration-dependent manner (with LD50 at 50 mM). It also inhibits the H+-ATPase activity in a concentration-dependent manner with similar LD50. This suggests that the vesicular glutamate uptake is impaired by methylmercury and that this effect involves the H+-ATPase.
Roos et al., (2009). Methylmercury induced ROS production in rat brain cortical slices after 2h exposure at 100 and 200 mM and after 5h exposure at 50 mM. Guanosine (0.5 - 5 mM), ebselen (1-5 mM) and diphenyl diselenide (1-5 mM) blocked the methylmercury-induced ROS production. The inhibitor of NMDA receptors, MK801 (50 mM) equally blocked the methylmercury-induced ROS production by two potential mechanisms of action: (i) mercury by affecting mitochondria iincreased ROS formation, which decrease glutamate uptake and consequently increased extracellular glutamate acting on NMDA receptors; (ii) The ROS formation is secondary to overstimulation of NMDA receptors, due to mercury-induced decrease in glutamate uptake.
Roos et al., (2011). Experiments performed in isolated mitochondria from rat liver slices showed that methylmercury (25 mM) increased ROS production (measured by dichlorofluoroscein). Methionine treatment (50-250 mM) was effective in reducing ROS formation.
Juarez et al., (2002) Microdialysis probe in adult Wistar rats showed that acute exposure to methylmercury (10, 100 mM) induced an increase release of extracellular glutamate (9.8 fold at 10 mM and 2.4 fold at 100 mM). This extracellular glutamate level remained elevated at least 90 min following methylmercury exposure.
Allen et al., (2001). Cerebral cortical astrocytes were treated with methylmercury (1 mM for 24h or 10 mM for 30 min) and loaded with [U-13C] glutamate. In the methylmercruy-treated group, a decrease of [U-13C] lactate was observed. This lactate can only be derived from mitochondrial metabolism, via the tricarboxylic acid, showing a link between mitochondrial dysfunction and glutamate metabolism. In addition, the decreased lactate production might be detrimental to surrounding cells, since lactate has been shown to be an important substrate for neurons.
Uncertainties and InconsistenciesThe astrocytic enzyme glutamine synthetase (GS), transforming glutamate in glutamine, which is taken up by neurons, is also a SH-containing protein, which is inhibited by mercury binding (Kwon and Park, 2003). This participate to glutamate dyshomeostasis linking this KE directly to the MIE.
References
Allen, J. W., H. El-Oqayli, M. Aschner, T. Syversen and U. Sonnewald (2001). "Methylmercury has a selective effect on mitochondria in cultured astrocytes in the presence of [U-(13)C]glutamate." Brain Res 908(2): 149-154.
Bergles DE, Diamond JS, Jahr CE. Clearance of glutamate inside the synapse and beyond. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999;9:293–298.
Beal M.F. Mitochondria take center stage in aging and neurodegeneration. Ann. Neurol. 2005;58:495–505.
Berry JD, Shefner JM, Conwit R, Schoenfeld D, Keroack M, Felsenstein D, Krivickas L, David WS, Vriesendorp F, Pestronk A, et al. Design and initial results of a multi-phase randomized trial of ceftriaxone in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e61177.
Boron WF, Boulpaep EL. 2003. A cellular and molecular approach. Medical Physiology. Updated Edition. Elsevier, Saunders.
Casado M, Bendahan A, Zafra F, Danbolt NC, Aragón C, Giménez C, Kanner BI. Phosphorylation and modulation of brain glutamate transporters by protein kinase C. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:27313–27317.
Colton CK, Kong Q, Lai L, Zhu MX, Seyb KI, Cuny GD, Xian J, Glicksman MA, Lin C-LG. Identification of translational activators of glial glutamate transporter EAAT2 through cell-based high-throughput screening: an approach to prevent excitotoxicity. J Biomol Screen. 2010;15:653–662.
Danbolt NC. Glutamate uptake. Prog Neurobiol. 2001;65:1–105.
Fontana AC, Beleboni RO, Wojewodzic MW, Dos SWF, Coutinho-Netto J, Grutle NJ, Watts SD, Danbolt NC, Amara SG. Enhancing glutamate transport: mechanism of action of Parawixin1, a neuroprotective compound from Parawixia bistriata spider venom. Mol Pharmacol. 2007;72:1228–1237.
Ghafourifar P., Mousavizadeh K., Parihar M.S., Nazarewicz R.R., Parihar A., Zenebe W.J. 2008. Mitochondria in multiple sclerosis. Front. Biosci. 13:3116–3126. doi: 10.2741/2913.
Gonzalez MI, Robinson MB. Neurotransmitter transporters: why dance with so many partners? Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2004;4:30–35.
Hediger MA. Glutamate transporters in kidney and brain. Am J Physiol. 1999;277:F487–F492.
Juarez, B. I., M. L. Martinez, M. Montante, L. Dufour, E. Garcia and M. E. Jimenez-Capdeville (2002). "Methylmercury increases glutamate extracellular levels in frontal cortex of awake rats." Neurotoxicol Teratol 24(6): 767-771.
Kwon, O.-S., Park, Y.-J. In vitro and in vivo dose-dependent inhibition of methylmercury on glutamine synthetase in the brain of different species (2003) Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 14 (1-2), pp. 17-24.
Liu HT, Akita T, Shimizu T, Sabirov RZ, Okada Y. 2009. Bradykinin-induced astrocyte–neuron signalling: glutamate release is mediated by ROS-activated volume-sensitive outwardly rectifying anion channels. J Physiol. 587(Pt 10): 2197–2209.
Meldrum BS. 2000. Glutamate as a neurotransmitter in the brain: review of physiology and pathology. J. Nutr. 130(4S Suppl):1007S–1015S.
Mitrovic AD, Plesko F, Vandenberg RJ. Zn2+inhibits the anion conductance of the glutamate transporter EAAT4. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:26071–26076.
Porciuncula, L. O., J. B. Rocha, R. G. Tavares, G. Ghisleni, M. Reis and D. O. Souza (2003). "Methylmercury inhibits glutamate uptake by synaptic vesicles from rat brain." Neuroreport 14(4): 577-580.
Rajda C, Pukoli D, Bende Z, Majalath Z, Vécsei L. 2017. Excitotoxins, Mitochondrial and Redox Disturbances in Multiple Sclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Feb; 18(2): 353. doi: 10.3390/ijms18020353.
Reddy P.H. 2006. Mitochondrial oxidative damage in aging and Alzheimer’s disease: Implications for mitochondrially targeted antioxidant therapeutics. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. doi: 10.1155/JBB/2006/31372.
Robinson MB. 2002. Regulated trafficking of neurotransmitter transporters: common notes but different melodies. J Neurochem. 80(1):1-11.
Robinson, M. B. and J. G. Jackson (2016). "Astroglial glutamate transporters coordinate excitatory signaling and brain energetics." Neurochem Int 98: 56-71.
Roos, D. H., R. L. Puntel, M. M. Santos, D. O. Souza, M. Farina, C. W. Nogueira, M. Aschner, M. E. Burger, N. B. Barbosa and J. B. Rocha (2009). "Guanosine and synthetic organoselenium compounds modulate methylmercury-induced oxidative stress in rat brain cortical slices: involvement of oxidative stress and glutamatergic system." Toxicol In Vitro 23(2): 302-307.
Roos, D. H., R. L. Puntel, M. Farina, M. Aschner, D. Bohrer, J. B. Rocha and N. B. de Vargas Barbosa (2011). "Modulation of methylmercury uptake by methionine: prevention of mitochondrial dysfunction in rat liver slices by a mimicry mechanism." Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 252(1): 28-35.
Rothstein JD, Patel S, Regan MR, Haenggeli C, Huang YH, Bergles DE, Jin L, Dykes Hoberg M, Vidensky S, Chung DS, Toan SV, Bruijn LI, Su ZZ, Gupta P, Fisher PB. Beta-lactam antibiotics offer neuroprotection by increasing glutamate transporter expression. Nature. 2005;433:73–77.
Sattler R, Rothstein JD. Regulation and dysregulation of glutamate transporters. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2006;175:277–303
Seal RP, Amara SG. Excitatory amino acid transporters: a family in flux. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1999;39:431–456.
Senoo-Matsuda N., Hartman P.S., Akatsuka A., Yoshimura S., Ishii N. 2003. A complex II defect affects mitochondrial structure, leading to ced-3- and ced-4-dependent apoptosis and aging. J. Biol. Chem. 278:22031–22036. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211377200.
Schon E.A., Manfredi G. 2003. Neuronal degeneration and mitochondrial dysfunction. J. Clin Investig. 111:303–312. doi: 10.1172/JCI200317741.
Sorg O, Horn TF, Yu N, Gruol DL, Bloom FE. 1997.Inhibition of astrocyte glutamate uptake by reactive oxygen species: role of antioxidant enzymes.Mol Med. 3(7): 431–440.
Su K., Bourdette D., Forte M. 2013. Mitochondrial dysfunction and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis. Front. Physiol. 4:169. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00169.
Szalárdy L., Zádori D., Klivényi P., Toldi J., Vécsei L. 2015. Electron transport disturbances and neurodegeneration: From albert Szent-Györgyi’s concept (Szeged) till novel approaches to boost mitochondrial bioenergetics. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2015:498401. doi: 10.1155/2015/498401.
Valko M., Leibfritz D., Moncol J., Cronin M.T., Mazur M., Telser J. 2007. Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 39:44–84. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2006.07.001.
Vandenberg RJ, Mitrovic AD, Johnston GA. Molecular basis for differential inhibition of glutamate transporter subtypes by zinc ions. Mol Pharmacol. 1998;54:189–196.
Vandenberg RJ, Ryan RM. Mechanisms of glutamate transport. Physiol Rev. 2013;93:1621–1657.
Xing X, Chang L-C, Kong Q, Colton CK, Lai L, Glicksman MA, Lin C-LG, Cuny GD. Structure-activity relationship study of pyridazine derivatives as glutamate transporter EAAT2 activators. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2011;21:5774–5777.
Yankovskaya V., Horsefield R., Törnroth S., Luna-Chavez C., Miyoshi H., Léger C., Byrne B., Cecchini G., Iwata S. 2003. Architecture of succinate dehydrogenase and reactive oxygen species generation. Science.299:700–704. doi: 10.1126/science.1079605.
Relationship: 1686: Glutamate dyshomeostasis leads to N/A, Cell injury/death
AOPs Referencing Relationship
| AOP Name | Adjacency | Weight of Evidence | Quantitative Understanding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binding of electrophilic chemicals to SH(thiol)-group of proteins and /or to seleno-proteins during brain development leads to impairment of learning and memory | adjacent | High |
Evidence Supporting Applicability of this Relationship
| Life Stage | Evidence |
|---|---|
| During brain development, adulthood and aging | High |
| Sex | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Unspecific | High |
Support for the link between glutamate dyshomeostasis and cell injury /death can be found in rats, and mouse. However, as the neurotransmitter glutamate is already found in insects, it is plausible that this KER is valid throughout taxa (Harris, 2014).
Key Event Relationship Description
Glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian CNS, where it plays key roles in development, learning, memory and response to injury. However, glutamate at high concentrations at the synaptic cleft acts as a toxin, inducing neuronal injury and death (Meldrum, 2000; Ozawa et al., 1998). Glutamate-mediated neurotoxicity has been dubbed as “excitotoxicity”, referring to the consequence of the overactivation of the N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA)–type glutamate receptors (cf AOP 48), leading to increased Na+ and Ca2+ influx into neurons (Choi, 1992; Pivovarova & Andrews, 2010). Increased intracellular Ca2+ levels are associated with the generation of oxidative stress and neurotoxicity (Lafon-Cazal, 1993). Accordingly, the control of extracellular levels of glutamate dictates its physiological/pathological actions and this equilibrium is maintained primarily by the action of several glutamate transporters (such as GLAST, GLT1, and EAAC1) located on astrocytic cell membranes, which remove the excitatory neurotransmitter from the synaptic cleft, keeping its extracellular concentrations below toxic levels (Anderson and Swanson, 2000; Maragakis and Rothstein, 2001; Szydlowska & Tymianski, 2010).
In addition to synaptic transmission, physiological stimulation of glutamate receptors can mediate trophic effects and promote neuronal plasticity. During development, NMDA receptors initiate a cascade of signal transduction events and gene expression changes primarily involving Ca2+-mediated signaling, induced by activation of either Ca2+- permeable receptor channels or voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels. The consecutive activation of major protein kinase signaling pathways, such as Ras-MAPK/ERK and PI3-K-Akt, contributes to regulation of gene expression through the activation of key transcription factors, such as CREB, SRF, MEF-2, NF-kappaB. Metabotropic glutamate receptors can also engage these signaling pathways, in part by transactivating receptor tyrosine kinases. Indirect effects of glutamate receptor stimulation are due to the release of neurotrophic factors, such as brain derived neurotrophic factor through glutamate-induced release of trophic factors from glia. The trophic effect of glutamate receptor activation is developmental stage-dependent and may play an important role in determining the selective survival of neurons that made proper connections. During this sensitive developmental period, interference with glutamate receptor function may lead to widespread neuronal loss (for review, Balazs, 2006).
Evidence Supporting this KER
Biological PlausibilityGlutamate dyshomeostasis and in particular excess of glutamate in the synaptic cleft will lead to overactivation of ionotropic glutamate receptors and cause cell injury/death, as described in AOP 48. The excess of glutamate can result from decreased uptake in astrocytes (Brookes and Kristt, 1989; Aschner et al., 2000), or neurons (Porciuncula et al., 2003; Moretto et al., 2005). But also from the increased release (Reynolds and Raecz, 1987). This neurotoxic cascade involves calcium overload and ROS production leading to oxidative stress (Meldrum, 2000; Ozawa et al., 1998;Lafon-Cazal, 1993; Ceccatelli et al., 2010). Chemicals binding to sulfhydryl (SH)-/seleno-proteins cause a direct oxidative stress by perturbing mitochondrial respiratory chain proteins and by decreasing anti-oxidant defense mechanism (see KER : MIE to KEdown oxidative stress) and an indirect oxidative stress via perturbation of glutamate homeostasis/excitotoxicity. Thus, there may be some redundancy in the empirical support between this KER and the KER linking KEup oxidative stress and KEdown cell injury/death.
Glutamate has been shown to regulate BDNF production (Tao, 1998, 2002). Accordingly, glutamate may also indirectly contribute to cell injury/death by inducing modifications in the brain levels of trophic factors, since it is known that changes in trophic support can lead to cell injury/death, as well as to perturbation in the physiological establishment of neuronal network (for review, Zhao, 2017).
Empirical Evidence
|
KEup Glutamate dyshomeostasis |
KEdown Cell injury/death |
species; developmental stage of exposure to stressor |
Stressor |
Dose or conc. Duration |
Protective/ aggravating evidence |
Reference |
|
Dose-dependent increase in glutamate content in cerebral cortex (+ 60% at 12 µmol kg-1)
|
Increased apoptosis rate measured by flow cytometry (+ 1100% at 12 µmol kg-1)
|
Rat adult exposure |
MeHgCl |
4 µmol kg-1 12 µmol kg-1 i.p injection 5 injections per week during 4 weeks |
Pretreatment with dextro-methorphan (low-affinity, noncompetitive NMDAR antagonist) partially decreased Glu content and apoptosis induced by MeHgCl |
Feng, 2014 |
|
Dose-dependent increase in glutamate content in cerebral cortex (+ 22% at 12 µmol kg-1)
|
Increased apoptosis rate measured by flow cytometry (+ 850% at 12 µmol kg-1)
|
Rat adult exposure |
MeHgCl |
4 µmol kg-1 12 µmol kg-1 i.p injection 5 injections per week during 4 weeks |
Pretreatment with memantine (low-affinity, noncompetitive NMDAR antagonist) partially decreased Glu content and apoptosis induced by MeHgCl |
Liu, 2013 |
|
Increase in glutamate content in cerebral cortex (1.12 fold at 12 µmol kg-1)
|
Increased apoptosis rate measured by flow cytometry (+ 630% at 12 µmol kg-1)
|
Rat adult exposure |
MeHgCl |
4 µmol kg-1 12 µmol kg-1 i.p injection 5 injections per week during 4 weeks |
Pretreatment with MK801 (noncompetitive NMDAR antagonist) partially decreased apoptosis induced by MeHgCl |
Xu, 2012 |
|
Decreased glutamine uptake |
Reduction in inner mitochondrial membrane potential |
Rat astrocyte cultures |
MeHg |
1, 5, 10 µM 1 and 5 min |
|
Yin, 2007 |
|
Changes in intracellular glutamate concentration |
Cell death measured by MTT reduction and LDH release |
Mouse astrocytes, neurons in mono- or co-cultures |
MeHg |
1-50 µM 24h |
|
Morken, 2005 |
|
Concentration-dependent inhibition of glutamate uptake and stimulation of glutamate release |
Cell death measured by MTT reduction |
Mouse cerebellar granule cells in culture |
HgCl2 MeHgCl |
10-7-10-4 M 10 min |
|
Fonfria, 2005 |
|
Increased brain extracellular glutamate measured by microdyalisis |
|
Rat adult exposure |
MeHg 10, 100 µM 3-5 h |
|
|
Juarez, 2002 |
|
Decreased glutamate uptake (-46%) |
|
Rat astrocyte cultures |
HgCl2 |
5 µM 5 min |
|
Albrecht, 1993 |
|
Decreased synaptosomal glutamate released
|
|
Rat adult exposure |
Acrylamide
|
50 mg kg-1 8 days 21 mg kg-1 21 days p.o.
|
|
LoPachin, 2004 |
|
Dose-dependent decreased cortical glutamate concentration |
Dose-dependent abnormal neuronal morphology |
Rat Young (3-4 weeks) |
Acrylamide
|
5, 15, 30 mg kg-1 5 injections per week during 4 weeks gavage |
|
Tian, 2015 |
|
Concentration-dependent decrease in glutamate uptake |
Time- and concentration-dependent decrease in cell viability, measured by cell counting and LDH release |
Rat astrocytes, neurons in mono-cultures |
Acrolein |
0.25 – 25 µM 3, 6, 12, 24h |
|
Lovell, 2000 |
Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
No uncertainty or inconsistency reported yet.
References
Albrecht, J., Talbot, M., Kimelberg, H.K., Aschner, M., 1993. The role of sulfhydryl groups and calcium in the mercuric chloride-induced inhibition of glutamate uptake in rat primary astrocyte cultures. Brain Res 607, 249-254.
Anderson, C.M., Swanson, R.A., 2000. Astrocyte glutamate transport: review of properties, regulation, and physiological functions. Glia 32, 1-14.
Aschner, M., Yao, C.P., Allen, J.W., Tan, K.H., 2000. Methylmercury alters glutamate transport in astrocytes. Neurochem Int 37, 199-206.
Balazs, R., 2006. Trophic effect of glutamate. Curr Top Med Chem 6, 961-968.
Brookes, N., Kristt, D.A., 1989. Inhibition of amino acid transport and protein synthesis by HgCl2 and methylmercury in astrocytes: selectivity and reversibility. J Neurochem 53, 1228-1237.
Ceccatelli, S., Dare, E., Moors, M., 2010. Methylmercury-induced neurotoxicity and apoptosis. Chem Biol Interact 188, 301-308.
Choi, D.W., 1992. Excitotoxic cell death. J Neurobiol 23, 1261-1276.
Feng, S., Xu, Z., Liu, W., Li, Y., Deng, Y., Xu, B., 2014. Preventive effects of dextromethorphan on methylmercury-induced glutamate dyshomeostasis and oxidative damage in rat cerebral cortex. Biol Trace Elem Res 159, 332-345.
Fonfria, E., Vilaro, M.T., Babot, Z., Rodriguez-Farre, E., Sunol, C., 2005. Mercury compounds disrupt neuronal glutamate transport in cultured mouse cerebellar granule cells. J Neurosci Res 79, 545-553.
Harris, K.D., Weiss, M., Zahavi, A., 2014. Why are neurotransmitters neurotoxic? An evolutionary perspective. F1000Res 3, 179.
Juarez, B.I., Martinez, M.L., Montante, M., Dufour, L., Garcia, E., Jimenez-Capdeville, M.E., 2002. Methylmercury increases glutamate extracellular levels in frontal cortex of awake rats. Neurotoxicol Teratol 24, 767-771.
Lafon-Cazal, M., Pietri, S., Culcasi, M., Bockaert, J., 1993. NMDA-dependent superoxide production and neurotoxicity. Nature 364, 535-537.
Liu, W., Xu, Z., Deng, Y., Xu, B., Wei, Y., Yang, T., 2013. Protective effects of memantine against methylmercury-induced glutamate dyshomeostasis and oxidative stress in rat cerebral cortex. Neurotox Res 24, 320-337.
LoPachin, R.M., Schwarcz, A.I., Gaughan, C.L., Mansukhani, S., Das, S., 2004. In vivo and in vitro effects of acrylamide on synaptosomal neurotransmitter uptake and release. Neurotoxicology 25, 349-363.
Lovell, M.A., Xie, C., Markesbery, W.R., 2000. Acrolein, a product of lipid peroxidation, inhibits glucose and glutamate uptake in primary neuronal cultures. Free Radic Biol Med 29, 714-720.
Maragakis, N.J., Rothstein, J.D., 2001. Glutamate transporters in neurologic disease. Arch Neurol 58, 365-370
Meldrum, B.S., 2000. Glutamate as a neurotransmitter in the brain: review of physiology and pathology. J Nutr 130, 1007S-1015S.
Moretto, M.B., Funchal, C., Santos, A.Q., Gottfried, C., Boff, B., Zeni, G., Pureur, R.P., Souza, D.O., Wofchuk, S., Rocha, J.B., 2005. Ebselen protects glutamate uptake inhibition caused by methyl mercury but does not by Hg2+. Toxicology 214, 57-66.
Morken, T.S., Sonnewald, U., Aschner, M., Syversen, T., 2005. Effects of methylmercury on primary brain cells in mono- and co-culture. Toxicol Sci 87, 169-175.
Ozawa, S., Kamiya, H., Tsuzuki, K., 1998. Glutamate receptors in the mammalian central nervous system. Prog Neurobiol 54, 581-618.
Pivovarova, N.B., Andrews, S.B., 2010. Calcium-dependent mitochondrial function and dysfunction in neurons. FEBS J 277, 3622-3636.
Porciuncula, L.O., Rocha, J.B., Tavares, R.G., Ghisleni, G., Reis, M., Souza, D.O., 2003. Methylmercury inhibits glutamate uptake by synaptic vesicles from rat brain. Neuroreport 14, 577-580.
Reynolds, J.N., Racz, W.J., 1987. Effects of methylmercury on the spontaneous and potassium-evoked release of endogenous amino acids from mouse cerebellar slices. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 65, 791-798.
Szydlowska, K., Tymianski, M., 2010. Calcium, ischemia and excitotoxicity. Cell Calcium 47, 122-129.
Tao, X., West, A.E., Chen, W.G., Corfas, G., Greenberg, M.E., 2002. A calcium-responsive transcription factor, CaRF, that regulates neuronal activity-dependent expression of BDNF. Neuron 33, 383-395.
Tian, S.M., Ma, Y.X., Shi, J., Lou, T.Y., Liu, S.S., Li, G.Y., 2015. Acrylamide neurotoxicity on the cerebrum of weaning rats. Neural Regen Res 10, 938-943.
Xu, B., Xu, Z.F., Deng, Y., Liu, W., Yang, H.B., Wei, Y.G., 2012. Protective effects of MK-801 on methylmercury-induced neuronal injury in rat cerebral cortex: involvement of oxidative stress and glutamate metabolism dysfunction. Toxicology 300, 112-120.
Yin, Z., Milatovic, D., Aschner, J.L., Syversen, T., Rocha, J.B., Souza, D.O., Sidoryk, M., Albrecht, J., Aschner, M., 2007. Methylmercury induces oxidative injury, alterations in permeability and glutamine transport in cultured astrocytes. Brain Res 1131, 1-10.
Zhao, H., Alam, A., San, C.Y., Eguchi, S., Chen, Q., Lian, Q., Ma, D., 2017. Molecular mechanisms of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in neuro-protection: Recent developments. Brain Res 1665, 1-21.
Relationship: 365: N/A, Cell injury/death leads to N/A, Neuroinflammation
AOPs Referencing Relationship
Evidence Supporting Applicability of this Relationship
| Life Stage | Evidence |
|---|---|
| During brain development, adulthood and aging | High |
| Sex | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Unspecific | High |
California sea lions that have been exposed to the marine biotoxin DomA developed an acute or chronic toxicosis marked by seizures, whereas histopathological analysis revealed neuroinflammation characterised by gliosis (Kirkley et al., 2014).
Key Event Relationship Description
The pioneering work of Kreutzberg and coworkers (1995, 1996) has shown that neuronal injury leads to neuroinflammation, with microglia and astrocyte reactivities. Several chemokines and chemokines receptors (fraktalkine, CD200) control the neuron-microglia interactions, and a loss of this control can trigger microglial reactivity (Blank and Prinz, 2013; Chapman et al., 2000; Streit et al., 2001). Upon injury causing neuronal death (mainly necrotic), signals termed Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs) are released by damaged neurons and promote microglial reactivity (Marin-Teva et al., 2011; Katsumoto et al., 2014). Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are pattern-recognition receptors that recognize specific pathogen- and danger-associated molecular signatures (PAMPs and DAMPs) and subsequently initiate inflammatory and immune responses. Microglial cells express TLRs, mainly TLR-2, which can detect neuronal cell death (for review, see Hayward and Lee, 2014). TLR-2 functions as a master sentry receptor to detect neuronal death and tissue damage in many different neurological conditions including nerve trans-section injury, traumatic brain injury and hippocampal excitotoxicity (Hayward and Lee, 2014). Astrocytes, the other cellular mediator of neuroinflammation (Ranshoff and Brown, 2012) are also able to sense tissue injury via TLR-3 (Farina et al., 2007; Rossi, 2015).
Evidence Supporting this KER
Biological PlausibilityIt is widely accepted that cell/neuronal injury and death lead to neuroinflammation (microglial and astrocyte reactivities) in adult brain. In the developing brain, neuroinflammation was observed after neurodegeneration induced by excitotoxic lesions (Acarin et al., 1997; Dommergues et al., 2003) or after ethanol exposure (Tiwari et al., 2012; Ahmad et al., 2016). It is important to note that physiological activation of microglial cells is observed during normal brain development for removal of apoptotic debris (Ashwell 1990, 1991). But exposure to toxicant (ethanol), excitotoxic insults (kainic acid) or traumatic brain injury during development can also induce apoptosis in hippocampus and cerebral cortex, as measured either by TUNEL, BID or caspase 3 upregulation associated to an inflammatory response, as evidenced by increased level of pro- inflammatory cytokines IL-1b, TNF-a, of NO, of p65 NF-kB or of the marker of astrogliosis, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), suggesting that, during brain development, neuroinflammation can also be triggerred by apoptosis induced by several types of insult (Tiwari and Chopra, 2012; Baratz et al., 2015; Mesuret et al., 2014).
Empirical EvidenceInclude consideration of temporal concordance here
Pb
In 3D cultures prepared from fetal rat brain cells exposed to Pb (10-6 - 10-4 M for 10 days), Pb-induced neuronal death was evidenced by a decrease of cholinergic and GABAergic markers associated to a decrease in protein content, and was accompanied by microglial and astrocyte reactivities (Zurich et al., 2002). These effects were more pronounced in immature than in differentiated cultures (Zurich et al., 2002). In adult rats, exposure to 100 ppm of Pb for 8 weeks caused neuronal death, evidenced by an increase in apoptosis (TUNEL) that was associated with microglial reactivity and an increase in IL-1b, TNF-a and i-NOS expression (Liu et al., 2012). Acute exposure to Pb (25 mg/kg, ip, for 3 days) increased GFAP and glutamate synthetase expression with impaiment of glutamate uptake and probable neuronal injury (Struzunska, 2000; Struzunska et al., 2001).
It is interesting to note that glial cells and in particular astrocytes are able to accumulate lead, suggesting that thes cells may be also a primary target of lead neurotoxic effects (Zurich et al., 1998; Lindhal et al., 1999).
Domoic acid
- Astrogliosis is one of the histopathological findings revealed by the assessment of brains derived from patients diagnosed with Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning (ASP) (reviewed in Pulido, 2008). In a reference study, where the brain of a patient after acute DomA intoxication has been examined in great detail gliosis has been detected in the overlying cortex, dorsal and ventral septal nuclei, the secondary olfactory areas and the nucleus accumbens (Cendes et al., 1995). Reactive astrogliosis has also been confirmed in the sixth cortical layer and subjacent white matter in the orbital and lateral basal areas, the first and second temporal gyri, the fusiform gyrus, the parietal parasagittal cortex, and the insula (Cendes et al., 1995).
- Adult rats have been assessed seven days after the administration of DomA (2.25 mg/kg i.p.) and revealed astrocytosis identified by glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-immunostaining and activation of microglia by GSI-B4 histochemistry (Appel et al., 1997). More investigators have suggested that DomA can activate microglia (Ananth et al., 2001; Chandrasekaran et al., 2004).
- DomA treatment (2 mg/kg once a day for 3 weeks) in mice significantly stimulates the expression of inflammatory mediators, including IL-1β (1.7 fold increase), TNF-α (2 fold increase), GFAP (1.4 fold increase), Cox-2 (3 fold increase), and iNOS (1.6 fold increase) compared to controls (Lu et al, 2013).
- Adult female and male mice have been injected i.p. with 4mg/kg (LD50) of DomA and Real-time PCR has been performed in the brain derived at 30, 60 and 240 min post-injection. The inflammatory response element cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) has been found to be 8 fold increased at the 30 and 60 min time points and then showed a descent back toward basal expression levels by 240 min (Ryan et al., 2005).
- Adult male rats treated with 2 mg/kg DomA i.p. have been sacrificed after 3 or 7 d and shown that GFAP and lectin staining could identify regions of reactive gliosis within areas of neurodegeneration but at higher magnifications compared to the ones used for neurodegeneration (Appel et al., 1997; Scallet et al., 2005).
- At 5 days and 3 months following DomA administration of male Wistar rats, a large number of OX-42 positive microglial cells exhibiting intense immunoreactivity in CA1 and CA3 regions of the hippocampus have been detected. With an antibody against GFAP, immunoreactive astrocytes have been found to be sparsely distributed in the hippocampus derived from DomA treated rats after 3 months' time interval (Ananth et al., 2003). At 5 days after the administration of DomA, GFAP positive astrocytes have been found increased in the hippocampus (Ananth et al., 2003).
Mercury
Young mice receiving a fish diet (MeHgCl) for 3 months exhibited in cortex a decrease of the chemokine Ccl2 and neuronal death, as measured by a decrease in cell density, as well as microglial reactivity (increase in Iba1-labelled cells) (Godefroy et al., 2012)
Perinatal exposure to MeHgCl (GD7-PD21, 0.5 mg/kg bw/day in drinking water) lead to a delayed decrease (PD 36) of cholinergic muscarinic receptors in cerebellum accompanied by astrogliosis (Roda et al., 2008).
Immature rat brain cell cultures maintained in 3D conditions were exposed to either MeHgCl or HgCl2 (10-9 – 10-6 M, for 10 days). This treatment caused microglial and astrocyte activation without neuronal death, but a reversible decrease of the expression of the neuronal marker MAP2 (Monnet-Tschudi et al., 1996 ; Eskes et al., 2002).
Adult marmoset exposed acutely to 5 mg Hg/kg/day p.o. exhibited apoptosis in occipital cortex, as well as glial reactivity (GFAP and Iba1 increased). Mercury content in occipital cortex was 31 mg/g (Yamamoto et al., 2012).
Monkeys exposed to MeHgCl (50 mg/bw for 6,12,18 months) showed microglial and astrocyte activation without any change in neuronal number. Both astrocyte and microglia accumulated elevated levels of inorganic mercury, suggesting a direct effect of mercury on glial cells (Charleston et al., 1996).
Human LUHMES cells as model of dopaminergic neurons and the human astrocyte cell line CFF-STTG1 were exposed to MeHgCl (0.25 -5 mM), thiomersal (0.25 – 5 mM) or HgCl2 (5-35 mM), what affected their cell viability. Neurons were much more sensitive than astrocytes (Lohner et al., 2015).
A direct activation of rat primary microglial cells and astrocytes was observed after exposure to MeHgCl (10-10-10-6 M, for 5 days). (Eskes et al., 2002).
Astrocyte + microglia in co-cultures exposed to mercury (1-5 mM for 30 min to 6 days) showed lower levels of GSH in microglia than in astrocytes (Ni et al., 2011 ; 2012).
Human primary astrocyte cell line exposed to MeHgCl (1.125 mM) for 24h and 72h did not exhibit an increase of GFAP, but of NfkB after the 72h (Malfa et al., 2014).
Human mast cells (leukemic LAD2, derived from umbilical cord blood) showed an increase of IL-6 release when exposed to HgCl2 (0.1-10 mM, for 10 min to 24h). It is hypothesized that mast cell activation could lead to BBB disruption and to neuroinflammation. (Kempurai et al., 2010).
Sex dependency
In prairie voles 10 weeks exposure to 600 ppm HgCl2 in drinking water lead to an increase of TNF-a in hippocampus of male, but not in female (Curtis et al., 2011).
Acrylamide (acrylamide is a common food contaminant generated by heat processing)
Adult mice received 10, 20, 30 mg/kg bw for 4 weeks. The dose of 20 mg/kg bw caused neurological symptoms (ex. cognitive impairment) associated to an increased oxidative stress, a decrease of GSH and glial reactivity (GFAP and Iba1 increased) in cortex, hippocampus and striatum. An increase in TNF-a, IL-1b and i-NOS expression in all 3 brain regions was also observed. (Santhanasabepathy et al., 2015)
Isolated and/or co-cultures of microglial cells or astrocytes treated with acrylamide 0-1mM for 24-96h exhibited an increased release of TNF-a, IL-1b, IL-6 and G-CSF, suggesting a direct effect of acrylamide on glial cells (Zhao et al., 2017a,b).
Neonatal rat astrocytes treated with acrylamide (0.1-1mM) for 7, 11, 15, or 20 days increased their proliferation rate as measured by PCNA staining. Astrocyte proliferation is also a sign of reactivity. (Aschner et al., 2005).
Acrolein
Adult rat received an infusion of acrolein (15, 50, 150 nmoles/0.5 ml) directly in substantia nigra which caused a decrease of Tyrosine hydroxylase immunostaining, an increase in caspase 1 and an activation of microglial cells and astrocytes (Wang et al., 2017).
Similar treatment as above induced an increase in lipid peroxidation, of hsp32 and of caspase 1 with an increase in GFAP and in ED1 (marker of macrophagic microglial cells) as well as of IL-1b (Zhao et al., 2017).
Uncertainties and InconsistenciesPb
Sobin and coworkers (2013) described a Pb-induced decrease in dentate gyrus volume associated with microglial reactivity at low dose of Pb (30 ppm), but not at high doses (330 ppm), plausibly due to the death of microglial cells at the high dose of Pb.
Pb decreased IL-6 secretion by isolated astrocytes (Quian et al., 2007). Such a decrease was also observed in isolated astrocytes treated with methylmercury, and was reverted in microglia astrocyte co-cultures, suggesting that cell-cell interactions can modify the response to a toxicant (Eskes et al., 2002). It is interesting to note that glial cells and in particular astrocytes are able to accumulate lead, suggesting that thes cells may be also a primary target of lead neurotoxic effects (Zurich et al., 1998; Lindhal et al., 1999).
Domoic acid
Adult male and female Sprague Dawley rats have received a single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of DomA (0, 1.0, 1.8 mg/kg) and have been sacrificed 3 h after the treatment. Histopathological analysis of these animals has shown no alterations for GFAP immunostaining in the dorsal hippocampus and olfactory bulb, indicating absence of reactive gliosis (Baron et al., 2013).
The exposed zebrafish from the 36-week treatment with DomA showed no neuroinflammation in brain (Hiolski et al., 2014). At the same time, microarray analysis revealed no significant changes in gfap gene expression, a marker of neuroinflammation and astrocyte activation (Hiolski et al., 2014).
Mercury
Mouse developmental exposure to 50 mM of HgCl2 in maternal drinking water from GD8 to PD21 did not induce any change in GM-CSF, IFN-g, IL-1b, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p70. IL-13, IL-17, MCP1, MIP2 and TNF-a measured by Luminex in brain slices of PD21 and PD70. No sex differences, but brain increase of IgG and increased sociability in females (Zhang et al., 2012).
3D rat brain cell cultures treated for 10 days with HgCl2 or MeHgCl (10-10 - 10-6 M) exhibited increased apotosis measured by TUNEL, but exclusively in immature cultures. The proportion of cells undergoing apoptotis was highest for astrocytes than for neurons. But the apoptotic nuclei were not associated with reactive microglial cells as evidenced by double staining (Monnet-Tschudi, 1998).
Acrylamide
A 2 weeks exposure to acrylamide in drinking water (44mg/kg/day) induced behavioral effects, such a decreased in locomotor activity, but with no effect at gene level on neuronal and inflammatory markers analyzed in somatosensory and motor cortex (Bowyer et al., 2009).
References
Acarin L, González B, Castellano B, Castro AJ. 1997. Quantitative analysis of microglial reaction to a cortical excitotoxic lesion in the early postnatal brain. ExpNeurol 147: 410-417.
Ahmad A, Shah SA, Badshah H, Kim MJ, Ali T, Yoon GH, et al. 2016. Neuroprotection by Vitamin C Against Ethanol-Induced Neuroinflammation Associated Neurodegeneration in the Developing Rat Brain. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 15(3): 360-370.
Ananth C, Thameem DS, Gopalakrishnakone P, Kaur C. Domoic acid-induced neuronal damage in the rat hippocampus: changes in apoptosis related genes (bcl-2, bax, caspase-3) and microglial response. J Neurosci Res., 2001, 66: 177-190.
Ananth C, Gopalakrishnakone P, Kaur C. Induction of inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in activated microglia following domoic acid (DA)-induced neurotoxicity in the rat hippocampus. Neurosci Lett., 2003, 338: 49-52.
Appel NM, Rapoport SI, O’Callaghan JP, Bell JM, Freed LM. Sequelae of parenteral domoic acid administration in rats: comparison of effects on different metabolic markers in brain. Brain Res., 1997, 754: 55-64.
Aschner, M., Wu, Q., Friedman, M.A., 2005. Effects of acrylamide on primary neonatal rat astrocyte functions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1053, 444-54.
Ashwell K. 1990. Microglia and cell death in the developing mouse cerebellum. DevBrain Res 55: 219-230.
Ashwell K. 1991. The distribution of microglia and cell death in the fetal rat forebrain. DevBrain Res 58: 1-12.
Baratz R, Tweedie D, Wang JY, Rubovitch V, Luo W, Hoffer BJ, et al. 2015. Transiently lowering tumor necrosis factor-alpha synthesis ameliorates neuronal cell loss and cognitive impairments induced by minimal traumatic brain injury in mice. J Neuroinflammation 12: 45.
Baron AW, Rushton SP, Rens N, Morris CM, Blain PG, Judge SJ. Sex differences in effects of low level domoic acid exposure. Neurotoxicology, 2013, 34: 1-8.
Blank T, Prinz M. Microglia as modulators of cognition and neuropsychiatric disorders. Glia, 2013, 61: 62-70.
Bowyer, J.F., et al., 2009. The mRNA expression and histological integrity in rat forebrain motor and sensory regions are minimally affected by acrylamide exposure through drinking water. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 240, 401-11.
Chandrasekaran A, Ponnambalam G, Kaur C. Domoic acid-induced neurotoxicity in the hippocampus of adult rats. Neurotox Res., 2004, 6:1 05-117.
Chapman GA, Moores K, Harrison D, Campbell CA, Stewart BR, Strijbos PJLM. Fractalkine Cleavage from Neuronal Membrans Represents an Acute Event in Inflammatory Response to Excitotoxic Brain Damage. J Neurosc., 2000, 20 RC87: 1-5.
Charleston JS, Body RL, Bolender RP, Mottet NK, Vahter ME, Burbacher TM: Changes in the number of astrocytes and microglia in the thalamus of the monkey Macaca fascicularis following long-term subclinical methylmercury exposure. NeuroToxicology 1996, 17:127-138.
Cendes F, Andermann F, Carpenter S, Zatorre RJ, Cashman NR. Temporal lobe epilepsy caused by domoic acid intoxication: evidence for glutamate receptor-mediated excitotoxicity in humans. Ann Neurol., 1995, 37: 123-126.
Thomas Curtis, J., et al., 2011. Chronic inorganic mercury exposure induces sex-specific changes in central TNFalpha expression: importance in autism? Neurosci Lett. 504, 40-4.
Dommergues MA, Plaisant F, Verney C, Gressens P. 2003. Early microglial activation following neonatal excitotoxic brain damage in mice: a potential target for neuroprotection. Neuroscience 121(3): 619-628.
Eskes C, Honegger P, Juillerat-Jeanneret L, Monnet-Tschudi F. 2002. Microglial reaction induced by noncytotoxic methylmercury treatment leads to neuroprotection via interactions with astrocytes and IL-6 release. Glia 37(1): 43-52.
Farina C, Aloisi F, Meinl E. Astrocytes are active players in cerebral innate immunity. Trends Immunol, 2007, 28(3): 138-145.
Godefroy, D., et al., 2012. The chemokine CCL2 protects against methylmercury neurotoxicity. Toxicol Sci. 125, 209-18.
Hayward JH, Lee SJ. A Decade of Research on TLR2 Discovering Its Pivotal Role in Glial Activation and Neuroinflammation in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Experimental Neurobiology, 2014, 23(2): 138-147.
Hiolski EM, Kendrick PS, Frame ER, Myers MS, Bammler TK, Beyer RP, Farin FM, Wilkerson HW, Smith DR, Marcinek DJ, Lefebvre KA., Chronic low-level domoic acid exposure alters gene transcription and impairs mitochondrial function in the CNS. Aquat Toxicol., 2014, 155: 151-159.
Katsumoto A, Lu H, Miranda AS, Ransohoff RM. Ontogeny and functions of central nervous system macrophages. J Immunol., 2014, 193(6): 2615-2621.
Kempuraj, D., et al., 2010. Mercury induces inflammatory mediator release from human mast cells. J Neuroinflammation. 7, 20.
Kirkley KS, Madl JE, Duncan C, Gulland FM, Tjalkens RB. Domoic acid-induced seizures in California sea lions (Zalophus californianus) are associated with neuroinflammatory brain injury. Aquat Toxicol., 2014, 156C: 259-268.
Kreutzberg GW. Microglia, the first line of defence in brain pathologies. Arzneimttelforsch, 1995, 45: 357-360.
Kreutzberg GW. Microglia : a sensor for pathological events in the CNS. Trends Neurosci., 2006, 19: 312-318.
Lindhal LS, Bird L, Legare ME, Mikeska G, Bratton GR, Tiffany-Castiglioni E. 1999. Differential ability of astroglia and neuronal cells to accumulate lead: Dependence on cell type and on degree of differentiation. ToxSci 50: 236-243.
Liu MC, Liu XQ, Wang W, Shen XF, Che HL, Guo YY, et al., Involvement of microglia activation in the lead induced long-term potentiation impairment. PLoS One, 2012, 7(8): e43924.
Lohren, H., et al., 2015. Toxicity of organic and inorganic mercury species in differentiated human neurons and human astrocytes. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 32, 200-8.
Lu J, Wu DM, Zheng YL, Hu B, Cheng W, Zhang ZF, Li MQ. Troxerutin counteracts domoic acid-induced memory deficits in mice by inhibiting CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β-mediated inflammatory response and oxidative stress. J Immunol., 2013, 190: 3466-3479.
Malfa, G.A., et al., 2014. "Reactive" response evaluation of primary human astrocytes after methylmercury exposure. J Neurosci Res. 92, 95-103.
Marin-Teva JL, Cuadros MA, Martin-Oliva D, Navascues J., Microglia and neuronal cell death. Neuron glia biology, 2011, 7(1): 25-40.
Mesuret G, Engel T, Hessel EV, Sanz-Rodriguez A, Jimenez-Pacheco A, Miras-Portugal MT, et al. 2014. P2X7 receptor inhibition interrupts the progression of seizures in immature rats and reduces hippocampal damage. CNS neuroscience & therapeutics 20(6): 556-564.
Ni, M., et al., 2011. Comparative study on the response of rat primary astrocytes and microglia to methylmercury toxicity. Glia. 59, 810-20.
Ni, M., et al., 2012. Glia and methylmercury neurotoxicity. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 75, 1091-101.
Pulido OM. Domoic acid toxicologic pathology: a review. Mar Drugs, 2008, 6: 180-219.
Qian Y, Zheng Y, Weber D, Tiffany-Castiglioni E. 2007. A 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein is involved in the decrease of interleukin-6 secretion by lead treatment from astrocytes. American journal of physiology Cell physiology 293(3): C897-905.
Ransohoff RM, Brown MA. Innate immunity in the central nervous system. J Clin Invest., 2012, 122(4): 1164-1171.
Roda, E., et al., 2008. Cerebellum cholinergic muscarinic receptor (subtype-2 and -3) and cytoarchitecture after developmental exposure to methylmercury: an immunohistochemical study in rat. J Chem Neuroanat. 35, 285-94.
Rossi D. Astrocyte physiopathology: At the crossroads of intercellular networking, inflammation and cell death. Prog Neurobiol., 2015, 130: 86-120.
Ryan JC, Morey JS, Ramsdell JS, Van Dolah FM. Acute phase gene expression in mice exposed to the marine neurotoxin domoic acid. Neuroscience, 2005, 136: 1121-1132.
Santhanasabapathy, R., et al., 2015. Farnesol quells oxidative stress, reactive gliosis and inflammation during acrylamide-induced neurotoxicity: Behavioral and biochemical evidence. Neuroscience. 308, 212-27.
Scallet AC, Schmued LC, Johannessen JN. Neurohistochemical biomarkers of the marine neurotoxicant, domoic acid. Neurotoxicol Teratol., 2005, 27: 745-752.
Sobin C, Montoya MG, Parisi N, Schaub T, Cervantes M, Armijos RX. 2013. Microglial disruption in young mice with early chronic lead exposure. Toxicol Lett 220(1): 44-52.
Streit WJ, Conde J, Harrison JK. Chemokines and Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging., 2001, 22: 909-913.
Struzynska L. 2000. The protective role of astroglia in the early period of experimental lead toxicity in the rat. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 60(2): 167-173.
Struzynska L, Bubko I, Walski M, Rafalowska U. 2001. Astroglial reaction during the early phase of acute lead toxicity in the adult rat brain. Toxicology 165: 121-131.
Tiwari V, Chopra K. 2012. Attenuation of oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and apoptosis by curcumin prevents cognitive deficits in rats postnatally exposed to ethanol. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 224(4): 519-535.
Wang, Y.T., et al., 2017. Acrolein acts as a neurotoxin in the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system of rat: involvement of alpha-synuclein aggregation and programmed cell death. Sci Rep. 7, 45741.
Yamamoto, M., et al., 2012. Increased expression of aquaporin-4 with methylmercury exposure in the brain of the common marmoset. J Toxicol Sci. 37, 749-63.
Zhang, Y., Bolivar, V.J., Lawrence, D.A., 2012. Developmental exposure to mercury chloride does not impair social behavior of C57BL/6 x BTBR F(1) mice. J Immunotoxicol. 9, 401-10.
Zhao, M., et al., 2017. Effect of acrylamide-induced neurotoxicity in a primary astrocytes/microglial co-culture model. Toxicol In Vitro. 39, 119-125.
Zhao, M., et al., 2017. Acrylamide-induced neurotoxicity in primary astrocytes and microglia: Roles of the Nrf2-ARE and NF-kappaB pathways. Food Chem Toxicol. 106, 25-35.
Zhao, W.Z., et al., 2017. Neuroprotective Effects of Baicalein on Acrolein-induced Neurotoxicity in the Nigrostriatal Dopaminergic System of Rat Brain. Mol Neurobiol.
Zurich MG, Monnet-Tschudi F, Berode M, Honegger P. 1998. Lead acetate toxicity in vitro: Dependence on the cell composition of the cultures. Toxicol In Vitro 12(2): 191-196.
Zurich M-G, Eskes C, Honegger P, Bérode M, Monnet-Tschudi F. 2002. Maturation-dependent neurotoxicity of lead aceate in vitro: Implication of glial reactions. J Neurosc Res 70: 108-116.
Relationship: 1718: N/A, Cell injury/death leads to Tissue resident cell activation
AOPs Referencing Relationship
| AOP Name | Adjacency | Weight of Evidence | Quantitative Understanding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binding of electrophilic chemicals to SH(thiol)-group of proteins and /or to seleno-proteins during brain development leads to impairment of learning and memory | adjacent | Moderate |
Evidence Supporting Applicability of this Relationship
| Life Stage | Evidence |
|---|---|
| During brain development, adulthood and aging | High |
| Sex | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Unspecific | High |
Key Event Relationship Description
The pioneering work of Kreutzberg and coworkers (1995, 1996) has shown that neuronal injury leads to neuroinflammation, with microglia and astrocyte reactivity. Several chemokines and chemokines receptors (fraktalkine, CD200) control the neuron-microglia interactions, and a loss of this control can trigger microglial reactivity (Blank and Prinz, 2013; Chapman et al., 2000; Streit et al., 2001). Upon injury causing neuronal death (mainly necrotic), signals termed Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs) are released by damaged neurons and promote microglial reactivity (Marin-Teva et al., 2011; Katsumoto et al., 2014). Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are pattern-recognition receptors that recognize specific pathogen- and danger-associated molecular signatures (PAMPs and DAMPs) and subsequently initiate inflammatory and immune responses. Microglial cells express TLRs, mainly TLR-2, which can detect neuronal cell death (for review, see Hayward and Lee, 2014). TLR-2 functions as a master sentry receptor to detect neuronal death and tissue damage in many different neurological conditions including nerve trans-section injury, traumatic brain injury and hippocampal excitotoxicity (Hayward and Lee, 2014). Astrocytes, the other cellular mediator of neuroinflammation (Ranshoff and Brown, 2012) are also able to sense tissue injury via TLR-3 (Farina et al., 2007; Rossi, 2015).
Evidence Supporting this KER
Biological PlausibilityIt is widely accepted that cell/neuronal injury and death lead to neuroinflammation (microglial and astrocyte reactivities) in adult brain. In the developing brain, neuroinflammation was observed after neurodegeneration induced by excitotoxic lesions (Acarin et al., 1997; Dommergues et al., 2003) or after ethanol exposure (Tiwari et al., 2012; Ahmad et al., 2016). It is important to note that physiological activation of microglial cells is observed during normal brain development for removal of apoptotic debris (Ashwell 1990, 1991). But exposure to toxicant (ethanol), excitotoxic insults (kainic acid) or traumatic brain injury during development can also induce apoptosis in hippocampus and cerebral cortex, as measured either by TUNEL, BID or caspase 3 upregulation associated to an inflammatory response, as evidenced by increased level of pro- inflammatory cytokines IL-1b, TNF-a, of NO, of p65 NF-kB or of the marker of astrogliosis, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), suggesting that, during brain development, neuroinflammation can also be triggerred by apoptosis induced by several types of insult (Tiwari and Chopra, 2012; Baratz et al., 2015; Mesuret et al., 2014).
Empirical EvidenceMercury
Young mice receiving a fish diet (MeHgCl) for 3 months exhibited in cortex a decrease of the chemokine Ccl2 and neuronal death, as measured by a decrease in cell density, as well as microglial reactivity (increase in Iba1-labelled cells) (Godefroy et al., 2012)
Perinatal exposure to MeHgCl (GD7-PD21, 0.5 mg/kg bw/day in drinking water) lead to a delayed decrease (PD 36) of cholinergic muscarinic receptors in cerebellum accompanied by astrogliosis (Roda et al., 2008).
Immature rat brain cell cultures maintained in 3D conditions were exposed to either MeHgCl or HgCl2 (10-9 – 10-6 M, for 10 days). This treatment caused microglial and astrocyte activation without neuronal death, but a reversible decrease of the expression of the neuronal marker MAP2 (Monnet-Tschudi et al., 1996 ; Eskes et al., 2002).
Adult marmoset exposed acutely to 5 mg Hg/kg/day p.o. exhibited apoptosis in occipital cortex, as well as glial reactivity (GFAP and Iba1 increased). Mercury content in occipital cortex was 31 mg/g (Yamamoto et al., 2012).
Monkeys exposed to MeHgCl (50 mg/bw for 6,12,18 months) showed microglial and astrocyte activation without any change in neuronal number. Both astrocyte and microglia accumulated elevated levels of inorganic mercury, suggesting a direct effect of mercury on glial cells (Charleston et al., 1996).
Human LUHMES cells as model of dopaminergic neurons and the human astrocyte cell line CFF-STTG1 were exposed to MeHgCl (0.25 -5 mM), thiomersal (0.25 – 5 mM) or HgCl2 (5-35 mM), what affected their cell viability. Neurons were much more sensitive than astrocytes (Lohner et al., 2015).
A direct activation of rat primary microglial cells and astrocytes was observed after exposure to MeHgCl (10-10-10-6 M, for 5 days). (Eskes et aé., 2002).
Astrocyte + microglia in co-cultures exposed to mercury (1-5 mM for 30 min to 6 days) showed lower levels of GSH in microglia than in astrocytes (Ni et al., 2011 ; 2012).
Human primary astrocyte cell line exposed to MeHgCl (1.125 mM) for 24h and 72h did not exhibit an increase of GFAP, but of NfkB after the 72h (Malfa et al., 2014).
Human mast cells (leukemic LAD2, derived from umbilical cord blood) showed an increase of IL-6 release when exposed to HgCl2 (0.1-10 mM, for 10 min to 24h). It is hypothesized that mast cell activation could lead to BBB disruption and to neuroinflammation. (Kempurai et al., 2010).
Sex dependency
In prairie voles 10 weeks exposure to 600 ppm HgCl2 in drinking water lead to an increase of TNF-a in hippocampus of male, but not in female (Curtis et al., 2011).
Acrylamide (acrylamide is a common food contaminant generated by heat processing)
Adult mice received 10, 20, 30 mg/kg bw for 4 weeks. The dose of 20 mg/kg bw caused neurological symptoms (ex. cognitive impairment) associated to an increased oxidative stress, a decrease of GSH and glial reactivity (GFAP and Iba1 increased) in cortex, hippocampus and striatum. An increase in TNF-a, IL-1b and i-NOS expression in all 3 brain regions was also observed. (Santhanasabepathy et al., 2015)
Isolated and/or co-cultures of microglial cells or astrocytes treated with acrylamide 0-1mM for 24-96h exhibited an increased release of TNF-a, IL-1b, IL-6 and G-CSF, suggesting a direct effect of acrylamide on glial cells (Zhao et al., 2017a,b).
Neonatal rat astrocytes treated with acrylamide (0.1-1mM) for 7, 11, 15, or 20 days increased their proliferation rate as measured by PCNA staining. Astrocyte proliferation is also a sign of reactivity. (Aschner et al., 2005).
Acrolein
Adult rat received an infusion of acrolein (15, 50, 150 nmoles/0.5 ml) directly in substantia nigra which caused a decrease of Tyrosine hydroxylase immunostaining, an increase in caspase 1 and an activation of microglial cells and astrocytes (Wang et al., 2017).
Similar treatment as above induced an increase in lipid peroxidation, of hsp32 and of caspase 1 with an increase in GFAP and in ED1 (marker of macrophagic microglial cells) as well as of IL-1b (Zhao et al., 2017).
Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
Mercury
Mouse developmental exposure to 50 mM of HgCl2 in maternal drinking water from GD8 to PD21 did not induce any change in GM-CSF, IFN-g, IL-1b, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p70. IL-13, IL-17, MCP1, MIP2 and TNF-a measured by Luminex in brain slices of PD21 and PD70. No sex differences, but brain increase of IgG and increased sociability in females (Zhang et al., 2012).
3D rat brain cell cultures treated for 10 days with HgCl2 or MeHgCl (10-10 - 10-6 M) exhibited increased apotosis measured by TUNEL, but exclusively in immature cultures. The proportion of cells undergoing apoptotis was highest for astrocytes than for neurons. But the apoptotic nuclei were not associated with reactive microglial cells as evidenced by double staining (Monnet-Tschudi, 1998).
Acrylamide
A 2 weeks exposure to acrylamide in drinking water (44mg/kg/day) induced behavioral effects, such a decreased in locomotor activity, but with no effect at gene level on neuronal and inflammatory markers analyzed in somatosensory and motor cortex (Bowyer et al., 2009).
References
Acarin L, González B, Castellano B, Castro AJ. 1997. Quantitative analysis of microglial reaction to a cortical excitotoxic lesion in the early postnatal brain. ExpNeurol 147: 410-417.
Ahmad A, Shah SA, Badshah H, Kim MJ, Ali T, Yoon GH, et al. 2016. Neuroprotection by Vitamin C Against Ethanol-Induced Neuroinflammation Associated Neurodegeneration in the Developing Rat Brain. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 15(3): 360-370.
Aschner, M., Wu, Q., Friedman, M.A., 2005. Effects of acrylamide on primary neonatal rat astrocyte functions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1053, 444-54.
Ashwell K. 1990. Microglia and cell death in the developing mouse cerebellum. DevBrain Res 55: 219-230.
Ashwell K. 1991. The distribution of microglia and cell death in the fetal rat forebrain. DevBrain Res 58: 1-12.
Baratz R, Tweedie D, Wang JY, Rubovitch V, Luo W, Hoffer BJ, et al. 2015. Transiently lowering tumor necrosis factor-alpha synthesis ameliorates neuronal cell loss and cognitive impairments induced by minimal traumatic brain injury in mice. J Neuroinflammation 12: 45.
Blank T, Prinz M. Microglia as modulators of cognition and neuropsychiatric disorders. Glia, 2013, 61: 62-70.
Bowyer, J.F., et al., 2009. The mRNA expression and histological integrity in rat forebrain motor and sensory regions are minimally affected by acrylamide exposure through drinking water. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 240, 401-11.
Chapman GA, Moores K, Harrison D, Campbell CA, Stewart BR, Strijbos PJLM. Fractalkine Cleavage from Neuronal Membrans Represents an Acute Event in Inflammatory Response to Excitotoxic Brain Damage. J Neurosc., 2000, 20 RC87: 1-5.
Charleston JS, Body RL, Bolender RP, Mottet NK, Vahter ME, Burbacher TM: Changes in the number of astrocytes and microglia in the thalamus of the monkey Macaca fascicularis following long-term subclinical methylmercury exposure. NeuroToxicology 1996, 17:127-138.
Thomas Curtis, J., et al., 2011. Chronic inorganic mercury exposure induces sex-specific changes in central TNFalpha expression: importance in autism? Neurosci Lett. 504, 40-4.
Dommergues MA, Plaisant F, Verney C, Gressens P. 2003. Early microglial activation following neonatal excitotoxic brain damage in mice: a potential target for neuroprotection. Neuroscience 121(3): 619-628.
Eskes C, Honegger P, Juillerat-Jeanneret L, Monnet-Tschudi F. 2002. Microglial reaction induced by noncytotoxic methylmercury treatment leads to neuroprotection via interactions with astrocytes and IL-6 release. Glia 37(1): 43-52.
Farina C, Aloisi F, Meinl E. Astrocytes are active players in cerebral innate immunity. Trends Immunol, 2007, 28(3): 138-145.
Godefroy, D., et al., 2012. The chemokine CCL2 protects against methylmercury neurotoxicity. Toxicol Sci. 125, 209-18.
Hayward JH, Lee SJ. A Decade of Research on TLR2 Discovering Its Pivotal Role in Glial Activation and Neuroinflammation in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Experimental Neurobiology, 2014, 23(2): 138-147.
Katsumoto A, Lu H, Miranda AS, Ransohoff RM. Ontogeny and functions of central nervous system macrophages. J Immunol., 2014, 193(6): 2615-2621.
Kempuraj, D., et al., 2010. Mercury induces inflammatory mediator release from human mast cells. J Neuroinflammation. 7, 20.
Kreutzberg GW. Microglia, the first line of defence in brain pathologies. Arzneimttelforsch, 1995, 45: 357-360.
Kreutzberg GW. Microglia : a sensor for pathological events in the CNS. Trends Neurosci., 2006, 19: 312-318.
Lohren, H., et al., 2015. Toxicity of organic and inorganic mercury species in differentiated human neurons and human astrocytes. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 32, 200-8.
Malfa, G.A., et al., 2014. "Reactive" response evaluation of primary human astrocytes after methylmercury exposure. J Neurosci Res. 92, 95-103.
Marin-Teva JL, Cuadros MA, Martin-Oliva D, Navascues J., Microglia and neuronal cell death. Neuron glia biology, 2011, 7(1): 25-40.
Mesuret G, Engel T, Hessel EV, Sanz-Rodriguez A, Jimenez-Pacheco A, Miras-Portugal MT, et al. 2014. P2X7 receptor inhibition interrupts the progression of seizures in immature rats and reduces hippocampal damage. CNS neuroscience & therapeutics 20(6): 556-564.
Ni, M., et al., 2011. Comparative study on the response of rat primary astrocytes and microglia to methylmercury toxicity. Glia. 59, 810-20.
Ni, M., et al., 2012. Glia and methylmercury neurotoxicity. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 75, 1091-101.
Ransohoff RM, Brown MA. Innate immunity in the central nervous system. J Clin Invest., 2012, 122(4): 1164-1171.
Roda, E., et al., 2008. Cerebellum cholinergic muscarinic receptor (subtype-2 and -3) and cytoarchitecture after developmental exposure to methylmercury: an immunohistochemical study in rat. J Chem Neuroanat. 35, 285-94.
Rossi D. Astrocyte physiopathology: At the crossroads of intercellular networking, inflammation and cell death. Prog Neurobiol., 2015, 130: 86-120.
Santhanasabapathy, R., et al., 2015. Farnesol quells oxidative stress, reactive gliosis and inflammation during acrylamide-induced neurotoxicity: Behavioral and biochemical evidence. Neuroscience. 308, 212-27.
Streit WJ, Conde J, Harrison JK. Chemokines and Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging., 2001, 22: 909-913.
Tiwari V, Chopra K. 2012. Attenuation of oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and apoptosis by curcumin prevents cognitive deficits in rats postnatally exposed to ethanol. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 224(4): 519-535
Wang, Y.T., et al., 2017. Acrolein acts as a neurotoxin in the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system of rat: involvement of alpha-synuclein aggregation and programmed cell death. Sci Rep. 7, 45741.
Yamamoto, M., et al., 2012. Increased expression of aquaporin-4 with methylmercury exposure in the brain of the common marmoset. J Toxicol Sci. 37, 749-63.
Zhang, Y., Bolivar, V.J., Lawrence, D.A., 2012. Developmental exposure to mercury chloride does not impair social behavior of C57BL/6 x BTBR F(1) mice. J Immunotoxicol. 9, 401-10.
Zhao, M., et al., 2017. Effect of acrylamide-induced neurotoxicity in a primary astrocytes/microglial co-culture model. Toxicol In Vitro. 39, 119-125.
Zhao, M., et al., 2017. Acrylamide-induced neurotoxicity in primary astrocytes and microglia: Roles of the Nrf2-ARE and NF-kappaB pathways. Food Chem Toxicol. 106, 25-35.
Zhao, W.Z., et al., 2017. Neuroprotective Effects of Baicalein on Acrolein-induced Neurotoxicity in the Nigrostriatal Dopaminergic System of Rat Brain. Mol Neurobiol.
Relationship: 1687: N/A, Neuroinflammation leads to N/A, Cell injury/death
AOPs Referencing Relationship
| AOP Name | Adjacency | Weight of Evidence | Quantitative Understanding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binding of electrophilic chemicals to SH(thiol)-group of proteins and /or to seleno-proteins during brain development leads to impairment of learning and memory | adjacent | Moderate |
Evidence Supporting Applicability of this Relationship
| Life Stage | Evidence |
|---|---|
| During brain development, adulthood and aging | High |
| Sex | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Unspecific |
Key Event Relationship Description
Cells of the innate (microglia and astrocytes) and of the adaptive (infiltrating monocytes and lymphocytes) immune system of the brain have various ways to kill neighboring cells. This is in part due to evolutionary-conserved mechanisms evolved to kill virus-infected cells or tumor cells; in part it is a bystander phenomenon due to the release of mediators that should activate other cells and contribute to the killing of invading micro-organisms. An exaggerated or unbalanced activation of immune cells can thus lead to parenchymal (neuronal) cell death (Gehrmann et al., 1995). Mediators known to have such effects comprise components of the complement system and cytolkines/death receptor ligands triggering programmed cell death (Dong and Benveniste, 2001). Various secreted proteases (e.g. matrix metalloproteases), lipid mediators (e.g. ceramide or gangliosides) or reactive oxygen species can contribute to bystander death of neurons (Chao et al., 1995; Nakajima et al., 2002; Brown and Bal-Price, 2003; Ktaft and Harry, 2011; Taetsch and Block, 2013). The equimolar production of superoxide and NO from glial cells can lead to high steady levels of peoxynitrite, which is a very potent cytotoxicant (Yuste et al., 2015). Already stressed neurons, with an impaired anti-oxidant defence system, are more sensitive to such mediators (Xu et al., 2015). Healthy cells continuously display anti "eat-me" signals, while damaged and stressed neurons/neurites display "eat-me" signals that may be recognized by microglia as signals to start phagocytosis (Neher et al., 2012). Reactive astrocytes are also able to release neurotoxic molecules (Mena and Garcia de Ybenes, 2008; Niranjan, 2014). However, astrocytes may also be protective due to their capacity to quench free radicals and secrete neurotrophic factors. The activation of astrocytes may reduce neurotrophic support to neurons (for review, Mena and Garcia de Ybenes, 2008).
Evidence Supporting this KER
Biological PlausibilityIn vitro co-culture experiments have demonstrated that reactive glial cells (microglia and astrocytes) can kill neurons (Chao et al., 1995; Brown and Bal-Price, 2003; Kraft and Harry, 2011; Taetzsch and Block, 2013) and that interventions with e.g. i-NOS inhibition can rescue the neurons (Yadav et al., 2012; Brzozowski et al., 2015). Drugs that block Toll like receptor pathways, which are expressed by glial cells have been proven to be protective by decreasing ROS and RNS production (Lucas et al., 2013).
Reactive microglia can remove synapses, a process known as synapse stripping (Banati et al., 1993; Kettenmann et al., 2013). Reactive astrocytes were also associated with neurite and synapse reduction (Calvo-Ochoa et al., 2014). Microglia can modulate synapse plasticity, an effect mediated by cytokines. During development, microglia can promote synaptogenesis or engulf synapses, a process known as synaptic pruning (for review, Jebelli et al., 2015). It is hypothesized that alterations in microglia functioning during synapse formation and maturation of the brain can have significant long-term effects on the final established neural circuits (for review, Harry and Kraft, 2012). The fact that astrocytes can receive and respond to the synaptic information produced by neuronal activity, owing to their expression of a wide range of neurotransmitter receptors, has given rise to the concept of tripartite synapse (for review, Perez-Alvarez and Araque, 2013; Bezzi and Volterra, 2001). Pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-a, IL-1b and IL-6, which are produced by reactive astrocytes, are on one side implicated in synapse formation and scaling, long-term potentiation and neurogenesis (for review, Bilbo and Schwartz, 2009) and on the other side can kill neurons (Chao et al., 1995; Kraft and Harry, 2011). Taken together, this suggests that neuron-glia interactions are tightly regulated and that an imbalance, such as increased or long-term release of these inflammatory mediators may lead to deleterious effects on neurons.
Empirical EvidenceMercury
Mercury accumulates in the brain particularly in astrocytes and induce astrocyte swelling, excitatory amino acid release and decreased anti-oxidant protections (Shanker et al., 2003; Allen et al., 2001), features that are also observed in reactive astrocytes. Due to the central role of astrocytes for neuronal function (control of water transport, production of trophic factors, of anti-oxidants, tri-partite synapse,… (Ximeres da Silva, 2016; Bezzi and Volterra, 2001; Hertz and Zielke, 2004; Sidoryk-Wegrzynowicz et al., 2011), it is thought that neuronal dysfunction may be secondary to disturbance in astrocytes (Aschner et al., 2007).
Perinatal exposure (GD7-PD21) of rat to MeHgCl (0.5 mg/kg bw/day) in drinking water lead to gliosis in cerebellum of immature rats (PD21) without affecting the cholinergic system. In contrast, at PD36, astrogliosis was accompanied by an increase of muscarinic M2-immunopositive Bergman cells and a lack of M3 muscarinic receptors in the molecular layer. These results suggest that astrogliosis which is observed first at PD21 may be responsible of the delayed effects of mercury on neurons (Roda et al., 2008).
Developmental exposure of mice from GD8 to PD21 to 50 mM HgCl2 in maternal drinking water: Female offsprings exhibited higher neuroinflammation which is associated with altered social behavior (Zhang et al., 2013).
MG17, a novel triazole derivative, was able to reduce mercury-induced upregulation of IL-1b, IL-6 and TNF-a (measured by RT-PCR) and proved to be protective against mercury-induced neurodegeneration (Matharasala et al., 2017).
Adult rats exposed to MeHg (5mg/kg bw) for 12 consecutive days exhibited piknotic nuclei in cerebellar granule cells, what was reverted by a co-administration of CA074 an inhibitor of cathepsin released by activated microglia. These observations strongly suggest that the mercury–induced neuronal pathological changes are secondary to microglial activation (Sakamoto et al., 2008).
Acrylamide
Rats exposed to acrylamide (20 mg/kg bw for 4 weeks) together with farmesol (sequiterpene) showed a downregulation of astrogliosis (i.e. decreased GFAP) and of microgliosis (i.e. decreased Iba1) and of TNF-a, Il-1b and i-NOS in cortex, hippocampus and striatum. This was associated with a marked improvement in motor coordination and a decrease in markers of oxidative stress, as compared to rats exposed to acrylamide alone (Santhanasabapathy et al., 2015).
Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
In 3D rat brain cell-cultures, co-administration of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 (10 ng/ml) together with non-cytotoxic concentrations of MeHgCl (3 x 10-7 M) for 10 days protected from the mercury-induced decreased in MAP2 immunostaining, suggesting a positive effect of IL-6, in accord with its descibed trophic activity (Eskes et al., 2002).
References
Allen, J.W., Shanker, G., Aschner, M., 2001. Methylmercury inhibits the in vitro uptake of the glutathione precursor, cystine, in astrocytes, but not in neurons. Brain Res. 894, 131-40.
Aschner, M., et al., 2007. Involvement of glutamate and reactive oxygen species in methylmercury neurotoxicity. Braz J Med Biol Res. 40, 285-91.
Banati, R.B., et al., 1993. Cytotoxicity of microglia. Glia. 7, 111-8.
Bezzi, P., Volterra, A., 2001. A neuron-glia signalling network in the active brain. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 11, 387-94.
Bilbo, S.D., Schwarz, J.M., 2009. Early-life programming of later-life brain and behavior: a critical role for the immune system. Front Behav Neurosci. 3, 14.
Brown GC, Bal-Price A. 2003. Inflammatory neurodegeneration mediated by nitric oxide, glutamate, and mitochondria. Mol Neurobiol 27(3): 325-355.
Brzozowski MJ, Jenner P, Rose S. 2015. Inhibition of i-NOS but not n-NOS protects rat primary cell cultures against MPP(+)-induced neuronal toxicity. J Neural Transm 122(6): 779-788.
Calvo-Ochoa, E., et al., 2014. Short-term high-fat-and-fructose feeding produces insulin signaling alterations accompanied by neurite and synaptic reduction and astroglial activation in the rat hippocampus. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 34, 1001-8.
Chao CC, Hu S, Peterson PK. 1995. Glia, cytokines, and neurotoxicity. CritRevNeurobiol 9: 189-205.
Dong Y, Benveniste EN. 2001. Immune Function of Astrocytes. Glia 36: 180-190.
Eskes C, Honegger P, Juillerat-Jeanneret L, Monnet-Tschudi F. 2002. Microglial reaction induced by noncytotoxic methylmercury treatment leads to neuroprotection via interactions with astrocytes and IL-6 release. Glia 37(1): 43-52.
Gehrmann J, Banati RB, Wiessnert C, Hossmann KA, Kreutzberg GW. 1995. Reactive microglia in cerebral ischaemia: An early mediator of tissue damage? NeuropatholApplNeurobiol 21: 277-289.
Harry, G.J., Kraft, A.D., 2012. Microglia in the developing brain: a potential target with lifetime effects. Neurotoxicology. 33, 191-206.
Hertz, L., Zielke, H.R., 2004. Astrocytic control of glutamatergic activity: astrocytes as stars of the show. Trends Neurosci. 27, 735-43.
Jebelli, J., et al., 2015. Glia: guardians, gluttons, or guides for the maintenance of neuronal connectivity? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1351, 1-10.
Kettenmann, H., Kirchhoff, F., Verkhratsky, A., 2013. Microglia: new roles for the synaptic stripper. Neuron. 77, 10-8.
Kraft AD, Harry GJ. 2011. Features of microglia and neuroinflammation relevant to environmental exposure and neurotoxicity. International journal of environmental research and public health 8(7): 2980-3018.
Lucas, K., Maes, M., 2013. Role of the Toll Like receptor (TLR) radical cycle in chronic inflammation: possible treatments targeting the TLR4 pathway. Mol Neurobiol. 48, 190-204.
Matharasala, G., Samala, G., Perumal, Y., 2017. MG17, a novel triazole derivative abrogated neuroinflammation and related neurodegenerative symptoms in rodents. Curr Mol Pharmacol.
Mena MA, Garcia de Yebenes J. 2008. Glial cells as players in parkinsonism: the "good," the "bad," and the "mysterious" glia. Neuroscientist 14(6): 544-560.
Nakajima K, Tohyama Y, Kohsaka S, Kurihara T. 2002. Ceramide activates microglia to enhance the production/secretion of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) without induction of deleterious factors in vitro. J Neurochem 80: 697-705.
Niranjan R. 2014. The role of inflammatory and oxidative stress mechanisms in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease: focus on astrocytes. Mol Neurobiol 49(1): 28-38.
Neher JJ, Neniskyte U, Brown GC. 2012. Primary phagocytosis of neurons by inflamed microglia: potential roles in neurodegeneration. Frontiers in pharmacology 3: 27.
Perez-Alvarez, A., Araque, A., 2013. Astrocyte-neuron interaction at tripartite synapses. Curr Drug Targets. 14, 1220-4.
Roda, E., et al., 2008. Cerebellum cholinergic muscarinic receptor (subtype-2 and -3) and cytoarchitecture after developmental exposure to methylmercury: an immunohistochemical study in rat. J Chem Neuroanat. 35, 285-94.
Sakamoto, M., et al., 2008. Possible involvement of cathepsin B released by microglia in methylmercury-induced cerebellar pathological changes in the adult rat. Neurosci Lett. 442, 292-6.
Shanker, G., Syversen, T., Aschner, M., 2003. Astrocyte-mediated methylmercury neurotoxicity. Biol Trace Elem Res. 95, 1-10.
Santhanasabapathy, R., et al., 2015. Farnesol quells oxidative stress, reactive gliosis and inflammation during acrylamide-induced neurotoxicity: Behavioral and biochemical evidence. Neuroscience. 308, 212-27.
Sidoryk-Wegrzynowicz, M., et al., 2011. Role of astrocytes in brain function and disease. Toxicol Pathol. 39, 115-23.
Taetzsch T, Block ML. 2013. Pesticides, microglial NOX2, and Parkinson's disease. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 27(2): 137-149.
Ximenes-da-Silva, A., 2016. Metal Ion Toxins and Brain Aquaporin-4 Expression: An Overview. Front Neurosci. 10, 233.
Xu, S., et al., 2015. Wogonin prevents rat dorsal root ganglion neurons death via inhibiting tunicamycin-induced ER stress in vitro. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 35, 389-398.
Yadav, S., et al., 2012. Role of secondary mediators in caffeine-mediated neuroprotection in maneb- and paraquat-induced Parkinson's disease phenotype in the mouse. Neurochem Res. 37, 875-84.
Yuste, J.E., et al., 2015. Implications of glial nitric oxide in neurodegenerative diseases. Front Cell Neurosci. 9, 322.
Zhang, Y., Bolivar, V.J., Lawrence, D.A., 2013. Maternal exposure to mercury chloride during pregnancy and lactation affects the immunity and social behavior of offspring. Toxicol Sci. 133, 101-11.
Relationship: 1719: Increasaed pro-inflammatory mediators leads to N/A, Cell injury/death
AOPs Referencing Relationship
| AOP Name | Adjacency | Weight of Evidence | Quantitative Understanding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binding of electrophilic chemicals to SH(thiol)-group of proteins and /or to seleno-proteins during brain development leads to impairment of learning and memory | adjacent | Moderate |
Evidence Supporting Applicability of this Relationship
| Life Stage | Evidence |
|---|---|
| During brain development, adulthood and aging | High |
| Sex | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Unspecific | High |
Key Event Relationship Description
Cells of the innate (microglia and astrocytes) and of the adaptive (infiltrating monocytes and lymphocytes) immune system of the brain have various ways to kill neighboring cells. This is in part due to evolutionary-conserved mechanisms evolved to kill virus-infected cells or tumor cells; in part it is a bystander phenomenon due to the release of mediators that should activate other cells and contribute to the killing of invading micro-organisms. An exaggerated or unbalanced activation of immune cells can thus lead to parenchymal (neuronal) cell death (Gehrmann et al., 1995). Mediators known to have such effects comprise components of the complement system and cytolkines/death receptor ligands triggering programmed cell death (Dong and Benveniste, 2001). Various secreted proteases (e.g. matrix metalloproteases), lipid mediators (e.g. ceramide or gangliosides) or reactive oxygen species can contribute to bystander death of neurons (Chao et al., 1995; Nakajima et al., 2002; Brown and Bal-Price, 2003; Kraft and Harry, 2011; Taetsch and Block, 2013). The equimolar production of superoxide and NO from glial cells can lead to high steady levels of peoxynitrite, which is a very potent cytotoxicant (Yuste et al., 2015). Already stressed neurons, with an impaired anti-oxidant defence system, are more sensitive to such mediators (Xu et al., 2015). Healthy cells continuously display anti "eat-me" signals, while damaged and stressed neurons/neurites display "eat-me" signals that may be recognized by microglia as signals to start phagocytosis (Neher et al., 2012). Reactive astrocytes are also able to release neurotoxic molecules (Mena and Garcia de Ybenes, 2008; Niranjan, 2014). However, astrocytes may also be protective due to their capacity to quench free radicals and secrete neurotrophic factors. The activation of astrocytes may reduce neurotrophic support to neurons (for review, Mena and Garcia de Ybenes, 2008).
Evidence Supporting this KER
Biological PlausibilityIn vitro co-culture experiments have demonstrated that reactive glial cells (microglia and astrocytes) can kill neurons (Chao et al., 1995; Brown and Bal-Price, 2003; Kraft and Harry, 2011; Taetzsch and Block, 2013) and that interventions with e.g. i-NOS inhibition can rescue the neurons (Yadav et al., 2012; Brzozowski et al., 2015). Drugs that block Toll like receptor pathways, which are expressed by glial cells have been proven to be protective by decreasing ROS and RNS production (Lucas et al., 2013).
Reactive microglia can remove synapses, a process known as synapse stripping (Banati et al., 1993; Kettenmann et al., 2013). Reactive astrocytes were also associated with neurite and synapse reduction (Calvo-Ochoa et al., 2014). Microglia can modulate synapse plasticity, an effect mediated by cytokines. During development, microglia can promote synaptogenesis or engulf synapses, a process known as synaptic pruning (for review, Jebelli et al., 2015). It is hypothesized that alterations in microglia functioning during synapse formation and maturation of the brain can have significant long-term effects on the final established neural circuits (for review, Harry and Kraft, 2012). The fact that astrocytes can receive and respond to the synaptic information produced by neuronal activity, owing to their expression of a wide range of neurotransmitter receptors, has given rise to the concept of tripartite synapse (for review, Perez-Alvarez and Araque, 2013; Bezzi and Volterra, 2001). Pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-a, IL-1b and IL-6, which are produced by reactive astrocytes, are on one side implicated in synapse formation and scaling, long-term potentiation and neurogenesis (for review, Bilbo and Schwartz, 2009) and on the other side can kill neurons (Chao et al., 1995; Kraft and Harry, 2011). Taken together, this suggests that neuron-glia interactions are tightly regulated and that an imbalance, such as increased or long-term release of these inflammatory mediators may lead to deleterious effects on neurons.
Empirical EvidenceMercury
Mercury accumulates in the brain particularly in astrocytes and induce astrocyte swelling, excitatory amino acid release and decreased anti-oxidant protections (Shanker et al., 2003; Allen et al., 2001), features that are also observed in reactive astrocytes. Due to the central role of astrocytes for neuronal function (control of water transport, production of trophic factors, of anti-oxidants, tri-partite synapse,… (Ximeres da Silva, 2016; Bezzi and Volterra, 2001; Hertz and Zielke, 2004; Sidoryk-Wegrzynowicz et al., 2011), it is thought that neuronal dysfunction may be secondary to disturbance in astrocytes (Aschner et al., 2007).
Perinatal exposure (GD7-PD21) of rat to MeHgCl (0.5 mg/kg bw/day) in drinking water lead to gliosis in cerebellum of immature rats (PD21) without affecting the cholinergic system. In contrast, at PD36, astrogliosis was accompanied by an increase of muscarinic M2-immunopositive Bergman cells and a lack of M3 muscarinic receptors in the molecular layer. These results suggest that astrogliosis which is observed first at PD21 may be responsible of the delayed effects of mercury on neurons (Roda et al., 2008).
Developmental exposure of mice from GD8 to PD21 to 50 mM HgCl2 in maternal drinking water: Female offsprings exhibited higher neuroinflammation which is associated with altered social behavior (Zhang et al., 2013).
MG17, a novel triazole derivative, was able to reduce mercury-induced upregulation of IL-1b, IL-6 and TNF-a (measured by RT-PCR) and proved to be protective against mercury-induced neurodegeneration (Matharasala et al., 2017).
Adult rats exposed to MeHg (5mg/kg bw) for 12 consecutive days exhibited piknotic nuclei in cerebellar granule cells, what was reverted by a co-administration of CA074 an inhibitor of cathepsin released by activated microglia. These observations strongly suggest that the mercury–induced neuronal pathological changes are secondary to microglial activation (Sakamoto et al., 2008).
Acrylamide
Rats exposed to acrylamide (20 mg/kg bw for 4 weeks) together with farmesol (sequiterpene) showed a downregulation of astrogliosis (i.e. decreased GFAP) and of microgliosis (i.e. decreased Iba1) and of TNF-a, Il-1b and i-NOS in cortex, hippocampus and striatum. This was associated with a marked improvement in motor coordination and a decrease in markers of oxidative stress, as compared to rats exposed to acrylamide alone (Santhanasabapathy et al., 2015).
Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
In 3D rat brain cell-cultures, co-administration of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 (10 ng/ml) together with non-cytotoxic concentrations of MeHgCl (3 x 10-7 M) for 10 days protected from the mercury-induced decreased in MAP2 immunostaining, suggesting a positive effect of IL-6, in accord with its descibed trophic activity (Eskes et al., 2002).
References
Allen, J.W., Shanker, G., Aschner, M., 2001. Methylmercury inhibits the in vitro uptake of the glutathione precursor, cystine, in astrocytes, but not in neurons. Brain Res. 894, 131-40.
Aschner, M., et al., 2007. Involvement of glutamate and reactive oxygen species in methylmercury neurotoxicity. Braz J Med Biol Res. 40, 285-91.
Banati, R.B., et al., 1993. Cytotoxicity of microglia. Glia. 7, 111-8.
Bezzi, P., Volterra, A., 2001. A neuron-glia signalling network in the active brain. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 11, 387-94.
Bilbo, S.D., Schwarz, J.M., 2009. Early-life programming of later-life brain and behavior: a critical role for the immune system. Front Behav Neurosci. 3, 14.
Brown GC, Bal-Price A. 2003. Inflammatory neurodegeneration mediated by nitric oxide, glutamate, and mitochondria. Mol Neurobiol 27(3): 325-355.
Brzozowski MJ, Jenner P, Rose S. 2015. Inhibition of i-NOS but not n-NOS protects rat primary cell cultures against MPP(+)-induced neuronal toxicity. J Neural Transm 122(6): 779-788.
Calvo-Ochoa, E., et al., 2014. Short-term high-fat-and-fructose feeding produces insulin signaling alterations accompanied by neurite and synaptic reduction and astroglial activation in the rat hippocampus. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 34, 1001-8.
Chao CC, Hu S, Peterson PK. 1995. Glia, cytokines, and neurotoxicity. CritRevNeurobiol 9: 189-205.
Dong Y, Benveniste EN. 2001. Immune Function of Astrocytes. Glia 36: 180-190.
Eskes C, Honegger P, Juillerat-Jeanneret L, Monnet-Tschudi F. 2002. Microglial reaction induced by noncytotoxic methylmercury treatment leads to neuroprotection via interactions with astrocytes and IL-6 release. Glia 37(1): 43-52.
Gehrmann J, Banati RB, Wiessnert C, Hossmann KA, Kreutzberg GW. 1995. Reactive microglia in cerebral ischaemia: An early mediator of tissue damage? NeuropatholApplNeurobiol 21: 277-289.
Harry, G.J., Kraft, A.D., 2012. Microglia in the developing brain: a potential target with lifetime effects. Neurotoxicology. 33, 191-206.
Hertz, L., Zielke, H.R., 2004. Astrocytic control of glutamatergic activity: astrocytes as stars of the show. Trends Neurosci. 27, 735-43.
Jebelli, J., et al., 2015. Glia: guardians, gluttons, or guides for the maintenance of neuronal connectivity? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1351, 1-10.
Kettenmann, H., Kirchhoff, F., Verkhratsky, A., 2013. Microglia: new roles for the synaptic stripper. Neuron. 77, 10-8.
Kraft AD, Harry GJ. 2011. Features of microglia and neuroinflammation relevant to environmental exposure and neurotoxicity. International journal of environmental research and public health 8(7): 2980-3018.
Lucas, K., Maes, M., 2013. Role of the Toll Like receptor (TLR) radical cycle in chronic inflammation: possible treatments targeting the TLR4 pathway. Mol Neurobiol. 48, 190-204.
Matharasala, G., Samala, G., Perumal, Y., 2017. MG17, a novel triazole derivative abrogated neuroinflammation and related neurodegenerative symptoms in rodents. Curr Mol Pharmacol.
Mena MA, Garcia de Yebenes J. 2008. Glial cells as players in parkinsonism: the "good," the "bad," and the "mysterious" glia. Neuroscientist 14(6): 544-560.
Nakajima K, Tohyama Y, Kohsaka S, Kurihara T. 2002. Ceramide activates microglia to enhance the production/secretion of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) without induction of deleterious factors in vitro. J Neurochem 80: 697-705.
Niranjan R. 2014. The role of inflammatory and oxidative stress mechanisms in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease: focus on astrocytes. Mol Neurobiol 49(1): 28-38.
Neher JJ, Neniskyte U, Brown GC. 2012. Primary phagocytosis of neurons by inflamed microglia: potential roles in neurodegeneration. Frontiers in pharmacology 3: 27.
Perez-Alvarez, A., Araque, A., 2013. Astrocyte-neuron interaction at tripartite synapses. Curr Drug Targets. 14, 1220-4.
Roda, E., et al., 2008. Cerebellum cholinergic muscarinic receptor (subtype-2 and -3) and cytoarchitecture after developmental exposure to methylmercury: an immunohistochemical study in rat. J Chem Neuroanat. 35, 285-94.
Sakamoto, M., et al., 2008. Possible involvement of cathepsin B released by microglia in methylmercury-induced cerebellar pathological changes in the adult rat. Neurosci Lett. 442, 292-6.
Shanker, G., Syversen, T., Aschner, M., 2003. Astrocyte-mediated methylmercury neurotoxicity. Biol Trace Elem Res. 95, 1-10.
Santhanasabapathy, R., et al., 2015. Farnesol quells oxidative stress, reactive gliosis and inflammation during acrylamide-induced neurotoxicity: Behavioral and biochemical evidence. Neuroscience. 308, 212-27.
Sidoryk-Wegrzynowicz, M., et al., 2011. Role of astrocytes in brain function and disease. Toxicol Pathol. 39, 115-23.
Taetzsch T, Block ML. 2013. Pesticides, microglial NOX2, and Parkinson's disease. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 27(2): 137-149.
Ximenes-da-Silva, A., 2016. Metal Ion Toxins and Brain Aquaporin-4 Expression: An Overview. Front Neurosci. 10, 233.
Xu, S., et al., 2015. Wogonin prevents rat dorsal root ganglion neurons death via inhibiting tunicamycin-induced ER stress in vitro. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 35, 389-398.
Yadav, S., et al., 2012. Role of secondary mediators in caffeine-mediated neuroprotection in maneb- and paraquat-induced Parkinson's disease phenotype in the mouse. Neurochem Res. 37, 875-84.
Yuste, J.E., et al., 2015. Implications of glial nitric oxide in neurodegenerative diseases. Front Cell Neurosci. 9, 322.
Zhang, Y., Bolivar, V.J., Lawrence, D.A., 2013. Maternal exposure to mercury chloride during pregnancy and lactation affects the immunity and social behavior of offspring. Toxicol Sci. 133, 101-11.
Relationship: 1688: N/A, Cell injury/death leads to Neuronal network function, Decreased
AOPs Referencing Relationship
| AOP Name | Adjacency | Weight of Evidence | Quantitative Understanding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binding of electrophilic chemicals to SH(thiol)-group of proteins and /or to seleno-proteins during brain development leads to impairment of learning and memory | adjacent | High |
Evidence Supporting Applicability of this Relationship
| Life Stage | Evidence |
|---|---|
| During brain development, adulthood and aging | High |
| Sex | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Unspecific | High |
Key Event Relationship Description
Under physiological conditions, in the developing nervous system, apoptosis occurs during the process of synaptogenesis, where competition leads to the loss of excess neurons and to the connection of the appropriate neurons (Buss et al., 2006; Mennerick and Zorumski, 2000; Oppenheim, 1991). When a stressor increases the number of apoptotic cells this KE has a negative effect on synaptogenesis as the reduced number of neurons (besides the ones that have been already eliminated through the physiological process of apoptosis) provides limited dendritic fields for receiving synaptic inputs from incoming axons. At the same time the loss of neurons also means that there are less axons to establish synaptic contacts (Olney, 2014), leading to reduced synaptogenesis. The ability of a neuron to communicate is based on neural network formation that relies on functional synapse establishment (Colón-Ramos, 2009). The main roles of synapses are the regulation of intercellular communication in the nervous system, and the information flow within neural networks. The connectivity and functionality of neural networks depends on where and when synapses are formed. Therefore, the decreased synapse formation due to cell death during the process of synaptogenesis is critical and leads to decrease of neural network formation and function in the adult brain.
Synaptic transmission and plasticity require the integrity of the anatomical substrate. The connectivity of axons emanating from one set of cells to post-synaptic side of synapse on the dendrites of the receiving cells must be intact for effective communication between neurons. Changes in the placement of cells within the network due to delays in neuronal migration, the absence of a full formation of dendritic arbors and spine upon which synaptic contacts are made, and the lagging of transmission of electrical impulses due to insufficient myelination will individually and cumulatively impair synaptic function.
Therefore, chemicals inducing neuronal cell death by apoptosis or necrosis, or interfering with a particular system of neurotransmitters, will alter network structure and function.
Evidence Supporting this KER
Biological PlausibilityRecently, Dekkers et al. 2013 have reviewed how under physiological conditions components of the apoptotic machinery in developing brain regulate synapse formation and neuronal connectivity. For example, caspase activation is known to be required for axon pruning during development to generate neuronal network (reviewed in Dekkers et al., 2013). Experimental work carried out in Drosophila melanogaster and in mammalian neurons shows that components of apoptotic machinery are involved in axonal degeneration that can consequently interfere with synapse formation (reviewed in Dekkers et al., 2013). Furthermore, Bax mutant mice studies indicate that the lack of this pro-apoptotic protein BAX leads to disruption of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells spacing and dendritic stratification that affects synapse localization and function (Chen et al., 2013).
Neuronal network formation and function are established via the process of synaptogenesis. The developmental period of synaptogenesis is critical for the formation of the basic circuitry of the nervous system, although neurons are able to form new synapses throughout life (Rodier, 1995). The brain electrical activity dependence on synapse formation is critical for proper neuronal communication.
Alterations in synaptic connectivity lead to refinement of neuronal networks during development (Cline and Haas, 2008). Indeed, knockdown of PSD-95 arrests the functional and morphological development of glutamatergic synapses (Ehrlich et al., 2007).
Studies of the last 30 years demonstrated that astrocytes possess functional receptors for neurotransmitters and respond to their stimulation via release of gliotransmitters, including glutamate. These findings have led to a new concept of neuron–glia intercommunication where astrocytes play an unsuspected dynamic role by integrating neuronal inputs and modulating synaptic activity (Rossi and Volterra, 2009). According to the concept termed "tripartite synapse", the emerging view is that brain function actually arises from the coordinated activity of a network comprising both neurons and astrocytes. Furthermore, myelinating glial cells are well-known to insulate axons and to speed up action potential propagation. Be it motor skill learning or social behaviors in higher vertebrates, proper myelination is critical in shaping brain functions. Neurons rely on their myelinating partners not only for setting conduction speed, but also for regulating the ionic environment and fueling their energy demands with metabolites. Also, long-term axonal integrity and neuronal survival are maintained by oligodendrocytes and loss of this well-coordinated axon-glial interplay contributes to brain diseases (Saab and Nave, 2017). Therefore, reduction in glial cell number and/or reduction in myelination of axons, will very much impact the neural network function.
Empirical EvidenceMercury
|
KEup Cell injury/death |
KEdown Decreased network formation and function |
species; developmental stage of exposure to stressor |
Stressor |
Dose or conc. Duration |
Protective/ aggravating evidence |
Reference |
|
Apoptosis measured by levels of Cleaved caspase3 (2x CTR values)
|
Inhibition of hippocampal-dependent memory processes at P35 (water maze) |
Rat exposed at P7 |
MeHgCl |
5 µg g-1 single injection
|
|
Falluel-Morel, 2007 |
|
Apoptosis measured by DNA laddering and electron microscopy |
Nerve fibers degeneration in peripheral nerves, sensory ganglia, root nerve, spinal cord and cerebellum |
Rat adult exposure |
MeHgCl |
4-10 mg kg-1 day-1 7-20 days subcutaneous or oral |
|
Nagashima, 1997 (review) |
|
Apoptosis measured by in situ DNA strand breaks, DNA laddering and electron microscopy |
Nerve fibers degeneration in cerebellum |
Rat adult exposure |
MeHgCl |
4 mg kg-1 day-1 20 days oral |
|
Nagashima, 1996 |
|
Necrosis and apoptosis measured by chromatin condensation on primary cultures of cortical neurons prepared from the F1 generation pups |
Fragmentation of the neuronal network (microtubule disruption) in vitro and long-term memory impairment in vivo (at P90) |
Rat pregnant exposed to mercury at GD15
|
MeHgCl |
4 and 8 mg kg-1 single gavage
|
|
Ferraro, 2009 |
|
Extensive neuronal cell loss (histopathology) in F1 generation pups (PND25) |
Decreased activity of acetylcholinesterase in F1 generation pups (PND24) and less time latency to fall in rotarod test, increased escape time latency in Morris water maze test, increased immobility time in forced-swim test |
Rat pregnant exposed to mercury from GD5 till parturition |
MeHgCl |
1.5 mg kg-1 orally |
Co-administration of fisetin (plant flavonoid) alleviated all MeHgCl effects |
Jacob, 2017 |
|
|
Reduced exploration in the open field, reduced time latency to fall |
Rat adult exposure |
HgCl2 |
0.375 mg kg-1 day-1 45 days |
|
Teixera, 2014 |
|
|
Decrease in dopaminergic system in larvae at D3 post-fertilization |
Minnow female adult exposure |
MeHg |
0.02, 0.72 ppm food dry weight 30 days |
|
Bridges, 2017 |
|
|
Decreased performance in place learning, longer immobility time in the forced swimming test |
Mice pregnant exposed from GD7 to P7 |
MeHg
|
0.5 mg kg-1 day-1 in drinking water |
|
Onishchenko, 2007 |
|
Apoptosis observed 7 days after exposure |
Degeneration of the dopaminergic system observed 7 days after exposure |
Rat adult exposure |
Acrolein |
Single intranigral infusion of 15, 50, 150 nmoles |
|
Wang, 2017 |
Acrylamide
No publications found to support this KE
Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
Ogawa et al. reported decreased apoptosis and an increase in the number of Gabaergic interneurons.
References
Bridges, K., Venables, B., Roberts, A., 2017. Effects of dietary methylmercury on the dopaminergic system of adult fathead minnows and their offspring. Environ Toxicol Chem 36, 1077-1084.
Buss, R.R., Sun, W., Oppenheim, R.W., 2006. Adaptive roles of programmed cell death during nervous system development. Annu Rev Neurosci 29, 1-35.
Chen, S.K., Chew, K.S., McNeill, D.S., Keeley, P.W., Ecker, J.L., Mao, B.Q., Pahlberg, J., Kim, B., Lee, S.C., Fox, M.A., Guido, W., Wong, K.Y., Sampath, A.P., Reese, B.E., Kuruvilla, R., Hattar, S., 2013. Apoptosis regulates ipRGC spacing necessary for rods and cones to drive circadian photoentrainment. Neuron 77, 503-515.
Cline, H., Haas, K., 2008. The regulation of dendritic arbor development and plasticity by glutamatergic synaptic input: a review of the synaptotrophic hypothesis. J Physiol 586, 1509-1517.
Colon-Ramos, D.A., 2009. Synapse formation in developing neural circuits. Curr Top Dev Biol 87, 53-79.
Dekkers, M.P., Nikoletopoulou, V., Barde, Y.A., 2013. Cell biology in neuroscience: Death of developing neurons: new insights and implications for connectivity. J Cell Biol 203, 385-393.
Ehrlich, I., Klein, M., Rumpel, S., Malinow, R., 2007. PSD-95 is required for activity-driven synapse stabilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104, 4176-4181.
Falluel-Morel, A., Sokolowski, K., Sisti, H.M., Zhou, X., Shors, T.J., Dicicco-Bloom, E., 2007. Developmental mercury exposure elicits acute hippocampal cell death, reductions in neurogenesis, and severe learning deficits during puberty. J Neurochem 103, 1968-1981.
Ferraro, L., Tomasini, M.C., Tanganelli, S., Mazza, R., Coluccia, A., Carratu, M.R., Gaetani, S., Cuomo, V., Antonelli, T., 2009. Developmental exposure to methylmercury elicits early cell death in the cerebral cortex and long-term memory deficits in the rat. Int J Dev Neurosci 27, 165-174.
Jacob, S., Thangarajan, S., 2017. Effect of Gestational Intake of Fisetin (3,3',4',7-Tetrahydroxyflavone) on Developmental Methyl Mercury Neurotoxicity in F1 Generation Rats. Biol Trace Elem Res 177, 297-315.
Mennerick, S., Zorumski, C.F., 2000. Neural activity and survival in the developing nervous system. Mol Neurobiol 22, 41-54.
Nagashima, K., 1997. A review of experimental methylmercury toxicity in rats: neuropathology and evidence for apoptosis. Toxicol Pathol 25, 624-631.
Nagashima, K., Fujii, Y., Tsukamoto, T., Nukuzuma, S., Satoh, M., Fujita, M., Fujioka, Y., Akagi, H., 1996. Apoptotic process of cerebellar degeneration in experimental methylmercury intoxication of rats. Acta Neuropathol 91, 72-77.
Ogawa, B., Ohishi, T., Wang, L., Takahashi, M., Taniai, E., Hayashi, H., Mitsumori, K., Shibutani, M., 2011. Disruptive neuronal development by acrylamide in the hippocampal dentate hilus after developmental exposure in rats. Arch Toxicol 85, 987-994.
Olney, J.W., 2014. Focus on apoptosis to decipher how alcohol and many other drugs disrupt brain development. Front Pediatr 2, 81.
Onishchenko, N., Tamm, C., Vahter, M., Hokfelt, T., Johnson, J.A., Johnson, D.A., Ceccatelli, S., 2007. Developmental exposure to methylmercury alters learning and induces depression-like behavior in male mice. Toxicol Sci 97, 428-437.
Oppenheim, R.W., 1991. Cell death during development of the nervous system. Annu Rev Neurosci 14, 453-501.
Perea, G., Navarrete, M., Araque, A., 2009. Tripartite synapses: astrocytes process and control synaptic information. Trends Neurosci 32, 421-431.
Rodier, P.M., 1995. Developing brain as a target of toxicity. Environ Health Perspect 103 Suppl 6, 73-76.
Rossi, D., Volterra, A., 2009. Astrocytic dysfunction: insights on the role in neurodegeneration. Brain Res Bull 80, 224-232.
Saab, A.S., Nave, K.A., 2017. Myelin dynamics: protecting and shaping neuronal functions. Curr Opin Neurobiol 47, 104-112.
Teixeira, F.B., Fernandes, R.M., Farias-Junior, P.M., Costa, N.M., Fernandes, L.M., Santana, L.N., Silva-Junior, A.F., Silva, M.C., Maia, C.S., Lima, R.R., 2014. Evaluation of the effects of chronic intoxication with inorganic mercury on memory and motor control in rats. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11, 9171-9185.
Wang, Y.T., Lin, H.C., Zhao, W.Z., Huang, H.J., Lo, Y.L., Wang, H.T., Lin, A.M., 2017. Acrolein acts as a neurotoxin in the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system of rat: involvement of alpha-synuclein aggregation and programmed cell death. Sci Rep 7, 45741.
Relationship: 359: Neuronal network function, Decreased leads to Impairment, Learning and memory
AOPs Referencing Relationship
Evidence Supporting Applicability of this Relationship
| Life Stage | Evidence |
|---|---|
| During brain development | High |
| Sex | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Mixed | High |
Synaptic transmission and plasticity are achieved via mechanisms common across taxonomies. LTP has been recorded in aplysia, lizards, turtles, birds, mice, guinea pigs, rabbits and rats. Deficiencies in hippocampally based learning and memory following developmental hypothyroidism have been documented mainly in rodents and humans.
Key Event Relationship Description
Learning and memory is one of the outcomes of the functional expression of neurons and neural networks from mammalian to invertebrates. Damage or destruction of neurons by chemical compounds during development when they are in the process of synapses formation, integration and formation of neural networks, will derange the organization and function of these networks, thereby setting the stage for subsequent impairment of learning and memory. Exposure to the potential developmental toxicants during neuronal differentiation and synaptogenesis will increase risk of functional neuronal network damage leading to learning and memory impairment.
Impairments in learning and memory are measured using behavioral techniques. It is well accepted that these alterations in behavior are the result of structural or functional changes in neurocircuitry. Functional impairments are often measured using field potentials of critical synaptic circuits in hippocampus and cortex. A number of studies have been performed in rodent models that reveal deficits in both excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission in the hippocampus as a result of developmental thyroid insufficiency (Wang et al., 2012; Oerbeck et al., 2003; Wheeler et al., 2011; Wheeler et al., 2015; Willoughby et al., 2014; Davenport and Dorcey, 1972; Tamasy et al., 1986; Akaike, 1991; Axelstad et al., 2008; Gilbert and Sui, 2006; Gilbert et al., 2016; Gilbert, 2011; Gilbert et al., 2016). A well-established functional readout of memory at the synaptic level is known as long-term potentiation (LTP) (i.e., a persistent strengthening of synapses based on recent patterns of activity). Deficiencies in LTP are generally regarded as potential substrates of learning and memory impairments. In rodent models where synaptic function is impaired by TH deficiencies, deficits in hippocampus-mediated memory are also prevalent (Gilbert and Sui, 2006; Gilbert et al., 2016; Gilbert, 2011; Gilbert et al., 2016).
Evidence Supporting this KER
A number of studies have consistently reported alterations in synaptic transmission resulting from developmental TH disruption, and leading to decreased cognition.
Biological PlausibilityLong-term potentiation (LTP) is a long-lasting increase in synaptic efficacy (not always and not always high frequency stimulation leads to LTP), and its discovery suggested that changes in synaptic strength could provide the substrate for learning and memory (reviewed in Lynch, 2004). Moreover, LTP is intimately related to the theta rhythm, an oscillation long associated with learning. Learning-induced enhancement in neuronal excitability, a measurement of neural network function, has also been shown in hippocampal neurons following classical conditioning in several experimental approaches (reviewed in Saar and Barkai, 2003).
On the other hand, memory requires the increase in magnitude of EPSCs to be developed quickly and to be persistent for few weeks at least without disturbing already potentiated contacts. Once again, a substantial body of evidence has demonstrated that tight connection between LTP and diverse instances of memory exist (reviewed in Lynch, 2004).
A review on Morris water maze (MWM) as a tool to investigate spatial learning and memory in laboratory rats also pointed out that the disconnection between neuronal networks rather than the brain damage of certain regions is responsible for the impairment of MWM performance. Functional integrated neural networks that involve the coordination action of different brain regions are consequently important for spatial learning and MWM performance (D'Hooge and De Deyn, 2001).
Moreover, it is well accepted that alterations in synaptic transmission and plasticity contribute to deficits in cognitive function. There are a number of studies that have linked exposure to TPO inhibitors (e.g., PTU, MMI), as well as iodine deficient diets, to changes in serum TH levels, which result in alterations in both synaptic function and cognitive behaviors (Akaike et al., 1991; Vara et al., 2002; Gilbert and Sui, 2006; Axelstad et al., 2008; Taylor et al., 2008; Gilbert, 2011; Gilbert et al., 2016), described in the indirect KER "Decrease of TH synthesis leads to learning and memory deficits".
Empirical EvidenceDevelopmental hypothyroidism reduces the functional integrity in brain regions critical for learning and memory. Neurophysiological indices of synaptic transmission of excitatory and inhibitory circuitry are impaired in the hippocampus of hypothyroid animals. Both hippocampal regions (area CA1 and dentate gyrus) exhibit alterations in excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission following reductions in serum TH in the pre and early postnatal period (Vara et al., 2002; Sui and Gilbert, 2003; Sui et al., 2005; Gilbert and Sui, 2006; Taylor et al., 2008; Gilbert, 2011; Gilbert et al., 2016). These alterations persist into adulthood despite a recovery to euthyroid conditions in blood. The latter observation indicates that these alterations represent permanent changes in brain function caused by transient hormones insufficiencies induced during critical window of development.
Because the adult hippocampus is involved in learning and memory, it is a brain region of remarkable plasticity. Use-dependent synaptic plasticity is critical during brain development for synaptogenesis and fine tuning of synaptic connectivity. In the adult brain, similar plasticity mechanisms underlie use-dependency that underlies learning and memory, as exhibited in LTP model of synaptic memory. Hypothyroidism during development reduces the capacity for synaptic plasticity in juvenile and adult offspring (Vara et al., 2002; Sui and Gilbert, 2003; Dong et al., 2005; Sui et al., 2005; Gilbert and Sui, 2006; Taylor et al., 2008; Gilbert, 2011; Gilbert et al., 2016). Decrease of neuronal network function and plasticity are observed coincident with deficits in learning tasks that require the hippocampus.
- Wang et al., 2012: This study showed that maternal subclinical hypothyroidism impairs spatial learning in the offspring, as well as the efficacy and optimal time of T4 treatment in pregnancy. Female adult Wistar rats were randomly divided into six groups: control, hypothyroid (H), subclinical hypothyroid (SCH) and SCH treated with T4, starting from GD10, GD13 and GD17, respectively, to restore normal TH levels. Results indicate that progenies of SCH and H groups demonstrated significantly longer mean latency in the water maze test (on the 2nd training day, latency was ~83% higher in H group, and ~50% higher in SCH), and a lower amplification percentage of the amplitude (~15% lower in H group, and 12% lower in SCH), and slope of the field excitatory postsynaptic potential (fEPSP) recording (~20% lower in H group, and 17% lower in SCH), compared to control group. T4 treatment at GD10 and GD13 significantly shortened mean latency and increased the amplification percentage of the amplitude and slope of the fEPSPs of the progeny of rats with subclinical hypothyroidism. However, T4 treatment at GD17 showed only minimal effects on spatial learning in the offspring. Altogether these data indicate direct correlation between decrease of neural network function and learning and memory deficits.
- Liu et al., 2010 This study assessed the effects of hypothyroidism in 60 female rats who were divided into three groups: (i) maternal subclinical hypothyroidism (total thyroidectomy with T4 infusion), (ii) maternal hypothyroidism (total thyroidectomy without T4 infusion), and (iii) control (sham operated). The Morris water maze tests revealed that pups from the subclinical hypothyroidism group showed long-term memory deficits, and a trend toward short-term memory deficits.
- Gilbert and Sui, 2006 Administration of 3 or 10 ppm PTU to pregnant and lactating dams via the drinking water from GD6 until PND30 caused a 47% and 65% reduction in serum T4, in the dams of the low and high-dose groups, respectively. Baseline synaptic transmission was impaired in PTU-exposed animals: mean EPSP slope (by ~60% with 10 ppm PTU) and population spike amplitudes (by ~70% with 10 ppm PTU) in the dentate gyrus were reduced in a dose-dependent manner in adult offspring of PTU-treated dams. High-dose animals (10 ppm) demonstrated very little evidence of learning despite 16 consecutive days of training (~5-fold higher mean latency to find the hidden platform, used as an index of learning).
- Gilbert et al., 2016 Exposure to PTU during development produced dose-dependent reductions in mRNA expression of nerve growth factor (Ngf) in whole hippocampus of neonates. These changes in basal expression persisted to adulthood despite the return to euthyroid conditions in blood. Developmental PTU treatment dramatically reduced the activity-dependent expression of neurotrophins and related genes in neonate hippocampus and was accompanied by deficits in hippocampal-based learning (e.g., mean latency to find a hidden platform, at 2nd trial resulted ~60% higher in rats treated with 10 ppm PTU).
- Gilbert, 2011 Trace fear conditioning deficits to context and to cue reported in animals treated with PTU and who also displayed synaptic transmission and LTP deficits in hippocampus. Baseline synaptic transmission was impaired in PTU-exposed animals (by ~50% in animal treated with 3 ppm PTU). EPSP slope amplitudes in the dentate gyrus were reduced in a dose-dependent manner in adult offspring of PTU-treated dams.
BPA, an environmental toxicant known to inhibit NIS-mediated iodide uptake (Wu Y et al., 2016) has been found to cause learning and memory deficits in rodents as described below:
- Jang et al., 2012 In this study, pregnant female C57BL/6 mice (F0) were exposed to BPA (0.1-10 mg/kg) from gestation day 6 to 17, and female offspring (F2) from F1 generation mice were analysed. Exposure of F0 mice to BPA (10 mg/kg) decreased hippocampal neurogenesis (~ 30% decrease of hippocampal BrdU+ cells vs control) in F2 female mice. High-dose BPA (10 mg/kg) caused neurocognitive deficit (i.e., reduced memory retention) as shown by passive avoidance testing (~ 33% decrease vs control) in F2 mice. Furthermore, 10 mg/kg BPA decreased the hippocampal levels of BDNF (~ 35% lower vs control) in F2 mice. These results suggest that BPA exposure (NIS inhibitor) in pregnant mothers could decrease hippocampal neurogenesis (decreased number of neurons) and cognitive function in future generations.
In humans, the data linking these two specific KE are much more limited, but certainly clear reductions in IQ, with specific impairments in hippocampus-mediated functions have been observed.
- Wheeler et al., 2015 This study assessed hippocampal functioning in adolescents with congenital hypothyroidism (CH), using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). 14 adolescents with CH and 14 typically developing controls (TDC) were studied. Hippocampal activation was greater for pairs than items in both groups, but this difference was only significant in TDC. When the groups were directly compared, the right anterior hippocampus was the primary region in which the TDC and CH groups differed for this pair memory effect. Results signify that adolescents with CH show abnormal hippocampal functioning during verbal memory processing, in order to compensate for the effects induced by TH deficit in the brain.
- Wheeler et al., 2012 In this study hippocampal neuronal network function was measured based on synaptic performance using fMRI and was altered while subjects engaged in a memory task. Data showed paired word recognition deficits in adolescents with congenital hypothyroidism (N = 14; age range, 11.5-14.7 years) compared with controls (N = 15; age range, 11.2-15.5 years), with no impairment on simple word lists. Analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging showed that adolescents with congenital hypothyroidism had both increased magnitude of hippocampal activation relative to controls and bilateral hippocampal activation when only the left was observed in controls. Furthermore, the increased activation in the congenital hypothyroidism group was correlated with the severity of the hypothyroidism experienced early in life.
- Willoughby et al., 2013 Analogously, in this study, fMRI revealed increased hippocampus activation with word pair recognition task in CH and children born to women with hypothyroxinemia during midgestation. These differences in functional activation were not seen with single word recognition, but were revealed when retention of word pair associations was probed. The latter is a task requiring engagement of the hippocampus.
A series of important findings suggest that the biochemical changes that happen after induction of LTP also occur during memory acquisition, showing temporality between the two KEs (reviewed in Lynch, 2004).
- Morris et al., 1986 This study found that blocking the NMDA receptor of the neuronal network with AP5 inhibits spatial learning in rats. Most importantly, in the same study they measured brain electrical activity and recorded that this agent also inhibits LTP, however, they have not proven that spatial learning and LTP inhibition are causally related.
Since then a number of NMDA receptor antagonists have been studied towards their ability to induce impairment of learning and memory. It is worth mentioning that similar findings have been found in human subjects:
- Grunwald et al., 1999 By combining behavioural and electrophysiological data from patients with temporal lobe epilepsy exposed to ketamine, involvement of NMDA receptors in human memory processes was demonstrated.
The last KE preceding the AO (learning and memory deficits), i.e. "Decreased Neural Network Function", is also common to the AOP 13, entitled "Chronic binding of antagonist to N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) during brain development induces impairment of learning and memory abilities" (https://aopwiki.org/aops/13). In this AOP 13, data on lead (Pb) exposure as reference chemical are reported. While these studies do not refer to TH disruption, they provide empirical support for the same KER described in the present AOP.
Pb2+: Exposure to low levels of Pb2+, during early development, has been implicated in long-lasting behavioural abnormalities and cognitive deficits in children (Needleman et al., 1975; Needleman and Gatsonis, 1990; Bellinger et al., 1991; 1992; Baghurst et al., 1992; Leviton et al., 1993; Needleman et al., 1996; Finkelstein et al., 1998; Lanphear et al., 2000; 2005; Canfield et al., 2003; Bellinger 2004; Lanphear et al., 2005; Surkan et al., 2007; Jusko et al., 2008; Neal and Guilarte, 2010) and experimental animals (Brockel and Cory-Slechta, 1998; Murphy and Regan, 1999; Moreira et al., 2001). Multiple lines of evidence suggest that Pb2+ can impair hippocampus-mediated learning in animal models (reviewed in Toscano and Guilarte, 2005).
- Jett et al., 1997 Female rats exposed to Pb2+ through gestation and lactation have shown more severe impairment of memory than male rats with similar Pb2+ exposures.
- De Souza Lisboa et al., 2005 This study reported that exposure to Pb2+ during both pregnancy and lactation caused depressive-like behaviour (detected in the forced swimming test) in female but not male rats.
- Anderson et al., 2012 This study investigated the neurobehavioral outcomes in Pb2+-exposed rats (250, 750 and 1500 ppm Pb2+ acetate in food) during gestation and through weaning and demonstrated that these outcomes are very much influenced by sex and rearing environment. In females, Pb2+ exposure lessened some of the benefits of enriched environment on learning, whereas, in males, enrichment does help to overcome detrimental effects of Pb2+ on learning. Regarding reference memory, environmental enrichment has not been beneficial in females when exposure to Pb2+ occurs, in contrast to males.
- Jaako-Movits et al., 2005 Wistar rat pups were exposed to 0.2% Pb2+ via their dams' drinking water from PND 1 to PND 21 and directly via drinking water from weaning until PND 30. At PND 60 and 80, the neurobehavioural assessment has revealed that developmental Pb2+ exposure induces persistent increase in the level of anxiety and inhibition of contextual fear conditioning. The same behavioural syndrome in rats has been described in Salinas and Huff, 2002.
- Finkelstein et al., 1998 These observations are in agreement with observations on humans, as children exposed to low levels of Pb2+ displayed attention deficit, increased emotional reactivity and impaired memory and learning.
- Kumar and Desiraju, 1992 In Wistar rats fed with lead acetate (400 µg/g body weight/day) from PND 2 until PND 60, EEG findings showed statistically significant reduction in the delta, theta, alpha and beta band EEG spectral power in motor cortex and hippocampus, but not in delta and beta bands power of motor cortex in wakeful state. After 40 days of recovery, animals were assessed for their neurobehaviour, and revealed that Pb2+ treated animals showed more time and sessions in attaining criterion of learning than controls.
Further data obtained using animal behavioral techniques demonstrate that NMDA mediated synaptic transmission is decreased by Pb2+ exposure (Cory-Slechta, 1995; Cohn and Cory-Slechta, 1993 and 1994).
- Xiao et al., 2014 Rat pups from parents exposed to 2 mM PbCl2 three weeks before mating until their weaning (pre-weaning Pb2+) and weaned pups exposed to 2 mM PbCl2 for nine weeks (post-weaning Pb2+) were assessed for their spatial learning and memory by MWM on PND 85-90. The study revealed that both rat pups in pre-weaning Pb2+ and post-weaning Pb2+ groups performed significantly worse than those in the control group. The number of synapses in pre-weaning Pb2+ group increased significantly, but it was still less than that of control group. The number of synapses in post-weaning Pb2+ group was also less than that of control group, although the number of synapses had no differences between post-weaning Pb2+ and control groups before MWM. In both pre-weaning Pb2+ and post-weaning Pb2+ groups, synaptic structural parameters such as thickness of postsynaptic density (PSD), length of synaptic active zone and synaptic curvature increased, whereas width of synaptic cleft decreased compared to controls.
The last KE preceding the AO (learning and memory deficits), i.e. "Decreased Neural Network Function", is also common to the AOP 17, entitled " Binding of electrophilic chemicals to SH(thiol)-group of proteins and /or to seleno-proteins during brain development leads to impairment of learning and memory" (https://aopwiki.org/aops/17). In this AOP 17, data on mercury exposure as reference chemical are reported. While these studies do not refer to TH disruption, they provide empirical support for the same KER described in the present AOP.
Sokolowski et al. 2013. Rats at postnatal day 7 received a single injection of methylmercury (0.6 microgr/g, that caused caspase activation in the hilus of granule cell layer in hippocampus. At PD 21, a decrease in cell number or 22% in hilus and of 27% in granule cell layer, as well as a decreased proliferation of neural precursor cells of 25% were observed. This was associated with a decrease of spatial memory as assessed by Morris water maze.
Eddins et al., 2008. Mice exposed during postnatal week 1-3 to 2-5 mg/kg mercury chloride in 0.01 ml/g of NaCl injectd s.c. The behavioral tests at 3 months of age revealed learning deficits (radial maze), which was associated with increased levels of monoamines in frontal cortex.
Zanoli et al., 1994. Single injection of methylmercury (8 mg/kg by gavage) at gestational day 15. Offsprings analyzed at 14, 21, and 60 days of age exhibited a decrease in the number of muscarinic receptors at 14 and 21 days and a decrease in avoidance latency at 60 days, indicating learning and memory deficits.
Zanoli et al., 2001. Single injection of methylmercury (8 mg/kg) at gestational day 8. Brain was removed at PD 21 and 60. An increase in tryptophan level in hippocampus was detected at both days. At PD 21, a decrease in anthranilic acid and an increase in quinolinic acid was found. No change in glutamic acid nor in aspartic acid were detected.
Montgomery et al., 2008. C57/B6 mice exposed during pregnancy (GD 8-18) with food containing methylmercury (0.01 mg/kg body wheight). Tested when adult, they showed deficits in motor function, coordination, overall activity and impairment in reference memory.
Glover et al., 2009. Balb mice exposed to methylmercury in diet (low dose: 1.5 mg/kg; high dose: 4.5 mg/kg) during 11 weeks (6 weeks prior mating, 3 weeks during gestation and 2 weeks post-partum). Offsprings tested at PD 15 showed an accumulation of Hg in brain (0.08 mg/kg for low dose and 0.25 mg/kg for the high dose). At hte cellular level, there was alterations in gene expression for cytoskeleton, cell processes, cell adhesion, cell differentiation, development), which could be all involved in cellular network formation. This was associated with behavioral impairment, i.e. a decrease in exploratory activity measured in open field.
Onishchenko et al., 2007. Pregnant mice received 0.5 mg methylmercury/kg/day in drinking water from gestational dy 7 until day 7 after delivery. Offspring behavior was monitored at 5-15 and 26-36 weeks of age. Mercury-induced alterations in reference memory were detected.
Cagiano et al., 1990. Pregnant rat received at GD 15 8mg/kg of methylmercury by gavage. Offsprings were tested at day 16, 21 and 60. A reduced functional activity of glutamatergic system associated with disturbances in learning and memory were observed.
Rice, 1992. Female monkeys exposed to 10, 25 and 50 microg/kg/day to methylmercury. Male unexposed. Infants separated from mother at birth and exposed to similar doses did not show gross intellectual impairment, but interferences with temporal discrimination.
Sahin et al., 2016. Exposure of rat pups for 5 weeks or 5 months with mercury chloride (4.6 microg/kg as first injection, followed each day by 0.07 microg/kg/day). Learning and memory impairment measured by passive avoidance and Morris-water-maze was found in 5-weeks group, but not in the 5-month group. This was accompanied by hearing loss.
In humans:
Orenstein et al., 2014. Maternal peripartum hair mercury level was measured to assess prenatal mercury exposure. The concentrations of mercury was found in the range of 0.3-5.1 microg/g, similar to fish eating population in US. However, statistical analyses revealed that each microg/g increase in hair Hg was associated with a decrement in visula memory, learning and verbal memory.
Yorifuji et al., 2011. A survey of the Minamata exposed population made in 1971 to assess pre- and post-natal exposure revealed a methylmercury-induced impairment of intelligence as well as behavioral dysfunction.
Uncertainties and InconsistenciesOne of the most difficult issues for neuroscientists is to link neuronal network function to cognition, including learning and memory. It is still unclear what modifications of neuronal circuits need to happen in order to alter motor behaviour as it is recorded in a learning and memory test (Mayford et al., 2012), meaning that there is no clear understanding about the how these two KEs are connected.
Several epidemiological studies where Pb2+ exposure levels have been studied in relation to neurobehavioural alterations in children have been reviewed in Koller et al. 2004. This review has concluded that in some occasions there is negative correlation between Pb2+ dose and cognitive deficits of the subjects due to high influence of social and parenting factors in cognitive ability like learning and memory (Koller et al. 2004), meaning that not always Pb2+ exposure is positively associated with learning and memory impairment in children.
The direct relationship of alterations in neural network function and specific cognitive deficits is difficult to ascertain given the many forms that learning and memory can take and the complexity of synaptic interactions in even the simplest brain circuit. Linking of neurophysiological assessments to learning and memory processes have, by necessity, been made across simple monosynaptic connections and largely focused on the hippocampus. Alterations in synaptic function have been found in the absence of behavioral impairments. This may result from measuring only one component in the complex brain circuitry that underlies 'cognition', behavioral tests that are not sufficiently sensitive for the detection of subtle cognitive impairments, and behavioral plasticity whereby tasks are solved by the animal via different strategies developed as a consequence of developmental insult.
Finally, in order to provide empirical support for this KER, data on the effects of lead (Pb) exposure are reported. However, Pb exposure is not always associated with learning and memory impairment in children. In this regard, Koller's review has commented that in some occasions, low-level Pb dose and cognitive deficits of the subjects are negatively correlated, and this may be due to the high influence of social and parenting factors in cognitive ability, like learning and memory (Koller et al., 2004).
Mercury
Olczak et al., 2001. Postnatal exposure of rats to Thimerosal (4 injections with 12, 240, 1440 and 3000 microgHg/kg per injection). Effects were measured in adult, which exhibited alterations in dopaminergic system with decline in the density of striatal D2 receptors, with a higher sensitivity for males. No alterations in spatial learning and memory was observed, but impairments of motor activity, increased anxiety (open fiel measurment), which are other symptoms of autism spectrum disorder.
Franco et al., 2006. Lactational exposure of mice to methylmercury in drinking water (10 mg/L). Analysis at weaning revealed only impairment in motor performances.
Franco et al., 2007. Lactational exposure of mice with mercury chloride (0.5 and 1.5 mg/kg, i.p. injection once a day).. At weaning , animals exhibited an increased level of mercury in cerebellum associated with motor deficit.
References
Akaike M, Kato, N., Ohno, H., Kobayashi, T. (1991). Hyperactivity and spatial maze learning impairment of adult rats with temporary neonatal hypothyroidism. Neurotoxicol Teratol 13:317-322.
Anderson DW, Pothakos K, Schneider JS. (2012). Sex and rearing condition modify the effects of perinatal lead exposure on learning and memory. Neurotoxicology 33: 985-995.
Axelstad M, Hansen PR, Boberg J, Bonnichsen M, Nellemann C, Lund SP, Hougaard KS, U H. (2008). Developmental neurotoxicity of Propylthiouracil (PTU) in rats: relationship between transient hypothyroxinemia during development and long-lasting behavioural and functional changes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 232:1-13.
Baghurst PA, Tong S, Sawyer MG, Burns J, McMichael AJ. (1992). Environmental exposure to lead and children’s intelligence at the age of seven years. The Port Pirie Cohort Study. N Engl J Med. 327: 1279-1284.
Bellinger D, Sloman J, Leviton A, Rabinowitz M, Needleman HL, Waternaux C. (1991). Low-level lead exposure and children's cognitive function in the preschool years. Pediatrics. 87: 219-227.
Bellinger DC, Stiles KM, Needleman HL. (1992). Low-level lead exposure, intelligence and academic achievement: a long-term follow-up study. Pediatrics. 90: 855-861.
Bellinger DC. (2004). Lead. Pediatrics 113: 1016-1022.
Brockel BJ, Cory-Slechta DA. (1998). Lead, attention, and impulsive behavior: changes in a fixed-ratio waiting-for-reward paradigm. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 60: 545-552.
Cagiano, R., et al. (1990). "Evidence that exposure to methyl mercury during gestation induces behavioral and neurochemical changes in offspring of rats." Neurotoxicol Teratol 12(1): 23-28.
Canfield RL, Henderson CR Jr, Cory-Slechta D, Cox C, Jusko TA, Lanphear BP. (2003). Intellectual impairment in children with blood lead concentrations below 10 μg per deciliter. N Engl J Med. 348: 1517-1526.
Cao X, Huang S, Ruan D. (2008). Enriched environment restores impaired hippocampal long-term potentiation and water maze performance induced by developmental lead exposure in rats. Dev Psychobiol. 50: 307-313.
Cohn J, Cory-Slechta DA. (1993). Subsensitivity of lead-exposed rats to the accuracy-impairing and rate-altering effects of MK-801 on a multiple schedule of repeated learning and performance. Brain Res. 600: 208-218.
Cohn J, Cory-Slechta DA. (1994). Lead exposure potentiates the effects of N-methyl-D-asparate on repeated learning. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 16: 455-465.
Cory-Slechta DA. (1995). MK-801 subsensitivity following postweaning lead exposure. Neurotoxicology 16: 83-95.
de Souza Lisboa S F, Gonzalves G, Komatsu F, Salci Queiroz CA, Aparecido Almeida A, Gastaldello Moreira EN. (2005). Developmental lead exposure induces depressive-like behavior in female rats. Drug Chem Toxicol. 28: 67-77.
D'Hooge R, De Deyn PP. (2001). Applications of the Morris water maze in the study of learning and memory. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 36: 60-90.
Dong J, Yin H, Liu W, Wang P, Jiang Y, Chen J. (2005). Congenital iodine deficiency and hypothyroidism impair LTP and decrease C-fos and C-jun expression in rat hippocampus. Neurotoxicology 26:417-426.
Eddins, D., et al. (2008). "Mercury-induced cognitive impairment in metallothionein-1/2 null mice." Neurotoxicol Teratol 30(2): 88-95.
Finkelstein Y, Markowitz ME, Rosen JF. (1998). Low-level lead-induced neurotoxicity in children: an update on central nervous system effects. Brain Res Rev. 27: 168-176.
Franco, J. L., et al. (2006). "Cerebellar thiol status and motor deficit after lactational exposure to methylmercury." Environ Res 102(1): 22-28.
Franco, J. L., et al. (2007). "Lactational exposure to inorganic mercury: evidence of neurotoxic effects." Neurotoxicol Teratol 29(3): 360-367.
Gilbert ME, Kelly ME, Samsam TE, Goodman JH. (2005). Chronic developmental lead exposure reduces neurogenesis in adult rat hippocampus but does not impair spatial learning. Toxicol Sci. 86: 365-374.
Gilbert ME. (2011). Impact of low-level thyroid hormone disruption induced by propylthiouracil on brain development and function. Toxicol Sci 124:432-445.
Gilbert ME, Sanchez-Huerta K, Wood C. (2016). Mild Thyroid Hormone Insufficiency During Development Compromises Activity-Dependent Neuroplasticity in the Hippocampus of Adult Male Rats. Endocrinology 157:774-787.
Gilbert ME, Sui L. (2006). Dose-dependent reductions in spatial learning and synaptic function in the dentate gyrus of adult rats following developmental thyroid hormone insufficiency. Brain Res 1069:10-22.
Glover, C. N., et al. (2009). "Methylmercury speciation influences brain gene expression and behavior in gestationally-exposed mice pups." Toxicol Sci 110(2): 389-400.
Grunwald T, Beck H, Lehnertz K, Blümcke I, Pezer N, Kurthen M, Fernández G, Van Roost D, Heinze HJ, Kutas M, Elger CE. (1999). Evidence relating human verbal memory to hippocampal N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 96: 12085-12089.
Jaako-Movits K, Zharkovsky T, Romantchik O, Jurgenson M, Merisalu E, Heidmets LT, Zharkovsky A. (2005). Developmental lead exposure impairs contextual fear conditioning and reduces adult hippocampal neurogenesis in the rat brain. Int J Dev Neurosci. 23: 627-635.
Jang YJ, Park HR, Kim TH, Yang WJ, Lee JJ, Choi SY, Oh SB, Lee E, Park JH, Kim HP, Kim HS, Lee J. (2012). High dose bisphenol A impairs hippocampal neurogenesis in female mice across generations. Toxicology. Jun 14;296(1-3):73-82.
Jett DA, Kuhlmann AC, Farmer SJ, Guilarte TR. (1997). Age-dependent effects of developmental lead exposure on performance in the Morris water maze. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 57: 271-279.
Jusko TA, Henderson CR, Lanphear BP, Cory-Slechta DA, Parsons PJ, Canfield RL. (2008). Blood lead concentrations < 10 microg/dL and child intelligence at 6 years of age. Environ Health Perspect 116:243-248.
Koller K, Brown T, Spurgeon A, Levy L. (2004). Recent developments in low-level lead exposure and intellectual impairment in children. Environ Health Perspect. 112: 987-994.
Kumar MV, Desiraju T. (1992). EEG spectral power reduction and learning disability in rats exposed to lead through postnatal developing age. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 36: 15-20.
Lanphear BP, Dietrich K, Auinger P, Cox C. (2000). Cognitive deficits associated with blood lead concentrations <10 microg/dL in US children and adolescents. Public Health Rep. 115: 521-529.
Lanphear BP, Hornung R, Khoury J, Yolton K, Baghurst P, Bellinger DC, Canfield RL, Dietrich KN, Bornschein R, Greene T, Rothenberg SJ, Needleman HL, Schnaas L, Wasserman G, Graziano J, Roberts R. (2005). Low-level environmental lead exposure and children’s intellectual function: an international pooled analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 113: 894-899.
Leviton A, Bellinger D, Allred EH, Rabinowitz M, Needleman H, Schoenbaum S. (1993). Pre- and postnatal low-level lead exposure and children's dysfunction in school. Environ Res 60:30-43.
Liu D, Teng W, Shan Z, Yu X, Gao Y, Wang S, Fan C, Wang H, Zhang H. (2010). The effect of maternal subclinical hypothyroidism during pregnancy on brain development in rat offspring. Thyroid 20:909–915.
Lynch MA. (2004). Long-term potentiation and memory. Physiol Rev. 84: 87-136.
Mayford M, Siegelbaum SA, Kandel ER. (2012). Synapses and memory storage. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 4. pii: a005751.
Montgomery, K. S., et al. (2008). "Chronic, low-dose prenatal exposure to methylmercury impairs motor and mnemonic function in adult C57/B6 mice." Behav Brain Res 191(1): 55-61.
Moreira EG, Vassilieff I, Vassilieff VS. (2001). Developmental lead exposure: behavioral alterations in the short and long term. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 23: 489-495.
Morris RG, Anderson E, Lynch GS, Baudry M. (1986). Selective impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, AP5. Nature 319: 774-776.
Murphy KJ, Regan CM. (1999). Low level lead exposure in the early postnatal period results in persisting neuroplastic deficits associated with memory consolidation. J Neurochem. 72: 2099-2104.
Neal AP, Guilarte TR. (2010). Molecular Neurobiology of Lead (Pb2+): Effects on Synaptic Function. Mol Neurobiol. 42: 151-160.
Needleman HL, Epstein S, Carnow B, Scanlon J, Parkinson D, Samuels S, Mazzochi A, David O. (1975). Letter: Blood-lead levels, behaviour and intelligence. Lancet 1: 751-752.
Needleman HL, Gatsonis CA. (1990). Low-level lead exposure and the IQ of children. A meta-analysis of modern studies. Jama 263: 673-678.
Needleman HL, Riess JA, Tobin MJ, Biesecker GE, Greenhouse JB. (1996). Bone Lead Levels and Delinquent Behavior. Jama 275: 363-369.
Olczak, M., et al. (2011). "Persistent behavioral impairments and alterations of brain dopamine system after early postnatal administration of thimerosal in rats." Behav Brain Res 223(1): 107-118.
Onishchenko, N., et al. (2007). "Developmental exposure to methylmercury alters learning and induces depression-like behavior in male mice." Toxicol Sci 97(2): 428-437.
Orenstein, S. T., et al. (2014). "Prenatal organochlorine and methylmercury exposure and memory and learning in school-age children in communities near the New Bedford Harbor Superfund site, Massachusetts." Environ Health Perspect 122(11): 1253-1259.
Rice, D. C. (1992). "Effects of pre- plus postnatal exposure to methylmercury in the monkey on fixed interval and discrimination reversal performance." Neurotoxicology 13(2): 443-452.
Saar D, Barkai E. (2003). Long-term modifications in intrinsic neuronal properties and rule learning in rats. Eur J Neurosci. 17: 2727-2734.
Sahin, D., et al. (2016). "Effects of gestational and lactational exposure to low dose mercury chloride (HgCl2) on behaviour, learning and hearing thresholds in WAG/Rij rats." EXCLI J 15: 391-402.
Salinas JA, Huff NC. (2002). Lead and conditioned fear to contextual and discrete cues. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 24: 541-550.
Sokolowski, K., et al. (2013). "Neural stem cell apoptosis after low-methylmercury exposures in postnatal hippocampus produce persistent cell loss and adolescent memory deficits." Dev Neurobiol 73(12): 936-949.
Surkan PJ, Zhang A, Trachtenberg F, Daniel DB, McKinlay S, Bellinger DC. (2007). Neuropsychological function in children with blood lead levels <10 microg/dL. Neurotoxicology. 28: 1170-1177.
Sui L, Anderson WL, Gilbert ME. (2005). Impairment in short-term but enhanced long-term synaptic potentiation and ERK activation in adult hippocampal area CA1 following developmental thyroid hormone insufficiency. Toxicol Sci 85:647-656.
Sui L, Gilbert ME. (2003). Pre- and postnatal propylthiouracil-induced hypothyroidism impairs synaptic transmission and plasticity in area CA1 of the neonatal rat hippocampus. Endocrinology 144:4195-4203.
Taylor MA, Swant J, Wagner JJ, Fisher JW, Ferguson DC. (2008). Lower thyroid compensatory reserve of rat pups after maternal hypothyroidism: correlation of thyroid, hepatic, and cerebrocortical biomarkers with hippocampal neurophysiology. Endocrinology 149:3521-3530.
Toscano CD, Guilarte TR. (2005). Lead neurotoxicity: From exposure to molecular effects. Brain Res Rev. 49: 529-554.
Vara H, Martinez B, Santos A, Colino A. (2002). Thyroid hormone regulates neurotransmitter release in neonatal rat hippocampus. Neuroscience 110:19-28.
Wang S, Teng W, Gao Y, Fan C, Zhang H, Shan Z. (2012). Early levothyroxine treatment on maternal subclinical hypothyroidism improves spatial learning of offspring in rats. J Neuroendocrinol 24:841–848.
Wheeler SM, McAndrews MP, Sheard ED, Rovet J. (2012). Visuospatial associative memory and hippocampal functioning in congenital hypothyroidism. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 18:49-56.
Wheeler SM, McLelland VC, Sheard E, McAndrews MP, Rovet JF. (2015). Hippocampal Functioning and Verbal Associative Memory in Adolescents with Congenital Hypothyroidism. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 6:163.
Willoughby KA, McAndrews MP, Rovet J. (2013). Effects of early thyroid hormone deficiency on children's autobiographical memory performance. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 19:419-429.
Willoughby KA, McAndrews MP, Rovet JF. (2014). Effects of maternal hypothyroidism on offspring hippocampus and memory. Thyroid 24:576-584.
Wu Y, Beland FA1, Fang JL. (2016). Effect of triclosan, triclocarban, 2,2',4,4'-tetrabromodiphenyl ether, and bisphenol A on the iodide uptake, thyroid peroxidase activity, and expression of genes involved in thyroid hormone synthesis. Toxicol In Vitro. Apr;32:310-9.
Xiao Y, Fu H, Han X, Hu X, Gu H, Chen Y, Wei Q, Hu Q. (2014). Role of synaptic structural plasticity in impairments of spatial learning and memory induced by developmental lead exposure in Wistar rats. PLoS One. 23;9(12):e115556.
Xu J, Yan HC, Yang B, Tong LS, Zou YX, Tian Y. (2009). Effects of lead exposure on hippocampal metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 3 and 7 in developmental rats. J Negat Results Biomed. 8: 5.
Yorifuji, T., et al. (2011). "Long-term exposure to methylmercury and psychiatric symptoms in residents of Minamata, Japan." Environ Int 37(5): 907-913.
Zanoli, P., et al. (1994). "Methyl mercury during late gestation affects temporarily the development of cortical muscarinic receptors in rat offspring." Pharmacol Toxicol 75(5): 261-264.
Zanoli, P., et al. (2001). "Prenatal exposure to methyl mercury in rats: focus on changes in kynurenine pathway." Brain Res Bull 55(2): 235-238.
List of Non Adjacent Key Event Relationships
Relationship: 1690: Oxidative Stress leads to N/A, Cell injury/death
AOPs Referencing Relationship
| AOP Name | Adjacency | Weight of Evidence | Quantitative Understanding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binding of electrophilic chemicals to SH(thiol)-group of proteins and /or to seleno-proteins during brain development leads to impairment of learning and memory | non-adjacent | High |
Evidence Supporting Applicability of this Relationship
| Life Stage | Evidence |
|---|---|
| During brain development, adulthood and aging | High |
| Sex | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Unspecific | High |
Rat, Mouse: (Sarafian et al., 1994; Castoldi et al., 2000; Kaur, Aschner and Syversen, 2006; Franco et al., 2007; Lu et al., 2011; Polunas et al., 2011)
(Richetti et al., 2011) - Adult and healthy zebrafish of both sexes (12 animals and housed in 3 L) mercury chloride final concentration of 20 mg/L. Mercury chloride promoted a significant decrease in acetylcholinesterase activity and the antioxidant competence was also decreased.
(Berntssen, Aatland and Handy, 2003) - Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) were supplemented with mercuric chloride (0, 10, or 100 mg Hg per kg) or methylmercury chloride (0, 5, or 10 mg Hg per kg) for 4 months.
Methylmercury chloride
- accumulated significantly in the brain of fish fed 5 or 10 mg/kg
- No mortality or growth reduction
- - 2-fold increase in the antioxidant enzyme super oxide dismutase (SOD) in the brain
- 10 mg/kg - 7-fold increase of lipid peroxidative products (thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, TBARS) and a subsequently 1.5-fold decrease in anti oxidant enzyme activity (SOD and glutathione peroxidase, GSH-Px). Fish also had pathological damage (vacoulation and necrosis), significantly reduced neural enzyme activity (5-fold reduced monoamine oxidase, MAO, activity), and reduced overall post-feeding activity behaviour.
Mercuric chloride
- accumulated significantly in the brain only at 100 mg/kg
- No mortality or growth reduction
- 100 mg/kg - significant reduced neural MAO activity and pathological changes (astrocyte proliferation) in the brain, however, neural SOD and GSH-Px enzyme activity, lipid peroxidative products (TBARS), and post feeding behaviour did not differ from controls.
Key Event Relationship Description
Oxidative stress (OS) as a concept in redox biology and medicine has been formulated in 1985 (Sies, 2015). OS is intimately linked to cellular energy balance and comes from the imbalance between the generation and detoxification of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS/RNS) or from a decay of the antioxidant protective ability. OS is characterized by the reduced capacity of endogenous systems to fight against the oxidative attack directed towards target biomolecules (Wang and Michaelis, 2010; Pisoschi and Pop, 2015). Glutathione, the most important redox buffer in cells (antioxidant), cycles between reduced glutathione (GSH) and oxidized glutathione disulfide (GSSG), and serves as a vital sink for control of ROS levels in cells (Reynolds et al., 2007). Several case-control studies have reported the link between lower concentrations of GSH, higher levels of GSSG and the development of diseases (Rossignol and Frye, 2014). OS can cause cellular damage and subsequent cell death because the ROS oxidize vital cellular components such as lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids (Gilgun-Sherki, Melamed and Offen, 2001; Wang and Michaelis, 2010).
The central nervous system is especially vulnerable to free radical damage since it has a high oxygen consumption rate, an abundant lipid content and reduced levels of antioxidant enzymes (Coyle and Puttfarcken, 1993; Markesbery, 1997). It has been show that the developing brain is particularly vulnerable to neurotoxicants and OS due to differentiation processes, changes in morphology, lack of physiological barriers and less intrinsic capacity to cope with cellular stress (Grandjean and Landrigan, 2014; Sandström et al., 2017). OS has been link to brain aging, neurodegenerative diseases, and other related adverse conditions. There is evidence that free radicals play a role in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion, head injury, Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Down’s syndrome, and Alzheimer’s disease due to cellular damage (Markesbery, 1997; Gilgun-Sherki, Melamed and Offen, 2001; Wang and Michaelis, 2010). OS has also been linked to neurodevelopmental diseases and deficits like autism spectrum disorder and postnatal motor coordination deficits (Wells et al., 2009; Rossignol and Frye, 2014; Bhandari and Kuhad, 2015)
Evidence Supporting this KER
Biological PlausibilityA noteworthy insight, early on, was the perception that oxidation-reduction (redox) reactions in living cells are utilized in fundamental processes of redox regulation, collectively termed ‘redox signaling’ and ‘redox control’ (Sies, 2015).
Free radical-induced damage in OS has been confirmed as a contributor to the pathogenesis and patho-physiology of many chronic diseases, such as Alzheimer, atherosclerosis, Parkinson, but also in traumatic brain injury, sepsis, stroke, myocardial infraction, inflammatory diseases, cataracts and cancer (Bar-Or et al., 2015; Pisoschi and Pop, 2015). It has been assessed that oxidative stress is correlated with over 100 diseases, either as source or outcome (Pisoschi and Pop, 2015).
Therefore, the fact that ROS over-production can kill neurons is well accepted (Brown and Bal-Price, 2003; Taetzsch and Block, 2013). This ROS over-production can occur in the neurons themselves or can also have a glial origin (Yuste et al., 2015).
Empirical EvidenceMercury
Oxidative stress has been implicated in the pathogenesis of methylmercury (MeHg) neurotoxicity. Studies of mature neurons suggest that the mitochondrion may be a major source of MeHg-induced reactive oxygen species and a critical mediator of MeHg-induced neuronal death, likely by activation of apoptotic pathways. (Polunas et al., 2011)
(Yoshida et al., 2011) – WT and metallothionein (MT)-I/II null mice exposed to low-levels of mercury vapor (Hg0) during postnatal development. Repeatedly exposed to Hg0 at 0.030 mg/m3 (range: 0.023-0.043 mg/m3 ), for 6 hr per day until the 20th day postpartum.
- 12 weeks of age - Hg0 -exposed MT-I/II null mice showed a significant decrease in total locomotor activity in females, though learning ability and spatial learning ability were not affected.
- Metallothionein I/II are more susceptible to mercury exposure
(Lu et al., 2011) - MeHg in the mouse cerebrum (in vivo) and in cultured Neuro-2a cells (in vitro).
- In vivo - 50µg/kg/day MeHg for 7 consecutive weeks - increased levels of lipid peroxidation in the plasma and cerebral cortex. Decreased GSH level and increase the expressions of caspase-3, -7, and -9, accompanied by Bcl-2 down-regulation and up-regulation of Bax, Bak, and p53.
- In vitro – 3 and 5 µM MeHg - reduced cell viability, increased oxidative stress damage, and induced several features of mitochondria-dependent apoptotic signals, including increased sub-G1 hypodiploids, mitochondrial dysfunctions, and the activation of PARP, and caspase cascades.
- These MeHg-induced apoptotic-related signals could be remarkably reversed by antioxidant NAC.
(Sarafian et al., 1994) - Hypothalamic mouse neural cell line GT1-7 without and with expression construct for the anti-apoptotic proto-oncogene, bcl-2.
- 3h exposure, 10 µM MeHg - increased formation of reactive ROS, and decreased levels of GSH, associated with 20% cell death. Cells transfected with an expression construct bcl-2, displayed attenuated ROS induction and negligible cell death.
- 24h exposure, 5 µM MeHg - killed 56% of control cells, but only 19% of bcl-2-transfected cells.
- By using diethyl maleate to deplete cells of GSH, we demonstrate that the differential sensitivity to MeHg was not due solely to intrinsically different GSH levels. The data suggest that MeHg-mediated cell killing correlates more closely with ROS generation than with GSH levels and that bcl-2 protects MeHg-treated cells by suppressing ROS generation.
(Castoldi et al., 2000) - In vitro exposure of primary cultures of rat CGCs to MeHg resulted in a time- and concentration-dependent cell death.
- 1 hr exposure, 5–10 µM MeHg - impairment of mitochondrial activity, de-energization of mitochondria and plasma membrane lysis, resulting in necrotic cell death.
- 1hr exposure, 0.5–1 µM MeHg - did not compromise cell viability, mitochondrial membrane potential and function at early time points.
- 1hr exposure, 1 µM MeHg - only a small population of neurons (+-20%) dies by necrosis. The surviving neurons show network damage, but maintain membrane integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential and function at early time points. Later, however, the cells progressively display the morphological signs of apoptosis.
- 18hr exposure, 0.5–1 µM MeHg – cells progressively underwent apoptosis reaching the 100% cell death
- insulin-like growth factor-I partially rescued CGCs from MeHg-triggered apoptosis.
(Kaur,et al., 2006) - primary cell cultures of cerebellar neurons and astrocytes from 7-day-old NMRI mice. 5 mM MeHg for 30 min.
- Twenty-one days post-astrocyte isolation - 250mM N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) or 3mM di-ethyl maleate (DEM) added to the wells 12 h prior to MeHg exposure
- 7 days post-neurons isolation - 200mM of NAC or 1.8mM of DEM added to the wells 12 h prior to MeHg exposure
- The intracellular GSH content was modified by pretreatment with NAC or DEM for 12 h.
- Treatment with 5 mM Me Hg for 30 min led to significant (p < 0.05) increase in ROS and reduction (p < 0.001) in GSH content.
- Depletion of intracellular GSH by DEM further increased the generation of MeHg-induced ROS in both cell cultures.
- NAC supplementation increased intracellular GSH and provided protection against MeHg-induced oxidative stress in both cell cultures.
(Franco et al., 2007) – Mitochondrial enriched fractions from adult (2 months old) Swiss Albino male mice.
- MeHg and HgCl2 (10–100 µM) significantly decreased mitochondrial viability; this phenomenon was positively correlated to mercurial-induced glutathione oxidation.
- Both mercurials induced a significant reduction of GSH in a dose-dependent manner.
- Correlation analyses showed significant positive correlations between mitochondrial viability and glutathione content for MeHg (Pearson coefficient) 0.933; P < 0.01) and or HgCl2 (Pearson coefficient ) 0.854; P < 0.01).
- Quercetin (100–300 µM) prevented mercurial-induced disruption of mitochondrial viability. Moreover, quercetin, which did not display any chelating effect on MeHg or HgCl2, prevented mercurial-induced glutathione oxidation.
(Polunas et al., 2011) - Murine embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells, which differentiate into neurons following exposure to retinoic acid.
- 4h exposure, 1.5 mM MeHg - earlier and significantly higher levels of ROS production and more extensive mitochondrial depolarization in neurons than in undifferentiated EC cells. cyclosporin A (CsA) completely inhibited mitochondrial depolarization by MeHg in EC cells but only delayed this response in the neurons. In contrast, CsA significantly inhibited MeHg-induced neuronal ROS production. Cyt c release was also more extensive in neurons, with less protection afforded by CsA.
(Sandström et al., 2016) - in vitro 3D human neural tissues from neural progenitor cells derived from human embryonic stem cells. Single MeHg exposure at day 42 of 3D culturing (week 6) and material was collected 72 h after.
- 1-10 μM - LDH activity increased, confirming induced cell death.
- 5 and 10 μM - increased HMOX1 gene expression as indirect marker of oxidative stress.
Acrylamide
(Allam et al., 2011) - sixty albino Rattus norvegicus, 45 virgin females and 15 mature males. This study examined its effects on the development of external features in cubs.
- prenatal intoxicated group - newborns from mothers treated with ACR from day 7 (GD 7) of gestation till birth
- perinatal intoxicated group - newborns from mothers treated with ACR from GD7 of gestation till D28 after birth
ACR administered either prenatally or perinatally has been shown to induce significant retardation in the new- borns’ body weights development, increase of thiobarbituric acid- reactive substances (TBARS) and oxidative stress (significant reductions in glutathione reduced, total thiols, superoxide dismutase and peroxidase activities) in the developing cerebellum. ACR treatment delayed the proliferation in the granular layer and delayed both cell migration and differentiation. Purkinje cell loss was also seen in acrylamide-treated animals. Ultrastructural studies of Purkinje cells in the perinatal group showed microvacuolations and cell loss.
(Lakshmi et al., 2012) - Wistar male albino rats, four groups (n = 6 per group)
- II – (Acrylamide) ACR - 30 mg/kg ACR for 30 days: increase in the lipid peroxidative (LPO), protein carbonyl, hydroxyl radical and hydroperoxide levels with subsequent decrease in the activities of enzymic antioxidants and level of GSH. Cortex showed condensed nuclei along with damaged cells. Decrease in the expression of Bcl2 along with simultaneous increase in the expressions of Bax and Bad as compared to control.
- II rats – ACR + Fish oil -0.5 ml/kg b.w.fish oil orally 10 min before ACR induction with 30 mg/kg for 30 days – reversed significantly all the OS markers.
Mercury-induced upregulation of GSH level and GR activity as an adaptive mechanism following lactational exposure to methylmercury (10 mg/L in drinking water) associated with motor deficit, suggesting neuronal impairment (Franco et al., 2006).
References
Allam, a et al. (2011) ‘Prenatal and perinatal acrylamide disrupts the development of cerebellum in rat: Biochemical and morphological studies.’, Toxicology and industrial health, 27, pp. 291–306. doi: 10.1177/0748233710386412.
Bar-Or, D. et al. (2015) ‘Oxidative stress in severe acute illness’, Redox Biology. Elsevier, 4, pp. 340–345. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.01.006.
Berntssen, M. H. G., Aatland, A. and Handy, R. D. (2003) ‘Chronic dietary mercury exposure causes oxidative stress, brain lesions, and altered behaviour in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) parr’, Aquatic Toxicology, 65(1), pp. 55–72. doi: 10.1016/S0166-445X(03)00104-8.
Bhandari, R. and Kuhad, A. (2015) ‘Neuropsychopharmacotherapeutic efficacy of curcumin in experimental paradigm of autism spectrum disorders’, Life Sciences. Elsevier Inc., 141, pp. 156–169. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2015.09.012.
Castoldi, A. F. et al. (2000) ‘Early acute necrosis, delayed apoptosis and cytoskeletal breakdown in cultured cerebellar granule neurons exposed to methylmercury’, Journal of Neuroscience Research, 59(6), pp. 775–787. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(20000315)59:6<775::AID-JNR10>3.0.CO;2-T.
Coyle, J. and Puttfarcken, P. (1993) ‘Glutamate Toxicity’, Science, 262, pp. 689–95.
Franco, J. L. et al. (2006) ‘Cerebellar thiol status and motor deficit after lactational exposure to methylmercury’, Environmental Research, 102(1), pp. 22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2006.02.003.
Franco, J. L. et al. (2007) ‘Mercurial-induced hydrogen peroxide generation in mouse brain mitochondria: Protective effects of quercetin’, Chemical Research in Toxicology, 20(12), pp. 1919–1926. doi: 10.1021/tx7002323.
Gilgun-Sherki, Y., Melamed, E. and Offen, D. (2001) ‘Oxidative stress induced-neurodegenerative diseases: The need for antioxidants that penetrate the blood brain barrier’, Neuropharmacology, 40(8), pp. 959–975. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3908(01)00019-3.
Grandjean, P. and Landrigan, P. J. (2014) ‘Neurobehavioural effects of developmental toxicity’, The Lancet Neurology, 13(3), pp. 330–338. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70278-3.
Kaur, P., Aschner, M. and Syversen, T. (2006) ‘Glutathione modulation influences methyl mercury induced neurotoxicity in primary cell cultures of neurons and astrocytes’, NeuroToxicology, 27(4), pp. 492–500. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2006.01.010.
Lakshmi, D. et al. (2012) ‘Ameliorating effect of fish oil on acrylamide induced oxidative stress and neuronal apoptosis in cerebral cortex’, Neurochemical Research, 37(9), pp. 1859–1867. doi: 10.1007/s11064-012-0794-1.
Lu, T. H. et al. (2011) ‘Involvement of oxidative stress-mediated ERK1/2 and p38 activation regulated mitochondria-dependent apoptotic signals in methylmercury-induced neuronal cell injury’, Toxicology Letters. Elsevier Ireland Ltd, 204(1), pp. 71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.04.013.
Markesbery, W. R. (1997) ‘Oxidative stress hypothesis in Alzheimer’s disease’, Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 23(1), pp. 134–147. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(96)00629-6.
Pisoschi, A. M. and Pop, A. (2015) ‘The role of antioxidants in the chemistry of oxidative stress: A review’, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. Elsevier Masson SAS, 97, pp. 55–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.04.040.
Polunas, M. et al. (2011) ‘Role of oxidative stress and the mitochondrial permeability transition in methylmercury cytotoxicity’, NeuroToxicology. Elsevier B.V., 32(5), pp. 526–534. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2011.07.006.
Reynolds, A. et al. (2007) ‘Oxidative Stress and the Pathogenesis of Neurodegenerative Disorders’, International Review of Neurobiology, 82(7), pp. 297–325. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(07)82016-2.
Richetti, S. K. et al. (2011) ‘Acetylcholinesterase activity and antioxidant capacity of zebrafish brain is altered by heavy metal exposure’, NeuroToxicology. Elsevier B.V., 32(1), pp. 116–122. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2010.11.001.
Rossignol, D. A. and Frye, R. E. (2014) ‘Evidence linking oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and inflammation in the brain of individuals with autism’, Frontiers in Physiology, 5 APR(April), pp. 1–15. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00150.
Sandström, J. et al. (2016) ‘Toxicology in Vitro Development and characterization of a human embryonic stem cell-derived 3D neural tissue model for neurotoxicity testing’, Tiv, pp. 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2016.10.001.
Sandström, J. et al. (2017) ‘Potential mechanisms of development-dependent adverse effects of the herbicide paraquat in 3D rat brain cell cultures’, NeuroToxicology, 60, pp. 116–124. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2017.04.010.
Sarafian, T. A. et al. (1994) ‘Bcl-2 Expression Decreases Methyle Mercury-Induced Free-Radical Generation and Cel Killing in a Neural Cell Line’, Toxicol. Lett., 74(2), pp. 149–155.
Sies, H. (2015) ‘Oxidative stress: A concept in redox biology and medicine’, Redox Biology. Elsevier, 4, pp. 180–183. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.01.002.
Wang, X. and Michaelis, E. K. (2010) ‘Selective neuronal vulnerability to oxidative stress in the brain’, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 2(MAR), pp. 1–13. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2010.00012.
Wells, P. G. et al. (2009) ‘Oxidative stress in developmental origins of disease: Teratogenesis, neurodevelopmental deficits, and cancer’, Toxicological Sciences, 108(1), pp. 4–18. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfn263.
Yoshida, M. et al. (2011) ‘Neurobehavioral changes and alteration of gene expression in the brains of metallothionein-I/II null mice exposed to low levels of mercury vapor during postnatal development’, The Journal of Toxicological Sciences, 36(5), pp. 539–547. doi: 10.2131/jts.36.539.
Yuste, J.E., et al., 2015. Implications of glial nitric oxide in neurodegenerative diseases. Front Cell Neurosci. 9, 322.


