AOP-Wiki

AOP ID and Title:

AOP 298: Increases in cellular reactive oxygen species and chronic reactive oxygen species leading to human treatment-resistant gastric cancer
Short Title: Increases in ROS and chronic ROS leading to human treatment-resistant gastric cancer

Graphical Representation

Authors

Shihori Tanabe1), Sabina Quader2), Ryuichi Ono3), Horacio Cabral4), Kazuhiko Aoyagi5), Akihiko Hirose6), Hiroshi Yokozaki7), Hiroki Sasaki8), Ed Perkins9)

1Division of Risk Assessment, Center for Biological Safety and Research, National Institute of Health Sciences, Japan

2Innovation Centre of NanoMedicine (iCONM), Kawasaki Institute of Industrial Promotion, Japan

3Division of Cellular and Molecular Toxicology, Center for Biological Safety and Research, National Institute of Health Sciences, Japan

4Department of Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Japan

5Department of Clinical Genomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Japan

6Chemicals Assessment and Research Center, Chemicals Evaluation and Research Institute, Japan

7Department of Pathology, Kobe University of Graduate School of Medicine, Japan

8Department of Translational Oncology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Japan

9Environmental Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, United States

Status

Author status OECD status OECD project SAAOP status
Open for comment. Do not cite EAGMST Under Review 1.58 Included in OECD Work Plan

Abstract

The injury causes resistance in human gastric cancer. This AOP entitled “Increases in cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and chronic ROS leading to human treatment-resistant gastric cancer” consists of MIE as KE1940 “Increases in cellular ROS” and KE1753 “Chronic ROS”, followed by KE1 as KE1754 “porcupine-induced Wnt secretion and Wnt signaling activation”, KE2 as KE1755 “beta-catenin activation”, KE3 as KE1650 “EMT”, and AO as KE1651 “human treatment-resistant GC”. ROS has multiple roles in disease such as development and progression of cancer, or apoptotic induction causing anti-tumor effects. In this AOP, we focus on the role of sustained levels of chronic ROS to induce the therapy-resistance in human gastric cancer. EMT, which is cellular phenotypic change from epithelial to mesenchymal-like features, demonstrates cancer stem cell-like characteristics in human gastric cancer. EMT is induced by Wnt/beta-catenin signaling, providing the rationale to have Wnt secretion and beta-catenin activation as KE1 and KE2 on the AOP, respectively.

Summary of the AOP

Events

Molecular Initiating Events (MIE), Key Events (KE), Adverse Outcomes (AO)

Sequence Type Event ID Title Short name
2 MIE 1940 Increases in cellular reactive oxygen species Increases in cellular ROS
1 MIE 1753 Chronic reactive oxygen species Chronic ROS
3 KE 1754 Porcupine-induced Wnt secretion and Wnt signaling activation Porcupine-induced Wnt secretion and Wnt signaling activation
4 KE 1755 beta-catenin activation beta-catenin activation
5 KE 1650 Epithelial-mesenchymal transition Epithelial-mesenchymal transition
6 AO 1651 Treatment-resistant gastric cancer Resistant gastric cancer

Key Event Relationships

Upstream Event Relationship Type Downstream Event Evidence Quantitative Understanding
Increases in cellular reactive oxygen species adjacent Porcupine-induced Wnt secretion and Wnt signaling activation Moderate Moderate
Chronic reactive oxygen species adjacent Porcupine-induced Wnt secretion and Wnt signaling activation Moderate Moderate
Porcupine-induced Wnt secretion and Wnt signaling activation adjacent beta-catenin activation Moderate Moderate
beta-catenin activation adjacent Epithelial-mesenchymal transition Moderate Moderate
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition adjacent Treatment-resistant gastric cancer Moderate Moderate

Stressors

Name Evidence
Wnt High
WNT2 High
Porcupine Moderate
Wntless Moderate
Ionizing Radiation Moderate
ferric nitrilotriacetate Not Specified

Wnt

WNT induces EMT (J. Zhang, Tian, & Xing, 2016). 

WNT2

WNT2 induces EMT in cervical cancer (Zhou et al., 2016).

Porcupine

Porcupine palmitoleates Wnt and facilitates the secretion of the Wnt ligand (Yu & Virshup, 2014) .

Wntless

Wntless binds to and transport Wnt to the plasma membrane leading to the secretion of Wnt ligand (Yu & Virshup, 2014).

ferric nitrilotriacetate

Carcinogenic iron(III)-nitrilotriacetate induces reactive oxygen species production via trasfer of an electron to molecular oxygen to form reactive oxygen species [Tsuchiya K, Akai K, Tokumura A, Abe S, Tamaki T, Takiguchi Y, Fukuzawa K. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005 Aug 30;1725(1):111-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2005.05.001, Akai K, Tsuchiya K, Tokumura A, Kogure K, Ueno S, Shibata A, Tamaki T, Fukuzawa K. Free Radic Res. 2004 Sep;38(9):951-62. doi: 10.1080/1071576042000261945.].

 

Overall Assessment of the AOP

1. Support for Biological Plausibility of KERs

MIE1 => KE1:
Increases in cellular ROS leads to porcupine-induced Wnt secretion and Wnt signaling activation

Biological Plausibility of the MIE1 => KE1 is moderate.
Rationale: Increases in cellular ROS caused by/causes DNA damage, which will alter several signaling pathways including Wnt signaling. ROS stimulate inflammatory factor production and Wnt/
b-catenin signaling (Vallée & Lecarpentier, 2018).

MIE2 => KE1:
Chronic ROS leads to porcupine-induced Wnt secretion and Wnt signaling activation

Biological Plausibility of the MIE2 => KE1 is moderate.
Rationale: Sustained ROS increase caused by/causes DNA damage, which will alter several signaling pathways including Wnt signaling. Macrophages accumulate into injured tissue to recover the tissue damage, which may be followed by porcupine-induced Wnt secretion. ROS stimulate inflammatory factor production and Wnt/
b-catenin signaling (Vallée & Lecarpentier, 2018).

KE1 => KE2:
Porcupine-induced Wnt secretion and Wnt signaling activation leads to beta-catenin activation

Biological Plausibility of the KE1 => KE2 is moderate.
Rationale: Secreted Wnt ligand stimulates Wnt/
b-catenin signaling, in which b-catenin is activated. Wnt ligand binds to Frizzled receptor, which leads to GSK3b inactivation. GSK3b inactivation leads to b-catenin dephosphorylation, which avoids the ubiquitination of the b-catenin and stabilize the b-catenin (Clevers & Nusse, 2012).

KE2 => KE3:
beta-catenin activation leads to Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)

Biological Plausibility of the KE2 => KE3 is moderate.
Rationale:
b-catenin activation, of which mechanism include the stabilization of the dephosphorylated b -catenin and translocation of b-catenin into the nucleus, induce the formation of b-catenin-TCF complex and transcription of transcription factors such as Snail, Zeb and Twist (Clevers & Nusse, 2012) (Ahmad et al., 2012; Pearlman et al., 2017; Sohn et al., 2019; Yang W et al., 2019).

EMT-related transcription factors including Snail, ZEB and Twist are up-regulated in cancer cells (Diaz et al., 2014). The transcription factors such as Snail, ZEB and Twist bind to E-cadherin (CDH1) promoter and inhibit the CDH1 transcription via the consensus E-boxes (5’-CACCTG-3’ or 5’-CAGGTG-3’), which leads to EMT (Diaz et al., 2014).

KE3 => AO:
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) leads to treatment-resistant gastric cancer

Biological Plausibility of the KE3 => AO is moderate.
Rationale: Some population of the cells exhibiting EMT demonstrates the feature of cancer stem cells (CSCs), which are related to cancer malignancy (Shibue & Weinberg, 2017; Tanabe, 2015a, 2015b; Tanabe et al., 2015).

EMT phenomenon is related to cancer metastasis and cancer therapy resistance (Smith & Bhowmick, 2016; Tanabe, 2013). Increase expression of enzymes that degrade the extracellular matrix components and the decrease in adhesion to the basement membrane in EMT induce the cell escape from the basement membrane and metastasis (Smith & Bhowmick, 2016). Morphological changes observed during EMT is associated with therapy resistance (Smith & Bhowmick, 2016).  

2. Support for essentiality of KEs

KE1: Porcupine-induced Wnt secretion and Wnt signaling activation

Essentiality of the KE1 is moderate.
Rationale for Essentiality of KEs in the AOP: The Wnt signaling activation is essential for the subsequent
b-catenin activation and cancer resistance.

KE2:

beta-catenin activation

Essentiality of the KE2 is moderate.
Rationale for Essentiality of KEs in the AOP:
b-catenin activation is essential for the Wnt-induced cancer resistance.

KE3: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)

Essentiality of the KE3 is moderate.
Rationale for Essentiality of KEs in the AOP: EMT is essential for the Wnt-induced cancer promotion and acquisition of resistance to anti-cancer drug.

3. Empirical support for KERs

MIE1 => KE1:
Increases in cellular ROS leads to porcupine-induced Wnt secretion and Wnt signaling activation

Empirical Support of the MIE1 => KE1 is moderate.
Rationale: Production of ROS by DNA double-strand break causes the tissue damages
(Gao et al., 2019).

ROS signaling induces Wnt/b-catenin signaling (Pérez et al., 2017).

MIE2 => KE1:
Chronic ROS leads to porcupine-induced Wnt secretion and Wnt signaling activation

Empirical Support of the MIE2 => KE1 is moderate.
Rationale: Production of ROS by DNA double-strand break causes the tissue damages
(Gao et al., 2019).

ROS signaling induces Wnt/b-catenin signaling (Pérez et al., 2017).

KE1 => KE2:
Porcupine-induced Wnt secretion and Wnt signaling activation leads to beta-catenin activation

Empirical Support of the KE1 => KE2 is moderate.
Rationale: Dishevelled (DVL), a positive regulator of Wnt signaling, form the complex with FZD and lead to trigger the Wnt signaling together with Wnt coreceptor low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor-related protein 6 (LRP6) (Clevers & Nusse, 2012; Jiang et al., 2015).

Wnt binds to FZD and activate the Wnt signaling (Clevers & Nusse, 2012; Janda et al., 2012; Nile et al., 2017). Wnt binding towards FZD induce the formation of the protein complex with LRP5/6 and DVL, leading to the down-stream signaling activation including beta-catenin (Clevers & Nusse, 2012).

KE2 => KE3:
beta-catenin activation leads to Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)

Empirical Support of the KE2 => KE3 is moderate.
Rationale: The inhibition of c-MET, which is overexpressed in diffuse-type gastric cancer, induced increase in phosphorylated
b-catenin, decrease in b-catenin and Snail (Sohn et al., 2019).

The garcinol, that has anti-cancer effect, increases phosphorylated beta-catenin, decreases b-catenin and ZEB1/ZEB2, and inhibit EMT (Ahmad et al., 2012).

The inhibition of sortilin by AF38469 (a sortilin inhibitor) or small interference RNA (siRNA) results in decrease in b-catenin and Twist expression in human glioblastoma cells (Yang W. et al., 2019).

Histone deacetylase inhibitors effect on EMT-related transcription factors including ZEB, Twist and Snail (Wawruszak et al., 2019).

Snail and Zeb induces EMT and suppress E-cadherin (CDH1) (Batlle et al., 2000; Diaz et al., 2014; Peinado et al., 2007).

KE3 => AO:
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) leads to Treatment-resistant gastric cancer

Empirical Support of the KE3 => AO is moderate.
Rationale: EMT activation induces the expression of multiple members of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter family, which results in doxorubicin resistance (Saxena et al., 2011; Shibue & Weinberg, 2017).

TGFb-1 induced EMT results in the acquisition of cancer stem cell (CSC) like properties (Pirozzi et al., 2011; Shibue & Weinberg, 2017).

Snail-induced EMT induces the cancer metastasis and resistance to dendritic cell-mediated immunotherapy (Kudo-Saito et al., 2009).

Zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox (ZEB1)-induced EMT results in relief of miR-200-mediated repression of programmed cell death 1 ligand (PD-L1) expression, a major inhibitory ligand for the programmed cell death protein (PD-1) immune-checkpoint protein on CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL), subsequently the CD8+ T cell immunosuppression and metastasis (Chen et al., 2014).

Domain of Applicability

Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
All life stages High
Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
Homo sapiens Homo sapiens High NCBI
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Unspecific High

Homo sapiens

Essentiality of the Key Events

Sustained ROS contributes into the initiation and development of human gastric cancer (Gu H. 2018).

Wnt signaling is involved in cancer malignancy (Tanabe, 2018).

Upon stimulation with Wnt ligand to Frizzled receptor, Wnt/beta-catenin signaling is activated. Wnt/beta-catenin consists of GSK3 beta inactivation, beta-catenin activation and up-regulation of transcription factors such as Zeb, Twist and Snail. The transcription factors Zeb, Twist and Snail relate to the activation of EMT-related genes. EMT is regulated with various gene networks (Tanabe, 2015c).

Weight of Evidence Summary

The Wnt signaling promotes EMT and cancer malignancy in colorectal cancer (Lazarova & Bordonaro, 2017). Although the potential pathways other than Wnt signaling exist in EMT induction and the mechanism underlaid cancer malignancy, Wnt signaling is one of the main pathways to induce EMT and cancer malignancy (Polakis, 2012).

Quantitative Consideration

Wnt signaling activates the CSCs to promote cancer malignancy (Reya & Clevers, 2005). The responses in KEs related to Wnt signaling, Frizzled activation, GSK3beta inactivation, beta-catenin activation, Snail, Zeb, Twist activation are dose-dependently related. The quantification of EMT and cancer malignancy would require the further investigation.

Considerations for Potential Applications of the AOP (optional)

AOP entitled “Chronic reactive oxygen species leading to human treatment-resistant gastric cancer” might be utilized for the development and risk assessment of anti-cancer drugs. EMT is involved in the acquisition of drug resistance, which is one of the critical features of cancer malignancy. The assessment on activity of EMT network would serve as prediction of the adverse effects of, or responsiveness to anti-cancer drugs (Tanabe et al., 2023).

References

Ahmad, A., Sarkar, S. H., Bitar, B., Ali, S., Aboukameel, A., Sethi, S., . . . Sarkar, F. H. (2012). Garcinol regulates EMT and Wnt signaling pathways in vitro and in vivo, leading to anticancer activity against breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther, 11(10), 2193-2201. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0232-T

Batlle, E., Sancho, E., Francí, C., Domínguez, D., Monfar, M., Baulida, J., & García de Herreros, A. (2000). The transcription factor Snail is a repressor of E-cadherin gene expression in epithelial tumour cells. Nature Cell Biology, 2(2), 84-89. doi:10.1038/35000034

Chen, L., Gibbons, D. L., Goswami, S., Cortez, M. A., Ahn, Y.-H., Byers, L. A., . . . Qin, F. X.-F. (2014). Metastasis is regulated via microRNA-200/ZEB1 axis control of tumour cell PD-L1 expression and intratumoral immunosuppression. Nature communications, 5, 5241-5241. doi:10.1038/ncomms6241

Clevers, H., & Nusse, R. (2012). Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and disease. Cell, 149(6), 1192-1205. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.012

Diaz, V. M., Vinas-Castells, R., & Garcia de Herreros, A. (2014). Regulation of the protein stability of EMT transcription factors. Cell Adh Migr, 8(4), 418-428. doi:10.4161/19336918.2014.969998

Gao, Q., Zhou, G., Lin, S.-J., Paus, R., & Yue, Z. (2019). How chemotherapy and radiotherapy damage the tissue: Comparative biology lessons from feather and hair models. Experimental dermatology, 28(4), 413-418. doi:10.1111/exd.13846

Janda, C. Y., Waghray, D., Levin, A. M., Thomas, C., & Garcia, K. C. (2012). Structural basis of Wnt recognition by Frizzled. Science, 337(6090), 59-64. doi:10.1126/science.1222879

Kudo-Saito, C., Shirako, H., Takeuchi, T., & Kawakami, Y. (2009). Cancer Metastasis Is Accelerated through Immunosuppression during Snail-Induced EMT of Cancer Cells. Cancer Cell, 15(3), 195-206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2009.01.023

Lazarova, D., & Bordonaro, M. (2017). ZEB1 Mediates Drug Resistance and EMT in p300-Deficient CRC. Journal of Cancer, 8(8), 1453-1459. doi:10.7150/jca.18762

Nile, A. H., Mukund, S., Stanger, K., Wang, W., & Hannoush, R. N. (2017). Unsaturated fatty acyl recognition by Frizzled receptors mediates dimerization upon Wnt ligand binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 114(16), 4147-4152. doi:10.1073/pnas.1618293114

Pearlman, R. L., Montes de Oca, M. K., Pal, H. C., & Afaq, F. (2017). Potential therapeutic targets of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in melanoma. Cancer Lett, 391, 125-140. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2017.01.029

Peinado, H., Olmeda, D., & Cano, A. (2007). Snail, Zeb and bHLH factors in tumour progression: an alliance against the epithelial phenotype? Nat Rev Cancer, 7(6), 415-428. doi:10.1038/nrc2131

Pérez, S., Taléns-Visconti, R., Rius-Pérez, S., Finamor, I., & Sastre, J. (2017). Redox signaling in the gastrointestinal tract. Free radical biology & medicine, 104, 75-103. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.12.048

Pirozzi, G., Tirino, V., Camerlingo, R., Franco, R., La Rocca, A., Liguori, E., . . . Rocco, G. (2011). Epithelial to mesenchymal transition by TGFβ-1 induction increases stemness characteristics in primary non small cell lung cancer cell line. PLoS One, 6(6), e21548-e21548. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021548

Polakis, P. (2012). Wnt signaling in cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 4(5). doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a008052

Reya, T., & Clevers, H. (2005). Wnt signalling in stem cells and cancer. Nature, 434(7035), 843-850. doi:10.1038/nature03319

Saxena, M., Stephens, M. A., Pathak, H., & Rangarajan, A. (2011). Transcription factors that mediate epithelial-mesenchymal transition lead to multidrug resistance by upregulating ABC transporters. Cell death & disease, 2(7), e179-e179. doi:10.1038/cddis.2011.61

Shibue, T., & Weinberg, R. A. (2017). EMT, CSCs, and drug resistance: the mechanistic link and clinical implications. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 14(10), 611-629. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.44

Sohn, S. H., Kim, B., Sul, H. J., Kim, Y. J., Kim, H. S., Kim, H., . . . Zang, D. Y. (2019). INC280 inhibits Wnt/beta-catenin and EMT signaling pathways and its induce apoptosis in diffuse gastric cancer positive for c-MET amplification. BMC Res Notes, 12(1), 125. doi:10.1186/s13104-019-4163-x

Tanabe, S. (2013). Perspectives of gene combinations in phenotype presentation. World journal of stem cells, 5(3), 61-67. doi:10.4252/wjsc.v5.i3.61

Tanabe, S. (2015a). Origin of cells and network information. World journal of stem cells, 7(3), 535-540. doi:10.4252/wjsc.v7.i3.535

Tanabe, S. (2015b). Signaling involved in stem cell reprogramming and differentiation. World journal of stem cells, 7(7), 992-998. doi:10.4252/wjsc.v7.i7.992

Tanabe, S. (2015c). Overview of gene regulation in stem cell network to identify therapeutic targets utilizing genome databases. Insights Stem Cells, 1(1). 

Tanabe, S., Aoyagi, K., Yokozaki, H., & Sasaki, H. (2015). Regulated genes in mesenchymal stem cells and gastric cancer. World journal of stem cells, 7(1), 208-222. doi:10.4252/wjsc.v7.i1.208

Tanabe S, Quader S, Ono R, Cabral H, Aoyagi K, Hirose A, Perkins EJ, Yokozaki H, Sasaki H. (2023). Regulation of Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition Pathway and Artificial Intelligence-Based Modeling for Pathway Activity Prediction. Onco, 3(1):13-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/onco3010002

Vallée, A., & Lecarpentier, Y. (2018). Crosstalk Between Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma and the Canonical WNT/β-Catenin Pathway in Chronic Inflammation and Oxidative Stress During Carcinogenesis. Frontiers in immunology, 9, 745-745. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.00745

Wawruszak, A., Kalafut, J., Okon, E., Czapinski, J., Halasa, M., Przybyszewska, A., . . . Stepulak, A. (2019). Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors and Phenotypical Transformation of Cancer Cells. Cancers (Basel), 11(2). doi:10.3390/cancers11020148

Yang, W., Wu, P. F., Ma, J. X., Liao, M. J., Wang, X. H., Xu, L. S., . . . Yi, L. (2019). Sortilin promotes glioblastoma invasion and mesenchymal transition through GSK-3beta/beta-catenin/twist pathway. Cell Death Dis, 10(3), 208. doi:10.1038/s41419-019-1449-9

Appendix 1

List of MIEs in this AOP

Event: 1940: Increases in cellular reactive oxygen species

Short Name: Increases in cellular ROS

Key Event Component

Process Object Action
reactive oxygen species biosynthetic process reactive oxygen species increased

AOPs Including This Key Event

Stressors

Name
Ionizing Radiation
ferric nitrilotriacetate
Arsenic
Heavy metals (cadmium, lead, copper, iron, nickel)
Mitochondrial ETC inhibitors
Potassium bromate

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Molecular

Cell term

Cell term
cell

Organ term

Organ term
organ

Domain of Applicability

Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
human Homo sapiens Moderate NCBI
human and other cells in culture human and other cells in culture Moderate NCBI
mouse Mus musculus Moderate NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
All life stages Moderate
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Unspecific High

This KE is broadly applicable across species.

Key Event Description

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) refers to chemical species superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, and their secondary reactive products. In the biological context, ROS are signaling molecules with important roles in cell energy metabolism, cell proliferation and fate. Therefore, balancing ROS levels at the cellular and tissue level is an important part of many biological processes. Disbalance, mainly increase of ROS levels, can cause cell dysfunction and irreversible cell damage.

ROS are produced from both exogenous stressors and normal endogenous cellular processes, such as the mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC). Inhibition of the ETC can result in the accumulation of ROS. Exposure to chemicals, heavy metal ions, or ionizing radiation can also result in increased production of ROS. Chemicals and heavy metal ions can deplete cellular antioxidants reducing the cell’s ability to control cellular ROS and resulting in the accumulation of ROS. Cellular antioxidants include glutathione (GSH), protein sulfhydryl groups, superoxide dismutase (SOD).

ROS are radicals, ions, or molecules that have a single unpaired electron in their outermost shell of electrons, which can be categorized into two groups: free oxygen radicals and non-radical ROS [Liou et al., 2010].

<Free oxygen radicals>

superoxide

O2·-

hydroxyl radical

·OH

nitric oxide

NO·

organic radicals

peroxyl radicals

ROO·

alkoxyl radicals

RO·

thiyl radicals

RS·

sulfonyl radicals

ROS·

thiyl peroxyl radicals

RSOO·

disulfides

RSSR

 

<Non-radical ROS>

hydrogen peroxide

H2O2

singlet oxygen

1O2

ozone/trioxygen

O3

organic hydroperoxides

ROOH

hypochlorite

ClO-

peroxynitrite

ONOO-

nitrosoperoxycarbonate anion

O=NOOCO2-

nitrocarbonate anion

O2NOCO2-

dinitrogen dioxide

N2O2

nitronium

NO2+

highly reactive lipid- or carbohydrate-derived carbonyl compounds

Potential sources of ROS include NADPH oxidase, xanthine oxidase, mitochondria, nitric oxide synthase, cytochrome P450, lipoxygenase/cyclooxygenase, and monoamine oxidase [Granger, et al., 2015]. ROS are generated through NADPH oxidases consisting of p47phox and p67phox. ROS are generated through xanthine oxidase activation in sepsis [Ramos, et al., 2018]. Arsenic produces ROS [Zhang et al., 2011]. Mitochondria-targeted paraquat and metformin mediate ROS production [Chowdhury, et al., 2020]. ROS are generated by bleomycin [Lu, et al., 2010]. Radiation induces dose-dependent ROS production [Ji, et al., 2019].

ROS are generated in the course of cellular respiration, metabolism, cell signaling, and inflammation [Dickinson and Chang 2011; Egea, et al. 2017]. Hydrogen peroxide is also made by the endoplasmic reticulum in the course of protein folding. Nitric oxide (NO) is produced at the highest levels by nitric oxide synthase in endothelial cells and phagocytes. NO production is one of the main mechanisms by which phagocytes kill bacteria [Wang et al., 2017]. The other species are produced by reactions with superoxide or peroxide, or by other free radicals or enzymes.

ROS activity is principally local. Most ROS have short half-lives, ranging from nano- to milliseconds, so diffusion is limited, while reactive nitrogen species (RNS) nitric oxide or peroxynitrite can survive long enough to diffuse across membranes [Calcerrada, et al. 2011]. Consequently, local concentrations of ROS are much higher than average cellular concentrations, and signaling is typically controlled by colocalization with redox buffers [Dickinson and Chang 2011; Egea, et al. 2017].

Although their existence is limited temporally and spatially, ROS interact with other ROS or with other nearby molecules to produce more ROS and participate in a feedback loop to amplify the ROS signal, which can increase RNS. Both ROS and RNS also move into neighboring cells and ROS can increase intracellular ROS signaling in neighboring cells [Egea, et al. 2017].

How it is Measured or Detected

<Direct detection>

Many fluorescent compounds can be used to detect ROS, some of which are specific and others are less specific.

ROS can be detected by fluorescent probes such as p-methoxy-phenol derivative [Ashoka et al., 2020].

Chemiluminescence analysis can detect the superoxide, where some probes have a wider range for detecting hydroxyl radical, hydrogen peroxide, and peroxynitrite [Fuloria et al., 2021].

ROS in the blood can be detected using superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPION)-based biosensor [Lee et al., 2020].

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) can be detected with a colorimetric probe, which reacts with H2O2 in a 1:1 stoichiometry to produce a bright pink colored product, followed by the detection with a standard colorimetric microplate reader with a filter in the 540-570 nm range.

The levels of ROS can be quantified using multiple-step amperometry using a stainless steel counter electrode and non-leak Ag|AgCl reference node [Flaherty et al., 2017].

Singlet oxygen can be measured by monitoring the bleaching of p-nitrosodimethylaniline at 440 nm using a spectrophotometer with imidazole as a selective acceptor of singlet oxygen [Onoue et al., 2014].

 

<Indirect Detection>

Alternative methods involve the detection of redox-dependent changes to cellular constituents such as proteins, DNA, lipids, or glutathione [Dickinson and Chang 2011; Wang, et al. 2013; Griendling, et al. 2016]. However, these methods cannot generally distinguish between the oxidative species behind the changes, and cannot provide good resolution for kinetics of oxidative activity.

 

References

Akai, K., et al. (2004). "Ability of ferric nitrilotriacetate complex with three pH-dependent conformations to induce lipid peroxidation." Free Radic Res. Sep;38(9):951-62. doi: 10.1080/1071576042000261945

Ashoka, A. H., et al. (2020). "Recent Advances in Fluorescent Probes for Detection of HOCl and HNO." ACS omega, 5(4), 1730-1742. doi:10.1021/acsomega.9b03420

Calcerrada, P., et al. (2011). "Nitric oxide-derived oxidants with a focus on peroxynitrite: molecular targets, cellular responses and therapeutic implications." Curr Pharm Des 17(35): 3905-3932.

Chowdhury, A. R., et al. (2020). "Mitochondria-targeted paraquat and metformin mediate ROS production to induce multiple pathways of retrograde signaling: A dose-dependent phenomenon." Redox Biol. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101606. PMID: 32604037; PMCID: PMC7327929.

Dickinson, B. C. and Chang C. J. (2011). "Chemistry and biology of reactive oxygen species in signaling or stress responses." Nature chemical biology 7(8): 504-511.

Egea, J., et al. (2017). "European contribution to the study of ROS: A summary of the findings and prospects for the future from the COST action BM1203 (EU-ROS)." Redox biology 13: 94-162.

Flaherty, R. L., et al. (2017). "Glucocorticoids induce production of reactive oxygen species/reactive nitrogen species and DNA damage through an iNOS mediated pathway in breast cancer." Breast Cancer Research, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-017-0823-8

Fuloria, S., et al. (2021). "Comprehensive Review of Methodology to Detect Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in Mammalian Species and Establish Its Relationship with Antioxidants and Cancer." Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) 10(1) 128. doi:10.3390/antiox10010128

Granger, D. N. and Kvietys, P. R. (2015). "Reperfusion injury and reactive oxygen species: The evolution of a concept" Redox Biol. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.08.020. PMID: 26484802; PMCID: PMC4625011.

Go, Y. M. and Jones, D. P. (2013). "The redox proteome." J Biol Chem 288(37): 26512-26520.

Griendling, K. K., et al. (2016). "Measurement of Reactive Oxygen Species, Reactive Nitrogen Species, and Redox-Dependent Signaling in the Cardiovascular System: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association." Circulation research 119(5): e39-75.

Itziou, A., et al. (2011). "In vivo and in vitro effects of metals in reactive oxygen species production, protein carbonylation, and DNA damage in land snails Eobania vermiculata." Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 60(4), 697–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-010-9583-5

Ji, W. O., et al. "Quantitation of the ROS production in plasma and radiation treatments of biotargets." Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 27;9(1):19837. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56160-0. PMID: 31882663; PMCID: PMC6934759.

Kruk, J. and Aboul-Enein, H. Y. (2017). "Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species in Carcinogenesis: Implications of Oxidative Stress on the Progression and Development of Several Cancer Types." Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, 17:11. doi:10.2174/1389557517666170228115324

Lee, D. Y., et al. (2020). "PEGylated Bilirubin-coated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as a Biosensor for Magnetic Relaxation Switching-based ROS Detection in Whole Blood." Theranostics, 10(5), 1997-2007. doi:10.7150/thno.39662

Li, Z., et al. (2020). "Inhibition of MiR-25 attenuates doxorubicin-induced apoptosis, reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage by targeting pten." International Journal of Medical Sciences, 17(10), 1415–1427. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.41980

Liou, G. Y. and Storz, P. "Reactive oxygen species in cancer." Free Radic Res. 2010 May;44(5):479-96. doi:10.3109/10715761003667554. PMID: 20370557; PMCID: PMC3880197.

Lu, Y., et al. (2010). "Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/akt regulates bleomycin-induced fibroblast proliferation and collagen production." American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology, 42(4), 432–441. https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2009-0002OC

Onoue, S., et al. (2013). "Establishment and intra-/inter-laboratory validation of a standard protocol of reactive oxygen species assay for chemical photosafety evaluation." J Appl Toxicol. 33(11):1241-50. doi: 10.1002/jat.2776. Epub 2012 Jun 13. PMID: 22696462.

Ramos, M. F. P., et al. (2018). "Xanthine oxidase inhibitors and sepsis." Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 32:2058738418772210. doi:10.1177/2058738418772210

Ravanat, J. L., et al. (2014). "Radiation-mediated formation of complex damage to DNA: a chemical aspect overview." Br J Radiol 87(1035): 20130715.

Schutzendubel, A. and Polle, A. (2002). "Plant responses to abiotic stresses: heavy metal-induced oxidative stress and protection by mycorrhization." Journal of Experimental Botany, 53(372), 1351–1365. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/53.372.1351

Silva, R., et al. (2019). "Light exposure during growth increases riboflavin production, reactive oxygen species accumulation and DNA damage in Ashbya gossypii riboflavin-overproducing strains." FEMS Yeast Research, 19(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/foy114

Tsuchiya K, et al. (2005). "Oxygen radicals photo-induced by ferric nitrilotriacetate complex." Biochim Biophys Acta. 1725(1):111-9. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2005.05.001

Wang, J., et al. (2017). "Glucocorticoids Suppress Antimicrobial Autophagy and Nitric Oxide Production and Facilitate Mycobacterial Survival in Macrophages." Scientific reports, 7(1), 982. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01174-9

Wang, X., et al. (2013). "Imaging ROS signaling in cells and animals." Journal of molecular medicine 91(8): 917-927.

Zhang, Z., et al. (2011). "Reactive oxygen species mediate arsenic induced cell transformation and tumorigenesis through Wnt/β-catenin pathway in human colorectal adenocarcinoma DLD1 cells. " Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 256(2), 114-121. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2011.07.016

Event: 1753: Chronic reactive oxygen species

Short Name: Chronic ROS

Key Event Component

Process Object Action
response to reactive oxygen species reactive oxygen species increased

AOPs Including This Key Event

Stressors

Name
Ionizing Radiation
ferric nitrilotriacetate
Arsenic

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Molecular

Cell term

Cell term
cell

Organ term

Organ term
organ

Evidence for Perturbation by Stressor

Overview for Molecular Initiating Event

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are generated through NADPH oxidases consisting of p47phox and p67phox. Arsenic produces ROS [Zhang et al., 2011].

Ionizing radiation induces ROS [Kruk et al., 2017].

Iron(III)-nitrilotriacetate induces reactive oxygen species production via the transfer of an electron to molecular oxygen to form ROS [Tsuchiya et al., 2005, Akai et al., 2004].

Ionizing Radiation

Ionizing radiation induces reactive oxygen species.

(Ref. Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species in Carcinogenesis: Implications of Oxidative Stress on the Progression and Development of Several Cancer Types

Author(s): Joanna Kruk, Hassan Y. Aboul-Enein*. Journal Name: Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry,

Volume 17 , Issue 11 , 2017, DOI : 10.2174/1389557517666170228115324)

ferric nitrilotriacetate

Iron(III)-nitrilotriacetate induces reactive oxygen species production via trasfer of an electron to molecular oxygen to form reactive oxygen species [Tsuchiya K, Akai K, Tokumura A, Abe S, Tamaki T, Takiguchi Y, Fukuzawa K. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005 Aug 30;1725(1):111-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2005.05.001, Akai K, Tsuchiya K, Tokumura A, Kogure K, Ueno S, Shibata A, Tamaki T, Fukuzawa K. Free Radic Res. 2004 Sep;38(9):951-62. doi: 10.1080/1071576042000261945.]

 

Domain of Applicability

Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
Homo sapiens Homo sapiens Moderate NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
All life stages Moderate
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Unspecific High

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are increased in human gastric cancer (Homo sapiens) [Gu et al., 2018].

Key Event Description

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are radicals, ions, or molecules that have a single unpaired electron in their outermost shell of electrons, which can be categorized into two groups: free oxygen radicals and non-radical ROS [Liou et al., 2010]. Free oxygen radicals include superoxide (O2·-), hydroxyl radical (·OH), nitric oxide (NO·), organic radicals (R·), peroxyl radicals (ROO·), alkoxyl radicals (RO·), thiyl radicals (RS·), sulfonyl radicals (ROS·), thiyl peroxyl radicals (RSOO·), and disulfides (RSSR). Non-radical ROS include hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), singlet oxygen (1O2), ozone/trioxygen (O3), organic hydroperoxides (ROOH), hypochlorite (ClO-), peroxynitrite (ONOO-), nitrosoperoxycarbonate anion (O=NOOCO2-), nitrocarbonate anion (O2NOCO2-), dinitrogen dioxide (N2O2), nitronium (NO2+), and highly reactive lipid- or carbohydrate-derived carbonyl compounds [Liou et al., 2010].

ROS are generated through NADPH oxidases consists of p47phox and p67phox. Arsenic produces ROS [Zhang et al., 2011]. The primary site of action for this event is DNA or proteins etc.

ROS play an important role in tumorigenesis [Zhang et al., 2011].

Chronic low-level increased ROS can alter the tumor microenvironment and promote cancer stem cell renewal, leading to therapeutic resistance [Gu et al., 2018].

The reason why this chronic ROS KE has been created is because it is important to have chronic ROS, but not just instant increased ROS, since ROS have a double-edged effect.  

How it is Measured or Detected

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) can be detected with a colorimetric probe, which reacts with H2O2 in a 1:1 stoichiometry to produce a bright pink colored product, followed by the detection with a standard colorimetric microplate reader with a filter in the 540-570 nm range.

ROS in the blood can be detected using superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPION)-based biosensor [Lee et al., 2020].

ROS can be detected by fluorescent probes such as p-methoxy-phenol derivative [Ashoka et al., 2020].

References

Akai K, Tsuchiya K, Tokumura A, Kogure K, Ueno S, Shibata A, Tamaki T, Fukuzawa K. Free Radic Res. 2004 Sep;38(9):951-62. doi: 10.1080/1071576042000261945

Ashoka, A. H., Ali, F., Tiwari, R., Kumari, R., Pramanik, S. K., & Das, A. (2020). Recent Advances in Fluorescent Probes for Detection of HOCl and HNO. ACS omega, 5(4), 1730-1742. doi:10.1021/acsomega.9b03420

Gu, H., Huang, T., Shen, Y., Liu, Y., Zhou, F., Jin, Y., . . . Wei, Y. (2018). Reactive Oxygen Species-Mediated Tumor Microenvironment Transformation: The Mechanism of Radioresistant Gastric Cancer. Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity, 2018, 5801209-5801209. doi:10.1155/2018/5801209

Kruk J, Aboul-Enein H. Y. (2017). Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species in Carcinogenesis: Implications of Oxidative Stress on the Progression and Development of Several Cancer TypesJournal Name: Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, 17:11. doi:10.2174/1389557517666170228115324)

Lee, D. Y., Kang, S., Lee, Y., Kim, J. Y., Yoo, D., Jung, W., . . . Jon, S. (2020). PEGylated Bilirubin-coated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as a Biosensor for Magnetic Relaxation Switching-based ROS Detection in Whole Blood. Theranostics, 10(5), 1997-2007. doi:10.7150/thno.39662

Liou GY, Storz P. Reactive oxygen species in cancer. Free Radic Res. 2010 May;44(5):479-96. doi:10.3109/10715761003667554. PMID: 20370557; PMCID: PMC3880197.

Tsuchiya K, Akai K, Tokumura A, Abe S, Tamaki T, Takiguchi Y, Fukuzawa K. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005 Aug 30;1725(1):111-9. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2005.05.001

Zhang, Z., Wang, X., Cheng, S., Sun, L., Son, Y.-O., Yao, H., . . . Shi, X. (2011). Reactive oxygen species mediate arsenic induced cell transformation and tumorigenesis through Wnt/β-catenin pathway in human colorectal adenocarcinoma DLD1 cells. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 256(2), 114-121. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2011.07.016

 

List of Key Events in the AOP

Event: 1754: Porcupine-induced Wnt secretion and Wnt signaling activation

Short Name: Porcupine-induced Wnt secretion and Wnt signaling activation

Key Event Component

Process Object Action
Wnt protein secretion protein-serine O-palmitoleoyltransferase porcupine increased

AOPs Including This Key Event

Stressors

Name
Radiation

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Cellular

Cell term

Cell term
cell

Organ term

Organ term
organ

Evidence for Perturbation by Stressor

Radiation

Radiation induces porcupine-induced Wnt secretion in macrophage (Saha et al., 2016a).

Domain of Applicability

Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
Homo sapiens Homo sapiens High NCBI
Mus musculus Mus musculus High NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
All life stages Moderate
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Unspecific High

Oligomerization of FZD and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5/6 (LRP5/6) activates Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in Homo sapiens (Hua et al., 2018).

Key Event Description

Porcupine, which is a trans-membrane endoplasmic reticulum O-acyl transferase, is important for the secretion of Wnt ligands(Saha et al., 2016a). WNTs are secreted proteins that contain 22-24 conserved cysteine residues (Foulquier et al., 2018). The WNT molecules consist of molecular families including WNT1, WNT2, WNT2B/WNT13, WNT3, WNT4, WNT5A, WNT5B, WNT6, WNT7A, WNT7B, WNT8A, WNT8B, WNT10B, WNT11, and WNT16. (Clevers & Nusse, 2012; M. Katoh, 2001; Kusserow et al., 2005)

Wnt proteins consist of 350-400 amino acids (Saito-Diaz et al., 2013).

WNT ligands are known to trigger at least three different downstream signaling cascades including canonical WNT/beta-catenin signaling pathway, non-canonical WNT/Ca2+ pathway, and planer cell polarity (PCP) pathway(De, 2011; Lai, Chien, & Moon, 2009; Willert & Nusse, 2012). WNTs bind to Frizzled proteins, which are seven-pass transmembrane receptors with an extracellular N-terminal cysteine-rich domain (Bhanot et al., 1996; Clevers, 2006). Wnt signaling begins with the binding of Wnt ligand towards the Frizzled receptors (Mohammed et al., 2016).

Wnt ligands bind to Frizzled (FZD) receptors which are seven transmembrane-domain protein receptors (Nile, Mukund, Stanger, Wang, & Hannoush, 2017). At least 10 FZD receptors are identified in human cells. FZD receptor is activated by Wnt ligand binding (MacDonald, Tamai, & He, 2009). 

How it is Measured or Detected

  • Secretion of WNT requires a number of other dedicated factors including the sortin receptor Wntless (WLS), which binds to Wnt and escorts it to the cell surface (Banziger et al., 2006; Ching & Nusse, 2006)
  • Wnt signaling is activated by the gene mutations of the signaling components (Ziv et al., 2017).
  • Wnt1, Wnt3a, and Wnt5a protein expression are measured by immunoblotting using antibodies for Wnt1, Wnt3a, and Wnt5a, respectively (J. Du et al., 2016; B. Wang et al., 2017).
  • WNT2, of which expression is detected by quantitative PCR, immunoblotting, and immunohistochemistry, induces EMT (Zhou et al., 2016).
  • Frizzled receptor protein level on the cell surface is measured by flow cytometry with pan-FZD antibody (Jiang et al., 2015; Zeng et al., 2018). DVL protein level is measured by immunoblotting with anti-DVL2 antibodies (Zeng et al., 2018).
  • Fzd mRNA level is measured by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (Zeng et al., 2018).
  • The up-regulation of WNT ligand expression occurs in Homo sapiens (B. Wang et al., 2017).
  • The Wnt genes play an important role in the secretion from cells, glycosylation, and tight association with the cell surface and extracellular matrix in Drosophila melanogaster (Willert & Nusse, 2012).

References

Banziger, C., Soldini, D., Schutt, C., Zipperlen, P., Hausmann, G., & Basler, K. (2006). Wntless, a conserved membrane protein dedicated to the secretion of Wnt proteins from signaling cells. Cell, 125(3), 509-522. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.049

Bhanot, P., Brink, M., Samos, C. H., Hsieh, J.-C., Wang, Y., Macke, J. P., . . . Nusse, R. (1996). A new member of the frizzled family from Drosophila functions as a Wingless receptor. Nature, 382, 225. doi:10.1038/382225a0

Ching, W., & Nusse, R. (2006). A dedicated Wnt secretion factor. Cell, 125(3), 432-433. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.018

Clevers, H. (2006). Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in development and disease. Cell, 127(3), 469-480. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.018

Clevers, H., & Nusse, R. (2012). Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and disease. Cell, 149(6), 1192-1205. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.012

De, A. (2011). Wnt/Ca2+ signaling pathway: a brief overview. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai), 43(10), 745-756. doi:10.1093/abbs/gmr079

Du, J., Zu, Y., Li, J., Du, S., Xu, Y., Zhang, L., . . . Yang, C. (2016). Extracellular matrix stiffness dictates Wnt expression through integrin pathway. Sci Rep, 6, 20395. doi:10.1038/srep20395

Foulquier, S., Daskalopoulos, E. P., Lluri, G., Hermans, K. C. M., Deb, A., & Blankesteijn, W. M. (2018). WNT Signaling in Cardiac and Vascular Disease. Pharmacol Rev, 70(1), 68-141. doi:10.1124/pr.117.013896

Hua, Y., Yang, Y., Li, Q., He, X., Zhu, W., Wang, J., & Gan, X. (2018). Oligomerization of Frizzled and LRP5/6 protein initiates intracellular signaling for the canonical WNT/beta-catenin pathway. J Biol Chem, 293(51), 19710-19724. doi:10.1074/jbc.RA118.004434

Jiang, X., Charlat, O., Zamponi, R., Yang, Y., & Cong, F. (2015). Dishevelled promotes Wnt receptor degradation through recruitment of ZNRF3/RNF43 E3 ubiquitin ligases. Mol Cell, 58(3), 522-533. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.03.015

Katoh, M. (2001). Molecular cloning and characterization of human WNT3. International journal of oncology, 19(5), 977-982. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11604997

Kusserow, A., Pang, K., Sturm, C., Hrouda, M., Lentfer, J., Schmidt, H. A., . . . Holstein, T. W. (2005). Unexpected complexity of the Wnt gene family in a sea anemone. Nature, 433(7022), 156-160. doi:10.1038/nature03158

Lai, S. L., Chien, A. J., & Moon, R. T. (2009). Wnt/Fz signaling and the cytoskeleton: potential roles in tumorigenesis. Cell Res, 19(5), 532-545. doi:10.1038/cr.2009.41

MacDonald, B. T., Tamai, K., & He, X. (2009). Wnt/beta-catenin signaling: components, mechanisms, and diseases. Dev Cell, 17(1), 9-26. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2009.06.016

Mohammed, M. K., Shao, C., Wang, J., Wei, Q., Wang, X., Collier, Z., . . . Lee, M. J. (2016). Wnt/beta-catenin signaling plays an ever-expanding role in stem cell self-renewal, tumorigenesis and cancer chemoresistance. Genes Dis, 3(1), 11-40. doi:10.1016/j.gendis.2015.12.004

Nile, A. H., Mukund, S., Stanger, K., Wang, W., & Hannoush, R. N. (2017). Unsaturated fatty acyl recognition by Frizzled receptors mediates dimerization upon Wnt ligand binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 114(16), 4147-4152. doi:10.1073/pnas.1618293114

Saha, S., Aranda, E., Hayakawa, Y., Bhanja, P., Atay, S., Brodin, N. P., . . . Pollard, J. W. (2016). Macrophage-derived extracellular vesicle-packaged WNTs rescue intestinal stem cells and enhance survival after radiation injury. Nature Communications, 7(1), 13096. doi:10.1038/ncomms13096

Saito-Diaz, K., Chen, T. W., Wang, X., Thorne, C. A., Wallace, H. A., Page-McCaw, A., & Lee, E. (2013). The way Wnt works: components and mechanism. Growth Factors, 31(1), 1-31. doi:10.3109/08977194.2012.752737

Wang, B., Tang, Z., Gong, H., Zhu, L., & Liu, X. (2017). Wnt5a promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer. Biosci Rep, 37(6). doi:10.1042/BSR20171092

Willert, K., & Nusse, R. (2012). Wnt proteins. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 4(9), a007864. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a007864

Zeng, H., Lu, B., Zamponi, R., Yang, Z., Wetzel, K., Loureiro, J., . . . Cong, F. (2018). mTORC1 signaling suppresses Wnt/beta-catenin signaling through DVL-dependent regulation of Wnt receptor FZD level. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 115(44), E10362-E10369. doi:10.1073/pnas.1808575115

Zhou, Y., Huang, Y., Cao, X., Xu, J., Zhang, L., Wang, J., . . . Zheng, M. (2016). WNT2 Promotes Cervical Carcinoma Metastasis and Induction of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. PLoS One, 11(8), e0160414. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160414

Ziv, E., Yarmohammadi, H., Boas, F. E., Petre, E. N., Brown, K. T., Solomon, S. B., . . . Erinjeri, J. P. (2017). Gene Signature Associated with Upregulation of the Wnt/beta-Catenin Signaling Pathway Predicts Tumor Response to Transarterial Embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 28(3), 349-355 e341. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2016.11.004

Event: 1755: beta-catenin activation

Short Name: beta-catenin activation

Key Event Component

Process Object Action
regulation of beta-catenin-TCF complex assembly beta-catenin-TCF complex occurrence

AOPs Including This Key Event

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Cellular

Cell term

Cell term
cell

Organ term

Organ term
organ

Domain of Applicability

Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
Homo sapiens Homo sapiens High NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
All life stages Moderate
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Unspecific High

Beta-catenin is stabilized and translocated into nucleus in Homo sapiens (Huang et al., 2019).

Beta-catenin is activated in Homo sapiens (Huang et al., 2019) (Naujok et al., 2014).

Key Event Description

Upon the Wnt signaling activation, beta-catenin is stabilized and activated via inhibition of the phosphorylation by GSK3beta (Huang et al., 2019). Once the beta-catenin is stabilized, it translocates into the nucleus and enhances the expression of target genes of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway (Huang et al., 2019). Beta-catenin activation is related to cancer (Tanabe, 2014).

Dishevelled (DVL), a positive regulator of Wnt signaling, forms the complex with FZD and leads to trigger the Wnt signaling together with Wnt coreceptor low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor-related protein 6 (LRP6) (Clevers & Nusse, 2012; Jiang, et al., 2015). DVL, however, has a controversial role to promote Wnt receptor degradation (Jiang et al., 2015). Meanwhile, DVL-dependent regulation of FZD level is involved in mTORC1 signaling suppression via Wnt/beta-catenin signaling (Zeng et al., 2018). The recruitment of Axin to the DVL-FZD complex induces the beta-catenin stabilization and activation. The stabilized beta-catenin translocates into the nucleus, which forms the complex with TCF to induce the up-regulated expression of proliferation-related genes.

How it is Measured or Detected

The beta-catenin level in nucleus is measured by immunoblotting with anti-beta-catenin antibody (Huang et al., 2019).

The beta-catenin nuclear translocation is measured by immunofluorescence assay (Huang et al., 2019).

Activity of beta-catenin is measured by Wnt/beta-catenin activity assay, in which the vector containing the firefly luciferase gene controlled by TCF/LEF binding sites is transfected in the cells (Naujok et al., 2014).

References

Clevers, H., & Nusse, R. (2012). Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and disease. Cell, 149(6), 1192-1205. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.012

Huang, J. Q., Wei, F. K., Xu, X. L., Ye, S. X., Song, J. W., Ding, P. K., . . . Gong, L. Y. (2019). SOX9 drives the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in non-small-cell lung cancer through the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. J Transl Med, 17(1), 143. doi:10.1186/s12967-019-1895-2

Jiang, X., Charlat, O., Zamponi, R., Yang, Y., & Cong, F. (2015). Dishevelled promotes Wnt receptor degradation through recruitment of ZNRF3/RNF43 E3 ubiquitin ligases. Mol Cell, 58(3), 522-533. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.03.015

Naujok, O., Lentes, J., Diekmann, U., Davenport, C., & Lenzen, S. (2014). Cytotoxicity and activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in mouse embryonic stem cells treated with four GSK3 inhibitors. BMC Res Notes, 7, 273. doi:10.1186/1756-0500-7-273

Tanabe, S. (2014). Role of mesenchymal stem cells in cell life and their signaling. World journal of stem cells, 6(1), 24-32. doi:10.4252/wjsc.v6.i1.24

Zeng, H., Lu, B., Zamponi, R., Yang, Z., Wetzel, K., Loureiro, J., . . . Cong, F. (2018). mTORC1 signaling suppresses Wnt/beta-catenin signaling through DVL-dependent regulation of Wnt receptor FZD level. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 115(44), E10362-E10369. doi:10.1073/pnas.1808575115

Event: 1650: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition

Short Name: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition

Key Event Component

Process Object Action
epithelial to mesenchymal transition cellular_component occurrence

AOPs Including This Key Event

Stressors

Name
GOLPH3
LiCl
D-2-hydroxyglutarate

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Tissue

Cell term

Cell term
cell

Organ term

Organ term
organ

Evidence for Perturbation by Stressor

GOLPH3

GOLPH3 induces EMT (Sun et al., 2017).

LiCl

LiCl induces EMT (Fang et al., 2018).

D-2-hydroxyglutarate

D-2-hydroxyglutarate induces EMT (Colvin et al., 2016).

Domain of Applicability

Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
Homo sapiens Homo sapiens High NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
All life stages High
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Unspecific High
  • Wnt5a expression leads to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer in Homo sapiens (Wang et al., 2017).
  • WNT2 expression lead to EMT induction in Homo sapiens (Zhou et al., 2016).
  • EMT is induced in cancer and involved in cancer metastasis in Homo sapiens (Suarez-Carmona, Lesage, Cataldo, & Gilles, 2017) (Du & Shim, 2016).

Key Event Description

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a phenomenon in which the cells transit from epithelial-like into mesenchymal-like phenotypes (Huan et al., 2022; Tanabe, 2017; Tanabe et al., 2015). In cancer, cells exhibiting EMT features contribute to metastasis and drug resistance.

It is known that D-2-hydroxyglurate induces EMT (Guerra et al., 2017; Jia et al., 2018; Mishra et al., 2018; Sciacovelli & Frezza, 2017). D-2-hydroxyglurate, an inhibitor of Jumonji-family histone demethylase, increased the trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) in the promoter region of the zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1), followed by the induction of EMT (Colvin et al., 2016).

Wnt5a induces EMT and metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer (Wang et al., 2017).

EMT is related to Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and is important for treatment-resistant cancer (Tanabe et al., 2016)

TGFbeta induces EMT (Wendt et al., 2010).

ZEB is one of the critical transcription factors for EMT regulation (Zhang et al., 2015).

SNAI1 (Snail) is an important transcription factor for cell differentiation and survival. The phosphorylation and nuclear localization of Snail1 induced by Wnt signaling pathways are critical for the regulation of EMT (Kaufhold & Bonavida, 2014).

Transcription factors SNAI1 and TWIST1 induce EMT (Hodge et al., 2018) (Mani et al., 2008)

It is suggested that Sp1, a transcription factor involved in cell growth and metastasis, is induced by cytochrome P450 1B1 (CYP1B1), and promotes EMT, which leads to cell proliferation and metastasis (Kwon et al., 2016).

How it is Measured or Detected

  • EMT can be detected by immunostaining with pro-surfactant protein-C (pro-SPC) and N-cadherin in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) lung in vivo (Kim et al., 2006).
  • EMT can be detected by immunostaining with vimentin in lung alveola in vivo (Kim et al., 2006).
  • EMT can be detected as the increased level of the transcription factors, zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox (ZEB), Twist and Snail (Huang et al., 2022).

References

Colvin, H., Nishida, N., Konno, M., Haraguchi, N., Takahashi, H., Nishimura, J., . . . Ishii, H. (2016). Oncometabolite D-2-Hydroxyglurate Directly Induces Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and is Associated with Distant Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer. Sci Rep, 6, 36289. doi:10.1038/srep36289

Du, B., & Shim, J. S. (2016). Targeting Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) to Overcome Drug Resistance in Cancer. Molecules, 21(7). doi:10.3390/molecules21070965

Fang, C. X., Ma, C. M., Jiang, L., Wang, X. M., Zhang, N., Ma, J. N., . . . Zhao, Y. D. (2018). p38 MAPK is Crucial for Wnt1- and LiCl-Induced Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition. Curr Med Sci, 38(3), 473-481. doi:10.1007/s11596-018-1903-4

Guerra, F., Guaragnella, N., Arbini, A. A., Bucci, C., Giannattasio, S., & Moro, L. (2017). Mitochondrial Dysfunction: A Novel Potential Driver of Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Cancer. Front Oncol, 7, 295. doi:10.3389/fonc.2017.00295

Hodge, D. Q., Cui, J., Gamble, M. J., & Guo, W. (2018). Histone Variant MacroH2A1 Plays an Isoform-Specific Role in Suppressing Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. Sci Rep, 8(1), 841. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-19364-4

Huan, Z., Zhang, Z., Zhou, C., Liu, L., Huang, C. (2022). Epithelial-mesenchymal transition: The history, regulatory mechanism, and cancer therapeutic opportunities. MedComm. 2022 May 18;3(2):e144. doi: 10.1002/mco2.144

Jia, D., Park, J. H., Jung, K. H., Levine, H., & Kaipparettu, B. A. (2018). Elucidating the Metabolic Plasticity of Cancer: Mitochondrial Reprogramming and Hybrid Metabolic States. Cells, 7(3). doi:10.3390/cells7030021

Kaufhold, S., & Bonavida, B. (2014). Central role of Snail1 in the regulation of EMT and resistance in cancer: a target for therapeutic intervention. J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 33, 62. doi:10.1186/s13046-014-0062-0

Kim, K. K., Kugler, M. C., Wolters, P. J., Robillard, L., Galvez, M. G., Brumwell, A. N., . . . Chapman, H. A. (2006). Alveolar epithelial cell mesenchymal transition develops in vivo during pulmonary fibrosis and is regulated by the extracellular matrix. PNAS, 103(35), 13180-13185. doi:10.1073/pnas.0605669103

Kwon, Y. J., Baek, H. S., Ye, D. J., Shin, S., Kim, D., & Chun, Y. J. (2016). CYP1B1 Enhances Cell Proliferation and Metastasis through Induction of EMT and Activation of Wnt/beta-Catenin Signaling via Sp1 Upregulation. PLoS One, 11(3), e0151598. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151598

Mani, S. A., Guo, W., Liao, M. J., Eaton, E. N., Ayyanan, A., Zhou, A. Y., . . . Weinberg, R. A. (2008). The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell, 133(4), 704-715. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.027

Mishra, P., Tang, W., Putluri, V., Dorsey, T. H., Jin, F., Wang, F., . . . Ambs, S. (2018). ADHFE1 is a breast cancer oncogene and induces metabolic reprogramming. J Clin Invest, 128(1), 323-340. doi:10.1172/JCI93815

Sciacovelli, M., & Frezza, C. (2017). Metabolic reprogramming and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cancer. FEBS J, 284(19), 3132-3144. doi:10.1111/febs.14090

Suarez-Carmona, M., Lesage, J., Cataldo, D., & Gilles, C. (2017). EMT and inflammation: inseparable actors of cancer progression. Mol Oncol, 11(7), 805-823. doi:10.1002/1878-0261.12095

Sun, J., Yang, X., Zhang, R., Liu, S., Gan, X., Xi, X., . . . Sun, Y. (2017). GOLPH3 induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition via Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Med, 6(4), 834-844. doi:10.1002/cam4.1040

Tanabe, S. (2017). Molecular markers and networks for cancer and stem cells. J Embryol Stem Cell Res, 1(1).

Tanabe, S., Kawabata, T., Aoyagi, K., Yokozaki, H., & Sasaki, H. (2016). Gene expression and pathway analysis of CTNNB1 in cancer and stem cells. World J Stem Cells, 8(11), 384-395. doi:10.4252/wjsc.v8.i11.384

Tanabe, S., Komatsu, M., Kazuhiko, A., Yokozaki, H., & Sasaki, H. (2015). Implications of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gastric cancer. Translational Gastrointestinal Cancer, 4(4), 258-264. Retrieved from http://tgc.amegroups.com/article/view/6996

Wang, B., Tang, Z., Gong, H., Zhu, L., & Liu, X. (2017). Wnt5a promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer. Biosci Rep, 37(6). doi:10.1042/BSR20171092

Wendt, M. K., Smith, J. A., & Schiemann, W. P. (2010). Transforming growth factor-beta-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition facilitates epidermal growth factor-dependent breast cancer progression. Oncogene, 29(49), 6485-6498. doi:10.1038/onc.2010.377

Zhang, P., Sun, Y., & Ma, L. (2015). ZEB1: at the crossroads of epithelial-mesenchymal transition, metastasis and therapy resistance. Cell Cycle, 14(4), 481-487. doi:10.1080/15384101.2015.1006048

Zhou, Y., Huang, Y., Cao, X., Xu, J., Zhang, L., Wang, J., . . . Zheng, M. (2016). WNT2 Promotes Cervical Carcinoma Metastasis and Induction of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. PLoS One, 11(8), e0160414. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160414

List of Adverse Outcomes in this AOP

Event: 1651: Treatment-resistant gastric cancer

Short Name: Resistant gastric cancer

Key Event Component

Process Object Action
regulation of cellular response to drug occurrence

AOPs Including This Key Event

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Tissue

Organ term

Organ term
organ

Domain of Applicability

Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
Homo sapiens Homo sapiens High NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
All life stages High
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Unspecific High

Drug resistance occurs in Homo sapiens (Du & Shim, 2016).

Key Event Description

It is known that diffuse-type gastric cancer, which has a poor prognosis, is treatment-resistant and more malignant compared to intestinal-type gastric cancer (Tanabe et al., 2014). Drug resistance is involved in EMT, which is an important phenomenon exhibiting features similar to cancer stem cells (CSCs) (Du & Shim, 2016).

EMT is involved in metastasis and cancer therapy resistance (Smith & Bhowmick, 2016).

How it is Measured or Detected

Treatment-resistant gastric cancer and EMT can be detected with biomarkers (Zeisberg & Neilson, 2009).

Treatment-resistant gastric cancer which exhibits EMT phenotype can be detected as the increased level of the transcription factors, zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1/2 (ZEB1/2), SNAI1/2, and TWIST2 which are associated with the activation of EMT-related genes (Tanabe et al., 2022a and 2022b).

Regulatory Significance of the AO

Drug resistance is very important in cancer treatment since cancer metastasis and recurrence are some of the main obstacles to treating cancer. Cancer stem cells that share the phenotype of EMT may be targeted in anti-cancer drug development. 

References

Du, B., & Shim, J. S. (2016). Targeting Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) to Overcome Drug Resistance in Cancer. Molecules, 21(7). doi:10.3390/molecules21070965

Smith, B. N., & Bhowmick, N. A. (2016). Role of EMT in Metastasis and Therapy Resistance. J Clin Med, 5(2). doi:10.3390/jcm5020017

Tanabe, S., Aoyagi, K., Yokozaki, H., Sasaki, H. (2014). Gene expression signatures for identifying diffuse-type gastric cancer associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition. International journal of oncology, 44(6), 1955-1970. doi:10.3892/ijo.2014.2387

Tanabe, S., Quader, S., Cabral, H., Ono, R. (2020a). Interplay of EMT and CSC in Cancer and the Potential Therapeutic Strategies. Front Pharmacol, 11, 904. doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.00904

Tanabe S, Quader S, Ono R, Cabral H, Aoyagi K, Hirose A, Yokozaki H., Sasaki, H. (2020b). Molecular Network Profiling in Intestinal- and Diffuse-Type Gastric Cancer. Cancers (Basel), 12(12), 3833. doi:10.3390/cancers12123833

Zeisberg, M., & Neilson, E. G. (2009). Biomarkers for epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. J Clin Invest, 119(6), 1429-1437. doi:10.1172/JCI36183

Appendix 2

List of Key Event Relationships in the AOP