This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.

Relationship: 2866

Title

A descriptive phrase which clearly defines the two KEs being considered and the sequential relationship between them (i.e., which is upstream, and which is downstream). More help

SDH, inhibited leads to Superoxide generation, increased

Upstream event
The causing Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help
Downstream event
The responding Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help

Key Event Relationship Overview

The utility of AOPs for regulatory application is defined, to a large extent, by the confidence and precision with which they facilitate extrapolation of data measured at low levels of biological organisation to predicted outcomes at higher levels of organisation and the extent to which they can link biological effect measurements to their specific causes.Within the AOP framework, the predictive relationships that facilitate extrapolation are represented by the KERs. Consequently, the overall WoE for an AOP is a reflection in part, of the level of confidence in the underlying series of KERs it encompasses. Therefore, describing the KERs in an AOP involves assembling and organising the types of information and evidence that defines the scientific basis for inferring the probable change in, or state of, a downstream KE from the known or measured state of an upstream KE. More help

AOPs Referencing Relationship

AOP Name Adjacency Weight of Evidence Quantitative Understanding Point of Contact Author Status OECD Status
Succinate dehydrogenase inhibition leading to increased insulin resistance through reduction in circulating thyroxine adjacent High Low Simon Thomas (send email) Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite

Taxonomic Applicability

Latin or common names of a species or broader taxonomic grouping (e.g., class, order, family) that help to define the biological applicability domain of the KER.In general, this will be dictated by the more restrictive of the two KEs being linked together by the KER.  More help

Sex Applicability

An indication of the the relevant sex for this KER. More help

Life Stage Applicability

An indication of the the relevant life stage(s) for this KER.  More help

Key Event Relationship Description

Provides a concise overview of the information given below as well as addressing details that aren’t inherent in the description of the KEs themselves. More help

Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) is a 4 subunit mitochondrial enzyme that oxidises succinate to fumarate, with the corresponding reduction of FAD to FADH2. FADH2 is subsequently reoxidised by transfer of electrons to the mitochondrial electron transfer chain (ETC). SDH thus links the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle to mitochondrial electron transfer. It is the only TCA cycle enzyme to be embedded in the mitochondrial inner membrane, as opposed to located free in the mitochondrial matrix, comprising complex II of the ETC. The mitochondrial ETC is the largest source of superoxide radicals in most mammalian cells, complex II being one source of those radicals.

Inhibition of mammalian complex II activity has been recorded for many chemicals, including fungicides, other environmental chemicals and pharmaceuticals, being associated with an increase in superoxide generation in some instances. Because of the size and complexity of complex II, with multipled potential binding sites for inhibitors, generation of superoxide radical is not, per se, a guaranteed outcome of inhibition of succinate oxidation. The site and nature of the enzyme-inhibitor interaction is potential determining factor.

This KER is concerned with the direct reversible or irreversible binding of inhibitory chemicals to complex II, leading to a reduction in the dehydrogenation of succinate, and the potential for consequent generation of mitochondrial superoxide radicals. Other effects, such as reduction in expression of complex II components, are not covered.

Evidence Collection Strategy

Include a description of the approach for identification and assembly of the evidence base for the KER. For evidence identification, include, for example, a description of the sources and dates of information consulted including expert knowledge, databases searched and associated search terms/strings.  Include also a description of study screening criteria and methodology, study quality assessment considerations, the data extraction strategy and links to any repositories/databases of relevant references.Tabular summaries and links to relevant supporting documentation are encouraged, wherever possible. More help

The following search was executed in Pubmed on 27/04/2023:

("complex II"[Title] and inhibit* and mitochond*) OR ("succinate dehydrogenase" AND inhibition)

generating 2341 hits. In order to reduce the hits to a more tractable set a further specification of "superoxide" was added to the second bracketed term

("complex II"[Title] and inhibit* and mitochond*) OR ("succinate dehydrogenase" AND inhibition AND superoxide)

generating 286 hits whose abstracts were reviewed for further reference to direct chemical inhibition of SDH or complex II activity. As the search term contains "superoxide", some hits from this search also included information about potential impact on superoxide generation. Several articles provided evidence for multiple interactions by a chemical that could also potentially give rise to increase in superoxide concentrations (e.g. interactions at both ETC complexes II and III). Such articles have not been cited as supporting evidence for this KER. In those articles that have been cited in support of this KER, the lack of evidence presented for additional interactions, other than SDH inhibition, that could potentially give rise to increased superoxide production does not rule out the possibility of such interactions being observed in the future.

Evidence Supporting this KER

Addresses the scientific evidence supporting KERs in an AOP setting the stage for overall assessment of the AOP. More help

Evidence is provided in terms of (i) the biological plausibility of the KER, and (ii) empirical evidence that supports, quantitatively or qualitatively, the manifestation of the relationship in mammals in vivo, or in mammalian ex vivo or in vitro systems.

Biological Plausibility
Addresses the biological rationale for a connection between KEupstream and KEdownstream.  This field can also incorporate additional mechanistic details that help inform the relationship between KEs, this is useful when it is not practical/pragmatic to represent these details as separate KEs due to the difficulty or relative infrequency with which it is likely to be measured.   More help
  1. multiple inhibitors of SDH/mitochondrial complex II are known,
  2. interference with the mitochondrial ETC is widely known to result in generation of excess superoxide,
  3. complex II is known to be able to generate superoxide radical under certain conditions.

Consequently, inhibition of SDH/complex II is potentially liable to alter the production of superoxide radicals.

Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
Addresses inconsistencies or uncertainties in the relationship including the identification of experimental details that may explain apparent deviations from the expected patterns of concordance. More help

Known modulating factors

This table captures specific information on the MF, its properties, how it affects the KER and respective references.1.) What is the modulating factor? Name the factor for which solid evidence exists that it influences this KER. Examples: age, sex, genotype, diet 2.) Details of this modulating factor. Specify which features of this MF are relevant for this KER. Examples: a specific age range or a specific biological age (defined by...); a specific gene mutation or variant, a specific nutrient (deficit or surplus); a sex-specific homone; a certain threshold value (e.g. serum levels of a chemical above...) 3.) Description of how this modulating factor affects this KER. Describe the provable modification of the KER (also quantitatively, if known). Examples: increase or decrease of the magnitude of effect (by a factor of...); change of the time-course of the effect (onset delay by...); alteration of the probability of the effect; increase or decrease of the sensitivity of the downstream effect (by a factor of...) 4.) Provision of supporting scientific evidence for an effect of this MF on this KER. Give a list of references.  More help
Response-response Relationship
Provides sources of data that define the response-response relationships between the KEs.  More help
Time-scale
Information regarding the approximate time-scale of the changes in KEdownstream relative to changes in KEupstream (i.e., do effects on KEdownstream lag those on KEupstream by seconds, minutes, hours, or days?). More help

Reversible or irreversible binding to, and inhibition of, succinate dehydrogenase potentially occurs within seconds or minutes of exposure in in vitro or in vivo systems. In the presence of continued inhibition, superoxide concentrations build up in respiring mitochondria or cells occurs over a period of minutes to hours. The consequent downstream increases in intracellular superoxide generation can have multiple impacts on affected cells, leading to inhibition of susceptible enzymes, changes in enzyme expression levels and apoptosis. These changes can occur within minutes to hours of exposure. Thus, separating the proximal manifestation of the KER - the production of superoxide - from the distal manifestation of consequent events - is limited to a period of seconds to minutes for practical interpretation, relatively free of the downstream consequences.

ROS generation in DB-1 cells has been observed during 4 h incubations with lonidamine and with TTFA (Guo et al, 2016).

Known Feedforward/Feedback loops influencing this KER
Define whether there are known positive or negative feedback mechanisms involved and what is understood about their time-course and homeostatic limits. More help

 

Domain of Applicability

A free-text section of the KER description that the developers can use to explain their rationale for the taxonomic, life stage, or sex applicability structured terms. More help

The simultaneous inibition of the reduction of succinate to fumarate, and the generation of ROS has been demonstrated in isolated mouse liver mitochondria (Guo et al, 2016)

References

List of the literature that was cited for this KER description. More help

Chen, L. et al (2021) "Citrus-derived DHCP inhibits mitochondrial complex II to enhance TRAIL sensitivity via ROS-induced DR5 upregulation", Journal of Biological Chemistry, Vol 296, 100515

Guo, L. et al (2016) "Inhibition of Mitochondrial Complex II by the Anticancer Agent Lonidamine", Journal of Biological Chemistry, Vol 291, pp42-57.