This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
Relationship: 3469
Title
Decreased, LH Surge leads to Impaired ovulation
Upstream event
Downstream event
Key Event Relationship Overview
AOPs Referencing Relationship
| AOP Name | Adjacency | Weight of Evidence | Quantitative Understanding | Point of Contact | Author Status | OECD Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decreased, GnRH pulsatility/release leading to estradiol availability, increased via impaired ovulation | adjacent | High | High | Martina Panzarea (send email) | Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite |
Taxonomic Applicability
| Term | Scientific Term | Evidence | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vertebrates | Vertebrates | NCBI |
Sex Applicability
| Sex | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Female |
Life Stage Applicability
| Term | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Adult, reproductively mature |
Key Event Relationship Description
Luteinizing hormone (LH) is a gonadotropin that is necessary for sexual maturation, ovulation, and therefore fertility. It is part of the glycoprotein hormone family and is organized as a heterodimer with a common α-subunit and a specific β-subunit (Padmanabhan et al., 2018). An LH surge is needed and responsible for the downstream pathways that induce ovulation; this includes resumption of meiosis in the oocyte and cellular changes that allow rupture of the follicle to release the egg for fertilization. It increases intrafollicular proteolytic enzymes, weakening the wall of the ovary and allowing for passage of the mature follicle (Robker et al., 2018).
As follicles grow, estrogen synthesis increases in the female ovary. This in turn promotes GnRH pulses in the hypothalamus and increases the levels of luteinizing hormone (LH) released from the anterior pituitary. The circulating LH can then interact with its receptor (LHCGR) in antral follicles and stimulate ovulation (Duffy et al., 2019). In addition to LH, which is eliminated from the serum quickly, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), usually secreted during pregnancy, has a higher affinity with the receptor LHCGR and found longer in the serum than LH. Therefore, hCG is preferentially used for ovulation stimulation in fertility treatments for women and in animal studies (Russell and Robker, 2007).
Without the LH surge, the downstream pathways are not able to function and as a result, ovulation does not occur. If the LH surge is delayed, then ovulation may be delayed as well and fails to occur within the correct time window. This can have a negative impact on the reproductive health of females and perturb the estrous cycle.
Evidence Collection Strategy
The development of the KER is based on structured literature review of records. Description for KER is based on reviews and books on the topic. The method used are described in Annex B.1.
Evidence Supporting this KER
Biological Plausibility
The LH surge is a tightly controlled phenomenon in female reproductive cycles. Ovulation must occur within a specific window in the estrous cycle as the body prepares for a potential pregnancy.
Physiologically, the LH surge induces the activation of many signalling cascades that are needed to provoke ovulation. LH through its receptor, LHCGR, increases the intracellular cAMP that activates the PKA pathway. This is considered the canonical pathway activated by LH. PKA then can activate CREB that is then translocated to the nucleus for transcription of target genes needed for ovulation. In addition, the LH surge is also necessary for the activation of Erk 1/2. The activation of the Erk1/2 and MAPK pathway allows activation of EGF-like ligands important for cumulus oocyte complex (COC) expansion as well as transcription factors such as C/EBPα/β that induce expression of genes essential for follicular rupture, both being important steps for correct ovulation. An increase in progesterone receptor (PGR) expression, due to the LH surge, is observed in granulosa cells of preovulatory follicles in most species examined, including humans, rodents and monkeys, leading to the increase in progesterone locally. Several PGR regulated genes have been demonstrated to play critical roles in ovulation, including proteases ADAMST1 and CTSL that break down the follicular wall at the time of ovulation. Following the LH surge, the granulosa cells have an increase in inflammatory genes (such as COX2) in addition to the proteases (Duffy et al., 2019; Robker et al., 2018).
Issues can arise in one of these pathways leading to subsequent problems in ovulation. In addition, it has been shown in many studies that without this surge or with a delayed surge, ovulation is perturbed.
Empirical Evidence
Evidence in Rodents: A few knockout mouse strains have been studied extensively to investigate ovulation and hormonal changes in female mice. For example, a study generated LHCGR knockouts and characterized their phenotype. As expected, these female mice were sterile with delayed ovulation and decreased level of serum and ovarian estradiol and progesterone with an increase in serum LH but no difference in pituitary LH levels (Lei et al., 2001; Zhang et al., 2001). Another study focused directly on LH action and created a LHβ knockout and found that the female mice were sterile. Although theca cell morphology looked normal, oocytes degenerated, serum levels of progesterone and estradiol reduced and steroidogenic enzyme expression (Cyp11a1, Cyp19a1, Cyp17a1) decreased. In addition, estrous cycles were abnormal, and no ovulation was observed (Ma et al., 2004, see also Table 2).
Evidence in humans: Although mutations in LH or its receptor are rare, in certain families, these mutations were found. Individuals with mutations in the LH receptor were considered “LH resistant” as they do not respond to LH. The women from the different families had similar phenotypes and were shown to exhibit normal puberty but found to have amenorrhea and were not fertile (Latronico et al., 1996, 1998; Prado Arnhold et al., 1997; Stavrou et al., 1998; Toledo et al., 1996, see also Table 3) .
Table 2. Evidence in rodents
|
Mouse models |
Observations |
Reference |
|
LHβ KO |
Infertility was observed in both sexes as well as perturbed gonadal growth. Estradiol and progesterone level were decreased compared to control and degenerating antral follicles were found. In addition, genes coding for steroid biosynthesis enzymes demonstrated a decreased expression and the expression of COX2, (a marker for ovulation) was also reduced. |
(Ma et al., 2004) |
|
LH/hCG receptor KO (Deletion of promotor region and most of exon 1) |
Male and female mice were infertile. Females contained smaller gonads with underdeveloped genitalia and no preovulatory follicles were observed. |
(Lei et al., 2001) |
|
LuRKO (Deletion of exon 11) |
The female Kos ovaries weighed less than control and had delayed vaginal opening to 35-38 days compared to 30-32 days in WT mice. No preovulatory follicles were found. |
(Zhang et al., 2001) |
Table 3. Evidence in humans
|
Humans |
Observations (case studies) |
Reference |
|
LH receptor mutation c.1345G>A (p.Ala449Thr) |
The patient had compromised ovulation with normal LH levels, but with LH resistance in a 27-year-old in China from a non-consanguineous family. |
(Yuan et al., 2017) |
|
LHCGR heterozygous mutation (inactivating mutation on exon1) |
The 33-year-old woman presented ovarian cysts and amenorrhea and low oocyte yield. |
(Bentov et al., 2012) |
|
LH receptor mutation (Substitution of K354 into E) |
A 46, XX sibling displayed normal external genitalia and breast development but has primary amenorrhea. |
(Stavrou et al., 1998) |
|
LH receptor mutation (ΔL608, V609) |
The 46, XX woman exhibited oligomenorrhea. |
(Latronico et al., 1998) |
|
LH receptor abnormalities |
This study shows a woman with normal pubertal development, rare menses, infertility, polycystic ovaries, and no ovulation (lack of corpus luteum). They believe the mutation lies with the receptor due to an absence of response to LH and phenotype of However, they were not able to locate a mutation on the LH receptor. |
(Prado Arnhold et al., 1997) |
|
LH receptor mutation (Substitution of Arg554 into a STOP codon) |
The 46, XX woman in this family had normal external genitalia but had cystic ovaries of unequal size and amenorrhea. Another woman from a different family also presented this mutation with secondary amenorrhea and elevated levels of LH, anovulation and no corpus luteum formation. |
(Latronico et al., 1996; Tsigos et al., 1997) |
|
LH receptor mutation (Substitution of A593 to P) |
The female sibling exhibited primary amenorrhea, a smaller uterus, abnormal menses, no preovulatory follicles and infertility. |
(Toledo et al., 1996) |
Evidence through downstream targets of LH:
Erk1/2 mouse Kos (conditional in granulosa cells): The mice were sterile with lack of meiotic resumption of the oocytes, absence of luteinization as well as inhibition of ovulation (Fan et al., 2009).
C/EBP mouse Kos (conditional in granulosa cells): The mice exhibited a similar phenotype to the Erk1/2 knockouts as expected, since C/EBP is downstream to Erk1/2. However, although there was lack of ovulation, the oocytes were able to resume meiosis and mature but were trapped and could not be released from the follicle (Fan et al., 2011; Sterneck et al., 1997).
PGR KOs; In this case, follicle growth was normal and luteinization was completed, but no ovulation occurred with no corpus luteum because follicle rupture was inhibited and therefore there was no COC release (Kim et al., 2009; Lydon et al., 1995).
Evidence through other factors affecting LH:
Pituitary-specific p62−/− mice: p26 is an important protein in metabolic processes. Lack of p26 in pituitary induces fertility issues. The authors investigated the role of p26 in female reproduction. They found that p26 is important for LH expression and release through mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, and without p26, LH levels are very low leading to a decrease in ovulation, lack of corpus luteum and less pups (X. Li et al., 2021).
microRNAs KOs:
miR-29a/b1 KO mice were generated to observe its role in reproduction. MicroRNAs regulate gene expression by inhibiting expression of mRNAs. Part of the miR29 family of mature miRNAs, this KO had ovulatory problems with a strong decrease of observable corpus lutea thought to be due to low LH serum levels. Although the molecular mechanism of miR29 is still unknown, this study shows again a clear correlation between issues with LH levels and anovulation (Guo et al., 2021).
Two other microRNAs also seem to play an essential role in female fertility in mice. miR-200b and miR-429 double KO mice had low levels of LHβ and therefore anovulation. The authors hypothesize that this is due to higher expression of one of their targets, ZEB1, however, the exact mechanism is still unknown (Hasuwa et al., 2013).
Evidence through stressors:
A variety of stressors have been shown to affect the LH surge which in turn disrupts ovulation.
Atrazine: Foradori et al., exposed SD and LE rats to atrazine through gavage for 4 days. No significant effect was observed for LE rats. However, starting from 50mg/kg of atrazine, there was a significant decrease in LH surge as well as a significant decrease in corpus lutea observed and ova shed (Foradori et al., 2014). A different study using human cumulus granulosa cells showed that exposure to 20µM of atrazine for 48h leads to a decrease of LHCGR mRNA expression as well as ovulatory markers EREG and AREG (Pogrmic-Majkic et al., 2018).
TCDD: One study showed that TCDD exposure leads to issues with ovulation that could be due to a decrease in LH levels. The SD rats were first stimulated with eCG and exposed to TCDD (0.3 - 60 µg/kg of TCDD). 72 hrs after the eCG stimulation, the authors observed the decrease of FSH and LH levels and a decrease in the number of rats that ovulated as well as a decrease of ova shed (ED50: 3-10 µg/kg) (X. L. Li et al., 1995).
Similarly, another study examined the effect of TCDD exposure on SD rats and compared it to PCDD exposure. They were exposed to 2-32 µg/kg of TCDD following this time PMSG stimulation. After 72 hours of the highest exposure, there was a decrease in LH levels, as well as FSH. They also noted an effect starting from 4 µg/kg on ovulation and ovarian weight (Gao et al., 1999).
PFOS: Using ICR mice, Wang et al., exposed the mice to PFOS (10mg/kg) for 30 days. Within 7 days, they observed a reduction of ovulation and a decrease of P4, LH, and GnRH (Wang et al., 2018).
In another study, ICR mice were exposed to 0.1mg/kg of PFOS for 6months. After 4 months of exposure there was a reduction of E2, P4, FSH, LH, and GnRH. Less antral and preovulatory follicles were found in these mice as well as less corpus lutea. In this study, they observe loss of body weight after 4 months, so in order to avoid this having an effect on reproductive function, they use mice exposed for 4months and not more. This seems to be an interesting point that most other studies do not underline or pay particular attention to (Feng et al., 2015).
GnRH antagonists: SD rats were exposed to Cetrorelix, a GnRH antagonist, for 30 days. LH levels were measured on day 0, 4, 10, 20, and 30 (before sacrifice). The levels of LH measured were lower on days 4 and 10 compared to control rats but interestingly increased back to a similar level to controls on day 20. The estrous cycle resembled that of anovulatory women. In addition, no corpus lutea were observed at sacrifice and no progesterone increase was measured, indicating a lack of ovulation in SD rats exposed to Cetrorelix (Horvath et al., 2004).
Dose and temporal concordance
See Annex B.3.
Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
Although the phenotypes of the different knockout models in mice resemble that of the women that exhibit mutations in either LH itself or its receptor, these studies investigate the absence of LH or LHCGR and not the surge itself. Animal models would be needed to directly investigate the surge by inhibiting the moment of the LH surge to confirm the direct relationship between this surge and ovulation regulation.
In addition, gain of function mutants may make these conclusions more complex. Transgenic mice were created expressing bovine LHβ tagged with a carboxyl terminal peptide of hCG that extends the half-life of LHβ (LHβ-CTP). When LHβ is highly secreted in pre-pubertal mice, several consequences arise. The authors observed either anovulation or infrequent ovulation as well as enlarged ovaries, cysts, and tumours. In addition, levels of ovarian hormones were affected, with higher levels of estrogen and testosterone (Risma et al., 1995, Risma et al., 1997). This indicates that all changes in LH dynamics may have an adverse effect on ovulation, and not just negative regulation. Interestingly, a study using gain of function for LHCGR (KiLHR (D582G)) in mice shows that some clear difference between species can occur. Unlike women with “activating” LHCGR mutations which have a normal phenotype, mice have irregular estrous cycles and anovulation. This shows that, at least in mice, having an increase in activity of LH receptor can have a negative impact on female fertility, but also shows the care that has to be taken to extrapolate data on rodents to humans (Hai et al., 2015).
Uncertainties and inconsistencies should be further explored.
Known modulating factors
Quantitative Understanding of the Linkage
Response-response Relationship
Time-scale
Known Feedforward/Feedback loops influencing this KER
Domain of Applicability
References
Arnhold IJ, Latronico AC, Batista MC, Carvalho FM, Chrousos GP and Mendonça BB, 1997. Ovarian resistance to luteinizing hormone: a novel cause of amenorrhea and infertility. Fertil Steril, 67:394-397. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81929-2
Bentov Y, Kenigsberg S and Casper RF, 2012. A novel luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor mutation associated with amenorrhea, low oocyte yield, and recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril, 97:1165-1168. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.002
Duffy DM, Ko C, Jo M, Brannstrom M and Curry TE, 2019. Ovulation: Parallels With Inflammatory Processes. Endocr Rev, 40:369-416. doi: 10.1210/er.2018-00075
Fan HY, Liu Z, Johnson PF and Richards JS, 2011. CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins (C/EBP)-α and -β are essential for ovulation, luteinization, and the expression of key target genes. Mol Endocrinol, 25:253-268. doi: 10.1210/me.2010-0318
Fan HY, Liu Z, Shimada M, Sterneck E, Johnson PF, Hedrick SM and Richards JS, 2009. MAPK3/1 (ERK1/2) in ovarian granulosa cells are essential for female fertility. Science, 324:938-941. doi: 10.1126/science.1171396
Feng X, Wang X, Cao X, Xia Y, Zhou R and Chen L, 2015. Chronic Exposure of Female Mice to an Environmental Level of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Suppresses Estrogen Synthesis Through Reduced Histone H3K14 Acetylation of the StAR Promoter Leading to Deficits in Follicular Development and Ovulation. Toxicol Sci, 148:368-379. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfv197
Foradori CD, Sawhney Coder P, Tisdel M, Yi KD, Simpkins JW, Handa RJ and Breckenridge CB, 2014. The effect of atrazine administered by gavage or in diet on the LH surge and reproductive performance in intact female Sprague-Dawley and Long Evans rats. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol, 101:262-275. doi: 10.1002/bdrb.21109
Gao X, Son D-S, Terranova PF and Rozman KK, 1999. Toxic Equivalency Factors of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins in an Ovulation Model: Validation of the Toxic Equivalency Concept for One Aspect of Endocrine Disruption. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 157:107-116. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/taap.1999.8649
Guo Y, Wu Y, Shi J, Zhuang H, Ci L, Huang Q, Wan Z, Yang H, Zhang M, Tan Y, Sun R, Xu L, Wang Z, Shen R and Fei J, 2021. miR-29a/b(1) Regulates the Luteinizing Hormone Secretion and Affects Mouse Ovulation. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 12:636220. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.636220
Hai L, McGee SR, Rabideau AC, Paquet M and Narayan P, 2015. Infertility in Female Mice with a Gain-of-Function Mutation in the Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Is Due to Irregular Estrous Cyclicity, Anovulation, Hormonal Alterations, and Polycystic Ovaries. Biol Reprod, 93:16. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.115.129072
Hasuwa H, Ueda J, Ikawa M and Okabe M, 2013. miR-200b and miR-429 function in mouse ovulation and are essential for female fertility. Science, 341:71-73. doi: 10.1126/science.1237999
Horvath JE, Toller GL, Schally AV, Bajo AM and Groot K, 2004. Effect of long-term treatment with low doses of the LHRH antagonist Cetrorelix on pituitary receptors for LHRH and gonadal axis in male and female rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 101:4996-5001. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400605101
Kim J, Bagchi IC and Bagchi MK, 2009. Control of ovulation in mice by progesterone receptor-regulated gene networks. Mol Hum Reprod, 15:821-828. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gap082
Latronico AC, Anasti J, Arnhold I, Rapaport R, Mendonca B, Bloise W, Castro M, Tsigos C and Chrousos G, 1996. Testicular and Ovarian Resistance to Luteinizing Hormone Caused by Inactivating Mutations of the Luteinizing Hormone–Receptor Gene. New England Journal of Medicine - N ENGL J MED, 334:507-512. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199602223340805
Latronico AC, Chai Y, Arnhold IJ, Liu X, Mendonca BB and Segaloff DL, 1998. A homozygous microdeletion in helix 7 of the luteinizing hormone receptor associated with familial testicular and ovarian resistance is due to both decreased cell surface expression and impaired effector activation by the cell surface receptor. Mol Endocrinol, 12:442-450. doi: 10.1210/mend.12.3.0077
Lei ZM, Mishra S, Zou W, Xu B, Foltz M, Li X and Rao CV, 2001. Targeted disruption of luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin receptor gene. Mol Endocrinol, 15:184-200. doi: 10.1210/mend.15.1.0586
Li X, Johnson DC and Rozman KK, 1995. Reproductive effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in female rats: ovulation, hormonal regulation, and possible mechanism(s). Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 133:321-327. doi: 10.1006/taap.1995.1157
Li X, Zhou L, Peng G, Liao M, Zhang L, Hu H, Long L, Tang X, Qu H, Shao J, Zheng H and Long M, 2021. Pituitary P62 deficiency leads to female infertility by impairing luteinizing hormone production. Exp Mol Med, 53:1238-1249. doi: 10.1038/s12276-021-00661-4
Lydon JP, DeMayo FJ, Funk CR, Mani SK, Hughes AR, Montgomery CA, Jr., Shyamala G, Conneely OM and O'Malley BW, 1995. Mice lacking progesterone receptor exhibit pleiotropic reproductive abnormalities. Genes Dev, 9:2266-2278. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.18.2266
Ma X, Dong Y, Matzuk MM and Kumar TR, 2004. Targeted disruption of luteinizing hormone beta-subunit leads to hypogonadism, defects in gonadal steroidogenesis, and infertility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 101:17294-17299. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404743101
Padmanabhan V, Puttabyatappa M and Cardoso R, 2018. Hypothalamus–Pituitary–Ovary Axis.
Pogrmic-Majkic K, Samardzija D, Stojkov-Mimic N, Vukosavljevic J, Trninic-Pjevic A, Kopitovic V and Andric N, 2018. Atrazine suppresses FSH-induced steroidogenesis and LH-dependent expression of ovulatory genes through PDE-cAMP signaling pathway in human cumulus granulosa cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol, 461:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2017.08.015
Risma KA, Clay CM, Nett TM, Wagner T, Yun J and Nilson JH, 1995. Targeted overexpression of luteinizing hormone in transgenic mice leads to infertility, polycystic ovaries, and ovarian tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 92:1322-1326. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.5.1322
Risma KA, Hirshfield AN and Nilson JH, 1997. Elevated luteinizing hormone in prepubertal transgenic mice causes hyperandrogenemia, precocious puberty, and substantial ovarian pathology. Endocrinology, 138:3540-3547. doi: 10.1210/endo.138.8.5313
Robker RL, Hennebold JD and Russell DL, 2018. Coordination of Ovulation and Oocyte Maturation: A Good Egg at the Right Time. Endocrinology, 159:3209-3218. doi: 10.1210/en.2018-00485
Russell DL and Robker RL, 2007. Molecular mechanisms of ovulation: co-ordination through the cumulus complex. Hum Reprod Update, 13:289-312. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dml062
Stavrou SS, Zhu YS, Cai LQ, Katz MD, Herrera C, Defillo-Ricart M and Imperato-McGinley J, 1998. A novel mutation of the human luteinizing hormone receptor in 46XY and 46XX sisters. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 83:2091-2098. doi: 10.1210/jcem.83.6.4855
Sterneck E, Tessarollo L and Johnson PF, 1997. An essential role for C/EBPbeta in female reproduction. Genes Dev, 11:2153-2162. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.17.2153
Toledo SP, Brunner HG, Kraaij R, Post M, Dahia PL, Hayashida CY and Kremer HTAP, 1996. An inactivating mutation of the luteinizing hormone receptor causes amenorrhea in a 46,XX female. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 81:3850-3854. doi: 10.1210/jcem.81.11.8923827
Tsigos C, Latronico C and Chrousos GP, 1997. Luteinizing hormone resistance syndromes. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 816:263-273. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb52150.x
Wang X, Bai Y, Tang C, Cao X, Chang F and Chen L, 2018. Impact of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate on Reproductive Ability of Female Mice through Suppression of Estrogen Receptor α-Activated Kisspeptin Neurons. Toxicological Sciences, 165:475-486. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfy167
Yuan P, He Z, Zheng L, Wang W, Li Y, Zhao H, Zhang VW, Zhang Q and Yang D, 2017. Genetic evidence of 'genuine' empty follicle syndrome: a novel effective mutation in the LHCGR gene and review of the literature. Hum Reprod, 32:944-953. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex015
Zhang FP, Poutanen M, Wilbertz J and Huhtaniemi I, 2001. Normal prenatal but arrested postnatal sexual development of luteinizing hormone receptor knockout (LuRKO) mice. Mol Endocrinol, 15:172-183. doi: 10.1210/mend.15.1.0582