The authors have designated this AOP as all rights reserved. Re-use in any form requires advanced permission from the authors.

AOP: 615

Title

A descriptive phrase which references both the Molecular Initiating Event and Adverse Outcome.It should take the form “MIE leading to AO”. For example, “Aromatase inhibition leading to reproductive dysfunction” where Aromatase inhibition is the MIE and reproductive dysfunction the AO. In cases where the MIE is unknown or undefined, the earliest known KE in the chain (i.e., furthest upstream) should be used in lieu of the MIE and it should be made clear that the stated event is a KE and not the MIE.  More help

Suppression of Keap1 cysteine oxidation leading to liver inflammation

Short name
A name that succinctly summarises the information from the title. This name should not exceed 90 characters. More help
Keap1 cysteine oxidation,liver failure
The current version of the Developer's Handbook will be automatically populated into the Handbook Version field when a new AOP page is created.Authors have the option to switch to a newer (but not older) Handbook version any time thereafter. More help
Handbook Version v2.7

Graphical Representation

A graphical representation of the AOP.This graphic should list all KEs in sequence, including the MIE (if known) and AO, and the pair-wise relationships (links or KERs) between those KEs. More help
Click to download graphical representation template Explore AOP in a Third Party Tool

Authors

The names and affiliations of the individual(s)/organisation(s) that created/developed the AOP. More help

Young Jun Kim1 and Bongsuk Choi2

1 KIST Europe, Saarbruecken 66123, Germany

2. Hanpoong Pharm & Foods Co., Ltd.11 Guretdeul 3-gil, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do, 54843, Republic of Korea. email : bongsuk333@hanpoong.co.kr

Point of Contact

The user responsible for managing the AOP entry in the AOP-KB and controlling write access to the page by defining the contributors as described in the next section.   More help
Young Jun Kim   (email point of contact)

Contributors

Users with write access to the AOP page.  Entries in this field are controlled by the Point of Contact. More help
  • Young Jun Kim

Coaches

This field is used to identify coaches who supported the development of the AOP.Each coach selected must be a registered author. More help

OECD Information Table

Provides users with information concerning how actively the AOP page is being developed and whether it is part of the OECD Workplan and has been reviewed and/or endorsed. OECD Project: Assigned upon acceptance onto OECD workplan. This project ID is managed and updated (if needed) by the OECD. OECD Status: For AOPs included on the OECD workplan, ‘OECD status’ tracks the level of review/endorsement of the AOP . This designation is managed and updated by the OECD. Journal-format Article: The OECD is developing co-operation with Scientific Journals for the review and publication of AOPs, via the signature of a Memorandum of Understanding. When the scientific review of an AOP is conducted by these Journals, the journal review panel will review the content of the Wiki. In addition, the Journal may ask the AOP authors to develop a separate manuscript (i.e. Journal Format Article) using a format determined by the Journal for Journal publication. In that case, the journal review panel will be required to review both the Wiki content and the Journal Format Article. The Journal will publish the AOP reviewed through the Journal Format Article. OECD iLibrary published version: OECD iLibrary is the online library of the OECD. The version of the AOP that is published there has been endorsed by the OECD. The purpose of publication on iLibrary is to provide a stable version over time, i.e. the version which has been reviewed and revised based on the outcome of the review. AOPs are viewed as living documents and may continue to evolve on the AOP-Wiki after their OECD endorsement and publication.   More help
OECD Project # OECD Status Reviewer's Reports Journal-format Article OECD iLibrary Published Version
This AOP was last modified on January 19, 2026 09:15

Revision dates for related pages

Page Revision Date/Time
Suppression of Keap1 cysteine oxidation November 04, 2025 10:12
NFE2/Nrf2 repression June 02, 2017 16:27
Increase, Ferroptosis April 07, 2022 09:20
Inflammation, Liver September 16, 2017 10:16
Increase, Lipid peroxidation October 08, 2024 04:22
Suppression of Keap1 cysteine oxidation leads to NFE2/Nrf2 repression November 04, 2025 10:18
Ferroptosis leads to Inflammation, Liver November 04, 2025 10:19
NFE2/Nrf2 repression leads to Increase, LPO January 19, 2026 09:15
Increase, LPO leads to Inflammation, Liver January 19, 2026 09:15
All-trans retinoic acid February 15, 2022 10:43
Brusatol November 04, 2025 10:27
ML385 November 04, 2025 10:27
Hydrogen peroxide May 19, 2019 17:21
Cadmium October 25, 2017 08:33
Zinc February 04, 2022 15:05

Abstract

A concise and informative summation of the AOP under development that can stand-alone from the AOP page. The aim is to capture the highlights of the AOP and its potential scientific and regulatory relevance. More help

The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) for Suppression of Keap1 cysteine oxidation Leading to Liver Failure describes a mechanistic sequence linking a redox-regulatory Molecular Initiating Event (MIE)—suppression of oxidation (or adduction) of reactive Keap1 cysteines—to the adverse outcome of liver failure. When Keap1 cysteines remain reduced, the Keap1–Cul3–RBX1 E3 ligase complex persistently ubiquitinates Nrf2, resulting in Nrf2 pathway inhibition. Because Nrf2 transactivates key antioxidant and thiol-metabolism genes (e.g., SLC7A11, GPX4, GCLC/GCLM, HO-1, NQO1), its inhibition diminishes glutathione/NADPH regeneration and cystine import, lowering the hepatocyte’s capacity to detoxify reactive species. This deficit predisposes membranes to lipid peroxidation overload (phospholipid hydroperoxides, PL-OOH), particularly under high labile iron and PUFA-rich conditions, and culminates in ferroptosis-biased hepatocellular death. Progression of cell death precipitates organ-level dysfunction—hyperbilirubinemia, coagulopathy (INR ≥1.5), encephalopathy, and marked transaminase elevation—defining liver failure. The pathway is supported by strong biological plausibility (Keap1–Nrf2 control of antioxidant/ferroptosis-resistance programs) and robust empirical evidence at early KEs (ARE-target suppression, redox capacity loss, lipid peroxidation). Rescue with Nrf2 activators (e.g., sulforaphane, tBHQ), thiol donors (GSH-EE, NAC), and ferroptosis antagonists (ferrostatin-1, liproxstatin-1, deferoxamine) provides functional support for KERs. Prototypical stressors include conditions or agents that maintain Keap1 in a reduction-competent, Nrf2-repressive state (excess thiol buffering; Keap1–Cul3 hyperactivity) or that indirectly depress Nrf2 tone. This AOP aids chemical hazard identification, supports read-across for redox-active materials, and guides discovery of liver-safe formulations by prioritizing protection of the Nrf2–SLC7A11–GPX4 axis.

AOP Development Strategy

Context

Used to provide background information for AOP reviewers and users that is considered helpful in understanding the biology underlying the AOP and the motivation for its development.The background should NOT provide an overview of the AOP, its KEs or KERs, which are captured in more detail below. More help

This AOP provides a mechanistic framework for how suppression of Keap1 cysteine oxidation keeps Nrf2 repressed, diminishing hepatocellular antioxidant capacity and promoting iron-dependent lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis, ultimately leading to liver failure. The Keap1–Nrf2 node integrates xenobiotic, oxidative, and metabolic stress in hepatocytes; its dysfunction has broad consequences for glutathione synthesis, cystine uptake (SLC7A11), NADPH homeostasis, detoxifying enzymes (NQO1, HO-1), and lipid peroxide reduction via GPX4. This pathway is relevant to pharmaceuticals, botanicals, industrial chemicals, and mixture contexts that dampen Nrf2 signaling or elevate iron/PUFA susceptibility. Applications span regulatory toxicology, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) risk assessment, and formulation design.

Strategy

Provides a description of the approaches to the identification, screening and quality assessment of the data relevant to identification of the key events and key event relationships included in the AOP or AOP network.This information is important as a basis to support the objective/envisaged application of the AOP by the regulatory community and to facilitate the reuse of its components.  Suggested content includes a rationale for and description of the scope and focus of the data search and identification strategy/ies including the nature of preliminary scoping and/or expert input, the overall literature screening strategy and more focused literature surveys to identify additional information (including e.g., key search terms, databases and time period searched, any tools used). More help

1. Identify and Characterize Key Events (KEs) 1.1 Molecular Initiating Event (MIE) Focus: Establish suppression of Keap1 cysteine oxidation as the MIE that keeps Keap1–Cul3 active and inhibits Nrf2. Approach:

  • Biotin-switch/LC–MS to quantify Keap1 cysteine oxidation/adducting status.

  • Nrf2 nuclear translocation (IF/Western) and ARE-luciferase assays ± redox modulators. Outcome: Define conditions that maintain reduced Keap1 and thresholds for Nrf2 suppression.

1.2 Downstream KEs Focus: Characterize the cascade from Nrf2 inhibition → loss of thiol/antioxidant capacity → lipid peroxidation overload → ferroptosis → liver failure. Approach:

  • qPCR/Western for SLC7A11, GPX4, GCLC/GCLM, HO-1, NQO1.

  • Redox metrics: GSH/GSSG, NADPH/NADP+, labile iron pool (calcein quench).

  • Lipid peroxidation: BODIPY-C11, 4-HNE/MDA, GPX4 activity.

  • Cell death mode: ferroptosis rescue (ferrostatin-1, liproxstatin-1, DFO) vs apoptosis markers.

  • Liver function readouts in vivo (ALT/AST, bilirubin, INR, ICG clearance). Outcome: Temporal and mechanistic links among KEs and AO.

2. Define Key Event Relationships (KERs) 2.1 Biological Plausibility

  • Map Keap1–Cul3–Nrf2 control to ARE gene networks that guard against lipid peroxidation/ferroptosis. 2.2 Empirical Support

  • Dose–response and time-course linking MIE/KE1 suppression to KE2 lipid peroxidation and KE4 cell death; rescue with Nrf2 activators/thiol donors/ferroptosis inhibitors. 2.3 Quantitative Understanding

  • Build response–response models: ARE-target suppression (KE1) vs BODIPY-C11 & GPX4 loss (KE2); KE composites vs ALT/AST/INR.

3. Address Modulating Factors

  • Age, baseline Nrf2 tone, iron overload, membrane PUFA/ACSL4, pentose-phosphate/NADPH capacity, co-medications that alter redox/iron.

4. Expand Domain of Applicability 4.1 Taxonomic: Human hepatocytes (primary, HepaRG), rodents; supportive evidence in other vertebrates. 4.2 Life Stage & Sex: Adult/aged livers (higher iron, comorbidities) often more sensitive; sex hormones may modulate iron handling and Nrf2 tone.

Summary of the AOP

This section is for information that describes the overall AOP.The information described in section 1 is entered on the upper portion of an AOP page within the AOP-Wiki. This is where some background information may be provided, the structure of the AOP is described, and the KEs and KERs are listed. More help

Events:

Molecular Initiating Events (MIE)
An MIE is a specialised KE that represents the beginning (point of interaction between a prototypical stressor and the biological system) of an AOP. More help
Key Events (KE)
A measurable event within a specific biological level of organisation. More help
Adverse Outcomes (AO)
An AO is a specialized KE that represents the end (an adverse outcome of regulatory significance) of an AOP. More help
Type Event ID Title Short name
MIE 2385 Suppression of Keap1 cysteine oxidation Suppression of Keap1 cysteine oxidation
KE 1417 NFE2/Nrf2 repression NFE2/Nrf2 repression
KE 1445 Increase, Lipid peroxidation Increase, LPO
KE 1994 Increase, Ferroptosis Ferroptosis
AO 902 Inflammation, Liver Inflammation, Liver

Relationships Between Two Key Events (Including MIEs and AOs)

This table summarizes all of the KERs of the AOP and is populated in the AOP-Wiki as KERs are added to the AOP.Each table entry acts as a link to the individual KER description page. More help
Title Adjacency Evidence Quantitative Understanding

Network View

This network graphic is automatically generated based on the information provided in the MIE(s), KEs, AO(s), KERs and Weight of Evidence (WoE) summary tables. The width of the edges representing the KERs is determined by its WoE confidence level, with thicker lines representing higher degrees of confidence. This network view also shows which KEs are shared with other AOPs. More help

Prototypical Stressors

A structured data field that can be used to identify one or more “prototypical” stressors that act through this AOP. Prototypical stressors are stressors for which responses at multiple key events have been well documented. More help

Life Stage Applicability

The life stage for which the AOP is known to be applicable. More help
Life stage Evidence
Adult, reproductively mature Moderate

Taxonomic Applicability

Latin or common names of a species or broader taxonomic grouping (e.g., class, order, family) can be selected.In many cases, individual species identified in these structured fields will be those for which the strongest evidence used in constructing the AOP was available. More help
Term Scientific Term Evidence Link
human and other cells in culture human and other cells in culture High NCBI
Rodentia sp. Rodentia sp. High NCBI

Sex Applicability

The sex for which the AOP is known to be applicable. More help
Sex Evidence
Male High
Female Moderate

Overall Assessment of the AOP

Addressess the relevant biological domain of applicability (i.e., in terms of taxa, sex, life stage, etc.) and Weight of Evidence (WoE) for the overall AOP as a basis to consider appropriate regulatory application (e.g., priority setting, testing strategies or risk assessment). More help

This AOP links a well-defined redox control point—Keap1–Cul3-mediated repression of Nrf2 maintained by suppression of Keap1 cysteine oxidation—to liver failure through coherent biochemical and cellular mechanisms. Biological plausibility is high; empirical support is strong for early KEs (Nrf2 inhibition; redox capacity loss; lipid peroxidation) and moderate–strong for hepatocellular ferroptosis contributing to organ-level failure. Further work should refine quantitative thresholds (e.g., composite KE2 scores that predict INR elevation) and characterize population variability (iron burden, baseline Nrf2 tone).

Domain of Applicability

Addressess the relevant biological domain(s) of applicability in terms of sex, life-stage, taxa, and other aspects of biological context. More help
Domain Relevance Evidence
Taxonomic Relevance Humans, rodents Conservation of Keap1–Nrf2; ferroptosis machinery conserved.
Life Stage Adults, elderly Higher iron burden and comorbidities increase sensitivity.
Sex Both Minor modulation possible via iron handling/hormones.
Molecular/Cellular Hepatocytes (Keap1–Nrf2–SLC7A11–GPX4) Central to redox and lipid-peroxide detox.
Stressors Redox-active environments inhibiting Keap1 Cys oxidation Map to chemicals/conditions that depress Nrf2 tone.

Essentiality of the Key Events

The essentiality of KEs can only be assessed relative to the impact of manipulation of a given KE (e.g., experimentally blocking or exacerbating the event) on the downstream sequence of KEs defined for the AOP. Consequently, evidence supporting essentiality is assembled on the AOP page, rather than on the independent KE pages that are meant to stand-alone as modular units without reference to other KEs in the sequence. The nature of experimental evidence that is relevant to assessing essentiality relates to the impact on downstream KEs and the AO if upstream KEs are prevented or modified. This includes: Direct evidence: directly measured experimental support that blocking or preventing a KE prevents or impacts downstream KEs in the pathway in the expected fashion. Indirect evidence: evidence that modulation or attenuation in the magnitude of impact on a specific KE (increased effect or decreased effect) is associated with corresponding changes (increases or decreases) in the magnitude or frequency of one or more downstream KEs. More help
Key Event (KE) Essentiality Rationale and Evidence
MIE: Suppression of Keap1 cysteine oxidation Strong Maintains Keap1–Cul3 repression of Nrf2; reversing with Nrf2 activators restores KE1.
KE1: Nrf2 pathway inhibition Strong Necessary for reductions in SLC7A11/GPX4; genetic/chemical rescue prevents downstream KEs.
KE2: Lipid-peroxidation overload Strong Required for ferroptosis; lipid peroxide scavengers/ferroptosis inhibitors block KE4.
KE3: Hepatocyte ferroptosis Strong Blocking ferroptosis improves biochemical function and prevents AO progression.
AO: Liver failure Outcome Resultant organ-level dysfunction from cumulative hepatocellular loss.

Evidence Assessment

Addressess the biological plausibility, empirical support, and quantitative understanding from each KER in an AOP. More help

1. MIE: Suppression of Keap1 cysteine oxidation → Nrf2 inhibition Biological Plausibility: Strong (Keap1–Cul3 represses Nrf2 when Keap1 Cys remain reduced). Empirical Support: Moderate–Strong (ARE-reporter/Nrf2 nuclear assays respond to redox manipulation; reversal by Nrf2 activators).

2. KE1: Nrf2 pathway inhibition (ARE targets down) Biological Plausibility: Strong (Nrf2 drives SLC7A11/GPX4/GCLC). Empirical Support: Strong (loss of these targets lowers GSH/NADPH and raises susceptibility to lipid peroxidation).

3. KE2: Lipid-peroxidation overload Biological Plausibility: Strong (PL-OOH accumulation with GPX4 shortfall). Empirical Support: Strong (BODIPY-C11↑; 4-HNE/MDA↑; rescued by ferrostatin-1/liproxstatin-1/DFO).

4. KE3: Hepatocyte ferroptosis Biological Plausibility: Strong (iron-dependent, GPX4-limited death). Empirical Support: Moderate–Strong (mode-specific rescue; histology/biochemistry improvements).

5. AO: Liver failure Biological Plausibility: Strong (massive hepatocellular loss impairs function). Empirical Support: Moderate (preclinical models; translational biomarkers align).

Known Modulating Factors

Modulating factors (MFs) may alter the shape of the response-response function that describes the quantitative relationship between two KES, thus having an impact on the progression of the pathway or the severity of the AO.The evidence supporting the influence of various modulating factors is assembled within the individual KERs. More help
 
Modulating Factor (MF) Influence or Outcome KER(s) involved
Labile iron pool (↑) Lowers threshold for KE2/KE3 KE2→KE3/KE4
Membrane PUFA / ACSL4 (↑) Amplifies lipid-peroxidation KE1→KE2
Baseline Nrf2 tone (low) Sensitizes to KE1 suppression MIE→KE1
NADPH supply (low, PPP defects) Worsens GSH regeneration KE1→KE2
Co-medications (DDI) Can depress Nrf2/thiol metabolism MIE→KE1; KE1→KE2
Age/comorbidities (NAFLD, hemochromatosis) Increase iron/oxidative load KE2→KE4; AO

Quantitative Understanding

Optional field to provide quantitative weight of evidence descriptors.  More help
Key Event / Relationship Quantitative Evidence Thresholds Temporal Concordance
MIE (Keap1 Cys oxidation suppressed) % decrease in Keap1 Cys oxidation vs Nrf2 nuclear levels ≥30–50% Nrf2 nuclear reduction impacts ARE output 0.5–2 h
KE1 (Nrf2 inhibited) Composite ARE score vs GSH/NADPH ≥30% drop in ARE score lowers GSH/NADPH 2–6 h
KE1→KE2 ARE score vs BODIPY-C11 & GPX4 activity GPX4 activity ≤70% + BODIPY-C11 ≥150% baseline predicts KE3 4–12 h
KE2→KE3 Lipid-ROS vs ferroptosis markers Lipid-ROS ≥200% baseline with iron-rescue sensitivity 6–24 h
KE3→AO Ferroptosis burden vs ALT/AST, INR Model-dependent; sustained KE3 correlates with INR ≥1.5 ≥24–72 h

Considerations for Potential Applications of the AOP (optional)

Addressess potential applications of an AOP to support regulatory decision-making.This may include, for example, possible utility for test guideline development or refinement, development of integrated testing and assessment approaches, development of (Q)SARs / or chemical profilers to facilitate the grouping of chemicals for subsequent read-across, screening level hazard assessments or even risk assessment. More help

This AOP supports screening and prioritization of redox-active chemicals, read-across for materials impacting the Keap1–Nrf2 axis, and risk mitigation in drug/formulation design by monitoring Nrf2–SLC7A11–GPX4 integrity and iron/lipid peroxidation loads. In DILI programs, composite KE2 metrics (BODIPY-C11↑ + GPX4↓ + LIP↑) can flag ferroptosis risk before overt injury, while Nrf2 activation or ferroptosis inhibitors serve as mechanistic countermeasures in exploratory studies.

References

List of the literature that was cited for this AOP. More help
  1. Cai et al., “A novel KEAP1 inhibitor, tiliroside, activates NRF2 to protect against acetaminophen-induced liver injury” (2025, PMC11868432)​

  2. Cai et al., “USP25 regulates KEAP1-NRF2 anti-oxidation axis and its inactivation protects acetaminophen-induced liver injury in male mice” (2023, Nature Comm)​

  3. Sato et al., “Sensor systems of KEAP1 uniquely detecting oxidative and electrophilic stresses in vivo” (2024, Science Direct)​

  4. Zhou et al., “The Nrf2 Pathway in Liver Diseases” (2022, Front Cell Dev Biol)​

  5. Bardallo et al., “Nrf2 and oxidative stress in liver ischemia/reperfusion injury” (2022, FEBS J)​

  6. Yang et al., “ELANE enhances KEAP1 protein stability and reduces Nrf2 activity, promoting MAFLD” (2025, Cell Death Disease)​

  7. Seedorf et al., “Selective disruption of NRF2-KEAP1 interaction leads to hepatoprotection” (2022, PMC9971056)​

  8. “KEAP1 retention in phase-separated p62 bodies drives pathological NRF2 activation and liver injury when autophagy is impaired” (2025, PMC12238652)​

  9. Zhou et al., “The role of Keap1-Nrf2 signaling pathway in the treatment of liver diseases” (2024, ScienceDirect)​

  10. “CH7450924, a KEAP1-NRF2 interaction inhibitor, suppresses inflammatory cytokine expression in the kidney and liver” (2025, Nature Sci Rep)​

  11. “Roles of the Keap1/Nrf2 pathway and mitophagy in liver diseases” (2025, PubMed 41116207)​

  12. Mohs et al., “Nrf2 target gene expression supplementation after Keap1 knockout in stress response” (2021, referenced in Front Cell Dev Biol)​

  13. Shin et al., “CDDO-Im prevents hepatic lipid accumulation via Nrf2 activation” (2009, referenced in Front Cell Dev Biol)​

  14. Sano et al., “Nrf2 activation in fatty liver disease model” (2021, referenced in Front Cell Dev Biol)​

  15. Yan et al., “Natural Nrf2 activators alleviate NAFLD by Keap1 regulation” (2018, referenced in Front Cell Dev Biol)​

  16. Shen et al., “Natural Nrf2 activators in NAFLD prevention” (2019, referenced in Front Cell Dev Biol)​

  17. Yang et al., “Ginkgolide B as Nrf2 activator protects liver” (2020, referenced in Front Cell Dev Biol)​

  18. Cuadrado et al., “Nrf2 activation as oncology preventive mechanism” (2019, referenced in Front Cell Dev Biol)​

  19. Villanueva et al., “Nrf2 role in viral hepatitis and NAFLD” (2019, referenced in Front Cell Dev Biol)​

  20. Taguchi et al., “Nrf2 activation protects from aflatoxin B1 hepatotoxicity” (2016, referenced in Front Cell Dev Bio)

  21. Takafumi Suzuki et al., "Molecular Mechanism of Cellular Oxidative Stress Sensing by Keap1"(2019, Cell reports)