This AOP is licensed under the BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.

AOP: 626

Title

A descriptive phrase which references both the Molecular Initiating Event and Adverse Outcome.It should take the form “MIE leading to AO”. For example, “Aromatase inhibition leading to reproductive dysfunction” where Aromatase inhibition is the MIE and reproductive dysfunction the AO. In cases where the MIE is unknown or undefined, the earliest known KE in the chain (i.e., furthest upstream) should be used in lieu of the MIE and it should be made clear that the stated event is a KE and not the MIE.  More help

Altered glucocorticoid receptor signaling leading to MASLD progression via reduced VLDL export-associated mitochondrial dysfunction

Short name
A name that succinctly summarises the information from the title. This name should not exceed 90 characters. More help
GR disruption leading to MASLD via lipogenesis-associated mitochondrial dysfunction
The current version of the Developer's Handbook will be automatically populated into the Handbook Version field when a new AOP page is created.Authors have the option to switch to a newer (but not older) Handbook version any time thereafter. More help
Handbook Version v2.7

Graphical Representation

A graphical representation of the AOP.This graphic should list all KEs in sequence, including the MIE (if known) and AO, and the pair-wise relationships (links or KERs) between those KEs. More help
Click to download graphical representation template Explore AOP in a Third Party Tool

Authors

The names and affiliations of the individual(s)/organisation(s) that created/developed the AOP. More help

You Song1, Jorke H. Kamstra2, Matej Oresic3,4

1 Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Økernveien 94, Oslo, Norway

2 Utrecht University, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht, the Netherlands

3 Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro, Sweden

4 University of Turku, Turku Bioscience Centre, Turku, Finland

Acknowledgement: This project was supported by the “Investigation of endocrine-disrupting chemicals as contributors to progression of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease” (EDC-MASLD) consortium funded by the Horizon Europe Program of the European Union (Grant Agreement 101136259). 

Point of Contact

The user responsible for managing the AOP entry in the AOP-KB and controlling write access to the page by defining the contributors as described in the next section.   More help

Contributors

Users with write access to the AOP page.  Entries in this field are controlled by the Point of Contact. More help
  • You Song

Coaches

This field is used to identify coaches who supported the development of the AOP.Each coach selected must be a registered author. More help
  • Shihori Tanabe

OECD Information Table

Provides users with information concerning how actively the AOP page is being developed and whether it is part of the OECD Workplan and has been reviewed and/or endorsed. OECD Project: Assigned upon acceptance onto OECD workplan. This project ID is managed and updated (if needed) by the OECD. OECD Status: For AOPs included on the OECD workplan, ‘OECD status’ tracks the level of review/endorsement of the AOP . This designation is managed and updated by the OECD. Journal-format Article: The OECD is developing co-operation with Scientific Journals for the review and publication of AOPs, via the signature of a Memorandum of Understanding. When the scientific review of an AOP is conducted by these Journals, the journal review panel will review the content of the Wiki. In addition, the Journal may ask the AOP authors to develop a separate manuscript (i.e. Journal Format Article) using a format determined by the Journal for Journal publication. In that case, the journal review panel will be required to review both the Wiki content and the Journal Format Article. The Journal will publish the AOP reviewed through the Journal Format Article. OECD iLibrary published version: OECD iLibrary is the online library of the OECD. The version of the AOP that is published there has been endorsed by the OECD. The purpose of publication on iLibrary is to provide a stable version over time, i.e. the version which has been reviewed and revised based on the outcome of the review. AOPs are viewed as living documents and may continue to evolve on the AOP-Wiki after their OECD endorsement and publication.   More help
OECD Project # OECD Status Reviewer's Reports Journal-format Article OECD iLibrary Published Version
Under Development
This AOP was last modified on February 12, 2026 07:41

Revision dates for related pages

Page Revision Date/Time
Increase, De novo lipogenesis February 10, 2026 04:39
Increase, Liver steatosis February 11, 2026 05:41
Increase, Hepatocellular lipotoxicity February 10, 2026 04:40
Increase, Mitochondrial dysfunction February 11, 2026 07:06
Increase, Oxidative Stress February 11, 2026 07:05
Increase, Cell injury/death May 27, 2024 07:23
Increase, Kupffer cell activation February 11, 2026 05:16
Increase, Steatohepatisis February 11, 2026 07:32
Increase, Transforming growth factor-beta signaling February 11, 2026 05:39
Increase, Collagen accumulation February 11, 2026 06:58
Increase, Liver fibrosis February 11, 2026 05:35
Increase, Cirrhosis February 11, 2026 07:34
Increase, Regenerative nodule formation February 10, 2026 06:47
Increase, Hepatic stellate cell activation February 11, 2026 07:04
Increase, Glucocorticoid receptor activation February 12, 2026 07:24
Increase, GR activation leads to Increase, De novo lipogenesis February 12, 2026 07:41
Increase, De novo lipogenesis leads to Increase, Liver steatosis February 11, 2026 05:41
Increase, Liver steatosis leads to Increase, Hepatocellular lipotoxicity February 10, 2026 08:59
Increase, Hepatocellular lipotoxicity leads to Increase, Mitochondrial dysfunction February 10, 2026 08:59
Increase, Mitochondrial dysfunction leads to Increase, Oxidative Stress November 09, 2017 04:09
Increase, Oxidative Stress leads to Cell injury/death February 07, 2020 09:32
Cell injury/death leads to Increase, Kupffer cell activation November 29, 2016 19:54
Increase, Kupffer cell activation leads to Increase, Steatohepatisis February 10, 2026 09:00
Increase, Steatohepatisis leads to Activation of TGF-β signaling February 10, 2026 09:00
Activation of TGF-β signaling leads to Increase, HSC activation February 10, 2026 09:01
Increase, HSC activation leads to Increase, Collagen accumulation December 05, 2018 08:51
Increase, Collagen accumulation leads to Increase, Liver fibrosis December 05, 2018 08:52
Increase, Liver fibrosis leads to Increase, Regenerative nodule formation February 10, 2026 09:02
Increase, Regenerative nodule formation leads to Increase, Cirrhosis February 10, 2026 09:02

Abstract

A concise and informative summation of the AOP under development that can stand-alone from the AOP page. The aim is to capture the highlights of the AOP and its potential scientific and regulatory relevance. More help

This adverse outcome pathway (AOP) describes a mechanistic sequence linking altered glucocorticoid receptor (GR) signaling to the progression of metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) through suppression of hepatic de novo lipogenesis (DNL) and subsequent mitochondrial dysfunction. Disruption of GR signaling reduces coordinated lipogenic and lipid-buffering pathways in hepatocytes, impairing the safe esterification and storage of fatty acids. This imbalance promotes hepatocellular lipotoxicity, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and hepatocyte injury, triggering inflammatory and fibrogenic responses. Activation of Kupffer cells, hepatic stellate cells, and TGF-β signaling drives extracellular matrix deposition and fibrotic remodeling, ultimately leading to steatohepatitis (MASH), fibrosis, and cirrhosis. This AOP provides a biologically plausible and complementary framework to support the identification and prioritization of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) that interfere with GR-regulated lipid homeostasis and contribute to MASLD progression.

AOP Development Strategy

Context

Used to provide background information for AOP reviewers and users that is considered helpful in understanding the biology underlying the AOP and the motivation for its development.The background should NOT provide an overview of the AOP, its KEs or KERs, which are captured in more detail below. More help

While increased de novo lipogenesis is commonly associated with hepatic steatosis, emerging evidence indicates that suppression of lipogenic pathways can also exacerbate liver injury by limiting the hepatocyte’s capacity to safely process and store fatty acids. De novo lipogenesis contributes not only to triglyceride synthesis but also to lipid remodeling and buffering processes that protect against lipotoxic species accumulation.

Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) signaling regulates key transcriptional programs involved in hepatic lipogenesis, fatty acid handling, and mitochondrial metabolism. Altered GR signaling—due to dysregulation or chemical interference—can reduce DNL, disrupt lipid homeostasis, and shift hepatocytes toward accumulation of toxic lipid intermediates. This AOP was developed to capture this less intuitive but mechanistically important route linking altered GR signaling to MASLD progression.

Strategy

Provides a description of the approaches to the identification, screening and quality assessment of the data relevant to identification of the key events and key event relationships included in the AOP or AOP network.This information is important as a basis to support the objective/envisaged application of the AOP by the regulatory community and to facilitate the reuse of its components.  Suggested content includes a rationale for and description of the scope and focus of the data search and identification strategy/ies including the nature of preliminary scoping and/or expert input, the overall literature screening strategy and more focused literature surveys to identify additional information (including e.g., key search terms, databases and time period searched, any tools used). More help

The AOP was developed through expert-driven pathway conceptualization supported by targeted literature evaluation in the areas of endocrine regulation, hepatic lipid metabolism, and chronic liver disease. Initial scoping identified reduced DNL as a plausible upstream disturbance capable of promoting hepatocellular lipotoxicity independent of increased lipid influx.

Focused literature searches were conducted to identify evidence supporting:

  • GR regulation of hepatic lipogenic gene networks

  • Consequences of suppressed DNL on lipid buffering and toxicity

  • Links between lipotoxicity, mitochondrial dysfunction, and oxidative stress

  • Inflammatory and fibrogenic signaling driving disease progression

Evidence from human clinical studies, animal models, and mechanistic in vitro systems was evaluated for biological plausibility, consistency, and relevance to regulatory toxicology, particularly in the context of chronic, low-dose chemical exposure.

Summary of the AOP

This section is for information that describes the overall AOP.The information described in section 1 is entered on the upper portion of an AOP page within the AOP-Wiki. This is where some background information may be provided, the structure of the AOP is described, and the KEs and KERs are listed. More help

Events:

Molecular Initiating Events (MIE)
An MIE is a specialised KE that represents the beginning (point of interaction between a prototypical stressor and the biological system) of an AOP. More help
Key Events (KE)
A measurable event within a specific biological level of organisation. More help
Adverse Outcomes (AO)
An AO is a specialized KE that represents the end (an adverse outcome of regulatory significance) of an AOP. More help
Type Event ID Title Short name
MIE 122 Increase, Glucocorticoid receptor activation Increase, GR activation
KE 1306 Increase, De novo lipogenesis Increase, De novo lipogenesis
KE 2405 Increase, Hepatocellular lipotoxicity Increase, Hepatocellular lipotoxicity
KE 177 Increase, Mitochondrial dysfunction Increase, Mitochondrial dysfunction
KE 1392 Increase, Oxidative Stress Increase, Oxidative Stress
KE 55 Increase, Cell injury/death Cell injury/death
KE 134 Increase, Kupffer cell activation Increase, Kupffer cell activation
KE 1271 Increase, Transforming growth factor-beta signaling Activation of TGF-β signaling
KE 265 Increase, Hepatic stellate cell activation Increase, HSC activation
KE 68 Increase, Collagen accumulation Increase, Collagen accumulation
KE 2406 Increase, Regenerative nodule formation Increase, Regenerative nodule formation
AO 459 Increase, Liver steatosis Increase, Liver steatosis
AO 1489 Increase, Steatohepatisis Increase, Steatohepatisis
AO 344 Increase, Liver fibrosis Increase, Liver fibrosis
AO 2407 Increase, Cirrhosis Increase, Cirrhosis

Relationships Between Two Key Events (Including MIEs and AOs)

This table summarizes all of the KERs of the AOP and is populated in the AOP-Wiki as KERs are added to the AOP.Each table entry acts as a link to the individual KER description page. More help

Network View

This network graphic is automatically generated based on the information provided in the MIE(s), KEs, AO(s), KERs and Weight of Evidence (WoE) summary tables. The width of the edges representing the KERs is determined by its WoE confidence level, with thicker lines representing higher degrees of confidence. This network view also shows which KEs are shared with other AOPs. More help

Prototypical Stressors

A structured data field that can be used to identify one or more “prototypical” stressors that act through this AOP. Prototypical stressors are stressors for which responses at multiple key events have been well documented. More help

Life Stage Applicability

The life stage for which the AOP is known to be applicable. More help

Taxonomic Applicability

Latin or common names of a species or broader taxonomic grouping (e.g., class, order, family) can be selected.In many cases, individual species identified in these structured fields will be those for which the strongest evidence used in constructing the AOP was available. More help
Term Scientific Term Evidence Link
human Homo sapiens NCBI
mouse Mus musculus NCBI
rat Rattus norvegicus NCBI

Sex Applicability

The sex for which the AOP is known to be applicable. More help

Overall Assessment of the AOP

Addressess the relevant biological domain of applicability (i.e., in terms of taxa, sex, life stage, etc.) and Weight of Evidence (WoE) for the overall AOP as a basis to consider appropriate regulatory application (e.g., priority setting, testing strategies or risk assessment). More help

This AOP is biologically plausible and supported by moderate to strong empirical evidence demonstrating that impaired lipogenic capacity can exacerbate lipotoxic stress and liver injury. The sequence of events reflects conserved cellular stress responses and fibrogenic mechanisms observed across mammalian species.

The AOP is particularly relevant for hazard identification and prioritization of chemicals that interfere with GR signaling and hepatic lipid homeostasis but may not induce classical steatogenic responses. While quantitative understanding across the full pathway is limited, the overall weight of evidence supports its inclusion within an AOP network describing GR-mediated MASLD progression.

Domain of Applicability

Addressess the relevant biological domain(s) of applicability in terms of sex, life-stage, taxa, and other aspects of biological context. More help
  • Taxa: Mammals (humans and laboratory rodents)

  • Life stage: Primarily adolescents and adults

  • Sex: Applicable to both sexes, with potential sex-dependent modulation of lipogenic responses

  • Biological context: Chronic endocrine perturbation, metabolic stress, or impaired lipid handling

This AOP is not intended to describe acute liver toxicity and is most applicable to chronic exposure scenarios.

Essentiality of the Key Events

The essentiality of KEs can only be assessed relative to the impact of manipulation of a given KE (e.g., experimentally blocking or exacerbating the event) on the downstream sequence of KEs defined for the AOP. Consequently, evidence supporting essentiality is assembled on the AOP page, rather than on the independent KE pages that are meant to stand-alone as modular units without reference to other KEs in the sequence. The nature of experimental evidence that is relevant to assessing essentiality relates to the impact on downstream KEs and the AO if upstream KEs are prevented or modified. This includes: Direct evidence: directly measured experimental support that blocking or preventing a KE prevents or impacts downstream KEs in the pathway in the expected fashion. Indirect evidence: evidence that modulation or attenuation in the magnitude of impact on a specific KE (increased effect or decreased effect) is associated with corresponding changes (increases or decreases) in the magnitude or frequency of one or more downstream KEs. More help

Evidence supporting the essentiality of the key events includes:

  • Altered GR signaling: Experimental manipulation of GR activity alters hepatic lipogenic programs and lipid handling capacity.

  • Reduced de novo lipogenesis: Suppression of DNL limits safe fatty acid esterification, increasing susceptibility to lipotoxic injury.

  • Hepatocellular lipotoxicity and mitochondrial dysfunction: Restoration of lipid buffering or mitochondrial function attenuates oxidative stress and cell injury.

  • Inflammatory and fibrogenic activation: Inhibition of Kupffer cell activation, hepatic stellate cell activation, or TGF-β signaling reduces fibrosis progression in experimental models.

These findings support the essential role of each KE in driving downstream MASLD outcomes.

Evidence Assessment

Addressess the biological plausibility, empirical support, and quantitative understanding from each KER in an AOP. More help

Across the KERs in this AOP:

  • Biological plausibility is strong, based on established roles of GR signaling and lipogenic pathways in hepatocyte homeostasis.

  • Empirical support is moderate, with increasing evidence linking reduced DNL to lipotoxicity and mitochondrial stress.

  • Quantitative understanding is limited to individual relationships, with few studies integrating effects across multiple downstream events.

Overall, the weight of evidence supports confidence in the pathway for regulatory-relevant applications.

Known Modulating Factors

Modulating factors (MFs) may alter the shape of the response-response function that describes the quantitative relationship between two KES, thus having an impact on the progression of the pathway or the severity of the AO.The evidence supporting the influence of various modulating factors is assembled within the individual KERs. More help
Modulating Factor (MF) Influence or Outcome KER(s) involved
Dietary fatty acid composition Modulates reliance on DNL for lipid buffering DNL ↓ → lipotoxicity
Insulin signaling status Influences lipogenic gene expression GR signaling → DNL
Mitochondrial capacity Alters susceptibility to oxidative stress Lipotoxicity → mitochondrial dysfunction
Inflammatory milieu Amplifies hepatocyte injury and fibrosis Oxidative stress → fibrosis

Quantitative Understanding

Optional field to provide quantitative weight of evidence descriptors.  More help

Quantitative data exist for individual steps linking reduced DNL to altered lipid profiles and hepatocellular stress. However, quantitative integration across mitochondrial, inflammatory, and fibrotic events is currently limited. This AOP is therefore best applied qualitatively or semi-quantitatively.

Considerations for Potential Applications of the AOP (optional)

Addressess potential applications of an AOP to support regulatory decision-making.This may include, for example, possible utility for test guideline development or refinement, development of integrated testing and assessment approaches, development of (Q)SARs / or chemical profilers to facilitate the grouping of chemicals for subsequent read-across, screening level hazard assessments or even risk assessment. More help

This AOP may support:

  • Identification of GR-modulating chemicals that disrupt hepatic lipid buffering

  • Complementary assessment of non-steatogenic mechanisms contributing to MASLD

  • Development of integrated testing strategies incorporating lipid handling and mitochondrial endpoints

  • AOP network construction capturing multiple GR-mediated routes to MASLD progression

References

List of the literature that was cited for this AOP. More help