Relationship: 2125: Reduction, Testosterone synthesis in Leydig cells leads to Decrease, testosterone levels

AOPs Referencing Relationship

Relationship: 2126: Decrease, testosterone levels leads to Decrease, DHT level

AOPs Referencing Relationship

Evidence Supporting Applicability of this Relationship

T and DHT are androgens present in all vertebrates. They play a role in development and fertility in both males and females (Ogino et al., 2011; Prizant et al., 2014; Rey, 2021; Swerdloff et al., 2017). All tissues expressing 5α-reductase are applicable to this KER (Azzouni et al., 2012).

Key Event Relationship Description

Testosterone (T) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) are androgens that are involved in numerous developmental and functional processes across animal taxa. In vertebrates, testosterone can be aromatized into estrogens catalyzed by the enzyme aromatase (CYP19) or be metabolized to DHT by the enzyme 5α-reductase (Azzouni et al., 2012; Naamneh Elzenaty et al., 2022; Swerdloff et al., 2017). Both T and DHT binds to the androgen receptor (AR), but with different affinities. DHT has a higher affinity for the AR than T. DHT also has a longer half-life and slower dissociation rate than T and cannot be aromatized into estrogens (Gerald & Raj, 2022; Naamneh Elzenaty et al., 2022; Swerdloff et al., 2017).

During mammalian development, T is primarily produced by the fetal testes and is needed for differentiation of the Wolffian ducts, the epididymis, and the ejaculatory duct. In pubertal and adult mammals, T is produced by the testes, the ovaries (although at a much lower level), and the adrenal glands (Ogino et al., 2011; Rey, 2021). In peripheral tissues (i.e. relative to the testes), DHT is converted from T by 5α-reductase to induce the differentiation of the urogenital sinus and genital tubercle to form the prostate, penis, scrotum and urethra (Swerdloff et al., 2017). Both androgens are essential for masculinization, sexual development, and fertility.

Evidence Supporting this KER

The biological plausibility for this KER is considered high

It is well established that DHT is synthesized from circulating T. 5α-reductase is the enzyme responsible for the conversion of T into DHT. Multiple isoforms of this enzyme are expressed in different tissues. Expression of 5α-reductase in peripheral tissues dictates where DHT will be formed from circulating T (Azzouni et al., 2012; Swerdloff et al., 2017).

Since T can be converted to DHT, it stands to reason that a lack of T can lead to a lack of DHT. Therefore, if there is a marked reduction in the availability of T, it can be surmised that DHT levels are consequently affected. However, to what extent T needs to be diminished in tissues before there is a functionally relevant decrease in DHT is largely unknown. In addition, the quantitative relationship between substrate (T) availability and levels of synthesized DHT is not well characterized in tissues in vivo. Notably, DHT can be produced via other steroid intermediates through the ‘backdoor pathway’ in mammals such as marsupials and humans (Renfree & Shaw 2023).

The empirical evidence for this KER is considered moderate

As per Table 1, empirical data exists for effects on both T and DHT following chemical exposures, but it is not always possible to deduce if the reduction in DHT is a direct consequence of reduced T or because of other mechanisms such as e.g. interference with 5α-reductase. However, some studies do include 5α-reductase mRNA expression or measure the ratio of T/DHT which if unchanged, indicates that the decrease would most likely be due to decrease in T availability.

Table 1

Dose concordance:

All the exposure data shown above indicates dose-concordance, since the same concentration tested affects both the upstream and downstream key event.

Other evidence

One study focused on the condition Leydig cell hypoplasia (LCH) in one patient. This patient had mutations in the LHCGR, and when measuring the levels of testosterone and DHT before and after hCG stimulation a decrease in both levels under the normal range were observed, even with hCG stimulation (Xu et al., 2018).

The levels of T do not always reflect the levels of DHT. T is also converted to estradiol (Naamneh Elzenaty et al., 2022). Therefore, the decrease in T may lead to a decrease in estradiol while DHT levels remain unchanged.  

Several studies have shown the existence of an alternative (‘backdoor’) pathway for DHT synthesis that is independent of T in marsupials and humans, but not in rodents (Marilyn B. Renfree et al., 1995). Instead of proceeding through the canonical pathway, progesterone or 17-OH progesterone, can be converted into allopregnanolone and 17OH-allopregnanolone. 17-OH allopregnanolone is then converted into androsterone leading to androstanediol that can finally be oxidized to produce DHT. Therefore, through this pathway, DHT can be synthesized without the presence of T (Auchus, 2004; Miller & Auchus, 2019).

Quantitative Understanding of the Linkage

The response-response relationship is not clearly established.

Different time scales have been observed in the studies above, the shortest one found being 48h. With Ibuprofen treatment, a decrease in both testosterone and DHT was observed after 48h in human fetal explant’s exposure media (Ben Maamar et al., 2017). However, it is not evident that this effect is direct and only due to a decrease in T.

Activity of 5α-reductase type 1 and 2: The activity of this enzyme determines how much T is converted into DHT. There are two isomers, with type 2 being the primary isomer expressed in DHT target organs. In deficiencies of this enzyme, there are studies that observe maintained DHT levels. This indicates that the type 1 enzyme can take over if needed (Azzouni et al., 2012).

Conversion of T to estradiol (E2): Aromatase can convert T into estrogens. The activity of this enzyme may push towards a decrease of T levels and an increase in estrogen levels without necessarily affecting DHT levels (Naamneh Elzenaty et al., 2022).

Hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis: Like most sex steroids, T production is controlled by the HPG axis during puberty and adulthood, but also during certain periods of development. For humans, the HPG axis is active following birth between 1-3 months in both males and females. Increase of LH and FSH are observed in infants up to 4-6months old. This stage is also known as the minipuberty (Lanciotti et al., 2018; Renault et al., 2020). Once GnRH is released from the hypothalamus, the pituitary gland secretes LH in pulses, which then stimulates the cells in the testes to produce T. A negative feedback loop can then occur, where testosterone then inhibits the release of GnRH and LH, in turn slowing down T production (Gerald & Raj, 2022; Naamneh Elzenaty et al., 2022; Nef & Parada, 2000).

References

Auchus, R. J. (2004). The backdoor pathway to dihydrotestosterone. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism, 15(9), 432–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2004.09.004

Azzouni, F., Godoy, A., Li, Y., & Mohler, J. (2012). The 5 Alpha-Reductase Isozyme Family: A Review of Basic Biology and Their Role in Human Diseases. Advances in Urology, 2012, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/530121

Ben Maamar, M., Lesné, L., Hennig, K., Desdoits-Lethimonier, C., Kilcoyne, K. R., Coiffec, I., Rolland, A. D., Chevrier, C., Kristensen, D. M., Lavoué, V., Antignac, J.-P., Le Bizec, B., Dejucq-Rainsford, N., Mitchell, R. T., Mazaud-Guittot, S., & Jégou, B. (2017). Ibuprofen results in alterations of human fetal testis development. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 44184. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44184

Culty, M., Thuillier, R., Li, W., Wang, Y., Martinez-Arguelles, D. B., Benjamin, C. G., Triantafilou, K. M., Zirkin, B. R., & Papadopoulos, V. (2008). In Utero Exposure to Di-(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate Exerts Both Short-Term and Long-Lasting Suppressive Effects on Testosterone Production in the Rat1. Biology of Reproduction, 78(6), 1018–1028. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.107.065649

Gerald, T., & Raj, G. (2022). Testosterone and the Androgen Receptor. Urologic Clinics of North America, 49(4), 603–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2022.07.004

Lanciotti, L., Cofini, M., Leonardi, A., Penta, L., & Esposito, S. (2018). Up-To-Date Review About Minipuberty and Overview on Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Gonadal Axis Activation in Fetal and Neonatal Life. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00410

Marilyn B. Renfree, Jenny L. Harry, & Geoffrey Shaw. (1995). The marsupial male: a role model for sexual development. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 350(1333), 243–251. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1995.0158

Marty, M. S., Crissman, J. W., & Carney, E. W. (2001). Evaluation of the Male Pubertal Assay’s Ability to Detect Thyroid Inhibitors and Dopaminergic Agents. Toxicological Sciences, 60(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/60.1.63

Miller, W. L., & Auchus, R. J. (2019). The “backdoor pathway” of androgen synthesis in human male sexual development. PLOS Biology, 17(4), e3000198. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000198

Moore, R. W., Potter, C. L., Theobald, H. M., Robinson, J. A., & Peterson, R. E. (1985). Androgenic deficiency in male rats treated with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 79(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-008X(85)90372-2

Naamneh Elzenaty, R., du Toit, T., & Flück, C. E. (2022). Basics of androgen synthesis and action. Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 36(4), 101665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2022.101665

Nef, S., & Parada, L. F. (2000). Hormones in male sexual development. Genes & Development, 14(24), 3075–3086. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.843800

Ogino, Y., Miyagawa, S., Katoh, H., Prins, G. S., Iguchi, T., & Yamada, G. (2011). Essential functions of androgen signaling emerged through the developmental analysis of vertebrate sex characteristics. Evolution & Development, 13(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-142X.2011.00482.x

Prizant, H., Gleicher, N., & Sen, A. (2014). Androgen actions in the ovary: balance is key. Journal of Endocrinology, 222(3), R141–R151. https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-14-0296

Renault, C. H., Aksglaede, L., Wøjdemann, D., Hansen, A. B., Jensen, R. B., & Juul, A. (2020). Minipuberty of human infancy – A window of opportunity to evaluate hypogonadism and differences of sex development? Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism, 25(2), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.6065/apem.2040094.047

Renfree, M., & Shaw G. (2023). The alternate pathway of androgen metabolism and window of sensitivity. Journal of Endocrinology, JOE-22-0296, https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-22-0296

Rey, R. A. (2021). The Role of Androgen Signaling in Male Sexual Development at Puberty. Endocrinology, 162(2). https://doi.org/10.1210/endocr/bqaa215

Swerdloff, R. S., Dudley, R. E., Page, S. T., Wang, C., & Salameh, W. A. (2017). Dihydrotestosterone: Biochemistry, Physiology, and Clinical Implications of Elevated Blood Levels. Endocrine Reviews, 38(3), 220–254. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2016-1067

Thibaut, R., & Porte, C. (2004). Effects of endocrine disrupters on sex steroid synthesis and metabolism pathways in fish. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 92(5), 485–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2004.10.008

Vierhapper, H., Nowotny, P., & Waldhäusl, W. (2003). Reduced production rates of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone in healthy men treated with rosiglitazone. Metabolism, 52(2), 230–232. https://doi.org/10.1053/meta.2003.50028

Xu, Y., Chen, Y., Li, N., Hu, X., Li, G., Ding, Y., Li, J., Shen, Y., Wang, X., & Wang, J. (2018). Novel compound heterozygous variants in the LHCGR gene identified in a subject with Leydig cell hypoplasia type 1. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, 31(2), 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpem-2016-0445

Relationship: 1935: Decrease, DHT level leads to Decrease, AR activation

AOPs Referencing Relationship

Evidence Supporting Applicability of this Relationship

Taxonomic applicability

KER1935 is assessed applicable to mammals, as DHT and AR activation are known to be related in mammals. It is, however, acknowledged that this KER most likely has a much broader domain of applicability extending to non-mammalian vertebrates. AOP developers are encouraged to add additional relevant knowledge to expand on the applicability to also include other vertebrates.

Sex applicability

KER1935 is assessed applicable to both sexes, as DHT activates AR in both males and females.

Life-stage applicability

KER1935 is considered applicable to developmental and adult life stages, as DHT-mediated AR activation is relevant from the AR is expressed.

Key Event Relationship Description

Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) is a primary ligand for the Androgen receptor (AR), a nuclear receptor and transcription factor. DHT is an endogenous sex hormone that is synthesized from e.g. testosterone by the enzyme 5α-reductase in different tissues and organs (Davey & Grossmann, 2016; Marks, 2004). In the absence of ligand (e.g. DHT) the AR is localized in the cytoplasm in complex with molecular chaperones. Upon ligand binding, AR is activated, translocated into the nucleus, and dimerizes to carry out its ‘genomic function’ (Davey & Grossmann, 2016). Hence, AR transcriptional function is directly dependent on the presence of ligands, with DHT being a more potent AR activator than testosterone (Grino et al, 1990). Reduced levels of DHT may thus lead to reduced AR activation. Besides its genomic actions, the AR can also mediate rapid, non-genomic second messenger signaling (Davey and Grossmann, 2016). Decreased DHT levels that lead to reduced AR activation can thus entail downstream effects on both genomic and non-genomic signaling.

Evidence Supporting this KER

The biological plausibility of KER1935 is considered high.

The activation of AR is dependent on binding of ligands (though a few cases of ligand-independent AR activation has been shown, see uncertainties and inconsistencies), primarily testosterone and DHT in mammals (Davey and Grossmann, 2016; Schuppe et al., 2020). Without ligand activation, the AR will remain in the cytoplasm associated with heat-shock and other chaperones and not be able to carry out its canonical (‘genomic’) function. Upon androgen binding, the AR undergoes a conformational change, chaperones dissociate, and a nuclear localization signal is exposed. The androgen/AR complex can now translocate to the nucleus, dimerize and bind AR response elements to regulate target gene expression (Davey and Grossmann, 2016; Eder et al., 2001). AR transcriptional activity and specificity is regulated by co-activators and co-repressors in a cell-specific manner (Heinlein and Chang, 2002).

The requirement for androgens binding to the AR for transcriptional activity has been extensively studied and proven and is generally considered textbook knowledge. The OECD test guideline no. 458 uses DHT as the reference chemical for testing androgen receptor activation in vitro (OECD, 2020). In the absence of DHT during development caused by 5α-reductase deficiency (i.e. still in the presence of testosterone) male fetuses fail to masculinize properly. This is evidenced by, for instance, individuals with congenital 5α-reductase deficiency conditions (Costa et al., 2012); conditions not limited to humans (Robitaille and Langlois, 2020), testifying to the importance of specifically DHT for AR activation and subsequent masculinization of certain reproductive tissues.

Binding of testosterone or DHT has differential effects in different tissues. E.g. in the developing mammalian male; testosterone is required for development of the internal sex organs (epididymis, vas deferens and the seminal vesicles), whereas DHT is crucial for development of the external sex organs (Keller et al., 1996; Robitaille and Langlois, 2020).

The empirical support for KER1935 is considered high.

Dose concordance:

• Increasing concentrations of DHT lead to increasing AR activation in vitro in AR reporter gene assays (OECD, 2020; Williams et al., 2017).

Indirect (supporting) evidence:

• In cell lines where proliferation can be induced by androgens (such as prostate cancer cells) proliferation can be used as a readout for AR-activation. Finasteride, a 5α-reductase inhibitor, dose-dependently decreases AR-mediated prostate cancer cell line proliferation (Bologna et al., 1995). 0.001 µM finasteride decreased the growth rate with 44%, 0.1 µM decreased the growth rate with 80%.
• Specific events of masculinization during development are dependent on AR activation by DHT, including the development and length of the perineum which can be measured as the anogenital distance (AGD, (Schwartz et al., 2019)). E.g. a dose-dependent effect of rat in utero exposure to the 5α-reductase inhibitor finasteride was observed on the length of the AGD, where 0.01 mg/kg bw/day finasteride reduced the AGD measured at pup day 1 by 8%, whereas 1 mg/kg bw/day reduced the AGD by 23% (Bowman et al., 2003).

Other evidence:

• Male individuals with congenital 5α-reductase deficiency (absence of DHT) fail to masculinize properly (Costa et al., 2012).
• A major driver of prostate cancer growth is AR activation (Davey and Grossmann, 2016; Huggins and Hodges, 1941). Androgen deprivation is used as treatment including 5α-reductase inhibitors to reduce DHT levels (Aggarwal et al., 2010).

Ligand-independent actions of the AR have been identified. To what extent and of which biological consequences is not well defined (Bennesch and Picard, 2015).

It should be noted, that in tissues, that are not DHT-dependent but rather respond to T, a decrease in DHT level may not influence AR activation significantly in that specific tissue.

Quantitative Understanding of the Linkage

There is a positive dose-response relationship between increasing concentrations of DHT and AR activation (Dalton et al., 1998; OECD, 2020). However, there is not enough data, or overview of the data, to define a quantitative linkage in vivo, and such a relationship will differ between biological systems (species, tissue, cell type).

Upon DHT binding to the AR, a conformational change that brings the amino (N) and carboxy (C) termini into close proximity occurs with a t_1/2 of approximately 3.5 minutes, around 6 minutes later the AR dimerizes as shown in transfected HeLa cells (Schaufele et al., 2005). Addition of 5 nM DHT to the culture medium of ‘AR-resistant’ transfected prostatic cancer cells resulted in a rapid (from 15 minutes, maximal at 30 minutes) nuclear translocation of the AR with minimal residual cytosolic expression (Nightingale et al., 2003). AR and promoter interactions occur within 15 minutes of ligand binding, and RNA polymerase II and coactivator recruitment are then proposed to occur transiently with cycles of approximately 90 minutes (Kang et al., 2002).

Androgens have been shown to upregulate and downregulate AR expression as well as 5α-reductase expression, but for 5α-reductase, each isoform in each tissue is differently regulated by androgens and can display sexual dimorphism (Lee and Chang, 2003; Robitaille and Langlois, 2020). The quantitative impact of such adaptive expression changes is unknown.

References

Aggarwal, S., Thareja, S., Verma, A., Bhardwaj, T.R., Kumar, M., 2010. An overview on 5α-reductase inhibitors. Steroids 75, 109–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2009.10.005

Bennesch, M.A., Picard, D., 2015. Minireview: Tipping the Balance: Ligand-Independent Activation of Steroid Receptors. Mol. Endocrinol. 29, 349–363. https://doi.org/10.1210/ME.2014-1315

Bhasin, S., Cunningham, G.R., Hayes, F.J., Matsumoto, A.M., Snyder, P.J., Swerdloff, R.S., Montori, V.M., 2010. Testosterone Therapy in Men with Androgen Deficiency Syndromes: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 95, 2536–2559. https://doi.org/10.1210/JC.2009-2354

Bologna, M., Muzi, P., Biordi, L., Festuccia, C., Vicentini, C., 1995. Finasteride dose-dependently reduces the proliferation rate of the LnCap human prostatic cancer cell line in vitro. Urology 45, 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(95)80019-0

Bowman, C.J., Barlow, N.J., Turner, K.J., Wallace, D.G., Foster, P.M.D., 2003. Effects of in Utero Exposure to Finasteride on Androgen-Dependent Reproductive Development in the Male Rat. Toxicol. Sci. 74, 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1093/TOXSCI/KFG128

Chamberlain, N.L., Driver, E.D., Miesfeld, R.L., 1994. The length and location of CAG trinucleotide repeats in the androgen receptor N-terminal domain affect transactivation function. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 3181. https://doi.org/10.1093/NAR/22.15.3181

Costa, E.F., Domenice, S., Sircili, M., Inacio, M., Mendonca, B., 2012. DSD due to 5α-reductase 2 deficiency - From diagnosis to long term outcome. Semin. Reprod. Med. 30, 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0032-1324727/ID/JR00766-20/BIB

Dalton, J.T., Mukherjee, A., Zhu, Z., Kirkovsky, L., Miller, D.D., 1998. Discovery of nonsteroidal androgens. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 244, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1998.8209

Davey, R.A., Grossmann, M., 2016. Androgen Receptor Structure, Function and Biology: From Bench to Bedside. Clin. Biochem. Rev. 37, 3–15.

Eder, I.E., Culig, Z., Putz, T., Nessler-Menardi, C., Bartsch, G., Klocker, H., 2001. Molecular Biology of the Androgen Receptor: From Molecular Understanding to the Clinic. Eur. Urol. 40, 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1159/000049782

Grino, P.B., Griffin, J.E., Wilson, J.D., 1990. Testosterone at High Concentrations Interacts with the Human Androgen Receptor Similarly to Dihydrotestosterone. Endocrinology 126, 1165–1172. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-126-2-1165

Heinlein, C.A., Chang, C., 2002. Androgen Receptor (AR) Coregulators: An Overview. Endocr. Rev. 23, 175–200. https://doi.org/10.1210/EDRV.23.2.0460

Huggins, C., Hodges, C. V., 1941. Studies on prostatic cancer: I. The effect of castration, of estrogen and of androgen injection on serum phosphatases in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer Res. 1, 293–297.

Kang, Z., Pirskanen, A., Jänne, O.A., Palvimo, J.J., 2002. Involvement of proteasome in the dynamic assembly of the androgen receptor transcription complex. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 48366–48371. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M209074200

Keller, E.T., Ershler, W.B., Chang, C., 1996. The androgen receptor: a mediator of diverse responses. Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed) 1, 59–71. https://doi.org/10.2741/A116

Krotkiewski, M., Kral, J.G., Karlsson, J., 1980. Effects of castration and testosterone substitution on body composition and muscle metabolism in rats. Acta Physiol. Scand. 109, 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1748-1716.1980.TB06592.X

Lee, D.K., Chang, C., 2003. Expression and Degradation of Androgen Receptor: Mechanism and Clinical Implication. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 88, 4043–4054. https://doi.org/10.1210/JC.2003-030261

Marks, L.S., 2004. 5Alpha-Reductase: History and Clinical Importance. Rev. Urol. 6 Suppl 9, S11-21.

Nightingale, J., Chaudhary, K.S., Abel, P.D., Stubbs, A.P., Romanska, H.M., Mitchell, S.E., Stamp, G.W.H., Lalani, E.N., 2003. Ligand Activation of the Androgen Receptor Downregulates E-Cadherin-Mediated Cell Adhesion and Promotes Apoptosis of Prostatic Cancer Cells. Neoplasia 5, 347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1476-5586(03)80028-3

OECD, 2020. Test No. 458: Stably Transfected Human Androgen Receptor Transcriptional Activation Assay for Detection of Androgenic Agonist and Antagonist Activity of Chemicals, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264264366-en

Robitaille, J., Langlois, V.S., 2020. Consequences of steroid-5α-reductase deficiency and inhibition in vertebrates. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2020.113400

Schaufele, F., Carbonell, X., Guerbadot, M., Borngraeber, S., Chapman, M.S., Ma, A.A.K., Miner, J.N., Diamond, M.I., 2005. The structural basis of androgen receptor activation: Intramolecular and intermolecular amino-carboxy interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 9802–9807. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408819102

Schuppe, E.R., Miles, M.C., Fuxjager, M.J., 2020. Evolution of the androgen receptor: Perspectives from human health to dancing birds. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 499, 110577. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MCE.2019.110577

Schwartz, C.L., Christiansen, S., Vinggaard, A.M., Axelstad, M., Hass, U., Svingen, T., 2019. Anogenital distance as a toxicological or clinical marker for fetal androgen action and risk for reproductive disorders. Arch. Toxicol. 93, 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-018-2350-5

Supakar, P.C., Song, C.S., Jung, M.H., Slomczynska, M.A., Kim, J.M., Vellanoweth, R.L., Chatterjee, B., Roy, A.K., 1993. A novel regulatory element associated with age-dependent expression of the rat androgen receptor gene. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 26400–26408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)74328-2

Tut, T.G., Ghadessy, F.J., Trifiro, M.A., Pinsky, L., Yong, E.L., 1997. Long Polyglutamine Tracts in the Androgen Receptor Are Associated with Reduced Trans-Activation, Impaired Sperm Production, and Male Infertility. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 82, 3777–3782. https://doi.org/10.1210/JCEM.82.11.4385

Williams, A.J., Grulke, C.M., Edwards, J., McEachran, A.D., Mansouri, K., Baker, N.C., Patlewicz, G., Shah, I., Wambaugh, J.F., Judson, R.S., Richard, A.M., 2017. The CompTox Chemistry Dashboard: a community data resource for environmental chemistry. J. Cheminform. 9, 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-017-0247-6

Wu, D., Lin, G., Gore, A.C., 2009. Age-related Changes in Hypothalamic Androgen Receptor and Estrogen Receptor α in Male Rats. J. Comp. Neurol. 512, 688. https://doi.org/10.1002/CNE.21925

Relationship: 2124: Decrease, AR activation leads to Altered, Transcription of genes by the AR

AOPs Referencing Relationship

Evidence Supporting Applicability of this Relationship

This KER is applicable for both sexes, across developmental stages into adulthood, in numerous cells and tissues and across mammalian taxa. It is, however, acknowledged that this KER most likely has a much broader domain of applicability extending to non-mammalian vertebrates. AOP developers are encouraged to add additional relevant knowledge to expand on the applicability to also include other vertebrates.

Key Event Relationship Description

The androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-dependent nuclear transcription factor that upon activation translocates to the nucleus, dimerizes, and binds androgen response elements (AREs) to modulate transcription of target genes (Lamont and Tindall, 2010, Roy et al. 2001). Decreased activation of the AR affects its transcription factor activity, therefore leading to altered AR-target gene expression. This KER refers to decreased AR activation and altered gene expression occurring in complex systems, such as in vivo and the specific effect on transcription of AR target genes will depend on species, life stage, tissue, cell type etc.

Evidence Supporting this KER

The biological plausibility for this KER is considered high

The AR is a ligand-activated transcription factor part of the steroid hormone nuclear receptor family. Non-activated AR is found in the cytoplasm as a multiprotein complex with heat-shock proteins, immunophilins and, other chaperones (Roy et al. 2001). Upon activation through ligand binding, the AR dissociates from the protein complex, translocates to the nucleus and homodimerizes. Facilitated by co-regulators, AR can bind to DNA regions containing AREs and initiate transcription of target genes, that thus will be different in e.g. different tissues, life-stages, species etc.

Through mapping of AREs and ChIP sequencing studies, several AR target genes have been identified, mainly studied in prostate cells (Jin, Kim, and Yu 2013). Different co-regulators and ligands lead to altered expression of different sets of genes (Jin et al. 2013; Kanno et al. 2022). Alternative splicing of the AR can lead to different AR variants that also affects which genes are transcribed (Jin et al. 2013).

Apart from this canonical signaling pathway, the AR can suppress gene expression, indirectly regulate miRNA transcription, and have non-genomic effects by rapid activation of second messenger pathways in either presence or absence of a ligand (Jin et al. 2013).

The empirical evidence for this KER is considered high

In humans, altered gene expression profiling in individuals with androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) can provide supporting empirical evidence (Holterhus et al. 2003; Peng et al. 2021). In rodent AR knockout (KO) models, gene expression profiling studies and gene-targeted approaches have provided information on differentially expressed genes in several organ systems including male and female reproductive, endocrine, muscular, cardiovascular and nervous systems (Denolet et al. 2006; Fan et al. 2005; Holterhus et al. 2003; Ikeda et al. 2005; Karlsson et al. 2016; MacLean et al. 2008; Rana et al. 2011; Russell et al. 2012; Shiina et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2006; Welsh et al. 2012; Willems et al. 2010; Yu et al. 2008, 2012; Zhang et al. 2006; Zhou et al. 2011).

Exposure to known antiandrogens has been shown to alter transcriptional profiles, for example of neonatal pig ovaries (Knapczyk-Stwora et al. 2019).

Dose concordance has also been observed for instance in zebrafish embryos; a dose of 50 µg/L of the AR antagonist flutamide resulted in 674 differentially expressed genes at 96 h post fertilization whereas 500 µg/L flutamide resulted in 2871 differentially expressed genes (Ayobahan et al., 2023).

AR action has been reported to occur also without ligand binding. However, not much is known about the extent and biological implications of such non-canonical, ligand-independent AR activation (Bennesch and Picard 2015).

Quantitative Understanding of the Linkage

There is not enough data to define a quantitative relationship between AR activation and alteration of AR target gene transcription, and such a relationship will differ between biological systems (species, tissue, cell type, life stage etc).

AR and promoter interactions occur within 15 minutes of ligand binding, RNA polymerase II and coactivator recruitment are proposed to occur transiently with cycles of approximately 90 minutes in LNCaP cells (Kang et al. 2002). RNA polymerase II elongation rates in mammalian cells have been shown to range between 1.3 and 4.3 kb/min (Maiuri et al. 2011). Therefore, depending on the cell type and the half-life of the AR target gene transcripts, changes are to be expected within hours.

AR has been hypothesized to auto-regulate its mRNA and protein levels (Mora and Mahesh 1999).

References

Ayobahan, S. U., Alvincz, J., Reinwald, H., Strompen, J., Salinas, G., Schäfers, C., et al. (2023). Comprehensive identification of gene expression fingerprints and biomarkers of sexual endocrine disruption in zebrafish embryo. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 250, 114514. doi:10.1016/J.ECOENV.2023.114514.

Bennesch, Marcela A., and Didier Picard. 2015. “Minireview: Tipping the Balance: Ligand-Independent Activation of Steroid Receptors.” Molecular Endocrinology 29(3):349–63.

Chamberlain, Nancy L., Erika D. Driverand, and Roger L. Miesfeldi. 1994. The Length and Location of CAG Trinucleotide Repeats in the Androgen Receptor N-Terminal Domain Affect Transactivation Function. Vol. 22.

Denolet, Evi, Karel De Gendt, Joke Allemeersch, Kristof Engelen, Kathleen Marchal, Paul Van Hummelen, Karen A. L. Tan, Richard M. Sharpe, Philippa T. K. Saunders, Johannes V. Swinnen, and Guido Verhoeven. 2006. “The Effect of a Sertoli Cell-Selective Knockout of the Androgen Receptor on Testicular Gene Expression in Prepubertal Mice.” Molecular Endocrinology 20(2):321–34. doi: 10.1210/me.2005-0113.

Fan, Wuqiang, Toshihiko Yanase, Masatoshi Nomura, Taijiro Okabe, Kiminobu Goto, Takashi Sato, Hirotaka Kawano, Shigeaki Kato, and Hajime Nawata. 2005. Androgen Receptor Null Male Mice Develop Late-Onset Obesity Caused by Decreased Energy Expenditure and Lipolytic Activity but Show Normal Insulin Sensitivity With High Adiponectin Secretion. Vol. 54.

Holterhus, Paul-Martin, Olaf Hiort, Janos Demeter, Patrick O. Brown, and James D. Brooks. 2003. Differential Gene-Expression Patterns in Genital Fibroblasts of Normal Males and 46,XY Females with Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome: Evidence for Early Programming Involving the Androgen Receptor. Vol. 4.

Ikeda, Yasumasa, Ken Ichi Aihara, Takashi Sato, Masashi Akaike, Masanori Yoshizumi, Yuki Suzaki, Yuki Izawa, Mitsunori Fujimura, Shunji Hashizume, Midori Kato, Shusuke Yagi, Toshiaki Tamaki, Hirotaka Kawano, Takahiro Matsumoto, Hiroyuki Azuma, Shigeaki Kato, and Toshio Matsumoto. 2005. “Androgen Receptor Gene Knockout Male Mice Exhibit Impaired Cardiac Growth and Exacerbation of Angiotensin II-Induced Cardiac Fibrosis.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 280(33):29661–66. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411694200.

Jin, Hong Jian, Jung Kim, and Jindan Yu. 2013. “Androgen Receptor Genomic Regulation.” Translational Andrology and Urology 2(3):158–77.

Kang, Zhigang, Asta Pirskanen, Olli A. Jänne, and Jorma J. Palvimo. 2002. “Involvement of Proteasome in the Dynamic Assembly of the Androgen Receptor Transcription Complex.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 277(50):48366–71. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209074200.

Kanno, Yuichiro, Nao Saito, Ryota Saito, Tomohiro Kosuge, Ryota Shizu, Tomofumi Yatsu, Takuomi Hosaka, Kiyomitsu Nemoto, Keisuke Kato, and Kouichi Yoshinari. 2022. “Differential DNA-Binding and Cofactor Recruitment Are Possible Determinants of the Synthetic Steroid YK11-Dependent Gene Expression by Androgen Receptor in Breast Cancer MDA-MB 453 Cells.” Experimental Cell Research 419(2). doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2022.113333.

Karlsson, Sara A., Erik Studer, Petronella Kettunen, and Lars Westberg. 2016. “Neural Androgen Receptors Modulate Gene Expression and Social Recognition but Not Social Investigation.” Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 10(MAR). doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00041.

Knapczyk-Stwora, Katarzyna, Anna Nynca, Renata E. Ciereszko, Lukasz Paukszto, Jan P. Jastrzebski, Elzbieta Czaja, Patrycja Witek, Marek Koziorowski, and Maria Slomczynska. 2019. “Flutamide-Induced Alterations in Transcriptional Profiling of Neonatal Porcine Ovaries.” Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 10(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/s40104-019-0340-y.

Lamont, K. R., and Tindall, D. J. (2010). Androgen Regulation of Gene Expression. Adv. Cancer Res. 107, 137–162. doi:10.1016/S0065-230X(10)07005-3.

MacLean, Helen E., W. S. Maria Chiu, Amanda J. Notini, Anna-Maree Axell, Rachel A. Davey, Julie F. McManus, Cathy Ma, David R. Plant, Gordon S. Lynch, and Jeffrey D. Zajac. 2008. “ Impaired Skeletal Muscle Development and Function in Male, but Not Female, Genomic Androgen Receptor Knockout Mice .” The FASEB Journal 22(8):2676–89. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-105726.

Maiuri, Paolo, Anna Knezevich, Alex De Marco, Davide Mazza, Anna Kula, Jim G. McNally, and Alessandro Marcello. 2011. “Fast Transcription Rates of RNA Polymerase II in Human Cells.” EMBO Reports 12(12):1280–85. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.196.

Mora, Gloria R., and Virendra B. Mahesh. 1999. Autoregulation of the Androgen Receptor at the Translational Level: Testosterone Induces Accumulation of Androgen Receptor MRNA in the Rat Ventral Prostate Polyribosomes.

Peng, Yajie, Hui Zhu, Bing Han, Yue Xu, Xuemeng Liu, Huaidong Song, and Jie Qiao. 2021. “Identification of Potential Genes in Pathogenesis and Diagnostic Value Analysis of Partial Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome Using Bioinformatics Analysis.” Frontiers in Endocrinology 12. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.731107.

Rana, Kesha, Barbara C. Fam, Michele V Clarke, Tammy P. S. Pang, Jeffrey D. Zajac, and Helen E. Maclean. 2011. “Increased Adiposity in DNA Binding-Dependent Androgen Receptor Knockout Male Mice Associated with Decreased Voluntary Activity and Not Insulin Resistance.” Am J Physiol Endocrinol Me-Tab 301:767–78. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00584.2010.-In.

Roy, Arun K., Rakesh K. Tyagi, Chung S. Song, Yan Lavrovsky, Soon C. Ahn, Tae Sung Oh, and Bandana Chatterjee. 2001. “Androgen Receptor: Structural Domains and Functional Dynamics after Ligand-Receptor Interaction.” Pp. 44–57 in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Vol. 949. New York Academy of Sciences.

Russell, Patricia K., Michele V. Clarke, Jarrod P. Skinner, Tammy P. S. Pang, Jeffrey D. Zajac, and Rachel A. Davey. 2012. “Identification of Gene Pathways Altered by Deletion of the Androgen Receptor Specifically in Mineralizing Osteoblasts and Osteocytes in Mice.” Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 49(1):1–10. doi: 10.1530/JME-12-0014.

Shiina, Hiroko, Takahiro Matsumoto, Takashi Sato, Katsuhide Igarashi, Junko Miyamoto, Sayuri Takemasa, Matomo Sakari, Ichiro Takada, Takashi Nakamura, Daniel Metzger, Pierre Chambon, Jun Kanno, Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, and Shigeaki Kato. 2006. Premature Ovarian Failure in Androgen Receptor-Deficient Mice. Vol. 103.

Supakar, P. C., C. S. Song, M. H. Jung, M. A. Slomczynska, J. M. Kim, R. L. Vellanoweth, B. Chatterjee, and A. K. Roy. 1993. “A Novel Regulatory Element Associated with Age-Dependent Expression of the Rat Androgen Receptor Gene.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 268(35):26400–408. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)74328-2.

Tut, Thein G., Farid J. Ghadessy, M. A. Trifiro, L. Pinsky, and E. L. Yong. 1997. Long Polyglutamine Tracts in the Androgen Receptor Are Associated with Reduced Trans-Activation, Impaired Sperm Production, and Male Infertility*. Vol. 82.

Wang, Ruey Sheng, Shuyuan Yeh, Lu Min Chen, Hung Yun Lin, Caixia Zhang, Jing Ni, Cheng Chia Wu, P. Anthony Di Sant’Agnese, Karen L. DeMesy-Bentley, Chii Ruey Tzeng, and Chawnshang Chang. 2006. “Androgen Receptor in Sertoli Cell Is Essential for Germ Cell Nursery and Junctional Complex Formation in Mouse Testes.” Endocrinology 147(12):5624–33. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-0138.

Welsh, M., L. Moffat, K. Belling, L. R. de França, T. M. Segatelli, P. T. K. Saunders, R. M. Sharpe, and L. B. Smith. 2012. “Androgen Receptor Signalling in Peritubular Myoid Cells Is Essential for Normal Differentiation and Function of Adult Leydig Cells.” International Journal of Andrology 35(1):25–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2011.01150.x.

Willems, Ariane, Sergio R. Batlouni, Arantza Esnal, Johannes V. Swinnen, Philippa T. K. Saunders, Richard M. Sharpe, Luiz R. França, Karel de Gendt, and Guido Verhoeven. 2010. “Selective Ablation of the Androgen Receptor in Mouse Sertoli Cells Affects Sertoli Cell Maturation, Barrier Formation and Cytoskeletal Development.” PLoS ONE 5(11). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014168.

Wu, D. I., Grace Lin, and Andrea C. Gore. 2009. “Age-Related Changes in Hypothalamic Androgen Receptor and Estrogen Receptor in Male Rats.” The Journal of Comparative Neurology 512:688–701. doi: 10.1002/cne.21925.

Yu, I. Chen, Hung Yun Lin, Ning Chun Liu, Ruey Shen Wang, Janet D. Sparks, Shuyuan Yeh, and Chawnshang Chang. 2008. “Hyperleptinemia without Obesity in Male Mice Lacking Androgen Receptor in Adipose Tissue.” Endocrinology 149(5):2361–68. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-0516.

Yu, Shengqiang, Chiuan Ren Yeh, Yuanjie Niu, Hong Chiang Chang, Yu Chieh Tsai, Harold L. Moses, Chih Rong Shyr, Chawnshang Chang, and Shuyuan Yeh. 2012. “Altered Prostate Epithelial Development in Mice Lacking the Androgen Receptor in Stromal Fibroblasts.” Prostate 72(4):437–49. doi: 10.1002/pros.21445.

Zhang, Caixia, Shuyuan Yeh, Yen-Ta Chen, Cheng-Chia Wu, Kuang-Hsiang Chuang, Hung-Yun Lin, Ruey-Sheng Wang, Yu-Jia Chang, Chamindrani Mendis-Handagama, Liquan Hu, Henry Lardy, Chawnshang Chang, and † † George. 2006. Oligozoospermia with Normal Fertility in Male Mice Lacking the Androgen Receptor in Testis Peritubular Myoid Cells.

Zhou, Wei, Gensheng Wang, Christopher L. Small, Zhilin Liu, Connie C. Weng, Lizhong Yang, Michael D. Griswold, and Marvin L. Meistrich. 2011. “Erratum: Gene Expression Alterations by Conditional Knockout of Androgen Receptor in Adult Sertoli Cells of Utp14bjsd/Jsd (Jsd) Mice (Biology of Reproduction (2010) 83, (759-766) DOI: 10.1095/Biolreprod.110.085472).” Biology of Reproduction 84(2):400–408.

Relationship: 2127: Altered, Transcription of genes by the AR leads to AGD, decreased

AOPs Referencing Relationship

Relationship: 2131: Decrease, testosterone levels leads to Decrease, AR activation

AOPs Referencing Relationship

Evidence Supporting Applicability of this Relationship

Taxonomic applicability

KER2131 is assessed applicable to mammals, as T and AR activation are known to be related in mammals. It is, however, acknowledged that this KER most likely has a much broader domain of applicability extending to non-mammalian vertebrates. AOP developers are encouraged to add additional relevant knowledge to expand on the applicability to also include other vertebrates.

Sex applicability

KER2131 is assessed applicable to both sexes, as T activates AR in both males and females.

Life-stage applicability

KER2131 is considered applicable to developmental and adult life stages, as T-mediated AR activation is relevant from the AR is expressed.

Key Event Relationship Description

This key event relationship links decreased testosterone (T) levels to decreased androgen receptor (AR) activation. T is an endogenous steroid hormone important for, amongst other things, reproductive organ development and growth as well as muscle mass and spermatogenesis (Marks, 2004).T is, together with dihydrotestosterone (DHT), a primary ligand for the AR in mammals (Schuppe et al., 2020). Besides its genomic actions, the AR can also mediate rapid, non-genomic second messenger signaling (Davey & Grossmann, 2016). When T levels are reduced, less substrate is available for the AR, and hence, AR activation is decreased (Gao et al., 2005).

Evidence Supporting this KER

The biological plausibility for this KER is considered high

AR activation is dependent on ligand binding (though a few cases of ligand-independent AR activation has been shown, see uncertainties and inconsistencies). T is a primary ligand for the AR, and when T levels are decreased there is less substrate for the AR, and hence, AR activation is decreased. In the male, T is primarily synthesized by the testes, and in some target tissues T is irreversibly metabolized to the more potent metabolite DHT. T and DHT both bind to the AR, but DHT has a higher binding affinity (Gao et al., 2005). The lower binding affinity of T compared to DHT is due to the faster dissociation rate of T from the full-length AR, as T has less effective FXXLF motif binding to AF2 (Askew et al., 2007). Binding of T or DHT has different effects in different tissues. E.g. in the developing male, T is required for development of the internal sex organs (epididymis, vas deferens and the seminal vesicles), whereas DHT is crucial for development of the external sex organs (Keller et al., 1996). In the adult male, androgen action in the reproductive tissues is DHT dependent, whereas action in muscle and bone is DHT independent (Gao et al., 2005). In patients with male androgen deficiency syndrome (AIS), clinically low levels of T leads to reduced AR activation (either due to low T or DHT in target tissue), which manifests as both androgenic related symptoms (such as incomplete or delayed sexual development, loss of body hair, small or shrinking testes, low or zero sperm count) as well as anabolic related symptoms (such as height loss, low trauma fracture, low bone mineral density, reduced muscle bulk and strength, increased body fat). All symptoms can be counteracted by treatment with T, which acts directly on the AR receptor in anabolic tissue (Bhasin et al., 2010). Similarly, removal of the testicles in weanling rats results in a feminized body composition and muscle metabolism, which is reversed by administration of T (Krotkiewski et al., 1980). As this demonstrates, the consequences of low T regarding AR activation will depend on tissue, life stage, species etc.

The empirical evidence for this KER is considered high

Dose concordance

There is a positive dose-response relationship between increasing concentrations of T and AR activation (U.S. EPA., 2023).

Other evidence

• In male patients with androgen deficiency, treatment with T counteracts anabolic (DHT independent) related symptoms such as height loss, low trauma fracture, low bone mineral density, reduced muscle bulk and strength, increased body fat (Bhasin et al., 2010; Katznelson et al., 1996).
• Removal of the testicles in weanling rats result in a feminized body composition and muscle metabolism, which is reversed by administration of T (Krotkiewski et al., 1980).

Ligand-independent actions of the AR have been identified. To what extent and of which biological significance is not well defined (Bennesch & Picard, 2015).

Quantitative Understanding of the Linkage

There is a positive dose-response relationship between increasing concentrations of T and AR activation (U.S. EPA., 2023). However, there is not enough data, or overview of the data, to define a quantitative linkage in vivo, and such a relationship will differ between biological systems (species, tissue, cell type).

AR and promoter interactions occur within 15 minutes of ligand binding, and RNA polymerase II and coactivator recruitment are then proposed to occur transiently with cycles of approximately 90 minutes (Kang et al., 2002).

Androgens can upregulate and downregulate AR expression (Lee & Chang, 2003).

References

Askew, E. B., Gampe, R. T., Stanley, T. B., Faggart, J. L., & Wilson, E. M. (2007). Modulation of Androgen Receptor Activation Function 2 by Testosterone and Dihydrotestosterone. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 282(35), 25801–25816. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M703268200

Bennesch, M. A., & Picard, D. (2015). Minireview: Tipping the Balance: Ligand-Independent Activation of Steroid Receptors. Molecular Endocrinology, 29(3), 349–363. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2014-1315

Bhasin, S., Cunningham, G. R., Hayes, F. J., Matsumoto, A. M., Snyder, P. J., Swerdloff, R. S., & Montori, V. M. (2010). Testosterone Therapy in Men with Androgen Deficiency Syndromes: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 95(6), 2536–2559. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-2354

Davey, R. A., & Grossmann, M. (2016). Androgen Receptor Structure, Function and Biology: From Bench to Bedside. The Clinical Biochemist. Reviews, 37(1), 3–15. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27057074

Gao, W., Bohl, C. E., & Dalton, J. T. (2005). Chemistry and Structural Biology of Androgen Receptor. Chemical Reviews, 105(9), 3352–3370. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020456u

Kang, Z., Pirskanen, A., Jänne, O. A., & Palvimo, J. J. (2002). Involvement of Proteasome in the Dynamic Assembly of the Androgen Receptor Transcription Complex. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 277(50), 48366–48371. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M209074200

Katznelson, L., Finkelstein, J. S., Schoenfeld, D. A., Rosenthal, D. I., Anderson, E. J., & Klibanski, A. (1996). Increase in bone density and lean body mass during testosterone administration in men with acquired hypogonadism. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 81(12), 4358–4365. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.81.12.8954042

Keller, E. T., Ershler, W. B., & Chang, Chawnshang. (1996). The androgen receptor: A mediator of diverse responses. Frontiers in Bioscience, 1(4), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.2741/A116

Krotkiewski, M., Kral, J. G., & Karlsson, J. (1980). Effects of castration and testosterone substitution on body composition and muscle metabolism in rats. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 109(3), 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1980.tb06592.x

Lee, D. K., & Chang, C. (2003). Expression and Degradation of Androgen Receptor: Mechanism and Clinical Implication. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 88(9), 4043–4054. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2003-030261

Marks, L. S. (2004). 5alpha-reductase: history and clinical importance. Reviews in Urology, 6 Suppl 9(Suppl 9), S11-21. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16985920

Schuppe, E. R., Miles, M. C., and Fuxjager, M. J. (2020). Evolution of the androgen receptor: Perspectives from human health to dancing birds. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 499, 110577. doi:10.1016/J.MCE.2019.110577.

U.S. EPA. (2023). ToxCast & Tox21 AR agonism of testosterone. Retrieved from Https://Www.Epa.Gov/Chemical-Research/Toxicity-Forecaster-Toxcasttm-Data June 23, 2023. Data Released October 2018.

Relationship: 2820: Decrease, AR activation leads to AGD, decreased

AOPs Referencing Relationship