Relationship: 2130: Antagonism, Androgen receptor leads to Decrease, AR activation

AOPs Referencing Relationship

Evidence Supporting Applicability of this Relationship

This KER is applicable to mammals as AR expression and activity is highly conserved (Davey & Grossmann, 2016). AR activity is important for sexual development and reproduction in both males and females (Prizant et al., 2014; Walters et al., 2010). AR function is required during development, puberty, and adulthood. It is, however, acknowledged that this KER most likely has a much broader domain of applicability extending to non-mammalian vertebrates. AOP developers are encouraged to add additional relevant knowledge to expand on the applicability to also include other vertebrates.

Key Event Relationship Description

The androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-activated steroid hormone nuclear receptor (Davey & Grossmann, 2016). In its inactive state, the AR locates to the cytoplasm (Roy et al., 2001). When activated, the AR translocates to the nucleus, dimerizes, and, together with co-regulators, binds to specific DNA regulatory sequences to regulate gene transcription (Davey & Grossmann, 2016) (Lamont and Tindall, 2010). This is considered the canonical AR signaling pathway. The AR can also activate non-genomic signalling (Jin et al., 2013). However, this KER focuses on the canonical pathway.

The two main AR ligands are the androgens testosterone (T) and the more potent dihydrotestosterone (DHT). Androgens bind to the AR to mediate downstream androgenic responses, such as male development and masculinization (Rey, 2021; Walters et al., 2010). Antagonism of the AR would decrease AR activation and therefore the downstream AR-mediated effects.  

Evidence Supporting this KER

The biological plausibility for this KER is considered high.

The AR belongs to the steroid hormone nuclear receptor family. The AR has 3 main domains essential for its activity, the N-terminal domain, the ligand binding domain, and the DNA binding domain (Roy et al., 2001). Ligands, such as T and DHT, must bind to the ligand binding domain to activate AR allowing it to fulfill its role as a transcription factor. The binding of the ligand induces a change in AR conformation allowing it to translocate to the nucleus and congregate into a subnuclear compartment (Marcelli et al., 2006; Roy et al., 2001) homodimerize and bind to the DNA target sequences and regulate transcription of target genes. Regulation of AR target genes is greatly facilitated by numerous co-factors. Active AR signaling is essential for male reproduction and sexual development and is also crucial in several other tissues and organs such as ovaries, the immune system, bones, and muscles (Ogino et al., 2011; Prizant et al., 2014; Rey, 2021; William H. Walker, 2021).

AR antagonists can compete with or prevent in different ways  AR ligand binding, thereby preventing AR activation. Antagonism of the AR can prevent translocation to the nucleus, compartmentalization, dimerization and DNA binding. Consequently, AR cannot regulate transcription of target genes and androgen signalling is disrupted. This can be observed using different AR activation assays such as AR dimerization, translocation, DNA binding or transcriptional activity assays (Brown et al., 2023; OECD, 2020).

The empirical evidence for this KER is considered high

The effects of AR antagonism have been shown in many studies in vivo and in vitro.

Several stressors can act as antagonists of the AR and lead to decreased AR activation. Some of these are detailed in an AOP key event relationship report by (Pedersen et al., 2022) and shown below, exhibiting evidence of dose-concordance:

Stressors

• Cyproterone acetate: Using the AR-CALUX reporter assay in antagonism mode, cyproterone acetate showed an IC50 of 7.1 nM (Sonneveld, 2005)
• Epoxiconazole: Using transiently AR-transfected CHO cells, epoxiconazole showed a LOEC of 1.6 µM and an IC50 of 10 µM (Kjærstad et al., 2010).
• Flutamide: Using the AR-CALUX reporter assay in antagonism mode, flutamide showed an IC50 of 1.3 µM (Sonneveld, 2005).
• Flusilazole: Using hAR-EcoScreen Assay, triticonazole showed a LOEC for antagonisms of 0.8 µM and an IC50 of 2.8 (±0.1) µM (Draskau et al., 2019).
• Prochloraz: Using transiently AR-transfected CHO cells, prochloraz showed a LOEC of 6.3 µM and an IC50 of 13 µM (Kjærstad et al., 2010).
• Propiconazole: Using transiently AR-transfected CHO cells, propiconazole showed a LOEC of 12.5 µM and an IC50 of 18 µM (Kjærstad et al., 2010).
• Tebuconazole: Using transiently AR-transfected CHO cells, tebuconazole showed a LOEC of 3.1 µM and an IC50 of 8.1 µM (Kjærstad et al., 2010).
• Triticonazole: Using hAR-EcoScreen Assay, triticonazole showed a LOEC for antagonisms of 0.2 µM and an IC50 of 0.3 (±0.01) µM (Draskau et al., 2019).
• Vinclozolin: Using the AR-CALUX reporter assay in antagonism mode, vinclozolin showed an IC50of 1.0 µM(Sonneveld, 2005).”(Pedersen et al., 2022)

Other evidence:

Known AR antagonists are used for treatment of AR-sensitive cancers such as flutamide for prostate cancer (Mahler et al., 1998).

Known antiandrogenic compounds like hydroxyflutamide have been shown to act as agonists when the AR carries certain mutations, therefore contributing to uncertainties (Yeh et al., 1997). Additionally, the levels of endogenous androgens (e.g., testosterone or dihydrotestosterone) and the variability in the presence and function of AR co-activators may modulate the effect of AR antagonism.

Quantitative Understanding of the Linkage

 The quantitative relationship between AR antagonism and AR activation will depend on the type of antagonist.

Nuclear translocation in HeLa cells transfected with AR-GFP show a response within 2 hours after ligand exposure (Marcelli et al., 2006; Szafran et al., 2008). Another assay focusing on AR binding to promoters in LNCaP cells has shown that after ligand binding, AR is able to translocate and bind to the DNA sequences within 15min showing the speed of AR activation (Kang et al., 2002).

AR antagonism can lead to increased AR transcript stability and levels as a compensatory mechanism in prostate cancer cells (Dart et al., 2020). In turn, in presence of increased AR levels, AR antagonists can exhibit agonistic activity (Chen et al., 2003).

References

Brown, E. C., Hallinger, D. R., Simmons, S. O., Puig-Castellví, F., Eilebrecht, E., Arnold, L., & Bioscience, P. A. (2023). High-throughput AR dimerization assay identifies androgen disrupting chemicals and metabolites. Front. Toxicol, 5, 1134783. https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2023.1134783

Chen, C. D., Welsbie, D. S., Tran, C., Baek, S. H., Chen, R., Vessella, R., Rosenfeld, M. G., & Sawyers, C. L. (2003). A R T I C L E S Molecular determinants of resistance to antiandrogen therapy. NATURE MEDICINE, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm972

Dart, D. A., Ashelford, K., & Jiang, W. G. (2020). AR mRNA stability is increased with AR-antagonist resistance via 3′UTR variants. https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-19-0340

Davey, R. A., & Grossmann, M. (2016). Androgen Receptor Structure, Function and Biology: From Bench to Bedside. In Androgen Receptor Biology Clin Biochem Rev (Vol. 37, Issue 1).

Draskau, M. K., Boberg, J., Taxvig, C., Pedersen, M., Frandsen, H. L., Christiansen, S., & Svingen, T. (2019). In vitro and in vivo endocrine disrupting effects of the azole fungicides triticonazole and flusilazole. Environmental Pollution, 255, 113309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113309

Jin, H. J., Kim, J., & Yu, J. (2013). Androgen receptor genomic regulation. In Translational Andrology and Urology (Vol. 2, Issue 3, pp. 158–177). AME Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2013.09.01

Kang, Z., Pirskanen, A., Jänne, O. A., & Palvimo, J. J. (2002). Involvement of Proteasome in the Dynamic Assembly of the Androgen Receptor Transcription Complex. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 277(50), 48366–48371. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M209074200

Kjærstad, M. B., Taxvig, C., Nellemann, C., Vinggaard, A. M., & Andersen, H. R. (2010). Endocrine disrupting effects in vitro of conazole antifungals used as pesticides and pharmaceuticals. Reproductive Toxicology, 30(4), 573–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2010.07.009

Lamont, K. R., and Tindall, D. J. (2010). Androgen Regulation of Gene Expression. Adv. Cancer Res. 107, 137–162. doi:10.1016/S0065-230X(10)07005-3.

Mahler, C., Verhelst, J., and Denis, L. (1998). Clinical pharmacokinetics of the antiandrogens and their efficacy in prostate cancer. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 34, 405–417. doi:10.2165/00003088-199834050-00005/METRICS.

Marcelli, M., Stenoien, D. L., Szafran, A. T., Simeoni, S., Agoulnik, I. U., Weigel, N. L., Moran, T., Mikic, I., Price, J. H., & Mancini, M. A. (2006). Quantifying effects of ligands on androgen receptor nuclear translocation, intranuclear dynamics, and solubility. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 98(4), 770–788. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.20593

OECD (2020). Test No. 458: Stably Transfected Human Androgen Receptor Transcriptional Activation Assay for Detection of Androgenic Agonist and Antagonist Activity of Chemicals. OECD Guide. Paris: OECD Publishing doi:10.1787/9789264264366-en.

Ogino, Y., Miyagawa, S., Katoh, H., Prins, G. S., Iguchi, T., & Yamada, G. (2011). Essential functions of androgen signaling emerged through the developmental analysis of vertebrate sex characteristics. Evolution & Development, 13(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-142X.2011.00482.x

Pedersen, E. B., Christiansen, S., & Svingen, T. (2022). AOP key event relationship report: Linking androgen receptor antagonism with nipple retention. Current Research in Toxicology, 3, 100085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crtox.2022.100085

Prizant, H., Gleicher, N., & Sen, A. (2014). Androgen actions in the ovary: balance is key. Journal of Endocrinology, 222(3), R141–R151. https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-14-0296

Rey, R. A. (2021). The Role of Androgen Signaling in Male Sexual Development at Puberty. Endocrinology, 162(2). https://doi.org/10.1210/endocr/bqaa215

Roy, A. K., Tyagi, R. K., Song, C. S., Lavrovsky, Y., Ahn, S. C., Oh, T. S., & Chatterjee, B. (2001). Androgen receptor: Structural domains and functional dynamics after ligand-receptor interaction. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 949, 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb04001.x

Sonneveld, E. (2005). Development of Androgen- and Estrogen-Responsive Bioassays, Members of a Panel of Human Cell Line-Based Highly Selective Steroid-Responsive Bioassays. Toxicological Sciences, 83(1), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfi005

Szafran, A. T., Szwarc, M., Marcelli, M., & Mancini, M. A. (2008). Androgen Receptor Functional Analyses by High Throughput Imaging: Determination of Ligand, Cell Cycle, and Mutation-Specific Effects. PLoS ONE, 3(11), e3605. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003605

Walters, K. A., Simanainen, U., & Handelsman, D. J. (2010). Molecular insights into androgen actions in male and female reproductive function from androgen receptor knockout models. In Human Reproduction Update (Vol. 16, Issue 5, pp. 543–558). Hum Reprod Update. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmq003

William H. Walker. (2021). Androgen Actions in the Testis and the Regulation of Spermatogenesis. In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology: Vol. volume 1381 (pp. 175–203).

Yeh, S., Miyamoto, H., & Chang, C. (1997). ARA70 and androgenic activity of hydroxyflutamide Hydroxyflutamide may not always be a pure antiandrogen (Vol. 349).

Relationship: 2124: Decrease, AR activation leads to Altered, Transcription of genes by the AR

AOPs Referencing Relationship

Evidence Supporting Applicability of this Relationship

This KER is applicable for both sexes, across developmental stages into adulthood, in numerous cells and tissues and across mammalian taxa. It is, however, acknowledged that this KER most likely has a much broader domain of applicability extending to non-mammalian vertebrates. AOP developers are encouraged to add additional relevant knowledge to expand on the applicability to also include other vertebrates.

Key Event Relationship Description

The androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-dependent nuclear transcription factor that upon activation translocates to the nucleus, dimerizes, and binds androgen response elements (AREs) to modulate transcription of target genes (Lamont and Tindall, 2010, Roy et al. 2001). Decreased activation of the AR affects its transcription factor activity, therefore leading to altered AR-target gene expression. This KER refers to decreased AR activation and altered gene expression occurring in complex systems, such as in vivo and the specific effect on transcription of AR target genes will depend on species, life stage, tissue, cell type etc.

Evidence Supporting this KER

The biological plausibility for this KER is considered high

The AR is a ligand-activated transcription factor part of the steroid hormone nuclear receptor family. Non-activated AR is found in the cytoplasm as a multiprotein complex with heat-shock proteins, immunophilins and, other chaperones (Roy et al. 2001). Upon activation through ligand binding, the AR dissociates from the protein complex, translocates to the nucleus and homodimerizes. Facilitated by co-regulators, AR can bind to DNA regions containing AREs and initiate transcription of target genes, that thus will be different in e.g. different tissues, life-stages, species etc.

Through mapping of AREs and ChIP sequencing studies, several AR target genes have been identified, mainly studied in prostate cells (Jin, Kim, and Yu 2013). Different co-regulators and ligands lead to altered expression of different sets of genes (Jin et al. 2013; Kanno et al. 2022). Alternative splicing of the AR can lead to different AR variants that also affects which genes are transcribed (Jin et al. 2013).

Apart from this canonical signaling pathway, the AR can suppress gene expression, indirectly regulate miRNA transcription, and have non-genomic effects by rapid activation of second messenger pathways in either presence or absence of a ligand (Jin et al. 2013).

The empirical evidence for this KER is considered high

In humans, altered gene expression profiling in individuals with androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) can provide supporting empirical evidence (Holterhus et al. 2003; Peng et al. 2021). In rodent AR knockout (KO) models, gene expression profiling studies and gene-targeted approaches have provided information on differentially expressed genes in several organ systems including male and female reproductive, endocrine, muscular, cardiovascular and nervous systems (Denolet et al. 2006; Fan et al. 2005; Holterhus et al. 2003; Ikeda et al. 2005; Karlsson et al. 2016; MacLean et al. 2008; Rana et al. 2011; Russell et al. 2012; Shiina et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2006; Welsh et al. 2012; Willems et al. 2010; Yu et al. 2008, 2012; Zhang et al. 2006; Zhou et al. 2011).

Exposure to known antiandrogens has been shown to alter transcriptional profiles, for example of neonatal pig ovaries (Knapczyk-Stwora et al. 2019).

Dose concordance has also been observed for instance in zebrafish embryos; a dose of 50 µg/L of the AR antagonist flutamide resulted in 674 differentially expressed genes at 96 h post fertilization whereas 500 µg/L flutamide resulted in 2871 differentially expressed genes (Ayobahan et al., 2023).

AR action has been reported to occur also without ligand binding. However, not much is known about the extent and biological implications of such non-canonical, ligand-independent AR activation (Bennesch and Picard 2015).

Quantitative Understanding of the Linkage

There is not enough data to define a quantitative relationship between AR activation and alteration of AR target gene transcription, and such a relationship will differ between biological systems (species, tissue, cell type, life stage etc).

AR and promoter interactions occur within 15 minutes of ligand binding, RNA polymerase II and coactivator recruitment are proposed to occur transiently with cycles of approximately 90 minutes in LNCaP cells (Kang et al. 2002). RNA polymerase II elongation rates in mammalian cells have been shown to range between 1.3 and 4.3 kb/min (Maiuri et al. 2011). Therefore, depending on the cell type and the half-life of the AR target gene transcripts, changes are to be expected within hours.

AR has been hypothesized to auto-regulate its mRNA and protein levels (Mora and Mahesh 1999).

References

Ayobahan, S. U., Alvincz, J., Reinwald, H., Strompen, J., Salinas, G., Schäfers, C., et al. (2023). Comprehensive identification of gene expression fingerprints and biomarkers of sexual endocrine disruption in zebrafish embryo. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 250, 114514. doi:10.1016/J.ECOENV.2023.114514.

Bennesch, Marcela A., and Didier Picard. 2015. “Minireview: Tipping the Balance: Ligand-Independent Activation of Steroid Receptors.” Molecular Endocrinology 29(3):349–63.

Chamberlain, Nancy L., Erika D. Driverand, and Roger L. Miesfeldi. 1994. The Length and Location of CAG Trinucleotide Repeats in the Androgen Receptor N-Terminal Domain Affect Transactivation Function. Vol. 22.

Denolet, Evi, Karel De Gendt, Joke Allemeersch, Kristof Engelen, Kathleen Marchal, Paul Van Hummelen, Karen A. L. Tan, Richard M. Sharpe, Philippa T. K. Saunders, Johannes V. Swinnen, and Guido Verhoeven. 2006. “The Effect of a Sertoli Cell-Selective Knockout of the Androgen Receptor on Testicular Gene Expression in Prepubertal Mice.” Molecular Endocrinology 20(2):321–34. doi: 10.1210/me.2005-0113.

Fan, Wuqiang, Toshihiko Yanase, Masatoshi Nomura, Taijiro Okabe, Kiminobu Goto, Takashi Sato, Hirotaka Kawano, Shigeaki Kato, and Hajime Nawata. 2005. Androgen Receptor Null Male Mice Develop Late-Onset Obesity Caused by Decreased Energy Expenditure and Lipolytic Activity but Show Normal Insulin Sensitivity With High Adiponectin Secretion. Vol. 54.

Holterhus, Paul-Martin, Olaf Hiort, Janos Demeter, Patrick O. Brown, and James D. Brooks. 2003. Differential Gene-Expression Patterns in Genital Fibroblasts of Normal Males and 46,XY Females with Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome: Evidence for Early Programming Involving the Androgen Receptor. Vol. 4.

Ikeda, Yasumasa, Ken Ichi Aihara, Takashi Sato, Masashi Akaike, Masanori Yoshizumi, Yuki Suzaki, Yuki Izawa, Mitsunori Fujimura, Shunji Hashizume, Midori Kato, Shusuke Yagi, Toshiaki Tamaki, Hirotaka Kawano, Takahiro Matsumoto, Hiroyuki Azuma, Shigeaki Kato, and Toshio Matsumoto. 2005. “Androgen Receptor Gene Knockout Male Mice Exhibit Impaired Cardiac Growth and Exacerbation of Angiotensin II-Induced Cardiac Fibrosis.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 280(33):29661–66. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411694200.

Jin, Hong Jian, Jung Kim, and Jindan Yu. 2013. “Androgen Receptor Genomic Regulation.” Translational Andrology and Urology 2(3):158–77.

Kang, Zhigang, Asta Pirskanen, Olli A. Jänne, and Jorma J. Palvimo. 2002. “Involvement of Proteasome in the Dynamic Assembly of the Androgen Receptor Transcription Complex.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 277(50):48366–71. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209074200.

Kanno, Yuichiro, Nao Saito, Ryota Saito, Tomohiro Kosuge, Ryota Shizu, Tomofumi Yatsu, Takuomi Hosaka, Kiyomitsu Nemoto, Keisuke Kato, and Kouichi Yoshinari. 2022. “Differential DNA-Binding and Cofactor Recruitment Are Possible Determinants of the Synthetic Steroid YK11-Dependent Gene Expression by Androgen Receptor in Breast Cancer MDA-MB 453 Cells.” Experimental Cell Research 419(2). doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2022.113333.

Karlsson, Sara A., Erik Studer, Petronella Kettunen, and Lars Westberg. 2016. “Neural Androgen Receptors Modulate Gene Expression and Social Recognition but Not Social Investigation.” Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 10(MAR). doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00041.

Knapczyk-Stwora, Katarzyna, Anna Nynca, Renata E. Ciereszko, Lukasz Paukszto, Jan P. Jastrzebski, Elzbieta Czaja, Patrycja Witek, Marek Koziorowski, and Maria Slomczynska. 2019. “Flutamide-Induced Alterations in Transcriptional Profiling of Neonatal Porcine Ovaries.” Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 10(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/s40104-019-0340-y.

Lamont, K. R., and Tindall, D. J. (2010). Androgen Regulation of Gene Expression. Adv. Cancer Res. 107, 137–162. doi:10.1016/S0065-230X(10)07005-3.

MacLean, Helen E., W. S. Maria Chiu, Amanda J. Notini, Anna-Maree Axell, Rachel A. Davey, Julie F. McManus, Cathy Ma, David R. Plant, Gordon S. Lynch, and Jeffrey D. Zajac. 2008. “ Impaired Skeletal Muscle Development and Function in Male, but Not Female, Genomic Androgen Receptor Knockout Mice .” The FASEB Journal 22(8):2676–89. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-105726.

Maiuri, Paolo, Anna Knezevich, Alex De Marco, Davide Mazza, Anna Kula, Jim G. McNally, and Alessandro Marcello. 2011. “Fast Transcription Rates of RNA Polymerase II in Human Cells.” EMBO Reports 12(12):1280–85. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.196.

Mora, Gloria R., and Virendra B. Mahesh. 1999. Autoregulation of the Androgen Receptor at the Translational Level: Testosterone Induces Accumulation of Androgen Receptor MRNA in the Rat Ventral Prostate Polyribosomes.

Peng, Yajie, Hui Zhu, Bing Han, Yue Xu, Xuemeng Liu, Huaidong Song, and Jie Qiao. 2021. “Identification of Potential Genes in Pathogenesis and Diagnostic Value Analysis of Partial Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome Using Bioinformatics Analysis.” Frontiers in Endocrinology 12. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.731107.

Rana, Kesha, Barbara C. Fam, Michele V Clarke, Tammy P. S. Pang, Jeffrey D. Zajac, and Helen E. Maclean. 2011. “Increased Adiposity in DNA Binding-Dependent Androgen Receptor Knockout Male Mice Associated with Decreased Voluntary Activity and Not Insulin Resistance.” Am J Physiol Endocrinol Me-Tab 301:767–78. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00584.2010.-In.

Roy, Arun K., Rakesh K. Tyagi, Chung S. Song, Yan Lavrovsky, Soon C. Ahn, Tae Sung Oh, and Bandana Chatterjee. 2001. “Androgen Receptor: Structural Domains and Functional Dynamics after Ligand-Receptor Interaction.” Pp. 44–57 in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Vol. 949. New York Academy of Sciences.

Russell, Patricia K., Michele V. Clarke, Jarrod P. Skinner, Tammy P. S. Pang, Jeffrey D. Zajac, and Rachel A. Davey. 2012. “Identification of Gene Pathways Altered by Deletion of the Androgen Receptor Specifically in Mineralizing Osteoblasts and Osteocytes in Mice.” Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 49(1):1–10. doi: 10.1530/JME-12-0014.

Shiina, Hiroko, Takahiro Matsumoto, Takashi Sato, Katsuhide Igarashi, Junko Miyamoto, Sayuri Takemasa, Matomo Sakari, Ichiro Takada, Takashi Nakamura, Daniel Metzger, Pierre Chambon, Jun Kanno, Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, and Shigeaki Kato. 2006. Premature Ovarian Failure in Androgen Receptor-Deficient Mice. Vol. 103.

Supakar, P. C., C. S. Song, M. H. Jung, M. A. Slomczynska, J. M. Kim, R. L. Vellanoweth, B. Chatterjee, and A. K. Roy. 1993. “A Novel Regulatory Element Associated with Age-Dependent Expression of the Rat Androgen Receptor Gene.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 268(35):26400–408. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)74328-2.

Tut, Thein G., Farid J. Ghadessy, M. A. Trifiro, L. Pinsky, and E. L. Yong. 1997. Long Polyglutamine Tracts in the Androgen Receptor Are Associated with Reduced Trans-Activation, Impaired Sperm Production, and Male Infertility*. Vol. 82.

Wang, Ruey Sheng, Shuyuan Yeh, Lu Min Chen, Hung Yun Lin, Caixia Zhang, Jing Ni, Cheng Chia Wu, P. Anthony Di Sant’Agnese, Karen L. DeMesy-Bentley, Chii Ruey Tzeng, and Chawnshang Chang. 2006. “Androgen Receptor in Sertoli Cell Is Essential for Germ Cell Nursery and Junctional Complex Formation in Mouse Testes.” Endocrinology 147(12):5624–33. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-0138.

Welsh, M., L. Moffat, K. Belling, L. R. de França, T. M. Segatelli, P. T. K. Saunders, R. M. Sharpe, and L. B. Smith. 2012. “Androgen Receptor Signalling in Peritubular Myoid Cells Is Essential for Normal Differentiation and Function of Adult Leydig Cells.” International Journal of Andrology 35(1):25–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2011.01150.x.

Willems, Ariane, Sergio R. Batlouni, Arantza Esnal, Johannes V. Swinnen, Philippa T. K. Saunders, Richard M. Sharpe, Luiz R. França, Karel de Gendt, and Guido Verhoeven. 2010. “Selective Ablation of the Androgen Receptor in Mouse Sertoli Cells Affects Sertoli Cell Maturation, Barrier Formation and Cytoskeletal Development.” PLoS ONE 5(11). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014168.

Wu, D. I., Grace Lin, and Andrea C. Gore. 2009. “Age-Related Changes in Hypothalamic Androgen Receptor and Estrogen Receptor in Male Rats.” The Journal of Comparative Neurology 512:688–701. doi: 10.1002/cne.21925.

Yu, I. Chen, Hung Yun Lin, Ning Chun Liu, Ruey Shen Wang, Janet D. Sparks, Shuyuan Yeh, and Chawnshang Chang. 2008. “Hyperleptinemia without Obesity in Male Mice Lacking Androgen Receptor in Adipose Tissue.” Endocrinology 149(5):2361–68. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-0516.

Yu, Shengqiang, Chiuan Ren Yeh, Yuanjie Niu, Hong Chiang Chang, Yu Chieh Tsai, Harold L. Moses, Chih Rong Shyr, Chawnshang Chang, and Shuyuan Yeh. 2012. “Altered Prostate Epithelial Development in Mice Lacking the Androgen Receptor in Stromal Fibroblasts.” Prostate 72(4):437–49. doi: 10.1002/pros.21445.

Zhang, Caixia, Shuyuan Yeh, Yen-Ta Chen, Cheng-Chia Wu, Kuang-Hsiang Chuang, Hung-Yun Lin, Ruey-Sheng Wang, Yu-Jia Chang, Chamindrani Mendis-Handagama, Liquan Hu, Henry Lardy, Chawnshang Chang, and † † George. 2006. Oligozoospermia with Normal Fertility in Male Mice Lacking the Androgen Receptor in Testis Peritubular Myoid Cells.

Zhou, Wei, Gensheng Wang, Christopher L. Small, Zhilin Liu, Connie C. Weng, Lizhong Yang, Michael D. Griswold, and Marvin L. Meistrich. 2011. “Erratum: Gene Expression Alterations by Conditional Knockout of Androgen Receptor in Adult Sertoli Cells of Utp14bjsd/Jsd (Jsd) Mice (Biology of Reproduction (2010) 83, (759-766) DOI: 10.1095/Biolreprod.110.085472).” Biology of Reproduction 84(2):400–408.

Relationship: 2828: Decrease, AR activation leads to Hypospadias

AOPs Referencing Relationship

Evidence Supporting Applicability of this Relationship

Taxonomic applicability

In mammals, androgens are one of the primary drivers of penis differentiation. Hypospadias has been observed in several mammals, but most frequently reported in laboratory rodents and in humans (Chang et al., 2020; S. Wang & Zheng, 2025). In vivo studies in rats and mice show that in utero exposure to anti-androgenic chemicals can cause hypospadias in male offspring (see table 3). Many human case studies report boys born with hypospadias and associated deficiency in steroid hormone synthesis, 5α-reductase activity, or androgen receptor (AR) activity (see table 4).

The biologically plausible domain of applicability may extend beyond the empirical domain because androgen-controlled development of male external genitalia is evolutionary conserved in most mammals and, to some extent, also in other vertebrate classes (Gredler et al., 2014). Hypospadias can in principle occur in all animals that form a genital tubercle and have been observed in many domestic animal species including dog (Sonne et al., 2008; Switonski et al., 2018), cat (Nowacka-Woszuk et al., 2014), cattle (Murakami, 2008), sheep (Smith et al., 2012), and horse (De Lorenzi et al., 2010) as well as in wildlife species such as polar bear (Stamper et al., 1999), giraffe (Meuffels et al., 2020), and Tamar Wallaby (Leihy et al., 2011). The observed hypospadias in these animals is not, per se, linked to anti-androgenic exposure, which has only been sparsely investigated in other species than mice, rats, and humans. One study in monkeys did show hypospadias upon oral exposure to finasteride (Prahalada et al., 1997), and bicalutamide exposure induced hypospadias in guinea pigs (S. Wang et al., 2018). A study in rabbits exposed to procymidone did not find hypospadias in males (Inawaka et al., 2010). Another study in hyenas did also not find hypospadias in males after exposure to the anti-androgen finasteride (Drea et al., 1998), but it should be noted that the hyenas have a remarkable sexual development where penile growth occur in both females and males before androgen synthesis is initiated (Cunha et al., 2014) (the studies in hyena and rabbit were identified in our evidence collection but were judged as ‘unreliable’ and therefore not included as empirical evidence).

Sex applicability

The androgen receptor is expressed in the fetal genital tubercle of both females and males (Amato & Yao, 2021; Baskin et al., 2020), but hypospadias is primarily a term used for a malformation of the penis (Baskin & Ebbers, 2006), limiting the applicability of this KER to males.

Life stage applicability

Differentiation of the penis occurs during fetal life in the masculinization programming window (MPW) (GD 16-20 in rats, around gestational weeks 8-14 in humans), when androgen production is high (Welsh et al., 2008; C. Wolf et al., 2000a). In rats, exposure to anti-androgenic chemicals outside of, or in the late part of the MPW does not cause hypospadias or only to a low degree (Clark et al., 1993; van den Driesche et al., 2017; C. Wolf et al., 2000a), while exposure in the earlier (or full) MPW causes a higher frequency of hypospadias (depending on dose and chemical) (table 3). In humans, hypospadias can be diagnosed at birth (X. Yu et al., 2019), while in rodents, some parts of penis development occur postnatally (Schlomer et al., 2013; Sinclair et al., 2017). In these species, hypospadias may be observed at birth but is optimally diagnosed and severity classified weeks later. Given that disruptions to androgen programming takes place in fetal life, even though the AO is best detected postnatally, the life stage applicability is defined as fetal life.

Key Event Relationship Description

This non-adjacent KER describes a fetal decrease in androgen receptor (AR) activation in the genital tubercle causing hypospadias in male offspring, postnatally. During fetal development, androgens induce differentiation of the bipotential genital tubercle to a penis, including closure of the urethra. Androgens signal through AR and reduced fetal AR activation can therefore disrupt penis differentiation and lead to the genital malformation hypospadias. Reduced AR activation may happen both through reduced ligand availability (testosterone or dihydrotestosterone (DHT)) and by direct antagonism of AR (Amato et al., 2022; Mattiske & Pask, 2021).

The upstream KE ‘decrease, androgen receptor activation’ (KE 1614) refers to the in vivo event of overall reduction in AR activation. In this case, it therefore refers to a reduction in AR activation in the genital tubercle. Currently, decreased AR activation in mammals is only directly measured in vitro and not in vivo. Instead, indirect assessment of this KE may come from assays measuring AR antagonism, 5α-reductase activity (the enzyme converting testosterone to DHT), or decreased androgen levels (Draskau et al., 2024).

Evidence Supporting this KER

The biological plausibility for this KER is judged as high. This is largely based on canonical knowledge on normal reproductive development.

The penis originates from a sexually bipotential structure, the genital tubercle, which may differentiate to either a penis or a clitoris, depending on internal cues during fetal development. In males, the fetal testes produce large amounts of testosterone, which can subsequently be converted to the more potent androgen DHT by 5α-reductase in peripheral tissues. Testosterone and DHT both signal through AR in target tissues to initiate masculinization (Amato et al., 2022; Murashima et al., 2015). The critical developmental window for androgen programming of masculinization has been identified in rats as GD16-20, and is proposed to be gestational weeks 8-14 in humans (Sharpe, 2020; Welsh et al., 2008). As part of the masculinization process orchestrated by androgens, the genital tubercle differentiates to a penis, which at this point expresses AR in both humans and rodents (Amato & Yao, 2021; Baskin et al., 2020). This includes androgen-mediated elongation of the tubercle, formation of the prepuce, and tubular internalization of urethra, which is closed at the distal tip of the glans penis (Amato et al., 2022). Failure of full closure of the urethra can result in hypospadias, in which the urethra terminates at the ventral side of the penis instead of at the tip (Baskin & Ebbers, 2006; Cohn, 2011).

The dependency of androgens for penile development has been demonstrated in mice with conditional or full knockout of Ar, which results in partly or full sex-reversal of males, including a female-like urethral opening (Willingham et al., 2006; Yucel et al., 2004; Zheng et al., 2015). Similarly, female rats and mice exposed in utero to testosterone present with varying degrees of intersexuality, including, in some cases, a penis (Greene & Ivy, 1937; Zheng et al., 2015).

The empirical evidence for this KER is generally judged high. This includes evidence from in vivo animal studies and evidence from studies in humans. The upstream KE ‘Decreased AR activity’ refers to an in vivo effect, for which no methods for measurement of this in vivo in mammals currently exist. The effects on the upstream KE were therefore indirectly informed as described in each section.

Animal studies

Effects on the upstream KE were indirectly informed by including animal studies with stressors that are known to reduce AR activity through antagonizing the AR, lowering testosterone production, or inhibiting 5α-reductase. Six stressors, with established anti-androgenic effects, were included (more detailed evaluation of these chemicals can be found in KER-2820 (Holmer et al., 2024)). Table 3 summarizes the empirical evidence and confidence level for each chemical. Details on included evidence is presented in Table 1 in Appendix 2, 9prbqyba2x_Appendix_2_KER_2828.pdf. In summary, all six substances were shown to cause hypospadias in male offspring, and the confidence level for all substances was judged as strong, as conflicting results could be explained (see the section ‘Uncertainties and inconsistencies’). Thus, antagonism or AR, inhibition of 5α-reductase, or reduction in testosterone synthesis, all lead to hypospadias.

Table 3 Summary of empirical evidence for the KER – animal studies. See Table 1 in Appendix 2 ( 9prbqyba2x_Appendix_2_KER_2828.pdf) for details.

Supporting human evidence

Effects on the upstream KE were indirectly informed by including studies in humans with a condition (genetic or other) that would reduce or disrupt either 1) function of AR, 2) conversion of testosterone to DHT by disrupting 5α-reductase activity, or 3) production of androgen hormones. Studies measuring low testosterone levels with no underlying cause were also included (see evidence collection strategy). Table 4 lists the studies, in which these conditions were linked to hypospadias in males.

Table 4 Supporting evidence for the KER – human studies. The table lists human studies reporting hypospadias in association with an upstream defect in AR activity, grouped according to the precise effect, and how it was diagnosed (mutation, in vitro activity, or blood hormone and metabolite profile). SRD5A2: 5α-reductase 2; HSD17B3: 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 3; HSD3B2: 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 2; CYP17A1: 17α-hydroxylase. See table 2 in Appendix 2  (9prbqyba2x_Appendix_2_KER_2828.pdf) for all included references.

Six case-control studies were extracted, all of which found a correlation between lower testosterone levels (basal or hCG-stimulated) and hypospadias (Austin et al., 2002; Okuyama et al., 1981; Raboch et al., 1976; Ratan et al., 2012; Svensson et al., 1979; Yadav et al., 2011). In two of these studies, the correlation was age-dependent (Austin et al., 2002; Raboch et al., 1976)

One epidemiologic study was extracted, which investigated the association between phthalate exposure and hypospadias risk.  Western Australian women exposed through their occupation to phthalates were more likely to have sons with hypospadias (Nassar et al., 2010). It should be noted that there are reported species differences in the effects of phthalates (including DEHP and DBP) on fetal testosterone production between humans, mice, and rats, and the direct translatability of the in vivo evidence is uncertain (Sharpe, 2020).

Dose concordance

Direct information about dose concordance is not available because AR activity currently cannot be measured in vivo.

Indirect information on dose concordance can be obtained from empirical evidence. In utero exposure of rats to DBP caused a dose-dependent decrease in serum testosterone levels at PND70 with LOAEL 250 mg/kg bw/day. Hypospadias was observed at this stage with LOAEL 500 mg/kg bw/day (Jiang et al., 2007). It should be noted that fetal testosterone levels were not measured.

Temporal concordance

Direct information about temporal concordance is not available because AR activity currently cannot be measured in vivo.

Indirect information on temporal concordance can be obtained from empirical evidence. In two studies, in which rats were exposed in utero to 750 mg/kg bw/day DBP, intratesticular testosterone levels were reduced in fetal testes, while hypospadias was identified in adult males. Plasma levels of testosterone were also measured in adults, and testosterone levels in exposed males were not significantly different from control males (van den Driesche et al., 2017, 2020). This has also been shown in a study with 500 mg/kg bw/day DBP (Drake et al., 2009). These studies indicate temporal concordance. Another study with DBP-induced hypospadias in rats saw a dose-dependent reduction in serum testosterone levels at PND70 after in utero exposure to as low as 250 mg/kg bw/day from GD14-18 (Jiang et al., 2007), though fetal testosterone levels were not measured in this study.

Incidence Concordance

Direct information about dose concordance is not available because AR activity currently cannot be measured in vivo.

Indirect information on incidence concordance can be obtained from empirical evidence. In the dose-response study with DBP, the incidence of hypospadias was 6.8% for 500 mg/kg bw/day DBP and 41.3% for 750 mg/kg bw/day. When separating hypospadias males from exposed males without hypospadias, plasma testosterone levels were decreased in both groups, indicating that DBP reduced testosterone levels at higher incidence than hypospadias (Jiang et al., 2007). The same was seen in another study with DBP, in which serum testosterone levels at PND7 were reduced in both hypospadiac and non-malformed males exposed to 750 mg/kg bw/day DBP from GD14-18 (Jiang et al., 2016).

The in vivo studies do not directly inform about the upstream KE, ‘decreased AR activity’. The direct concordance between the KEs can therefore not be determined from the evidence.

For flutamide, two studies reported 100% hypospadias frequencies at doses of 6.25 and 10 mg/kg bw/day (Goto et al., 2004; McIntyre et al., 2001), while another study found a frequency of 56.9% when giving 20 mg/kg bw/day (Kita et al., 2016). This might be explained by a longer exposure window in the first two studies and uncertainties in assessment of hypospadias.

For DBP, there were discrepancies in whether 250 mg/kg bw/day was LOAEL (Mylchreest et al., 1998, 1999) or NOAEL (Jiang et al., 2007) for DBP. This conflict was explained by differences in exposure windows, supported by the observation that the frequency of hypospadias at 250 mg/kg bw/day was reported as very low (Mylchreest et al., 1998, 1999).

One study with vinclozolin (Ostby J et al., 1999) and one with procymidone (Hass et al., 2012) did not find hypospadias after in utero exposure. In both cases, this was likely due to too low doses tested.

In most of the human studies of steroidogenesis deficiency, serum or plasma levels of testosterone were reduced at baseline and/or upon hCG stimulation (Al-Sinani et al., 2015; Ammini et al., 1997; Cara et al., 1985; Chen, Huang, et al., 2021; Dean et al., 1984; Galli-Tsinopoulou et al., 2018; Imperato-McGinley et al., 1979; Kaufman et al., 1983; Mendonca et al., 1987, 2000; Neocleous et al., 2012; New, 1970; Pang et al., 1983; Perrone et al., 1985; Rabbani et al., 2012; Sherbet et al., 2003), but in a few studies, testosterone levels were normal (Donadille et al., 2018; Kon et al., 2015; Luna et al., 2021). In these cases, the effect of these deficiencies on tissue AR activity is uncertain.

For AR CAG repeat length, a case-control study did not find an association with hypospadias (Radpour R et al., 2007), but this could be because the hypospadias cases included had other etiologies.

Lastly, as there are currently no universal guidelines for identification and scoring of hypospadias in rodents, there are large variations in methods of assessment, and minor cases of hypospadias may be overlooked in some studies and included in others. This poses an uncertainty in the frequency reports in the scientific evidence.

Quantitative Understanding of the Linkage

The quantitative understanding of the relationship is low. As there are currently no direct measurement methods of the upstream KE (reduced AR activity) in mammals, quantification of the relationship is difficult to assess.

A model for phthalates has been developed, aiming to predict the frequency of hypospadias in male offspring based on reductions in ex vivo testosterone production, an indirect indication of AR activity. In this model, hypospadias was induced from around a 60% reduction in testosterone levels. The model does not consider hypospadias severity and is only for phthalate chemicals (Earl Gray et al., 2024).

The time-scale of this KER depends on the species but is likely days to weeks.

AR activation happens within minutes, from ligand binding to nuclear translocation and promotor activation (Nightingale et al., 2003; Schaufele et al., 2005), while transcriptional and translational effects are observed minutes to hours later (Kang et al., 2002). AR programming of the genital tubercle occurs during fetal development in the Masculinization Programming Window (Sharpe, 2020). The time-scale for morphological effects in the tissue then depends on the species. In humans, penis development is completed prior to birth and hypospadias can be observed at birth. In rodents, penis development is not fully completed until weeks after birth, but hypospadias can often be observed earlier than this (table 3). 

There are no known feedforward/feedback loops influencing this KER.

References

Al-Sinani, A., Mula-Abed, W., Al-Kindi, M., Al-Kusaibi, G., Al-Azkawi, H., & Nahavandi, N. (2015). A Novel Mutation Causing 17-β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 3 Deficiency in an Omani Child: First Case Report and Review of Literature. Oman Medical Journal, 30(2), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2015.27

Amato, C. M., & Yao, H. H.-C. (2021). Developmental and sexual dimorphic atlas of the prenatal mouse external genitalia at the single-cell level. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(25). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2103856118

Amato, C. M., Yao, H. H.-C., & Zhao, F. (2022). One Tool for Many Jobs: Divergent and Conserved Actions of Androgen Signaling in Male Internal Reproductive Tract and External Genitalia. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 13, 910964. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.910964

Ammini, A., Sharma, D., Gupta, R., Mohapatra, I., Kucheria, K., Kriplani, A., Takkar, D., Mitra, D., & Vijayaraghavan, M. (1997). Familial male pseudohermaphroditism. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 64(3), 419–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02845218

Austin, P., Siow, Y., Fallat, M., Cain, M., Rink, R., & Casale, A. (2002). The relationship between müllerian inhibiting substance and androgens in boys with hypospadias. The Journal of Urology, 168(4), 1784–1788; discussion 1788. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000023680.64155.5c

Baskin, L., Cao, M., Sinclair, A., Li, Y., Overland, M., Isaacson, D., & Cunha, G. R. (2020). Androgen and estrogen receptor expression in the developing human penis and clitoris. Differentiation; Research in Biological Diversity, 111, 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diff.2019.08.005

Baskin, L., & Ebbers, M. (2006). Hypospadias: Anatomy, etiology, and technique. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 41(3), 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.11.059

Cara, J., Jr Moshang, T., Bongiovanni, A., & Marx, B. (1985). Elevated 17-hydroxyprogesterone and testosterone in a newborn with 3-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency. The New England Journal of Medicine, 313(10), 618–621. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198509053131007

Chamberlain, N. L., Driver, E. D., & Miesfeld, R. L. (1994). The length and location of CAG trinucleotide repeats in the androgen receptor N-terminal domain affect transactivation function. Nucleic Acids Research, 22(15), 3181–3186. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.15.3181

Chang, J., Wang, S., & Zheng, Z. (2020). Etiology of Hypospadias: A Comparative Review of Genetic Factors and Developmental Processes Between Human and Animal Models. Research and Reports in Urology, Volume 12, 673–686. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S276141

Chen, L., Huang, H., Zhang, H., Zhu, G., & Zhu, M. (2021). Three cases of 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency: Clinical analysis. Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine : Official Organ Wroclaw Medical           University, 30(3), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/131220

Clark, R., Anderson, C., Prahalada, S., Robertson, R., Lochry, E., Leonard, Y., Stevens, J., & Hoberman, A. (1993). Critical developmental periods for effects on male rat genitalia induced by finasteride, a 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 119(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1006/taap.1993.1041

Cohn, M. J. (2011). Development of the external genitalia: Conserved and divergent mechanisms of appendage patterning. Developmental Dynamics, 240(5), 1108–1115. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.22631

Cunha, G. R., Risbridger, G., Wang, H., Place, N. J., Grumbach, M., Cunha, T. J., Weldele, M., Conley, A. J., Barcellos, D., Agarwal, S., Bhargava, A., Drea, C., Hammond, G. L., Siiteri, P., Coscia, E. M., McPhaul, M. J., Baskin, L. S., & Glickman, S. E. (2014). Development of the external genitalia: Perspectives from the spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta). Differentiation, 87(1–2), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diff.2013.12.003

De Lorenzi, L., Genualdo, V., Iannuzzi, A., Di Meo, G. P., Perucatti, A., Mancuso, R., Russo, M., Di Berardino, D., Parma, P., & Iannuzzi, L. (2010). Cytogenetic and Genetic Studies in a Hypospadic Horse (Equus caballus, 2n = 64). Sexual Development, 4(6), 352–357. https://doi.org/10.1159/000319527

Dean, H., Shackleton, C., & Winter, J. (1984). Diagnosis and natural history of 17-hydroxylase deficiency in a newborn male. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 59(3), 513–520. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-59-3-513

Donadille, B., Houang, M., Netchine, I., Siffroi, J., & Christin-Maitre, S. (2018). Human 3beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency associated with normal spermatic numeration despite a severe enzyme deficit. Endocrine Connections, 7(3), 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-17-0306

Drake, A., van den Driesche, S., Scott, H., Hutchison, G., Seckl, J., & Sharpe, R. (2009). Glucocorticoids amplify dibutyl phthalate-induced disruption of testosterone production and male reproductive development. Endocrinology, 150(11), 5055–5064. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2009-0700

Draskau, M. K., Rosenmai, A. K., Bouftas, N., Johansson, H. K. L., Panagiotou, E. M., Holmer, M. L., Elmelund, E., Zilliacus, J., Beronius, A., Damdimopolou, P., van Duursen, M., & Svingen, T. (2024). AOP Report: An Upstream Network for Reduced Androgen Signaling Leading to Altered Gene Expression of Androgen Receptor-Responsive Genes in Target Tissues. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5972

Drea, C., Weldele, M., Forger, N., Coscia, E., Frank, L., Licht, P., & Glickman, S. (1998). Androgens and masculinization of genitalia in the spotted hyaena (Crocuta crocuta). 2. Effects of prenatal anti-androgens. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 113(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.1130117

Earl Gray, L. J., Lambright, C., Evans, N., Ford, J., & Conley, M. (2024). Using targeted fetal rat testis genomic and endocrine alterations to predict the effects of a phthalate mixture on the male reproductive tract. Current Research in Toxicology, 7, 100180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crtox.2024.100180

Foster, P. M. D. (2006). Disruption of reproductive development in male rat offspring following in utero exposure to phthalate esters. International Journal of Andrology, 29(1), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00563.x

Galli-Tsinopoulou, A., Serbis, A., KotanidouP, E., Litou, E., Dokousli, V., Mouzaki, K., Fanis, P., Neocleous, V., & Skordis, N. (2018). 46,XY Disorder of Sex Development due to 17-Beta Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 3 Deficiency in an Infant of Greek Origin. Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology, 10(1), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.4274/jcrpe.4829

Goto, K., Koizumi, K., Takaori, H., Fujii, Y., Furuyama, Y., Saika, O., Suzuki, H., Saito, K., & Suzuki, K. (2004). Effects of flutamide on sex maturation and behavior of offspring born to female rats treated during late pregnancy. The Journal of Toxicological Sciences, 29(5), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.29.517

Gredler, M. L., Larkins, C. E., Leal, F., Lewis, A. K., Herrera, A. M., Perriton, C. L., Sanger, T. J., & Cohn, M. J. (2014). Evolution of External Genitalia: Insights from Reptilian Development. Sexual Development, 8(5), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1159/000365771

Greene, R. R., & Ivy, A. C. (1937). THE EXPERIMENTAL PRODUCTION OF INTERSEXUALITY IN THE FEMALE RAT WITH TESTOSTERONE. Science (New York, N.Y.), 86(2226), 200–201. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.86.2226.200-a

Hass, U., Boberg, J., Christiansen, S., Jacobsen, P., Vinggaard, A., Taxvig, C., Poulsen, M., Herrmann, S., Jensen, B., Petersen, A., Clemmensen, L., & Axelstad, M. (2012). Adverse effects on sexual development in rat offspring after low dose exposure to a mixture of endocrine disrupting pesticides. Reproductive Toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.), 34(2), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2012.05.090

Holmer, M. L., Zilliacus, J., Draskau, M. K., Hlisníková, H., Beronius, A., & Svingen, T. (2024). Methodology for developing data-rich Key Event Relationships for Adverse Outcome Pathways exemplified by linking decreased androgen receptor activity with decreased anogenital distance. Reproductive Toxicology, 128, 108662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2024.108662

Imperato-McGinley, J., Peterson, R., Stoller, R., & Goodwin, W. (1979). Male pseudohermaphroditism secondary to 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency: Gender role change with puberty. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 49(3), 391–395. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-49-3-391

Inawaka, K., Kishimoto, N., Higuchi, H., & Kawamura, S. (2010). Maternal exposure to procymidone has no effects on fetal external genitalia development in male rabbit fetuses in a modified developmental toxicity study. JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 35(3), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.35.299

Jiang, J., Ma, L., Yuan, L., Wang, X., & Zhang, W. (2007). Study on developmental abnormalities in hypospadiac male rats induced by maternal exposure to di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP). Toxicology, 232(3), 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2007.01.018

Jiang, J., Zhong, C., Zhu, Y., XuL, D., Wood, K., Sun, W., Li, E., Liu, Z., Zhao, W., Ruan, Y., & Xia, S. (2016). Prenatal exposure to di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) differentially alters androgen cascade in undeformed versus hypospadiac male rat offspring. Reproductive Toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.), 61, 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.02.016

Kang, H.-Y., Huang, K.-E., Chang, S. Y., Ma, W.-L., Lin, W.-J., & Chang, C. (2002). Differential Modulation of Androgen Receptor-mediated Transactivation by Smad3 and Tumor Suppressor Smad4. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 277(46), 43749–43756. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M205603200

Kaufman, F., Costin, G., Goebelsmann, U., Stanczyk, F., & Zachmann, M. (1983). Male pseudohermaphroditism due to 17,20-desmolase deficiency. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 57(1), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-57-1-32

Kelce, W. R., Lambright, C. R., Gray, L. E., & Roberts, K. P. (1997). Vinclozolin andp,p′-DDE Alter Androgen-Dependent Gene Expression:In VivoConfirmation of an Androgen Receptor-Mediated Mechanism. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 142(1), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1006/taap.1996.7966

Kelce, W. R., Monosson, E., Gamcsik, M. P., Laws, S. C., & Gray, L. E. (1994). Environmental Hormone Disruptors: Evidence That Vinclozolin Developmental Toxicity Is Mediated by Antiandrogenic Metabolites. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 126(2), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1006/taap.1994.1117

Kita, D., Meyer, K., Venturelli, A., Adams, R., Machado, D., Morais, R., Swan, S., Gennings, C., & Martino-Andrade, A. (2016). Manipulation of pre and postnatal androgen environments and anogenital distance in rats. TOXICOLOGY, 368, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2016.08.021

Kon, M., Suzuki, E., Dung, V., Hasegawa, Y., Mitsui, T., Muroyas, K., Ueoka, K., Igarashi, N., Nagasaki, K., Oto, Y., Hamajima, T., Yoshino, K., Igarashi, M., Kato-Fukui, Y., Nakabayashi, K., Hayashi, K., Hata, K., Matsubara, Y., Moriya, K., … Fukami, M. (2015). Molecular basis of non-syndromic hypospadias: Systematic mutation screening and genome-wide copy-number analysis of 62 patients. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 30(3), 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu364

Leihy, M. W., Shaw, G., Wilson, J. D., & Renfree, M. B. (2011). Development of the Penile Urethra in the Tammar Wallaby. Sexual Development, 5(5), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1159/000334053

Luna, S., Wegner, D., Gale, S., Yang, P., Hollander, A., St Dennis-Feezle, L., Nabhan, Z., Ory, D., Cole, F., & Wambach, J. (2021). Whole exome sequencing and functional characterization increase diagnostic yield in siblings with a 46, XY difference of sexual development (DSD). The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 212, 105908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2021.105908

Mattiske, D. M., & Pask, A. J. (2021). Endocrine disrupting chemicals in the pathogenesis of hypospadias; developmental and toxicological perspectives. Current Research in Toxicology, 2, 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crtox.2021.03.004

McIntyre, B., Barlow, N., & Foster, P. (2001). Androgen-mediated development in male rat offspring exposed to flutamide in utero: Permanence and correlation of early postnatal changes in anogenital distance and nipple retention with malformations in androgen-dependent tissues. Toxicological Sciences : An Official Journal of the Society of Toxicology, 62(2), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/62.2.236

Mendonca, B., Bloise, W., Arnhold, I., Batista, M., Toledo, S., Drummond, M., Nicolau, W., & Mattar, E. (1987). Male pseudohermaphroditism due to nonsalt-losing 3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency: Gender role change and absence of gynecomastia at puberty. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry, 28(6), 669–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4731(87)90396-7

Mendonca, B., Inacio, M., Arnhold, I., Costa, E., Bloise, W., Martin, R., Denes, F., Silva, F., Andersson, S., Lindqvist, A., & Wilson, J. (2000). Male pseudohermaphroditism due to 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 3 deficiency. Diagnosis, psychological evaluation, and management. Medicine, 79(5), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005792-200009000-00003

Meuffels, J., Luther-Binoir, I., Daffue, W., Deacon, F., & Mitchell, E. P. (2020). Testicular disorder of sexual development with cryptorchidism, penile hypoplasia and hypospadias in a giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis giraffa). JOURNAL OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN VETERINARY ASSOCIATION, 91. https://doi.org/10.4102/jsava.v91i0.1971

Murakami, T. (2008). Anatomical Examination of Hypospadias in Cattle. Journal of the Japan Veterinary Medical Association, 61(12), 931–935. https://doi.org/10.12935/jvma1951.61.931

Murashima, A., Kishigami, S., Thomson, A., & Yamada, G. (2015). Androgens and mammalian male reproductive tract development. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms, 1849(2), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.05.020

Mylchreest, E., Cattley, R., & Foster, P. (1998). Male reproductive tract malformations in rats following gestational and lactational exposure to Di(n-butyl) phthalate: An antiandrogenic mechanism? Toxicological Sciences : An Official Journal of the Society of Toxicology, 43(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1006/toxs.1998.2436

Mylchreest, E., Sar, M., Cattley, R., & Foster, P. (1999). Disruption of androgen-regulated male reproductive development by di(n-butyl) phthalate during late gestation in rats is different from flutamide. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 156(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1006/taap.1999.8643

Nassar, N., Abeywardana, P., Barker, A., & Bower, C. (2010). Parental occupational exposure to potential endocrine disrupting chemicals and risk of hypospadias in infants. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 67(9), 585–589. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2009.048272

Neocleous, V., Sismani, C., Shammas, C., Efstathiou, E., Alexandrou, A., Ioannides, M., Argyrou, M., Patsalis, P., Phylactou, L., & Skordis, N. (2012). Duplication of exons 3-10 of the HSD17B3 gene: A novel type of genetic defect underlying 17 beta-HSD-3 deficiency. GENE, 499(2), 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2012.03.031

New, M. (1970). Male pseudohermaphroditism due to 17 alpha-hydroxylase deficiency. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 49(10), 1930–1941. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI106412

Nightingale, J., Chaudhary, K. S., Abel, P. D., Stubbs, A. P., Romanska, H. M., Mitchell, S. E., Stamp, G. W. H., & Lalani, E.-N. (2003). Ligand Activation of the Androgen Receptor Downregulates E-Cadherin-Mediated Cell Adhesion and Promotes Apoptosis of Prostatic Cancer Cells. Neoplasia, 5(4), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1476-5586(03)80028-3

Nowacka-Woszuk, J., Szczerbal, I., Salamon, S., Kociucka, B., Jackowiak, H., Prozorowska, E., Slaska, B., Rozanska, D., Orzelski, M., Ochota, M., Dzimira, S., Lipiec, M., Nizanski, W., & Switonski, M. (2014). Testicular disorder of sex development in four cats with a male karyotype (38,XY; SRY-positive). Animal Reproduction Science, 151(1–2), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.10.001

Okuyama, A., Namiki, M., Koide, T., Itatani, H., Nishimoto, N., Mizutani, S., Sonoda, T., Aono, T., & Matsumoto, K. (1981). Pituitary and gonadal function in prepubertal and pubertal boys with hypospadias. Acta Endocrinologica, 98(3), 464–469. https://doi.org/10.1530/acta.0.0980464

Ostby, J., Kelce, W. R., Lambright, C., Wolf, C. J., Mann, P., & Gray, L. E. (1999). The fungicide procymidone alters sexual differentiation in the male rat by acting as an androgen-receptor antagonist in vivo and in vitro. Toxicology and Industrial Health, 15(1–2), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/074823379901500108

Ostby J, Monosson E, Kelce WR, & Gray, L. J. (1999). Environmental antiandrogens: Low doses of the fungicide vinclozolin alter sexual differentiation of the male rat. Toxicology and Industrial Health, 15(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/074823379901500106

Pang, S., Levine, L., Stoner, E., Opitz, J., Pollack, M., Dupont, B., & New, M. (1983). Nonsalt-losing congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency with normal glomerulosa function. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 56(4), 808–818. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-56-4-808

Parks, L. G., Ostby, J. S., Lambright, C. R., Abbott, B.D., Klinefelter, G. R., Barlow, N. J., & Gray LE Jr. (2000). The Plasticizer Diethylhexyl Phthalate Induces Malformations by Decreasing Fetal Testosterone Synthesis during Sexual Differentiation in the Male Rat. Toxicological Sciences, 58(2), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/58.2.339

Perrone, L., Criscuolo, T., Sinisi, A., Graziani, M., Manzo, T., Sicuranza, R., Bellastella, A., & Faggiano, M. (1985). Male pseudohermaphroditism due to 3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-isomerase deficiency associated with atrial septal defect. Acta Endocrinologica, 110(4), 532–539. https://doi.org/10.1530/acta.0.1100532

Prahalada, S., Tarantal, A., Harris, G., Ellsworth, K., Clarke, A., Skiles, G., MacKenzie, K., Kruk, L., Ablin, D., Cukierski, M., Peter, C., vanZwieten, M., & Hendrickx, A. (1997). Effects of finasteride, a type 2 5-alpha reductase inhibitor, on fetal development in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Teratology, 55(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9926(199702)55:2%253C119::AID-TERA1%253E3.0.CO;2-Z

Rabbani, B., Mahdieh, N., Ashtiani, M. H., Setoodeh, A., & A Rabbani. (2012). In silico structural, functional and pathogenicity evaluation of a novel mutation: An overview of HSD3B2 gene mutations. Gene, 503(2), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2012.04.080

Raboch, J., Pondelickova, J., & Starka, L. (1976). Plasma testosterone values in hypopspadiacs. Andrologia, 8(3), 255–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.1976.tb02144.x

Radpour R, Rezaee M, Tavasoly A, Solati S, & Saleki A. (2007). Association of long polyglycine tracts (GGN repeats) in exon 1 of the androgen receptor gene with cryptorchidism and penile hypospadias in Iranian patients. Journal of Andrology, 28(1), 164–169. https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.106.000927

Ratan, S., Aggarwal, S., Mishra, T., Saxena, A., Yadav, S., Pandey, R., Sharma, A., & Dhanwal, D. (2012). Children with isolated hypospadias have different hormonal profile compared to those with associated anomalies. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism : JPEM, 25(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpem.2011.421

Rittmaster, R. S., & Wood, A. J. J. (1994). Finasteride. New England Journal of Medicine, 330(2), 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199401133300208

Schaufele, F., Carbonell, X., Guerbadot, M., Borngraeber, S., Chapman, M. S., Ma, A. A. K., Miner, J. N., & Diamond, M. I. (2005). The structural basis of androgen receptor activation: Intramolecular and intermolecular amino–carboxy interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(28), 9802–9807. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408819102

Schlomer, B. J., Feretti, M., Rodriguez, E. J., Blaschko, S., Cunha, G., & Baskin, L. (2013). Sexual differentiation in the male and female mouse from days 0 to 21: A detailed and novel morphometric description. The Journal of Urology, 190(4 Suppl), 1610–1617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.3198

Sharpe, R. M. (2020). Androgens and the masculinization programming window: Human-rodent differences. Biochemical Society Transactions, 48(4), 1725–1735. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20200200

Sherbet, D., Tiosano, D., Kwist, K., Hochberg, Z., & RJ Auchus. (2003). CYP17 mutation E305G causes isolated 17,20-lyase deficiency by selectively altering substrate binding. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278(49), 48563–48569. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M307586200

Simard, J., Luthy, I., Guay, J., Bélanger, A., & Labrie, F. (1986). Characteristics of interaction of the antiandrogen flutamide with the androgen receptor in various target tissues. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 44(3), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/0303-7207(86)90132-2

Sinclair, A., Cao, M., Pask, A., Baskin, L., & Cunha, G. (2017). Flutamide-induced hypospadias in rats: A critical assessment. Differentiation; Research in Biological Diversity, 94, 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diff.2016.12.001

Smith, K., Brown, P., & Barr, F. (2012). A Survey of Congenital Reproductive Abnormalities in Rams in Abattoirs in South West England. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 47(5), 740–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01952.x

Sonne, C., Dietz, R., Born, E. W., Leifsson, P. S., & Andersen, S. (2008). Is there a link between hypospadias and organochlorine exposure in East Greenland sledge dogs (Canis familiaris)? Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 69(3), 391–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.09.008

Stamper, M. A., Norton, T., Spodnick, G., Marti, J., & Loomis, M. (1999). Hypospadias in a polar bear (Ursus maritimus). Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine: Official Publication of the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians, 30(1), 141–144.

Svensson, J., Eneroth, P., Gustafsson, J., Ritzén, M., & Stenberg, A. (1979). Reduction of androstenedione by skin in vitro and serum levels of gonadotrophins and androgens in men with hypospadias. The Journal of Endocrinology, 82(3), 395–401. https://doi.org/10.1677/joe.0.0820395

Switonski, M., Dzimira, S., Aleksiewicz, R., Szczerbal, I., Nowacka-Woszuk, J., Krzeminska, P., Deska, T., & Nizanski, W. (2018). Hypospadias Is Not Rare in Dogs: Five New Cases, a Retrospective Study, and a Review of the Literature. Sexual Development : Genetics, Molecular Biology, Evolution, Endocrinology, Embryology, and Pathology of Sex Determination and Differentiation, 12(5), 244–250. https://doi.org/10.1159/000490079

van den Driesche, S., Kilcoyne, K., Wagner, I., Rebourcet, D., Boyle, A., Mitchell, R., McKinnell, C., Macpherson, S., Donat, R., Shukla, C., Jorgensen, A., Meyts, E., Skakkebaek, N., & Sharpe, R. (2017). Experimentally induced testicular dysgenesis syndrome originates in the masculinization programming window. JCI Insight, 2(6), e91204. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.91204

van den Driesche, S., Shoker, S., Inglis, F., Palermo, C., Langsch, A., & Otter, R. (2020). Systematic comparison of the male reproductive tract in fetal and adult Wistar rats exposed to DBP and DINP in utero during the masculinisation programming window. Toxicology Letters, 335, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.10.006

Wang, S., Shi, M., Zhu, D., Mathews, R., & Zheng, Z. (2018). External Genital Development, Urethra Formation, and Hypospadias Induction in Guinea Pig: A Double Zipper Model for Human Urethral Development. Urology, 113, 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.11.002

Wang, S., & Zheng, Z. (2025). Differences in Formation of Prepuce and Urethral Groove During Penile Development Between Guinea Pigs and Mice Are Controlled by Differential Expression of Shh, Fgf10 and Fgfr2. Cells, 14(5), 348. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14050348

Welsh, M., Saunders, P., Fisken, M., Scott, H., Hutchison, G., Smith, L., & Sharpe, R. (2008). Identification in rats of a programming window for reproductive tract masculinization, disruption of which leads to hypospadias and cryptorchidism. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 118(4), 1479–1490. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI34241

Willingham, E., Agras, K., Souza, A. J. de, Konijeti, R., Yucel, S., Rickie, W., Cunha, G., & Baskin, L. (2006). Steroid receptors and mammalian penile development: An unexpected role for progesterone receptor? The Journal of Urology, 176(2), 728–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.078

Wolf, C., LeBlanc, G., Ostby, J., & Gray, L. J. (2000). Characterization of the period of sensitivity of fetal male sexual development to vinclozolin. Toxicological Sciences : An Official Journal of the Society of Toxicology, 55(1), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/55.1.152

Yadav, C., Bajpai, M., Kumar, V., Datta, S., Gupta, P., Ahmed, R., & Banerjee, B. (2011). Polymorphisms in the P450 c17 (17-hydroxylase/17, 20-Lyase) gene: Association with estradiol and testosterone concentration in hypospadias. Urology, 78(4), 902–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.021

Yu, X., Nassar, N., Mastroiacovo, P., Canfield, M., Groisman, B., Bermejo-Sánchez, E., Ritvanen, A., Kiuru-Kuhlefelt, S., Benavides, A., Sipek, A., Pierini, A., Bianchi, F., Källén, K., Gatt, M., Morgan, M., Tucker, D., Canessa, M. A., Gajardo, R., Mutchinick, O. M., … Agopian, A. J. (2019). Hypospadias Prevalence and Trends in International Birth Defect Surveillance Systems, 1980-2010. European Urology, 76(4), 482–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.06.027

Yucel, S., Liu, W., Cordero, D., Donjacour, A., Cunha, G., & Baskin, L. (2004). Anatomical studies of the fibroblast growth factor-10 mutant, Sonic Hedge Hog mutant and androgen receptor mutant mouse genital tubercle. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 545, 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8995-6_8

Zheng, Z., Armfield, B., & Cohn, M. (2015). Timing of androgen receptor disruption and estrogen exposure underlies a spectrum of congenital penile anomalies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(52), E7194-203. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515981112