This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
Relationship: 2009
Title
Increase, ROS leads to Increase, Oxidative Stress
Upstream event
Downstream event
Key Event Relationship Overview
AOPs Referencing Relationship
Taxonomic Applicability
Sex Applicability
| Sex | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Unspecific | High |
Life Stage Applicability
| Term | Evidence |
|---|---|
| All life stages | High |
Key Event Relationship Description
This KER describes the causal and predictive relationship by which an increase in reactive oxygen species leads to oxidative stress. ROS include superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical and secondary oxygen-derived reactive products. At low or transient levels, ROS can participate in normal cell signaling. However, when ROS production, flux or local concentration exceeds the capacity of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defenses, the redox balance of the biological system shifts toward an oxidizing state, producing oxidative stress (Schieber and Chandel, 2014; Sies et al., 2017).
The downstream KE, oxidative stress, is not identical to increased ROS. Rather, it represents a systems-level imbalance between pro-oxidant pressure and antioxidant or repair capacity. The KER therefore depends not only on the magnitude of ROS increase, but also on the duration, localization and chemical identity of the ROS, the capacity of scavenging systems such as glutathione, superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidases, and the ability of the cell or organism to activate adaptive redox responses such as NRF2 signaling (Halliwell and Gutteridge, 2015; Griendling et al., 2016; Sies et al., 2017).
Within the ROS-growth AOP network, Relationship 2009 functions as a shared upstream KER. It connects the early measurable perturbation of increased ROS to the central hub event of oxidative stress, from which downstream AOP branches proceed through oxidative DNA damage, lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, mitochondrial dysfunction, ATP depletion, altered cell proliferation, cell injury/death and decreased growth. This KER should remain modular and stressor-agnostic; stressor-specific mechanisms of ROS generation should be described in MIE or stressor sections where appropriate.
Evidence Collection Strategy
Evidence for this KER was assembled from three complementary sources. First, existing AOP-Wiki content was reviewed, including the current Relationship 2009 page and the corresponding KE pages for Event 1115 and Event 1392. These pages define the upstream and downstream events and document existing applicability and evidence summaries (AOP-Wiki, 2026a, 2026b, 2026c). Second, the ROS-growth literature review and data-mining exercise was used to identify studies in which ROS and oxidative stress or antioxidant-response endpoints were measured in the same biological system following exposure to relevant stressors. Third, targeted searches of mechanistic reviews and primary studies were used to support biological plausibility, empirical concordance and domain-of-applicability statements.
The evidence search strategy followed the AI-human hybrid workflow used for the ROS-growth AOPN. Search terms were developed for the upstream and downstream KEs, including “reactive oxygen species”, “ROS”, “oxidative stress”, “antioxidant enzyme”, “superoxide dismutase”, “catalase”, “glutathione peroxidase”, “glutathione”, “Nrf2”, “redox imbalance”, and representative stressor terms such as paraquat, hydrogen peroxide, copper, cadmium, chlorothalonil, radiation, hypoxia/reoxygenation and pathogen infection. AOP-helpFinder and targeted database searches were used to identify candidate studies, and ChatGPT (OpenAI, San Francisco, CA, USA)-assisted screening was used only for preliminary prioritization and metadata extraction. Final inclusion, interpretation and weight-of-evidence calls were made by expert review of the original sources.
Studies were prioritized when they measured both upstream and downstream events, reported dose or concentration and exposure duration, used biologically interpretable oxidative stress endpoints, and provided information relevant to dose-response, temporal or incidence concordance. Endpoints considered supportive of the downstream KE included antioxidant enzyme induction or depletion, GSH/GSSG changes, NRF2/ARE pathway activation, lipid peroxidation, and broader redox imbalance. Direct ROS measurements were given greater weight than studies in which ROS production was inferred solely from the stressor mode of action.
Evidence Supporting this KER
Biological Plausibility
Biological plausibility of Relationship 2009 is high. ROS are produced endogenously by mitochondrial electron transport, oxidase enzymes, peroxisomal reactions, photosynthetic electron transport and immune-cell oxidant systems, and they may also be generated by redox-cycling chemicals, metals, radiation and other stressors (Bedard and Krause, 2007; Murphy, 2009; Halliwell and Gutteridge, 2015). Oxidative stress is defined as a disturbance in the balance between oxidants and antioxidants in favor of oxidants, leading to disruption of redox signaling and/or molecular damage (Sies et al., 2017). Therefore, a sufficient increase in ROS has a direct mechanistic basis for causing oxidative stress when antioxidant and repair capacity are exceeded.
This relationship is also strongly supported by the known biology of antioxidant defenses. Superoxide dismutases convert superoxide to hydrogen peroxide; catalase, glutathione peroxidases and peroxiredoxins reduce hydrogen peroxide and organic peroxides; and glutathione and thioredoxin systems maintain protein thiol redox balance. Increased ROS can consume these defenses, oxidize redox-sensitive proteins, activate NRF2-dependent antioxidant response pathways, and produce oxidative modification of lipids, proteins and nucleic acids (Schieber and Chandel, 2014; Griendling et al., 2016; Sies et al., 2017).
Empirical Evidence
Empirical support for this KER is high. Numerous studies across taxa and stressor classes demonstrate concordant increases in ROS or ROS-generating conditions and oxidative stress endpoints. The strongest evidence comes from studies measuring both ROS and antioxidant-response or oxidative-stress biomarkers in the same biological system. Several examples from the ROS-growth concordance table are summarized below.
|
Biological system |
Stressor |
Exposure |
Evidence for KE1115 (ROS increase) |
Evidence for KE1392 (oxidative stress increase) |
Concordance interpretation |
Reference |
|
Chlorella vulgaris |
Paraquat |
24 h; 0-1.0 uM |
DCFH-DA fluorescence increased; LOEC for ROS approximately 0.5 uM paraquat. |
SOD, POD and CAT activities increased at similar concentrations; antioxidant enzymes were approximately 3-5-fold above control at 0.5 uM. |
Dose concordance supports ROS increase leading to oxidative stress in a photosynthetic eukaryote. |
Qian et al. (2009) |
|
Daphnia magna |
Paraquat |
48 h; 0.01-10 uM |
ROS induction threshold reported around 0.1 uM paraquat. |
SOD, CAT and GPx induction observed around 0.5 uM; TBARS increased around 1 uM. |
ROS occurs at lower or similar concentrations than antioxidant and damage markers, supporting dose concordance. |
Barata et al. (2005) |
|
Trachinotus ovatus |
Streptococcus agalactiae infection |
0-120 h; 2 x 10^7 CFU/fish |
ROS increased early, with maximum response around 6 h. |
Antioxidant enzyme activities and antioxidant gene expression changed following the ROS response. |
Temporal concordance supports ROS preceding redox-response activation during pathogen-induced oxidative stress. |
Gao et al. (2022) |
|
Mus musculus |
Copper sulfate |
42 days; 0-40 mg/kg bw |
ROS increased at the lowest tested dose by day 42. |
Antioxidant markers including SOD, GSH-related responses and oxidative stress/inflammatory indicators changed with exposure. |
Concordant ROS and antioxidant-response changes support the relationship in mammals. |
Jian et al. (2020) |
|
Marine bivalves |
Chlorothalonil |
96 h; 0.1-10 ug/L |
Stressor is thiol-reactive and associated with oxidative challenge; direct ROS was not the primary endpoint. |
SOD, CAT and GPx activity changes and MDA/TBARS increases occurred in gill tissues. |
Supports downstream oxidative stress following a stressor known to disturb redox balance; direct ROS evidence is weaker than in rows with ROS measurement. |
Haque et al. (2019) |
|
Mya arenaria |
Cyclic hypoxia/reoxygenation |
3 weeks; repeated low oxygen exposure |
Hypoxia/reoxygenation is a recognized ROS-generating condition in mitochondria. |
Mitochondrial proton leak and oxidative stress-related bioenergetic changes were elevated under cyclic hypoxia. |
Supports environmental modulation of ROS-associated oxidative stress and mitochondrial response. |
Ouillon et al. (2021) |
Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
The main uncertainties relate to measurement specificity and context dependence. ROS are chemically diverse and often short-lived, so different assays may detect different ROS species or generalized oxidant-dependent probe oxidation rather than a single ROS concentration. DCFH-DA and related probes are useful screening tools but can be influenced by peroxidases, metals, light, probe loading and cellular esterase activity (Wardman, 2007; Kalyanaraman et al., 2012). Consequently, apparent ROS increases must be interpreted with assay limitations in mind.
A second uncertainty is that ROS increases are not always adverse. Transient or localized ROS signals may activate adaptive stress responses and restore redox homeostasis without producing sustained oxidative stress. Conversely, oxidative stress may be inferred from antioxidant enzyme induction or oxidative damage biomarkers in studies where ROS were not directly measured. These cases support the KER less strongly than studies with direct, temporally resolved ROS measurements. Differences among taxa, life stages, tissues, exposure durations and antioxidant capacities may alter the threshold at which increased ROS becomes oxidative stress.
Known modulating factors
|
Modulating factor |
Details |
Effect on the KER |
Supporting evidence |
|
Antioxidant capacity |
Levels and activities of GSH, SOD, CAT, GPx, peroxiredoxins, thioredoxin systems and antioxidant vitamins. |
Higher antioxidant capacity buffers ROS and raises the threshold for oxidative stress; depleted or impaired antioxidant systems lower the threshold. |
Halliwell and Gutteridge (2015); Sies et al. (2017). |
|
NRF2/ARE pathway activation |
Induction of antioxidant and detoxification genes through NRF2-dependent signaling. |
Adaptive NRF2 activation may reduce progression from increased ROS to sustained oxidative stress, but strong NRF2 activation can also serve as evidence that ROS has perturbed redox homeostasis. |
Schieber and Chandel (2014); Sies et al. (2017); AOP-Wiki (2026c). |
|
Subcellular localization of ROS |
Mitochondria, chloroplasts, peroxisomes, membranes, nuclei and phagosomes differ in ROS production and local antioxidant buffering. |
Localized ROS production can cause oxidative stress in a specific compartment even when whole-cell ROS measurements are modest. |
Murphy (2009); Griendling et al. (2016). |
|
Exposure duration and recovery time |
Acute pulses, chronic low-level exposure and repeated stress can produce different redox outcomes. |
Short pulses may be buffered or adaptive; sustained or repeated ROS elevations increase the probability of oxidative stress. |
Sies et al. (2017); Ouillon et al. (2021). |
|
Oxygen availability and hypoxia/reoxygenation |
Oxygen tension affects mitochondrial electron transport and ROS formation. |
Reoxygenation after hypoxia can increase mitochondrial ROS and enhance oxidative stress. |
Ouillon et al. (2021). |
|
Temperature and metabolic rate |
Temperature and metabolic demand alter oxygen flux, mitochondrial activity and antioxidant capacity. |
Higher metabolic activity or thermal stress can increase ROS formation and shift the balance toward oxidative stress. |
Tseng et al. (2011). |
|
Stressor chemistry |
Redox cycling, metal-catalyzed reactions, radiation and mitochondrial inhibition generate ROS by different mechanisms. |
Stressor type influences the ROS species, localization, time course and threshold for oxidative stress. |
Bedard and Krause (2007); Murphy (2009); Qian et al. (2009); Gao et al. (2022). |
Quantitative Understanding of the Linkage
Quantitative understanding of this KER is low to moderate. The qualitative relationship is well established: oxidative stress occurs when ROS production or flux exceeds antioxidant and repair capacity. However, a universal quantitative threshold for ROS leading to oxidative stress cannot be defined because the relationship depends strongly on ROS species, subcellular localization, measurement method, antioxidant capacity, exposure duration, organism, cell type and co-stressors (Kalyanaraman et al., 2012; Griendling et al., 2016; Sies et al., 2017).
Response-response Relationship
Response-response information is available in specific systems. For example, in Chlorella vulgaris exposed to paraquat, ROS and antioxidant enzyme responses were observed at approximately 0.5 uM after 24 h, indicating local dose concordance between the upstream and downstream events (Qian et al., 2009). In Daphnia magna exposed to paraquat, ROS induction was reported at lower concentrations than antioxidant enzyme and TBARS responses, supporting an expected dose sequence in which ROS increases precede oxidative stress endpoints (Barata et al., 2005). These examples provide semi-quantitative support, but they cannot be generalized across all taxa or stressors.
Time-scale
The time scale of the KER can range from minutes to hours for ROS-sensitive signaling and antioxidant pathway activation, and from hours to days for measurable changes in antioxidant enzyme activities, glutathione status or oxidative damage biomarkers. In pathogen-exposed golden pompano, ROS increased early, followed by antioxidant enzyme and gene expression responses over subsequent hours to days, supporting temporal concordance (Gao et al., 2022).
Known Feedforward/Feedback loops influencing this KER
Known feedback and feedforward mechanisms influence the linkage. NRF2-dependent antioxidant responses can reduce ROS and restore homeostasis, whereas mitochondrial dysfunction, lipid peroxidation, inflammation and redox-sensitive signaling can amplify ROS generation and sustain oxidative stress. These feedbacks make the KER dynamic and nonlinear, particularly under chronic exposure or repeated stress.
Domain of Applicability
This KER is broadly applicable to aerobic eukaryotic systems in which ROS production and antioxidant buffering can be measured. The current AOP-Wiki relationship page identifies human, mouse and rat with high evidence, but the ROS-growth evidence base supports extension to algae, fish, crustaceans, mollusks and other organisms relevant to environmental toxicology (AOP-Wiki, 2026a). The relationship is expected to be conserved because it is based on redox chemistry and conserved antioxidant-defense systems rather than on a taxon-specific receptor or signaling pathway.
The applicability domain should nevertheless be bounded by biological context and measurement feasibility. This KER is most relevant when the upstream KE is a measurable increase in ROS and the downstream KE is a measurable redox imbalance or antioxidant-response state rather than a distal oxidative damage endpoint alone. In organisms or compartments where ROS cannot be measured directly, evidence may rely on antioxidant-response or oxidative damage biomarkers, but these should be interpreted as indirect support. Applicability is strongest when ROS and oxidative stress endpoints are measured in the same system under the same exposure conditions.
References
AOP-Wiki. 2026a. Relationship 2009: Increase, ROS leads to Increase, Oxidative stress. AOP-Wiki. Available at: https://aopwiki.org/relationships/2009. Accessed 14 May 2026.
AOP-Wiki. 2026b. Event 1115: Increase, Reactive oxygen species. AOP-Wiki. Available at: https://aopwiki.org/events/1115. Accessed 14 May 2026.
AOP-Wiki. 2026c. Event 1392: Increase, Oxidative stress. AOP-Wiki. Available at: https://aopwiki.org/events/1392. Accessed 14 May 2026.
Barata C, Varo I, Navarro JC, Arun S, Porte C. 2005. Antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in the freshwater cladoceran Daphnia magna exposed to redox cycling compounds. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology 140(2):175-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2005.01.013.
Bedard K, Krause KH. 2007. The NOX family of ROS-generating NADPH oxidases: physiology and pathophysiology. Physiological Reviews 87(1):245-313. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00044.2005.
Dickinson BC, Chang CJ. 2011. Chemistry and biology of reactive oxygen species in signaling or stress responses. Nature Chemical Biology 7(8):504-511. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.607.
Esperanza M, Cid A, Herrero C, Rioboo C. 2015. Acute effects of a prooxidant herbicide on the microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: screening cytotoxicity and genotoxicity endpoints. Aquatic Toxicology 165:210-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2015.06.004.
Gao J, Liu M, Guo H, Zhu K, Liu B, Liu B, Zhang N, Sun X, Jiang S, Zhang D. 2022. ROS induced by Streptococcus agalactiae activate inflammatory responses via the TNF-alpha/NF-kappaB signaling pathway in golden pompano Trachinotus ovatus (Linnaeus, 1758). Antioxidants 11(9):1809. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11091809.
Griendling KK, Touyz RM, Zweier JL, Dikalov S, Chilian W, Chen YR, Harrison DG, Bhatnagar A. 2016. Measurement of reactive oxygen species, reactive nitrogen species, and redox-dependent signaling in the cardiovascular system: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation Research 119(5):e39-e75. https://doi.org/10.1161/RES.0000000000000110.
Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC. 2015. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haque MN, Eom HJ, Nam SE, Shin YK, Rhee JS. 2019. Chlorothalonil induces oxidative stress and reduces enzymatic activities of Na+/K+-ATPase and acetylcholinesterase in gill tissues of marine bivalves. PLoS ONE 14(4):e0214236. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214236.
Jian Z, Guo H, Liu H, Cui H, Fang J, Zuo Z, Deng J, Li Y, Wang X, Zhao L. 2020. Oxidative stress, apoptosis and inflammatory responses involved in copper-induced pulmonary toxicity in mice. Aging 12(17):16867-16886. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.103585.
Kalyanaraman B, Darley-Usmar V, Davies KJA, Dennery PA, Forman HJ, Grisham MB, Mann GE, Moore K, Roberts LJ II, Ischiropoulos H. 2012. Measuring reactive oxygen and nitrogen species with fluorescent probes: challenges and limitations. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 52(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.09.030.
Murphy MP. 2009. How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species. Biochemical Journal 417(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20081386.
Ouillon N, Sokolov EP, Otto S, Rehder G, Sokolova IM. 2021. Effects of variable oxygen regimes on mitochondrial bioenergetics and reactive oxygen species production in a marine bivalve, Mya arenaria. Journal of Experimental Biology 224(4):jeb237156. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.237156.
Pan YX, Luo Z, Zhuo MQ, Wei CC, Chen GH, Song YF. 2018. Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction mediated Cd-induced hepatic lipid accumulation in zebrafish Danio rerio. Aquatic Toxicology 199:12-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2018.03.017.
Qian H, Chen W, Sun L, Jin Y, Liu W, Fu Z. 2009. Inhibitory effects of paraquat on photosynthesis and the response to oxidative stress in Chlorella vulgaris. Ecotoxicology 18(5):537-543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-009-0311-8.
Schieber M, Chandel NS. 2014. ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress. Current Biology 24(10):R453-R462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.034.
Sies H, Berndt C, Jones DP. 2017. Oxidative stress. Annual Review of Biochemistry 86:715-748. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-045037.
Tseng YC, Chen RD, Lucassen M, Schmidt MM, Dringen R, Abele D, Hwang PP. 2011. Exploring uncoupling proteins and antioxidant mechanisms under acute cold exposure in brains of fish. PLoS ONE 6(3):e18180. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018180.
Wardman P. 2007. Fluorescent and luminescent probes for measurement of oxidative and nitrosative species in cells and tissues: progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 43(7):995-1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.06.026.