AOP-Wiki

AOP ID and Title:

AOP 571: 5α-reductase inhibition leading to hypospadias in male (mammalian) offspring
Short Title: 5α-reductase inhibition leading to hypospadias

Graphical Representation

Authors

Emilie Elmelund; National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, DK-2800, Denmark

Monica K. Draskau; National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, DK-2800, Denmark

Henrik Holbech; Department of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5230, Odense M, Denmark

Terje Svingen; National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, DK-2800, Denmark

Status

Author status OECD status OECD project SAAOP status
Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite

Abstract

This AOP links in utero inhibition of 5α-reductase with hypospadias in male offspring. Hypospadias is a common reproductive disorder with a prevalence of up to ~1/125 newborn boys (Leunbach et al., 2025; Paulozzi, 1999). Developmental exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals is suspected to contribute to some cases of hypospadias (Mattiske & Pask, 2021). Hypospadias can be indicative of fetal disruptions to male reproductive development, and is associated with short anogenital distance and cryptorchidism (Skakkebaek et al., 2016). Thus, hypospadias is included as an endpoint in OECD test guidelines (TG) for developmental and reproductive toxicity (TG 414, 416, 421/422, and 443; (OECD, 2016b, 2016a, 2018a, 2018b, 2021)), as both a measurement of adverse reproductive effects and a direct clinical adverse outcome.

5α-reductase is an enzyme that converts testosterone to dihydrotestosterone (DHT). In normal male reproductive development, DHT activates the androgen receptor (AR) in peripheral reproductive tissues to drive differentiation of the male phenotype, including development of the penis. While testosterone also acts directly at the AR, DHT is 5-10 times more potent and in peripheral tissues conversion to DHT is necessary for proper masculinization (Amato et al., 2022; Davey & Grossmann, 2016). This AOP delineates the evidence that inhibition of 5α-reductase reduces DHT levels and consequently AR activation, thereby disrupting penis development and causing hypospadias. The AOP is supported by in vitro experiments upstream of AR activation and by in vivo and human case studies downstream of AR activation. Downstream of a reduction in AR activation, the molecular mechanisms of hypospadias development are not fully delineated, highlighting a knowledge gap in this AOP. Thus, the AOP has potential for inclusion of additional KEs and elaboration of molecular causality links, once these are established. Given that hypospadias is both a clinical and toxicological endpoint, this AOP is considered highly relevant in a regulatory context.

Background

This AOP is a part of an AOP network for reduced androgen receptor activation causing hypospadias in male offspring. The other AOPs in this network are AOP-477 (‘Androgen receptor antagonism leading to hypospadias in male (mammalian) offspring’), and AOP-570 (‘Decreased testosterone synthesis leading to hypospadias in male (mammalian) offspring’). The purpose of the AOP network is to organize the well-established evidence for anti-androgenic mechanisms-of-action leading to hypospadias, thus informing predictive toxicology and identifying knowledge gaps for investigation and method development.

This work received funding from the European Food and Safety Authority (EFSA) under Grant agreement no. GP/EFSA/PREV/2022/01 and from the Danish Environmental Protection Agency under the Danish Center for Endocrine Disrupters (CeHoS).

Summary of the AOP

Events

Molecular Initiating Events (MIE), Key Events (KE), Adverse Outcomes (AO)

Sequence Type Event ID Title Short name
MIE 1617 Inhibition, 5α-reductase Inhibition, 5α-reductase
KE 1613 Decrease, dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels Decrease, DHT level
KE 1614 Decrease, androgen receptor activation Decrease, AR activation
KE 286 Altered, Transcription of genes by the androgen receptor Altered, Transcription of genes by the AR
AO 2082 Hypospadias, increased Hypospadias

Key Event Relationships

Upstream Event Relationship Type Downstream Event Evidence Quantitative Understanding
Inhibition, 5α-reductase adjacent Decrease, dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels High
Decrease, dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels adjacent Decrease, androgen receptor activation High
Decrease, androgen receptor activation adjacent Altered, Transcription of genes by the androgen receptor High
Decrease, androgen receptor activation non-adjacent Hypospadias, increased High

Stressors

Name Evidence
Finasteride

Overall Assessment of the AOP

Domain of Applicability

Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
Foetal High
Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
human Homo sapiens High NCBI
rat Rattus norvegicus High NCBI
mouse Mus musculus Moderate NCBI
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Male High

Although the upstream part of the AOPN has a broad applicability domain, the overall AOPN is considered only applicable to male mammals during fetal life, restricted by the applicability of KER-2828 (‘Decrease, AR activation leads to hypospadias’). The term hypospadias is mainly used for describing malformation of the male, and not female, external genitalia. Some studies refer to hypospadias in females, but these have not been reported to be caused by exposure to 5α-reductase inhibitors, and the mechanisms behind these malformations are likely different from the mechanisms in males (Greene, 1937; Stewart et al., 2018). The genital tubercle is programmed by androgens to differentiate into a penis in fetal life in the masculinization programming window, followed by the morphologic differentiation (Welsh et al., 2008). In humans, hypospadias is diagnosed at birth and can also often be observed in rats and mice at this time point, although the rodent penis does not finish developing until a few weeks after birth (Baskin & Ebbers, 2006; Sinclair et al., 2017). The disruption to androgen programming leading to hypospadias thus take place during fetal life, but the AO is best detected postnatally. Regarding taxonomic applicability, hypospadias has mainly been identified in rodents and humans, and the evidence in this AOP is almost exclusively from these species. It is, however, biologically plausible that the AOP is applicable to other mammals as well, given the conserved role of androgens in mammalian reproductive development, and hypospadias has been observed in many domestic animal and wildlife species, albeit not coupled to 5α-reductase inhibition.

Essentiality of the Key Events

Event

Evidence

Uncertainties and inconsistencies

MIE-1617

Inhibition, 5α-reductase (high)

Biological plausibility provides strong support for the essentiality of this event, as DHT (produced by 5α-reductase) is one of the primary drivers of penis development.

In utero exposure to the 5α-reductase inhibitor finasteride can cause hypospadias in male rats (Clark et al., 1993)

Human case studies of 5α-reductase deficiency support the essentiality of this KE, as mutations in 5α-reductase can cause low DHT levels and associated hypospadias in males (Robitaille & Langlois, 2020). See also table 4 in KER-2828 listing disruptions of AR activity associated with hypospadias in humans.

In the human case studies, DHT is only measured postnatally and not in fetal life.

KE-1613

Decrease, DHT levels (moderate)

Biological plausibility provides strong support for the essentiality of this event, as DHT is a ligand of the AR and one of the primary drivers of penis development.

 

In patients with 5α-reductase deficiency, DHT levels are reduced and hypospadias are frequently observed, as listed in table 4 in KER-2828.

In the human case studies, DHT is only measured postnatally and not in fetal life, As hypospadias is a congenital malformation, it cannot be “reversed” by postnatal DHT treatment.

KE-1614

Decrease, AR activation (moderate)

Biological plausibility provides strong support for the essentiality of this event, as AR activation is critical for normal penis development.

 

Conditional or full knockout of Ar in mice results in partly or full sex-reversal of males, including a female-like urethral opening (Willingham et al., 2006; Yucel et al., 2004; Zheng et al., 2015). Human subjects with AR mutations may also have associated hypospadias (as listed in table 4 in KER-2828).

 

KE-286

Altered, transcription of genes by AR (low)

Biological plausibility provides support for the essentiality of this event. AR is a nuclear receptor and transcription factor regulating transcription of genes, and androgens, acting through AR, are essential for normal male penis development.

Known AR-responsive genes active in normal penis development have been thoroughly reviewed  (Amato et al., 2022).

There are currently no AR-responsive genes proved to be causally involved in hypospadias, and it is known that the AR can also signal through non-genomic actions (Leung & Sadar, 2017).

Event

Direct evidence

Indirect evidence

Contradictory evidence

Overall essentiality assessment

MIE 1617

***

 

 

High

KE 1613

*

*

 

Moderate

KE 1614

**

 

 

Moderate

KE 286

 

*

 

Low

 

Weight of Evidence Summary

The confidence in each of the KERs comprising the AOP are judged as high, with both high biological plausibility and high confidence in the empirical evidence. The mechanistic link between KE-286 (‘altered, transcription of genes by AR’) and AO-2082 (‘hypospadias’) is not established, but given the high confidence in the KERs including the non-adjacent KER-2828 linking to the AO, the overall confidence in the AOP is judged as high.

KER

Biological Plausibility

Empirical Evidence

Rationale

KER-1880

Inhibition, 5α-reductase leads to decrease, DHT levels

High

High (canonical)

It is well established that 5α-reductase converts testosterone to DHT.

In vitro, in vivo and human studies with 5α-reductase inhibitors have shown dose-dependent decreases in formation of DHT (Draskau et al., 2024).

KER-1935

Decrease, DHT levels leads to decrease, AR activation

High

High (canonical)

It is well established that DHT activates the AR.

Direct evidence for this KER is not possible since KE-1614 can currently not be measured and is considered an in vivo effect. Indirect evidence using proxy read-outs of AR activation, either in vitro or in vivo strongly supports the relationship (Draskau et al., 2024).

KER-2124

Decrease, AR activation leads to altered, transcription of genes by AR

High

High (canonical)

It is well established that the AR regulates gene transcription.

In vivo animal studies and human genomic profiling show tissue-specific changes to gene expression upon disruption of AR (Draskau et al., 2024).

KER-2828

Decrease, AR activation leads to hypospadias

High

High

It is well established that AR drives penis differentiation. Numerous in vivo toxicity studies and human case studies indirectly show that decreased AR activation leads to hypospadias, with few inconsistencies. The empirical evidence moderately supports dose, temporal, and incidence concordance for the KER.

Quantitative Consideration

The quantitative understanding of this AOP is judged as low.

References

Amato, C. M., Yao, H. H.-C., & Zhao, F. (2022). One Tool for Many Jobs: Divergent and Conserved Actions of Androgen Signaling in Male Internal Reproductive Tract and External Genitalia. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 13, 910964. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.910964

Baskin, L., & Ebbers, M. (2006). Hypospadias: Anatomy, etiology, and technique. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 41(3), 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.11.059

Bhasin, S., Cunningham, G. R., Hayes, F. J., Matsumoto, A. M., Snyder, P. J., Swerdloff, R. S., & Montori, V. M. (2010). Testosterone Therapy in Men with Androgen Deficiency Syndromes: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 95(6), 2536–2559. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-2354

Chamberlain, N. L., Driver, E. D., & Miesfeld, R. L. (1994). The length and location of CAG trinucleotide repeats in the androgen receptor N-terminal domain affect transactivation function. Nucleic Acids Research, 22(15), 3181–3186. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.15.3181

Clark, R. L., Anderson, C. A., Prahalada, S., Robertson, R. T., Lochry, E. A., Leonard, Y. M., Stevens, J. L., & Hoberman, A. M. (1993). Critical Developmental Periods for Effects on Male Rat Genitalia Induced by Finasteride, a 5α-Reductase Inhibitor. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 119(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1006/taap.1993.1041

Davey, R. A., & Grossmann, M. (2016). Androgen Receptor Structure, Function and Biology: From Bench to Bedside. The Clinical Biochemist. Reviews, 37(1), 3–15.

Draskau, M., Rosenmai, A., Bouftas, N., Johansson, H., Panagiotou, E., Holmer, M., Elmelund, E., Zilliacus, J., Beronius, A., Damdimopoulou, P., van Duursen, M., & Svingen, T. (2024). Aop Report: An Upstream Network for Reduced Androgen Signalling Leading to Altered Gene Expression of Ar Responsive Genes in Target Tissues. Environ Toxicol Chem, In Press.

Greene, R. R. (1937). Production of Experimental Hypospadias in the Female Rat. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, 36(4), 503–506. https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-36-9287P

Holmer, M. L., Zilliacus, J., Draskau, M. K., Hlisníková, H., Beronius, A., & Svingen, T. (2024). Methodology for developing data-rich Key Event Relationships for Adverse Outcome Pathways exemplified by linking decreased androgen receptor activity with decreased anogenital distance. Reproductive Toxicology, 128, 108662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2024.108662

Leunbach, T. L., Berglund, A., Ernst, A., Hvistendahl, G. M., Rawashdeh, Y. F., & Gravholt, C. H. (2025). Prevalence, Incidence, and Age at Diagnosis of Boys With Hypospadias: A Nationwide Population-Based Epidemiological Study. Journal of Urology, 213(3), 350–360. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004319

Leung, J. K., & Sadar, M. D. (2017). Non-Genomic Actions of the Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2017.00002

Mattiske, D. M., & Pask, A. J. (2021). Endocrine disrupting chemicals in the pathogenesis of hypospadias; developmental and toxicological perspectives. Current Research in Toxicology, 2, 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crtox.2021.03.004

OECD. (2016a). Test No. 421: Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264264380-en

OECD. (2016b). Test No. 422: Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264264403-en

OECD. (2018a). Test No. 414: Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264070820-en

OECD. (2018b). Test No. 443: Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264185371-en

OECD. (2021). Test No. 416: Two-Generation Reproduction Toxicity (Section 4).

Paulozzi, L. J. (1999). International trends in rates of hypospadias and cryptorchidism.

Robitaille, J., & Langlois, V. S. (2020). Consequences of steroid-5α-reductase deficiency and inhibition in vertebrates. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 290, 113400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2020.113400

Sinclair, A., Cao, M., Pask, A., Baskin, L., & Cunha, G. (2017). Flutamide-induced hypospadias in rats: A critical assessment. Differentiation; Research in Biological Diversity, 94, 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diff.2016.12.001

Skakkebaek, N. E., Rajpert-De Meyts, E., Louis, G. M. B., Toppari, J., Andersson, A.-M., Eisenberg, M. L., Jensen, T. K., Jorgensen, N., Swan, S. H., Sapra, K. J., Ziebe, S., Priskorn, L., & Juul, A. (2016). Male Reproductive Disorders And Fertility Trends: Influences Of Environement And Genetic susceptibility. PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 96(1), 55–97. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00017.2015

Stewart, M. K., Mattiske, D. M., & Pask, A. J. (2018). In utero exposure to both high- and low-dose diethylstilbestrol disrupts mouse genital tubercle development†. Biology of Reproduction, 99(6), 1184–1193. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioy142

Svingen, T., Villeneuve, D. L., Knapen, D., Panagiotou, E. M., Draskau, M. K., Damdimopoulou, P., & O’Brien, J. M. (2021). A Pragmatic Approach to Adverse Outcome Pathway Development and Evaluation. Toxicological Sciences, 184(2), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfab113

Tut, T. G., Ghadessy, F. J., Trifiro, M. A., Pinsky, L., & Yong, E. L. (1997). Long Polyglutamine Tracts in the Androgen Receptor Are Associated with Reduced Trans -Activation, Impaired Sperm Production, and Male Infertility 1. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 82(11), 3777–3782. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.82.11.4385

Welsh, M., Saunders, P. T. K., Fisken, M., Scott, H. M., Hutchison, G. R., Smith, L. B., & Sharpe, R. M. (2008). Identification in rats of a programming window for reproductive tract masculinization, disruption of which leads to hypospadias and cryptorchidism. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 118(4), 1479–1490. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI34241

Willingham, E., Agras, K., Souza, A. J. de, Konijeti, R., Yucel, S., Rickie, W., Cunha, G., & Baskin, L. (2006). Steroid receptors and mammalian penile development: An unexpected role for progesterone receptor? The Journal of Urology, 176(2), 728–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.078

Yucel, S., Liu, W., Cordero, D., Donjacour, A., Cunha, G., & Baskin, L. (2004). Anatomical studies of the fibroblast growth factor-10 mutant, Sonic Hedge Hog mutant and androgen receptor mutant mouse genital tubercle. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 545, 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8995-6_8

Zheng, Z., Armfield, B., & Cohn, M. (2015). Timing of androgen receptor disruption and estrogen exposure underlies a spectrum of congenital penile anomalies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(52), E7194-203. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515981112

 

Appendix 1

List of MIEs in this AOP

Event: 1617: Inhibition, 5α-reductase

Short Name: Inhibition, 5α-reductase

AOPs Including This Key Event

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Molecular

Cell term

Cell term
eukaryotic cell

Domain of Applicability

Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
mammals mammals High NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
During development and at adulthood High
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Mixed High

This KE is applicable to both sexes, across developmental stages into adulthood, in many different tissues and across mammalian taxa. It is, however, acknowledged that this KE most likely has a much broader domain of applicability extending to non-mammalian vertebrates. AOP developers are encouraged to add additional relevant knowledge to expand on the applicability to also include other vertebrates.

Essentially the reaction performed by the isozymes is the same, but the enzyme is differentially expressed in the body. 5α-reductase type 1 is mainly linked to the production of neurosteroids, 5α-reductase type 2 is mainly involved in production of 5α-DHT, whereas 5α-reductase type 3 is involved in N-glycosylation (Robitaille & Langlois, 2020).

The expression profile of the three 5α-reductase isoforms depends on the developmental stage, the tissue of interest, and the disease state of the tissue. The enzymes have been identified in, for instance, non-genital and genital skin, scalp, prostate, liver, seminal vesicle, epididymis, testis, ovary, kidney, exocrine pancreas, and brain (Azzouni, 2012, Uhlen 2015).

5α-reductase is well-conserved, all primary species in Eukaryota contain all three isoforms (from plant, amoeba, yeast to vertebrates) (Azzouni, 2012) and the enzymes are expressed in both males and females (Langlois, 2010, Uhlen 2015).

Key Event Description

This KE describes the inhibition of 5α-reductases (3-oxo-5α-steroid 4-dehydrogenases). These enzymes are widely expressed in tissues of both sexes and responsible for conversion of steroid hormones.

There are three isozymes: 5α-reductase type 1, 2, and 3. The substrates for 5α-reductases are 3-oxo (3-keto), Δ4,5 C19/C21 steroids such as testosterone, progesterone, androstenedione, epi-testosterone, cortisol, aldosterone, and deoxycorticosterone. The enzymatic reaction leads to an irreversible breakage of the double bond between carbon 4 and 5 and subsequent insertion of a hydride anion at carbon 5 and insertion of a proton at carbon 4. The reaction is aided by the cofactor NADPH. The substrate affinity and reaction velocity differ depending on the combination of substrate and enzyme isoform, for instance 5α-reductase type 2 has a higher substrate affinity for testosterone than the type 1 isoform of the enzyme, and the enzymatic reaction occurs at a higher velocity under optimal conditions. Likewise, inhibitors of 5α-reductase may exhibit differential effects depending on isoforms (Azzouni et al., 2012).

How it is Measured or Detected

There is currently (as of 2023) no OECD test guideline for the measurement of 5α-reductase inhibition.

Assessing the ability of chemicals to inhibit the activity of 5α-reductase is challenging, but has been assessed using transfected cell lines. This has been demonstrated in HEK-293 cells stably transfected with human 5α-reductase type 1, 2, and 3 (Yamana et al., 2010), in CHO cells stably transfected with human 5α-reductase type 1 and 2 (Thigpens et al., 1993), and COS cells transfected with human and rat 5α-reductase with unspecified isoforms (Andersson & Russell, 1990). The transfected cells are typically used as intact cells or cell homogenates. Further, 5α-reductase 1 and 2 has been successfully expressed and isolated from Escherichia coli with subsequent functionality allowing for examination of enzyme inhibition (Peng et al., 2020)The availability of the stably transfected cell lines and the isolated enzymes to the scientific community is unknown.

The output of the above methods could be decreased dihydrotestosterone (DHT) with increasing test chemical concentrations. Other substrates exist for the different isoforms that could be used to assess the enzymatic inhibition (Peng et al., 2020). The use of radiolabeled steroids has historic and continued use for 5α-reductase inhibition examination (Andersson & Russell, 1990; Peng et al., 2020; Thigpens et al., 1993; Yamana et al., 2010); however, alternative methods are available, such as conventional ELISA kits or advanced analytical methods such as liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).

References

Andersson, S., & Russell, D. W. (1990). Structural and biochemical properties of cloned and expressed human and rat steroid 5a-reductases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87, 3640–3644. https://www.pnas.org

Azzouni, F., Godoy, A., Li, Y., & Mohler, J. (2012). The 5 alpha-reductase isozyme family: A review of basic biology and their role in human diseases. In Advances in Urology. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/530121

Peng, H. M., Valentin-Goyco, J., Im, S. C., Han, B., Liu, J., Qiao, J., & Auchus, R. J. (2020). Expression in escherichia coli, purification, and functional reconstitution of human steroid 5α-reductases. Endocrinology (United States), 161(8), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1210/ENDOCR/BQAA117

Robitaille, J., & Langlois, V. S. (2020). Consequences of steroid-5α-reductase deficiency and inhibition in vertebrates. In General and Comparative Endocrinology (Vol. 290). Academic Press Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2020.113400

Thigpens, A. E., Cala, K. M., & Russell, D. W. (1993). Characterization of Chinese Hamster Ovary Cell Lines Expressing Human Steroid 5a-Reductase Isozymes. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 268(23), 17404–17412.

Yamana, K., Fernand, L., Luu-The, V., & Luu-The, V. (2010). Human type 3 5α-reductase is expressed in peripheral tissues at higher levels than types 1 and 2 and its activity is potently inhibited by finasteride and dutasteride. Hormone Molecular Biology and Clinical Investigation, 2(3), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1515/HMBCI.2010.035

List of Key Events in the AOP

Event: 1613: Decrease, dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels

Short Name: Decrease, DHT level

Key Event Component

Process Object Action
hormone biosynthetic process 17beta-Hydroxy-2-oxa-5alpha-androstan-3-one decreased

AOPs Including This Key Event

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Tissue

Domain of Applicability

Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
mammals mammals High NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
All life stages Moderate
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Mixed High

This KE is applicable to both sexes, across developmental stages and adulthood, in many different tissues and across mammals.

In both humans and rodents, DHT is important for the in utero differentiation and growth of the prostate and male external genitalia (Azzouni et al., 2012; Gerald & Raj, 2022). Besides its critical role in development, DHT also induces growth of facial and body hair during puberty in humans (Azzouni et al., 2012).

In mammals, the role of DHT in females is less established (Swerdloff et al., 2017), however studies suggest that androgens are important in e.g. bone metabolism and growth, as well as female reproduction from follicle development to parturition (Hammes & Levin, 2019).

It is, however, acknowledged that this KE most likely has a much broader domain of applicability extending to non-mammalian vertebrates. AOP developers are encouraged to add additional relevant knowledge to expand on the applicability to also include other vertebrates.

Key Event Description

Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) is an endogenous steroid hormone and a potent androgen. The level of DHT in tissue or blood is dependent on several factors, such as the synthesis, uptake/release, metabolism, and elimination from the system, which again can be dependent on biological compartment and developmental stage.

DHT is primarily synthesized from testosterone (T) via the irreversible enzymatic reaction facilitated by 5α-Reductases (5α-REDs) (Swerdloff et al., 2017). Different isoforms of this enzyme are differentially expressed in specific tissues (e.g. prostate, skin, liver, and hair follicles) at different developmental stages, and depending on disease status (Azzouni et al., 2012; Uhlén et al., 2015), which ultimately affects the local production of DHT.

An alternative (“backdoor”) pathway , exists for DHT formation that is independent of T and androstenedione as precursors. While first discovered in marsupials, the physiological importance of this pathway has now also been established in other mammals including humans (Renfree and Shaw, 2023). This pathway relies on the conversion of progesterone (P) or 17-OH-P to androsterone and then androstanediol through several enzymatic reactions and finally, the conversion of androstanediol into DHT probably by HSD17B6 (Miller & Auchus, 2019; Naamneh Elzenaty et al., 2022). The “backdoor” synthesis pathway is a result of an interplay between placenta, adrenal gland, and liver during fetal life (Miller & Auchus, 2019).

The conversion of T to DHT by 5α-RED in peripheral tissue is mainly responsible for the circulating levels of DHT, though some tissues express enzymes needed for further metabolism of DHT consequently leading to little release and contribution to circulating levels (Swerdloff et al.).

The initial conversion of DHT into inactive steroids is primarily through 3α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3α-HSD) and 3β-HSD in liver, intestine, skin, and androgen-sensitive tissues. The subsequent conjugation is mainly mediated by uridine 5´-diphospho (UDP)-glucuronyltransferase 2 (UGT2) leading to biliary and urinary elimination from the system. Conjugation also occurs locally to control levels of highly potent androgens (Swerdloff et al., 2017).

Disruption of any of the aforementioned processes may lead to decreased DHT levels, either systemically or at tissue level.

How it is Measured or Detected

Several methods exist for DHT identification and quantification, such as conventional immunoassay methods (ELISA or RIA) and advanced analytical methods as liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The methods can have differences in detection and quantification limits, which should be considered depending on the DHT levels in the sample of interest. Further, the origin of the sample (e.g. cell culture, tissue, or blood) will have implications for the sample preparation.

Conventional immunoassays have limitations in that they can overestimate the levels of DHT compared to levels determined by gas chromatography mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (Hsing et al., 2007; Shiraishi et al., 2008). This overestimation may be explained by lack of specificity of the DHT antibody used in the RIA and cross-reactivity with T in samples (Swerdloff et al., 2017).

Test guideline no. 456 (OECD 2023) uses a cell line, NCI-H295, capable of producing DHT at low levels. The test guideline is not validated for this hormone. Measurement of DHT levels in these cells require low detection and quantification limits. Any effect on DHT can be a result of many upstream molecular events that are specific for the NCI-H295 cells, and which may differ in other models for steroidogenesis.

References

Azzouni, F., Godoy, A., Li, Y., & Mohler, J. (2012). The 5 alpha-reductase isozyme family: A review of basic biology and their role in human diseases. In Advances in Urology. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/530121

Gerald, T., & Raj, G. (2022). Testosterone and the Androgen Receptor. In Urologic Clinics of North America (Vol. 49, Issue 4, pp. 603–614). W.B. Saunders. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2022.07.004

Hammes, S. R., & Levin, E. R. (2019). Impact of estrogens in males and androgens in females. In Journal of Clinical Investigation (Vol. 129, Issue 5, pp. 1818–1826). American Society for Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI125755

Hsing, A. W., Stanczyk, F. Z., Bélanger, A., Schroeder, P., Chang, L., Falk, R. T., & Fears, T. R. (2007). Reproducibility of serum sex steroid assays in men by RIA and mass spectrometry. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, 16(5), 1004–1008. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0792

Miller, W. L., & Auchus, R. J. (2019). The “backdoor pathway” of androgen synthesis in human male sexual development. PLoS Biology, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000198

Naamneh Elzenaty, R., du Toit, T., & Flück, C. E. (2022). Basics of androgen synthesis and action. In Best Practice and Research: Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism (Vol. 36, Issue 4). Bailliere Tindall Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2022.101665

OECD (2023), Test No. 456: H295R Steroidogenesis Assay, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264122642-en.

Renfree, M. B., and Shaw, G. (2023). The alternate pathway of androgen metabolism and window of sensitivity. J. Endocrinol., JOE-22-0296. doi:10.1530/JOE-22-0296.

Shiraishi, S., Lee, P. W. N., Leung, A., Goh, V. H. H., Swerdloff, R. S., & Wang, C. (2008). Simultaneous measurement of serum testosterone and dihydrotestosterone by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Clinical Chemistry, 54(11), 1855–1863. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.103846

Swerdloff, R. S., Dudley, R. E., Page, S. T., Wang, C., & Salameh, W. A. (2017). Dihydrotestosterone: Biochemistry, physiology, and clinical implications of elevated blood levels. In Endocrine Reviews (Vol. 38, Issue 3, pp. 220–254). Endocrine Society. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2016-1067

Uhlén, M., Fagerberg, L., Hallström, B. M., Lindskog, C., Oksvold, P., Mardinoglu, A., Sivertsson, Å., Kampf, C., Sjöstedt, E., Asplund, A., Olsson, I. M., Edlund, K., Lundberg, E., Navani, S., Szigyarto, C. A. K., Odeberg, J., Djureinovic, D., Takanen, J. O., Hober, S., … Pontén, F. (2015). Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science, 347(6220). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260419

Event: 1614: Decrease, androgen receptor activation

Short Name: Decrease, AR activation

Key Event Component

Process Object Action
androgen receptor activity androgen receptor decreased

AOPs Including This Key Event

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Tissue

Domain of Applicability

Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
mammals mammals High NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
During development and at adulthood High
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Mixed High

This KE is considered broadly applicable across mammalian taxa as all mammals express the AR in numerous cells and tissues where it regulates gene transcription required for developmental processes and functions. It is, however, acknowledged that this KE most likely has a much broader domain of applicability extending to non-mammalian vertebrates. AOP developers are encouraged to add additional relevant knowledge to expand on the applicability to also include other vertebrates.

Key Event Description

This KE refers to decreased activation of the androgen receptor (AR) as occurring in complex biological systems such as tissues and organs in vivo. It is thus considered distinct from KEs describing either blocking of AR or decreased androgen synthesis.

The AR is a nuclear transcription factor with canonical AR activation regulated by the binding of the androgens such as testosterone or dihydrotestosterone (DHT). Thus, AR activity can be decreased by reduced levels of steroidal ligands (testosterone, DHT) or the presence of compounds interfering with ligand binding to the receptor (Davey & Grossmann, 2016; Gao et al., 2005).

In the inactive state, AR is sequestered in the cytoplasm of cells by molecular chaperones. In the classical (genomic) AR signaling pathway, AR activation causes dissociation of the chaperones, AR dimerization and translocation to the nucleus to modulate gene expression. AR binds to the androgen response element (ARE) (Davey & Grossmann, 2016; Gao et al., 2005). Notably, for transcriptional regulation the AR is closely associated with other co-factors that may differ between cells, tissues and life stages. In this way, the functional consequence of AR activation is cell- and tissue-specific. This dependency on co-factors such as the SRC proteins also means that stressors affecting recruitment of co-activators to AR can result in decreased AR activity (Heinlein & Chang, 2002).

Ligand-bound AR may also associate with cytoplasmic and membrane-bound proteins to initiate cytoplasmic signaling pathways with other functions than the nuclear pathway. Non-genomic AR signaling includes association with Src kinase to activate MAPK/ERK signaling and activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway. Decreased AR activity may therefore be a decrease in the genomic and/or non-genomic AR signaling pathways (Leung & Sadar, 2017).

How it is Measured or Detected

This KE specifically focuses on decreased in vivo activation, with most methods that can be used to measure AR activity carried out in vitro. They provide indirect information about the KE and are described in lower tier MIE/KEs (see for example MIE/KE-26 for AR antagonism, KE-1690 for decreased T levels and KE-1613 for decreased dihydrotestosterone levels). Assays may in the future be developed to measure AR activation in mammalian organisms.  

References

Davey, R. A., & Grossmann, M. (2016). Androgen Receptor Structure, Function and Biology: From Bench to Bedside. The Clinical Biochemist. Reviews, 37(1), 3–15.

Gao, W., Bohl, C. E., & Dalton, J. T. (2005). Chemistry and structural biology of androgen receptor. Chemical Reviews, 105(9), 3352–3370. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020456u

Heinlein, C. A., & Chang, C. (2002). Androgen Receptor (AR) Coregulators: An Overview. https://academic.oup.com/edrv/article/23/2/175/2424160

Leung, J. K., & Sadar, M. D. (2017). Non-Genomic Actions of the Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2017.00002

OECD (2022). Test No. 251: Rapid Androgen Disruption Activity Reporter (RADAR) assay. Paris: OECD Publishing doi:10.1787/da264d82-en.

 

 

Event: 286: Altered, Transcription of genes by the androgen receptor

Short Name: Altered, Transcription of genes by the AR

Key Event Component

Process Object Action
regulation of gene expression androgen receptor decreased

AOPs Including This Key Event

AOP ID and Name Event Type
Aop:19 - Androgen receptor antagonism leading to adverse effects in the male foetus (mammals) KeyEvent
Aop:307 - Decreased testosterone synthesis leading to short anogenital distance (AGD) in male (mammalian) offspring KeyEvent
Aop:344 - Androgen receptor (AR) antagonism leading to nipple retention (NR) in male (mammalian) offspring KeyEvent
Aop:345 - Androgen receptor (AR) antagonism leading to decreased fertility in females KeyEvent
Aop:305 - 5α-reductase inhibition leading to short anogenital distance (AGD) in male (mammalian) offspring KeyEvent
Aop:495 - Androgen receptor activation leading to prostate cancer KeyEvent
Aop:306 - Androgen receptor (AR) antagonism leading to short anogenital distance (AGD) in male (mammalian) offspring KeyEvent
Aop:496 - Androgen receptor agonism leading to reproduction dysfunction (in zebrafish) KeyEvent
Aop:372 - Androgen receptor antagonism leading to testicular cancer KeyEvent
Aop:570 - Decreased testosterone synthesis leading to hypospadias in male (mammalian) offspring KeyEvent
Aop:571 - 5α-reductase inhibition leading to hypospadias in male (mammalian) offspring KeyEvent
Aop:575 - Decreased testosterone synthesis leading to increased nipple retention (NR) in male (rodent) offspring KeyEvent
Aop:576 - 5α-reductase inhibition leading to increased nipple retention (NR) in male (rodent) offspring KeyEvent
Aop:477 - Androgen receptor (AR) antagonism leading to hypospadias in male (mammalian) offspring KeyEvent

Stressors

Name
Bicalutamide
Cyproterone acetate
Epoxiconazole
Flutamide
Flusilazole
Prochloraz
Propiconazole
Stressor:286 Tebuconazole
Triticonazole
Vinclozalin

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Tissue

Domain of Applicability

Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
mammals mammals High NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
During development and at adulthood High
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Mixed High

Both the DNA-binding and ligand-binding domains of the AR are highly evolutionary conserved, whereas the transactivation domain show more divergence, which may affect AR-mediated gene regulation across species (Davey and Grossmann 2016). Despite certain inter-species differences, AR function mediated through gene expression is highly conserved, with mutation studies from both humans and rodents showing strong correlation for AR-dependent development and function (Walters et al. 2010). 

This KE is considered broadly applicable across mammalian taxa, sex and developmental stages, as all mammals express the AR in numerous cells and tissues where it regulates gene transcription required for developmental processes and function. It is, however, acknowledged that this KE most likely has a much broader domain of applicability extending to non-mammalian vertebrates. AOP developers are encouraged to add additional relevant knowledge to expand on the applicability to also include other vertebrates.

Key Event Description

This KE refers to transcription of genes by the androgen receptor (AR) as occurring in complex biological systems such as tissues and organs in vivoRather than measuring individual genes, this KE aims to capture patterns of effects at transcriptome level in specific target cells/tissues. In other words, it can be replaced by specific KEs for individual adverse outcomes as information becomes available, for example the transcriptional toxicity response in prostate tissue for AO: prostate cancer, perineum tissue for AO: reduced AGD, etc.  AR regulates many genes that differ between tissues and life stages and, importantly, different gene transcripts within individual cells can go in either direction since AR can act as both transcriptional activator and suppressor. Thus, the ‘directionality’ of the KE cannot be either reduced or increased, but instead describe an altered transcriptome.

The Androgen Receptor and its function

The AR belongs to the steroid hormone nuclear receptor family. It is a ligand-activated transcription factor with three domains: the N-terminal domain, the DNA-binding domain, and the ligand-binding domain with the latter being the most evolutionary conserved (Davey and Grossmann 2016). Androgens (such as dihydrotestosterone and testosterone) are AR ligands and act by binding to the AR in androgen-responsive tissues (Davey and Grossmann 2016). Human AR mutations and mouse knockout models have established a fundamental role for AR in masculinization and spermatogenesis (Maclean et al.; Walters et al. 2010; Rana et al. 2014). The AR is also expressed in many other tissues such as bone, muscles, ovaries and within the immune system (Rana et al. 2014).

 

Altered transcription of genes by the AR as a Key Event

Upon activation by ligand-binding, the AR translocates from the cytoplasm to the cell nucleus, dimerizes, binds to androgen response elements in the DNA to modulate gene transcription (Davey and Grossmann 2016). The transcriptional targets vary between cells and tissues, as well as with developmental stages and is also dependent on available co-regulators (Bevan and Parker 1999; Heemers and Tindall 2007). It should also be mentioned that the AR can work in other ‘non-canonial’ ways such as non-genomic signaling, and ligand-independent activation (Davey & Grossmann, 2016; Estrada et al, 2003; Jin et al, 2013).

A large number of known, and proposed, target genes of AR canonical signaling have been identified by analysis of gene expression following treatments with AR agonists (Bolton et al. 2007; Ngan et al. 2009, Jin et al. 2013).

How it is Measured or Detected

Altered transcription of genes by the AR can be measured by measuring the transcription level of known downstream target genes by RT-qPCR or other transcription analyses approaches, e.g. transcriptomics.

Since this KE aims to capture AR-mediated transcriptional patterns of effect, downstream bioinformatics analyses will typically be required to identify and compare effect footprints. Clusters of genes can be statistically associated with, for example, biological process terms or gene ontology terms relevant for AR-mediated signaling. Large transcriptomics data repositories can be used to compare transcriptional patterns between chemicals, tissues, and species (e.g. TOXsIgN (Darde et al, 2018a; Darde et al, 2018b), comparisons can be made to identified sets of AR ‘biomarker’ genes (e.g. as done in (Rooney et al, 2018)), and various methods can be used e.g. connectivity mapping (Keenan et al, 2019).

References

Bevan C, Parker M (1999) The role of coactivators in steroid hormone action. Exp. Cell Res. 253:349–356

Bolton EC, So AY, Chaivorapol C, et al (2007) Cell- and gene-specific regulation of primary target genes by the androgen receptor. Genes Dev 21:2005–2017. doi: 10.1101/gad.1564207

Darde, T. A., Gaudriault, P., Beranger, R., Lancien, C., Caillarec-Joly, A., Sallou, O., et al. (2018a). TOXsIgN: a cross-species repository for toxicogenomic signatures. Bioinformatics 34, 2116–2122. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty040.

Darde, T. A., Chalmel, F., and Svingen, T. (2018b). Exploiting advances in transcriptomics to improve on human-relevant toxicology. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 11–12, 43–50. doi:10.1016/j.cotox.2019.02.001.

Davey RA, Grossmann M (2016) Androgen Receptor Structure, Function and Biology: From Bench to Bedside. Clin Biochem Rev 37:3–15

Estrada M, Espinosa A, Müller M, Jaimovich E (2003) Testosterone Stimulates Intracellular Calcium Release and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases Via a G Protein-Coupled Receptor in Skeletal Muscle Cells. Endocrinology 144:3586–3597. doi: 10.1210/en.2002-0164

Heemers H V., Tindall DJ (2007) Androgen receptor (AR) coregulators: A diversity of functions converging on and regulating the AR transcriptional complex. Endocr. Rev. 28:778–808

Jin, Hong Jian, Jung Kim, and Jindan Yu. 2013. “Androgen Receptor Genomic Regulation.” Translational Andrology and Urology 2(3):158–77. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2013.09.01

Keenan, A. B., Wojciechowicz, M. L., Wang, Z., Jagodnik, K. M., Jenkins, S. L., Lachmann, A., et al. (2019). Connectivity Mapping: Methods and Applications. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Data Sci. 2, 69–92. doi:10.1146/ANNUREV-BIODATASCI-072018-021211.

Maclean HE, Chu S, Warne GL, Zajact JD Related Individuals with Different Androgen Receptor Gene Deletions

MacLeod DJ, Sharpe RM, Welsh M, et al (2010) Androgen action in the masculinization programming window and development of male reproductive organs. In: International Journal of Andrology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp 279–287

Ngan S, Stronach EA, Photiou A, et al (2009) Microarray coupled to quantitative RT–PCR analysis of androgen-regulated genes in human LNCaP prostate cancer cells. Oncogene 28:2051–2063. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.68

Rana K, Davey RA, Zajac JD (2014) Human androgen deficiency: Insights gained from androgen receptor knockout mouse models. Asian J. Androl. 16:169–177

Rooney, J. P., Chorley, B., Kleinstreuer, N., and Corton, J. C. (2018). Identification of Androgen Receptor Modulators in a Prostate Cancer Cell Line Microarray Compendium. Toxicol. Sci. 166, 146–162. doi:10.1093/TOXSCI/KFY187.

Walters KA, Simanainen U, Handelsman DJ (2010) Molecular insights into androgen actions in male and female reproductive function from androgen receptor knockout models. Hum Reprod Update 16:543–558. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmq003

List of Adverse Outcomes in this AOP

Event: 2082: Hypospadias, increased

Short Name: Hypospadias

Key Event Component

Process Object Action
embryonic organ development penis abnormal

AOPs Including This Key Event

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Organ

Organ term

Organ term
penis

Domain of Applicability

Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
human Homo sapiens High NCBI
mouse Mus musculus High NCBI
rat Rattus norvegicus High NCBI
mammals mammals NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
Perinatal High
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Male High

Taxonomic applicability: Numerous studies have shown an association in humans between in utero exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals and hypospadias. In mice and rats, in utero exposure to several endocrine disrupting chemicals, in particular estrogens and antiandrogens, have been shown to cause hypospadias in male offspring at different frequencies (Mattiske & Pask, 2021). Androgen-driven development of the male external genitalia is evolutionary conserved in most mammals and, to some extent, also in other vertebrate classes (Gredler et al., 2014). Hypospadias can in principle occur in all animals that form a genital tubercle and have been observed in many domestic animal species and wildlife species.

Life stage applicability: Penis development is finished prenatally in humans, and hypospadias is diagnosed at birth (Baskin & Ebbers, 2006). In rodents, penis development is not fully completed until weeks after birth, but hypospadias may be identified in early postnatal life as well, and in some cases in late gestation (Sinclair et al., 2017).

Sex applicability: Hypospadias is primarily used in reference to malformation of the male external genitalia. 

 

Key Event Description

Hypospadias is a malformation of the penis where the urethral opening is displaced from the tip of the glans, usually on the ventral side on the phallus. Most cases of hypospadias are milder where the urethral opening still appears on the glans proper or on the most distal part of the shaft. In more severe cases, the opening may be more proximally placed on the shaft or even as low as the scrotum or the perineum.

In addition to the misplacement of the urethral opening, hypospadias is associated with an absence of ventral prepuce, an excess of dorsal preputial tissue, and in some cases a downward curvature of the penis (chordee).  Patients with hypospadias may need surgical repairment depending on severity, with more proximal hypospadias patients in most need of surgeries to achieve optimal functional and cosmetic results (Baskin, 2000; Baskin & Ebbers, 2006; Mattiske & Pask, 2021). The incidence of hypospadias varies greatly between countries, from 1:100 to 1:500 of newborn boys (Skakkebaek et al., 2016), and the global prevalence seems to be increasing (Paulozzi, 1999; Springer et al., 2016; Yu et al., 2019).

The external genitalia arise from the biphasic genital tubercle during fetal development. Androgens (testosterone and dihydrotestosterone) drive formation of the male external genitalia. In humans, the urethra develops by fusion of two endoderm-derived urethral folds. Disruption of genital tubercle differentiation results in an incomplete urethra, i.e. hypospadias.  (Baskin, 2000; Baskin & Ebbers, 2006).

 

How it is Measured or Detected

In humans, hypospadias is diagnosed clinically by physical examination of the infant and is at first recognized by the absence of ventral prepuce and concurrent excess dorsal prepuce (Baskin, 2000). Hypospadias may be classified according to the location of the urethral meatus: Glandular, subcoronal, midshaft, penoscrotal, scrotal, and perineal (Baskin & Ebbers, 2006).

In mice and rats, macroscopic assessment of hypospadias may be performed postnatally, and several OECD test guidelines require macroscopic examination of genital abnormalities in in vivo toxicity studies (TG 414, 416, 421/422, 443). The guidelines do not define hypospadias or how to identify them. Fetal and neonatal identification of hypospadias may require microscopic examination for proper evaluation of the pathology. This can be done by scanning electron microscopy (Uda et al., 2004), or by histological assessment in which the presence of the urethral opening in proximal, transverse sections (for example co-occuring with the os penis or corpus cavernosum), indicates hypospadias (Mahawong et al., 2014; Sinclair et al., 2017; Vilela et al., 2007). In a semiquantitative, histologic approach, the number of transverse sections of the penis with internalization of the urethra was related to the total length of the penis, achieving a percentage of urethral internalization. In this study, ≤89% of urethral internalization was defined as indicative of mild hypospadias (Stewart et al., 2018).

Regulatory Significance of the AO

In the OECD guidelines for developmental and reproductive toxicology, several test endpoints include examination of structural abnormalities with special attention to the organs of the reproductive system. These are: Test No. 414 ‘Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study’ (OECD, 2018a); Test No. 416 ‘Two-Generation Reproduction Toxicity’ (OECD, 2001) and Tests No. 421/422 ‘Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test’ (OECD, 2016a, 2016b). In Test No. 443 ‘Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study’ (OECD, 2018b), hypospadias is specifically mentioned as a genital abnormality to note.

References

Baskin, L. S. (2000). Hypospadias and urethral development. The Journal of Urology, 163(3), 951–956.

Baskin, L. S., & Ebbers, M. B. (2006). Hypospadias: Anatomy, etiology, and technique. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 41(3), 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.11.059

Gredler, M. L., Larkins, C. E., Leal, F., Lewis, A. K., Herrera, A. M., Perriton, C. L., Sanger, T. J., & Cohn, M. J. (2014). Evolution of External Genitalia: Insights from Reptilian Development. Sexual Development, 8(5), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1159/000365771

Mahawong, P., Sinclair, A., Li, Y., Schlomer, B., Rodriguez, E., Ferretti, M. M., Liu, B., Baskin, L. S., & Cunha, G. R. (2014). Prenatal diethylstilbestrol induces malformation of the external genitalia of male and female mice and persistent second-generation developmental abnormalities of the external genitalia in two mouse strains. Differentiation, 88(2–3), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diff.2014.09.005

Mattiske, D. M., & Pask, A. J. (2021). Endocrine disrupting chemicals in the pathogenesis of hypospadias; developmental and toxicological perspectives. Current Research in Toxicology, 2, 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crtox.2021.03.004

OECD. (2001). Test No. 416: Two-Generation Reproduction Toxicity. In OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264070868-en

OECD. (2018). Test No. 414: Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study. In OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264070820-en

OECD. (2025a). Test No. 421: Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test. In OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1787/9789264264380-en

OECD. (2025b). Test No. 422: Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test. In OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. OECD Publising. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1787/9789264264403-en

OECD. (2025c). Test No. 443: Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study. In OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1787/9789264185371-en

Paulozzi, L. J. (1999). International Trends in Rates of Hypospadias and Cryptorchidism. Environmental Health Perspectives, 107(4), 297–302. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.99107297

Sinclair, A. W., Cao, M., Pask, A., Baskin, L., & Cunha, G. R. (2017). Flutamide-induced hypospadias in rats: A critical assessment. Differentiation, 94, 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diff.2016.12.001

Skakkebaek, N. E., Rajpert-De Meyts, E., Buck Louis, G. M., Toppari, J., Andersson, A.-M., Eisenberg, M. L., Jensen, T. K., Jørgensen, N., Swan, S. H., Sapra, K. J., Ziebe, S., Priskorn, L., & Juul, A. (2016). Male Reproductive Disorders and Fertility Trends: Influences of Environment and Genetic Susceptibility. Physiological Reviews, 96(1), 55–97. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00017.2015.-It

Springer, A., van den Heijkant, M., & Baumann, S. (2016). Worldwide prevalence of hypospadias. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 12(3), 152.e1-152.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.12.002

Stewart, M. K., Mattiske, D. M., & Pask, A. J. (2018). In utero exposure to both high- and low-dose diethylstilbestrol disrupts mouse genital tubercle development. Biology of Reproduction, 99(6), 1184–1193. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioy142

Uda, A., Kojima, Y., Hayashi, Y., Mizuno, K., Asai, N., & Kohri, K. (2004). Morphological features of external genitalia in hypospadiac rat model: 3-dimensional analysis. The Journal of Urology, 171(3), 1362–1366. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0000100140.42618.54

Vilela, M. L. B., Willingham, E., Buckley, J., Liu, B. C., Agras, K., Shiroyanagi, Y., & Baskin, L. S. (2007). Endocrine Disruptors and Hypospadias: Role of Genistein and the Fungicide Vinclozolin. Urology, 70(3), 618–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.05.004

Yu, X., Nassar, N., Mastroiacovo, P., Canfield, M., Groisman, B., Bermejo-Sánchez, E., Ritvanen, A., Kiuru-Kuhlefelt, S., Benavides, A., Sipek, A., Pierini, A., Bianchi, F., Källén, K., Gatt, M., Morgan, M., Tucker, D., Canessa, M. A., Gajardo, R., Mutchinick, O. M., … Agopian, A. J. (2019). Hypospadias Prevalence and Trends in International Birth Defect Surveillance Systems, 1980–2010. European Urology, 76(4), 482–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.06.027

 

Appendix 2

List of Key Event Relationships in the AOP